LAMPIRAN 1. Lampiran Nama dan Kondisi Perusahaan Textile No Kode Nama Perusahaan Hasil z-score FD Non-FD
|
|
|
- Whitney Campbell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 87 LAMPIRAN 1. Lampiran Nama dan Kondisi Perusahaan Textile No Kode Nama Perusahaan Hasil z-score FD Non-FD 1 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 1, ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 0, CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1, ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 5, ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1, HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1, INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 2, MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1, PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 2, POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 4, RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 2, SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1, STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1, TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 2, UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 2, ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 2, ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 1, CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1, ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 4, ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1, HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1, INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1, MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1, PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 1, POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 5, RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 2, SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1, STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1, TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 3, UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 2,
2 88 31 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 1, ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 1, CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1, ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 1, ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1, HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1, INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1, MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1, PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 2, POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 4, RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 1, SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1, STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1, TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 4, UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 1, ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 2, ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 0, CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1, ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 1, ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 2, HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1, INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1, MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1, PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 2, POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 5, RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 1, SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1, STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1, TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 4,16 60 UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 1, ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 2, ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 2, CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1, ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 1,
3 89 65 ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1, HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 0, INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1, MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 2, PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 3, POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 7, RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 1, SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1, STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1, TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 4, UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 1, Lampiran Hasil Hitung Variabel Penelitian X1 X2 X3 X4 Y 1,14 0,01 0,70 5,58 1 0,61 0,09 0,85 5,67 1 0,70 0,03 0,08 4,65 1 0,42 0,42 0,19 4,62 0 0,90 0,01 0,56 2,91 1 0,84 0,00 0,46 0,52 1 1,09 0,05 0,49 7,24 1 0,43 0,12 0,90 13,65 1 1,23 0,04 0,81 3,74 1 0,15 0,00 0,23 9,64 0 1,82 0,02 0,45 2,72 1 2,01 0,01 0,63 1,78 1 0,64 0,01 0,40 1,86 1 1,00 0,05 0,53 7,92 1 1,21 0,01 0,23 2,91 1 1,34 0,05 0,51 5,45 1 1,03 0,07 0,93 4,48 1 1,06 0,10 0,84 6,58 1 0,99 0,49 0,40 3,
4 90 1,23 0,01 0,60 2,81 1 0,99 0,02 0,44 1,32 1 1,10 0,01 0,56 7,46 1 0,46 0,07 0,97 10,38 1 1,44 0,08 0,46 5,13 1 0,20 0,01 0,01 7,01 0 1,78 0,02 0,45 2,75 1 1,83 0,03 0,65 1,03 1 1,68 0,01 0,33 3,84 1 1,19 0,09 0,24 9,83 0 1,13 0,01 0,21 3,24 1 2,15 0,01 0,47 4,93 1 0,66 0,07 0,88 3,33 1 1,02 0,12 0,93 5,51 1 1,04 0,01 0,80 4,57 1 0,95 0,05 0,55 2,49 1 0,93 0,00 0,53 4,36 1 1,12 0,00 0,57 0,67 1 0,50 0,07 1,03 2,75 1 1,28 0,03 0,58 5,30 1 0,21 0,08 0,50 0,74 0 2,25 0,01 0,56 0,58 1 1,72 0,02 0,65 1,42 1 1,92 0,00 0,35 2,61 1 1,61 0,02 0,23 1,07 0 0,57 0,00 0,37 2,50 1 2,64 0,00 0,43 4,58 1 0,67 0,03 0,86 3,13 1 0,49 0,00 0,93 0,59 1 1,01 0,02 0,77 0,62 1 0,86 0,07 0,59 2,04 1 0,45 0,09 0,70 0,82 1 1,12 0,00 0,59 0,49 1 0,48 0,02 1,05 3,
