KEYS TO SMART SHIP OPERATION. MRV and IMO CO2 regulation how to take the challenge in a smart way

Transcription

1 MRV and IMO CO2 regulation how to take the challenge in a smart way

2 MARINE PERORMANCE Vessel Performance Manager (V-PER) CTS-System: Crew Transfer Support System POWER SKYVIEW Airborne Wind Energy System for power production Carrier systems for maritime surveillance Wind propulsion for ships

3 MRV REGULATION IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION (EU) 2015/757: Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of CO2 emissions in EU waters - From 2018 on - All vessels with 5000 GT and above - Approaching and leaving EU ports - Voyage based report with the following information: (a) port of departure and port of arrival including the date and hour of departure and arrival (b) amount and emission factor for each type of fuel consumed in total (c) CO 2 emitted (d) distance travelled (e) time spent at sea (f) cargo carried (g) transport work

4 MRV REGULATION IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION (EU) 2015/757: Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of CO2 emissions in EU waters - Report on annual basis with the following information: (a) amount and emission factor for each type of fuel consumed in total (b) total aggregated CO 2 emitted within the scope of this Regulation (c) aggregated CO 2 emissions from all voyages between ports under a Member State's jurisdiction (d) aggregated CO 2 emissions from all voyages which departed from ports under a Member State's jurisdiction (e) aggregated CO 2 emissions from all voyages to ports under a Member State's jurisdiction (f) CO 2 emissions which occurred within ports under a Member State's jurisdiction at berth (g) total distance travelled (h) total time spent at sea (i) total transport work (j) average energy efficiency

5 MRV REGULATION IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION (EU) 2015/757 1) Ship owning company (SOC) drafts a emission monitoring plan (MP) per ship 2) SOC selects a verifier and submit the MP to the verifier 3) The verifier assesses the MP 4) SOC monitors the CO2 emissions over one calendar year 5) SOC produces the emission report (ER) 6) SOC send ER to the verifier 7) Verifier verifies ER acc. to the MP and drafts a verification report (VR) 8) If the submitted ER is o.k. the verifier submits a document of compliance (DoC) to the commission 9) SOC submits the verified ER to the commission. (until April 30th of the following year) 10) Commission publishes the results on June 30 th of the following year

6 MRV REGULATION ACTION BY SHIP OWNING COMPANY: 1) Ship owning company (SOC) drafts a emission monitoring plan (MP) per ship 2) SOC selects a verifier and submit the MP to the verifier 3) The verifier assesses the MP 4) SOC monitors the CO2 emissions over one calendar year 5) SOC produces the emission report (ER) 6) SOC send ER to the verifier (within first quarter of the following year) 7) Verifier verifies ER acc. to the MP and drafts a verification report (VR) 8) If the submitted ER is o.k. the verifier submits a document of compliance (DoC) to the commission 9) SOC submits the verified ER to the commission. 10) Commission publishes the results

7 MRV REGULATION ACTION BY SHIP OWNING COMPANY: 1) Ship owning company (SOC) drafts a emission monitoring plan (MP) per ship 2) SOC selects a verifier and submit the MP to the verifier 4) SOC monitors the CO2 emissions over one calendar year 5) SOC produces the emission report (ER) 6) SOC send ER to the verifier (within first quarter of the following year) 9) SOC submits the verified ER to the commission. All these duties above can be delegated to an external company by introducing for instance the performance management system V-Per of SkySails. We are used to collect all the needed information from the ship and the operations, condense them to dedicated reports and take care of the administrative MRV processes until successful submission to the commission

8 MRV REGULATION TIMELINE OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION (EU) 2015/757 Preparation Time First Monitoring Period M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F EU Sub-group Meeting on Verification and Accreditation Monitoring Plans Submitted to Verifiers First Annual Report Submitted to Verifiers Sub-group Reports to ESSF Plenary Document of Compliance Action by EU Bodies Documents Exchanged with Shipping Companies

