City of Justin Street Improvement Plan

Transcription

1 City of Justin Street Improvement Plan PREPARED BY: PK No January 2019 TX REG. ENGINEERING FIRM F TX REG. SURVEYING FIRM LS Western Place, Suite 1001 Fort Worth, Texas

2 DRAFT

3 I. Project Description and Summary The City of Justin requested that Pacheco Koch help with the development of the City of Justin Street Improvement Plan, SIP. The SIP was based on the City of Justin s Street Evaluation Report completed in September 2018 by Jacob & Martin, LLC. The Street Evaluation Report purpose was to evaluate the conditions of the existing streets and make recommendations to repair and maintain the street system. The Street Evaluation Report used a visual inspection along with a semi automated pavement distress survey completed by Dynatest North America, Inc. Using these factors, a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was established which helped determine the street condition (excellent to failure). This report was extensively relied upon to determine the order in which streets should be improved. Other factors were also used which were external to this report. These additional factors are the areas affected by the FM 156 reconstruction, areas affected by the SWIFT Water Improvement construction, and any areas that might be improved by incoming new developments. The aforementioned Street Evaluation Report is attached in the Appendix. City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 1

4 II. Funding for the Street Improvement Plan Based on the aforementioned information, areas that needed improvement were established. The next step to developing a full street improvement plan is the allowance of funding, which is discussed in the next part of this report, and programming which year/order the streets should be improved. For this report, fiscal years are used which goes from October to September of the next year. For example, fiscal year one of this report is from October 2018 to September 2019 (FY2019). As the date of this report is past October 2018, it is assumed that this plan will begin April Thus, year 1 will only be a half year (April 2019 September 2019). The limit of this SIP is April 2019 April 2023 (4 years). The projects beyond that timeframe are listed in the referenced report in no particular order. The funding for the street improvement projects is assumed to come from the half cent of sales tax passed by the City of Justin residents via referendum in November This funding has provided the sales tax for the next four years upon which would be determined via referendum again. Thus, this report does not extend beyond four years as previously mentioned. The funding for each year is assumed to be approximately $275,000. So for the Year 1 (FY 2019), funding is assumed to be $135,000 due to FY2019 being a half year. The anticipated types of projects include maintenance projects like seal coats and overlays and reconstruction which is complete failure and require complete reconstruction of the roadway. Maintenance projects tend to be cheaper; however, they are reoccurring projects so a majority of the operating (annual) budget is dedicated to these. The reconstruction projects require more capital but are not a reoccurring project rather they are completed on a more one time basis. Thus, it is anticipated that these projects will be funded via the sale of bonds. This helps plan and provide an annualized cost for these reconstruction projects removing some of the lumpiness in cost. For this plan, it is expected that the City of Justin will issue approximately $1,000,000 in bonds to be paid back at a rate of $75,000 per year. From this information, it can determined that for each year approximately $75,000 will be used for debt service for the bonds for the reconstruction projects, and $200,000 will be dedicated to maintenance projects. The maintenance projects will be constructed by City staff (filling in potholes/spot repairs) and contracted labor i.e. contractors. The maintenance City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 2

5 funding would include $35,000 for City staff projects and $165,000 for projects bid out to be completed by contractors. The figure below shows the aforementioned funding and its allocation. Funding Allocation Exhibit 1 Funding Allocation Based on $275,000 Annual Budget $75,000 $35,000 $165,000 City Staff Projects Contractor Projects Debt Service Payment for Reconstruction Projects Funding Allocation Exhibit 2 City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 3

6 III. Street Evaluation The referenced Street Evaluation Report in the Appendix, can best be summarized by the figure below. Figure: Map of Justin showing PCI Categories from Street Evaluation Report City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 4

7 This map represents and illustrates the problem areas around the City which would be yellow through black (yellow, brown, red and black). These are the areas of focus. The majority of the marginal to failed roadways are in Old Town and the Adams Addition. This is highlighted in the figure. One item to note is that the SWIFT water improvements are also in this area. So these areas should be programmed in a manner that they are not improved and then a new water main tears up the road again. In conclusion, it shows that Ridgeview, Reatta, Meadowlands and the Hardeman Subdivisions have streets in good to excellent condition. Out of those, Meadowlands has more fair and marginal pavement but is in good condition when compared to the Adams Addition and Old Town. Thus, these areas will predominantly have the most funding allocated towards them. City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 5

8 IV. Street Improvement Plan Given the budget and evaluation, an improvement plan can be formed to program projects for funding years. The projects should be completed in the funding year; however, sometimes inclement weather or other circumstances can prevent that from happening. Thus, a project that does not get completed in the funding year would be a top priority the next year (goes to the top of the list). Additionally, like any plan, this Street Improvement Plan should be evaluated on a reoccurring basis. The best plans are ones that are living documents as the City s priorities can change along with usage of roads. Development can also dictate different traffic patterns along with commercial uses, thus it is recommended that priorities are reevaluated to make sure they are still priorities. As previously mentioned Year 1 will be a half year and go from April 2019 September The budget will be $135,000 with $35,000 used towards City Staff maintenance. The remaining $100,000 will be used on the following streets shown in the table below, these streets were selected based on traffic, usage and condition. Note that reconstruction is not included in year 1 as it is assumed bonds would be sold and the debt payment would begin year 2 (Oct and beyond). The costs came from the previously referenced Street Assessment and can be found in the Appendix of this report. Table: Year 1 Street Improvement Plan On the costs that exceed the budget, it is anticipated that there may be some pricing synergies when bidding these projects out together or as previously mentioned these streets would be moved to the next year as priority if they could not be completed within this year. City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 6

9 Year 2 is when the debt service for the reconstruction projects would begin. The year 2 projects would include the beginning of the reconstruction projects (shown in the table below) and the on going maintenance projects. The year 2 table shows the maintenance projects along with the debt service payment and city staff maintenance budget. Table: Reconstruction Projects Table: Year 2 Street Improvement Plan From the tables above it can be seen that there is approximately $1,000,000 in reconstruction improvements and approximately $170,000 year 2 projects maintenance projects. These maintenance projects are the projects that are recommended to be improved via seal coat or overlay. City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 7

10 Years 3 through 4 projects are shown on the table below. The total budget for these projects would be $330,000 or $165,000 per year. The scheduled work exceeds the budget but it does allow for prices to come in under the costs that are provided in the Street Assessment Report. It would also be a good starting point for the following years if the desire of the citizens would be to continue the street improvement program. Table: Years 3 4 Street Improvement Plan The map included in the appendix shows all of the proposed improvement projects for the City. This helps visually see the projects color coded by improvement year or reconstruction project which could go across years. It also highlights Boss Range Road, which is anticipated to be improved with Denton County participation. They have a program where the City provides the supplies and the County utilizes its own crews to repair roads. Boss Range Road seemed the most suitable for this type of project; however, areas in Old Town would be great as well, it is not jointly maintained like Boss Range (along the whole road itself). In conclusion, it is good to update the Street Improvement Plan on an annual basis as a planning effort to make sure it takes into account the latest information. Also, continued maintenance helps to keep streets in good condition and slows down the again process. If no maintenance is done, then the road can go from good or fair to poor or failed rather quickly and reconstruction would have to be done instead of the more cost effective maintenance remedies. City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 8

11 Appendix City of Justin Street Improvement Plan Page 9

12 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN LEGEND

13 STREET EVALUATION REPORT For CITY OF JUSTIN, TEXAS SEPTEMBER 2018 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Mayor David Wilson Mayor Pro Tem Alan Woodall Brad Rieger Lynn Crites Charlotte Moore John Mounce City Manager Cori Reaume City Secretary Brittany Andrews Public Works Director Steve Martin Prepared By: Firm No Abilene - Weatherford, Texas

14 STREET EVALUATION REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND STREET SYSTEM INVENTORY 1 II. DYNATEST STREET SYSTEM ANALYSIS 2 III. 5-YEAR AND 10-YEAR STREET PLAN 3 IV. STREET IMPROVEMENT FUNDING OPTIONS 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: STREET SEGMENT ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B: DYNATEST PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) SURVEY

