BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM
|
|
- Marjorie Rogers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority 555 Uinta Way Denver, CO January 18, 2013
2 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Updated Land Uses... 3 Adjustments to the Transportation Network... 6 Traffic Analysis Queuing Analysis Conclusions Appendices: A. Trip Generation and Internal Capture Calculations B. Synchro Level of Service Analysis Output C. Quebec St & Alameda Ave Reanalysis with Original 2030 Redevelopment Volumes D. SimTraffic Queuing Analysis Output List of Figures Figure 1 Transportation Hierarchy... 8 Figure Intersection Lane Geometry... 9 Figure 3 Site Traffic Distribution Figure AM Traffic Volumes and Intersection Level of Service Figure PM Traffic Volumes and Intersection Level of Service List of Tables Table 1 Trip Generation... 5 Table 2 Screen-line Analysis Summary... 6 Table 3 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Table Signalized Intersection Level of Service C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 2
3 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Introduction The purpose of this traffic analysis addendum is to analyze the traffic impacts of the refined Buckley Annex land use plan and roadway network included in the General Development Plan ( GDP ) while respecting the guiding principles and work accomplished with the original Buckley Annex Redevelopment Plan dated February 2008 ( Redevelopment Plan ). Through multiple iterations and public/stakeholder meetings, a number of refinements to the original Redevelopment Plan have been recommended and incorporated into the GDP. Those changes that may have a potential impact to the transportation system have been analyzed in greater detail and include the following items. 1. Land Uses: a. The GDP calls for 800 residential units including 120 single family detached, 230 single family attached, and 450 apartments as well as up to 200,000 square feet of commercial. 2. Roadway Network: a. The proposed section for Lowry Blvd has been reduced from a 5-lane section to a 3-lane section from Monaco Pkwy to Pontiac St in order to create a roadway that provides both mobility and access without creating a barrier to pedestrians and bicyclists. b. The ¾ access originally proposed for the intersection of Quebec St & Archer Pl has been converted to a right-in/right-out. c. The right-in/right-out originally proposed at Quebec St & Ellsworth Ave has been removed and Ellsworth Ave has been converted to a pedestrian corridor. d. The ¾ access originally proposed at Monaco Pkwy & Bayaud Ave has been removed. e. The right-in/right-out access originally proposed at Monaco Pkwy & Southmoor Dr has been removed. Updated Land Uses The GDP includes 800 residential units and up to 200,000 square feet of commercial. The residential units are further subdivided to 120 single family detached homes, 230 single family attached homes, and 450 apartments. At this time it is anticipated that the commercial space will be divided between 83,000 square feet retail and 117,000 square feet of office space. The vehicle trips associated with the GDP were then calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Eighth Edition. This methodology consists of choosing an independent variable for the land use for a particular time of day. The independent variable is the measurement that appears to be the cause for the variation in trip ends and is related to the land use. The value of the independent variable is either multiplied by a weighted average or plugged into a regression equation to calculate the trips generated by the land use. The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides guidance on when to use the weighted average versus the regression equation. In most cases, the regression equations are recommended when there are adequate study data points. C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 3
4 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM ITE Land Use Codes 210 Single Family Detached Housing, Apartment, 230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse, Office, and 814 Specialty Retail were used to calculate AM, PM, and Daily trips. There is no AM peak hour rate for Specialty Retail so the rate is derived from the PM peak rate and a ratio of the AM/PM rates for the ITE Shopping Center (820) land use. Table 1 shows the trips anticipated to be generated by the site, and Appendix A contains the trip generation calculations. In mixed-use developments such as this one, a number of the trips will be contained internal to the site. The Trip Generation Handbook An ITE Recommended Practice provides procedures for calculating the anticipated rate of internal capture and was used for this analysis. It should be noted that the AM peak internal trips are estimates because ITE does not currently have data for this time period. Table 1 shows the anticipated internal capture rates, and Appendix A contains the internal capture calculation. As shown in Table 1, it is anticipated that the daily trips generated by the site will continue to be less than the 9,500 vehicle trips per day generated by the current government office building when it was fully occupied. C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 4
