APPENDIX B. Origin Destination Study Data
|
|
- Conrad Barker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX B Origin Destination Study Data
2
3 - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 Map of the Study area with Site Locations... 2 Summary Table of Results for the TH 14 Corridor Study... 3 INTRODUCTION... 4 FIELD PROCEDURES... 5 DATA PROCESSING... 6 DATA ANALYSIS Traffic Passing New Ulm Traffic Along TH 14 Between Mankato and New Ulm Reverse Commute Traffic from New Ulm to Mankato FINDINGS... 52
4 TH 14 CORRIDOR (MANKATO-TO-NEW ULM, MINNESOTA) ORIGIN-DESTINATION STUDY FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A video license plate study of vehicles moving between seven survey stations on TH 14 and associated highways in the vicinity of New Ulm, Nicollet and Courtland, Minnesota was conducted on August 14, The three-fold purpose of the study was to determine point-to-point origin-destination movements among the seven locations in order to distinguish the following: 1. traffic passing through New Ulm. 2. traffic along TH 14 between Mankato and New Ulm. 3. Reverse Commute traffic from New Ulm to Mankato. The license plates of vehicles passing each survey station were recorded on videotape. The plate records of vehicles passing a given station were matched against the plate records obtained at the other stations in order to determine the volume of movement from one station to another. The survey covered a twelve-hour period from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. A total of 24,735 license plate records were collected, representing 88.6 percent of the 27,919 vehicle movements passing the three survey sites. (Please refer to a map of the study area with the location of these survey stations on the following page.) About 20 percent of the passenger vehicle trips entering New Ulm pass directly through the town and about 80 percent of entering passenger vehicle trips stop in town for one or more purposes. The percentage of commercial vehicle trips is somewhat greater, about 31 percent. The distribution of and trips varies from station to station. The highest percentage of passenger vehicle trips is found entering at Station 3 and the lowest entering at Station 2. (Please refer to the table summarizing these results on the next following page.) The number of trips along TH 14 from the farthest western point (Station 3) and the farthest eastern point (Station 7) was evenly balanced in both directions with approximately 215 passenger vehicles and 36 commercial vehicles making this trip. The mid-point location, Station 6 had many more intermediate-through trips for both passenger and commercial vehicles through to either Station 3 or to Station 7. The Reverse Commute traffic, or percentage of passenger vehicles found to leave New Ulm towards Mankato in the morning and returning to re-enter the New Ulm area from the direction of Mankato in the afternoon was found to be approximately 28 percent of the leaving traffic during the 2-hour morning survey period from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 1
5 s 14 Juni Lake Clear Lake Washington Park West Park North Park SA; SA; GDT, GDT, Inc., Inc., Rel. Rel. 04/ /2000 USA; SA; GDT, GDT, Inc., Inc., Rel. Rel. 04/ / / Johnson Field New New New New New Ulm Ulm Ulm Ulm Ulm South German Park Lincoln Park Flandrau State Park Site No. 2 - CSAH Searles Searles 13 Searles Searles Courtland Courtland Courtland Courtland Courtland Gieseke Bay 68 Big Big Island Island Little Rock Creek Site No. 6 - TH 14 Between CSAH 37 & Courtland 6,600 ADT - 2 Lanes Linden Linden Round Round Island Island Solberg Solberg Lakebed Lakebed Cambria Cambria Cambria Heyer Heyer Island Island Nelson Bay Crone Crone Island Island Gimmer Bay Harris Lake Clay Clay Bank Bank Nelson Narrows 14 Poor Farm Bay Loon Bay Lone Lone Tree Tree Point Point Brooks Brooks Island Island Walters Walters Point Point South Bay 68 Saul Saul Paugh Paugh Point Point Blocks Blocks Point Point Peterson Bay Currier Bay Swan Lake Breezy Breezy Point Point Nicollet Bay Dalhman Dalhman Island Island 14 Horseshoe Lake Johnson Bay Mcgibneys Lake 111 Judson Judson Judson Judson Judson Nicollet Nicollet Nicollet Nicollet Nicollet 68 Middle Lake Big Cottonwood River Lake Horseshoe Lake Site No. 2 - CSAH 13 West of New Ulm 3,100 ADT - 2 Lanes Essig Essig Essig Essig Essig Site No. 3 - TH 14 West of New Ulm 4,000 ADT - 2 Lanes Site No. 1 - TH 15/TH 68 South of New Ulm 5,100 ADT - 3 Lanes School Lake Juni Lake St St St St George George George George George Site No. 4 - CSAH 29 North of New Ulm 5,000 ADT - 2 Lanes West of New Ulm 3,100 ADT - 2 Lanes Clear Lake North Park Washington Park West Park DeLorme. DeLorme. DeLorme. DeLorme. Street Street Street Street Atlas Atlas Atlas Atlas USA; USA; USA; USA; GDT, GDT, GDT, GDT, Inc., Inc., Inc., Inc., Rel. Rel. Rel. Rel. 04/ / / / DeLorme. Street Atlas USA; 2000 GDT, Inc., Rel. 04/ Johnson Field New New New New New Ulm Ulm Ulm Ulm Ulm Lincoln Park 15 Flandrau State Park Site No. 1 - TH 15/TH 68 South of New Ulm 5,100 ADT - 3 Lanes 15 South German Park Site No. 7 - TH 14 East of Nicollet 7,100 ADT - 2 Lanes Little Cottonwood River 15 Klossner Klossner Klossner Klossner Klossner Site No. 5 - TH 15 North of New Ulm 3,900 ADT - 2 Lanes Site No. 6 - TH 14 Between CSAH 37 & Courtland 6,600 ADT - 2 Lanes Searles Searles Searles Searles Minnesota River Linden Linden Courtland Courtland Courtland Courtland Courtland Round Round Island Island Solberg Solberg Lakebed Lakebed Gieseke Bay Cambria Cambria Monson Monson Island Island Big Big Island Island Heyer Heyer Island Island Nelson Bay Crone Crone Island Island Gimmer Bay Harris Lake Peterson Lake Clay Clay Bank Bank Nelson Narrows Poor Farm Bay Loon Bay Lone Lone Tree Tree Point Point Brooks Brooks Island Island Walters Walters Point Point South Bay 68 Nicollet Nicollet Poor Poor Farm Farm Point Point Saul Saul Paugh Paugh Point Point Blocks Blocks Point Point Peterson Bay Currier Bay Swan Lake Breezy Breezy Point Point Nicollet Bay Dalhman Dalhman Island Island Horseshoe Lake Johnson Bay Site No. 7 - TH 14 East of Nicollet 7,100 ADT - 2 Lanes Mcgibneys Lake Judson Judson Judson Judson Judson Nicollet Nicollet Nicollet Nicollet Nicollet 68 Duck Lake Middle Lake 6 Co Ditch No 4 Co Ditch No 11 Nicollet Creek Minnesota River Nicollet Creek Co Ditch No 4 Minnesota River Co Ditch No 11 Nicollet Creek Nicollet Creek Minnesota River Minnesota River Little Cottonwood River Minnesota River Little Cottonwood River Minnesota River Little Cottonwood River 20TH ST S Cottonwood River Little Cottonwood River Minnesota River 12TH ST N 6TH ST S 12TH ST S Little Cottonwood River Cottonwood River 20TH ST S Minnesota River Cottonwood River Big Cottonwood River Little Cottonwood River 12TH ST S 6TH ST S Little Cottonwood River 12TH ST N Cottonwood River Cottonwood River wood River r
