SUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. May 9, 2016

Transcription

1 May 9, 2016 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. 215 North 5 th Street Redlands, CA SUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos: The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit this Traffic Assessment for the Emerald Necklace Implementation Plan Phase 1 (referred to as Project ), which is located beside two waterways, the San Gabriel and the Rio Honda. The Project is proposed to include the development of a 17-mile loop of bicycle and multi-use trails which link parks and open spaces through multiple jurisdictions. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS As the proposed Project is not expected to result in a significant increase to vehicular traffic, the primary focus of this traffic assessment was to evaluate potential operational and safety impacts to the following intersection locations: Peck Road at Foothill Transit Driveway Durfee Avenue/San Gabriel Avenue at Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Avenue at Lincoln Avenue The Project proposes to provide a new at-grade trail crossing at each location. The crossings on Peck Road at Foothill Transit, San Gabriel Avenue/Durfee Avenue at Rosemead Boulevard and San Gabriel Avenue at Lincoln Avenue are proposed at existing signalized intersections with pedestrian crosswalks. Signal modifications may be required to add pedestrian, bicycle detection and to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, and intersection warning signs may be used on a path in advance of the intersection to indicate the presence of the crossing and the possibility of turning or entering traffic. Based on the results of this analysis, the increased pedestrian, cyclist and/or equestrian activity is not anticipated to significantly impact current intersection operations. The study area intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the proposed Project Letter Report

2 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 2 of 12 APPENDIX G The Project also proposes a mid-bock crossing along Rosemead Boulevard for the SCE easement trail. It is suggested that the crossing utilize the more visible piano key configuration of longitudinal stripes. This is consistent with guidance in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014 CA MUTCD), which states that this type of marking should be used at locations where a crosswalk might not be expected. The vehicular volumes on Rosemead Boulevard and the potential pedestrian and bicycle activity indicates that a pedestrian traffic signal would be warranted at the mid-block crossing. Finally, in addition to traffic operations, potential impacts to existing on-street parking were also reviewed. The Project proposes to eliminate on-street parking along Clark Street in the vicinity of Varus Street to Durfee Avenue. A parking survey conducted over weekend conditions indicates a maximum of 69 vehicles were parked on Clark Street in the vicinity of the Project. During the same interval, the maximum number of observed vehicles parked on Clark Street between Varus Street and Durfee Avenue was 14. Elimination of on-street parking in this area would potentially result in a significant impact as there is limited opportunity to provide for alternative parking locations in the vicinity. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project is proposed to include the development of a 17-mile loop of bicycle and multi-use trails which link parks and open spaces through multiple jurisdictions as shown on Exhibit 1. Phase I includes 16 projects which are designed to close gaps in the existing regional recreational trails network. However, for the purposes of this analysis, project number four of 16 will be analyzed separately from this Phase I program-level analysis. The 15 projects within Phase I development analyzed in this analysis are provided on Table Letter Report

3 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 3 of 12 APPENDIX G EXHIBIT 1: LOCATION MAP TABLE 1: PHASE I PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Chapter Title 1 Quarry Clasp Park Development 2 Quarry Clasp Multi-Use Trail 3 Quarry Clasp Peck Road Signalized Crossing 5 Rosemead Bike Path 6 Whittier North San Gabriel Bike Path 7 Whittier SCE Easement Bike Path 8 Whittier North Pellissier Multi-Use Trail 9 Whittier North Pellissier Bridge Letter Report

