PRESERVATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE. Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Meeting Portsmouth, NH November 8-10, 2010

Transcription

1 PRESERVATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Meeting Portsmouth, NH November 8-10,

2 Pavement Management Implementation FY

3 1. Northeast Region (NER) 2. Road System 3. Pavement Condition 4. Comparisons 5. Preservation Approach 6. Projections 7. Conclusions 3

4 1. Northeast Region 4

5 NPS NER Park Units or 20% States/Territories or 26% Population 311 M 73 M or 24% Annual Visitation 285 M 54 M or 19% Economic Impact $ 11.6 B $ 1.5 B or 13% Alternate Transportation Systems or 22% Major Metropolitan areas in the Northeast Corridor 5

6 NER Transportation Assets 6

7 Road Network: Scenic, Historic and Unchanged

8 Transportation Assets 8

9 API API /FCI Transportation Assets NER Transportation Assets by Asset Category Good Fair Poor Serios Restore/Replace Roads Parking Road Bridge Road Tunnel Trails 60 Trail Bridge Trail Tunnel Transp Bldg Fuel 30 Marina Consider Removal Aviation Railroad 0 Excess FCI Source: FMSS 2/10 9

10 Total Deferred Maintenance Needs including Roads, Bridges and Multi-Modal Transportation NER $2.9 B = 18% of NPS PWR $ 3,416M IMR MWR $ 826M NER $ 2,879M $ 3,267M $ 3,220M SER NCR $ 1,654M AKR $ 357M Total Need: $15.6B 10

11 2. Road System 11

12 Paved Road and Equivalent Miles of Parking NER vs. NPS 12

13 NER Road Facts 1,204 Total Miles: 478 Paved Road Miles 397 Paved Parking Miles 329 Gravel Road Miles 88% Asphalt, 12% PCC Parking is 45% of Pavement 186 Bridges & Tunnels Longest Road is 105 Miles Historic and Non-historic Urban and Rural High, Low and Seasonal Use Increased Commuter Traffic Minimal Heavy Truck Traffic

14 NER Paved Miles by Functional Class 478 Road Miles and 379 Parking Miles Equivalent Principal miles 2 Connector - 77 miles 3 Special Purpose - 81 miles 4 Primitive - 0 miles 5 Admin 6 Restricted Access miles miles 7 Urban Parkway - 0 miles 8 City Street - 2 miles 9 Parking miles 14

15 NER Funding $15M FY10 Program Budget $12M Construction Awards Surface & Light 3R Treatments $3M or 20% Planning, Design, Contracting and Supervision 15

16 3. Pavement Condition 16

17 FHWA Collects Standard Condition Data for all NPS Parks 17

18 Collected on Cycles Parking Manually Rated Four Condition Categories 18

19 The Surface Condition Rating (SCR) and Roughness Condition Index (RCI) are combined to define the Pavement Condition Rating (PCR): 60% SCR + 40% RCI = PCR

20 NER 2009 Network Condition Excellent Condition = 95 to 100 PCR Good Condition = 85 to 94 PCR - Roads 8% or 36 Miles - Roads 42% or 193 Miles - Parking 7% - Parking 23% (NER Goal is 85 PCR or Better) Fair Condition = 61 to 84 PCR Poor Condition = 0 to 60 PCR - Roads 29% or 135 Miles - Roads 21% or 97 Miles - Parking 35% - Parking 35% 20

21 Figure 10 NER Pavement Condition Rating Breakdown Base Year 2009 NER Pavement Condition Rating

22 4. Comparisons 22

23 Servicewide Breakdown by Condition Category

24 National-NER Comparison 100% 90% % % % 50% Excellent Good Fair 40% Poor 30% 20% % 0% 2007 National 2007 NER 2009 National 2009 NER 24

25 40% Construction Design (PE) to Construction (CN) Costs 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% Northeast 11.40% 10% 6 Regions % 0%

26 Construction Supervision (CE) to Net Construction (CN) Costs 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% Northeast 6.94% 4% 2% 6 Regions 12.90% 0%

27 Project Miles as Pct. of Route Miles 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% NCRO NERO SERO MWRO IMRO PWRO AKRO 1.0% 0.0%

28 Difference in Pavement Condition Ratings (Northeast - National) Excellent +2% +1% Good +4% +26% Fair +3% -16% Poor -9% -11% 28

29 5. Preservation Approach 29

30 Approach: RIP Data Collection HPMA Modeling 100% Field Validation ROS Prioritization (Roadway Objective Score) Program Formulation Key Assumptions: Focus on Primary Roads Stay Between the White Lines Minimize Investment in Parking Lots Demolish Non Performing Assets Minimize Design and Supervision Costs Follow Established Priorities 30

31 6. Projections 31

32 Route Miles Pre and Post Pavement Management Prior to Miles Per Year - 65 PCR in thru Miles Per Year - 76 PCR in 2010 Continue Approach Through 2017 with Increase in Surface Treatments to achieve minimum 85 PCR to optimum 94 PCR 32

33 $50 Funding and Reauthorization Scenarios $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 Level PCR $10 Low PCR $5 $ ARRA + L/B 10 + ARRA + L/B Medium PCR High PCR

34 A Comparison of 4 funding levels over a 9-year analysis period PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE11 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY PLOT PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE12 PCR, Avg, NER10 01, NE13 PCR Avg Do Nothing Index Year Subset: NER_FC_

35 By 2013 Excellent and Good Categories will exceed 55% of the NER network (FC 12378) 100% 90% 80% 70% Low Funding + 4% Inflation FC % 90% 80% 70% Low Funding + 4% Inflation All Function Classes % Excellent 60% Excellent 50% 40% 30% 20% Good Fair Poor 50% 40% 30% 20% Good Fair Poor 10% 0% % 0%

36 Miles of Treatment Northeast Region -- Low Funding Scenario Treatment Breakdown by Rte-Miles Treatment Breakdown By Route Miles Preservation Light 3R Heavy 3R R Reconstruct

37 7. Conclusions 37

38 Summary Continue Pavement Management & Preservation Program Increase Condition Data Collection Cycle Preserve Investment Thru Increased Preservation Focus - High Priority Roads - Where 80% of Visitors Travel Outside the White Lines - Only as Necessary Improve Highest Priority Visitor Parking Limited Heavy 4R Construction if Funding Allows Integrate Safety Countermeasure Priorities, Congestion Mitigation Priorities and Multi Modal Priorities 38

39 Questions? 39