6 Summary Table for TH 14 Mankato-to-New Ulm Corridor Study From Vehicles Vehicles Station No. No. % No. % No. No. % No. % New Ulm Cordon Study 1-IN 2, % 1, % % % 2-IN % % % % 3-IN 1, % 1, % % % 4-IN % % % % 5-IN 1, % 1, % % % 6-IN 2, % 2, % % % Total 10,010 1, % 8, % % % TH 14 Corridor Study (East-West Corridor) 3-EB to 7-EB 1, % 1, % % % 7-WB to 3-WB 2, % 2, % % % 3-EB to 6-EB 1, % 1, % % % 6-WB to 3-WB 2, % 2, % % % 6-EB to 7-EB 3,180 1, % 1, % % % 7-WB to 6-WB 2,437 1, % 1, % % % Total 14,027 3, % 10, % 1, % 1, % Reverse Commute Study (New Ulm-to-Mankato) 1-OUT % % 6-OUT % % 7-OUT % % Total 1, % % Not Applicable for Vehicles 3
7 INTRODUCTION A video license plate study of vehicles moving between seven survey stations on TH 14 and associated highways in the vicinity of New Ulm, Nicollet and Courtland, Minnesota was conducted on August 14, The study was conducted by Transfo for the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) in cooperation with The Howard R. Green Company (HR Green). The three-fold purpose of the study was to determine point-to-point origin-destination movements among the seven locations in order to distinguish the following: 1. traffic passing through New Ulm. 2. traffic along TH 14 between Mankato and New Ulm. 3. Reverse Commute traffic from New Ulm to Mankato. The license plates of vehicles passing each survey station were recorded on videotape. The plate records of vehicles passing a given station were matched against the plate records obtained at the other stations in order to determine the volume of movement from one station to another. The survey covered a twelve-hour period from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. A total of 24,735 license plate records were collected, representing 88.6 percent of the 27,919 vehicle movements passing the three survey sites. (Please refer to a map of the study area with the location of these survey stations shown previously on page number 2.) The following sections of this report provide information regarding the data collection and analysis procedures, and data summaries. 4
8 FIELD PROCEDURES High-specification video camcorders mounted on tripods were positioned to record the rear license plates of vehicles passing within the camcorder s field of view. Each inbound and each outbound traffic lane was monitored by a single camcorder located on the highway shoulder. Each of the seven survey stations included 2 (or 3) video camcorders operated by an experienced Transfo Camera Operator, and these Operators were supervised by Team Leaders and a Field Supervisor to ensure each camcorder was operating properly and that the Operator consistently was capturing clear and concise images of vehicle license plates during the proper time periods and direction of travel. In all, a total of 180 lane-hours of traffic were recorded over the twelve-hour survey period. (Please refer to the photos below for examples of these procedures used in another Mn/DOT video survey conducted earlier by Transfo.) 5
9 DATA PROCESSING The license plate images recorded on the videotapes were transcribed into computer files using Transfo s image analysis system. Separate files were created for passenger vehicles and for commercial vehicles. In those instances where the license plate image could not be read due primarily to a license plate being obscured by an object such as a trailer hitch or bicycle rack, or because the vehicle changed lanes at the point of observation the presence of the vehicle was recorded so that an accurate count of the number of vehicles passing the camcorder location could be obtained. (Photographs illustrating the image analysis system are shown below.) The number of passenger vehicle license plates read, number of commercial vehicle license plates read, total vehicle counts (based on video and tube counts video counts were used for determining the OD movement counts and percentages because they are based on the actual number of vehicles passing each station) and license plate read rate for each survey station by direction and time of day are presented in Table 1. (Please refer to the next seven pages, page numbers 7 through 13 for Table 1.) As shown in Table 1, the tube counts of vehicles are consistently higher than the video counts of vehicles (overall the tube counts are 19% higher than the video counts). This can be explained by the difference in how the two sets of count data were collected. The counts collected from the video counted each individual vehicle. In contrast, the counts collected using the tubes counted the total number of axles and was divided by two to obtain the number of vehicles. Because some vehicles have more than two axles, tube counts overstate the number of actual vehicles on the roadway. The more multi-axle vehicles there are, the greater the overstatement of vehicles. In the case of station 4, the differences between the tube counts and the video counts are partially due to a tube counter malfunction at that station. Because of the malfunction, the tube count data shown in Table 1 for Station 4 was collected again on the same weekday during the following week. 6
10 Table 1: Site 1 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 1-IN TH 15/TH 68 - South of New Ulm Direction of Travel No. of Lanes Date of Shoot NB 2 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 1-IN (Northbound) 1, ,333 2,716 14% 2, % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 1-OUT TH 15/TH 68 - South of New Ulm SB 1 14-Aug-02 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 1-OUT (Southbound) 1, ,391 2,748 13% 2, %
11 Table 1 (con'td.): Site 2 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 2-IN CSAH 13 - West of New Ulm Direction of Travel NB No. of Lanes Date of Shoot 1 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 2-IN (Northbound) % % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 2-OUT CSAH 13 - West of New Ulm SB 1 14-Aug-02 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 2-OUT (Southbound) % %
12 Table 1 (con'td.): Site 3 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 3-IN TH 14 - West of New Ulm Direction of Travel EB No. of Lanes Date of Shoot 1 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 3-IN (Eastbound) 1, ,754 2,212 21% 1, % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 3-OUT TH 14 - West of New Ulm WB 1 14-Aug-02 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 3-OUT (Westbound) 1, ,811 2,321 22% 1, %
