CLINTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION PATRICK MCGAHERAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FACILITY ENERGY REPORT 63 ALLERTON ROAD LEBANON, NJ 08833

Transcription

1 CLINTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION PATRICK MCGAHERAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 63 ALLERTON ROAD LEBANON, NJ FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

2 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST... 2 II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION... 7 III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST... 9 IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Appendix A ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown Appendix B New Jersey Smart Start Program Incentives Appendix C Portfolio Manager Statement of Energy Performance Appendix D Major Equipment List Appendix E Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix F Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 1 of 35

3 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Electric Utility Rate Structure: Third Party Supplier: Natural Gas Utility Provider: Utility Rate Structure: Third Party Supplier: Jersey Central Power & Light General Service Secondary 3 Phase South Jersey Energy Elizabethtown Gas General Delivery- Heat (Dec09-Aug10) General Delivery- ADDQ af (Sept10-Nov10) Amerada Hess Corporation The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 2 of 35

4 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Table 1 Electricity Billing Data ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY Utility Provider: Jersey City Power & Light Rate: General Service Secondary 3 Phase - JC_GS3_01D Meter No: W Customer Number: Third Party Utility Provider: South Jersey Energy TPS Meter / Acct No: N/A MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH DEMAND TOTAL BILL Dec-09 74, $11,083 Jan-10 79, $11,735 Feb-10 71, $10,583 Mar-10 29, $4,869 Apr-10 49, $7,650 May-10 49, $7,564 Jun-10 80, $12,787 Jul-10 23, $3,785 Aug-10 14, $2,586 Sep-10 47, $7,563 Oct-10 51, $8,090 Nov-10 47, $7,504 Totals 618, Max $95,798 AVERAGE DEMAND AVERAGE RATE KW average $0.155 $/kwh 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 3 of 35

5 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 4 of 35

6 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY Utility Provider: Elizabethtown Gas General Delivery - Heat (rate class 231 DEC-AUG) / General Delivery- Rate: ADDQ af (rate class 203) Meter No: Account Number: Third Party Utility Provider: Amerada Hess Corporation TPS Meter No: / MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL Dec-09 6, $6, Jan-10 9, $10, Feb-10 7, $8, Mar-10 5, $5, Apr-10 2, $2, May $1, Jun $ Jul $ Aug $ Sep $ Oct $ Nov-10 3, $3, TOTALS 37, $42, AVERAGE RATE: $1.14 $/THERM 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 5 of 35

7 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 6 of 35

8 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION The Patrick McGaheran Elementary School is located on 63 Allerton Road in Clinton Township, New Jersey. The 67,623 GSF Elementary School was built in 1988 with additions in 1993 and The 1993 addition included additional classrooms and computer lab. The 1996 wing included additional classrooms, music/choral rooms, SGI room, and an administration offices addition. The building is a single story facility comprised of classrooms, library, computer lab, music/choral rooms, faculty room, art room, multi-purpose room, kitchen, administration offices, and expanded boiler room. Occupancy Profile The facility is used primarily for 2 nd and 3 rd grade students. The typical hours of operation for the Patrick McGaheran Elementary School are Monday through Friday between 8 am and 3:30 pm. There are some additional school activities after 3:30 pm. The number of students and staff is 360. Building Envelope Exterior walls for the facility are brick faced with a 12 thick concrete block construction. The amount of insulation within the walls is approximately 2 foam board insulation. The windows throughout the facility are in good condition and appear to be maintained. Typical windows throughout the school are double pane, operable, ¼ clear glass with aluminum frames. Blinds are utilized through the office area of the facility per occupant comfort. The blinds are valuable because they help to reduce heat loss in the winter and reduce solar heat in the summer. The roof is a built-up roof with light color stone covering that includes a 2-inch rigid insulation. HVAC Systems The majority of the building is heated by two 1987 Weil-McLain cast iron sectional hot water boilers that are rated at 3,103 MBH input and 2,452 MBH output at an approximate efficiency of 79%. Hot water is circulated through these sectional boilers by two (2) Taco pumps rated at 245 GPM. The hot water is then conveyed to various hot water coils in the original 1988 sections via four (4) TACO hot water pumps each rated at 50 GPM. The 1993 Addition is heated by two Slant Fin/Caravan modular gas-fired hot water heaters that are rated each at 375 MBH with an output of 300MBH or 80% efficiency. The hot water from this system is pumped to the hot water coils via two (2) Armstrong pumps rated at 160 GPM. Numerous classrooms are heated and cooled by vertical Airedale units that contain hot water coils, DX cooling coils and aircooled condensers. Most of these classrooms units are rated at 3 to 4-Tons. The corridors and toilets are cooled by a Lennox 6-Ton rooftop packaged air conditioning unit while Room 41 is cooled by a Lennox 2-Ton rooftop unit. The administrative offices are cooled by a split system rated at 7.5-Tons with the condenser on the roof. The classroom hallway, the kitchen, multi-purpose room and the cafeteria are heated and ventilated by rooftop H&V units manufactured by Reznor and Trane and range in size from 125 MBH to 392 MBH. The Library is cooled by a 10-Ton split unit with the air handler above the ceiling and the air-cooled 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 7 of 35

9 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School condenser on the roof. Finally, a 5-Ton split air handling unit cools the nurse s office and adjoining offices. Exhaust System Air is exhausted from the toilet rooms through the roof exhausters. The all-purpose room air is exhausted by two large fans interlocked to the rooftop H & V units. A series of rooftop exhaust fans exhaust the air from the classroom corridors, main office, and kitchen. HVAC System Controls The older sections of the school are controlled by pneumatics while the newer air conditioning units are Direct Digital Controls (DDC) with individual controllers and space temperature sensors. Domestic Hot Water Domestic hot water for the restrooms and kitchen is provided by an A. O. Smith gas-fired hot water heater with a 118-gallon capacity and a rated input of 199 MBH. The kitchen dishwasher has an electric hot water booster rated at 36 kw. Lighting Refer to the Investment Grade lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 8 of 35

10 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix. Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 9 of 35

11 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed: 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 10 of 35

12 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Table 1 ECM Financial Summary ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's) ECM NO. DESCRIPTION NET INSTALLATION COST A ANNUAL SAVINGS B SIMPLE PAYBACK (Yrs) SIMPLE LIFETIME ROI ECM #1 Cooling Only RTU Upgrade $13,997 $ % ECM #2 Air Conditioning System Upgrades $48,906 $4, % ECM #3 NEMA Premium Efficient H&V Motor Upgrade $2,494 $ % ECM #4 Exhaust Fan Replacement - NEMA Premium Efficient $3,340 $ % ECM #5 Lighting Upgrade - General $13,905 $3, % ECM #6 Lighting Controls $22,515 $5, % ECM #7 Dishwasher & Booster Heater Upgrade $40,000 $4, % ECM #8 NEMA Premium Efficient Pump Motor Upgrade $12,265 $ % RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's) ECM NO. REM #1 Notes: DESCRIPTION kw Solar Photovoltaic System NET INSTALLATION COST ANNUAL SAVINGS SIMPLE PAYBACK (Yrs) SIMPLE LIFETIME ROI $1,511,100 $96, % A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives. B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 11 of 35

13 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Table 2 ECM Energy Summary ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's) ECM NO. ECM #1 Cooling Only RTU Upgrade 3.4 3, ECM #2 Air Conditioning System Upgrades , ECM #3 NEMA Premium Efficient H&V Motor Upgrade 0.4 1, ECM #4 Exhaust Fan Replacement - NEMA Premium Efficient ECM #5 Lighting Upgrade - General , ECM #6 Lighting Controls , ECM #7 Dishwasher & Booster Heater Upgrade , ECM #8 NEMA Premium Efficient Pump Motor Upgrade 0.6 4, RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's) ECM NO. REM #1 DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION kw Solar Photovoltaic System ELECTRIC DEMAND (KW) ELECTRIC DEMAND (KW) ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION (KWH) ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION (KWH) NATURAL GAS (THERMS) NATURAL GAS (THERMS) 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 12 of 35

14 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Table 3 Facility Project Summary ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ANNUAL ENERGY SAVINGS ($) PROJECT COST ($) SMART START INCENTIVES CUSTOMER COST SIMPLE PAYBACK Cooling Only RTU Upgrade Air Conditioning System Upgrades NEMA Premium Efficient H&V Motor Upgrade Exhaust Fan Replacement - NEMA Premium Efficient $468 $14,435 $438 $13, $4,332 $50,183 $1,278 $48, $301 $2,654 $160 $2, $20 $3,340 $0 $3, Lighting Upgrade - General $3,362 $18,835 $4,930 $13, Lighting Controls $5,147 $24,400 $1,885 $22, Dishwasher & Booster Heater Upgrade NEMA Premium Efficient Pump Motor Upgrade Design / Construction Extras (15%) $4,086 $40,000 $0 $40, $672 $12,725 $460 $12, $13,417 - $13,417 - Total Project $18,387 $179,989 $9,151 $170, Design / Construction Extras is shown as an additional cost for the facility project summary. This cost is included to estimate the costs associated with construction management fees for a larger combined project. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 13 of 35