15 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND STREET SYSTEM INVENTORY The City of Justin contracted Jacob & Martin, LLC to perform an evaluation of the existing local street system throughout the City. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine the conditions of the streets and make recommendations to repair and maintain the street system. Data has been collected from site visits, City records and meetings with City staff. The following report contains the results of the evaluation. The City of Justin is located approximately 25 miles north of Downtown Fort Worth in Denton County. There are two Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) roadways that run through the City which include Farm-To-Market (FM) Road 156 and FM 407. FM 156 is a major north and south roadway that runs through the main section of the City with multiple local roads on the west side. FM 407 is a major east and west roadway that also runs through the main section of the City with multiple local roads on the north and south sides. There is a BNSF rail line the runs north and south along the east side of FM 156, thus limiting access to the east side of FM 156. The City has a total of approximately 25 miles of local streets within the city limits. Approximately 43% of the streets consist of an asphalt paved surface over a base material and 55% consist of a concrete paved surface over a stabilized base material. The remaining 2% of the streets are unpaved or gravel roadways. Based on visual inspections, a majority of the asphalt pavements within the City appeared to be in poor, very poor and failed conditions. The asphalt pavements have varying amount of stress throughout with longitudinal and horizontal cracking and show signs of significant amounts of pattern/alligator cracking throughout the system. There are multiple areas of roadway base failures as seen through the stress failures, rutting, potholes, and roadway heave in various locations. Asphalt shoving at intersections is occurring due to the stopping and turn movements of vehicles. Based on visual inspections, a majority of the concrete pavements within the City are in good condition with some spalled joints, punchouts, corner cracks in slabs, and micro-cracking at various locations. There are a few locations that indicate complete pavement failure where rebar is exposed. The unpaved or gravel roadways have various locations of potholes throughout. Using visual inspection and depending on the type of repairs needed, each street segment throughout the City has been classified as reconstruction, seal coat, or overlay. Appendix A shows an itemized list of each street segment which includes the surface type, classification, notes, and costs associated for repairs. Below is a description of the different classifications used for the street segments. Classification Reconstruction Description Streets where a high level of failure has occurred. A program needs to be developed to upgrade the streets. This includes reconstruction of existing asphalt streets to improve their condition, and safety, and thus also improving the longevity. This 1

16 would occur on the city streets with very high level of deterioration, extreme failures due to major longitudinal, transverse, pattern/alligator cracking, potholes, and base failures which will require full reconstruction. This also includes places where there are heaves in the curb and gutters. Overlay Seal Coat Streets with a medium level of deterioration, failures due to longitudinal, transverse, pattern/alligator cracking, potholes, and base failures that will require some reconstruction of the failed areas with an asphalt overlay. The overlay will include the repair of the roadways with deterioration of edge ravel. Asphalt streets with a lower level of deterioration due to longitudinal, transverse, pattern/alligator cracking and potholes, that will require some minor reconstruction of the failed areas with a seal coat of the roadway. This will help to improve the roadway driving surface for safety and longevity. Repairs needed on concrete pavement at spalled joints, punchouts, failed spots; then place a seal coat over the pavement to increase the longevity of the pavement. This will also improve the safety of the roadway. Also, for concrete pavement with light or micro-cracking, repair spall joints or punch outs in the pavement and then place a seal coat over the roadway. II. PAVEMENT CONDITIONS INDEX (PCI) SURVEY Jacob & Martin contracted with Dynatest North America, Inc. (Dynatest) to perform a semi-automated pavement distress survey on the roadway system for the City of Justin. A copy of the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey completed by Dynatest is enclosed within this Report as Appendix B. As mentioned in the survey, the primary objective for the survey was to determine the state of the street s pavement condition in the form of a PCI, so the City may more objectively assess to the condition of its roadway pavement, better optimize and prioritize the expenditure of existing Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) funding, and more effectively identify and justify its future roadway pavement M&R funding needs. The PCI condition assessment criteria used to analyze the pavement network completed by Dynatest were rated as excellent, good, fair, marginal, poor, very poor, and failed. PCI values range from 0 to 100 with 0-30 being failed conditions, being very poor conditions, being poor conditions, being marginal, being fair conditions, being good conditions, and being excellent conditions. The overall pavement condition distributions were rated as 31% excellent, 17% good, 8% fair, 8% marginal, 9% poor, 11% very poor, and 16% failed. Existing pavement conditions and field observations indicated that the overall City s pavements were found to be in marginal condition with an overall average PCI value of

17 Separating the type of surface, the concrete pavement conditions were rated as 54% excellent, 29% good, 13% fair, and 4% marginal. The concrete pavements have an average PCI value of 88.9 which can be considered good condition. The asphalt pavement conditions were rated as 1% good, 2% fair, 15% marginal, 21% poor, 26% very poor, and 37% failed. The asphalt pavements have an overall PCI value of 36.4 which can be considered very poor condition. There is a street map exhibit included at the end of the PCI Survey which shows each street segment highlighted in a color based on its PCI Category rating. The Survey also includes some photos of the existing pavement conditions. Per the Survey, the observed pavement distresses were load related which consisted of approximately 60% of the overall distresses. The load related distresses on the asphalt pavement included rutting and alligator cracking. The loaded related distresses on the concrete pavement included corner breaks and divided slabs. Climate/durability related to approximately 36% of the observed distresses. The climate/durability related distresses on the asphalt pavement included longitudinal, transverse and block cracking. The climate/durability related distresses on the concrete pavement included joint and corner spalling. Other distress of approximately 4% was the cause of concrete pavement joint faulting, scaling and patching. Most the City s concrete pavements, which account for 55% of the total City s pavement inventory, exhibited minimal distress and appear to be performing well. The City s asphalt pavements, which account for less than 43% of the total City s pavement inventory, exhibited more significant distress and several are in need of major M&R, such as resurfacing or reconstruction. III. 5-YEAR AND 10-YEAR STREET PLAN The classifications listed above in Section I are described to repair and maintain an adequate street system. Overlays and seal coats are normally considered annual routine maintenance items for some Cities. When a City falls behind in this area, it may take a maximum effort to improve the street system so that it can provide assistance in seal coating and overlaying City streets. The City should also continue to request that TxDOT have a high level of maintenance to the highway system through town. The priorities assigned to the improvement of the street systems should ultimately be decided by the citizens of Justin in their willingness to pay the cost through increased taxes. City personnel should evaluate traffic demand to prepare a list of priorities for needed repairs. The coordination of utility line improvements should also be made to avoid destruction of new pavement. In order to have a safe and drivable street system that can accommodate the City s vehicular demands, the City should consider following the objectives listed below: Inspect road surfaces regularly and repair when necessary 3

18 Begin to develop yearly resurfacing and reconstruction programs to maintain existing streets Uphold City ordinances concerning new developments to meet city street standard requirements At the bottom of the table in Appendix A, a total estimated cost has been provided for each street repair classification including reconstruction, overlay, and seal coat which total approximately $4,700,000, $980,000, and $2,260,000, respectively. These amounts cover all the street segments throughout the City. The total reconstruction cost can be used as a base line to implement a capital improvement program for the City s street system. Also, the City may consider performing half of the reconstructions within a 5- year plan and the other half within a 10-year plan. An inflation rate of 2%-3% per year should also be considered. In order to maintain the street system, it is highly recommended for the City to begin a yearly overlay and seal coat maintenance program on a 5-year rotational cycle or 10-year rotational cycle. Based on the total costs for overlay and seal coat shown in Appendix A, the City would need to budget approximately $650,000 per year on a 5-year rotational program or $325,000 per year on a 10-year rotational cycle. An inflation rate of 2%-3% per year should also be considered. Grass and weed invasion of the pavement surfaces or encroachment at the edge of the pavement will cause poor surface drainage and pavement cracking. Vegetation should be controlled and removed as part of annual routine maintenance. If left uncontrolled, this vegetation can degenerate the effectiveness of pavement and cause severe failure. IV. STREET IMPROVEMENTS FUNDING OPTIONS The City of Justin currently has local city taxes and system revenues in place that may help support the cost to maintain the current street system. With the additional cost of reconstruction of roads within the City and the replacing of aging infrastructure, additional capital improvement fees should be periodically evaluated as a means for potential funds in improvements to these projects. There are other means as well, that the City can pursue to help finance the roadway and utility replacement projects. The City should pursue state and federal funding to help supplement local bonds for street reconstruction and utility replacement. Rural Development, a division of USDA, may fund a street reconstruction project if it is directly related to a utility replacement project. Rural Development funding for utilities may be in the form of loan or grant, or a combination; however, street improvements are only funded through loans. The Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) will fund streets on occasion if the entity can make a strong case for the need for the funding. TDA funding is in the form of Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), and these funds have recently been 4

19 increased to approximately $500,000 per project. These funds become available on a two-year cycle. Street reconstruction projects are generally funded through tax supported bonds. It is recommended that the City begin planning for the issuance of locally supported bonds as well as investigating state, county and local funding to supplement them. As mentioned, county and state in-kind participation may offset some cost as well. 5