5 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Table 1 Trip Generation ITE Land Use Quantity Units %in %out Total In Out Code AM Peak Hour 210 Single Family Detached 120 Units 25% 75% Apartment 450 Units 20% 80% Townhomes/Condos 230 Units 17% 83% Office 117 Ksqft 88% 12% Specialty Retail 83 Ksqft 61% 39% PM Peak Hour Subtotal % Internal Capture = AM Peak Hour Trips = Single Family Detached 120 Units 63% 37% Apartment 450 Units 65% 35% Townhomes/Condos 230 Units 67% 33% Office 117 Ksqft 17% 83% Specialty Retail 83 Ksqft 44% 56% Subtotal Daily 7% Internal Capture = PM Peak Hour Trips = Single Family Detached 120 Units 50% 50% 1, Apartment 450 Units 50% 50% 2,851 1,425 1, Townhomes/Condos 230 Units 50% 50% 1, Office 117 Ksqft 50% 50% 1, Specialty Retail 83 Ksqft 50% 50% 3,588 1,794 1,794 Subtotal 10,502 5,251 5,251 10% Internal Capture = 1, Daily Trips = 9,452 4,726 4,726 C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 5
6 Adjustments to the Transportation Network BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM The Buckley Annex GDP calls for a number of adjustments from the original Redevelopment Plan. The most obvious change can be found in the cross section for Lowry Boulevard between Monaco Pkwy and Pontiac St. In order to create a roadway that provides both mobility and access without creating a barrier to pedestrians and bicyclists, the proposed section has been reduced from 5-lanes to 3-lanes. To determine the potential impact this may cause to the overall roadway system, a screen-line analysis was conducted looking at Lowry Blvd, 1 st Ave, and Alameda Ave. Existing traffic volumes were counted on Wednesday, November 7, 2012, and were supplied to the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) to obtain calibrated 2025 and 2035 traffic projections. In order to directly compare the future traffic volumes to those used in the original Redevelopment Plan, the 2025 and 2035 DRCOG traffic projections were averaged to find 2030 traffic projections. The DRCOG model assumes the existing roadway laneage will be present in 2030 and does not include the Buckley Annex Redevelopment. This No-Build condition anticipates the 2-lane 1 st Avenue would carry 7,500 vehicles per day and the 6-lane Alameda Avenue would carry 45,300 vehicles per day. Using the generalized daily service volumes for urban street facilities found in the TRB Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (HCM 2010), the capacity of these roadways is approximately 59,000 vehicles per day with an anticipated 2030 volume to capacity ratio of Using the traffic counts conducted in 2012 and the updated DRCOG projections, the 2030 traffic volumes were adjusted to account for build-out of the site and the extension of Lowry Boulevard to Monaco Parkway. By reducing the cross section of Lowry Boulevard from 5-lanes to 3-lanes, the capacity of this east-west roadway is also reduced which will cause vehicles to route themselves to roadways with more available capacity. Using a screen-line analysis, it is anticipated that the 2-lane 1 st Avenue will carry 6,600 vehicles per day, the 6-lane Alameda Avenue will carry 42,200 vehicles per day, and a 3-lane Lowry Boulevard will now carry 13,500 vehicles per day. Using the HCM 2010, the eastwest capacity of these roadways is approximately 74,400 with an anticipated 2030 volume to capacity ratio of Table 2 summarizes the screen-line analysis. C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 6
7 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Table 2 Screen-line Analysis Summary Major 2012 K- D- No-Build 3 2-Lane 1 st / 2-Lane 1 st / 5-Lane Lowry 3-Lane Lowry East/West Exist Factoor Fact Streets Traffic ADT 1 Capacity Capacity Capacity 2 ADT ADT 1 st Avenue 6, ,500 12,600 6,100 12,600 6,600 12,600 Lowry Boulevard N/A N/A N/A 15,200 31,400 13,500 15,400 Alameda Avenue 39, ,300 46,400 41,000 46,400 42,200 46,400 Screenline Volume 45,600 52,800 62,300 62,300 Screenline Capacity 59,000 59,000 90,400 74,400 V/C Ratio ADT calculated using the average of the calibrated DRCOG Traffic Model outputs for 2025 and Capacities derived using Exhibit in the HCM2010, and LOS D or better for the roadway segment No-Build assumes the site remains as-is and Lowry Blvd is not extended. Additional modifications to the roadway network include changes to the limited access points on Monaco Pkwy and on Quebec St. On Monaco Pkwy, both the ¾ access at Bayaud St and the rightin/right-out access at Southmoor Dr have been removed. On Quebec Street, Ellsworth Ave has been converted to a pedestrian corridor in the GDP so the right-in/right-out access on Quebec St has been removed, and the intersection at Archer Place has been converted from a ¾ access to a right-in/rightout. As discussed in the original Redevelopment Plan, the intersection of Quebec St & Archer Pl was changed from a ¾ access to a right-in/right-out, but the change came late in the design process so it was not incorporated in the traffic analysis. Figure 1 shows the transportation hierarchy in the GDP, and Figure 2 shows the intersection lane geometry. These changes to the roadway network also predicate the need adjust the site-traffic distribution. Using the traffic distribution created in the original Redevelopment Plan as a starting point, the site traffic has been shifted to the nearest point of access. Figure 3 shows the previous distribution and the updated distribution. C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 7
8 Figure 1 - Transportation Hierarchy BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 8
9 Figure Intersection Lane Geometry BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 9