13 Table 1 (con'td.): Site 4 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 4-IN CSAH 29 - North of New Ulm Direction of Travel SB 1 No. of Lanes Date of Shoot 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 4-IN (Southbound) ,005 17% % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 4-OUT CSAH 29 - North of New Ulm NB 1 14-Aug-02 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 4-OUT (Northbound) ,088 17% % NOTE: The tube counts for Site 4 were obtained on Wednesday, August 21, 2002 which is exactly one week after the video survey was conducted.
14 Table 1 (con'td.): Site 5 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 5-IN TH 15 - North of New Ulm Direction of Travel No. of Lanes Date of Shoot SB 1 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 5-IN (Southbound) 1, ,005 2,382 16% 1, % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 5-OUT TH 15 - North of New Ulm NB 1 14-Aug-02 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 5-OUT (Northbound) 1, ,025 2,705 25% 1, %
15 Table 1 (con'td.): Site 6 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 6-IN TH 14 - Between CSAH 37 and Courtland Direction of Travel WB 1 No. of Lanes Date of Shoot 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 6-IN (Westbound) 2, ,228 4,170 23% 2, % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 6-OUT TH 14 - Between CSAH 37 and Courtland EB 1 14-Aug-02 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 6-OUT (Eastbound) 2, ,360 4,192 20% 2, %
16 Table 1 (con'td.): Site 7 Locations, Direction, Traffic Counts, Plates Read and Percentage of Plates Read. Site No. Site Location 7-IN TH 14 - East of Nicollet Direction of Travel No. of Lanes Date of Shoot WB 1 14-Aug-02 Start Time Plates Plates Total Vehicles Total Vehicles (Tube Counts) % Difference: Tube vs. Video Total Plates Plates % of Vehicles 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 7-IN (Westbound) 2, ,752 3,583 23% 2, % 7:00-8:00AM % % 8:00-9:00AM % % 9:00-10:00AM % % 10:00-11:00AM % % 11:00AM-12:00PM % % 7-OUT TH 14 - East of Nicollet EB 1 14-Aug-02 12:00-1:00PM % % 1:00-2:00PM % % 2:00-3:00PM % % 3:00-4:00PM % % 4:00-5:00PM % % 5:00-6:00PM % % 6:00-7:00PM % % Total for Site 7-OUT (Eastbound) 2, ,972 3,718 20% 2, % Total for All 7 Sites (Both Directions) 22,652 2,085 27,919 34,518 19% 24, %
17 DATA ANALYSIS The license plate records associated with a given survey station was matched against the records associated with logically related stations to determine the pattern of movement among the several stations. Traffic Passing New Ulm The resulting origin-destination pairings for determining the vehicles passing through New Ulm are presented in Tables 2A-1 through 2A-7. Note that trips entering at each station are matched against trips exiting the area at all stations, excluding the one at which they entered. Thus, for example, of the 165 passenger vehicles observed entering northbound at Station 1 between 12:00 noon and 1:00 p.m. (Table 2A-1), 19 passenger vehicles were observed exiting Stations Numbers 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 within a specified maximum travel time for that inbound time period. (Please refer to the next six following pages, page numbers 17 through 22 for Tables 2A-1 through 2A-6.) The origin-destination pairings presented in Tables 2A-1 through 2A-6 provide an initial estimate of the actual number of vehicle movements between survey stations. These initial estimates need to be adjusted to take into account the fact that less than 100 percent of the license plates of vehicles passing a given survey station were read. The adjustment procedure is based on the license plate read rate at the two survey stations being paired. Consider the 13 passenger vehicle movements observed from Station 1 (TH 15/TH 68) to Station 5 (TH 15) for the 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. period, as presented in Table 2A-1. As shown in Table 1, 90.1 percent of the license plates of vehicles passing Station 1 inbound were read and 88.8 percent of the license plates of vehicles passing Station 2 outbound were read. The adjusted flow between these two stations during the time period in question is then calculated as: 13 x [1/(0.901 x 0.888)] = 16 Each observed origin-destination pairing is adjusted in this manner. The adjusted O-D pairings for the New Ulm traffic are presented as movement volumes in Tables 2B-1 though 2B-6 and as percentages of inbound volumes in Tables 2C-1 through 2C-6. (Please refer to page numbers 23 through 28 for Tables 2B-7 through 2B-6, and page numbers 29 through 34 for Tables 2C-1 through 2C-6.) 14
18 The breakdown between and trips from each inbound station to each outbound station was based on the nominal time it would take for a vehicle to travel from one station to another without stopping for any purpose other than for typical traffic conditions. The actual travel time measurements and the nominal non-stop times are presented in Table 1-B on the next following page, page number 16. For example, each of the 13 passenger vehicles that passed both Station 1 inbound and Station 5 outbound during the 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. period (as shown in Table 2A-1) completed that journey in less than 21 minutes and were considered to be trips. All other observed trips were considered to be trips; that is: vehicles that were observed passing from Station 1 to Station 5 in more than 21 minutes and vehicles that were observed at one station but not at the other were considered to be trips. 15
19 Table 1-B: Travel Time Criteria for Determining Trips TO/FROM STATION FROM/TO STATION Actual Travel Time Recorded in Minutes * Maximum Travel Time Criteria in Minutes for Determing Trips less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than less than 21 * NOTE: Data collected by the Howard R. Green Company on 8/14/02 16
20 Table 2A-1: "Observed" O-D Matches from Site 1 - Northbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 1 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 2, Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 1 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
21 Table 2A-2: "Observed" O-D Matches from Site 2 - Northbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 2 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 2 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
22 Table 2A-3: "Observed" O-D Matches from Site 3 - Eastbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 3 - EB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 1, Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 3 - EB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