20 APPENDIX A STREET SEGMENT ASSESSMENT

21 City of Justin, Texas Street Segments Assessment September 2018 Street From To Pavement Reconstruct Overlay Seal Coat Thoroughfare Surface Road-Classification Notes Cost Cost Cost Category Type Width (LF) Length (LF) ($) ($) ($) Approx..2 miles from Creek Hill Dr on s. side lanes, 3'X2' spawled spot in center 12th St. Ridgetop Dr. Creek Hill Way Local Conc Repair spawled spot lane. $ 585 $ - $ 53,122 12th St. Creek Hill Way FM 156 Local Conc Repair spawled joint and others Corner spawled joint s. side aprox. 415' from Creek Hill Dr. - spawled joint s. side corner 69'. $ 780 $ - $ 70,829 13th St. Canyon Dr. End Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Allen Dr. Windmill Dr. S. College St. Local ACP Repair Joint and Overlay 3'x17' at joint w/conc. Pavement & 5'x17' severe pattern 3/4 throughout down center. 150' conc and 264' ACP. $ 3,211 $ 52,492 $ - Allen Dr. S. College St. S. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Sealcoat Severe pattern cracking at valley gutter at S. College St. $ 944 $ - $ 8,462 Allen Dr. S. Jackson Ave. S. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Sealcoat Seepage about halfway between streets. $ 944 $ - $ 22,340 Atchison Ave. E. 5th St. E. 4th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Road is in failure and needs to be reconstructed. $ 42,524 $ - $ - Barrett Dr. S. Jackson Ave. S. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Reconstruct failures and Sealcoat Down center there are signs of failures of approx. 200' x 6' $ 17,333 $ - $ 11,947 Barrett Dr. S. Snyder Ave. S. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Approximately 50% of sanitary sewer line is failing - depression, also some service connection lines. $ 69,333 $ - $ - Barrett Dr. S. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Repair failure & Sealcoat Failure spot at corner on north side of Barrett at S. Sealy Ave. $ 4,622 $ - $ 15,132 Bishop Dr. Mae Dr. S. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruct/Overlay Rutting starting approximately 100'. Repair rutting and then overlay $ 23,111 $ 24,889 $ - Repair spalling and cracks 20' off S. Bluebonnet Cir. Corner cracks & spalling both lanes in center, spalling in Bluebonnet Cir. S. Bluebonnet Cir. N. Bluebonnet Cir. Local Conc in pavement front of resident 101. $ 563 $ - $ 17,084 Blue Jay Ln Daisey Ln. Hummingbird Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 17,084 Predominately base with several large pot holes, what asphalt there is is failing, Reconstruction Boot Alley W. 2nd St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP/G needs total reconstruction. $ 69,117 $ - $ - Predominately base with several large pot holes, what asphalt there is is failing, Reconstruction Boot Alley W. 3rd St. W. 4th St. Local ACP/G needs total reconstruction. $ 69,117 $ - $ - Predominately base with several large pot holes, what asphalt there is is failing, Reconstruction Boot Alley W. 4th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP/G needs total reconstruction. $ 69,117 $ - $ - Boss Range Road W. 1st St. Pine Crest St. Local ACP Reconstruction Several locations with rutting, pattern and base failure $ 91,520 $ - $ - Boss Range Road Pine Crest St. Ovaletta Dr. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting and base failure with ACP missing $ 183,040 $ - $ - Boss Range Road Ovaletta Dr. N. of Bridge Local ACP Reconstruct and Overlay S. bound lane patterning 5-6' wide and 528' in length. $ 45,760 $ 24,640 $ - Boss Range Road Bridge John Wiley Road Local ACP Reconstruct and Overlay John Willey Rd. to several hunderd feet past Range Rd. rutting along outside lane. $ 52,000 $ 0 $ - Canyon Dr. Valley Dr. 13th St. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 4,435 Canyon Dr. 13th St. Hillside Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 35,482 Cedar Crest Dr. Ovaletta Dr. Hardeman Blvd. Local Conc Seal Coat Microsurface craking $ - $ - $ 36,796 Cedar Crest Dr. Hardeman Blvd. Hardeman Blvd. Local Conc Repair failure Punchout failure at 346 Cedar Crest Dr., At drainage channel crossing low pt in pavement potentially ponds water. $ 404 $ - $ 36,796 Chinos Trail Goodnight Trail Ridge Dr. Local Conc Repair spawled joint Light Microcracking spalling at joint at end of radius return off Goodnight Trail $ 311 $ - $ 27,597 Chisholm Trail Loving Trail Lakeway Lane Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 36,796 Colorado Ave. E. 5th St. E. 6th St. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 Colorado Ave. E. 6th St. E. 7th St. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 Colorado Ave. E. 7th St. End Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 Creek Hill Way 12th St. N. Hardeman Cir Local ACP Repair joint failure Stress and failure at joint with concrete pavement $ 758 $ - $ 13,798 Creek Hill Way N.Hardeman Circle S. Hardeman Circle Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 10,780 $ - Creek Hill Way S. Hardeman Circle W. 8th St. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 1,960 Creek Hill Way W 8th St. W 7th St. Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 21,560 $ - At 122 Lt ln corner break in slab, In front of 123 rt ln spalling, and joint in knuckle Repair spawled areas. Daisey Ln. Sage Dr. Blue Jay Ln Local Conc with Sage rt ln spalling $ 94 $ - $ 34,167 spalling just off Bluejay Ln at joint across the road, 3 spots 1'x1' and 1'x2'. At Repair spawled joint and Meadowview corner punchout in center of rdwy. In front of resident 109 core hole punchout. Daisey Ln. Blue Jay Ln. Meadowview Dr. Local Conc not filled. $ 94 $ - $ 17,084 Dorothy S. Denton Ave. S. College St. Local ACP Sealcoat Seepage about halfway pt between streets around sanitary sewer manhole rim. $ - $ - $ 10,752 Downe Rd. Gulf Ave. End Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 23,333 $ - Downe Rd. Gulf Ave. Trail Creek Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 45,173 $ - Surface Type: Conc=concrete, ACP=asphalt, SC=seal coat, G=gravel, D=dirt, U=unimproved Roadway maintained by others are not included

22 City of Justin, Texas Street Segments Assessment September 2018 Street From To Pavement Reconstruct Overlay Seal Coat Thoroughfare Surface Road-Classification Notes Cost Cost Cost Category Type Width (LF) Length (LF) ($) ($) ($) E. 4th St. Atchison Ave. Gulf Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Road is in complete failure and needs to be reconstructed. $ 60,089 $ - $ - E. 4th St. Gulf Ave. Topeka Ave. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 9,159 E. 4th St. Topeka Ave. RR Crossing Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 9,159 E. 6th St. Colorado Ave. Topeka Ave. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 E. 6th St. Topeka Ave. Gulf Ave. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 8,587 E. 7th St. Colorado Ave. Topeka Ave. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 9,159 E. 7th St. Topeka Ave. Gulf Ave. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 Repair spawled joints, Flower Ct. S. Bluebonnet Cir. End Local Conc punchouts and slab failures. spalling on joints, punchout failure rt ln at entry of Ct., corner cracks and failures in various slabs. $ 1,127 $ - $ 4,271 Goodnight Trail Loving Trail Laredo Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 19,513 Goodnight Trail Laredo Lakeway Lane Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 19,513 Goodnight Trail Lakeway Lane Sierra Trail Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,467 Goodnight Trail Sierra Trail Chinos Trail Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 8,885 Goodnight Trail Chinos Trail Santa Fe Trail Local Conc Repair punchpout Punch out at Santa Fe approx. about 1' x 1' $ 404 $ - $ 8,432 Goodnight Trail Santa Fe Trail Reatta Dr. Local Conc Repair spawled area Joint at end of radius off Reatta spawled $ 404 $ - $ 8,781 Gulf Ave. E. 4th St. Downe Rd. Local G Reconstruction Base road This is typicallly a haul road for soil/mulch material company $ 168,603 $ - $ - Gulf Ave. End E. 7th St. Local G Reconstruction Base road with several pot holes. $ 53,156 $ - $ - Gulf Ave. E. 7th St. E. 6th St. Local G Reconstruction Base road with several pot holes. $ 53,156 $ - $ - Gulf Ave. E. 6th St. E. 5th St. Local G Reconstruction Base road with several pot holes. $ 53,156 $ - $ - Gulf Ave. E. 5th St. E. 4th St. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 916 Hardeman Blvd. End Cedar Crest Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 8,711 Hardeman Blvd. Cedar Crest Dr. Hilltop Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 14,187 Hardeman Blvd. Hilltop Dr. Windmill Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 14,187 Hardeman Blvd. Windmill Dr. Cedar Crest Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 18,916 Hardeman Blvd. Cedar Crest Dr. Orchid Dr. Local Conc Repair spawl Approx. 200' west of FM 156 spawl spot 1/2' X 4". Repair spawl spot $ 274 $ - $ 24,969 Hardeman Blvd. Orchid Dr. FM 156 Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 24,969 Hillside Cir. Hillside Dr. End Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Hillside Dr. End Hillside Cir. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Hillside Dr. Hilside Cir. Canyon Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Hillside Dr. Canyon Dr. Ridgetop Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Hillside Dr. Ridgetop Dr. Scenic Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Hillside Dr. Scenic Dr. Summit Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Hillside Dr. Summit Dr. Emd Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 4,435 Hilltop Dr. Ovaletta Dr. Pine Crest Dr. Local Conc Repair failure Spawled joint with Ovaletta Dr. $ 404 $ - $ 18,398 Hilltop Dr. Pine Crest Dr. Hardeman Blvd. Local Conc Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 18,398 Honeysuckle Dr. Meadowview Dr. Hummingbird Ln. Local Conc Repair spalling In pavement spalling at joint in front of driveway at resident 121. $ 376 $ - $ 25,626 Honeysuckle Dr. Hummingbird Ln. Sage Dr. Local Conc Repair ACP patch and other failures Patches of ACP in center of road, in front of resident 135 failure spot, corner crack and failures in front of resident 136. $ 1,127 $ - $ 34,167 Hummingbird Ln. Honeysuckle Dr. Blue Jay Ln. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 8,542 Hummingbird Ln. Blue Jay Ln. Sage Dr. Local Conc Repair spalling Spalling in rt. Lane off Sage Dr. $ 563 $ - $ 25,626 Repair several spallings in Spalling in front of resident 112, Off Meadview Dr. at end of radii spalling at joint in Indian Paint Dr. Sage Dr. Meadowview Dr. Local Conc pavement rt. ln. Approx. 0.1 mi. off Sage Dr. dip in roadway. $ 1,083 $ - $ 49,280 John Wiley Rd. City Limits Laredo Local Conc Repair spawled area Light Microcracking Spawl point at joint about 500' from Boss Range Rd. (Repair spawled joint) $ 1,011 $ - $ 31,578 John Wiley Rd. Laredo Sierra Trail Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 35,498 John Wiley Rd. Sierra Trail Reatta Dr. Local Conc Repair spawled area Light Microcracking Cracked and Spawled joint, punch out/deep spawl about.2 mile from FM 156. Repair crack, spawled joint and punchout. $ 758 $ - $ 33,320 John Wiley Rd. Reatta Dr. FM 156 Local Conc Repair spawled area Micocracking Approximately.5 miles from FM 156 spawled hole in Rt. Lane 1'x1'. Repair spawled hole. $ 404 $ - $ 64,288 Lakeway Ln. Goodnight Trail Chisholm Trail Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 8,803 Lakeway Ln. Chisholm Trail Ridge Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 17,035 Lakeway Ln. Ridge Dr. Silver Mine Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,475 Lakeway Ln. Silver Mine Dr. Lone Star Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 8,568 Surface Type: Conc=concrete, ACP=asphalt, SC=seal coat, G=gravel, D=dirt, U=unimproved Roadway maintained by others are not included