10 Figure 3 Site Traffic Distribution BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 10
11 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Traffic Analysis The changes discussed previously in this Addendum have been analyzed in greater detail to determine their impacts on the transportation system. The methodology and results of the analysis are discussed below. Subsequent to the traffic analysis being conducted, updated 2030 traffic projections were received from the Denver Regional Council of Governments. Although the updated DRCOG projections show increased volumes in 2030, the peak hour impact to the intersections is only a 1-2% increase in traffic and considered negligible to the results of the analysis. The traffic analysis begins with the 2030 traffic volumes projected in the original Redevelopment Plan as the basis. Using the results of the screen-line analysis, the ADTs were updated for 1 st Ave, Lowry Blvd, and Alameda Ave. The changes in ADT were then used to determine the change in AM and PM peak hour link volume on the three east-west roadways using the conservative assumption that the AM and PM peak hours account for 10% of the ADT each. The changes in peak hour link volumes were then distributed across the roadway network in proportion to the 2030 traffic movement volumes. The resulting turn movement volumes were then adjusted again to account changes in the site traffic distribution. Figure 3 shows the updated 2030 AM traffic volumes, and Figure 4 shows the updated 2030 PM traffic volumes. The 2030 traffic volumes were then analyzed using Synchro 8 software to determine how efficiently and effectively the street system accommodates the traffic volumes. The results are shown as Levels of Service (LOS) where LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow and delay, ranging from excellent conditions at LOS A to very poor conditions at LOS F. The City and County of Denver tries to maintain a minimum of LOS D for intersection operations. Table 3 provides a description of conditions for each level of service at a signalized intersection. Table 3 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Average Stopped Delay* Description A <10 Very low delay. Most vehicles do not stop. B >10 to 20 Generally good progression. Slight delays. C >20 to 35 Increased number of stopped vehicles D >35 to 55 Noticeable congestion. E >55 to 80 High delays and frequent cycle failures. F >80 Forced flow. Extensive queuing. *Seconds per vehicle. Source: HCM2010 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2010) As shown in Table 4, most of the intersection levels of service did not degrade from the original Redevelopment Plan. The lone exception is the intersection of Quebec St & Alameda Ave. In this case, the change from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual to the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual caused the reduction in level of service from LOS D to LOS E. Figures 4 and 5 show the intersection levels of service for the AM and PM peak hours respectively. Appendix B contains the Synchro output. Appendix C C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 11
12 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM contains the reanalysis of Quebec St & Alameda Ave using the 2010 HCM and the 2030 volumes contained in the original Redevelopment Plan. Table Signalized Intersection Level of Service Intersection 2008 Plan AM Peak 2012 Plan 2008 Plan PM Peak 2012 Plan Monaco & Alameda D D E E Monaco & Lowry B B B A Monaco & 1 st Ave B B C C Quebec & Alameda D E* D E* Quebec & Lowry C B C C Quebec & 1 st Ave B B C C Lowry & Pontiac n/a A n/a B * Reduction in LOS caused by the change from the 2000 HCM to the 2010 HCM. See Appendix C. Queuing Analysis Due to the proximity of Pontiac Street in relation to Quebec Street, the 2030 roadway network was analyzed using SimTraffic simulation software for the AM and PM peak hour periods to confirm the back to back left turn lanes will operate sufficiently. Based on industry guidelines, the simulation was performed using a 5 minute seed time, a 15 minute Peak Hour Factor, and a 45 minute Anti-Peak Hour Factor. Each simulation was run three times and then averaged. Based on this analysis, the 95 th percentile queue length on Lowry Blvd for the dual eastbound left turn lanes at Quebec St is anticipated to be 100 feet while the anticipated 95 th percentile queue length for the westbound left turn lane at Pontiac is anticipated to be 25 feet. With a link distance of about 510 feet between intersections, the analysis shows that the design can accommodate the projected left turn queues under the conditions examined. Appendix D contains the SimTraffic queue analysis output. C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 12
13 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Figure AM Traffic Volumes and Intersection Level of Service 6,600 ADT 13,500 ADT 42,200 ADT C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 13
14 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Figure PM Traffic Volumes and Intersection Level of Service 6,600 ADT 13,500 ADT 42,200 ADT C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 14