5 91 3,34 0,04 0,58 0,71 1 0,21 0,09 0,51 0,76 0 2,10 0,01 0,57 0,98 1 1,31 0,02 0,66 1,66 1 1,87 0,00 0,35 3,87 1 1,61 0,02 0,18 0,62 0 0,40 0,00 0,47 2,30 1 2,55 0,05 0,37 5,75 1 0,41 0,21 1,15 5,22 1 0,50 0,01 0,91 6,01 1 1,74 0,00 0,37 2,89 1 0,71 0,08 0,66 1,93 1 0,95 0,02 0,85 0,86 1 1,08 0,01 0,59 0,21 1 0,42 0,08 1,13 0,43 1 3,86 0,03 0,44 0,57 0 0,16 0,29 0,66 1,24 0 1,75 0,01 0,66 2,68 1 1,20 0,02 0,67 1,49 1 1,74 0,00 0,37 2,89 1 1,84 0,01 0,15 1,86 0 0,45 0,01 0,45 2, Lampiran Hasil SPSS 1. Deksriptif Statistik Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation LIKUIDITAS 75,15 3,86 1,1665,71782 PROFIT 75,00,49,0489,08325 SOLVA 75,01 1,15,5704,25116 AKTIVITAS 75,21 13,65 3,4092 2,68486 FD 75,00 1,00,8400,36907 Valid N (listwise) 75 91
6 92 2. Regresi Logistik Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases a N Percent Included in Analysis ,0 Selected Cases Missing Cases 0,0 Total ,0 Unselected Cases 0,0 Total ,0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value,00 0 1,00 1 Iteration History a,b,c Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant 1 66,909 1,360 Step ,957 1, ,950 1, ,950 1,658 a. Constant is included in the model. b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 65,950 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 92
7 93 Classification Table a,b Observed FD,00 1,00 Predicted Percentage Correct Step 0 FD, ,0 1, ,0 Overall Percentage 84,0 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is,500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant 1,658,315 27,717 1,000 5,250 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. LIKUIDITAS,468 1,494 Step 0 Variables PROFIT 13,447 1,000 SOLVA 15,366 1,000 AKTIVITAS,002 1,966 Overall Statistics 32,427 4,000 Iteration History a,b,c,d Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant LIKUIDITAS PROFIT SOLVA AKTIVITAS 1 44,829 -,380,228-7,923 3,048, ,562-1,206,200-15,931 6,062, ,875-2,012,000-29,527 9,606,149 Step ,804-2,627 -,130-45,552 12,641, ,477-2,861 -,215-54,677 14,277, ,466-2,902 -,236-56,617 14,645, ,466-2,904 -,237-56,702 14,661, ,466-2,904 -,237-56,702 14,661,292 93
8 94 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig. Step 40,485 4,000 Step 1 Block 40,485 4,000 Model 40,485 4,000 Model Summary Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square 1 25,466 a,417,713 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter estimates changed by less than,001. Hosmer and Lemeshow Test Step Chi-square df Sig. 1 4,760 7,689 Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test FD =,00 FD = 1,00 Total Observed Expected Observed Expected 1 7 7,157 1, , , , , , ,603 8 Step 1 5 1, , , , , , , , , ,
9 95 Classification Table a Observed FD,00 1,00 Predicted Percentage Correct Step 1 FD, ,0 1, ,4 Overall Percentage 94,7 a. The cut value is,500 Correlation Matrix Constant LIKUIDITAS PROFIT SOLVA AKTIVITAS Constant 1,000 -,422,123 -,601 -,604 LIKUIDITAS -,422 1,000,359 -,224 -,032 Step 1 PROFIT,123,359 1,000 -,725 -,323 SOLVA -,601 -,224 -,725 1,000,413 AKTIVITAS -,604 -,032 -,323,413 1,000 95
10 96 Hasil Uji Kolmogorov Smirnov One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test LIKUIDITAS PROFIT SOLVA AKTIVITAS FD N Normal Parameters a,b Mean 1,1665,0489,5704 3,4092,8400 Std. Deviation,71782,08325, ,68486,36907 Most Extreme Differences Absolute,131,278,082,134,508 Positive,131,230,082,134,332 Negative -,078 -,278 -,058 -,120 -,508 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,138 2,411,712 1,158 4,397 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed),150,000,691,137,000 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Hasil Uji KS setelah transformasi One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test LIKUIDITAS LN_PROF SOLVA AKTIVITAS LN_FD N Normal Parameters a,b Mean 1,1665-3,4425,5704 3,4092,0000 Std. Deviation, ,04971, ,68486,00000 c Most Extreme Differences Absolute,131,172,082,134 Positive,131,172,082,134 Negative -,078 -,134 -,058 -,120 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,138 1,358,712 1,158 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed),150,050,691,137 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. c. The distribution has no variance for this variable. One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test cannot be performed. 96
11 97 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test LIKUIDITAS LN_PROF SOLVA AKTIVITAS LN_FD Unstandardized Residual N Normal Parameters a,b Mean 1,1665-3,4425,5704 3,4092,0000, Std. Deviation, ,04971, ,68486,00000 c, Most Extreme Differences Absolute,131,172,082,134,127 Positive,131,172,082,134,076 Negative -,078 -,134 -,058 -,120 -,127 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,138 1,358,712 1,158,999 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed),150,050,691,137,271 a. Test distribution is Normal. 3. Asumsi Klasik ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 4, ,041 12,141,000 b 1 Residual 4,886 57,086 Total 9, a. Dependent Variable: FD b. Predictors: (Constant), AKTIVITAS, SOLVA, LN_PROF, LIKUIDITAS 97
12 98 Model Summary b Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson 1,678 a,460,422, ,342 a. Predictors: (Constant), AKTIVITAS, SOLVA, LN_PROF, LIKUIDITAS b. Dependent Variable: FD Coefficients a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta t Sig. (Constant) -,443,201-2,209,031 LIKUIDITAS,046,058,086,796,429 1 LN_PROF -,169,039 -,460-4,318,000 SOLVA,914,152,617 5,999,000 AKTIVITAS,025,014,181 1,780,080 a. Dependent Variable: FD 98
13 99 99