23 City of Justin, Texas Street Segments Assessment September 2018 Street From To Pavement Reconstruct Overlay Seal Coat Thoroughfare Surface Road-Classification Notes Cost Cost Cost Category Type Width (LF) Length (LF) ($) ($) ($) Lakeway Ln. Lone Star Dr. End Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 4,166 Laredo Trail John Wiley Rd Goodnight Trail Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 11,499 Leuty Ave. W. 7th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting on east side street appox. 200' $ 35,556 $ - $ - Leuty Ave. W. 5th St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Severe pattern cracking especially down center of road. $ 146,667 $ - $ - Reconstruct failed Significant failure at conc. Pavement joint, 1st manhole cover off grade, at backside pavement joint and other of Homeland Bakery failure in corner of slab on west side, center of street across Leuty Ave. W. 5th St. W. 1st St. Local Conc pavement failures from car wash failure of approx. 3' x 3' with rebar showing. $ 6,333 $ - $ - Lone Star Dr. Lakeway Lane Reatta Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 27,597 Loving Trail End Chisholm Trail Local Conc $ - $ - $ 4,356 Loving Trail Chisholm Trail Goodnight Trail Local Conc Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,711 Mae St. S. Denton Ave. Bishop Dr. Local ACP Reconstruction Approximately 350' & 200 ' of failure along water line on both sides of roadway. $ 62,222 $ - $ - Mae St. Bishop Dr. S. College St. Local ACP Reconstruction Approximately 250' of failure where waterline is located. Beginning of failure from Bishop Dr. to manhole 245' +/-. $ 46,933 $ - $ - Meadowview Dr. FM 407 Indian Paint Dr. Local Conc Seal center joint Wider center joint between in bound lanes has vegetation growth in joint. $ - $ - $ 261 Meadowview Dr. Indian Paint Dr. N. Bluebonnet Cir. Local Conc $ 4,443 Punchout Lt. lane approx. 20' off N. Bluebonnet Cir., ACP patch needs to be Repair punchout and replaced, spalling at joint with N. Bluebonnet Cir. Depression in front of resident spawled area Meadowview Dr. N. Bluebonnet Cir. Honeysuckle Dr. Local Conc in rt. Lane appears to be base failure. $ 2,600 $ - $ 4,928 Rt. Lane at Honeysuckle Dr. to 20' into intersection spalling with vegetation, spalling Repair spawled areas. along joints of slabs throughout, slab settlement between rt slab and middle near Meadowview Dr. Honeysuckle Dr. Daisey Ln. Local Conc Honeysuckle Dr. $ 2,528 $ - $ 11,499 Meadowview Dr. Daisey Ln. End Local Conc $ - $ - $ 6,899 N. Bluebonnet Cir. Bluebonnet Cir. Meadowview Dr. Local Conc Repair failures in pavement Corner slab breaks and failures in front of residents 105 and 102, slab failure approx. 120' off Meadowview Dr. rt. Ln. $ 751 $ - $ 8,542 N. College Ave. W. 7th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure along road $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. College Ave. W. 5th St. W. 4th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure along road and at W 5th St. water valve not to grade $ 34,133 $ - $ - N. College Ave. W. 4th St. W 3rd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure along road $ 68,640 $ - $ - N. College Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure along road $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. College Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure along road $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Denton Ave. W. 7th St. W. 6th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Start of rutting at W. 6th St. section of paving cut out and hole in base $ 25,600 $ - $ - N. Denton Ave. W. 6th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting and base failure $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Denton Ave. W. 5th St. W. 4th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting with possible failure along utilities $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Denton Ave. W. 4th St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along east side of street $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Denton Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along west side of street $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Denton Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Several locations with depressions in n. bound lane along sewer line align $ 33,280 $ - $ - Approx..2 miles of severe longitudinal cracking with potential failure east side, Reconstrution & Overlay N. Hardeman Circle Creek Hill Way S. Hardeman Circle Local ACP approx. 200' X 10' $ 123,200 $ 43,120 $ - N. Harmonson Ave. W. 7th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Reconstruct/Overlay Reconstruct 10' west edge where patterned, then overlay $ 3,178 $ 21,902 $ - N. Harmonson Ave. W. 5th St. W. 4th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Start of roadway depression $ 40,676 $ - $ - N. Harmonson Ave. W. 4th St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Depressions throughout street $ 40,676 $ - $ - N. Harmonson Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Depressions at sewer line crossings $ 40,676 $ - $ - N. Harmonson Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Seal Coat Light patterning stress $ - $ - $ 7,009 N. Jackson Ave. W. 8th St. W. 7th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting aling sewer line utility $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Jackson Ave. W. 7th St. W. 6th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting at various locations along street $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Jackson Ave. W. 6th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Couple of failure locations and start of rutting off W. 5th St. $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Jackson Ave. W. 5th St. W. 4th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting at various locations along street $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Jackson Ave. W. 4th St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting both sides of street $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Jackson Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Jackson Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Failure at intersection with W. 1st St. $ 33,280 $ - $ - N. Sealy Ave. W. 1st St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Failure at W 1st St. 5'x2' & 10'x4' west side, Pot hole approx. halfway up street 5'x4' east side. $ 49,867 $ - $ - N. Sealy Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Edge ravel down to base in some areas. $ 49,867 $ - $ - N. Sealy Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 4th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Severe patterning at W. 3rd St. $ 64,827 $ - $ - N. Sealy Ave. W. 4th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure due to severe patterning $ 64,827 $ - $ - N. Sealy Ave. W. 5th St. W. 6th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure due to severe patterning $ 38,133 $ - $ - Surface Type: Conc=concrete, ACP=asphalt, SC=seal coat, G=gravel, D=dirt, U=unimproved Roadway maintained by others are not included

