Research performed in cooperation with DOT, FHWA. Research Study Title: An Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Large Texas Urban Areas.

Transcription

1 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE t--~~----~ ~ ~-~c~ = ,-----,-...,..,....--r-.,,._,,,...,,...,...-,-=--=--=-----~ Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-9/ F 4. Title and Subtitle An Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Texas Urban Areas -- Volume II 5. Report Date November Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) Patrice B. Ford and Timothy J. Lomax 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Transportation Planning Division P.. Box 551 Austin, Texas Perfonning Organization Report No. Research Report 1193-lF 1. Work Unit No. 11. Contract or Grant No. Study Type of Report and Period Covered Final: December 1987 November Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with DOT, FHWA. Research Study Title: An Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Large Texas Urban Areas. 16. Abstract The years from 195 to 198 represented a period of extremely rapid growth in Texas. The trends documented in this report illustrate the impact of three main themes on the amount of commuter traffic that was handled by the roadway system in Texas metropolitan areas. The increase in suburban commuting, commuting by private automobiles and the increase in the number of people in the labor force were the three main themes of "Commuting in America," a report prepared by Alan Pisarski for the Eno Foundation for Transportation. This report used that document as a basis for analyzing the commuting patterns in Texas. In general, Texas urban areas also exhibited these trends. This volume includes data used in the preparation of this study for each Texas metropolitan area. The data are grouped into three appendices. Appendix A -- Basic Demographic Characteristics Appendix B -- Commuter Flows and Patterns Appendix C -- Commuter Mode and Travel Time 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Transportation Planning, Commuting Patterns, Journey-to-Work Demographics, Labor Force, Suburban Commuting, Mode Share, Metropolitan Characteristics, Commuting Travel Time No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia Security Classif. (of the report) Unclassified 2. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified 21. No. of Pages Price Fonn DOT F 17.7 ("9)

2

3 An Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Texas Urban Areas By Patrice B. Ford Engineering Research Associate Timothy J. Lomax Associate Research Engineer Research Report 1193-lF Volume II - Appendix Research Study Sponsored by Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation in Cooperation With the United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas November 1989

4

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A: Basic Demographic Characteristics vu Table A-1: Growth in Workers Versus Growth in Population... A-1 Table A-2: Population Growth Rates Within Texas Metropolitan Areas... A-4 Figure A-1: Population by Age Group 195 to A-7 Table A-3: Population Changes During the 197s (Percent)... A-34 Table A-4: Average Household Sizes in Texas Metropolitan Areas A-35 Table A-5: Share of the Population in the of Metropolitan Texas A-36 Table A-6: 198 Distribution of Workers Within Texas Metropolitan Areas A-37 Table A-7: Vehicle Availability by Households... A-38 Figure A-2: Vehicle Ownership by Household l.ocations, A-41 Table A-8: Work Force Characteristics A-55 Figure A-3: Population and Labor Force Changes (Thousands) 196 to A-59 Figure A-4: Population and Labor Force Changes (Percent) 196 to A-73 Table A-9: Place of Residence Based on Occupation, A-1 Table A-1: Percent Change in Number of Workers from 196 to A-15 Figure A-5: Population, Labor Force, Households and Vehicles for Each Metropolitan Area 197 to A-19 Table A-11: Worker Responses Census by Residence l.ocation, A-136 iii

6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (contd) Appendix B: Commuter Flows and Patterns B-139 Table B-1: Commuting Flows by Metropolitan Area, B-141 Table B-2: Percent Change in Commuting Flows by Metropolitan Area B-142 Table B-3: Basic Commuter Flow, B-143 Table B-4: Internal Flow Patterns Within Central Cities B-149 Table B-5: Commuting Trips with a Central Destination, B-152 Table B-6: Commuting Trips with a Suburban Destination, B-153 Table B-7: Commuters Leaving Their Home Metropolitan Area, B-154 Figure B-1: Commuting Flow Volume For Each Metropolitan Area 196, 197 and B-155 Figure B-2: Trends in Commuter Flow For Each Metropolitan Area 196, 197 and 198 B-169 Figure B-3: Commuter Growth, For Metropolitan Areas in B-179 Figure B-4: Location of Commuter Growth, 196 to 198 For Metropolitan Areas in B-189 Appendix C: Commuter Mode and Travel Time... C-25 Table C-1: Metropolitan Modal Shares, C-27 Table C-2: Trends in Modal Shares (Percent) C-28 Table C-3: Shift in Modal Choices C-211 Table C-4: Distribution of Commuters by Number in Travel Group, Percent C-215 Table C-5: Public Transit to Work (Thousands) C-216 Table C-6: Public Transit Shares of Commuting by Market, 198 (Percent) C-217 iv

7 TABLE OF CONTENTS (contd) Figure C-1: Trend in Mode Choice C-219 Figure C-2: Trends in Percent of Work Force Who Bicycle or Walle to Work or Work at Home... C-235 Table C-7: Average Travel Time (Min) Total Metropolitan Area C-249 Table C-8: Private Vehicle Travel Times to Work, 198 (Percent) C-25 v

8

9 APPENDIX A BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS Population Vehicles Labor Force Households

10

11 Table A-1. Growth in Yorkers Versus Growth in Population Total E~loyment Annual En.,loyment Annual Percent Annual Percent (Thousands) Increase (Thousands) En.,loyment Population Metro12Qlitan Area Increase Increase Abilene Amarillo Austin Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Brownsville-Harlingen San Benito Bryan-College Station Corpus Christi Dallas-Ft.Worth El Paso Galveston-Texas City A-1