15 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #1: Cooling Only Rooftop Unit Upgrade Description: The Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Building has two (2) packaged, direct expansion cooling only rooftop unit (RTU). The units cooling efficiencies are as shown below. The unit is past its ASHRAE expected useful service life. The units are in fair to poor condition and are in need of replacement. The efficiencies of the existing units are below today s standards for cooling efficiency. The proposed units are high efficiency one-for-one replacement of the existing unit. The owner should have a professional engineer verify heating and cooling loads prior to moving forward with this ECM. This ECM includes installation of two (2) high efficient packaged rooftop units. The ECM calculations are based on Trane high efficiency model THC072 and Lennox model TCA024 or equivalent. Means Costworks software is used to estimate demolition and labor costs for a generic rooftop AC unit replacement. Calculation Constants Full Load Hours Heating Degree Day Outdoor Design Temp, F Oversize Factor Degree Day Adjustment Factor, Office Electric Cost, $/kwh 900 4, % 0.55 $0.155 Cooling Capacity (Tons) Exist. Cooling EER Proposed Cooling EER Tag RTU RTU C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 14 of 35

16 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Savings for 6 Ton Unit Upgrade: Btu Cooling Tons 12,000 Ton hr 1 EnergySavings Wh EER 1000 kwh OLD 1 EER NEW Full Load Hrs. Demand Savings Energy Savings kwh Hrs of Cooling $ Cooling Cost Savings EnergySavings EnergyUnitCost kwh The calculations are carried out and the results are tabulated in the below table. Tag Cooling Capacity (Tons) Energy Savings (kwh) Demand Savings (kw) Total Energy Cost Saved RTU-1 6 2, $ RTU $ Total 8.0 3, $ From the NJ Smart Start Program appendix, the packaged unit replacement falls under the category Electric Unitary HVAC and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER) at or above The program incentives are calculated as follows: Smart Start Incentive Cooling Tons $ / Ton Incentive Central DX AC Systems <5.4 tons, minimum 14.0 SEER, $92/ton >5.4 tons to tons, minimum 11.5 EER, $73/ton >11.25 tons to 20 tons, minimum 11.5 EER, $79/ton Total Cooling Tag Capacity Incentives (Tons) RTU-1 6 $438 RTU-2 2 $0 $438 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 15 of 35

17 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Summary: ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $14,435 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $438 Net Installation Cost ($): $13,997 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $468 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $468 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 29.9 Simple Lifetime ROI -49.9% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $7,014 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -8% Net Present Value (NPV) ($8,414.39) 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 16 of 35

18 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #2: Air Conditioning System Upgrades Description: The Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Building is air conditioned, in part, by two split system AC units. The units currently installed are past their ASHRAE service life and can be replaced with new units with much higher efficiency. New air conditioners provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and refrigerants. This ECM includes one-to-one replacement of the older air conditioning units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of this ECM can be found in the table below: TAG MANUF. QTY. MODEL # COOLING CAPACITY (TONS) CURRENT EER CU Lennox 1 HS Y CU Trane 1 RAUC-C The manufacturers used as the basis for design is McQuay. This ECM includes replacement of the outdoor condensing units and associated indoor air handling unit. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below: Energy Savings, kwh Cooling Capacity, BTU Hr 1 1 Operation Hours EER O EER N 1000 W kwh Demand Savings, kw Energy Savings kwh Hours of Cooling Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kwh Cost of Electricity $ kwh 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 17 of 35

19 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Existing Equipment COOLING TAG MANUF. QTY. MODEL # COOLING ENERGY DEMAND COOLING CURRENT CAPACITY NEW EER SAVINGS SAVINGS COSTS EER (TONS) (KWH) (KW) SAVINGS CU Lennox 1 HS Y , $2,207 CU Trane 1 RAUC-C , $2,125 TOTAL , $4,332 Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category Unitary HVAC Split System and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows: Smart Start Incentive UNIT DESCRIPTION CoolingTons $/TonIncentive SPLIT SYSTEM AC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY PROPOSED REBATE UNIT EFFICIENCY CAPACITY $/TON TONS TOTAL REBATE $ to < 20 tons 11.5 EER $1,278 TOTAL 17.5 $1,278 Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below. There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM. Existing Equipment TAG MANUF. QTY. MODEL # TOTAL ENERGY SAVINGS TOTAL INSTALLED COSTS INCENTIVES NET INSTALLED COST SIMPLE PAYBACK CU Lennox 1 HS Y $2,207 $22,848 $548 $22, CU Trane 1 RAUC-C106 $2,125 $27,335 $730 $26, TOTAL $4,332 $50,183 $1,278 $48, C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 18 of 35

20 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Summary: ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $50,183 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,278 Net Installation Cost ($): $48,906 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,332 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,332 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 11.3 Simple Lifetime ROI 32.9% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $64,985 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 4% Net Present Value (NPV) $2, C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 19 of 35

21 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #3: NEMA Premium Efficient H&V Motor Upgrade Description: Replacing the old electric motors with new efficient motor is a simple change that can provide substantial savings. The Heat and Ventilation unit motors are past their ASHRAE expected useful service life and should be replaced. Existing electric motors equal to or greater than one horsepower ranged from 79.1 to 84.0% efficient. The improved efficiency of the NEMA premium efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate hours per week, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. This energy conservation measure would replace all motors equal to or greater than 1 HP with NEMA Premium Efficient Motors. NEMA Premium is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today. Using MotorMaster+, Version 4, the energy & cost savings were calculated for the fan/pump motors in this facility that are greater than or equal to 1 HP. Energy Savings Calculations: Data used in the calculation: 1 HP = Watt Load Factor = 80% Cost of electricity = $0.155 / kwh Annual Hours of Operations = 4888 hrs Motor Operating Cost = {0.746 Watt/HP x Motor HP x Load Factor x Hours of Operation x Cost of Electricity] Motor Efficiency The Smart Start Incentive for 1 1/2 hp TEFC is $50 per motor and for 3 hp TEFC is $60 per motor. Simple Payback, years = (Installation Cost-Incentive) / Savings kwh saved = Savings / Electric Cost,$/kWh kw saved = Power Saved, kwh / hrs./yr. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 20 of 35

22 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Equipment Tag Motor HP NEMA Premium Efficient Motor Replacement Hours / Year Existing Efficiency NEMA Premium Efficiency kw Savings kwh Savings Cost Savings HV % 88.5% $43.6 HV % 88.5% $97 HV % 89.5% ,034 $160 Total Savings ,940 $301 The following table outlines the motor replacement plan for this facility: MOTOR REPLACEMENT PLAN Motor HP QTY ENCL. TYPE No. of POLEs INSTALLED Cost ** Incentive TOTAL COST TOTAL SAVINGS Simple Payback TEFC 4-Pole $795 $50 $745 $ TEFC 4-Pole $795 $50 $745 $ TEFC 4-Pole $1,063 $60 $1,003 $ Totals: $160 $2,494 $ ** Cost before the SmartStart Buildings incentive is applied. Energy Savings Summary: ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $2,654 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $160 Net Installation Cost ($): $2,494 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $301 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $301 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 18 Simple Payback 8.3 Simple Lifetime ROI 117.0% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $5,411 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 10% Net Present Value (NPV) $1, C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 21 of 35

23 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #4: Exhaust Fan Replacement - NEMA Premium Efficient Motor Description: Replacing old exhaust fans with new exhaust fans with efficient motors is a simple change that can provide substantial savings. Existing electric motors equal to or greater than one horsepower ranged from 78 to 93% efficient. The improved efficiency of the NEMA premium efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate hours per week, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. This energy conservation measure would replace all motors with NEMA Premium Efficient Motors. NEMA Premium is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today. Energy Savings Calculations: Data used in the calculation: Annual Hours of Operations = 1,000 hrs 1 HP = Watt Load Factor = 85% Cost of electricity = $0.155 / kwh The following table outlines the NEMA Premium Efficiency Motor replacement energy savings for this facility: MOTOR HP NEMA PREMIUM EFFICIENT MOTOR REPLACEMENT EXISTING EFFICIENCY NEMA PREMIUM EFFICIENCY KW SAVINGS KWH SAVINGS COST SAVINGS 1 1/2 79.1% 88.5% $ $20 The 1.5 hp NEMA Premium Efficiency Fan and Motor installed cost is $3,340. There is no SmartStart Building incentive for replacing with a NEMA Premium Efficiency 1 horsepower or greater and less than 2000 hours annually. The following table outlines the motor replacement plan for this facility: 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 22 of 35

