Community Planning Process

Transcription

1

2 Community Planning Process ZONING DISTRICTS COMMUNITY INPUT GOALS LAND USE DISCUSSION ZONING OPTIONS (MAPS) WORKSHOPS MEETINGS LETTERS REPORTS BROAD LAND USE ISSUES LAND USE ANALYSIS

3 Community Planning Process

4 Community Goals! Create housing opportunities, especially affordable, family housing! Retain PDR jobs and businesses! Strengthen existing neighborhood commercial districts! Allow areas where light PDR is combined with residential uses! Find appropriate locations for cultural centers, community facilities, and nighttime entertainment! Minimize land use conflicts

5 Rezoning Task in the Eastern Neighborhoods

6 Eastern Neighborhoods South of Market Mission Showplace Square/ Potrero Hill Visitacion Valley Bayview Hunters Point

7 Contents 1 Citywide Land Use Context 2 New Zoning Designations 3 Spectrum of Zoning Options " Bayview Hunters Point " Showplace Square Potrero Hill " Mission " South of Market

8 The Citywide Land Use Context! Housing! PDR Jobs! Forecast

9 Housing as a Priority! Housing Element! Citywide Action Plan! Better Neighborhoods! New Downtown Neighborhoods! Eastern Neighborhoods

10 Land Supply for Housing 10,000 units: REST OF THE CITY (yellow) 22,000 units: DOWNTOWN / MISSION BAY (aqua) 16,000 units: BETTER NEIGHBORHOODS (red) 30,000 units: EASTERN NEIGHBORHOODS (pink)

11 Production, Distribution, and Repair (PDR): Use of Space Office PDR Heavy Industrial/ Maritime! LIGHT! MEDIUM! CORE

12 Production, Distribution, and Repair: Use of Space! LIGHT! Graphic design! Auto repair! Small catering services! Small radio stations

13 Production, Distribution, and Repair: Use of Space! MEDIUM! Printers and publishers! Furniture showrooms! Film production

14 Production, Distribution, and Repair: Use of Space! CORE! Small trucking operations! Food processing! Suppliers of construction materials! Large publishing operations

15 PDR Land Needed/ Land Available Land Occupied by PDR: 1150 acres 53,000 jobs Land Available under IPZ: 800 acres 39,000 jobs

16 Forecast Planning Department ABAG Forecast Growth Forecast Available space Households 20,000 30,000 66,000-78,000 (units) Jobs 135, ,000 ñ 126, , ,000 (jobs)

17 Development Potential and Forecast Expansion of Existing Residential Neighborhoods

18 Development Potential and Forecast Selected Residential Neighborhoods in Industrial Land

19 Development Potential and Forecast Expansion of Existing Residential Neighborhoods

20 Land Available for PDR 1650 acres

21 Land Available for PDR 800 acres

22 Land Available for PDR 650 acres

23 Land Available for PDR 550 acres

24 Housing and PDR Development Potential HOUSING UNITS PDR JOBS

25 New Zoning Designations

26 New Zoning Designations Single Use PDR Mixed with Commercial Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR

27 Single Use: Maritime/Heavy Industrial Residential- Low Density Residential- Enclave District Residential- Medium Density Residential Transit Oriented

28 PDR Mixed with Commercial: Light PDR PDR/Medium Commercial PDR Large Commercial Core PDR

29 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR: Residential PDR Residential Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Moderate Scale Neighborhood Commercial Transit

30 Single Use: Maritime / Heavy Industrial

31 Single Use: Maritime / Heavy Industrial Open Yard

32 Single Use: Residential Enclave District

33 Single Use: Residential Enclave District Housing Housing Main Street Alley Main Street

34 PDR Mixed with Commercial: Core PDR

35 PDR Mixed with Commercial: Core PDR PDR Office/ Store Open Yard Loading PDR

36 PDR Mixed with Commercial: PDR / Large Commercial

37 PDR Mixed with Commercial: PDR / Large Commercial Store/ Mall PDR Store/ Mall Parking Loading

38 PDR Mixed with Commercial: PDR / Medium Commercial

39 PDR Mixed with Commercial: PDR / Medium Commercial PDR Store Loading Street

40 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR : Neighborhood Commercial Transit