15 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Conclusions The purpose of this traffic analysis addendum is to analyze the traffic impacts of the refined Buckley Annex land use plan and roadway network included in the General Development Plan ( GDP ) while respecting the guiding principles and work accomplished with the original Buckley Annex Redevelopment Plan dated February 2008 ( Redevelopment Plan ). The General Development Plan calls for 800 residential units including 120 single family detached, 230 single family attached, and 450 apartments as well as 83,000 square feet of specialty retail and 117,000 square feet of office. At build-out, it is anticipated that the site will generate approximately 9,500 vehicles per day. This volume is the same as that used in the previous traffic study for the site and is also the same volume of traffic that was historically generated by the existing government office building when it was fully occupied. In order to create an east-west roadway that provides both mobility and access without creating a barrier to pedestrians and bicyclists, the proposed section for Lowry Boulevard has been reduced from 5-lanes to 3-lanes. A screen-line analysis was conducted for the three east-west roadways in proximity to the project (1 st Avenue, Lowry Boulevard, and Alameda Avenue) and showed that the reduced eastwest capacity of Lowry Boulevard could be picked up by Alameda Avenue and 1 st Avenue. Additional changes to the land plan include a. The conversion of the ¾ access originally proposed for the intersection of Quebec St & Archer Pl to a right-in/right-out, b. Removal of the right-in/right-out originally proposed at Quebec St & Ellsworth Ave and the conversion of Ellsworth Ave to a pedestrian corridor, c. The removal of the ¾ access originally proposed at Monaco Pkwy & Bayaud Ave, and d. The removal of the right-in/right-out access originally proposed at Monaco Pkwy & Southmoor Dr. The major signalized intersections in vicinity to the project were then analyzed and compared to the original Redevelopment Plan traffic study. In order to conduct the analysis while respecting the work done previously, the 2030 volumes from the 2008 study were used as a starting point. The volumes were first adjusted based on the results of the screen-line analysis, and then adjusted again to pick up the modified site traffic caused by the changes in access on Monaco Pkwy and Quebec St. The result of the analysis show that levels of service will not be adversely affected by the changes included in the General Development Plan, and the anticipated 95 th percentile queue lengths can be contained within back to back left turn lanes on Lowry Boulevard between Pontiac Street and Quebec Street. C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx Page 15
16 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Appendix A Trip Generation and Internal Capture Calculations C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx
17 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Appendix B Synchro Level of Service Analysis Output C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx
18 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Appendix C Quebec St & Alameda Ave Reanalysis with Original 2030 Redevelopment Volumes C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx
19 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Appendix D SimTraffic Queuing Analysis Output C:\Documents and Settings\Hilarie\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I7DA6XYA\0-Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx
20 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Appendix A Trip Generation and Internal Capture Calculations R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Report\0 Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx
21 Appendix A Buckley Annex 2030 Trip Generation Daily Year Code Land Use Quantity Units %in %out Total In Out 2030 Single-Family 210 Detached Housing 120 UNITS 50% 50% 1, Apartments 450 UNITS 50% 50% 2,851 1,425 1, Townhomes/Condos 230 UNITS 50% 50% 1, Office 117 KSQFT 50% 50% 1, Specialty Retail 83 KSQFT 50% 50% 3,588 1,794 1,794 Subtotal 10,502 5,251 5,251 Internal Capture 4 10% 1, TOTAL 9,452 4,726 4,726 AM Peak Year Code Land Use Quantity Units %in %out Total In Out 2030 Single-Family 210 Detached Housing 120 UNITS 25% 75% Apartments 450 UNITS 20% 80% Townhomes/Condos 230 UNITS 17% 83% Office 117 KSQFT 88% 12% Specialty Retail 3 83 KSQFT 61% 39% Subtotal Internal Capture 4 2% TOTAL PM Peak Year Code Land Use Quantity Units %in %out Total In Out Notes: 2030 Single-Family 210 Detached Housing 120 UNITS 63% 37% Apartments 450 UNITS 65% 35% Townhomes/Condos 230 UNITS 67% 33% Office 117 KSQFT 17% 83% Specialty Retail 83 KSQFT 44% 56% Subtotal Internal Capture 4 7% TOTAL The land use information is based on the presentation made to the Lowry Planning/Disposition Subcommittee on 6/21/ The trip generation values are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. 3. There is no AM peak hour rate for Specialty Retail so the rate is derived from the PM peak rate and a ratio of the AM/PM rates for the ITE Shopping Center (820) land use. 4. The internal capture rate is calculated based on the procedures outlined in the Trip Generation Handbook - An ITE Recommended Practice; however, please note that the AM peak internal trips are estimates because ITE does not currently have data for this time period. R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Trip Generation\Buckley Annex Trip Generation.xls Page 1 of 4