24 City of Justin, Texas Street Segments Assessment September 2018 Street From To Pavement Reconstruct Overlay Seal Coat Thoroughfare Surface Road-Classification Notes Cost Cost Cost Category Type Width (LF) Length (LF) ($) ($) ($) N. Sealy Ave. W. 6th St. W. 7th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure due to severe patterning $ 34,320 $ - $ - N. Sealy Ave. W. 7th.St. W. 8th St. Local ACP Reconstruction Base failure due to severe patterning $ 26,400 $ - $ - N. Snyder Ave. W. 8th St. W. 7th St. Local ACP Overlay Some edge ravel along roadway $ - $ 25,667 $ - N. Snyder Ave. W. 7th.St. W. 6th St. Local ACP Overlay Some edge ravel along roadway $ - $ 25,667 $ - N. Snyder Ave. W. 6th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Repair Failure and Overlay Failure 2'x3' approx. about 100' south of W. 6th St. $ 433 $ 23,100 $ - N. Snyder Ave. W. 5th St. W. 4th St. Local ACP Patterning & failure on west edge at sanitary sewer manhole. Failure at intersection Repair Failure and Overlay of W. 4th St., push & shove of ACP on trench repair. $ 2,889 $ 21,778 $ - N. Snyder Ave. W. 4th St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Severe repair & patches depressed & failing along this stretch. $ 43,333 $ - $ - N. Snyder Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Repair depressed area at water valve and Seal Coat Depression at water valve. $ 556 $ - $ 7,467 N. Snyder Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Sealcoat $ - $ - $ 7,467 Northwest St. Pine Crest Dr. Ovaletta Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 10,453 Orchid Dr. Hardeman Blvd. End Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 8,711 Ovaletta Dr. End Northwest St. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 18,398 Ovaletta Dr. Northwest St. Windmill Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 36,796 At intersection with Windmill Dr. spawled joint with 3-1' to 2' x 6' failures. Repair Ovaletta Dr. Windmill Dr. Pine Crest Dr. Local Conc Repair spawled Jt. joint $ 780 $ - $ 6,048 Ovaletta Dr. Pine Crest Dr. Hilltop Dr. Local Conc Repair failed Jt. Micro cracking. Failure at joint on centerline at Hilltop Dr. appears to possibly be subgrade. Repair failure spot. $ 404 $ - $ 9,199 Ovaletta Dr. Hilltop Dr. Credar Crest Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Surface cracking $ - $ - $ 9,199 Ovaletta Dr. Cedar Crest Dr. Boss Range Rd. Local Conc Repair spawled Jt. All transverse cracks but one are sealed. Intersection at Cedar Crest Dr. spawled joint w/punchout at off roadway south panel - 2'x4'. Repair punchout $ 404 $ - $ 36,796 Pafford Ave. W. 7th St. W. 5th St. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 7,964 Depression around water valve at W 3rd St., serveral locations of depressions in n. Reconstruction Pafford Ave. W. 5th St. W. 3rd St. Local ACP bound lane along sewer line alignment. $ 83,893 $ - $ - Pafford Ave. W. 3rd St. W. 2nd St. Local ACP Reconstruction Start of depression at sewer line $ 40,676 $ - $ - Pafford Ave. W. 2nd St. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Road depressed at points for service of water or sewer. $ 40,676 $ - $ - Pine Crest Dr. City Limits Forest Ln. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 6,795 Pine Crest Dr. Forest Ln. Northwest St. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 18,398 Pine Crest Dr. Northwest St. Ovaletta Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 27,457 Pine Crest Dr. Ovaletta Dr. Hilltop Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Micro cracking $ - $ - $ 18,398 Reatta Dr. John Wiley Rd Goodnight Trail Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 7,404 Reatta Dr. Goodnight Trail Ridge Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 34,104 Reatta Dr. Ridge Dr. Silver Mine Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 11,412 Reatta Dr. Silver Mine Dr. Lone Star Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 11,891 Reatta Dr. Lone Star Dr. End Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 4,530 Ridge Dr. Lakeway Lane Sierra Trail Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 10,628 Ridge Dr. Sierra Trail Chinos Trail Local Conc Repair Spawled joint West of Chinos Trail spawled joint. East of Chinos Trail spawled joint. $ 389 $ - $ 10,889 Ridge Dr. Chinos Trail Santa Fe Trail Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,708 Ridge Dr. Santa Fe Trail Reatta Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 22,997 Ridgetop Dr. Hillside Dr. Valley Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 34,167 Repair spawled joint and End of curb approx. 120' sb lane joint has severe spalling. At turn in to subdivision, Ridgetop Dr. Valley Dr. 12th St. Local Conc punchout failure at joint. Punchout on each side of curve. $ 578 $ - $ 8,542 Sage Dr. FM 407 Indian Paint Dr. Local Conc Repair patchand spawls, etc. Patch at Indian Paint 2'x23' long cracks, spawled and settled $ 347 $ - $ 7,467 Sage Dr. Indian Paint Dr. Honeysuckle Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 7,467 Repair failed areas. Approx. 130' from Indian Paint 5'x3' failure right lane in center, 22' off Honeysuckle Sage Dr. Honeysuckle Dr. Hummingbird Ln. Local Conc left lane crack corner on 2 panels and spawl around patch. At 101 4'x1' spawl spot. $ 188 $ - $ 17,084 Sage Dr. Hummingbird Ln. Daisey Ln. Local Conc Repair corner break Corner break at intersection of left lane with Daisey on outside $ 939 $ - $ 8,542 spalling at joint with Flower Ct., Inlet face broken & steel showing both sides, rt ln Repair spawled joint and near Flower Ct. 4'x4' spawl, 60' from Flower Ct. corner crack in slab & vegetative front of inlet S. Bluebonnet Cir. Meadowview Dr. Flower Ct. Local Conc growth. $ 94 $ - $ 8,542 Surface Type: Conc=concrete, ACP=asphalt, SC=seal coat, G=gravel, D=dirt, U=unimproved Roadway maintained by others are not included

25 City of Justin, Texas Street Segments Assessment September 2018 Street From To Thoroughfare Category Surface Type Pavement Width (LF) Length (LF) Road-Classification Repair several failure spots. Notes Reconstruct Cost ($) Overlay Cost ($) Seal Coat Cost ($) Multiple spawls around repair in left lane, failure at joint with S. Bluebonnt Cir. And change in direction, steel showing in several cracks, spawls in conc in knuckle at Bluebonnet and a punchout. spalling at center joint & corner with failures in both lanes. $ 751 $ - $ 17,084 S. Bluebonnet Cir. Flower Ct. Bluebonnet Cir. Local Conc Repair failure at Valley S. College St. Allen Dr. Mae Dr. Local ACP gutter & Sealcoat Pattern at valley gutter at Allen in several spots. $ 23,111 $ - $ 10,553 Repair depressed areas S. College St. Mae Dr. S. Denton Ave. Local ACP and Overlay Depressions at a couple of sanitary sewer line service connections. $ 4,444 $ 30,489 $ - Repair depressed areas S. College St. S. Denton Ave. Dorothy Local ACP and Overlay Approximately 30' of depressed area on N. side, patterned and holding water. $ 5,333 $ 94,827 $ - S. College St. Dorothy W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Failure around sanitary sewer rim at intersection with Dorothy. $ 53,333 $ - $ - S. Denton Ave. W. 1st St. Dorothy Local ACP Sealcoat Sanitary sewer approximately 200' off W. 1st St. - failure in conc. apron. $ - $ - $ 17,920 S. Denton Ave. Dorothy S. College St. Local ACP Sealcoat $ - $ - $ 31,460 Approx..2 mi from Creek Hill Dr. n. side of street approx. failure size 225'X15', 2' Reconstrution & Overlay edge failure from driveway at resident 510 to 520, and 2' to 13' failure from S. Hardeman Circle N. Hardeman Circle Creek Hill Way Local ACP driveway resident 510 to 610, about 40' pass address 610. $ 41,708 $ 150,022 $ - S. Jackson Ave. Allen Dr. Barrett Dr. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along sanitary sewer line $ 122,027 $ - $ - S. Jackson Ave. Barrett Dr. Bishop Dr. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along sanitary sewer line $ 62,400 $ - $ - S. Jackson Ave. Bishop Dr. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along sanitary sewer line $ 92,444 $ - $ - S. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Barrett Dr. Local ACP Sealcoat $ - $ - $ 21,026 S. Sealy Ave. Barrett Dr. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction & Overlay Repair base failure and overlay $ 27,733 $ 50,773 $ - S. Snyder Ave. FM 156 Allen Dr. Local ACP Sealcoat Just off FM 156 broken curb & gutter. $ - $ - $ 21,026 S. Snyder Ave. Allen Dr. W. Barrett Dr. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along sanitary sewer line $ 152,533 $ - $ - S. Snyder Ave. W. Barrett Dr. W. 1st St. Local ACP Reconstruction Failure appears to be where waterline was placed. $ 172,178 $ - $ - Santa Fe Trail Goodnight Trail Ridge Dr. Local Conc Repair spawled area Light Microcracking Spawls at end of radius return off Goodnight Trail $ 404 $ - $ 27,597 Scenic Dr. Valley Dr. Hillside Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 34,167 Sierra Trail John Wiley Rd Goodnight Trail Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 3,694 Sierra Trail Goodnight Trail Ridge Dr. Local Conc Repair joint failure Joint failure along gutter valley to inlet at intersection with Ridge Drive $ 404 $ - $ 27,597 Silver Mine Dr. Lakeway Lane Reatta Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 27,597 Summit Dr. Hillside Dr. Valley Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 17,084 Summit Dr. Valley Dr. Valley Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,542 Topeka Ave. E. 4th St. E. 5th St. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 9,159 Topeka Ave. E. 5th St. E. 6th St. Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 Topeka Ave. E. 6th St. E. 7th St. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 9,159 Topeka Ave. E. 7th St. End Local Conc Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 9,159 G/ACP Reconstruction Trail Creek Ln. Downe Rd. End Local Rubble Not real sure if this is a city street $ 181,133 $ - $ - Valley Circle Canyon Dr. End Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Valley Dr. Summit Dr. Summit Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Valley Dr. Summit Dr. Scenic Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Valley Dr. Scenic Dr. Ridgetop Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 8,870 Valley Dr. Ridgetop Dr. Canyon Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microcracking $ - $ - $ 9,199 W. 2nd St. Pafford Ave. N. College Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction $ 27,022 $ - $ - W. 2nd St. N. College Ave. N. Harmonson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction 200' rutting, reconstruct $ 27,022 $ - $ - W. 2nd St. N. Harmonson Ave. N. Denton Ave. Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 18,916 $ - W. 2nd St. N. Denton Ave. N. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Reconstruct due to heavy patterned fractures $ 35,129 $ - $ - W. 2nd St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Repair start of rutting $ 35,129 $ - $ - W. 2nd St. N. Snyder Ave N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along the street $ 35,129 $ - $ - W. 2nd St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 10,194 W. 3rd St. Pafford Ave. N. College Ave. Local ACP Reconstruct rutt and Overlay Start of rutting 5' x 200' repair and replace, then overlay $ 5,200 $ 17,920 $ - W. 3rd St. N. College Ave. N. Harmonson Ave.. Local ACP Reconstruction $ 33,280 $ - $ - W. 3rd St. N. Harmonson Ave. N. Denton Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting on both sides of street $ 33,280 $ - $ - W. 3rd St. N. Denton Ave. N. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting throughout the road $ 33,280 $ - $ - Surface Type: Conc=concrete, ACP=asphalt, SC=seal coat, G=gravel, D=dirt, U=unimproved Roadway maintained by others are not included