12 Table A-1. Growth in Yorkers Versus Growth in Population (cont'd) Total Employment Annual Employment Annual Percent Annual Percent (Thousands) Increase (Thousands) Employment Population Metro~olitan Area Increase Increase Houston Killeen Temple Laredo Longview-Marshall Lubbock McAl Len-Pharr- Edinburg Midland Odessa San Angelo San Antonio A-2

13 Table A-1. Growth in Workers Versus Growth in Population (cont'd) Total Employment Annual Employment Annual Percent Annual Percent (Thousands) Increase (Thousands) Employment Population Metro~olitan Area Increase Increase Sherman-Denison Texarkana Tyler Victoria Waco Wichita Falls A-3

14 Table A-2. Metropolitan Area Population Growth Rates ~ithin Texas Metropolitan Areas Percent Growth Abilene Amarillo Austin Beaumont-Port Arthur Orange Central Cities Brownsville-Harlingen San Benito Central Cities Bryan-College Station Central Cities Corpus Cristi Dal las-ft. Worth Central Cities El Paso Galveston-Texas City Central Cities Houston Killeen-Temple Central Cities Laredo Longview-Marshall Central Cities Lubbock so A-4

15 Table A-2. Population Growth Rates Yithin Texas Metropolitan Areas (cont'd.) Metropolitan Area Percent Growth McAllen-Pharr-Edinburg Central Cities Midland suburbs Odessa San Angelo San Antonio Sherman-Denison Central Cities Texarkana Tyler Victoria central City Waco Wichita Falls A-5

16

17 FIGUREA-1 POPULATION BY AGE GROUP 195 TO 198 A-7

18 ABILENE Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Under thousand Over thousand thousand ;- = 14 Q Q -z ~.l 1 ::i r:.. r: Over Under YEAR 198 A-8

19 AMARILLO Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Over thousand Under thousand % -Ill c Q Q -:z 14 Over ~ ~ ~ c:i.. c:i % Under 15 24% YEAR A-9

20 AUSTIN Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand 6 Over thousand 5 8%.. -Ill = z - ~.I ::J ~ ~ % 1 Under 15 22% YEAR 198 A-1

21 BEAUMONT - PORT ARTHUR - ORANGE Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand A i~~~~~~~~ Over thousand Under thousand l L ~ -. Under I YEAR I A-11

22 BROWNSVILLE - HARLINGEN - SAN BENITO Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand ~~11111!~1-57% Over thousand Under thousand 2 9% Ill Q Q... :z -!( ~ ;:i ~ ~ % % Under YEAR A-12

23 BRYAN - COLLEGE STATION Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand - Over 65 l~~~l~li!!~-4.4 thousand 783 Under thousand "' C: e e - z -!(...l ::J i:i.. i:i Under YEAR A-13

24 CORPUS CHRISTI Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Under thousand.5.4 ";'" c: e - - e - z.3 - t: ~ ;:;:) 1:1.. 1: % Under 15 27% YEAR A-14

25 DALLAS - FT WORTH Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Over thousand Under thousand 5 - = "' e - z ~..:I ~ 1:1.. 1: % 2 68% Under 15 24% YEAR A-15

26 EL PASO Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Over thousand Under l thousand ;- = ~ ! z.3 -!t 643 ~ ::i ~ ~ Under YEAR A-16

27 GALVESTON - TEXAS CITY Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand 67% Under thousand Under 15 24% YEAR A-17

28 HOUSTON Shares of Population Change by Age Group: million Over thousand 69% Under thousand 5 "';' = e -z -!;:...l ::i ~ ~ 4 3 6% L == % Under YEAR A-18

29 KILLEEN - TEMPLE Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand A:t:tttmm:t:U:Jttµ+j+t=I~ 7% Over thousand Under thousand 2 7% (II = Q -Q z t: ~ ~ ~ ~ Under 15 24% YEAR A-19

30 LAREDO Shares of Population Change by Age Group: ' ' ' Under thousand Ill 14 = - Q -Q z ~ 1...I - ;J Q,. Q, ~ Over 64""'\ ~ -- ) ~ -- ' I if,_-~ I 196 Under I YEAR A-2

31 LONGVIEW - MARSHALL Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand Under thousand c; 14 Q Q - 12 Over % Under YEAR A-21

32 LUBBOCK Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Over thousand Under thousand 2 8% Ill Q 14-2: 12 68% - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Under 15 24% YEAR A-22

33 MCALLEN - PHARR - EDINBURG thousand Shares of Population Change by Age Group: % 15% Over thousand Under thousand -;- e =... :z - ~..I :::i ~ ~ Over 64 9% 58% Under 15 33% YEAR 198 A-23

34 MIDLAND Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand 693 Under thousand {ill c Q Q z - ~... ~ Q,, Q,, Over Under YEAR A-24

35 ODESSA Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand 663 Under thousand A-25

36 SAN ANGELO Shares -of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand Under ; ~ thousand Ill -lit... = z - ~ ~ ::;:l Q,. Q, Over 64 ~ Under 15 I YEAR I -- _.._ % A-26

37 SAN ANTONIO Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand Under thousand Under YEAR A-27

38 SHERMAN - DENISON Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand lit Under thousand Ill = Q -Q z ~...; ::J ~ ~ Over ,_ ,_,... Under I I -~ YEAR A-28

39 TEXARKANA Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand ~~~1111~1~. - 58% Over 64 l 2.2 thousand Under thousand fl) = Q Q -z - ~...l ~ c. c % 62% Under 15 25% YEAR A-29