22 Appendix A Buckley Annex 2030 Trip Generation For the 4 blocks adjacent to the intersection of Lowry Blvd & Pontiac St AM Peak Year Code Land Use Quantity Units %in %out Total In Out NE Block Apartments 0 UNITS 20% 80% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 17% 83% Office 110 KSQFT 88% 12% Specialty Retail 3 36 KSQFT 61% 39% Sub-Total Internal Capture 4 2% NE Block Total SE Block Apartments 230 UNITS 20% 80% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 17% 83% Office 0 KSQFT 88% 12% Specialty Retail 3 0 KSQFT 61% 39% Sub-Total Internal Capture 4 2% SE Block Total NW Block Apartments 170 UNITS 20% 80% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 17% 83% Office 7 KSQFT 88% 12% Specialty Retail 3 7 KSQFT 61% 39% Sub-Total Internal Capture 4 2% SE Block Total SW Block Apartments 0 UNITS 20% 80% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 17% 83% Office 0 KSQFT 88% 12% Specialty Retail 3 22 KSQFT 61% 39% Sub-Total Internal Capture 4 2% SE Block Total R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Trip Generation\Buckley Annex Trip Generation.xls Page 2 of 4
23 Appendix A Buckley Annex 2030 Trip Generation For the 4 blocks adjacent to the intersection of Lowry Blvd & Pontiac St PM Peak Year Code Land Use Quantity Units %in %out Total In Out NE Corner Apartments 0 UNITS 65% 35% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 67% 33% Office 110 KSQFT 17% 83% Specialty Retail 36 KSQFT 44% 56% Subtotal Internal Capture 4 7% TOTAL SE Corner Apartments 230 UNITS 65% 35% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 67% 33% Office 0 KSQFT 17% 83% Specialty Retail 0 KSQFT 44% 56% Subtotal Internal Capture 4 7% TOTAL NW Corner Apartments 170 UNITS 65% 35% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 67% 33% Office 7 KSQFT 17% 83% Specialty Retail 7 KSQFT 44% 56% Subtotal Internal Capture 4 7% TOTAL SW Corner Apartments 0 UNITS 65% 35% Townhomes/Condos 0 UNITS 67% 33% Office 0 KSQFT 17% 83% Specialty Retail 22 KSQFT 44% 56% Subtotal Internal Capture 4 7% TOTAL Notes: 1. The land use information is based on the presentation made to the Lowry Planning/Disposition Subcommittee on June 21, 2. The trip generation values are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. 3. There is no AM peak hour rate for Specialty Retail so the rate is derived from the PM peak rate and a ratio of the AM/PM rates for the ITE Shopping Center (820) land use. 4. The internal capture rate is calculated based on the procedures outlined in the Trip Generation Handbook - An ITE Recommended Practice; however, please note that the AM peak internal trips are estimates because ITE does not currently have R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Trip Generation\Buckley Annex Trip Generation.xls Page 3 of 4
24 Appendix A Buckley Annex Internal Capture Calculation 4 Daily AM Peak PM Peak ITE Land Use (ITE Code) Quantity Units Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Single-Family Detached Housing (210) 120 DU 1, Apartments (220) 450 DU 2,851 1,425 1, Townhomes/Condos (230) 230 DU 1, Subtotal 5,408 2,704 2, Internal From/To Retail From/To Office Office (710) 117 KSQFT 1, Internal From/To Residential From/To Retail Specialty Retail (814) 3 83 KSQFT 3,588 1,794 1, Internal From/To Residential From/To Office Sub-Total 10,502 5,251 5, Internal Capture Internal Capture Percentage 10% 10% 10% 2% 2% 2% 7% 7% 7% Total 9,503 4,751 4, Notes: 1. The land use information is based on the presentation made to the Lowry Planning/Disposition Subcommittee on June 21, The trip generation values are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. 3. There is no AM peak hour rate for Specialty Retail so the rate is derived from the PM peak rate and a ratio of the AM/PM rates for the ITE Shopping Center (820) land use. 4. The internal capture rate is calculated based on the procedures outlined in the Trip Generation Handbook - An ITE Recommended Practice; however, please note that the AM peak internal trips are estimates because ITE does not currently have data for this time period. R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Trip Generation\Buckley Annex Trip Generation.xls Page 4 of 4
25 BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Appendix B Synchro Level of Service Analysis Output R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Report\0 Buckley Annex Traffic Addendum docx
26 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 1: Monaco Pkwy & Alameda Ave Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS D D D C B D D D D D Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS D B D D Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 36.9 HCM 2010 Level of Service D R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
27 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 2: Monaco Pkwy & Lowry Blvd Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS D D B B A A Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS D B A Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 16.1 HCM 2010 Level of Service B R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
28 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 3: Monaco Pkwy & 1st Ave Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS D D D E A B C A A Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS D E B B Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 20.0 HCM 2010 Level of Service B R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