9 CO2 / Greehouse Gas Emissions Report: Loading port and time of departure Discharging port and time of arrival Distance travelled Cargo transported Emission / conversion factors Aggregated CO2 emissions EEOI Greenhouse gas equivalents (future)

10

11 The smart future of ship operation is not just fulfilling the administrative requirements. We should take those requirements as a motive to think about the effectiveness of our processes and as a chance to improve the economics of shipping. The information have to be collected anyway and why not doing this in a way which safes work on board and onshore, making the processes more effective at you and your customers. Why not providing all parties involved with the same reliable information from one reliable source? Why not providing your customers a better service than your competition? Why not increasing profit by creating synergies?

12 Vessel operation is a complex system influenced by a multitude of nautical, technical und economic factors. Effective performance management requires a system capable to Manual entries on board Measured data Master data - Voyage - Vessel - Crew precisely collect Big Data evaluate and accurately interpret all data provide the information gathered in the right format to the right decision-maker at the right time Information Optimization Individual reporting

13 Examples of operational measures on board: Optimum Trim Savings: ~13%

14 Examples of operational measures: Hull Cleaning: Vessel B Vessel A Vessel A B Vessel C Vessel B Advantages: Low payback time < 3 month Savings of about 20% at the beginning

15 Fuel Consumption Rate [t/d] KEYS TO SMART SHIP OPERATION Examples of operational measures on board: TWO STEPS TO OPTIMUM TRIM 1. Trim Tables Measured fuel consumption rates are evaluated for different draft and trim situations. Data filters and normalization produce high data validity. The results are shown in an easy to read trim table. Trim pre-settings can be done at port 35 filtered data 30 valid data Speed Through Water [kn] 2. Dynamic Trim Optimization Real time fuel consumption data shows the effects of trim changes immediately. Empirical trim optimization on board enables the master to find the optimal trim at any time.

16 Examples of operational measures on board: Weather Adapted Speed and Course Fuel consumption is heavily affected by vessel speed, weather conditions (wind, sea state), trim and current In heavy weather, the ship s fuel consumption rises exponentially Conditions vary during the voyage and so does the optimal ship speed and optimal trim! velocity [kn] With static speed in good weather the vessel is too slow Lost charter revenues With static speed in bad weather the vessel is too fast losses due to high fuel consumption SkySails approach: Dynamic optimal speed according to dynamic reality Dynamic optimization of ship speed and trim throughout the voyage leads to reduced OPEX Usual approach: Static speed (calculated once per voyage) time

17 Costs [1000$] KEYS TO SMART SHIP OPERATION Examples of operational measures: Most Economic Speed vs. Slow Steaming 450 The fuel consumption per nautical mile curve is shown on the Performance Manager main view display best price for the customer total The Profit Speed recommendation is displayed as a green line lowest fuel costs Profit Speed fuel charter fees Speed Over Ground [kn] Total Voyage Costs: Fuel, Charter, Fees Voyage Fuel Costs at Fuel Price 600$/t Voyage Charter at Charter Rate 6300$/d Voyage Fees (Port, Pilot, etc.)

18 Examples of operational measures: Weather Routing

19 Examples of operational measures: Fleet benchmarking 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Recorded Fuel Cons. [%] Eco Optimum Fuel Cons. [%] MPP 1 MPP 2 MPP 3 MPP 4 MPP 5 MPP 6 MPP 7 MPP 8

20 What you have to look for: High-quality proven components Easy integration of existing IT infrastructure Future proof system Customizing options allowing individual configurations Can be installed world-wide during regular ship operation Personal reporting services High quality analytics Individualized and minimized information Management decision support Information transparency (e.g. web access) The job doesn t end wit the delivery, it starts!

21 WELCOME ON BOARD Stephan Brabeck (CTO) SkySails Marine Performance GmbH Luisenweg 40 D Hamburg