24 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School FAN REPLACEMENT PLAN MOTOR HP QTY ENCL. TYPE NO. OF POLES INSTALLED COST ** TOTAL COST TOTAL SAVINGS SIMPLE PAYBACK 1 1/2 1 TEFC 4-Pole $3,340 $3,340 $ Totals: $3,340 $ ** Net Cost before the SmartStart Buildings incentive is applied. Energy Savings Summary: ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $3,340 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0 Net Installation Cost ($): $3,340 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $20 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $20 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 20 Simple Payback Simple Lifetime ROI -88.1% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $396 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -15% Net Present Value (NPV) ($3,045.85) This ECM shows that a smaller horsepower motor with little use does not have substantial savings. In this case, the Owner can replace the kitchen hood exhaust fan at or near failure because there is no payback and should be replaced when necessary. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 23 of 35

25 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade Description: All of the interior lighting at the Patrick McGaheran School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes replacement of any incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps. Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL s) were designed to be direct replacements for the standard incandescent lamps which are common to table lamps, spot lights, hi-hats, bathroom vanity lighting, etc. The light output of the CFL has been designed to resemble the incandescent lamp. The color rendering index (CRI) of the CFL is much higher than standard fluorescent lighting, and therefore provides a much truer light. The CFL is available in a myriad of shapes and sizes depending on the specific application. Typical replacements are: a 13-Watt CFL for a 60-Watt incandescent lamp, an 18-Watt CFL for a 75-Watt incandescent lamp, and a 26-Watt CFL for a 100-Watt incandescent lamp. The CFL is also available for a number of brightness colors that is indicated by the Kelvin rating. A 2700K CFL is the warmest color available and is closest in color to the incandescent lamp. CFL s are also available in 3000K, 3500K, and 4100K. The 4100K would be the brightest or coolest output. A CFL can be chosen to screw right into your existing fixtures, or hardwired into your existing fixtures. Where the existing fixture is controlled by a dimmer switch, the CFL bulb must be compatible with a dimmer switch. In some locations the bulb replacement will need to be tested to make sure the larger base of the CFL will fit into the existing fixture. The energy usage of an incandescent compared to a compact fluorescent approximately 3 to 4 times greater. In addition to the energy savings, compact fluorescent fixtures burn-hours are 8 to 15 times longer than incandescent fixtures ranging from 6,000 to 15,000 burn-hours compared to incandescent fixtures ranging from 750 to 1000 burn-hours. However, the maintenance savings due to reduced lamp replacement is offset by the higher cost of the CFL s compared to the incandescent lamps. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: From the NJ Smart Start Incentive Appendix, the retrofit of existing 32 watt T-8 system to reduced wattage (28w/25w 4') warrants the following incentive: $10 per fixture. Smart Start Incentive # of 1 4 lampfixtures $ $10 $4,930 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 24 of 35

26 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Summary: ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $18,835 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $4,930 Net Installation Cost ($): $13,905 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,362 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,362 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 4.1 Simple Lifetime ROI 262.7% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0 Simple Lifetime Savings $50,430 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 23% Net Present Value (NPV) $26, C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 25 of 35

27 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #6: Lighting Controls Upgrade Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the Patrick McGaheran School are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off. Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways, document posted for public use April The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report: Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms and large bathrooms. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations: Energy Savings % Savings Controlled Light Energy kwh/yr 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 26 of 35

28 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Savings. Energy Savings $ kwh kwh Ave Elec Cost Cost and Incentives: Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows: Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - with 2-pole power - Remote Mount $450 per installation $150 per installation $500 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor Smart Start Incentive Smart Start Incentive Energy Savings Summary: # of wall mount $ 20 (#of ceiling mount $35) 12 wall mount $ 20 (47 ceiling mount $35) $1,885 ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $24,400 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,885 Net Installation Cost ($): $22,515 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,147 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,147 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 4.4 Simple Lifetime ROI 242.9% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $77,205 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 22% Net Present Value (NPV) $38, C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 27 of 35

29 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #7: Dishwasher & Booster Heater Upgrade Description: The original dishwasher is a Hobart model CRS-66 and installed in The existing booster water heater is a Hatco model C-36 and is twenty three years old and in fair to poor condition. Both the dishwasher and booster water heater are past their useful service life and should be replaced. Since this equipment was installed, there have been improvements made in the washing technology that results in about a 50% water savings. The reduced water requirements translates to less water heating, less water treating and less chemicals that will be used and dumped down the drain. There have been improvements in electric motor technologies. Existing electric motors equal to or greater than one horsepower ranged from 76.7% to 86.5% efficient. The improved efficiency of the NEMA premium efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Replacing an electric water heater with a natural gas water heater would provide a fuel savings. However, there are several obstacles that must be overcome in order to use gas heat. First, there is a very large premium cost for the natural gas fired booster water heater. The Hatco model PMG-200 has a $7,966 list price premium over the Model C-36 electric heater. Second, the gas unit is larger than the electric unit so additional floor space would be used. Third, a new gas vent would need to be installed and extended up through the roof. Fourth, a natural gas line would need to be extended for the new gas unit. Last, in a discussion with a kitchen equipment consultant and sales representative at Urie Associates, they strongly advise against the use of any gas booster heater. This advice is based on thirty-plus years of experience and their experience is the gas booster heaters need frequent service and is much more costly for maintenance in addition to aggravation of owners with down time. Therefore, CEG will recommend using an electric booster heater for this ECM. This energy conservation measure would replace the dishwasher and booster water heater. This ECM will use the Hobart model CL44e dishwasher with a Hobart optional 30 kw electric booster water heater for the basis of this ECM or approved equal. The existing dishwasher has a 1 HP motor and the new unit will have a 2 hp motor. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 28 of 35

30 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Calculations: Motor Operating Cost = {0.746 Watt/HP x Motor HP x Load Factor x Hours of Operation x Cost of Electricity] Motor Efficiency Equipment Tag Existing Motor HP NEMA Premium Efficient Motor Replacement New NEMA Existing kw Motor Premium Efficiency Savings HP Efficiency kwh Savings Cost Savings Dishwasher % 86.5% $50.8 Total Savings $51 * Net increase due to increased equipment hp. Water Usage = load/day x gal/load = gallons / day The cost of dishwasher detergent and chemicals is approximately $6,629 / year. Savings will be approximately 1/3 or $2,210 / year. The water heating requirement is: power saved = Temp. Rise x 8.33 lbs/gallon x gallons/yr saved. / (3413 btuh/kw x 98% efficient) Water Heating Cost Saved = saved kwh / year x $0.155/kWh Total Annual Power Saved (kwh/yr) = Heating power + Motor power kw saved = saved kwh / run hrs./yr. Installed Cost of dishwasher with optional booster water heater is $23,415. This motor does not qualify for an incentive because the operation hours are less than 2000 hour per year. Simple Payback = Installed cost / annual savings 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 29 of 35

31 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School DISHWASHER & BOOSTER HEATER CALCULATIONS ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS ECM INPUTS - Dishwasher Model Hobart CRS-66 Hobart CL44e - DishwasherFial Rinse Water Usage (Gal/rinse) Temperature Rise (⁰F) Loads/Day Dishwashing (Hours / Day) Dishwashing (Days / Week) Dishwashing (Weeks / Year) Dishwasher Motor HP Water Usage (Gallons / Day) Maximum Water Usage (Gallons / Hour) Annual Water Usage (Gallons / year) 11,016 4,464 6,552 Heating capacity required (kw) Booster Heater Model Hatco C-36 Hatco C-30 - Booster Heater Power Demand (kw) Average Heating Power Consumption (kwh/day) Water Treatment, Detergent/Sanitizing Cost ($) $6,629 $3,679 $2,950 Elec Cost ($/kwh) $0.155 $ ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS Annual Heating Power Consumption (kwh/year) 17, , ,605.7 Annual Pump Motor Power Consumption (kwh/yr) 1, Total Annual Power Consumption (kwh / yr) 18, , ,327.0 Demand (kw) Electric Heating Energy Cost ($) $1,024 Electric Motor Energy Cost ($) $112 Total Annual Electric Energy Cost ($) $2,841 $1,705 $1,136 Annual Water Consumption (Gallons / Year) 11,016 4,464 6,552 Water Treatment, Detergent/Sanitizing Cost ($) $6,629 $3,679 $2,950 Total Cost/Savings ($) $9,470 $5,384 $4,086 COMMENTS: 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 30 of 35