23 Table 2A-4: "Observed" O-D Matches from Site 4 - Southbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 4 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 4 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
24 Table 2A-5: "Observed" O-D Matches from Site 5 - Southbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 5 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 1, Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 5 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
25 Table 2A-6: "Observed" O-D Matches from Site 6 - Westbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 6 - WB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 2, Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 6 - WB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
26 Table 2B-1: "Adjusted" O-D Movement Counts from Site 1 - Northbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 1 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 2, ,881 Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 1 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
27 Table 2B-2: "Adjusted" O-D Movement Counts from Site 2 - Northbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 2 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 2 - NB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
28 Table 2B-3: "Adjusted" O-D Movement Counts from Site 3 - Eastbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 3 - EB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 1, ,094 Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 3 - EB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
29 Table 2B-4: "Adjusted" O-D Movement Counts from Site 4 - Southbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 4 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 4 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
30 Table 2B-5: "Adjusted" O-D Movement Counts from Site 5 - Southbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 5 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 1, ,441 Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 5 - SB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
31 Table 2B-6: "Adjusted" O-D Movement Counts from Site 6 - Westbound Direction Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 6 - WB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total 2, ,308 Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 6 - WB 7:00-8:00 am :00-9:00 am :00-10:00 am :00-11:00 am :00-12:00 pm :00-1:00 pm :00-2:00 pm :00-3:00 pm :00-4:00 pm :00-5:00 pm :00-6:00 pm :00-7:00 pm Total
32 Table 2C-1: "Adjusted" O-D Percentages from Site 1 - Northbound Direction (based on inbound traffic) Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 1 - NB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0% 4.1% 95.9% 8:00-9:00 am % 1.4% 0.0% 5.8% 0.7% 8.6% 91.4% 9:00-10:00 am % 4.0% 1.7% 17.6% 0.0% 23.4% 76.6% 10:00-11:00 am % 1.7% 0.7% 13.0% 1.8% 17.2% 82.8% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 1.7% 12.0% 0.9% 14.6% 85.4% 12:00-1:00 pm % 2.3% 0.8% 9.6% 1.8% 15.2% 84.8% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 1.5% 9.3% 2.3% 13.2% 86.8% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.7% 3.9% 11.0% 0.8% 16.3% 83.7% 3:00-4:00 pm % 2.5% 1.9% 11.0% 0.0% 15.5% 84.5% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.7% 3.4% 10.2% 2.3% 16.5% 83.5% 5:00-6:00 pm % 2.7% 1.3% 4.6% 1.4% 10.0% 90.0% 6:00-7:00 pm % 0.6% 1.2% 7.5% 0.0% 9.4% 90.6% Total 2, % 1.3% 1.5% 9.4% 1.0% 13.3% 86.7% Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 1 - NB 7:00-8:00 am % 7.5% 0.0% 14.8% 0.0% 22.3% 77.7% 8:00-9:00 am % 11.4% 0.0% 21.7% 0.0% 33.1% 66.9% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 10:00-11:00 am % 6.3% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 11.7% 88.3% 11:00-12:00 pm % 5.4% 5.7% 16.4% 0.0% 27.5% 72.5% 12:00-1:00 pm % 11.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.4% 88.6% 1:00-2:00 pm 8 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 16.1% 0.0% 49.4% 50.6% 2:00-3:00 pm 8 0.0% 16.3% 15.3% 34.9% 0.0% 66.5% 33.5% 3:00-4:00 pm % 5.6% 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 86.7% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 25.4% 0.0% 25.4% 74.6% 5:00-6:00 pm 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 0.0% 13.3% 86.7% 6:00-7:00 pm 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total % 6.1% 4.0% 10.9% 0.0% 21.1% 78.9%
33 Table 2C-2: "Adjusted" O-D Percentages from Site 2 - Northbound Direction (based on inbound traffic) Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 2 - NB 7:00-8:00 am % 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.1% 4.1% 95.9% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 8.0% 1.7% 9.8% 90.2% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 2.5% 97.5% 10:00-11:00 am % 2.3% 0.0% 2.0% 9.5% 15.8% 84.2% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 2.9% 5.3% 94.7% 12:00-1:00 pm % 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.2% 94.8% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 1.9% 9.1% 90.9% 2:00-3:00 pm % 2.1% 0.0% 4.2% 0.0% 8.4% 91.6% 3:00-4:00 pm % 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 4.9% 95.1% 4:00-5:00 pm % 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 97.8% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 1.6% 6.6% 93.4% 6:00-7:00 pm % 1.4% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 5.8% 94.2% Total % 1.1% 0.0% 2.3% 2.1% 6.5% 93.5% Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 2 - NB 7:00-8:00 am 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 8:00-9:00 am 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 9:00-10:00 am 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 10:00-11:00 am 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 11:00-12:00 pm 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 12:00-1:00 pm 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1:00-2:00 pm 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 2:00-3:00 pm 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 3:00-4:00 pm 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 4:00-5:00 pm 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 5:00-6:00 pm 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 6:00-7:00 pm 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