40 TYLER Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Over thousand ' 57% Under thousand = z 12 - ~ 1..J ::i Q,. Q,. 8 12% 64% Under 15 24% YEAR A-3

41 VICTORIA Shares of Population Change by Age Group: Over thousand ' - Under ~ 9.4 thousand 25% ~ Q = z ~ :;J Q. Q Over 64~ ~ _,,_ 9% i::; I Under 15 I --, % 26% YEAR A-31

42 WACO Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand Under thousand ;- Q Q Q - :z - ~...l ::;J c. c Over Under YEAR A-32

43 WICHITA FALLS Shares of Population Change by Age Group: thousand Over thousand Under thousand ~~~~~~~~ ,l-~123 ~ Over ~ i,-- 1 ~ ~------'-- JJ_~ 2 - Under ~~~~~~~~~--.,,..-~~~~~~~~~--.,~~~~~~~~~~-i11-~ YEAR A-33

44 Table A-3. Population Changes During the 197s (Percent) Metro~olitan Area Total Under Over 64 Abilene Amarillo Austin Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Brownsville-Harlingen San Benito Bryan-College Station Corpus Christi Dallas-Ft. Worth El Paso Galveston-Texas City Houston Killeen-Temple Laredo Longview-Marshall Lubbock McAl Len-Pharr Edinburg Midland Odessa San Angelo San Antonio Sherman-Denison Texarkana Tyler Victoria Waco Wichita Falls A-34

45 Metropolitan Area Table A-4. Average Household Sizes in Texas Metropolitan Areas Average Household Size (Persons/Household) Texas Metropolitan Abilene Amarillo Austin Beaumont-Port Arthur-orange Brownsville Harlingen San Benito Bryan-College Station 2.6 Corpus Christi Dallas Ft. Worth El Paso Galveston-Texas City Houston Killeen-Temple 2.85 Laredo Longview-Marshall 2.75 Lubbock McAllen-Pharr-Edinburg Midland 2.77 Odessa 2.83 San Angelo San Antonio Sherman-Denison 2.58 Texarkana Tyler 2.73 Victoria 2.96 Waco Wichita Falls A-35

46 Table A-5. Share of the Population in the Slilurbs of Metropolitan Texas Share of Population in (%) Metropolitan Area Abilene Amarillo Austin Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito Bryan-College Station Corpus Christi Dallas-Ft. Worth El Paso Galveston-Texas City Houston Killeen-Temple Laredo Longview-Marshall Lubbock McAllen-Pharr-Edinburg Midland Odessa San Angelo San Antonio Sherman-Denison Texarkana Tyler Victoria Waco Wichita Falls 23 A-36

47 Table A Distribution of Workers Within Texas Metropolitan Areas Percent of Metro Difference from Metro122litan Area Workers in Texas Texas Metropolitan 42 Abi Lene Amarillo Austin 33-9 Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito Bryan-College Station Corpus Christi El Paso 12-3 Dallas-Ft. Worth Galveston-Texas City Houston Killeen-Temple Laredo 8-34 Longview-Marshall 4-2 Lubbock McAllen Pharr-Edinburg Midland Odessa 2-22 San Angelo San Antonio 3-12 Sherman-Denison 38-4 Texarkana Tyler Victoria Waco Wichita Falls A-37

48 Table A-7. Vehicle Availability by Households Metropolitan Area % change % of 198 ~12 ~ Households Abilene Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Amarillo Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Austin Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Bryan-College Station Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Corpus Christi Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Dallas-Fort Worth Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles El Paso Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Galveston-Texas City Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Houston (j Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Killeen-Temple Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles A-38

49 Table A-7. Vehicle Availability by Households (cont'd.) Metropolitan Area % change % of 198 ~12 ~ Households McAllen Pharr Edinburg Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Laredo Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Longview-Marshall Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Lubbock Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Midland Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Odessa Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles San Angelo Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles San Antonio Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Sherman-Denison Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Texarkana Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Tyler Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Victoria Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles A-39

50 Table A-7. Vehicle Availability by Households (cont'd.) Metropolitan Area % change % of 198 ~12 ~ Households Waco Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles Wichita Fal Ls Vehicle Vehicle Vehicles A-4

51 FIGURE A-2 VEHICLE OWNERSHIP BY HOUSEHOLD LOCATIONS, 198 A-41

52 ABILENE Thousands of Households with Veh/House CENTRAL CITY Veh/House 2+ Veh/House _. 1 Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House 2+ Veh/House Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA AMARILLO Thousands of Households with Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 2+ Veh/House 1 Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA A-42

53 AUSTIN Thousands of Households with I Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House I 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I 2+ Veh/House I 1 Veh/House ] Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA BEAUMONT-PORT ARTHUR-ORANGE Thousands of Households with 12+ Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I 2+ Veh/House ] 1 Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA A-4-3

54 BROWNSVILLE-HARLINGEN-SAN BENITO Thousands of Households with lo Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House 11 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 12+ Veh/House I 1 Veh/House I Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION Thousands of Households with I Veh/House 11 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 12+ Veh/House ::J 1 Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA A-44

55 CORPUS CHRISTI Thousands of Households with I Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House 1. 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I 2+ Veh/House I t Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House ] 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House 1 Veh/House, TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA DALLAS-FT. WORTH Thousands of Households with I 2+ Veh/House 11 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY Veh/House 12+ Veh/House Veh/House 11 Veh/House SUBURBS -- I l Veh/House J 2+ Veh/House 1 Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA A-45

56 EL PASO Thousands of Households with I 2+ Veh/House 11 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I Veh/House D 1 Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS 12+ Veh/House I 2+ Veh/Hous e I Veh/House. 3 I 1 Veh/House. ~ TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA 6 9 GALVESTON-TEXAS CITY Thousands of Households with J 2+ Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY Veh/House 11 Veh/House 12+ Veh/House SUBURBS 12+ Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I A-46