29 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 4: Quebec St & Alameda Ave Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS F D C C D C E E E F D D Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS E D E E Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 57.5 HCM 2010 Level of Service E R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
30 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 5: Quebec St & Lowry Blvd Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS D E D D E D B A A B A A Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS D D A A Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 19.9 HCM 2010 Level of Service B R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
31 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 6: Quebec St & 1st Ave Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS D D D D D B A A A B B Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS D D A B Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 15.0 HCM 2010 Level of Service B R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
32 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Buckley Annex GDP 2030 AM Total w/ Updated Volumes 7: Pontiac St & Lowry Blvd Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Number Initial Queue, veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking, Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow Rate Lanes Capacity, veh/h Arriving On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Proportion In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh Movement LOS A A A A A C C C C Approach Volume, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS A A C C Timer Assigned Phase Phase Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Extension Time (p_c) Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Control Delay 7.3 HCM 2010 Level of Service A R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030AM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
33 Timings Buckley Annex GDP 2030 PM Total w/ Updated Volumes 1: Monaco Pkwy & Alameda Ave Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 7.5% 34.2% 10.0% 36.7% 36.7% 9.2% 35.0% 20.8% 46.7% 46.7% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min C-Min None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 62 (52%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Monaco Pkwy & Alameda Ave R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030PM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
34 Timings Buckley Annex GDP 2030 PM Total w/ Updated Volumes 2: Monaco Pkwy & Lowry Blvd Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 30.8% 30.8% 50.0% 50.0% 19.2% 69.2% Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 11 (9%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: Monaco Pkwy & Lowry Blvd R:\ Buckley Annex GDP\Traffic\Synchro\Buckley Annex 2030PM.syn Appendix B - Synchro 8 Report Matrix Design Group 7/24/2012
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationAldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
More informationJOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse
More informationTraffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795
More informationAddendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433
More informationWinnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationMEMORANDUM. Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
MEMORANDUM Date: May 26, 2016 To: From: Subject: Debbie Bent and Kris Overleese, City of Kenmore Kendra Breiland and Sarah Keenan, Fehr & Peers Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
More informationMEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February
More informationTraffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Route 4 (Farmington Avenue) Farmington, Connecticut Prepared for: The Town of Farmington, CT Prepared By: BL Companies Meriden, Connecticut December 2016
More informationSR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited
More informationAppendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations
Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Emission Reduction
More informationRe: Cyrville Road Car Dealership
1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com February 25, 2013 OUR REF: TO3098TOE Mark Motors of Ottawa 611 Montreal Road Ottawa, ON K1K 0T8 Attention:
More informationRe: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview
1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com March 28, 2012 OUR REF: TO3088TOY Barry J. Hobin & Architects 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, ON K1S 3K7
More information1 st Street Intersection Study
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1 st Street Intersection Study Prepared for: City of Independence In Cooperation With: Iowa Department of Transportation & Iowa Department of Public Safety Governor
More informationAPPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description (Used for surface streets,
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,
More informationFinal Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)
Market Street Road Diet Wilmington, NC 2016 Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Wilmington, NC Parsons Brinckerhoff January 2016 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT US 17 Corridor
More informationARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt
More informationAPPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets
APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
More informationBennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Update
Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
More informationTable 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1
Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:
More informationLOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More information886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC
MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification
More informationProvide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;
December 19, 2013 File: 163600935 Attention: Troy Elliott Carl Elliott Limited 15-1831 Robertson Road PO Box 11117 Nepean, Ontario K1H 7T8 Dear Mr. Elliott, Reference: 2235 and 2265 Robertson Road Transportation
More informationKUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266
KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721
More informationWeaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37
More informationJune 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,
More informationL1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: James Terlizzi, P.E., Transportation Planning Engineer DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Further analysis of the recommendations
More informationDate: December 20, Project #:
To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long
More informationAPPENDIX G. Traffic Data
APPENDIX G Traffic Data HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Duanesburg Road & I-88 Ramps 10/7/2004 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl)
More informationOakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna
More informationPrescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT TIA Report.docx
Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT 11897-05 TIA Report.docx Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis This page is intentionally left blank 11897-05
More information10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018
More informationOne Harbor Point Residential
Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE
More informationRESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM
More informationLATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department
More information1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace
December 217 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Lépine Corporation 32 March Road Kanata, ON K2K 2E3 prepared by: 1223
More informationSweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic
More informationWellington Street West
Transportation Brief prepared for: 185 Davenport Road Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5R 1J1 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 November 5, 2013 TO3131TOH Transportation Brief November
More informationRef. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th
Ref. No. 151-00564 Task 3 April 28, 2015 Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th 3480 Joseph Howe Drive, 5 Floor HALIFAX NS B3L 4H7 Sent via Email to ceasr.saleh@wmfares.com
More informationTRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT US 460 Bypass Interchange and Southgate Drive Relocation State Project No.: 0460-150-204, P101, R201, C501, B601; UPC 99425
More informationHONDA DEALERSHIP LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA. Prepared by:
LOS ANGELES 21 S. Figueroa St, Suite 24 Los Angeles, CA 912 213.337.368 Fax :213.337.3679 ONTARIO 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 25 Ontario, CA 91764 99.481.575 Fax :99.481.5757 SAN DIEGO 6 B St, Suite
More informationSugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:
More informationVillage of Richmond Transportation Brief
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800
More informationDIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. Project Description...3 3. Existing Conditions...3 4. Forecast Traffic Demand and Analysis...12 5. Conclusions and
More informationMURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and
More informationProposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,
More informationTraffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road
More informationBarrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief
Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152
More informationJMC. November 7, Chairman John P. Ewasutyn and Members of the Planning Board Town of Newburgh Town Hall 308 Gardnertown Road Newburgh, NY 12550
JMC JOHN MEYER CONSULTING, PC Site Planning n Civil Engineering n Landscape Architecture Land Surveying n Transportation Engineering n Environmental Studies n Permitting n Construction Services November
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers
Traffic Impact Study For Eastern Springs A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY April 2018 Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Table of Contents 1) Executive Summary... 2 2) Study Purpose...
More informationTraffic Impact Statement (TIS)
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205
More informationSUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. May 9, 2016
May 9, 2016 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. 215 North 5 th Street Redlands, CA 92374 SUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos:
More informationApril Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief
April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.
More informationRockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality
Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Study Final Draft Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T
More informationPaisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use
Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use Transportation Impact Study City of Guelph Prepared for: Armel Corporation August 2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED
More informationFORT MYERS CITY COUNCIL OSCAR M. CORBIN, JR. CITY HALL, 2200 SECOND STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA
Agenda City Council Special Mee ng March 18, 2019 1:00 PM Historic Preserva on Commission Appeal - Virginia Avenue/ McGregor Boulevard Roundabout MAYOR Randall P. Henderson, Jr. Ward 1 Teresa Watkins Brown
More informationTraffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...
More informationDowntown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report
Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current
More informationJRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3
March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING
More information700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:
700 Hunt Club Road Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1 Submitted by: 14 June 2013 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com 14 June 2013
More informationAPPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix
More information1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief
1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief October 2013 Study 1140 Wellington Type Street West October 2013 Study Transportation Name Brief February 2011 TB Check List TIS / TB/ CTS Check List prepared
More informationHCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009
6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) 116 20 8 405 137 56 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow
More informationAppendix B: Traffic Reports
Appendix B: Traffic Reports 407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION Report Markham Road Station Traffic Study Prepared for Ministry of Transportation, Ontario
More informationMEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (95)823-85 Fax: (95) 823-853 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: FROM: File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah
More informationCounty State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Project Description... 1 Estimated Daily Project Traffic... 3 Estimated
More informationKing Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado
Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company
More informationWellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID
Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 5731 Hazeldean Road Transportation Impact Study Ottawa, Ontario Project ID 160401195 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 2016 WELLINGS
More informationCritical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B
Memorandum DATE: AUGUST 1, 2013 TO: PAUL TILTON, P.E., SANDWICH DPW DIRECTOR/TOWN ENGINEER FROM: LEV MALAKHOFF, SR. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER RE: ROUTE 130/QUAKER MEETINGHOUSE ROAD INTERSECTION Paul: Per
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis
More informationMEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:
MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed
More information(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals
February 14th, 2014 BY E-MAIL: wally.dubyk@ottawa.ca City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Attention: Wally Dubyk, C.E.T (A) Project
More information267 O Connor Street Residential Development
M a y 2014 267 O Connor Street Residential Development Transportation Brief Google 2014 Bing 2014 Prepared for: MASTERCRAFT STARWOOD Prepared by: Study 267 O'Connor Type Street May 2014 Study Residential
More informationZachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment
MEMORANDUM Date: June 22, 2018 Project #: 21562 To: Colin McArthur, AICP From: Project: Subject: Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit
More informationFreeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis Along IH 27 at Plainview, TX Hao Xu, Jared A. Squyres, Wesley Kumfer, and Hongchao Liu 7/15/2011 Table of Contents Project Description...
More informationMEMORANDUM November 19, 2012
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL NAUGATUCK VALLEY 60 NORTH MAIN ST 3RD Floor WATERBURY, CT 06702-1403 (203)757-0535 Web Site: www.cogcnv.org E-Mail: cogcnv@cogcnv.org November 19, 2012 MEMORANDUM 111912
More informationINTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
More informationINTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road
More informationSalvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017
Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A7 519-591-0426 November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017 Laurie Wills, PEng Deputy Director of Public Works Town of Cobourg 740 Division
More informationCraig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022
More informationIngraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis
Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,
More informationRe: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario
April 18 th, 2017 Mr. Kevin Yemm Vice President, Land Development Richraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario (Tel: 613.739.7111 / e-mail: keviny@richcraft.com) Re:
More information2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017
Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.
More informationMemorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee
To Copies James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee Date August 26, 2016 Reference number 243381 From Mike Iswalt, Vanessa Peers, Will Baumgardner File reference 4-05 Subject Lafayette
More informationPrepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE TTC MCNICOLL BUS GARAGE CITY OF TORONTO Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2 Prepared By: Canada Inc. 4th Floor, 3 Leek Crescent
More informationLakeside Terrace Development
Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.
More informationParking/Traffic Assessment Study
Brock Road Industrial Mall 985 Brock Road South City of Pickering Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Prepared by: Tranplan Associates, Toronto Toronto 416-670-2005 Sudbury 705-522-0272 Peterborough 705-874-3638
More informationQuantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:
6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration
More informationMEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012
BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (617) 973-7100 Fax (617) 973-8855 TTY (617) 973-7089 www.bostonmpo.org
More informationLAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More information