4 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 4 of 12 APPENDIX G EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK 10 San Jose Creek Trails and Bridges 11 San Jose Eastside Trail 12 West Alhambra to Garvey 13 West Side Rosemead Access Ramp 14 West Site Rosemead Underpass 15 West Side Rosemead to Valley 16 West 10 Underpass The following three study area intersections adjacent to crossings of the bicycle and multi-use trails across public streets and one future mid-block crossing location shown on Exhibit 2 and listed in Table 2 were selected for this TIA. TABLE 2: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Intersection Location Jurisdiction 1 E. Lincoln Avenue / San Gabriel Boulevard County of Los Angeles, Montebello 2 Rosemead Boulevard / San Gabriel Boulevard County of Los Angeles, Caltrans 3 Rosemead Boulevard / SCE Easement Future Crossing County of Los Angeles, Caltrans 4 Peck Road / Foothill Transit Driveway City of Arcadia Exhibit 2 illustrates the study area and identifies the number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and intersection traffic controls. EXISTING (2016) TRAFFIC VOLUMES Peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the study area intersections in April Given the uses of trails, weekday PM peak hour (4-6PM) and Saturday morning peak (7-9AM) turning movement counts were collected. Existing (2016) AM and PM peak hour intersection volumes are shown on Exhibit 3. The raw manual peak hour turning movement traffic count data sheets are included in Attachment A. In addition, 24 hour directional volume counts were collected on Rosemead Boulevard near the proposed mid-block crossing near SCE easement. The 24 hour counts showed an average daily count (ADT) of 27, 071 on a weekday and 24,603 on a Saturday. The weekday peak hour volume on Rosemead Boulevard is 2,273 vehicles per hour (vph) and the Saturday peak hour volume is 1,782 vph. The 24 hour count data are also included in Attachment A Letter Report

5 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 5 of 12 APPENDIX G PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. The proposed Project site will consist of approximately acre Passive Park and Trails. Although only a 5 acre park is proposed in the Project, the total area of all the proposed multi-use trails have been added for the purposes of trip generation calculation to provide a conservative estimate. Traffic generation rates for the proposed Project have been derived from (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic General Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) published by San Diego association of Governments (SANDAG). The trip generation rates used for this analysis are shown in Table 3. The rates published by SANDAG are more conservative compared to rates in ITE Trip Generation manual. As such, trip generation rates published by SANDAG have been used to provide a conservative estimate for Project trips. A summary of the proposed Project s trip generation is also shown on Table 3. The Project is anticipated to generate a total of 487 trips per day with approximately 19 AM peak hour trips and 39 PM peak hour trips. The estimated peak hour vehicular Project trips on study area roadways and intersections are nominal. Therefore, the focus of this traffic analysis is to evaluate the existing operations. Addition of Project trips is not expected to have significant impacts on study area roadways and intersections. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The definitions of LOS for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control. The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology was used for the study intersections. Intersection LOS operations are based on an intersection s average control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. For signalized intersections LOS is directly related to the average control delay per vehicle and is correlated to a LOS designation as described in Table 4. TABLE 4: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION HCM 2010 LOS THRESHOLDS Description Average Control Delay (Seconds), V/C 1.0 Level of Service, V/C 1.0 Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length. Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to Level of Service, V/C > to A F to B F to C F Letter Report

6 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 6 of 12 APPENDIX G appear. Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths Source: HCM 2010, Chapter to D F to E F and up F F The definition of an intersection deficiency has been obtained from each of the applicable surrounding jurisdictions. The City of Arcadia, City of Montebello, County of Los Angeles and Caltrans have set the goal for acceptable LOS as LOS D or better, for study area intersections. Existing (2016) peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on HCM 2010 methodology. The intersection operations analysis results are summarized in Table 5 which indicates that the existing study area intersections are currently operating at acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS D or better) during the peak hours. The intersection operations analysis worksheets are included in Attachment B. PROJECT IMPACTS As discussed previously, vehicular Project trips on study area roadways and intersections are nominal. The potential increase in number of pedestrian and bicycle crossings at the crosswalks at study area intersections is unknown. However, based on review of existing delay and LOS at the study area intersections, it appears the potential increase in pedestrian and bicycle crossings will not have a significant impact on delay and LOS with the completion of the Project. The study area intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with Project. TRAIL CROSSING EVALUATION The Project proposes at-grade pedestrian, bicycle and/or equestrian crossings at the following locations. Peck Road at Foothill Transit Driveway Durfee Avenue/San Gabriel Avenue at Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Avenue at Lincoln Avenue Rosemead Boulevard at SCE Easement trail Letter Report