Lampiran 1 Tabel 3.1 Sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan Sumber : didownload tanggal 13 November 2016 (data diolah)
72 Lampiran 1 Tabel 3.1 Sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 ALKA PT. Alakasa Industrindo Tbk 2 BIMA PT. Primarindo Asia Infrastructure Tbk 3 BRNA PT. Berlina Tbk 4 ETWA PT. Eterindo Wahanatama Tbk 5 FASW
DATA PENELITIAN 1. CAR CAR (%)
DATA PENELITIAN. CAR No. Tahun Nama Bank CAR (%) Arta Niaga Kencana 2,8 2 Artha Graha 0,58 3 Asiatic -9,9 4 Danpac 25,74 5 Global International 42, 6 Harmoni 7,47 7 IFI 22,62 8 Bukopin 20,37 9 International
Lampiran 1 DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN (Menyajikan Laporan Keuangan Secara Berturut-turut)
Lampiran 1 DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2014-2016 (Menyajikan Laporan Keuangan Secara Berturut-turut) NO KODE NAMA PERUSAHAAN 1 ALKA PT ALASKA INDONESIA TBK
HASIL OUTPUT SPSS. Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES
139 HASIL OUTPUT SPSS Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % 100 100.0 Cases Excluded a 0.0 Total 100 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability
Lampiran 1: Nama Perusahaan yang menjadi Sampel Penelitian
LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1: Nama Perusahaan yang menjadi Sampel Penelitian NO. KODE NAMA PERUSAHAAN 1. INTA PT Intraco Penta Tbk 2. JKON PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk 3. KONI PT Perdana Bangun Pusaka
Rata-Rata Nilai Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) Perusahaan Otomotif yang 0, ,97 0, ,44 1,9 1,6 1,4 1,7 1,65
Lampiran I Rata-Rata Nilai Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) Perusahaan Otomotif yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2013 DER No Kode Nama perusahaan 2010 2011 2012 2013 Rata-rata 1. ASII PT Astra
LAMPIRAN DAFTAR SAMPEL PENELITIAN. Kriteria No. Nama Perusahaan. Sampel Emiten
LAMPIRAN DAFTAR SAMPEL PENELITIAN Kode Kriteria No. Nama Perusahaan Sampel Emiten 1 2 3 1. AGRO PT. Bank Agroniaga, Tbk 1 2. BABP PT. Bank ICB Bumiputera Indonesia, Tbk X - 3. BBCA PT. Bank Central Asia,
Daftar Sampel Perusahaan
Lampiran i Daftar Sampel Perusahaan NAMA PERUSAHAAN PT. Bank Bukopin Tbk PT. Bank Bumi Arta Tbk PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk PT. Bank CIMB Niaga Tbk PT. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk PT. Bank Ekonomi Raharja
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION. 1. Independent commissioner boards proportion does not negatively affect
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION 5.. Conclusion Based on data analysis that has been done, researcher may draw following conclusions:. Independent commissioner boards proportion does not
Lampiran i Jadwal Penelitian
Lampiran i Jadwal Penelitian Tahap penelitian Juni Juli Agust Sept Oktb Pengajuan Judul Penyetujuan proposal Penyelesain proposal Bimbingan skripisi 81 Lampiran i (lanjutan) Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Manufaktur
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN. Daftar Perusahaan yang dijadikan sampel
83 DAFTAR LAMPIRAN Daftar Perusahaan yang dijadikan sampel No KODE Nama perusahaan 01 ALKA Alakasa Industrindo Tbk 02 ALMI Alumindo Light Metal Industri Tbk 03 AMFG Asahimas Flat Glass Tbk 04 ASTRA Astra
. Enter. Model Summary b. Std. Error. of the. Estimate. Change. a. Predictors: (Constant), Emphaty, reliability, Assurance, responsive, Tangible
LAMPIRAN Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Model Variables Entered Removed Method 1 Emphaty, reliability, Assurance, responsive, Tangible a. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable:
Lampiran 1. Data Perusahaan
Lampiran. Data Perusahaan NO PERUSH MV EARN DIV CFO LB.USAHA TOT.ASS ACAP 3 9 8 5 369 9678 376 ADES 75-35 - 6 3559-5977 7358 3 AQUA 5 368 65 335 797 678 53597 BATA 88 5 9 863 958 93 5 BKSL 5.3 -. 9-9 5
Lampiran IV. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Analisis Deskriptif
182 Lampiran IV. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Analisis Deskriptif Frequencies Statistics Kinerja Guru Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek Motivasi Kerja Guru Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru N Valid 64 64 64 64 Missing
Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Pertambangan. 4 BORN Borneo Lumbung Energy & Metal, Tbk
Lampiran i Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Pertambangan No Kode Sampel 1 ADRO Adaro Energy, Tbk 2 ANTM Aneka Tambang (Persero), Tbk 3 ATPK ATPK Resources, Tbk 4 BORN Borneo Lumbung Energy
Lampiran 1. Daftar Sampel Perusahaan
Lampiran 1. Daftar Sampel Perusahaan NO. KODE NAMA PERUSAHAAN 1 ARNA Arwana Citramulia Tbk. 2 ASII Astra Internastional Tbk. 3 AUTO Astra otoparts Tbk. 4 BTON Betonjaya Manunggal Tbk 5 DVLA Darya-Varia
Perusahaan Consumer Goods yang Terdaftar di BEI ( ) Nama Perusahaan Perusahaan 1
LAMPIRAN 1 Perusahaan Consumer Goods yang Terdaftar di BEI (2010-2012) No. Sub Sektor Kode Nama Perusahaan Perusahaan 1 ADES Akasha Wira Internasional Tbk 2 AISA Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk 3 ALTO Tri
Daftar Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property
Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property Kriteria No Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 2 3 Sampel 1 APLN Agung Podomoro Land Tbk 2 ASRI Alam Sutera Realty Tbk 1 3 ELTY Bakrieland Development Tbk 4 BAPA
DATA SAMPEL TAHUN 2006
DATA SAMPEL TAHUN 2006 No Nama Emiten CGPI Kode Saham Harga Saham EPS PER Laba Bersih 1 Bank Niaga 89.27 BNGA 920 54 17.02 647,732 2 Bank Mandiri 83.66 BMRI 2,900 118 24.65 2,422,472 3 Astra International
Data Nama Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI.
LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1 Data Nama Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI. No Kode Perusahaan Nama Perusahaan 1 AGRO Bank Rakyat Indonesia Agroniaga Tbk 2 BMRI Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk 3 BMAS PT Bank
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN I LAMPRIAN PDRB Harga Berlaku NO KAB/KOTA 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 1 Asahan 15527794210 6429147880 8174125380 9505603030 10435935630 11931676610 2 Dairi 2303591460 2552751860 2860204810 3116742540
Industry Classification/Stock Name
Lampiran 1 : Data Perusahaan Sampel Industry Classification/Stock Name 1. AGRICULTURE Plantation 1 AALI Astra Argo Lestari Tbk (S) 2 LSIP PP London Sumatera Tbk (S) 3 SGRO Sampoerna Agro Tbk (S) 4 SMAR
LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN SAMPEL PERIODE
69 LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN SAMPEL PERIODE 2008-2010 No Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 AISA PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk 2 ARNA PT Arwana Citramulia Tbk 3 ASII PT Astra International Tbk 4 AUTO PT Astra
TRY OUT 30 Responden Variabel Kompetensi/ x1
1 TRY OUT 30 Responden Variabel Kompetensi/ x1 Case Processing Summary N % 30 100.0 Cases Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics
LAMPIRAN I Data Perusahaan Sampel kode DPS EPS Ekuitas akpi ,97 51,04 40,
LAMPIRAN I Data Perusahaan Sampel kode DPS EPS Ekuitas 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 akpi 34 8 9 50,97 51,04 40,67 1.029.336.000.000 1.035.846.000.000 1.107.566.000.000 asii 216 216 177
LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1 Data Sampel Penelitian
LAMPIRAN Lampiran Data Sampel Penelitian Variabel Karakteristik Auditor pada Perusahaan Sampel Ukuran KAP No Kode 2 2 22 23 (Aryanto, Amir AGRO Jusuf, Mawar & Saptoto) 2 BABP 3 BACA 4 BAEK 5 BBCA 6 BBKP
LAMPIRAN A. Tabulasi Data Perusahaan Sample
LAMPIRAN A Tabulasi Data Perusahaan Sample Current Ratio (%) NO Kode Emiten Nama Perusahaan ASII Astra International Tbk. 2 AUTO Astra Otoparts Tbk. 3 BATA Sepatu Bata Tbk. 4 BRAM Indo Kordsa Tbk 5 BRNA
UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILIAS VARIABEL KOMPENSASI
1 UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILIAS VARIABEL KOMPENSASI Case Processing Summary N % 20 100.0 Cases Excluded a 0.0 Total 20 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics
LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I. Daftar Populasi Perusahaan Properti dan Real Estate di Bursa Efek Indonesia No Kode. Kriteria Nama Perusahaan Emiten 1 2 3
LAMPIRAN Lampiran I Daftar Populasi Perusahaan Properti dan Real Estate di Bursa Efek Indonesia No Kode Kriteria Nama Perusahaan Emiten 1 2 3 Sampel 1 ASRI Alam Sutera Reality Tbk 1 2 BAPA Bekasi Asri
Lampiran 1. Proses Pemilihan Sampel. Universitas Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 1 Proses Pemilihan Sampel No. Kode Emiten Nama Perusahaan Tanggal Pengumuman Stock Split Kriteria Pemilihan Sampel 1 2 3 4 Sampel 1. CTBN Citra Tubindo 12 Januari Tbk 2009 2. ARNA Arwana 11 September
Lampiran 1. Daftar Perusahaan Sampel. No Kode Nama Perusahaan
Lampiran 1. Daftar Perusahaan Sampel No Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 ADES PT Akasha Wira Internasional (d/h Ades Waters Indonesia) Tbk. 2 AISA PT Tiga Pilar Sejahterah (d/h Asia Intiselera) Tbk. 3 ALMI PT Alumindo
TRY OUT 25 Responden Variabel Kepuasan / x1
1 TRY OUT 25 Responden Variabel Kepuasan / x1 Case Processing Summary N % 25 100.0 Cases Excluded a 0.0 Total 25 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics
LAMPIRAN 1. Tabel 1. Data Indeks Harga Saham PT. ANTAM, tbk Periode 20 Januari Februari 2012