32 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Summary: ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $40,000 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0 Net Installation Cost ($): $40,000 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $2,950 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,136 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,086 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 9.8 Simple Lifetime ROI 53.2% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $44,250 Simple Lifetime Savings $61,290 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 6% Net Present Value (NPV) $8, C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 31 of 35

33 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School ECM #8: NEMA Premium Efficient Motor Upgrade Description: Replacing the old electric motors with new efficient motor is a simple change that can provide substantial savings. The zone pump motors are past their ASHRAE expected useful service life and should be replaced. Existing electric motors equal to or greater than one horsepower ranged from 77 to 84% efficient. The improved efficiency of the NEMA premium efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate hours per week, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. This energy conservation measure would replace all motors equal to or greater than 1 HP with NEMA Premium Efficient Motors. NEMA Premium is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today. Using MotorMaster+, Version 4, the energy & cost savings were calculated for the fan/pump motors in this facility that are greater than or equal to 1 HP. Energy Savings Calculations: Electric Utility Cost = $0.155 / kwh ASHRAE Newark, NJ 4888 HDD65 10 F Heating Design Temp 3748 CDD50 90 F DB/73 F WB Cooling Design Temp Motor Operating Cost = {0.746 Watt/HP x Motor HP x Load Factor x Hours of Operation x Cost of Electricity] Motor Efficiency Simple Payback = (Installation Cost-Incentive) / Annual Savings = Years for pay back kwh saved = Annual Cost Savings / Utility cost/kwh = kwh saved 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 32 of 35

34 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Equipment Tag Motor HP NEMA Premium Efficient Motor Replacement Hours / Year Existing Efficiency NEMA Premium Efficiency kw Savings kwh Savings Cost Savings P-1A % 89.5% $88.1 P-2A % 89.5% $88 P-1B % 86.5% $100 P-2B % 86.5% $100 P-1C % 85.5% $55 P-2C % 85.5% $55 P % 89.5% $93 P % 89.5% $93 Total Savings ,333 $672 Primary/backup: each pump sees 1/2 of the heating hours, kw total savings is 1/2 of all pumps kw savings The following table outlines the motor replacement plan for this facility: MOTOR REPLACEMENT PLAN Motor HP QTY ENCL. TYPE No. of POLEs INSTALLED Cost Incentive TOTAL COST ** TOTAL SAVINGS 5 1 ODP 4-Pole $1,997 $60 $1,937 $ ODP 4-Pole $1,997 $60 $1,937 $ ODP 4-Pole $1,596 $60 $1,536 $ TEFC 4-Pole $1,596 $60 $1,536 $ TEFC 4-Pole $1,207 $50 $1,157 $ TEFC 4-Pole $1,207 $50 $1,157 $ TEFC 4-Pole $1,562 $60 $1,502 $ TEFC 4-Pole $1,562 $60 $1,502 $93.03 Totals: $460 $12,265 $672 ** Net Cost after the SmartStart Buildings incentive is applied. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 33 of 35

35 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Energy Savings Summary: ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $12,725 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $460 Net Installation Cost ($): $12,265 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $672 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $672 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 10 Simple Payback 18.3 Simple Lifetime ROI -45.2% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $6,716 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -10% Net Present Value (NPV) ($6,536.27) 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 34 of 35

36 Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less. A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%. B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors. C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output. D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ. E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy. F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode. 9C11002 August 4, 2011 FINAL Page 35 of 35

37 Appendix APPENDIX A

38 APPENDIX A 1 of 1 ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY ECM NO. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL INSTALLATION COST LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES NET INSTALLATION COST ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP Clinton Township BOE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School YEARLY SAVINGS LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS ENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime) LIFETIME MAINTENANCE SAVINGS (Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime) LIFETIME ROI (Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) SIMPLE PAYBACK (Net cost / Yearly Savings) INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($) NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) ECM #1 Cooling Only RTU Upgrade $9,102 $5,333 $438 $13,997 $468 $0 $ $7,014 $0-49.9% % ($8,414.39) ECM #2 Air Conditioning System Upgrades $37,800 $12,383 $1,278 $48,906 $4,332 $0 $4, $64,985 $0 32.9% % $2, ECM #3 NEMA Premium Efficient H&V Motor Upgrade $1,941 $713 $160 $2,494 $301 $0 $ $5,411 $ % % $1, ECM #4 Exhaust Fan Replacement - NEMA Premium Efficient Motor $3,040 $300 $0 $3,340 $20 $0 $20 20 $396 $0-88.1% % ($3,045.85) ECM #5 Lighting Upgrade - General $15,068 $3,767 $4,930 $13,905 $3,362 $0 $3, $50,430 $ % % $26, ECM #6 Lighting Controls $19,520 $4,880 $1,885 $22,515 $5,147 $0 $5, $77,205 $ % % $38, ECM #7 Dishwasher & Booster Heater Upgrade $28,000 $12,000 $0 $40,000 $1,136 $2,950 $4, $61,290 $44, % % $8, ECM #8 NEMA Premium Efficient Pump Motor Upgrade $7,404 $5,321 $460 $12,265 $672 $0 $ $6,716 $0-45.2% % ($6,536.27) REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY REM # kw Solar Photovoltaic System $1,511,100 $0 $0 $1,511,100 $29,486 $66,582 $96, $2,401,692 $1,664, % % $161, Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period. 2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate 3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period. ECM LIFETIME

39 Appendix APPENDIX B

40 Appendix B Page 1 of BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY PHONE: (856) FAX: (856) SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011: Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path) Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm gas or electric Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat (Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH Gas Fired Boilers MBH Gas Heating $300 per unit $1.75 per MBH Gas Fired Boilers MBH $1.00 per MBH Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path) Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE 92%

41 Appendix B Page 2 of 4 Ground Source Heat Pumps $450 per ton, EER 16 Closed Loop $600 per ton, EER 18 $750 per ton, EER 20 Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $ $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH $300 per unit Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps $10 per fixture w/electronic Ballast in Existing (1-4 lamps) Facilities Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/electronic Ballast in $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps) Existing Facilities Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL) bulb T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4, 1-4 lamps) Lamp & ballast replacement Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent Metal Halide w/pulse Start Including Parking Lot $7 per bulb $10 per fixture $25 - $30 per fixture $25 per fixture T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture HID 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator (must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system) HID 100w Replacement with new HID 100w $50 per fixture $70 per fixture

42 Appendix B Page 3 of 4 LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw Prescriptive Lighting - LED $20 per fixture $10 per fixture LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture LED Wall-wash Lights LED Recessed Down Lights LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area and Roadway Luminaries LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $30 per fixture $35 per fixture $175 per fixture $175 per fixture LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture LED Parking Garage Luminaries LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $100 per fixture $50 per fixture $150 per fixture $150 per fixture LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture LED Fuel Pump Canopy LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium and low temperature display case $100 per fixture $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

43 Appendix B Page 4 of 4 Lighting Controls Occupancy Sensors Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled Lighting Controls HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors $40 per electronic communicated motor (replacing shaded pole motors in refrigerator/freezer cases) Other Equipment Incentives $1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more Performance Lighting energy efficient than ASHRAE for New Construction and Complete Renovation Custom Electric and Gas Equipment not prescriptive Incentives $0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year payback on estimated savings. Custom Measures Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

44 Appendix APPENDIX C

45 Appendix C Page 1 of 7 OMB No STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Building ID: For 12-month Period Ending: November 30, Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: July 25, 2011 Facility Patrick McGaheran Elementary School 63 Allerton Road Lebanon, NJ Year Built: 1988 Gross Floor Area (ft 2 ): 67,623 Facility Owner Clinton Township Board of Education PO Box 6 Annandale, NJ Primary Contact for this Facility Patricia Leonhardt PO Box 6 Annandale, NJ Energy Performance Rating 2 (1-100) 22 Site Energy Use Summary 3 Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 2,110,527 Natural Gas (kbtu) 4 3,739,940 Total Energy (kbtu) 5,850,467 Energy Intensity 5 Site (kbtu/ft 2 /yr) 87 Source (kbtu/ft 2 /yr) 162 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO 2 e/year) 498 Electric Distribution Utility Jersey Central Power & Light Co [FirstEnergy Corp] National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 67 National Average Source EUI 125 % Difference from National Average Source EUI 30% Building Type K-12 School Stamp of Certifying Professional Based on the conditions observed at the time of my visit to this building, I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate. Meets Industry Standards 6 for Indoor Environmental Conditions: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A Certifying Professional Michael Fischetti 520 South Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA. 2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR. 3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period. 4. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period. 5. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality. The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) and welcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C EPA Form