57 HOUSTON Thousands of Households with I Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House I 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY D Veh/House I 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House SUBURBS I 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House I Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA t I -. I 2 '1 6 8 KILLEEN-TEMPLE Thousands of Households with D Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House I 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CIT y I t Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House SUBURB s Veh/House I Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House I t Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN ARE A ' I I I A-47

58 LAREDO Thousands of Households with lo Veh/House 12+ Veh/House J t Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I 2+ Veh/House t Veh/House SUBURBS ) Veh/House I Veh/House I 5 I t Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I 1 I t5 LONGVIEW-MARSHALL Thousands of Households with D Veh/House I t Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 12+ Veh/House I t Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS I t Veh/House 12+ Veh/Hous e I Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I A-48

59 LUBBOCK Thousands of Households with ' Veh/House Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 2+ Veh/House 1 Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House Veh/House Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA MCALLEN-PHARR-EDINBURG Thousands of Households with I 2+ Veh/House 11 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY --, Veh/House I Veh/House 11 Veh/House 12+ Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House 11 Veh/House I Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I I I A-49

60 MIDLAND Thousands of Households with..._~~~~~~~~ 1 Veh/House Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I-----' 2+ Veh/House 1 Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House..._~~~~~~~~- 1 Veh/House Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA ODESSA Thousands of Households with D Veh/House I t Veh/House 12+ Veh/House CENTRAL CITY J 1 Veh/House Veh/House 12+ Veh/House SUBURBS 12+ Veh/H ouse I 1 Veh/House :=J Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I ' ' ' A-5

61 SAN ANGELO Thousands of Households with I 2+ Veh/House 11 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY L_J Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House =:J t Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS I 2+ Veh/House I Veh/House 11 Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I T I I 5 to t SAN ANTONIO Thousands of Households with I 2+ Veh/House I t Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I Veh/House 12+ Veh/House I t Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS I 2+ Veh/House I Veh/House 1 t Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I I I 5 too t A-51

62 SHERMAN-DENISON Thousands of Households with I Veh/House I t Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House CENTRAL CITY Veh/House I t Veh/House 12+ Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House I t Veh/House 12+ Veh/Hous e TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA t I I I I 5 to, t TEXARKANA Thousands of Households with 12+ Veh/House 1 t Veh/House CENTRAL CITY CJ Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House 1 t Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I I A-52

63 TYLER Thousands of Households with :J Veh/House I 1 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 12+ Veh/House I t Veh/House SUBURBS J Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House l 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I I VICTORIA Thousands of Households with Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 1 Veh/House Veh/House SUBURBS Veh/House 5 TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA 1 2 A-53

64 WACO Thousands of Households with I 2+ Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY I 2+ Veh/House I 1 Veh/House SUBURBS ] Veh/House I Veh/House I 1 Veh/House 12+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA T I I I I WICHITA FALLS Thousands of Households with l 2+ Veh/House D Veh/House 11 Veh/House CENTRAL CITY 1 2+ Veh/House 11 Veh/House J Veh/House SUBURBS I Veh/House 11 Veh/House I 2+ Veh/House TOTAL METROPOLITAN AREA I I I I A-54

65 Table A-8. York Force Characteristics Total Work Force Percent of Work Force Percent of Working Age Population in Work Force Metro~olitan Area ~Thousandsl Male Female Male Female Total Abilene Amarillo Austin Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito Bryan-College Station Corpus Christi Dallas-Ft. Worth , El Paso Galveston-Texas City Houston , A-55

66 Table A-8. York Force Characteristics (cont'd.) Total \Jork Force Percent of \Jork Force Percent of \Jorking Age Population in \Jork Force Metro~olitan Area ~Thousands} Male Female Male Female Total Killeen-Telll'le Laredo Longview Marshall Lubbock McAllen-Pharr-Edinburg so Midland Odessa San Angelo San Antonio Sherman-Denison Texarkana Tyler A-56

67 Table A-8. York Force Characteristics (cont'd.) Metropolitan Area Total Work Force (Thousands) Percent of Work Force Male Female Percent of \.Jerking Age Population in \.Jork Force Male Female Total Victoria Waco Wichita Falls A-57

68

69 FIGURE A-3 POPULATION AND LABOR FORCE CHANGES (THOUSANDS) 196 TO 198

70 3 25 ~ 2 z ~ :::J 15 = -z LI.I ~ 1 ABILENE fj) 5 -:-: <.. LI.I e oj_~--r..~ ~ r--mrrm:r~~~~ ~...Ll.W.W&-~~... ~ L----r , m Total Population r:::j Population Labor Force AMARILLO m Total Population D Population Labor Force 15 1 LI.I fj) < LI.I = u -z A-6

71 "" Q z "" ~ ::c... < z 8- -U.I "" < 6- U.I = u -z 4-2- AUSTIN ' iri-a".... ~ lo '.. ' it '.. lo.. '... I I I Total Population D Population Labor Force "" Q 3- z < "" ~ 25- z -U.I < "" U.I = ::c u 1- z 5- BEAUMONT-PORT ARTHUR-ORANGE -. - ~.. ~ it it it It.. '.... ~ '... ~. I I A I [22) Total Population D Population miijiil] Labor Force

72 rj) Q z < rj) :J 4 =... 3 z -(.l,,j rj) 2 < 1 (.l,,j c= u -z -1 BROWNSVILLE-HARLINGEN-SAN BENITO E::::;] Total Population [::J Population filiiliii) Labor Force BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION [::!::::J Total Population D Population rj) Q 3 z < rj) :J =... z 25 2 filiiliii) Labor Force -(.l,,j rj) 15 < (.l,,j c= u 1 z A