34 Table 2C-3: "Adjusted" O-D Percentages from Site 3 - Eastbound Direction (based on inbound traffic) Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 3 - EB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 6.4% 12.2% 87.8% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 10.9% 26.5% 38.4% 61.6% 9:00-10:00 am % 1.9% 0.0% 4.3% 25.9% 32.8% 67.2% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 4.4% 24.3% 33.4% 66.6% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 16.1% 22.6% 77.4% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 18.0% 29.5% 70.5% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 5.1% 17.6% 23.6% 76.4% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 6.2% 19.9% 27.6% 72.4% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.0% 0.7% 7.4% 24.9% 36.2% 63.8% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.7% 0.0% 7.8% 21.7% 30.9% 69.1% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.9% 0.0% 3.9% 25.8% 31.6% 68.4% 6:00-7:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 18.6% 30.4% 69.6% Total 1, % 0.3% 0.1% 6.2% 20.6% 29.3% 70.7% Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 3 - EB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 8.3% 20.0% 80.0% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.6% 67.5% 32.5% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.9% 29.3% 70.7% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 9.4% 0.0% 29.1% 70.9% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 46.7% 53.3% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% 54.5% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 9.9% 14.4% 34.4% 65.6% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.5% 28.8% 71.2% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.0% 69.0% 5:00-6:00 pm 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 6:00-7:00 pm 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 11.5% 34.6% 65.4%
35 Table 2C-4: "Adjusted" O-D Percentages from Site 4 - Southbound Direction (based on inbound traffic) Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 4 - SB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.4% 17.7% 82.3% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 31.0% 36.1% 63.9% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 35.7% 39.9% 60.1% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.0% 1.7% 1.4% 21.2% 30.4% 69.6% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 32.7% 41.3% 58.7% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.5% 22.3% 77.7% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 22.9% 26.7% 73.3% 2:00-3:00 pm % 1.6% 0.0% 3.9% 12.7% 22.0% 78.0% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% 13.6% 26.9% 73.1% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 26.7% 34.7% 65.3% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.2% 20.8% 79.2% 6:00-7:00 pm % 1.7% 0.0% 1.6% 22.3% 27.4% 72.6% Total % 0.3% 0.3% 1.8% 22.1% 28.6% 71.4% Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 4 - SB 7:00-8:00 am 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.6% 65.6% 34.4% 8:00-9:00 am 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.7% 24.0% 45.8% 54.2% 9:00-10:00 am 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 10:00-11:00 am 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 11:00-12:00 pm 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.8% 26.8% 73.2% 12:00-1:00 pm 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1:00-2:00 pm 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2:00-3:00 pm 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 50.5% 83.9% 16.1% 3:00-4:00 pm 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 4:00-5:00 pm 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 5:00-6:00 pm 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 28.3% 28.3% 71.7% 6:00-7:00 pm 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total % 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 17.1% 22.6% 77.4%
36 Table 2C-5: "Adjusted" O-D Percentages from Site 5 - Southbound Direction (based on inbound traffic) Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 5 - SB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.9% 4.6% 0.0% 4.9% 13.5% 86.5% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 3.9% 0.0% 11.3% 24.9% 75.1% 9:00-10:00 am % 1.0% 5.9% 0.8% 10.4% 31.5% 68.5% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.9% 3.3% 1.9% 8.1% 29.3% 70.7% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 12.1% 19.6% 80.4% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 17.4% 31.4% 68.6% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.8% 3.4% 0.0% 12.1% 24.9% 75.1% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.6% 2.7% 0.0% 10.0% 23.9% 76.1% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.6% 7.8% 0.6% 9.3% 22.8% 77.2% 4:00-5:00 pm % 1.5% 9.2% 1.6% 8.6% 26.6% 73.4% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 6:00-7:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total 1, % 0.5% 3.9% 0.4% 8.8% 20.9% 79.1% Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 5 - SB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.0% 10.2% 0.0% 11.0% 41.9% 58.1% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 8.1% 0.0% 8.6% 49.2% 50.8% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 53.6% 46.4% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.2% 73.8% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 7.1% 37.2% 62.8% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.5% 50.0% 50.0% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.0% 4.4% 4.1% 15.2% 36.8% 63.2% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.1% 44.3% 55.7% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.3% 74.7% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 6:00-7:00 pm 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total % 0.0% 3.5% 0.7% 6.9% 32.0% 68.0%
37 Table 2C-6: "Adjusted" O-D Percentages from Site 6 - Westbound Direction (based on inbound traffic) Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 6 - WB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.7% 10.5% 0.0% 2.9% 14.7% 85.3% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.8% 17.8% 0.0% 6.5% 25.8% 74.2% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 15.0% 6.5% 4.4% 25.9% 74.1% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.0% 12.2% 6.6% 5.8% 25.3% 74.7% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 11.5% 5.0% 6.8% 23.3% 76.7% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 12.8% 3.2% 5.5% 22.6% 77.4% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 11.7% 5.8% 7.4% 26.2% 73.8% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.5% 12.2% 4.5% 5.7% 22.8% 77.2% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.4% 13.0% 7.1% 3.0% 24.0% 76.0% 4:00-5:00 pm % 1.3% 5.1% 9.5% 7.2% 23.6% 76.4% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.7% 2.7% 1.1% 1.1% 6.0% 94.0% 6:00-7:00 pm % 0.0% 1.5% 2.4% 0.0% 3.9% 96.1% Total 2, % 0.4% 10.1% 4.3% 4.5% 19.8% 80.2% Vehicle O-D Matches to Output Stations - From Site 6 - WB 7:00-8:00 am % 0.0% 34.7% 0.0% 8.5% 43.2% 56.8% 8:00-9:00 am % 0.0% 32.9% 0.0% 14.3% 47.2% 52.8% 9:00-10:00 am % 0.0% 24.7% 0.0% 6.9% 31.6% 68.4% 10:00-11:00 am % 0.0% 55.2% 3.4% 3.4% 62.0% 38.0% 11:00-12:00 pm % 0.0% 24.8% 0.0% 5.0% 29.8% 70.2% 12:00-1:00 pm % 0.0% 19.9% 5.0% 20.4% 50.2% 49.8% 1:00-2:00 pm % 0.0% 11.2% 0.0% 5.6% 16.9% 83.1% 2:00-3:00 pm % 0.0% 14.8% 9.3% 10.6% 34.8% 65.2% 3:00-4:00 pm % 0.0% 7.8% 15.9% 17.9% 41.5% 58.5% 4:00-5:00 pm % 0.0% 21.6% 8.8% 0.0% 30.5% 69.5% 5:00-6:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 6:00-7:00 pm % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Total % 0.0% 24.3% 3.7% 8.6% 37.0% 63.0%