41 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR : Neighborhood Commercial Transit Housing Office Housing Retail Retail Street

42 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR : Residential - PDR

43 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR : Residential - PDR Housing PDR Housing PDR Loading Parking Loading

44 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR : Residential/Commercial

45 Residential Mixed with Commercial and PDR : Residential/Commercial Housing Housing Retail/ Office Street

46 Spectrum of Zoning Options

47 Spectrum of Options Housing Production in Industrial Land Existing Conditions Major Change A B C LOW HOUSING MODERATE HOUSING HIGH HOUSING

48 Housing Development Potential 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 BVHP SoMa Mission Showplace

49 Office / Retail Job Growth Potential 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 BVHP SoMa Mission Showplace

50 PDR Jobs: Growth Potential 4,000 2, ,000-4,000-6,000-8,000-10,000 BVHP SoMa Mission Showplace

51 Bayview Hunters Point

52 26TH IOWA PENNSYLVANIA MISSISSIPPI CESAR CHAVEZ NAPOLEON CUSTER EVANS NEWHALL SELBY INNES JERROLD PALOU LANE PHELPS BAY SHORE FAIRFAX LOOMIS KEITH QUINT ELMIRA HELENA MARIN KANSAS EVE SELBY BURKE INNES KIRKWOOD BARNEVELD BRIDGEVIEW MADDUX CHARTER OAK SILVER BOUTWELL TOPEKA FITCH KISKA APOLLO EARL JENNINGS MIDDLE POINT REUEL DEDMAN APPAREL QUESADA WILLS HARE QUESADA SANTA FE BAY VIEW OSCEOLA REARDON LUCY NAVY OAKDALE MARLIN CRISP HAWES YOSEMITE REVERE SHAFTER EGBERT 03RD PAUL CRANE FITZGERALD GILMAN SALINAS CAMERON NICHOLS KEY MEADE GILROY HUNTERS POINT DUKES LINDSAY FAIRFAX INNES MARIST COMMER ISSLEIB GRIFFITH BAYVIEW PARK GILLETTE BLANKEN DONAHUE REDONDO KEITH NEWHALL DONNER BURKE KEITH FITCH EARL DONAHUE HAWES KEY BANCROFT EVANS ELMIRA BAY SHORE GRIFFITH JAMESTOWN ALANA CORTLAND. Bayview Hunters Point: Low Housing Option

53 26TH IOWA PENNSYLVANIA MISSISSIPPI CESAR CHAVEZ MARIN KANSAS EVE SELBY NAPOLEON CUSTER BURKE EVANS INNES KIRKWOOD BARNEVELD NEWHALL SELBY JERROLD PALOU LANE PHELPS BAY SHORE APPAREL INNES FAIRFAX LOOMIS KEITH QUINT ELMIRA HELENA BRIDGEVIEW MADDUX CHARTER OAK SILVER BOUTWELL TOPEKA FITCH KISKA APOLLO NAVY EARL JENNINGS QUESADA MIDDLE POINT REUEL DEDMAN WILLS LINDSAY HARE QUESADA SANTA FE MARIST COMMER BAY VIEW OSCEOLA LUCY REARDON OAKDALE CRISP HAWES REVERE SHAFTER ISSLEIB MARLIN YOSEMITE EGBERT 03RD BANCROFT CAMERON PAUL CRANE FITZGERALD SALINAS NICHOLS GILMAN KEY MEADE GILROY HUNTERS POINT DUKES FAIRFAX INNES GRIFFITH BAYVIEW PARK GILLETTE BLANKEN DONAHUE REDONDO KEITH NEWHALL DONNER BURKE KEITH FITCH EARL DONAHUE HAWES KEY EVANS ELMIRA BAY SHORE GRIFFITH JAMESTOWN ALANA Bayview Hunters Point: Moderate Housing Option CORTLAND