46 Appendix C Page 2 of 7 ENERGY STAR Data Checklist for Commercial Buildings In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlying the building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well as its total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager. Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance. NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note. CRITERION Building Name Type Location Single Structure VALUE AS ENTERED IN PORTFOLIO MANAGER Patrick McGaheran Elementary School K-12 School 63 Allerton Road, Lebanon, NJ Single Facility Patrick McGaheran E.S. (K-12 School) CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED IN PORTFOLIO MANAGER Gross Floor Area Open Weekends? Number of PCs Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezer units Presence of cooking facilities 67,623 Sq. Ft. No 118 (Default) 1 Yes Percent Cooled 30 % Percent Heated 100 % Months 10(Optional) VERIFICATION QUESTIONS Is this the official building name to be displayed in the ENERGY STAR Registry of Labeled Buildings? Is this an accurate description of the space in question? Is this address accurate and complete? Correct weather normalization requires an accurate zip code. Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPs cannot be submitted for multiple-building campuses (with the exception of acute care or children's hospitals) nor can they be submitted as representing only a portion of a building VERIFICATION QUESTIONS Does this square footage include all supporting functions such as kitchens and break rooms used by staff, storage areas, administrative areas, elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Also note that existing atriums should only include the base floor area that it occupies. Interstitial (plenum) space between floors should not be included in the total. Finally gross floor area is not the same as leasable space. Leasable space is a subset of gross floor area. Is this building normally open at all on the weekends? This includes activities beyond the work conducted by maintenance, cleaning, and security personnel. Weekend activity could include any time when the space is used for classes, performances or other school or community activities. If the building is open on the weekend as part of the standard schedule during one or more seasons, the building should select?yes? for open weekends. The?yes? response should apply whether the building is open for one or both of the weekend days. Is this the number of personal computers in the K12 School? Is this the total number of commercial walk-in type freezers and coolers? These units are typically found in storage and receiving areas. Does this school have a dedicated space in which food is prepared and served to students? If the school has space in which food for students is only kept warm and/or served to students, or has only a galley that is used by teachers and staff then the answer is "no". Is this the percentage of the total floor space within the facility that is served by mechanical cooling equipment? Is this the percentage of the total floor space within the facility that is served by mechanical heating equipment? Is this school in operation for at least 8 months of the year? NOTES NOTES Page 1 of 4

47 High School? No Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10, 11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to high school students at all, the user should check 'yes' to 'high school'. For example, if the school teaches to grades K-12 (elementary/middle and high school), the user should check 'yes' to 'high school'. Appendix C Page 3 of 7 Page 2 of 4

48 Appendix C Page 4 of 7 ENERGY STAR Data Checklist for Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Power Generation Plant or Distribution Utility: Jersey Central Power & Light Co [FirstEnergy Corp] Fuel Type: Electricity Meter: Electric (kwh (thousand Watt-hours)) Space(s): Patrick McGaheran E.S. Generation Method: Grid Purchase Start Date End Date Energy Use (kwh (thousand Watt-hours)) 11/01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /28/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /31/ , Electric Consumption (kwh (thousand Watt-hours)) 618, Electric Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 2,110, Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 2,110, Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including all Electricity meters? Fuel Type: Natural Gas Meter: Gas (therms) Space(s): Patrick McGaheran E.S. Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms) 11/01/ /30/2010 3, /01/ /31/ /01/ /30/ /01/ /31/ /01/ /31/ /01/ /30/ /01/ /31/ /01/ /30/2010 2, /01/ /31/2010 5, /01/ /28/2010 7, Page 3 of 4

49 01/01/ /31/2010 9, Appendix C Page 5 of 7 12/01/ /31/2009 6, Gas Consumption (therms) 37, Gas Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 3,739, Total Natural Gas Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 3,739, Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters? Additional Fuels Do the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building? Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility. On-Site Solar and Wind Energy Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located at your facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from this list. All on-site systems must be reported. Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.) Name: Date: Signature: Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR. Page 4 of 4

50 FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA. Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance (SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR. Appendix C Page 6 of 7 Facility Patrick McGaheran Elementary School 63 Allerton Road Lebanon, NJ Facility Owner Clinton Township Board of Education PO Box 6 Annandale, NJ Primary Contact for this Facility Patricia Leonhardt PO Box 6 Annandale, NJ General Information Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft 2 ) 67,623 Year Built 1988 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: November 30, 2010 Facility Space Use Summary Space Type Patrick McGaheran E.S. K-12 School Gross Floor Area(ft2) 67,623 Open Weekends? No Number of PCs d 118 Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezer units 1 Presence of cooking facilities Yes Percent Cooled 30 Percent Heated 100 Months o 10 High School? School District o No Clinton Township Energy Performance Comparison Evaluation Periods Comparisons Performance Metrics Current (Ending Date 11/30/2010) Baseline (Ending Date 11/30/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average Energy Performance Rating N/A 50 Energy Intensity Energy Cost Greenhouse Gas Emissions Site (kbtu/ft2) N/A 67 Source (kbtu/ft2) N/A 125 $/year $ 138, $ 138, $ 83, N/A $ 106, $/ft2/year $ 2.05 $ 2.05 $ 1.24 N/A $ 1.58 MtCO 2 e/year N/A 384 kgco 2 e/ft2/year N/A 5 More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presents energy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes: o - This attribute is optional. d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

51 Statement of Energy Performance 2010 Patrick McGaheran Elementary School 63 Allerton Road Lebanon, NJ Portfolio Manager Building ID: Appendix C Page 7 of 7 The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using the Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA s) Energy Performance Scale of 1 100, with 1 being the least energy efficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark. This building s score Least Efficient Average Most Efficient This building uses 162 kbtu per square foot per year.* *Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending November 2010 Buildings with a score of 75 or higher may qualify for EPA s ENERGY STAR. I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov Date of certification Date Generated: 07/25/2011

52 Appendix APPENDIX D

53 Appendix D Page 1 of 8 MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group Patrick McGaheran School Rooftop / AC Units Tag RTU-1 RTU-2 CU- Unit Type Packaged A/C Unit Packaged A/C Unit Condensing Unit Qty Location Roof Roof Roof Area Served Corridor & Toilets Room 41 Main Office Manufacturer Lennox Lennox Lennox Model # CHA Y CHA P HS Y Serial # 5696K H L Cooling Type DX, R-22 DX, R-22 DX, R-22 Cooling Capacity (Tons) Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) 9.5 EER 9.4 SEER / 8.5 EER 8.75 SEER / 8.75 EER Heating Type N/A N/A N/A Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A Efficiency N/A N/A N/A Fuel N/A N/A N/A Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life Comments 1300 CFM, 3/4 hp, 208/ / RTU-1 interlocked with EF-1

54 Appendix D Page 2 of 8 Rooftop / AC Units Tag HV-1 HV-2 (AMU-1) - Unit Type MUA H & V MUA H & V - Qty Location Roof Roof - Area Served Corridors & Toilets Kitchen - Manufacturer Reznor Trane - Model # RPB125-S25 Size 10-A - Serial # EATA66H5N Cooling Type N/A N/A - Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A N/A - Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) N/A N/A - Heating Type Gas-Fired H & V HW Coil W-2/PF107 - Heating Input (MBH) 125 MBH MBH, 19.5 GPM@40 F T - Efficiency 77% - - Fuel Natural Gas Hot Water - Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (2) (8) - Comments F Ent Water Temp., 208/ , 5200 cfm, 100% oa -

55 Appendix D Page 3 of 8 Rooftop / AC Units Tag AH-3 (HV-1) AH-4 (HV-2) - Unit Type Air Handler Air Handler - Qty Location MP B-34 MP B-35 - Area Served All Purpose Room All Purpose Room - Manufacturer Trane Trane - Model # Size 8-B Size 12-B - Serial # N/A N/A - Cooling Type N/A N/A - Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A N/A - Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) N/A N/A - Heating Type Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil - Heating Input (MBH) MBH, 190 F EWT, 6.5 GPM@40 F T MBH, 190 F EWT, 11.5 GPM@40 F T Efficiency N/A N/A - Fuel N/A N/A - Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (8) (8) - - Comments 3600 CFM SA, 600 CFM OA, 1 1/2hp, 208v/3ph 6600 CFM SA, 1125 CFM OA, 3hp, 208v/3ph -