38 Traffic Along TH 14 Between Mankato and New Ulm The resulting origin-destination pairings for determining the vehicles passing along TH 14 from west of Mankato (Station 7) to west of New Ulm (Station 3) are presented in Tables 3A-3, 3A-6, 3D-6 and 3A-7. Station 7 located just east of Nicollet was the farthest eastern station, Station 3 located just west of New Ulm was the farthest western station, and Station 6 located between New Ulm and Courtland was picked as a mid-point station along the east-west TH 14 Corridor. (Please refer to the map previously shown on page number 2 for the location of these survey stations.) Note that trips passing at each station are matched against trips passing another station in the same direction of travel. Thus, for example, of the 140 passenger vehicles observed passing eastbound at Station 3 between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. (Table 3A-3), 25 passenger vehicles were observed passing eastbound at Station 6 and 16 passenger vehicles were observed passing eastbound at Station 7 within a specified maximum travel time for that inbound time period. (Please refer to the next four following pages, page numbers 36 through 39 for Tables 3A-3, 3A-6, 3D-6 and 3A-7.) The origin-destination pairings presented in Tables 3A-3 through 3A-6 provide an initial estimate of the actual number of vehicle movements between survey stations. These initial estimates need to be adjusted to take into account the fact that less than 100 percent of the license plates of vehicles passing a given survey station were read. The adjustment procedure is identical to the adjustment procedure presented in the previous section on page number 14 and is based on the license plate read rate at the two survey stations being paired. Each observed origin-destination pairing is adjusted in this manner. The adjusted O-D pairings for the east-west TH 14 Corridor traffic study are presented as movement volumes in Tables 3B-3, 3B-6, 3E-6 and 3B-7 and as percentages of inbound volumes in Tables 3C-3, 3C-6, 3F-6 and 3C-7. (Please refer to the next following eight pages, page numbers 40 through 47 for these tables.) The breakdown between and trips from each inbound station to each outbound station was based on the nominal time it would take for a vehicle to travel from one station to another without stopping for any purpose other than for typical traffic conditions. The actual travel time measurements and the nominal non-stop times are presented in Table 1-B previously shown on page number 16. For example, each of the 140 passenger vehicles that passed both Station 3 eastbound and Station 7 eastbound during the 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. period (as shown in Table 3B-3) completed that journey in less than 36 minutes and were considered to be trips. All other observed trips were considered to be trips; that is: vehicles that were observed passing from Station 3 to Station 7 in more than 36 minutes and vehicles that were observed at one station but not at the other were considered to be trips. 35
Technical Memorandum. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives. Summary of Results
Technical Memorandum To: Derek Leuer, MnDOT Traffic Safety Engineer From: Max Moreland, P.E. and Bryant Ficek, P.E., P.T.O.E. Date: February 17, 217 Re: Median Acceleration Lane Usage Purpose of Report
More informationMEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:
MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed
More informationProposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA
Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be
More informationSouthern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017
Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017 The Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission (the RPC ) has been monitoring traffic at 19 locations throughout the southern
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and
More informationWIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT
WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT In order to understand the vehicle classes and groupings, the MnDOT Vehicle Classification Scheme and the Vehicle Classification
More informationINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions
More informationMemorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017
Memorandum engineering planning environmental construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills From:
More informationClean Harbors Canada, Inc.
Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260
More informationTransportation & Traffic Engineering
Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family
More informationKing Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado
Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company
More informationBennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
More informationConstruction Realty Co.
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM : Jeff Pickus Construction Realty Co. Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 f: 847-518-9987 DATE: May 22, 2014 SUBJECT:
More informationTRANSPORTATION REVIEW
TRANSPORTATION REVIEW - PROPOSED MIX OF LAND USES IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY S UNDER THE GRANVILLE BRIDGE POLICIES THAT AIM TO MEET NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS SHOPPING NEEDS AND REDUCE RELIANCE ON AUTOMOBILE
More informationCraig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022
More informationTIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:
TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive
More informationTraffic Feasibility Study
Traffic Feasibility Study Town Center South Robbinsville Township, Mercer County, New Jersey December 19, 2017 Prepared For Robbinsville Township Department of Community Development 2298 Route 33 Robbinsville,
More informationIRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.
IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. February 6, 2013 Mr. David Weil Director of Finance St. Matthew s Parish School 1031 Bienveneda Avenue Pacific Palisades, California 90272 RE: Trip
More informationV. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS
Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion
More informationCounty State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
More informationMILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND
MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,
More informationWIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT
WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT WIM #31 EAST GRAND FORKS MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 2015 WIM Site Location WIM #31 is located on US 2 at mile post 8.0, southeast of
More informationCounty State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
More informationOrigin-Destination and Traffic Circulation Study
Origin-Destination and Traffic Circulation udy Trunk Highway 43 Bridge Area Winona, Minnesota SEH No. MNT06 105869 February 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...1 Page 2.0 Origin-Destination
More informationAPPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report
APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska
More informationLAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More informationSection 5.0 Traffic Information
Section 5.0 Traffic Information 10.0 TRANSPORTATION MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. (MDM) has prepared an evaluation of transportation impacts for the proposed evaluation for the expansion of the
More informationTRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS NAPA FLEA MARKET COUNTY OF NAPA Prepared for: Tom Harding Napa-Vallejo Flea Market 33 Kelly Road American Canyon, CA 9453 Prepared by: 166 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 21 Walnut Creek,
More informationZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,
More informationWIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT
WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT In order to understand the vehicle classes and groupings the Mn/DOT Vehicle Classification Scheme and the Vehicle Classification Groupings
More informationMadison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans
Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans This paper presents a description of the proposed BRT operations plan for use in the Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study. The objective is
More informationProject Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013
MnDOT Contract No. 998 Work Order No.47 213 Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/3/213 TASK #4:
More informationINTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION Trunk Highway 22 and CSAH 21 (E Hill Street/Shanaska Creek Road) Kasota, Le Sueur County, Minnesota November 2018 Trunk Highway 22 and Le Sueur CSAH 21 (E Hill Street/Shanaska
More informationInterstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output
NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2015 Simulation Output Technical
More informationVolume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared
More informationWIM #48 is located on CSAH 5 near Storden in Cottonwood county.
WIM Site Location WIM #48 is located on CSAH 5 near Storden in Cottonwood county. System Operation WIM #48 was operational for the entire month of August 2017. Volume was computed using all monthly data.
More informationRE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road
James J. Copeland, P.Eng. GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 May 31, 2018 Ellen O Hara, P.Eng. Project Engineer DesignPoint Engineering & Surveying Ltd. 200 Waterfront
More informationCharacterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment
Department of Public Works Inyo County, California Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment Segment Name: _Lone Pine No. 1_ Purpose: Which of the following does the combined-use segment
More informationINTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
More informationWIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT
WIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT In order to understand the vehicle classes and groupings the Mn/DOT Vehicle Classification Scheme and the Vehicle Class Groupings for Forecasting
More informationMINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015
5500 New Albany Road Columbus, Ohio 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Fax: 614.775.4800 Toll Free: 1-888-775-EMHT emht.com 2015-1008 MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES September 2, 2015 Engineers
More informationAECOM 30 Leek Cres., 4 th Floor Richmond Hill, ON L4B 4N4 Canada
\ AECOM 30 Leek Cres., 4 th Floor Richmond Hill, ON L4B 4N4 Canada www.aecom.com 905-882-4401 tel 905-882-4399 fax Memorandum To CC Subject Peter Dorton (MTO), Eric Terro (MTO) Olga Garces (MTO) Page 1
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More informationAVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE
AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE EXISTING CONDITIONS (1) NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE () Compared to existing conditions Peak Hour/Train Scenario No Train 1 With Train No
More informationLCPS Valley Service Center
Traffic Impact Study LCPS Valley Service Center Loudoun County, Virginia November 4, 2015 Prepared For: Loudoun County Public Schools 21000 Education Court Ashburn, VA 20148 Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut
More informationIntroduction and Background Study Purpose
Introduction and Background The Brent Spence Bridge on I-71/75 across the Ohio River is arguably the single most important piece of transportation infrastructure the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI) region.
More informationAppendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability
(http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp) Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability This report is a supplement
More informationFigure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd
Abbreviated Study District: 12 County: Geauga Route: SR 44 Section: 1.58 GEA 44 1.58 213 HSP # 47 (Rural Intersection) Prepared April 23, 215 By Bryan Emery Existing Conditions This study contains the
More informationTRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA
TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM 34 CIVIC CENTER BOULEVARD PHILADELPHIA, PA 1987 (61)
More informationHeavy Truck Conflicts at Expressway On-Ramps Part 1
Heavy Truck Conflicts at Expressway On-Ramps Part 1 Posting Date: 7-Dec-2016; Revised 14-Dec-2016 Figure 1: Every day vast numbers of large and long trucks must enter smoothly into high speed truck traffic
More informationTraffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project
Memo To: Paul DiDonato, ATI Architects and Engineers From: David Parisi, PE and Ashley Tam, EIT Date: February 23, 216 Subject: Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality
More informationLacey Gateway Residential Phase 1
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West
More informationTraffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...