73 CORPUS CHRISTI It 6- It It It "" Q z 5- <... It "" :;::> - It ::c 4- It f-t - z.. ~ 3- '.... "" <... ~ = u 2- z ~.... I I ~198 m Total Population CJ Population Labor Force DALLAS-FT WORTH 7- l:"7':' 6-,.. "" Q z 5- < "" :;::>.. - ::c f-t z - ~ 3- "" < ~ = 2- u z I I A-63,_..,, It.. I......,.... ' I E:::3 Total Population c::j Population llilili!i1 Labor Force

74 f/'j Q z: ;}j ::J =... z: -i.u f/'j < i.u CZ: u z - 5- ':"":"" ~ ' '.. '.. ' I I I &::.:] Total Population D Population filliliiil Labor Force EL PASO 3-,...,,_ GALVESTON-TEXAS CITY ',... '.. r--, ' ~ ~ -~.. ~ ~ ~ 19 le'.. ~ le.. ~ lit i- '9 "' o.....,._-.._ o.&.-.-,... JJ.J LL ~, ~-~ ~-~... _~, Total Population c::j Population l1iitilij Labor Force A-61.t

75 {/) Q z < C/J ~.. -z U.J = C/J < U.J er: u -z HOUSTON ir-w-'i' to i-.. ~.. to to to to.. to ~ ~ It i.... ~!t.... ~ "..... ~!t.. 19 ie It ie ~ ~. I ~. feo ' I I m Total Population c::j Population UIIIIIll Labor Force U.J C/J < U.J er: u -z 19 o... ~~~~~ ~....,....~-- ~ ~~- KILLEEN-TEMPLE 6-5- ':"'7 4-. ~ o~ ~~ ~ ~ I I... I --~ ~ E:::::J Total Population Population filiiiiil) Labor Force A-65

76 ,LAREDO o..i.~~~~... ~...:....:ii ~~~~~~~..-~~~~ ~... ~~~~~~~ r:::::j Total Population D Population IIlilIIIl Labor Force LONGVIEW-MARSHALL OM.-~~...L;..-...l~-'-~~~~.,-~~-...&,,,j~-'-~~~ m Total Population Population IIlIIlill Labor Force A-66

77 "" Q z < "" p ::c foz -UJ "" < UJ a:: u -z LUBBOCK..-- "....._ " ".. lo ".... lo --- lo lo I--- lo lo lo lo lo.. lo lo lo lo lo lo.. lo.. lo lo lo lo.... I I I E::!:] Total Population [:J Population lilliliii) Labor Force "" Q z < "" p ::c foz -UJ < "" UJ a:: u -z MCALLEN-PHARR-EDINBURG ' L.-.--' L~ ~...:l "'-...--""""" ~Total Population D Population IIlililIIJ Labor Force A-67

78 "' Q :z < :;J "' ::c to- :z -I.I.I < "' I.I.I = u -:z MIDLAND c::::::::j Total Population D Population Labor Force "' Q :z ~ :;J ::c to- :z -I.I.I < "' I.I.I u = -:z ODESSA ~Total Population Po pulation l!illiiiij Labor Force A-68

79 SAN ANGELO ""... Q 1 :z... < cj'j ;J 8 :r:: :z LLl.. "".. <.. LLl 4.. Q::.. u :z I.. I Total Population D Population Labor Force SAN ANTONIO 2- ~ 16- :z ~ 14- ::J g ~ 1- LLl ~ 8- LLl :z... e ,..._... ~... e I e e e I e e e e I :-:-;---- :-: :..... ~ ~ j ~ o-.j.l.= ~ ~ ~ ~ 1..,,,...JlJll.Ull.U.L. r-, _ r-,-"".lu..lu.i I:< <I Total Population D Population Labor Force A-69

80 "' Q z < ~ "' ::r.:... z -l.&j < "' l.&j g:: u -z SHERMAN-DENISON "~~~~...1..~ :...: ~---~.1-~~~~~~--~~~~a...:-: ~.1-~~~~~~ l : : I Total Population D Population filljiiii] Labor Force "' Q z < "' ~ ::r.:... z -l.&j "' < l.&j g:: u -z 3 TEXARKANA I>> J Total Population 25.. c:j Population filliliii) Labor Force A-7

81 35 TYLER ~Total Population VJ 3 Q 2: 25 < VJ ::J 2 = fo-o -2: 15 i;i..j ~ < i;i..j... = u 1 2: CJPopulation fillililij Labor Force 16 VICTORIA ~ Total Population 14 D Population VJ Q Labor Force 2: 12 < VJ... ::J 1... = fo-o 2: i;i..j.. VJ.. < i;i..j = u 4 2: A-71

82 WACO 25 I: : :I Total Population... CJ Population lilliiilij Labor Force "'... Q :z < 15 "' ~ :c... 1 :z -.. "" rj).. < 5 "" = u -:z WICHITA FALLS ~Total Population "' Q :z < ~ "' :c... 1 C]Population :z 4 "" < 2 "' "" = u :z - -2 IIlIIlilllLabor Force A-72

83 FIGURE A-4 POPULATION AND LABOR FORCE CHANGES (PERCENT) 196 TO 198

84 ABILENE D Population Age [] Labor Force II Labor Force-Male IJl Labor Force-Female 6 5 U.I rj'j < U.I u = z -fz IW u IW = i: ' A-74