56 Appendix D Page 4 of 8 Rooftop / AC Units Tag Unit Type AH-5 (AH-1) CU-1 AH-2 Split Air Handling Unit Air-Cooled Condenser Split Air Handling Unit Qty Location Above Ceiling Roof Above Ceiling Area Served Library Library Nurse's Office Manufacturer Trane Trane Trane Model # Size 10-B RAUC-C106 Size 6-B Serial # N/A N/A N/A Cooling Type Cooling Capacity (Tons) Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) DX, R-22, 6 Row, 98 Fin/Ft, 50 F evap Temp. 10 Ton (139.1 MBH) DX, R Tons (139.9 MBH) DX, R-22, 4 Row, 104 Fin/Ft, 50 F evap Temp. 5 Ton (55.2 MBH) EER = 10.1 EER = 10 EER = 9.4 Heating Type HW Coil WC-1/PF152 N/A HW Coil WC-5F119 Heating Input (MBH) MBH, 190 F EWT, 8.5 GPM@40 F T N/A 83.1 MBH, 190 F EWT, 5.5 GPM@40 F T Efficiency N/A N/A N/A Fuel 208v/3ph/60hz 208v/3ph/60hz 208v/3ph/60hz Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (2) (2) (2) Comments 5100 CFM SA, 750 CFM OA, 3hp 95 F amb., 48 F Suct. Temp, 27" dia Cond Fan, 1 hp (38x51x39h) 2200 CFM SA, 310 CFM OA, 1hp

57 Appendix D Page 5 of 8 MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group Patrick McGaheran School Boilers Tag Boiler-1 & 2 B-3 & B-4 Unit Type Cast Iron Sectional Boilers Modular Boilers Qty 2 2 Location Boiler Room Boiler Room Area Served Entire Facility 1993 Wing Manufacturer Weil-McLain Slant/Fin Caravan Model # 1088 Series GG 375 EC Serial # CP , CP SN Input Capacity (MBH) 3,103 MBH 375 MBH Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 2,452 MBH 300 MBH Approx. Efficiency % 79% 80.00% Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life 11 7 Comments Power Flame LNICR2-G-20B, 1hp blower -

58 MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group Appendix D Page 6 of 8 Patrick McGaheran School Domestic Water Heaters Tag HWH-1 HWH-2 HWH Unit Type Hot Water Heater Hot Water Heater Electric Booster Qty Location Boiler Room Boiler Room Kitchen Area Served Restrooms/Kitchen Restroom/Kitchen Dishwash Manufacturer AO Smith Raypack Hatco Cannot Read Model # BTR C-36 Equipment Tag Serial # 1012M " " Size (Gallons) 118 " " 6 Input Capacity (MBH/KW) 199 " " 36 kw Recovery (Gal/Hr) " " F Rise Efficiency % 80% " " 98.00% Fuel Natural Gas " " 208v Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life 11 (11) (11) Comments - Unit not on line - used as backup Used with Hobart CRS- 66, S/N LH

59 Appendix D Page 7 of 8 Pumps MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group Patrick McGaheran School Tag P-1A & P-2A P-1B & P-2B P-1C & P-2C Unit Type In-line In-line In-line Qty Location Boiler Room Boiler Room Boiler Room Area Served 1993 Addition Building Heat Building Heat Manufacturer Armstrong TACO TACO Model # Serial # 2E 4380 BF , CINI 7.6, 1919CIEI 7.? 1919CINI Horse Power Flow FT HD 55 FT HD Motor Info Baldor 36M72Y45 AO Smith Cat# H703, Baldor 35 FT HD, (49% eff.) Baldor VM3116 Electrical Power 208/3/60 208/3/60 208/3/60 RPM Motor Efficiency % 83.3% 78.5% 77.0% Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (13) (5) (9) Comments F, 6 1/2" imp. - -

60 Appendix D Page 8 of 8 Pumps Tag P-3 & P Unit Type In-line - - Qty Location Boiler Room - - Area Served Weil McLain Boilers - - Manufacturer TACO - - Model # K4009AE2JCB689D - - Serial # Horse Power Flow FT HD - - Motor Info Baldor VJMM3611T - - Electrical Power 200/3/ RPM Motor Efficiency % 84.0% - - Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (5) - - Comments 6.2" Imp. - -

61 Appendix APPENDIX E

62 Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E 1 of 11 CEG Job #: 9C11002 Project: Clinton Township Board of Education Patrick McGaheran Elementary School KWH COST: $ Allerton Road Bldg. Sq. Ft. Lebanon, NJ ,623 ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade - General EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kw Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Custodial Office Girls' Restroom Boys' Restroom Room Classroom 36B Classroom 36A Classroom 3B Classroom 35A Classroom Classroom Instrument Storage Classroom Classroom x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic ,206.4 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $40.30 $14.00 $ $ $40.30 $14.00 $ $ $ $21.00 $ $ $40.30 $14.00 $ $ ,683.2 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ $40.30 $14.00 $ $ ,683.2 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ $40.30 $14.00 $ $ ,683.2 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ ,236.0 $ ,683.2 $ ,173.0 $ $ ,729.4 $ ,338.4 $ $40.30 $14.00 $ $ $ $21.00 $ $ $ $21.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $78.99 $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $

63 Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E 2 of 11 ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade - General EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kw Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Classroom 44 Closet Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Custodial Closet Kitchen x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic $ ,338.4 $ ,616.6 $ ,947.4 $ ,236.0 $ $18.23 $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $21.00 $ $ ,130.4 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,130.4 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,619.2 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ Hood Hood Light w/globe & Cage, 100w A Lamp $ w CFL Lamp $20.96 $20.00 $ $ Office x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic $ $39.49 $28.00 $ $ All Purpose Room w MV LoBay w/prismatic ,476.0 $3, x4 54w T5HO 3 Lamp, Prismatic $1, $ $6, $1, Classroom B Storage Closet Classroom B Classroom B Classroom B Copy Room B Classroom A x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic ,683.2 $ $ $21.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,338.4 $ ,338.4 $ ,112.8 $ ,112.8 $ ,338.4 $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $

64 Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E 3 of 11 ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade - General EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kw Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Classroom A Library x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic ,338.4 $ ,180.6 $1, $ $ $28.00 $ $ $1, $28.00 $ $ $ $14.00 $ $ Library Closet Classroom A Classroom A Custodial Closet Elec. Room Boys' Restroom Girls' Restroom Faculty Restroom Storage Classroom A Classroom A Com. Equipment Conference Room A12 Conference Room A Classroom A Classroom A x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic ,947.4 $ ,338.4 $ ,782.0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $26.78 $21.00 $ $ $13.39 $21.00 $ $ $80.60 $14.00 $ $ $80.60 $14.00 $ $ $9.30 $14.00 $ $ $26.78 $21.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,112.8 $ ,112.8 $ ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $

65 Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E 4 of 11 ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade - General EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kw Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Classroom A Classroom A Classroom A Classroom A Boys' Restroom Girls' Restroom Elec. Room Classroom A Classroom A Faculty Room Book Room Classsroom B Classroom B Office B Main Office Conference Room Principal's Office Com. Closet Women's Restroom x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $80.60 $14.00 $ $ $80.60 $14.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,173.0 $ ,173.0 $ ,338.4 $ $ ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ ,503.8 $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ ,683.2 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ $20.15 $14.00 $ $

66 Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E 5 of 11 ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade - General EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kw Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Storage CLoset Work Room Guidance Nurse Exam Room Waiting Room Elec. Room Stage Gym Storage Gym Storage Art Room Boys' Restroom Girls' Restroom Elec. Room Boiler Room Gen. Room Switch Gear Pump House x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series Mnt., Prismatic 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic $ $ $ ,669.2 $ $ $ $9.30 $14.00 $ $ $58.03 $21.00 $ $ $78.99 $28.00 $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $29.02 $21.00 $ $ $29.02 $21.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,398.6 $ $ $ $ $28.00 $ $ $80.60 $14.00 $ $ $80.60 $14.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,062.4 $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ ,728.0 $ $ $14.00 $ $ Exterior w HPS Wallpack ,617.6 $1, No Change $0.00 $0.00 $ $ Totals ,999 $28, ,039 $19,846 $18, ,691 $3,

67 APPENDIX E 6 of 11 CEG Job #: 9C11002 Project: Clinton Township Board of Education Patrick McGaheran Elementary School KWH COST: $0.155 Address: 63 Allerton Road Lebanon, NJ Building SF: 67,623 ECM #6: Lighting Controls EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kw (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Custodial Office x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Girls' Restroom Boys' Restroom x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w $ No Change % $49.97 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % $49.97 $0.00 $ $ Room Classroom 36B Classroom 36A Classroom 3B x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $49.97 $0.00 $ $ $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $49.97 $0.00 $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $49.97 $0.00 $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $49.97 $0.00 $ $ Classroom 35A x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Instrument Storage x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ No Change % $86.24 $0.00 $ $