26 City of Justin, Texas Street Segments Assessment September 2018 Street From To Pavement Reconstruct Overlay Seal Coat Thoroughfare Surface Road-Classification Notes Cost Cost Cost Category Type Width (LF) Length (LF) ($) ($) ($) W. 3rd St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting repair $ 33,280 $ - $ - W. 3rd St. N. Snyder Ave N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting repair $ 33,280 $ - $ - W. 3rd St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Reconstruct rutt and Overlay Start of rutting in SB lane, repair and overlay $ 13,867 $ 31,858 $ - W. 4th St. N. College Ave. N. Harmonson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruct and Overlay Remove and repair rutted areas and overlay $ 13,867 $ 23,893 $ - W. 4th St. N. Harmonson Ave. N. Denton Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Start of rutting along street $ 44,373 $ - $ - W. 4th St. N. Denton Ave. N. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Road failure down centerline $ 34,133 $ - $ - W. 4th St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 7,646 W. 4th St. N. Snyder Ave N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Significant rutting along ebound lane $ 44,373 $ - $ - W. 4th St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Reconstruction Severe failure spots that need to be reconstructed $ 59,164 $ - $ - W. 5th St. End Leuty Ave. Local Gravel This appears to be a private road. $ - $ 27,806 W. 5th St. Leuty Ave. Pafford Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting starting along street $ 27,867 $ - $ - W. 5th St. Pafford Ave. N. College Ave. Local ACP Reconstruct and Overlay Rutting starting along n. side of street, repair and overlay 80' - 100' $ 6,861 $ 19,507 $ - W. 5th St. N. College Ave. N. Harmonson Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,242 W. 5th St. N. Harmonson Ave. N. Denton Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction High pattern cracking due to base failure - reconstruct roadway. $ 27,867 $ - $ - W. 5th St. N. Denton Ave. N. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting down both sides of street $ 27,022 $ - $ - W. 5th St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along the street $ 35,129 $ - $ - W. 5th St. N. Snyder Ave N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting throughout the road $ 35,129 $ - $ - W. 5th St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Reconstruction Rutting along the street $ 49,920 $ - $ - W. 6th St. N. Denton Ave. N. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,571 W. 6th St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction Appears tp be rutting on EB lanes about halfway between streets. $ 29,333 $ - $ - W. 6th St. N. Snyder Ave N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Reconstruct and Overlay Reconstruct edge failure area and 4' x 200' and overlay $ 12,711 $ 20,533 $ - W. 6th St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,571 W. 7th St. City Limits Eddleman Loop Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 1,254 W. 7th St. Eddleman Loop Leuty Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 41,395 W. 7th St. Leuty Ave. Pafford Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction $ 40,040 $ - $ - W. 7th St. Pafford Ave. N. College Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,899 W. 7th St. N. College Ave. N. Harmonson Ave. Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 21,560 $ - W. 7th St. N. Harmonson Ave. N. Denton Ave. Local ACP Reconstruction $ 40,040 $ - $ - W. 7th St. N. Denton Ave. Creek Hill Way Local ACP Overlay $ - $ 21,560 $ - W. 7th St. Creek Hill Way N. Jackson Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,899 W. 7th St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Overlay Base failure at Jackson Ave. Repair failure and overlay. $ - $ 21,560 $ - W. 7th St. N. Syder Ave. N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,899 W. 7th St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Overlay Severe edge ravel at Baro Well Service with light pattern. $ - $ 21,560 $ - W. 8th St. Creek Hill Way N Jackson Ave. Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,899 W. 8th St. N. Jackson Ave. N. Snyder Ave. Local ACP Overlay Reconstruct failure area and overlay $ - $ 21,560 $ - W. 8th St. N. Snyder Ave. N. Sealy Ave. Local ACP Overlay Reconstruct failure area and overlay $ - $ 21,560 $ - W. 8th St. N. Sealy Ave. FM 156 Local ACP Seal Coat $ - $ - $ 6,899 Windmill Dr. Ovaletta Dr. Allen Dr. Local Conc Seal Coat Microsurface craking $ - $ - $ 23,654 Windmill Dr. Allen Dr. Hardeman Blvd. Local Conc Seal Coat Light Microsurface cracking $ - $ - $ 35,482 Totals $ 4,678,433 $ 980,004 $ 2,255,360 Surface Type: Conc=concrete, ACP=asphalt, SC=seal coat, G=gravel, D=dirt, U=unimproved Roadway maintained by others are not included

27 APPENDIX B DYNATEST PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) SURVEY

28 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey State of the Streets Report Prepared for: City of Justin, Texas June 2018 DYNATEST NORTH AMERICA INC West Braker Lane AUSTIN, TEXAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Background Pavement Management Overview Project Objectives Project Approach PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW Objective PAVER Pavement Management System Overview Inventory and M&R History Modules Inspection Module Prediction Modeling Module Condition Analysis Module M&R Planning Module Reporting Module PAVER Database Development Summary PAVEMENT CONDITION INSPECTION Objective Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Procedure Semi-Automated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey Semi-Automated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey Data Interpretation Existing Pavement Conditions and Field Observations Example Pavement Conditions SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary Recommendations Perform Regular Pavement Condition Inspections Implement Preventive Maintenance Programs for All Pavements GENERAL REMARKS DISCLAIMER i

30 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Dynatest North America, Inc. (Dynatest), at the request of Jacob Martin, performed a semi-automated pavement distress survey on the roadway network of City of Justin (City). The City is located north west of Dallas, in Denton County, Texas and is home to approximately 3,200 residents. Currently, the City s roadway network is comprised of approximately 25 centerline miles of roadway pavements. Approximately 55% of the City s pavement inventory is Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements, and the asphalt concrete (AC) pavements account for approximately 43% of the pavement inventory. The remaining 2% of the network are either unpaved or gravel roadways. 1.2 Pavement Management Overview Pavement management is a systematic approach to forecasting pavement M&R requirements and then optimizing and prioritizing available M&R funding. As shown in Figure 1, the primary objective of pavement management is to preserve pavements in good condition rather than wait for them to fail and then reconstruct them. Preventive Maintenance 100 Pavement Condition (PCI) Rehabilitation Reconstruction 25 Pavement Preservation Pavement Age (Years) Figure 1: Pavement preservation. When the appropriate preventive M&R treatments (e.g., crack sealing, seal coats, etc.) are applied at the correct times during a pavement s service life, these relatively inexpensive preventive M&R treatments can significantly extend the service life of the pavement, as shown in Figure 2. 1

31 100 $1 $2 $7 $15 Pavement Condition (PCI) Seal Coat Thin Overlay Structural Overlay Reconstruction Remaining Service Life = 0 25 Figure 2: Increasing price and decreasing relative benefit of M&R as a function of pavement condition. (Note: Illustrative prices only.) As pavement management concepts have gained traction, computer-based pavement management systems have been developed to assist agencies in more optimally managing their pavements. Pavement management systems currently rely on a comprehensive pavement inventory, regular pavement condition assessments, pavement performance modeling, and sophisticated analysis tools that forecast future pavement condition and estimate future M&R needs. 1.3 Project Objectives The primary objective of this project is to determine the state of streets pavement condition in the form of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) so that the City may more objectively assess the condition of its roadway pavements, better optimize and prioritize the expenditure of its existing M&R funding, and more effectively identify and justify its future roadway pavement M&R funding needs. 1.4 Project Approach Pavement Age (Years) In order to successfully accomplish the objectives of this project, Dynatest performed the following tasks: 1. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) inspection Performed a network-level PCI inspection of the City s roadway pavements 2. Pavement management system database creation Generate the PAVER pavement management system database for the City s roadway pavement network 3. Generate and update the City s Geographical Information System (GIS) shapefile A color coded map showing each evaluated street s PCI value for all the City. These tasks and their outcomes are described in the following sections. 2