85 AMARILLO D Population Age D Labol' fol'ce II Labol' fol'ce-male ffiilil1 Labol' fol'ce-female = lolj (I') < lolj u -z toz lolj u = lolj Q., ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A-75

86 16 AUSTIN D D. Ill Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female '-I.I CJ) 1 < '-I.I u = -:z 8 :z """ '-I.I u = '-I.I ~ A-76

87 1 9 BEAUMONT - PORT ARTHUR - ORANGE D []. II Ill Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female J r./) < 1.1.J u = z -Ez 1.1.J u = ~ ~ o_. _._... ~ ~ --a.wu.w j.~i;..:..:.: A-77

88 BROWNSVILLE D Population Age HARLINGEN - SAN BENITO E::: :I Labor Force II Labor force-male IIlliill Labor force-female (.I.I fl) < (.I.I u = -:z to- :z (.I.I u = (.I.I i::i A-78

89 BRYAN COLLEGE STATION D Population Age [] Labor Force Labor Force-Male 16 - ffiilllj Labor Force-Female u..i "" < u..i er:: u -z I-< z u..i u er:: u..i ~ A-79

90 1 9 8 CORPUS CHRISTI D. D II - Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female 7 l.i.l (,/'J < l.i.l = u :z -~ :z l.i.l u = l.i.l " ' ~ A-8

91 1 9 DALLAS - FORT WORTH D Population Age Q Labor Force II Labor Force-Male l1iljill Labor Force-Female 8 7 "' i.u 6 < i.u u = ~ 5... :z i.u u = i.u 4 ~ : ~ :~: A-81

92 1 9 EL PASO D Population Age Q Labor Force II Labor Force-Male IIillill Labor Force-Female 8 7 '-lj (,/) < '-lj = u z -E-- z '-lj u = '-lj Q A-82

93 1 9 GALVESTON - TEXAS CITY D Population Age Q Labor Force II Labor Force-Male liiillij Labor Force-Female 8 7 I.I.I rjj < I.I.I = u z -~ z lou u c:: lou ~ O-'-~~~~ A-83

94 16 HOUSTON D D. II lill1lil Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female i.i CJ') < i.i CZ:: u ;z -f-o ;z i.i u CZ:: i.i "' o...l.~~~~ A-84

95 KILLEEN - TEMPLE - D Population Age Q Labor force II Labor force-male Ill Labor force-female - w (l'j < w u = z - z """' w u w = ~ o...l l '---'----: so A-85

96 LAREDO D Population Age [] Labor Force II Labor Force-Male liiiiil1 Labor Force-Female LU r./j 6- < LU ex: u :z -... :z LU u ex: 5- LU 4- g A-86

97 LONG_VIEW MARSHALL D Population Age [J Labor Force II Labor Force-Male fiillill Labor Force-Female U.I "' < U.I u = z -... z U.I u U.I = so o...l l...i --J..._,, A-87

98 1 9 LUBBOCK D D. II [I] Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female 8 7 I.I.I 6 ~ < U.I = u :z -Eo- :z I.I.I u = I.I.I "' " ll 11i I!,, 11 1i II II 'I,,.. ii II!J :, i! 1: il , Ii! I I. I I A-88

99 16 MCALLEN - PHARR - EDINBURG D D. II ffil Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female ell ""' < ""' u = :z -... :z 1 8 u = ""' Q,, 6 ""' A-89

100 1 9 MIDLAND D D. II III Population Age Labor Force Labor Force-Male Labor Force-Female 8 7 LI.I fl) < LI.I u = -:z... :z LI.I u = LI.I c:i o_l.~~~_j J ~~~~~~~~~~1~9~1;.-~1;9s~o;--~~ A-9

101 ODESSA D Population Age [J Labor Force II Labor Force-Male OOillJ Labor Force-Female (/') < ""' ""' = u :z :z u ""' Q,, ""' = I A-91

102 SAN ANGELO D Population Age Q Labor Force II Labor Force-Male - Labor Force-Female "" """ < """ = u z -... z u """ = Q,. """ o..l ll9_6l--1-9_7 ~1:9:7:~-1~9:8:----~-- A-92

103 1 9 SAN ANTONIO D Population Age D Labor Force Ill Labor Force-Male lillillj Labor Force-Female 8 7 ~ en 6 < ~ a: u z 5 -t-- z ~ u a: ~ ~ ' I A-93

104 SHERMAN - DENISON D Population Age Q Labor Force II Labor Force-Male IIlIIJII Labor Force-Female (.IJ <JJ < (.IJ u = z -... :z (.IJ u = (.IJ so A-94

105 TEXARKANA D Population Age (::::i Labor Force II Labor Force-Male ffiitill Labor Force-Female ~ rn 6 < 1.1.:1 = u z -iz ~ u = 4 ~ 2 i:i A-95

106 TYLER D Population Age [J Labor Force II Labor Force-Male lifilill Labor Force-Female - <./'J < ""' ""' = u z - E- z u ""' Q,. ""' = o-l ~ 19-6 ~ ~_ ~ ~8~= ~ A-96

107 VICTORIA D Population Age [J Labor Force II Labor Force-Male ffiililj Labor Force-Female - I.I.I (,/') < I.I.I er: u -;z... z I.I.I u er: I.I.I ~ o1- lt_96jo t9_7_o :t:9~7o;_~.:9;.8o~------~ A-97

108 WACO D Population Age LJ Labor Force II Labor Force-Male [1illill Labor Force-Female A-98

109 WICHITA FALLS D Population Age [J Labor Force II Labor Force-Male l]j Labor Force-Female to... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A-.99