68 APPENDIX E 7 of 11 ECM #6: Lighting Controls EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kw (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Classroom Classroom Classroom 44 Closet Classroom Classroom Classroom x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $19.90 $0.00 $ $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Custodial Closet x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % 69.6 $10.79 $0.00 $ $ Kitchen x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Hood Hood Light w/globe & Cage, 100w A Lamp $ No Change % 520 $80.60 $0.00 $ $ Office All Purpose Room x4, 4 Lamp, 32w w MV LoBay w/prismatic $ No Change % $43.12 $0.00 $ $ $3, Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $2, $ $1, $ Classroom B x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Storage Closet x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % $21.58 $0.00 $ $

69 APPENDIX E 8 of 11 ECM #6: Lighting Controls EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kw (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Classroom B Classroom B Classroom B Copy Room B Classroom A Classroom A Library x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic $ $ $ $ $ $ $1, $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $1, $ $1, $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Library Closet x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom A x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom A x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Custodial Closet x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ No Change % $31.99 $0.00 $ $ Elec. Room Boys' Restroom Girls' Restroom Faculty Restroom x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w $ No Change % $16.00 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % $99.94 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % $99.94 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % 74.4 $11.53 $0.00 $ $

70 APPENDIX E 9 of 11 ECM #6: Lighting Controls EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kw (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Storage x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ No Change % $31.99 $0.00 $ $ Classroom A x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Classroom A x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Com. Equipment x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $69.04 $ $ $ Conference Room A12 Conference Room A Classroom A Classroom A Classroom A Classroom A Classroom A Classroom A Boys' Restroom Girls' Restroom x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $99.94 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % $99.94 $0.00 $ $ Elec. Room x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No $ No Change % 69.6 $10.79 $0.00 $ $ Classroom A x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $

71 APPENDIX E 10 of 11 ECM #6: Lighting Controls EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kw (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Classroom A Faculty Room Book Room Classsroom B Classroom B Office B x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ $ $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt. Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ % $ $ $ $ Main Office x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Conference Room x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $ $ $ $ Principal's Office x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $ $ $ $ Com. Closet x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % 69.6 $10.79 $0.00 $ $ Women's Restroom Storage CLoset x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w $ No Change % $24.99 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % 74.4 $11.53 $0.00 $ $ Work Room x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $55.45 $ $ $ Guidance x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $68.99 $ $ $ Nurse x4, 4 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Exam Room x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ No Change % $34.66 $0.00 $ $

72 APPENDIX E 11 of 11 ECM #6: Lighting Controls EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kwh/yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kwh/yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kw kwh/yr Yearly Yearly Simple Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kw Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kw (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback Waiting Room x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic $ No Change % $34.66 $0.00 $ $ Elec. Room x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % $43.15 $0.00 $ $ Stage x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % 754 $ $0.00 $ $ Gym Storage x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $34.52 $ $ $ Gym Storage x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt % $51.78 $ $ $ Art Room Boys' Restroom Girls' Restroom x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w $ Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ $ No Change % $99.94 $0.00 $ $ $ No Change % $99.94 $0.00 $ $ Elec. Room x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No $ No Change % 69.6 $10.79 $0.00 $ $ Boiler Room x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % $ $0.00 $ $ Gen. Room x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % $21.58 $0.00 $ $ Switch Gear x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., No $ No Change % $21.58 $0.00 $ $ Pump House x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Surface Mnt., Prismatic $ Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt % $ $ $ $ Exterior w HPS Wallpack $1, No Change % $1, $0.00 $ $ Totals ,998.8 $28, ,792.6 $23, $24, ,206 $5,

73 Appendix APPENDIX F

74 Appendix F Page 1 of 3 Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Clinton Township BOE - Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Location: Clinton, NJ Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year Simple Payback Analysis Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year Total Construction Cost $1,511,100 Annual kwh Production 190,233 Annual Energy Cost Reduction $29,486 Annual SREC Revenue $66,582 First Cost Premium $1,511,100 Simple Payback: Years Life Cycle Cost Analysis Analysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95% Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0% Average Energy Cost ($/kwh) $0.155 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0% Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kwh) $0.350 Period Additional Energy kwh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash Cumulative Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow 0 $75, $0 0 0 (75,555) 0 1 $0 190,233 $29,486 $0 $66,582 $99,792 $21,961 ($25,686) ($101,241) 2 $0 189,282 $30,371 $0 $66,249 $98,205 $23,549 ($25,134) ($126,375) 3 $0 188,335 $31,282 $0 $65,917 $96,503 $25,251 ($24,554) ($150,930) 4 $0 187,394 $32,220 $0 $65,588 $94,677 $27,076 ($23,946) ($174,875) 5 $0 186,457 $33,187 $1,921 $65,260 $92,720 $29,034 ($25,227) ($200,102) 6 $0 185,524 $34,182 $1,911 $64,934 $90,621 $31,133 ($24,548) ($224,651) 7 $0 184,597 $35,208 $1,901 $64,609 $88,370 $33,383 ($23,838) ($248,489) 8 $0 183,674 $36,264 $1,892 $64,286 $85,957 $35,797 ($23,095) ($271,584) 9 $0 182,756 $37,352 $1,882 $63,964 $83,369 $38,384 ($22,319) ($293,904) 10 $0 181,842 $38,473 $1,873 $63,645 $80,595 $41,159 ($21,509) ($315,413) 11 $0 180,933 $39,627 $1,864 $63,326 $77,619 $44,134 ($20,664) ($336,077) 12 $0 180,028 $40,816 $1,854 $63,010 $74,429 $47,325 ($19,782) ($355,859) 13 $0 179,128 $42,040 $1,845 $62,695 $71,007 $50,746 ($18,864) ($374,723) 14 $0 178,232 $43,301 $1,836 $62,381 $67,339 $54,415 ($17,907) ($392,630) 15 $0 177,341 $44,600 $1,827 $62,069 $63,405 $58,348 ($16,910) ($409,540) 16 $0 176,454 $45,938 $1,817 $61,759 $59,187 $62,566 ($15,874) ($425,414) 17 $0 175,572 $47,317 $1,808 $61,450 $54,665 $67,089 ($14,795) ($440,209) 18 $0 174,694 $48,736 $1,799 $61,143 $49,815 $71,939 ($13,674) ($453,883) 19 $0 173,821 $50,198 $1,790 $60,837 $44,614 $77,139 ($12,509) ($466,392) 20 $0 172,952 $51,704 $1,781 $60,533 $39,038 $82,716 ($11,298) ($477,690) 21 $0 172,087 $53,255 $1,772 $60,230 $35,566 $76,041 $106 ($477,584) 22 $0 171,226 $54,853 $1,764 $59,929 $28,740 $62,575 $21,703 ($455,881) 23 $0 170,370 $56,498 $1,755 $59,630 $0 $0 $114,373 ($341,508) 24 $0 169,518 $58,193 $1,746 $59,331 $0 $0 $115,779 ($225,729) 25 $0 168,671 $59,939 $1,737 $59,035 $0 $0 $117,237 ($108,492) Totals: 4,481,119 $1,075,042 $38,377 $1,568,392 $1,576,233 $1,061,761 ($32,937) ($7,849,178) Net Present Value (NPV) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) ($202,651) -1.6%

75 Appendix F Page 2 of 3 Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Clinton Township BOE - Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Location: Clinton, NJ Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase Simple Payback Analysis Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase Total Construction Cost $1,511,100 Annual kwh Production 190,233 Annual Energy Cost Reduction $29,486 Annual SREC Revenue $66,582 First Cost Premium $1,511,100 Simple Payback: Years Life Cycle Cost Analysis Analysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0% Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0% Average Energy Cost ($/kwh) $0.155 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0% Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kwh) $0.350 Period Additional Energy kwh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash Cumulative Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow 0 $1,511, $0 (1,511,100) 0 1 $0 190,233 $29,486 $0 $66,582 $96,068 ($1,415,032) 2 $0 189,282 $30,371 $0 $66,249 $96,619 ($1,318,413) 3 $0 188,335 $31,282 $0 $65,917 $97,199 ($1,221,214) 4 $0 187,394 $32,220 $0 $65,588 $97,808 ($1,123,406) 5 $0 186,457 $33,187 $1,921 $65,260 $96,526 ($1,026,879) 6 $0 185,524 $34,182 $1,911 $64,934 $97,205 ($929,674) 7 $0 184,597 $35,208 $1,901 $64,609 $97,916 ($831,759) 8 $0 183,674 $36,264 $1,892 $64,286 $98,658 ($733,101) 9 $0 182,756 $37,352 $1,882 $63,964 $99,434 ($633,666) 10 $0 181,842 $38,473 $1,873 $63,645 $100,244 ($533,422) 11 $0 180,933 $39,627 $1,864 $63,326 $101,090 ($432,332) 12 $0 180,028 $40,816 $1,854 $63,010 $101,971 ($330,361) 13 $0 179,128 $42,040 $1,845 $62,695 $102,890 ($227,471) 14 $0 178,232 $43,301 $1,836 $62,381 $103,847 ($123,625) 15 $0 177,341 $44,600 $1,827 $62,069 $104,843 ($18,781) 16 $0 176,454 $45,938 $1,817 $61,759 $105,880 $87, $0 175,572 $47,317 $1,808 $61,450 $106,958 $194, $0 174,694 $48,736 $1,799 $61,143 $108,080 $302, $0 173,821 $50,198 $1,790 $60,837 $109,245 $411, $0 172,952 $51,704 $1,781 $60,533 $110,456 $521, $1 172,087 $53,255 $1,772 $60,230 $111,713 $633, $2 171,226 $54,853 $1,764 $59,929 $113,018 $746, $3 170,370 $56,498 $1,755 $59,630 $114,373 $860, $4 169,518 $58,193 $1,746 $59,331 $115,779 $976, $5 168,671 $59,939 $1,737 $59,035 $117,237 $1,093,957 Totals: 4,481,119 $1,075,042 $38,377 $1,568,392 $2,605,057 ($5,070,888) Net Present Value (NPV) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) $1,093, %