32 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW 2.1 Objective The objective of this task was to create a state-of-the art pavement management system database for the City. The intent is for the City to use the system to better manage its roadway pavement network. Dynatest selected the computer software named PAVER on its most current version 7.0. Dynatest developed the City s PAVER database based on a comprehensive inventory of the City s roadway pavement network. 2.2 PAVER Pavement Management System Overview The PAVER pavement management system helps agencies determine when, where, and what level of pavement M&R is required and approximately how much it will cost. The system provides a suite of pavement management software tools that assist agencies in: (1) developing and organizing their pavement inventory; (2) assessing the current condition of their pavements; (3) developing models to predict future pavement conditions; (4) reporting on past and future pavement performance; (5) developing scenarios for M&R based on either budget or condition requirements; and (6) planning M&R projects. The primary PAVER modules include: Inventory M&R History Inspection Prediction Modeling Condition Analysis M&R Planning Project Planning Reporting A brief description of these modules is presented in the following sections Inventory and M&R History Modules The PAVER Inventory and Work History modules are based on a hierarchical structure composed of networks, branches, and sections, with the section being the smallest managed pavement area (e.g., street block). This structure allows users to easily organize their inventory and historical M&R data while providing numerous fields for storing pavement data Inspection Module PAVER uses the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) per ASTM D 6433 as its primary measure of pavement condition. The Inspection module enables agencies to store raw pavement condition survey data and then calculate PCI values Prediction Modeling Module The Prediction Modeling module in PAVER helps identify and group pavements of similar construction that are subjected to similar traffic, weather, and any other factors affecting pavement performance. Historical pavement condition data are used to build models that can be used to predict future pavement performance. If historical pavement data are not available, PAVER provides default pavement prediction curves and allows the user to develop custom prediction curves. 3

33 2.2.4 Condition Analysis Module The condition analysis module allows agencies to view the condition of the entire pavement network or any specified subset of the network over time. The module reports past conditions based on interpolated values between historical condition data, and it reports projected conditions based on prediction models M&R Planning Module The PAVER M&R Planning module is a sophisticated, flexible tool for multi-year, network-level and project-level M&R planning, scheduling, and budgeting. The M&R Planning module is able to determine the consequence of a predetermined budget on pavement condition and the resulting backlog of major work and is also able to determine budget requirements to meet specific management objectives. These capabilities enable agencies to: (1) develop optimal M&R programs given available resources, and (2) justify optimal M&R budget needs Reporting Module Each module of PAVER is capable of generating reports that assist the user in analyzing and interpreting data. PAVER also comes equipped with several canned reports, which include: Summary Charts Simple graphs and data tables of inventory and inspection data Inspection Reports Summary of collected pavement condition data Work History Summary of historical maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation data Branch Listing Summary of overall pavement inventory data Branch Condition Summary of overall pavement condition data Section Condition Summary of individual section data GIS reports Internal/external reporting of inventory and condition data PAVER is capable of generating user-defined reports, which can be tailored to meet the agency s specific reporting needs. PAVER user-defined reports enable the user to extract any data stored in the system and export it to either a spreadsheet or a text file. 2.3 PAVER Database Development The first step in the PAVER database creation was to divide the City s roadway pavements into pavement sections. Each pavement section typically represents a single block of pavement (i.e., intersection to intersection). Pavement sections may be thought of as homogenous areas of pavement to which Major M&R (e.g., resurfacing and reconstruction) would be applied. Dynatest created the City s roadway network utilizing a GIS shapefile as the foundation for the PAVER section definitions, and Dynatest defined approximately 243 pavement sections throughout the City. Dynatest worked with the City to identify data attributes that were to be included for each pavement section in the PAVER database, such as surface type, address from/to locations (when available) for each section, construction dates, etc. As shown in Figure 3, approximately 55% of the City s pavements are considered rigid pavements (PCC surfaced). The City s asphalt pavements account for 43% of the pavement network. The City has a small percentage of gravel (GR) and unsurfaced streets as well. 4

34 Area % AC GR PCC 2.4 Summary Figure 3: Pavement Area by Surface Type A PAVER database was developed that contains all of the relevant data pertaining to the City s roadway pavement network. The suite of tools provided by PAVER will enable the City to more effectively manage its roadway pavement network. 3 PAVEMENT CONDITION INSPECTION 3.1 Objective The objective of the pavement condition inspection was to assess the existing condition of the roadway pavements managed by the City. This was accomplished by performing a semi-automated network-level pavement condition inspection based on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method. Both the pavement condition inspection procedure and general findings of the inspection are discussed in this chapter. 3.2 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Procedure The pavement condition survey was performed following the PCI procedure described in ASTM D The PCI procedure is a more objective and repeatable method for determining existing pavement condition. A PCI value provides an indication of the structural integrity and operational condition for a pavement section. The PCI procedure consists of a routine visual inspection, during which pavement distress types, severity levels, and quantities are identified and recorded. These data are then input into the PCI algorithm to calculate a PCI value. PCI values range from 0 to 100, as shown in Figure 4. 5

35 Figure 4: PCI Inputs and the City s Condition Assessment Scale If properly designed and constructed, a new pavement begins its service life with a PCI of 100. Due to the effects of loading and aging, a pavement deteriorates over time. For each combination of distress type, severity level, and quantity observed, points are deducted from 100, and its PCI decreases. When multiple distresses are present, the deduct values are modified such that the impact of multiple distresses is somewhat lessened. Due to the complexity of the PCI algorithm, PCI values are typically computed using a pavement management software package, such as PAVER. During a PCI inspection, nineteen (19) distress types are identified and evaluated for asphalt pavements and nineteen (19) distress types for concrete pavements, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The City s existing roadway network consists of asphalt and concrete pavements as well as a few gravel roadways. Table 1: Asphalt Pavement Distress Types Code Distress Cause 01 Alligator Cracking Load 02 Bleeding Other 03 Block Cracking Climate/Durability 04 Bumps and Sags Other 05 Corrugation Other 06 Depression Other 07 Edge Cracking Load 08 Joint Reflection Cracking Climate/Durability 09 Lane/Shoulder Drop-Off Other 10 Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking Climate/Durability 11 Patching and Utility Cut Patching Other 13 Pothole Load 14 Railroad Crossing Other 15 Rutting Load 16 Shoving Other 17 Slippage Cracking Other 18 Swell Other 19 Weathering and Raveling Climate/Durability 6

36 Table 2: Concrete Pavement Distress Types Code Distress Cause 21 Blowup/Buckling Climate/Durability 22 Corner Break Load 23 Divided Slab Load 24 Durability ("D") Cracking Climate/Durability 25 Faulting Other 26 Joint Seal Damage Climate/Durability 27 Lane/Shoulder Drop-Off Other 28 Linear Cracking Load 29 Patching, Large and Utility Cuts Other 30 Patching, Small Other 31 Polished Aggregate Other 32 Popouts Other 33 Pumping Other 34 Punchout Load 35 Railroad Crossing Other 36 Scaling, Map Cracking, and Crazing Other 37 Shrinkage Cracks Climate/Durability 38 Spalling, Corner Climate/Durability 39 Spalling, Joint Climate/Durability 3.3 Semi-Automated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey Semi-automated pavement condition surveys were performed in June, Dynatest deployed its State of the Art Pavement Multi-Function Vehicle (MFV) to collect high-quality pavement imagery, Right of Way (ROW) images, pavement profile measurements, and sub-meter accuracy GPS data. The Dynatest MFV is equipped with the latest sensors and hardware required for accurate, high-quality pavement data collection, including: 3D Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS): The LCMS provides high-resolution pavement images. The system is configured to capture 4 meters (m) (approximately 13 ft.) pavement width with 1mm resolution and can operate at speeds up to 60 mph. Dynatest Model RSP-5051 Mark III High-Speed Laser Profiler: The Dynatest Road Surface Profiler (RSP) is equipped with 7 lasers and 2 accelerometers, and is a Class I (highest standard) profiler. In addition to pavement profile measurements, the RSP is capable of calculating International Roughness Index (IRI) and rutting in real time. High-definition Right of Way (ROW) cameras: The system includes two cameras capable of capturing color images in 1920x1080 format or higher. For this project, ROW images were acquired and stored every 20 ft. and all images were georeferenced. Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and GPS: The Applanix POS LV V5 inertial navigation system is for recording sub-meter accuracy GPS coordinates. In addition, our system also captures pavement geometry including cross slope, radius of curvature and longitudinal grade. A picture of the Dynatest MFV equipped with the LCMS system is shown in Figure 5. Sample pavement and ROW images are shown in Figure 6 and 7 respectively. 7