110 Table A-9. Place of Residence Based on Occ~tion, 198 Live in Live in Occupation Male Female Male Female Abilene Professional, Technical 2,7 3,2 7 1, 1 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 3,3 1,4 8 4 Sales Workers 2,8 2,5 8 7 Clerical 1,5 5,6 3 2, Armed Forces 4, 3 2 Farming 5 1 1,4 1 Others 12,2 6,2 6,2 2, 1 Amarillo Professional, Technical 4,5 4,7 1, 1, 1 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 5,1 2,1 8 3 Sales Workers 4,8 3,4 8 7 Clerical 2,6 1,1 3 1,6 Armed Forces Farming Others 23,6 9, 1 3,4 1,1 Austin Professional, Technical 2,5 15,3 8,4 6,7 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 12,7 8, 7,7 3,7 Sales Workers 1,5 8,5 5,2 4, 1 Clerical 7,9 27,5 2,6 11,7 Armed Forces 2,3 2 2,3 1 Farming 1, 2 2,4 3 Others 4, 19, 22,5 8,7 Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Professional, Technical 5,8 7, 4,5 4, Managers, Officials, Proprietors 4,4 2, 3,2 1,8 Sales Workers 4,5 4,4 2,6 4, 1 Clerical 2,3 9, 1,8 8,3 Armed Forces 3 1 Farming Others 28,9 11,1 32,2 5,8 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito Professional, Technical 2,8 3,8 7 1, 1 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 3,4 1,4 1,1 6 Sales Workers 3,8 2,8 8 7 Clerical 1,9 6, 5 2, Armed Forces 1 2 Farming 1, 2 2, 2 Others 15,5 7, 1 6,6 3,2 Bryan-College Station Professional, Technical 5, 3,2 7 7 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2, Sales Workers 1,6 1,8 3 3 Clerical 1,1 4,7 2 9 Armed Forces 2 Farming 6 4 Others 9,1 3,6 1,8 5 A-1

111 Table A-9. Place of Residence Based on Occl4>11tion, 198 (cont'd.) Corpus Christi Dallas-Ft. Worth Live in Live in Occupation Male Female Male Female Professional, Technical 7,2 7,5 2,1 2,3 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 7,1 3,3 2, 8 Sales Workers 5,5 5,2 1,5 1, 7 Clerical 3,5 13,3 1,1 3,5 Armed Forces 2,4 3 1 Farming 9 1 2,2 2 Others 33,7 11,5 14, 4, 1 Professional, Technical 5,2 43,6 72,3 54, Managers, Officials, Proprietors 49,5 24,7 73,5 3,2 Sales Workers 39,9 32,7 56,4 43,7 Clerical 27,3 95,3 34,6 13,7 Armed Forces 3,5 3 3,3 2 Farming 3,8 8 8, 1, 7 Others 178, 85,1 239,8 86,1 El Paso Professional, Technical 12,6 11, 5 7 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 1,8 4,3 5 2 Sales Workers 1,2 8, 5 4 Clerical 7,3 18, 1 3 1,4 Armed Forces 9,6 9 8,5 4 Farming 1, 1 8 Others 44,5 21, 7 4,8 2,3 Galveston-Texas City Professional, Technical 3,7 4,2 3,6 2,8 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2,4 1,3 2,6 1,4 Sales Workers 1,5 2, 2, 2,3 Clerical 1, 7 7,4 1,3 5,7 Armed Forces Farming Others 16,2 5,9 15,7 4,4 Houston Professional, Technical 75, 7 6,3 55,3 39,6 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 64,3 31,2 56,4 2,4 Sales Workers 47,8 4,2 37,5 32,5 Clerical 34,6 124,2 2,3 85,8 Armed Forces Farming 3,8 7 6,6 1,2 Others 245,4 8,7 22,5 5,5 Killeen-Temple Professional, Technical 2,3 3, 1,9 2,3 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2,1 1, 1,7 8 Sales Workers 1,8 2, 1,4 1,9 Clerical 1,1 3,7 9 4, Armed Forces 8,4 9 3,3 1,9 Farming 2 1, 1 1 Others 8,8 4,5 9,7 5, A-11

112 Table A-9. Place of Residence Based on Occ~tion, 198 (cont'd.) Live in Live in Occupation Male Female Male Female Laredo Longview-Marshall Lubbock Professional, Technical 1,6 2, 2 2 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 1, Sales Workers 2, 2,4 3 1 Clerical 1,8 3,7 2 4 Armed Forces 1 Farming Others 1,1 2,6 6 1 Professional, Technical 2,6 2,8 1,5 1,3 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2,8 1, 1,4 6 Sales Workers 2,5 2,5 1, 1 1,5 Clerical 1,2 4,2 7 3, Armed Forces 1 Farming Others 14, 5,4 11, 3,7 Professional, Technical 7,4 7,2 6 9 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 6,7 2,6 8 4 Sales Workers 6,6 4,4 8 6 Clerical 3, 11,4 3 1,8 Armed Forces 1,5 1 1,3 1 Farming 9 2 1,9 1 Others 21, 1 9,7 4,7 1,9 McAllen-Pharr-Edinburg Midland Professional, Technical 3, 1 3,3 2,5 2,8 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 3, 1, 2, 1 9 Sales Workers 3,5 2,5 3,2 2,1 Clerical 1,3 4,6 1,6 5,4 Armed Forces 1 1 Farming 1,4 5 5,5 1,5 Others 1,6 5,5 16,5 7,4 Professional, Technical 4,4 2,5 4 2 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 3,8 1, Sales Workers 2,1 1,6 3 2 Clerical 1,3 5,1 2 9 Armed Forces Farming 3 3 Others 9,3 3,4 2,3 5 o~essa Professional, Technical 2,8 2,5 3 3 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 3,5 1,4 5 3 Sales Workers 3,6 2,8 7 7 Clerical 1,1 5,7 2 1,1 Armed Forces 1 Farming Others 16,3 4,5 5,8 1,2 A-12