LAMPIRAN 1 Tabel 1. Data Indeks Harga Saham PT. ANTAM, tbk Periode 20 Januari 2011 29 Februari 2012 No Tanggal Indeks Harga Saham No Tanggal Indeks Harga Saham 1 20-Jan-011 2.35 138 05-Agst-011 1.95 2
LAMPIRAN. Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur yang menjadi sampel. 1 AMFG PT.Asahimas Flat Glass Tbk 1. 2 INDF PT. Indofood Skses Makmur Tbk 2
LAMPIRAN Lampiran i Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur yang menjadi sampel No Kode Populasi Kriteria Sampel 1 2 3 4 1 AMFG PT.Asahimas Flat Glass 1 2 INDF PT. Indofood Skses Makmur 2 3 UNIT PT.Nusantara Inti
LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Data deviden untuk menghitung economic performance tahun
LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1. Data deviden untuk menghitung economic performance tahun 2011-2013 No Kode 2011 2012 2013 Div Div Div 1 SMCB 23 32 48 2 UNVR 250 300 300 3 AMFG 80 80 80 4 INTP 263 293 450 5 ICBP 116
Lampiran 1. Tabel Sampel Penelitian
Lampiran 1 Tabel Sampel Penelitian No Kode Emiten Nama Perusahaan Tanggal IPO 1 APLN Agung Podomoro Land Tbk 11 Nov 2010 2 ASRI Alam Sutera Reality Tbk 18 Dec 2007 3 BAPA Bekasi Asri Pemula Tbk 14 Jan
Team project 2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP
Hak cipta dan penggunaan kembali: Lisensi ini mengizinkan setiap orang untuk menggubah, memperbaiki, dan membuat ciptaan turunan bukan untuk kepentingan komersial, selama anda mencantumkan nama penulis
Daftar Nama Perusaahan. yang ada di Industri Consumer Goods periode
99 Lampiran 1 Daftar Nama Perusaahan yang ada di Industri Consumer Goods periode 2013-2016 KODE AISA ALTO CEKA CLEO DLTA ICBP INDF HOKI MLBI MYOR PSDN ROTI SKBM SKLT STTP ULTJ GGRM HMSP RMBA WIIM CINT
Lampiran 1. Daftar perusahaan sampel
Lampiran 1. Daftar perusahaan sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan 1. ADES Akasha Wira International Tbk 2. AISA Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk 3. AKKU Alam Karya Unggul Tbk 4. ALKA Alaska Industrindo Tbk 5.
Lampiran 1. Sampel Penelitian No. Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 AISA Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk 2 AKPI Argha Karya Prima Industry Tbk 3 ALKA Alaska
Lampiran 1. Sampel Penelitian No. Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 AISA Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk 2 AKPI Argha Karya Prima Industry Tbk 3 ALKA Alaska Industrindo Tbk 4 ALMI Alumindo Light Metal Industry Tbk
LAMPIRAN 1 Perusahaan Sampel Penelitian Tahun
LAMPIRAN 1 Perusahaan Sampel Penelitian Tahun 2008-2010 No. Perusahaan Kode Tahun 1. PT. Gozco Plantation Tbk. GZCO 2008 2. PT. Indika Energy Tbk. INDY 2008 3. PT. Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk. ADHI 2008 4.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 1 DATA AWAL PERUSAHAAN SAMPEL No. KODE NAMA PERUSAHAAN AGE (Tahun) PPS (%) SIZE (Rupiah) UNDERP RICING (%) 1 EMTK Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk 26,44 10 4.314.284.667.000 1 2 PTPP PT PP (PERSERO)
LAMPIRAN I FORMULIR SURVEI
LAMPIRAN I FORMULIR SURVEI 56 Universitas Kristen Maranatha L.1.1 FORMULIR SURVEI KEBISINGAN LALULINTAS Lokasi : Cuaca : Hari/Tanggal : Surveyor : Periode / menit 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Daftar Perusahaan Sektor Property and Realestate yang terdaftar di BEI
83 LAMPIRAN 1 Daftar Perusahaan Sektor Property and Realestate yang terdaftar di BEI Kode Nama Perusahaan No Saham 1 APLN Agung Podomoro Land Tbk 2 ASRI Alam Sutera Reality Tbk 3 BAPA Bekasi Asri Pemula
a. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 7 citra tahun 2001 b. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 4 citra tahun 2006
Dependent Variable: Suhu Regression Standardized Residual of Plot P-P Normal Dependent Variable: Suhu Regression Standardized Residual of Plot P-P Normal Lampiran 1. Hasil Uji Normalitas a. Uji kenormalan
Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Sampel 2012
90 Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Sampel 2012 No Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 BTON Betonjaya Manunggal Tbk 2 GDST Gunawan Dianjaya Steel Tbk 3 KBLM Kabelindo Murni Tbk 4 LMPI Langgeng Makmur Industri Tbk 5 PICO
Lampiran 1 Daftar Populasi dan Sampel Perusahaan Manufaktur Periode
Lampiran Daftar Populasi dan Sampel Perusahaan Manufaktur Periode 200-203 No. KODE Perusahaan Kriteria Sampel 2 3 ADES Akasha Wira Internasional Tbk x - 2 ADMG Polychem Indonesia Tbk x - 3 AHAD Asuransi
Data Hasil Olahan Populasi
LAMPIRAN 1 Data Hasil Olahan Populasi No. Kode Bank Nama Bank Kriteria 1 Kriteria 2 Sampel terpilih 1. AGRO Bank Rakyat Indonesia Agro Niaga Tbk 2. AGRS Bank Agris Tbk X X 3. BABP Bank MNC Internasional
Appendix B STATISTICAL TABLES OVERVIEW
Appendix B STATISTICAL TABLES OVERVIEW Table B.1: Proportions of the Area Under the Normal Curve Table B.2: 1200 Two-Digit Random Numbers Table B.3: Critical Values for Student s t-test Table B.4: Power
Lampiran 1. Penjualan PT Honda Mandiri Bogor
LAMPIRAN 64 Lampiran 1. Penjualan PT Honda Mandiri Bogor 29-211 PENJUALAN 29 TYPE JAN FEB MAR APR MEI JUNI JULI AGT SEP OKT NOV DES TOTA JAZZ 16 14 22 15 23 19 13 28 15 28 3 25 248 FREED 23 25 14 4 13
Lampiran 1. Sampel Nama Perusahaan No Kode Perusahaan
Lampiran 1. Sampel ama Perusahaan o Kode Perusahaan ama Perusahaan 1 ITP Indocement Tunggal Prakasa Tbk 2 SMCB Holcim Indonesia Tbk 3 SMGR Semen Gresik Tbk 4 AMFG Asahimas Flat Glass Tbk 5 ARA Arwana Citra
Lampiran 1. Uji Validitas dan Reliability Variabel Kualitas Pelayanan
Lampira 1. Uji itas da Reliability Variabel Kualitas Pelayaa 1 Frequecy Percet Percet Percet Kurag setuju 14 14.1 14.1 14.1 Ragu-ragu 57 57.6 57.6 71.7 Setuju 24 24.2 24.2 96.0 Sagat Setuju 4 4.0 4.0 100.0
Daftar Nama Perusahaan Sampel Tahun 2010
LAMPIRAN Daftar Nama Perusahaan Sampel Tahun 2010 No Kode Perusahaan Nama Perusahaan 1 INTP PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk 2 SMGR PT Semen Indonesia Persero Tbk 3 ARNA PT Arwana Citramulia Tbk 4 TOTO
Team project 2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP
Hak cipta dan penggunaan kembali: Lisensi ini mengizinkan setiap orang untuk menggubah, memperbaiki, dan membuat ciptaan turunan bukan untuk kepentingan komersial, selama anda mencantumkan nama penulis
MODUL PELATIHAN SEM ANANDA SABIL HUSSEIN, PHD
MODUL PELATIHAN SEM ANANDA SABIL HUSSEIN, PHD PUSAT KAJIAN DAN PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT JURUSAN MANAJEMEN UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA 2018 1) 2) ANALISA JALUR 1) LMK = 27,209 3,599IPK + 1,749 x 10-7 US + 0,019JR
Getting Started with Correlated Component Regression (CCR) in XLSTAT-CCR
Tutorial 1 Getting Started with Correlated Component Regression (CCR) in XLSTAT-CCR Dataset for running Correlated Component Regression This tutorial 1 is based on data provided by Michel Tenenhaus and
Lampiran 1. Kriteria Pemilihan Sampel
Lampiran 1 Kriteria Pemilihan Sampel Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Kriteria Sampel No Nama Perusahaan Kode Listing 1 2 3 1 Indocemen Tunggal Prakasa, Tbk. INTP 05/12/1989 1 2 Semen
MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT MODEL ON THE ROAD SECTION OF HIGHLANDS REGION BY USING GENELARIZED LINEAR MODEL
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 8, Issue 10, October 2017, pp. 1249-1258 1248, Article ID: IJCIET_08_10_127 Available online at http://http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=8&itype=10
Important Formulas. Discrete Probability Distributions. Probability and Counting Rules. The Normal Distribution. Confidence Intervals and Sample Size