7 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 7 of 12 APPENDIX G Based on information provided from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Safety Program marked crosswalks serve two purposes: they tell the pedestrian the best place to cross; and they clarify that a legal crosswalk exists at a particular location. Marked crosswalks are one tool to get pedestrians safely across the street. When considering marked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations, the question should not simply be: Should I provide a marked crosswalk or not? Instead, the question should be: Is this an appropriate tool for getting pedestrians across the street? Regardless of whether marked crosswalks are used, there remains the fundamental objective of getting pedestrians safely across the street. Marked crosswalks should not be installed in close proximity to traffic signals or stop signs, since pedestrians should be encouraged to cross at the intersection in most situations. The objective of adding a marked crosswalk is to channel pedestrians and bicyclists to safer crossing points. It should be understood, however, that pedestrian crossing behavior may be difficult to control merely by the addition of marked crosswalks. On many roadways, particularly multilane and high-speed crossing location, more substantial improvements are often needed for safer pedestrian crossings. Marked crosswalk alone are not recommended at uncontrolled crossing locations on multilane roads. At uncontrolled pedestrian crossing locations, installing marked crosswalks should not be regarded as a magic cure for pedestrian safety problems. However, marked crosswalks also should not be considered as a negative measure that will necessarily increase pedestrian crashes. Crossings within 350 feet of an existing signalized intersection with pedestrian crosswalks are typically diverted to the signalized intersection for safety purposes. The crossings on Peck Road at Foothill Transit, San Gabriel Avenue/Durfee Avenue at Rosemead Boulevard and San Gabriel Avenue at Lincoln Avenue are proposed at existing signalized intersections with pedestrian crosswalks. Signal modifications may be required to add pedestrian, bicycle detection and to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Intersection Warning signs may be used on a path in advance of the intersection to indicate the presence of the crossing and the possibility of turning or entering traffic. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK The mid-block crosswalk on Rosemead Boulevard at SCE easement trail shall utilize the more visible piano key configuration of longitudinal stripes. This is consistent with guidance in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014 CA MUTCD), which states that this type of marking should be used at locations where a crosswalk might not be expected. The 2014 CA MUTCD states that safety must be considered when evaluating whether to install a mid-block pedestrian crossing. Recognizing the safety concerns associated with mid-block pedestrian crossings, the mid-block crosswalk design concept is supplemented with local and advance warning systems and signage such as the mid-block pedestrian / bicycle signal, pedestrian actuated pedestrian hybrid beacon or rectangular rapid flash beacon (RRFB), Letter Report

8 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 8 of 12 APPENDIX G flashing beacons, and speed feedback sign consistent with the 2014 CA MUTCD criteria shown on Table 1. The 2014 CA MUTCD criteria are based on peak hour traffic volumes and also take the volume of pedestrians / cyclists using the crossing into consideration, as well as the length of the crossing. The warrants for pedestrian traffic signal was evaluated based on Figure 4C-8 from 2014 CA MUTCD and warrants for pedestrian hybrid beacon was evaluated based on Figure 4F- 2 from 2014 CA MUTCD. The vehicular volumes on Rosemead Boulevard (2,273 vph on weekday and 1,782 vph on Saturday) result in the warrants being satisfied based on the minimum threshold crossing volumes of 20 pedestrians / cyclists for a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon or 93 pedestrians / cyclists for a mid-block pedestrian signal. The warrant sheets are provided in Attachment C of this report. No explicit projections of the number of pedestrians / cyclists that will use each crossing are available (and as the crossings do not exist, it is not possible to collect existing counts). However, existing pedestrian and bicycle counts at the intersection of Rosemead Boulevard and San Gabriel Avenue / Durfee Avenue shows approximately 26 pedestrians and 79 bicyclists crossing Rosemead Boulevard during Saturday AM peak period, which indicates mid-block pedestrian/bicycle signal warrant threshold would be satisfied Letter Report