76 Appendix F Page 3 of 3 Building Patrick McGaheran ES Parking Lot Area (sq ft) 11,925 Panel Qty Sunpower SPR230 Panel Sq Ft Panel Total Sq Ft Total KW DC Total Annual kwh Panel Weight (33 lbs) W/SQFT , ,233 24, = Proposed PV Layout 1. Estimated kwh based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

77 Appendix F2 Page 1 of 3 Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Clinton Township BOE - Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Location: Clinton, NJ Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year Simple Payback Analysis Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year Total Construction Cost $1,511,100 Annual kwh Production 190,233 Annual Energy Cost Reduction $29,486 Annual SREC Revenue $66,582 First Cost Premium $1,511,100 Simple Payback: Years Life Cycle Cost Analysis Analysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95% Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0% Average Energy Cost ($/kwh) $0.155 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0% Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kwh) $0.350 Period Additional Energy kwh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash Cumulative Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow 0 $75, $0 0 0 (75,555) 0 1 $0 190,233 $29,486 $0 $66,582 $99,792 $21,961 ($25,686) ($101,241) 2 $0 189,282 $30,371 $0 $66,249 $98,205 $23,549 ($25,134) ($126,375) 3 $0 188,335 $31,282 $0 $65,917 $96,503 $25,251 ($24,554) ($150,930) 4 $0 187,394 $32,220 $0 $65,588 $94,677 $27,076 ($23,946) ($174,875) 5 $0 186,457 $33,187 $1,921 $65,260 $92,720 $29,034 ($25,227) ($200,102) 6 $0 185,524 $34,182 $1,911 $64,934 $90,621 $31,133 ($24,548) ($224,651) 7 $0 184,597 $35,208 $1,901 $64,609 $88,370 $33,383 ($23,838) ($248,489) 8 $0 183,674 $36,264 $1,892 $64,286 $85,957 $35,797 ($23,095) ($271,584) 9 $0 182,756 $37,352 $1,882 $63,964 $83,369 $38,384 ($22,319) ($293,904) 10 $0 181,842 $38,473 $1,873 $63,645 $80,595 $41,159 ($21,509) ($315,413) 11 $0 180,933 $39,627 $1,864 $63,326 $77,619 $44,134 ($20,664) ($336,077) 12 $0 180,028 $40,816 $1,854 $63,010 $74,429 $47,325 ($19,782) ($355,859) 13 $0 179,128 $42,040 $1,845 $62,695 $71,007 $50,746 ($18,864) ($374,723) 14 $0 178,232 $43,301 $1,836 $62,381 $67,339 $54,415 ($17,907) ($392,630) 15 $0 177,341 $44,600 $1,827 $62,069 $63,405 $58,348 ($16,910) ($409,540) 16 $0 176,454 $45,938 $1,817 $61,759 $59,187 $62,566 ($15,874) ($425,414) 17 $0 175,572 $47,317 $1,808 $61,450 $54,665 $67,089 ($14,795) ($440,209) 18 $0 174,694 $48,736 $1,799 $61,143 $49,815 $71,939 ($13,674) ($453,883) 19 $0 173,821 $50,198 $1,790 $60,837 $44,614 $77,139 ($12,509) ($466,392) 20 $0 172,952 $51,704 $1,781 $60,533 $39,038 $82,716 ($11,298) ($477,690) 21 $0 172,087 $53,255 $1,772 $60,230 $35,566 $76,041 $106 ($477,584) 22 $0 171,226 $54,853 $1,764 $59,929 $28,740 $62,575 $21,703 ($455,881) 23 $0 170,370 $56,498 $1,755 $59,630 $0 $0 $114,373 ($341,508) 24 $0 169,518 $58,193 $1,746 $59,331 $0 $0 $115,779 ($225,729) 25 $0 168,671 $59,939 $1,737 $59,035 $0 $0 $117,237 ($108,492) Totals: 4,481,119 $1,075,042 $38,377 $1,568,392 $1,576,233 $1,061,761 ($32,937) ($7,849,178) Net Present Value (NPV) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) ($202,651) -1.6%

78 Appendix F2 Page 2 of 3 Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Clinton Township BOE - Patrick McGaheran Elementary School Location: Clinton, NJ Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase Simple Payback Analysis Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase Total Construction Cost $1,511,100 Annual kwh Production 190,233 Annual Energy Cost Reduction $29,486 Annual SREC Revenue $66,582 First Cost Premium $1,511,100 Simple Payback: Years Life Cycle Cost Analysis Analysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0% Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0% Average Energy Cost ($/kwh) $0.155 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0% Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kwh) $0.350 Period Additional Energy kwh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash Cumulative Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow 0 $1,511, $0 (1,511,100) 0 1 $0 190,233 $29,486 $0 $66,582 $96,068 ($1,415,032) 2 $0 189,282 $30,371 $0 $66,249 $96,619 ($1,318,413) 3 $0 188,335 $31,282 $0 $65,917 $97,199 ($1,221,214) 4 $0 187,394 $32,220 $0 $65,588 $97,808 ($1,123,406) 5 $0 186,457 $33,187 $1,921 $65,260 $96,526 ($1,026,879) 6 $0 185,524 $34,182 $1,911 $64,934 $97,205 ($929,674) 7 $0 184,597 $35,208 $1,901 $64,609 $97,916 ($831,759) 8 $0 183,674 $36,264 $1,892 $64,286 $98,658 ($733,101) 9 $0 182,756 $37,352 $1,882 $63,964 $99,434 ($633,666) 10 $0 181,842 $38,473 $1,873 $63,645 $100,244 ($533,422) 11 $0 180,933 $39,627 $1,864 $63,326 $101,090 ($432,332) 12 $0 180,028 $40,816 $1,854 $63,010 $101,971 ($330,361) 13 $0 179,128 $42,040 $1,845 $62,695 $102,890 ($227,471) 14 $0 178,232 $43,301 $1,836 $62,381 $103,847 ($123,625) 15 $0 177,341 $44,600 $1,827 $62,069 $104,843 ($18,781) 16 $0 176,454 $45,938 $1,817 $61,759 $105,880 $87, $0 175,572 $47,317 $1,808 $61,450 $106,958 $194, $0 174,694 $48,736 $1,799 $61,143 $108,080 $302, $0 173,821 $50,198 $1,790 $60,837 $109,245 $411, $0 172,952 $51,704 $1,781 $60,533 $110,456 $521, $1 172,087 $53,255 $1,772 $60,230 $111,713 $633, $2 171,226 $54,853 $1,764 $59,929 $113,018 $746, $3 170,370 $56,498 $1,755 $59,630 $114,373 $860, $4 169,518 $58,193 $1,746 $59,331 $115,779 $976, $5 168,671 $59,939 $1,737 $59,035 $117,237 $1,093,957 Totals: 4,481,119 $1,075,042 $38,377 $1,568,392 $2,605,057 ($5,070,888) Net Present Value (NPV) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) $1,093, %

79 Appendix F2 Page 3 of 3 Building Patrick McGaheran ES Roof Area (sq ft) 11,925 Panel Qty Sunpower SPR230 Panel Sq Ft Panel Total Sq Ft Total KW DC Total Annual kwh Panel Weight (33 lbs) W/SQFT , ,233 24, = Proposed PV Layout 1. Estimated kwh based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.