blu38582_if_1-8.qxd 9/27/10 9:19 PM Page 1 Important Formulas Chapter 3 Data Description Mean for individual data: Mean for grouped data: Standard deviation for a sample: X2 s X n 1 or Standard deviation
DAFTAR SAMPEL PERUSAHAAN
DAFTAR SAMPEL PERUSAHAAN NO KODE NAMA PERUSAHAAN 1 ADES PT Ades Alfindo Putrasetia Tbk 2 AQUA PT Aqua Golden Mississippi Tbk 3 CEKA PT Cahaya Kalbar Tbk 4 DAVO PT Davomas Abadi Tbk 5 DLTA PT Delta Djakarta
Review of Upstate Load Forecast Uncertainty Model
Review of Upstate Load Forecast Uncertainty Model Arthur Maniaci Supervisor, Load Forecasting & Energy Efficiency New York Independent System Operator Load Forecasting Task Force June 17, 2011 Draft for
fruitfly fecundity example summary Tuesday, July 17, :13:19 PM 1
fruitfly fecundity example summary Tuesday, July 17, 2018 02:13:19 PM 1 The UNIVARIATE Procedure Variable: fecund line = NS Basic Statistical Measures Location Variability Mean 33.37200 Std Deviation 8.94201
APPENDIX A. A.1 Sample of Indian MFIs
APPENDIX A A.1 Sample of Indian MFIs S.N. Sample of Indian MFIs Inception Legal Form 1 SEWA 1974 BANK 2 CRESA 1980 NGO 3 SKDRDP 1982 NGO 4 GRAMA VIDYALAY 1983 NGO 5 JANODAYA 1987 NGO 6 RASS 1989 NGO 7
THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC)
THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC) FULLY AUTOMATED ASTM D2983 CONDITIONING AND TESTING ON THE CANNON TESC SYSTEM WHITE PAPER A critical performance parameter for transmission, gear, and hydraulic
Influence of motorcycles lane to the traffic volume and travel speed in Denpasar, Indonesia
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science PAPER OPEN ACCESS Influence of motorcycles lane to the traffic volume and travel speed in Denpasar, Indonesia To cite this article: A M Mulyadi 2018
Antonio Olmos Priyalatha Govindasamy Research Methods & Statistics University of Denver
Antonio Olmos Priyalatha Govindasamy Research Methods & Statistics University of Denver American Evaluation Association Conference, Chicago, Ill, November 2015 AEA 2015, Chicago Ill 1 Paper overview Propensity
: ( .
2 27 ( ) 2 3 4 2 ( ) 59 Y n n U i ( ) & smith H 98 Draper N Curran PJ,bauer DJ & Willoughby Kam,Cindy &Robert 23 MT24 Jaccard,J & Rebert T23 Franzese 23 Aiken LS & West SG 99 " Multiple Regression Testing
LAMPIRAN UJI VALIDITAS
LAMPIRAN UJI VALIDITAS 1 e1 e2,00 Q1,04 Q2,01 -,04 e3 Q3,00 -,21 -,09 e4 Q4,49 -,01 e5 Q5,70,50,71 e6 Q6,47,69,74 e7 Q7,54,41,08 e8 Q8,17 e9 Q9,01 e10 Q10 Kompetensi Guru Chi-Square = 78,430 Probabilitas
Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. March 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA
Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association
Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. March 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association
Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA
Author s Accepted Manuscript
Author s Accepted Manuscript Dataset on statistical analysis of Jet A-1 fuel laboratory properties for on-spec into-plane operations Aderibigbe Israel Adekitan, Tobi Shomefun, Temitope M. John, Bukola
Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests
Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences from
Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. March 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association
Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests
Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests February 2017 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences
From Developing Credit Risk Models Using SAS Enterprise Miner and SAS/STAT. Full book available for purchase here.
From Developing Credit Risk Models Using SAS Enterprise Miner and SAS/STAT. Full book available for purchase here. About this Book... ix About the Author... xiii Acknowledgments...xv Chapter 1 Introduction...
Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP
Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP October 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences
Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests
Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests February 2017 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences
Stat 301 Lecture 30. Model Selection. Explanatory Variables. A Good Model. Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables
Model Selection Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables Indicator variables for types of car Sports Car, SUV, Wagon, Minivan 1 Explanatory Variables Engine size (liters) Cylinders (number)
FACTORS INFLUENCING ROAD ACCIDENTS IN SRI LANKA: A LOGISTIC REGRESSION APPROACH. Introduction
FACTORS INFLUENCING ROAD ACCIDENTS IN SRI LANKA: A LOGISTIC REGRESSION APPROACH S.A.T. Dhananjaya 1, M.C. Alibuhtto 2 1 Faculty of Applied Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka 2 Department
LAMPIRAN. Populasi dan Sampel
LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN 1 Populasi dan Sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan Kriteria Sampel 1 2 3 4 1. ALTO Tri Banyan Tirta Tbk Sampel 1 2. ASSA Adi Sarana Armada Tbk Sampel 2 3. BEST Bekasi Fajar Industrial Estate
Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Econometrics I. Fall Seyed Mahdi Barakchian
Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Econometrics I Fall 2010 Seyed Mahdi Barakchian Textbook: Wooldridge, J., Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, South
Model Information Data Set. Response Variable (Events) Summe Response Variable (Trials) N Response Distribution Binomial Link Function
02:32 Donnerstag, November 03, 2016 1 Model Information Data Set WORK.EXP Response Variable (Events) Summe Response Variable (Trials) N Response Distribution inomial Link Function Logit Variance Function
Muskrat Falls Project - Exhibit 45 Page 1 of 7
Key regression equations Domestic Average Use equation for Newfoundland Power Service Territory Muskrat Falls Project - Exhibit 45 Page 1 of 7 Dependent Variable: NPAVDUSE Date: 1/18/1 Time: 15:31 Sample:
populasi 37 ipo dan relisting 6 laporan keuangan tidak lengkap 1 laba dan modal negatif 8 lengkap 22 sampel 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014,
Lampiran 1: Pemilihan sampel No Nama Emiten KODE 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 PT Akasha Wira International Tbk. ADES 2 PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk. AISA 3 PT Tri Banyan Tirta Tbk. ALTO 4 PT Wilmar Cahaya
The Influence of Accident Related Factors on Road Fatalities Considering Bali Province in Indonesia as a Case Study
The Influence of Accident Related Factors on Road Fatalities Considering Bali Province in Indonesia as a Case Study D. M. Priyantha WEDAGAMA Lecturer Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering
Regression Models Course Project, 2016
Regression Models Course Project, 2016 Venkat Batchu July 13, 2016 Executive Summary In this report, mtcars data set is explored/analyzed for relationship between outcome variable mpg (miles for gallon)
Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Final Exam
Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Final Exam List of Figures in this document by page: List of Figures 1 Raisins data.............................. 2 2 Boxplot of raisin data........................
Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests. February 2017 Updated November 2017
Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests February 2017 Updated November 2017 2017 NWEA. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be modified or further distributed without
Stat 401 B Lecture 31
Model Selection Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables Indicator variables for types of car Sports Car, SUV, Wagon, Minivan 1 Explanatory Variables Engine size (liters) Cylinders (number)
5. CONSTRUCTION OF THE WEIGHT-FOR-LENGTH AND WEIGHT-FOR- HEIGHT STANDARDS
5. CONSTRUCTION OF THE WEIGHT-FOR-LENGTH AND WEIGHT-FOR- HEIGHT STANDARDS 5.1 Indicator-specific methodology The construction of the weight-for-length (45 to 110 cm) and weight-for-height (65 to 120 cm)
Road Surface characteristics and traffic accident rates on New Zealand s state highway network
Road Surface characteristics and traffic accident rates on New Zealand s state highway network Robert Davies Statistics Research Associates http://www.statsresearch.co.nz Joint work with Marian Loader,
Lecture 2. Review of Linear Regression I Statistics Statistical Methods II. Presented January 9, 2018
Review of Linear Regression I Statistics 211 - Statistical Methods II Presented January 9, 2018 Estimation of The OLS under normality the OLS Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California,
Reliability and Validity of Seat Interface Pressure to Quantify Seating Comfort in Motorcycles
Reliability and Validity of Seat Interface Pressure to Quantify Seating Comfort in Motorcycles Sai Praveen Velagapudi a,b, Ray G. G b a Research & Development, TVS Motor Company, INDIA; b Industrial Design
female male help("predict") yhat age
30 40 50 60 70 female male 1.0 help("predict") 0.5 yhat 0.0 0.5 1.0 30 40 50 60 70 age 30 40 50 60 70 1.5 1.0 female male help("predict") 0.5 yhat 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 30 40 50 60 70 age 2 Wald Statistics Response:
namibia UniVERSITY OF SCIEnCE AnD TECHnOLOGY FACULTY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS MARKS: 100
namibia UniVERSITY OF SCIEnCE AnD TECHnOLOGY FACULTY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS QUALIFICATION: BACHELOR OF ECONOMICS -., QUALIFICATION CODE: 7BAMS LEVEL: 7
Robust alternatives to best linear unbiased prediction of complex traits
Robust alternatives to best linear unbiased prediction of complex traits WHY BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION EASY TO EXPLAIN FLEXIBLE AMENDABLE WELL UNDERSTOOD FEASIBLE UNPRETENTIOUS NORMALITY IS IMPLICIT
Level of service model for exclusive motorcycle lane
387 Level of service model for exclusive motorcycle lane Seyed Farzin Faezi, Hussain Hamid, Sulistyo Arintono and Seyed Rasoul Davoodi Dept. of Civil Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM
Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320. Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran
Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320 Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran I. Introduction A. Overview 1. Ways to describe, summarize and display data. 2.Summary statements: Mean Standard deviation Variance