54 IOWA PENNSYLVANIA MISSISSIPPI 26TH CESAR CHAVEZ MARIN KANSAS EVE NAPOLEON BARNEVELD SELBY BURKE CUSTER EVANS LANE KEITH PHELPS NEWHALL BAY SHORE INNES FAIRFAX LOOMIS KEITH ELMIRA HELENA BRIDGEVIEW MADDUX SILVER CHARTER OAK BOUTWELL TOPEKA PALOU HAWES FITCH EARL JENNINGS INNES JERROLD KIRKWOOD MIDDLE POINT REUEL DEDMAN APPAREL QUESADA WILLS LINDSAY HARE QUESADA SANTA FE MARIST BAY VIEW COMMER OSCEOLA KISKA APOLLO LUCY REARDON NAVY YOSEMITE REVERE SHAFTER BANCROFT EGBERT 03RD PAUL FITZGERALD GILMAN KEY OAKDALE ISSLEIB MARLIN CRISP CRANE SALINAS CAMERON NICHOLS MEADE GILROY HUNTERS POINT DUKES DONNER EVANS FAIRFAX KEITH GRIFFITH FITCH BAYVIEW PARK GILLETTE BLANKEN DONAHUE REDONDO GRIFFITH SELBY QUINT NEWHALL KEY BURKE EARL DONAHUE HAWES INNES ELMIRA BAY SHORE JAMESTOWN ALANA CORTLAND Bayview Hunters Point: High Housing Option

55 Showplace Square/ Potrero Hill

56 HUBBELL DAGGETT IRWIN 07TH TEXAS MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI CONNECTICUT ARKANSAS SIERRA 22ND I-280 S OFF PENNSYLVANIA TURNER WATCHMAN TEXAS DAKOTA CONNECTICUT 07TH KING BERRY CHANNEL HOOPER Townsend Street DIVISION 15TH 16TH 17TH HENRY ADAMS DE HARO RHODE ISLAND MARIPOSA 18TH 19TH 20TH KANSAS WISCONSIN 22ND MADERA 25TH 08TH CAROLINA WISCONSIN SOUTHERN HEIGHTS VERMONT CAROLINA HUMBOLDT 23RD 24TH CORAL CAIRE 25TH LITTLEFIELD BLAIR 26TH Bryant Street Brannan Street 08TH 09TH DORE 10TH SAN BRUNO SAN BRUNO UTAH POTRERO 21ST SAN BRUNO UTAH Showplace Square/ Potrero Hill: Low Housing Option

57 22ND I-280 S OFF PENNSYLVANIA 25TH HUBBELL IRWIN DAGGETT 07TH TEXAS MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI CONNECTICUT ARKANSAS SIERRA TURNER WATCHMAN MADERA TEXAS DAKOTA CONNECTICUT 07TH KING BERRY CHANNEL HOOPER Townsend Street DIVISION HENRY ADAMS 16TH 17TH DE HARO RHODE ISLAND 15TH 08TH CAROLINA WISCONSIN MARIPOSA 18TH 19TH 20TH SOUTHERN HEIGHTS 22ND KANSAS VERMONT WISCONSIN CAROLINA HUMBOLDT 23RD 24TH CORAL CAIRE 25TH LITTLEFIELD BLAIR 26TH Bryant Street Brannan Street 08TH 09TH DORE 10TH SAN BRUNO SAN BRUNO UTAH POTRERO 21ST SAN BRUNO UTAH Showplace Square/ Potrero Hill: Moderate Housing Option