113 Table A-9. Place of Residence Based on Occupation, 198 (cont d.) San Angelo San Antonio Sherman-Denison Texarkana Tyler Victoria. Live in Live in Occupation Male Female Male Female Professional, Technical 1,9 2,3 2 3 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2, Sales Workers 2,4 1,9 3 2 Clerical 1, 4,7 1 7 Armed Forces 1, Farming Others 9,9 5,5 1,5 6 Professional, Technical 2,5 21,5 9,5 8,6 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 19,5 9,5 1, 4,3 Sales Workers 17,6 16,8 7,9 6,2 Clerical 15, 41,8 3,9 15,8 Armed Forces 13,6 3,4 21,3 4,5 Farming 2,1 4 2,3 4 Others 94, 38,8 28,8 11,4 Professional, Technical 1,5 1,6 1, 1 1, Managers, Officials, Proprietors 1, Sales Workers 1,4 1,2 6 7 Clerical 1, 2,9 3 1,5 Armed Forces Farming Others 7,8 4,3 5,5 2,5 Professional, Technical 1, Managers, Officials, Proprietors 1, Sales Workers , Clerical 5 1,5 6 2,8 Armed Forces 1 Farming 1 4 Others 3,7 1,8 6, 1 2,1 Professional, Technical 2,7 2,3 1,3 1,6 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2,6 1, 1,5 6 Sales Workers 2, 2, 1,3 1,4 Clerical 1, 4, 7 3, 1 Armed Forces Farming Others 9,4 4,4 9,2 3,5 Professional, Technical 1,6 1,5 5 3 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 1, Sales Workers 1,4 1,6 4 4 Clerical 4 2,6 2 9 Armed Forces Farming Others 9,4 2,3 3,2 8 A-13

114 Table A-9. Place of Residence Based on Occupation, 198 (cont'd.) Live in Live in Occupation Male Female Male Female Waco Wichita Falls Small Texas MSAs Medium Texas MSAs Large Texas MSAs Professional, Technical 3, 1 3,3 1,9 1,9 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2,7 1,3 2, 9 Sales Workers 2,5 2, 2, 1 1,6 Clerical 1,5 5,5 1,1 4, Armed Forces 1 Farming 4 1, 1 Others 12,5 6,7 9,9 4,2 Professional, Technical 2,4 2,8 8 1, Managers, Officials, Proprietors 2,8 1,2 1, 4 Sales Workers 2,4 2,1 8 7 Clerical 1,2 5, 5 1,9 Armed Forces 6,4 1,4 2 Farming Others 12,7 5,9 6, 1 2,2 Professional, Technical Managers, Officials, Proprietors 41,9 39, 39,7 16, 1 15, 13,9 14,6 6,5 Sales Workers 33,8 3,2 12,6 12,4 Clerical 19,2 72,9 6,8 3,3 Armed Forces Farming 13, 5,2 2, , 1 1 1, Others 176, 1 71,6 88,4 29,5 Professional, Technical 61,7 58, 1 21,1 2,8 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 5,3 23,6 19, 9,1 Sales Workers Clerical 46,4 28,2 37,9 93,6 16, 9,2 15,6 38, 1 Armed Forces 24,8 2,5 43, 2,5 Farming 7, 1,4 16,5 2,6 Others 23,2 9,2 11,9 38,4 Professional, Technical 146,3 125,4 137, 1 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 133,3 65,3 139,9 12,2 54,9 Sales Workers 15,3 89,7 11,8 82,3 Clerical 76,8 261,2 58,8 232,3 Armed Forces 18, 3,8 25,2 4,8 Farming 9,7 1,9 16,9 3,3 Others 517,4 24,6 471,2 148, Texas Metropolitan Professional, Technical 249,9 223,1 173,2 137,6 Managers, Officials, Proprietors 222,6 15 I 1 172,9 7,5 Sales Workers 185,5 157,7 13,3 11,3 Clerical 124,3 427,7 74,8 3,7 Armed Forces 55,7 8,5 68,9 7,4 Farming 22, 3,9 41,5 7, Others 896,7 366,3 67,4 215,9 A-14

115 Table A-1. Percent Change in N!Jlber of "orkers frolll 196 to 198 Live in Live in Occupation Male Female Male Female Abi Lene Professional, Technical Managers, Officials, Proprietors Sales Workers Clerical Armed Forces Farming Others Amarillo Professional, Technical Managers, Officials, Proprietors Sales Workers ,419 Clerical Armed Forces Farming Others Austin Professional, Technical ,469 2,42 Managers, Officials, Proprietors ,25 3,488 Sales Workers ,12 2, 173 Clerical ,523 Armed Forces 56 5, Farming Others ,29 Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange Professional, Technical Managers, Officials, Proprietors Sales Workers Clerical Armed Forces Farming Others Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito Corpus Christi Professional, Technical Managers, Officials, Proprietors Sales Workers Clerical Armed Forces Farming Others Professional, Technical Managers, Officials, Proprietors Sales Workers Clerical Armed Forces 153 1, Farming Others A-15