More informationAPPENDIX B Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,
More informationSTH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report
#233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald
More informationNovember 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS
161-12598 Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway Bedford, NS B4A 1C1 [Via Email: tabrizi@tabrizi.com] RE: Traffic Impact Statement Dear Mr. Tabrizi: Plans are being prepared for
More informationMERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1
MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationThe major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:
3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown
More informationAppendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project
Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version
More informationCommercial Vehicle Survey: Traffic and Vehicle Classification Summary
TRANSPORTATION Final Report The Preparation of a Northern Ontario and Commercial Vehicle Origin-Destination Survey Commercial Vehicle Survey: Traffic and Vehicle Classification Summary Submitted to Ministry
More informationPassenger Vehicle Survey: Traffic and Vehicle Classification Summary
TRANSPORTATION Final Report The Preparation of a Northern Ontario and Commercial Vehicle Origin-Destination Survey Vehicle Survey: Traffic and Vehicle Classification Summary Submitted to Ministry of Transportation,
More informationEvaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)
Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs) 26 th Annual Transportation Research Conference Saint Paul RiverCentre May 20, 2015 Presentation Outline
More informationWIM #40 US 52, MP S. ST. PAUL, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT
WIM #40 US 52, MP 126.8 S. ST. PAUL, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT In order to understand the vehicle classes and groupings the Mn/DOT Vehicle Classification Scheme and the Vehicle Class Groupings for Forecasting
More informationQuantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:
6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration
More informationAppendix J Traffic Impact Study
MRI May 2012 Appendix J Traffic Impact Study Level 2 Traffic Assessment Limited Impact Review Appendix J [This page was left blank intentionally.] www.sgm-inc.com Figure 1. Site Driveway and Trail Crossing
More informationAppendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Teichert Boca Quarry Expansion Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for Teichert Aggregates Prepared by TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
More informationAttachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum
Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum Sounder Yard and Shops Facility Project Transportation Technical Memorandum March 25, 216 Prepared for: Sound Transit Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff
More informationVOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Project Background... 2 Conditions... 2 Findings... 3 Recommendations... 4 Introduction... 6
More informationProposed Hotel and Restaurant Development
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering
More informationTraffic Engineering Study
Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested
More informationKing County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.
King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...
More informationDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation
More informationProposed Lowe s Home Improvement Center
Traffic Impact and Access Study Proposed Lowe s Home Improvement Center Dennis, Massachusetts Prepared for Prepared by Lowe s Home Centers, Inc. 1605 Curtis Bridge Road Wilkesboro, North Carolina 28697
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED
More informationRyan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report
March 6, 2015 Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY 10580 RE: JMC Project 14108 Boston Post Road Roundabout Boston Post Road and Parsons Street City of Rye, NY Dear Ryan:
More informationTrunk Highway 13 Corridor Study Update Existing and No-Build Conditions Technical Memo #2B: Traffic Forecasts and Operations Analysis SEH No.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Molly McCartney MnDOT Project Manager Haifeng Xiao, PE Tom Sohrweide, PE, PTOE DATE: November 27, 2012 RE: Trunk Highway 13 Corridor Study Update Existing and No-Build Conditions
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. November 2009 Traffic Impact
More information2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017
Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.
More informationTraffic and Toll Revenue Estimates
The results of WSA s assessment of traffic and toll revenue characteristics of the proposed LBJ (MLs) are presented in this chapter. As discussed in Chapter 1, Alternatives 2 and 6 were selected as the
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION Chapel Hill, North Carolina FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. December 2010
More informationEvaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405
Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405 From the SE 8 th St. Interchange in Bellevue to the SR 167 Interchange in Renton January 2000 By Hien Trinh Edited by Jason Gibbens Northwest Region Traffic Systems
More informationRICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.
RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting
More informationTransit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT
Delcan Corporation Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX D Microsimulation Traffic Modeling Report March 2010 March 2010 Appendix D CONTENTS 1.0 STUDY CONTEXT... 2 Figure 1 Study Limits... 2
More informationSubarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.
Subarea Study Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project Final Version 1 Washington County June 12, 214 SRF No. 138141 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Forecast Methodology
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois
Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,
More informationBARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.
More informationWIM #40 is located on US 52 near South St. Paul in Dakota county.
WIM Site Location WIM #40 is located on US 52 near South St. Paul in Dakota county. System Operation WIM #40 was operational for the entire month of November 2017. Volume was computed using all monthly
More informationInterstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results
NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2025 Simulation Results
More informationProposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment
Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment Town of Hyde Park Dutchess County, New York Prepared for: T-Rex Hyde Park Owner LLC 500 Mamroneck Avenue, Suite 300 Harrison, NY 10528 June 21, 2017
More informationWIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.
SEPTEMBER 2016 WIM Site Location WIM #37 is located on I-94 near Otsego in Wright county. The WIM is located only on the westbound (WB) side of I-94, meaning that all data mentioned in this report pertains
More informationSimulating Trucks in CORSIM
Simulating Trucks in CORSIM Minnesota Department of Transportation September 13, 2004 Simulating Trucks in CORSIM. Table of Contents 1.0 Overview... 3 2.0 Acquiring Truck Count Information... 5 3.0 Data
More informationAppendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis
Appendix 5 Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis 20 MEMORANDUM To: From: Rick Pylman Gary Brooks Bill Fox Date: September 15, 2016 Project: Subject: Haymeadow Evaluation of interim access configuration Currently
More information2016 North Trunk Highway 65 Corridor Coalition Manufacturers Survey
2016 North Trunk Highway 65 Corridor Coalition Manufacturers Survey Purpose The North TH 65 Corridor Coalition is focused on improving transportation access and safety and supporting development along
More informationStudy Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Planned Suitland Parkway Westbound at Stanton Road Southeast
Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Suitland Parkway at Stanton Road SE Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description
More informationProposed Pit Development
July 5, 2017 via email: sam@greenwoodconst.ca CCTA File 114239 Sam Greenwood Greenwood Aggregates 205467 County Road 109 Amaranth, ON L9W 0V1 Re: Proposed Violet Hill Gravel Pit, Town of Mono Traffic Review
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT
Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main
More informationITSMR Research Note. Motorcyclists and Impaired Driving ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION KEY FINDINGS. September 2013
September 2013 KEY FINDINGS F&PI CRASHES INVOLVING IMPAIRED MOTORCYCLISTS 27% of the fatal MC crashes over the five year period, 2008-2012, were alcohol-related. 48% of the alcohol-related F&PI MC crashes
More information