37 Figure 5 Dynatest MFV Equipped with LCMS Figure 6 Sample Downward Pavement Image 8

38 Figure 7 Sample of ROW Image 3.4 Semi-Automated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey Data Interpretation For this project, Dynatest used the ASTM D6433-based modified PCI inspection method developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for performing image-based PCI inspections. This method incorporates systematic random sampling and requires that distresses be recorded by trained inspectors using software that enables the inspectors to identify and record pavement distress types, severities, and quantities visible on collected downward images. Please note: The modified PCI inspection method is described in the textbook, Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots, 2 nd Ed. by M. Y. Shahin, Ph.D., P.E. In an effort to achieve a comprehensive baseline PCI inspection, the City requested that 100% of the collected pavement imagery be inspected and that no sampling strategy be applied. Therefore, the PCI inspection was conducted on 100% of all collected imagery. In combination with the one-lane data collection procedure, this 100% inspection approach resulted in a 50% overall inspection of the City s paved street surfaces. The image-based pavement condition survey was executed using Dynatest s Distress Rating Module (DRM) software, which was developed specifically for performing PCI surveys on image data. As shown in Figure 8, DRM provides users with a graphical representation of and the ability to edit all the data sets collected using the MFV. These data sets, which are accessed and organized by DRM, include downward pavement images, right-of-way (ROW) images, profile datasets, DMI, and GPS readings. 9

39 Figure 8: Dynatest s Distress Rating Module (DRM) Software Dynatest utilized trained and experienced pavement inspectors under the supervision of Project Engineers for post processing collected pavement image data for the City. Each inspector was equipped with a workstation with two high-resolution LCD monitors that enabled him to identify, classify and report the pavement surface distresses using DRM. Visually recorded distress data were then supplemented in DRM by profile data to include any rutting data that was not visible on the collected images. 3.5 Existing Pavement Conditions and Field Observations The City s improved roadway network consists of approximately 25 centerline miles. The collected pavement inspection data were used to calculate a PCI value for each pavement section. Table 3 shows the PCI condition assessment criteria used to analyze the pavement network. Table 3: City s Pavement Condition Assessment Criteria Condition Assessment PCI Value Excellent Good Fair Marginal Poor Very Poor Failed 0 30 At the time of Dynatest s June 2018 inspection, the City s pavements were found to be in overall Marginal condition, with an average PCI of The condition distribution of the City s pavements at the time of inspection is shown in Figure 9, and Table 4 illustrates pavement condition by pavement surface type. 10

40 Area % Excellent Good Fair Marginal Poor Very Poor Failed 0 Figure 9: Overall Pavement Condition Distribution Table 4: Pavement Condition Distribution by Surface Type Surface Sections % Pavement Area SFT Area % Num Sections Wt Avg Condition AC 51 1,415, PCC 48 1,815, GR 2 55, As shown in Figure 10, the overwhelming majority of the City s concrete pavements were observed to be in a good condition, with an overall average PCI value of As shown in Figure 11, the majority of the City s asphalt pavements were observed to be in failed- very poor, and poor conditions, with an overall average PCI of Concrete and asphalt pavements account for approximately 55% and 43%, respectively, of the City s pavement network Marginal Fair Good Excellent Figure 10: Concrete Pavement Condition Distribution at Inspection 11

41 Failed Very Poor Poor Marginal Fair Good Figure 11: Asphalt Pavement Condition Distribution at Inspection The causes of pavement deterioration may be divided into the following three general categories: (1) Load Related, (2) Climate/Durability Related, and (3) Other. Table 5 shows the primary causes of pavement deterioration observed throughout the City s pavement network. Table 5: Categorization of Observed Pavement Distresses Distress Category Load Related Climate/ Durability Related Other Example Distresses Asphalt pavement distresses such as rutting and alligator cracking. Concrete pavement distresses such as corner breaks and divided slabs. Asphalt pavement distresses such as longitudinal and transverse cracking, and block cracking. Concrete pavement distresses such as joint and corner spalling and joint seal damage. Concrete pavement joint Faulting, Scaling, and patching Percentage of Observed Distresses 60% 36% 4% The deterioration observed on the City s pavements was caused primarily by a mixture of climate- and load-related distresses. Climate-related distresses in particular, joint seal damage were found across the City s concrete pavement inventory. However, load-related distresses were most pronounced on the City s asphalt roadways, which tended to be older and nearer the end of their service lives than the City s concrete pavements. 12

42 3.6 Example Pavement Conditions Figure 12 illustrates a variety of pavement conditions observed throughout the City during the survey. Location PCI Sealy Ave (Asphalt) 5 N Denton Ave (Asphalt) 15 S College St (Asphalt) 38 13

43 Barrett DR (Asphalt) 55 Boss Range RD (Asphalt) 42 Ovaletta DR (Concrete) 81 14

44 N Bluebonnet CR (Concrete) 70 Valley DR (Concrete) 88 Goodnight TRL (Concrete) 95 Figure 12: Pavement Conditions Observed during PCI Inspection 15

45 4 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Summary This was the first comprehensive PCI inspection performed on the City s pavements. Overall, the City s pavements were found to be in marginal condition. The majority of the City s concrete pavements, which account for 55% of the City s pavement inventory, exhibited minimal distress and appear to be performing well. The City s asphalt pavements, which account for less than 43% of the City s pavement inventory, exhibited more significant distress and several are in need of Major M&R, such as resurfacing or reconstruction. 4.2 Recommendations Perform Regular Pavement Condition Inspections In an effort to capitalize on this PCI inspection effort and better track the condition of its pavements, it is recommended that the City continue to perform PCI surveys on a two to three year cycle. Doing so will enable the City to: 1. Better track the deterioration of its pavements, 2. Develop pavement deterioration trends to better predict future pavement conditions, and 3. Assess the effectiveness of its pavement preservation and Major M&R activities. While the City s concrete pavements are currently in satisfactory condition, the majority of the pavements were constructed within the past fifteen years and are relatively newer. This suggests that future M&R needs will increase as the City s pavements deteriorate over time. It is necessary that this deterioration be proactively and systematically monitored. In the case of asphalt pavement the current condition shows a need of major rehabilitation or reconstruction that need to be properly design to ensure that the most costeffective solution is selected Implement Preventive Maintenance Programs for All Pavements Based on in-the-field observations, it is evident that the City would benefit from a preventive maintenance program. The City s existing Major M&R backlog due primarily to the condition of the City s asphalt pavements is the driving force behind the City s existing pavement management program. While Major M&R for the City s asphalt pavements is necessary, the City should consider preserving its vast inventory of relatively newer concrete pavements through the application of preventive maintenance activities, such as joint sealing and localized patching. Doing so will extend the life of its pavement inventory and will reduce the rate of deterioration of its pavement network. Due to the nature of concrete pavements, deterioration along a roadway is often isolated to a few slabs. Regular inspections are required to identify maintenance needs as they develop. It is therefore recommended that the City develop a proactive, ongoing routine maintenance inspection and repair cycle for its concrete pavements. For example, the City s concrete pavements may be divided into four zones, and City maintenance staff could inspect each zone annually to identify routine maintenance needs. Following the inspection, maintenance activities may then be scheduled and executed in a timely fashion. It is recommended that a project level structural evaluation of the selected streets for major rehabilitation and/or reconstruction is conducted. The project level structural evaluation will involve using a Falling 16

46 Weight Deflectometer (FWD) coupled with pavement layer thicknesses and types, traffic information and a design period to determine the most cost-effective alternative. 5 GENERAL REMARKS The above analyses were based on semi-automated pavement distress survey and were controlled by the MFV laser based downward images. The pavement condition analyses and associated results provided in this report should be used in conjunction with construction history and current City s maintenance and rehabilitation practices to allocate funding and prioritize roadway intervention. 6 DISCLAIMER Dynatest has made every attempt to base their procedures on sound methodology. However, circumstances beyond the control of Dynatest could result in alterations to the above results, which may be completely justifiable. Report prepared by: Omar Elbagalati, PhD, PE Project Engineer Report reviewed by: Alvaro Ulloa, PhD, PE Senior Engineer 17

47 Canyon Dr 13th St Creek Hill Way Creek Hill Way Rd 12th St S Snyder Ave Ave Atchison Gulf Ave N Sealy Ave e S Jackson Av Mae Dr Dr tta Colorado Ave N Denton Ave e S Denton Ave Harmonson Av N College St Leuty Ave al e S S ea do Honeysuckle Dr wv iew Dr City of Justin PCI Category ly Av e Excellent Allen Dr Good r Fair an ar Ced Cr e st D r Marginal Dr de m hid Boss Range Rd Or c Ha r d Blv Daisey Ln Sage Dr Barrett Dr ea B Downe Rd M Dr S pd Dr E 4th St Indian Paint Dr Bluebonnet Cir t mi ll W 4th St W 2n d S t ge S Hi llto W 5th St W 3rd St olle W i nd W 6th St e Sag Pafford Ave W 7th St SC Ov W 8th St Topeka Ave S Hardeman Cir Dr Ridgetop Dr Va lle y Scenic Dr Summit Dr ± Hillside Dr Poor Goodnight Trl Failed Reatta Dr Ridge Dr Santa Fe Trl Laredo Chisholm Trl Lakeway Ln Very Poor Gravel John Wiley Rd Miles Dynatest North America, Inc. - TBPE Firm Registration No. F Prepared by Omar S. Elbagalati PhD., P.E Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community