9 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 9 of 12 APPENDIX G TABLE 6 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING DEVICES EVALUATION PARAMETERS TYPE OF CROSSING Criteria Mid-Block Pedestrian / Bike Signal Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Flashing Beacon In-Roadway Flashing Lights Roadway Vehicular Traffic Crossing Traffic Speed Safety Other 2014 CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES Per Figure 4C-6 (4 hours) or Figure 4C-8 (1 hour) of MUTCD 1 Per Figure 4C-6 (4 hours) or Figure 4C-8 (1 hour) of MUTCD 1 Determines which warrant to use Safety must be considered in engineering study At least 100 feet from adjacent driveways or streets; at least 300 feet from nearest signal (or STOP sign) control on the street being crossed. Parking should be prohibited 100' before and 20' beyond crosswalk. Per Figure 4F-1 1. May also determine if gaps in traffic are not adequate to allow pedestrian crossing without control N/A N/A Per Figure 4F-2 N/A N/A May be used to determine if a pedestrian Hybrid beacon is appropriate N/A Parking should be prohibited 100' before and 20' beyond crosswalk. Should be coordinated with nearby signals. 1 Figures referenced based on 85th percentile speed > 35 mph.(see Attachment C ) N/A Used to provide warning. Typical Applications include mid-block crosswalks N/A Used to provide warning. Not for use at crosswalks controlled by Yield, STOP, or Signals. Often have maintenance issues. QUARRY CLASP PARK AND CLARK STREET PARKING EVALUATION The Quarry Clasp Park project consists of the acquisition of land for the development of a 5 acre public park at the intersection of Durfee Avenue and Clark Street within the City of Arcadia. With the acquisition of land, a conceptual park design that features equestrian amenities such Letter Report

10 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 10 of 12 APPENDIX G as trailer parking, picnic areas, restroom facilities, a potable water source, trail maps, native plantings and interpretive signage will be developed. A concept plan is shown on Exhibit 4. EXHIBIT 4: QUARRY CLASP CONCEPT PLAN The County of Los Angeles Code Chapter 22.52, General Regulations, Part 11, Vehicle Parking Space, requires one automobile parking space for each one-half acre of developed park area up to 15 acres. For a 5-acre park, 10 automobile parking spaces would be required per code. The park will include parking space for approximately five horse trailers and five cars Letter Report

11 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 11 of 12 APPENDIX G The Quarry Clasp multi-use trail and bicycle path is intended to connect both a multi-use trail and a combination of Class I bicycle path and Class IV bikeway from the Foothill Transit parking lot on Peck Road to the existing Class I bicycle path on the San Gabriel River. These trails will connect to the extension of the Rio Hondo Class I bicycle path in the Peck Road Water Conservation Park at an existing traffic light on Peck Road at the Foothill Transit Driveway. As shown on Exhibit 5, trail alignment follows the southern edge of the Hanson Quarry, turning south behind the Transit Center and then east to parallel Clark Street. Approximately mid-way towards the San Gabriel River, industrial building development at the quarry edge forces the trails into Clark Street right-of-way. The trail alignments continue on Clark Street through the intersection of Clark Street and Durfee Avenue. EXHIBIT 5: QUARRY CLASP MULTI-USE TRAIL AND BICYCLE PATH On-street parking will be eliminated in the section of Clark Street that will accommodate the two trails. Parking survey was conducted on Clark Street from 7 AM to 7 PM on a weekday and Saturday to determine the impact of elimination of on-street parking on Clark Street. Summary of on-street parking utilization for weekday and Saturday are shown on Tables 7 and 8, respectively. The parking survey data is included in Attachment D Letter Report

12 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. May 9, 2016 Page 12 of 12 APPENDIX G The removal of on-street parking will have more impact on Saturday (weekend) where a maximum of 69 vehicles were parked on both sides of Clark Street. However majority of the vehicles are parked between Foothill Transit Driveway / Kardashian Avenue and Varus Street. The elimination of on-street parking would be needed approximately mid-way towards the San Gabriel River, industrial building development at the quarry edge forces the trails into Clark Street right-of-way, i.e., between Varus Street and Durfee Avenue. A maximum of 14 vehicles were parked on both sides of the Clark Street in the section between Varus Street and Durfee Avenue. Elimination of on-street parking would create a significant parking impact for the vehicles currently being parked in this section of Clark Street. TABLE 7: ON-STREET PARKING ON CLARK STREET, TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2016 Clark Street Foothill Transit DW to Varus Clark Street Varus to Cogswell Clark Street Cogswell to Durfee TOTALS 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 North Side South Side North Side South Side North Side South Side North Side South Side TOTAL TABLE 8: ON-STREET PARKING ON CLARK STREET, SATURDAY, APRIL 12, 2016 Clark Street Foothill Transit DW to Varus Clark Street Varus to Cogswell Clark Street Cogswell to Durfee TOTALS 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 North Side South Side North Side South Side North Side South Side North Side South Side TOTAL If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) , extension 205. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Pranesh Tarikere, PE Senior Engineer Letter Report

13

14

15 APPENDIX Table 3 G Project Trip Generation Summary ITE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday Land Use Code Units 1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Project Trip Generation Rates Passive Park 2 AC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Quantity Units 2 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Project Trip Generation Summary Park AC AC = Acres 2 Trip Generation Source: (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, April 2002 for Regional Park (Developed).

16 Table 4 Intersection Analysis for Existing (2016) Conditions Intersection Approach Lanes 1 Delay 2 Level of Acceptable Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service # Intersection Control 3 LOS L T R L T R L T R L T R PM Sat PM Sat 1 E. Lincoln Av. / San Gabriel Bl. TS B A D 2 Rosemead Bl. / San Gabriel Bl./Durfee Av. TS d 1 2 1> D D D 4 Peck Rd. / Foothill Transit Dwy. TS 1 2 d 1 2 d A A D When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. Per the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. TS = Traffic Signal L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right Turn Overlap Phasing; d= Defacto Right Turn Lane

17 ATTACHMENT A TRAFFIC COUNTS (2016) Letter Report

18 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Project # TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: Lincoln Avenue Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd San Gabriel Blvd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES: NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PEAK HR FACTOR:

19 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Job # Lincoln Avenue IN OUT N 0 0. San Gabriel Blvd PM San Gabriel Blvd PM PM IN PM IN 1344 Peak Hour Data 530 OUT OUT PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Lincoln Avenue IN OUT Lincoln Avenue / San Gabriel Blvd (Intersection Name) TUESDAY Day 4/12/2016 Date COUNT PERIOD pm 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PM PEAK HOUR 445 PM

20 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Project # PEDESTRIANS 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd TOTAL Peak Hr 445

21 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Project # BICYCLES 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd TOTAL Peak Hr

22 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Project # TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: Rosemead Boulevard Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES: NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PEAK HR FACTOR:

23 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Av Job # IN OUT N Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave PM San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave PM PM IN PM IN 709 Peak Hour Data 151 OUT OUT PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Rosemead Boulevard IN OUT Rosemead Boulevard / San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave (Intersection Name) TUESDAY Day COUNT PERIOD 4/12/2016 Date pm 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PM PEAK HOUR 500 PM

24 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Project # PEDESTRIANS 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave TOTAL Peak Hr

25 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: TUESDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Project # BICYCLES 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave TOTAL Peak Hr

26 City of El Monte Peck Road N/ Foothill Transit Driveway 24 Hour Directional Volume Count APPENDIX G Counts Unlimited, Inc PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Phone: counts@countsunlimited.com Page 1 ELMPENFO Site Code: Start 4/12/2016 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Total Combined Total AM Peak - 07: : Vol P.H.F PM Peak : : Vol P.H.F Percentag 38.9% 61.1% 38.4% 61.6% e ADT/AADT ADT 23,386 AADT 23,386

27 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Project # TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: Lincoln Avenue Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd San Gabriel Blvd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL AM Peak Hr Begins at: 800 AM PEAK VOLUMES: NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PEAK HR FACTOR:

28 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Job # Lincoln Avenue IN OUT N 0 0. San Gabriel Blvd AM San Gabriel Blvd AM AM IN AM IN 287 Peak Hour Data 253 OUT OUT AM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Lincoln Avenue IN OUT Lincoln Avenue / San Gabriel Blvd (Intersection Name) SATURDAY Day 4/16/2016 Date COUNT PERIOD am 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM

29 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Project # PEDESTRIANS 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd TOTAL Peak Hr 80 0

30 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Lincoln Avenue Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd Project # BICYCLES 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd Lincoln Avenue San Gabriel Blvd TOTAL Peak Hr

31 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Project # TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: Rosemead Boulevard Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL AM Peak Hr Begins at: 800 AM PEAK VOLUMES: NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PEAK HR FACTOR:

32 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Av Job # IN OUT N Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave AM San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave AM AM IN AM IN 86 Peak Hour Data 77 OUT OUT AM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Rosemead Boulevard IN OUT Rosemead Boulevard / San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave (Intersection Name) SATURDAY Day COUNT PERIOD 4/16/2016 Date am 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM

33 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Project # PEDESTRIANS 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave TOTAL Peak Hr

34 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Rosemead Boulevard Day: SATURDAY E/W: San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Project # BICYCLES 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave Rosemead Boulevard San Gabriel Blvd / Durfee Ave TOTAL Peak Hr

35 City of El Monte Peck Road N/ Foothill Transit Driveway 24 Hour Directional Volume Count APPENDIX G Counts Unlimited, Inc PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Phone: counts@countsunlimited.com Page 1 ELMPENFOSAT Site Code: Start 4/16/2016 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Total Combined Total AM Peak - 10: : Vol P.H.F PM Peak : : Vol P.H.F Percentag 37.6% 62.4% 32.2% 67.8% e ADT/AADT ADT 19,956 AADT 19,956

36 City of El Monte Rosemead Boulevard At SCE Pathway 24 Hour Directional Volume Count APPENDIX G Counts Unlimited, Inc PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Phone: counts@countsunlimited.com Page 1 ELMROSCE Site Code: Start 4/12/2016 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Total Combined Total AM Peak - 06: : Vol P.H.F PM Peak : : Vol P.H.F Percentag 42.5% 57.5% 35.3% 64.7% e ADT/AADT ADT 27,071 AADT 27,071

37 City of El Monte Rosemead Boulevard At SCE Pathway 24 Hour Directional Volume Count APPENDIX G Counts Unlimited, Inc PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Phone: counts@countsunlimited.com Page 1 ELMROSCESAT Site Code: Start 4/16/2016 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Total Combined Total AM Peak - 10: : Vol P.H.F PM Peak : : Vol P.H.F Percentag 33.7% 66.3% 33.0% 67.0% e ADT/AADT ADT 24,603 AADT 24,603

38 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: TUESDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Project # TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: Peck Road Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway Foothill Transit Driveway Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 430 PM PEAK VOLUMES: NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PEAK HR FACTOR:

39 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: TUESDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Job # IN OUT N Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway PM Foothill Transit Driveway PM PM IN PM IN 0 Peak Hour Data 0 OUT OUT PM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Peck Road IN OUT Peck Road / Foothill Transit Driveway (Intersection Name) TUESDAY Day 4/12/2016 Date COUNT PERIOD pm 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PM PEAK HOUR 430 PM

40 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: TUESDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Project # PEDESTRIANS 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway TOTAL Peak Hr

41 Location: El Monte Date: 4/12/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: TUESDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Project # BICYCLES 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway TOTAL Peak Hr

42 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: SATURDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Project # TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: Peck Road Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway Foothill Transit Driveway Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL AM Peak Hr Begins at: 800 AM PEAK VOLUMES: NL NT NR RTOR SL ST SR RTOR EL ET ER RTOR WL WT WR RTOR TOTAL PEAK HR FACTOR:

43 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: SATURDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Job # IN OUT N Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway AM Foothill Transit Driveway AM AM IN 2 0 AM 8 14 IN 0 Peak Hour Data 0 OUT OUT AM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Peck Road IN OUT Peck Road / Foothill Transit Driveway (Intersection Name) SATURDAY Day 4/16/2016 Date COUNT PERIOD am 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM

44 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: SATURDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Project # PEDESTRIANS 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway TOTAL Peak Hr

45 Location: El Monte Date: 4/16/2016 N/S: Peck Road Day: SATURDAY E/W: Foothill Transit Driveway Project # BICYCLES 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: East Leg West Leg South Leg North Leg Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway Peck Road Foothill Transit Driveway TOTAL Peak Hr

46 ATTACHMENT B EXISTING (2016) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS Letter Report

47 Timings Emerald Necklace (JN 07442) 1: E. Lincoln Av. & San Gabriel Bl. 5/5/2016 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 76.0% 76.0% 76.0% 76.0% 24.0% 24.0% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS A A E A D E Approach Delay Approach LOS A C E Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: E. Lincoln Av. & San Gabriel Bl. Existing (2016) Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 1

48 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Emerald Necklace (JN 07442) 1: E. Lincoln Av. & San Gabriel Bl. 5/5/2016 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS A A C A D E Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS A B D Timer Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.4 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing (2016) Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 2