58 22ND I-280 S OFF PENNSYLVANIA 25TH IRWIN HUBBELL DAGGETT 07TH MISSISSIPPI TEXAS MISSOURI CONNECTICUT ARKANSAS SIERRA TURNER WATCHMAN MADERA TEXAS DAKOTA CONNECTICUT 07TH KING BERRY CHANNEL HOOPER Townsend Street 16TH 17TH CAROLINA DE HARO RHODE ISLAND 15TH DIVISION HENRY ADAMS 08TH WISCONSIN MARIPOSA 18TH 19TH 20TH SOUTHERN HEIGHTS 22ND HUMBOLDT KANSAS VERMONT WISCONSIN CAROLINA 23RD 24TH CORAL CAIRE 25TH LITTLEFIELD BLAIR 26TH Bryant Street Brannan Street 08TH 09TH DORE 10TH SAN BRUNO SAN BRUNO UTAH POTRERO 21ST SAN BRUNO UTAH Showplace Square/ Potrero Hill: High Housing Option

59 Mission

60 MARIPOSA 18TH HAMPSHIRE YORK BRYANT 21ST DIVISION 15TH ALABAMA 19TH MISTRAL FLORIDA ALABAMA HARRISON 22ND 23RD 24TH BALMY 25TH 16TH 26TH 14TH 15TH TREAT 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH TREAT LUCKY FOLSOM ERIE SHOTWELL SOUTH VAN NESS VIRGIL CYPRESS ADAIR CAPP LILAC WOODWARD STEVENSON CLINTON MINNA Mission: Low Housing Option # WIESE JULIAN CALEDONIA ALBION HOFF RONDEL CLARION DEARBORN LAPIDGE MISSION SAN CARLOS LEXINGTON VALENCIA LINDA # OSAGE BARTLETT ORANGE SAN JOSE JURI

61 # # CAPP BRYANT 17TH FOLSOM YORK 16TH MISSION 26TH 24TH 25TH 21ST FLORIDA 23RD 20TH 22ND VALENCIA HARRISON SHOTWELL 19TH 18TH 14TH HAMPSHIRE ALABAMA SOUTH VAN NESS TREAT BARTLETT SAN JOSE LILAC OSAGE LUCKY LINDA JULIAN SAN CARLOS ORANGE ERIE MARIPOSA CYPRESS HOFF MINNA VIRGIL BALMY ALBION CALEDONIA CLARION LAPIDGE RONDEL DEARBORN ADAIR WOODWARD JURI MISTRAL STEVENSON CLINTON DIVISION ALABAMA 18TH 15TH TREAT 19TH 15TH WIESE LEXINGTON Mission: Moderate Housing Option

62 # # CAPP BRYANT 17TH FOLSOM YORK 16TH MISSION 26TH 24TH 25TH 21ST FLORIDA 23RD 20TH 22ND VALENCIA HARRISON SHOTWELL 19TH 18TH 14TH HAMPSHIRE ALABAMA SOUTH VAN NESS TREAT BARTLETT SAN JOSE LILAC OSAGE LUCKY LINDA JULIAN SAN CARLOS ORANGE ERIE MARIPOSA CYPRESS HOFF MINNA VIRGIL BALMY ALBION CALEDONIA CLARION LAPIDGE RONDEL DEARBORN ADAIR WOODWARD JURI MISTRAL STEVENSON CLINTON DIVISION ALABAMA 18TH 15TH TREAT 19TH 15TH WIESE LEXINGTON Mission: High Housing Option

63 South of Market

64 Beale Street 1st Street 2nd Street 3rd Street 4th Street 5th Street 6th Street SoMa: South of Market: Low Option Housing A Option BALLPARK Townsend Street Bryant Street Brannan Street Mission Street Howard Street 7th Street Folsom Street 8th Street Harrison Street 9th Street 10th Street 11th Street 12th Street ERIE DIVISION

65 Beale Street 1st Street 2nd Street 3rd Street 4th Street 5th Street SoMa: South of Market: Moderate Option B Housing Option BALLPARK Townsend Street Brannan Street 6th Street Mission Street Howard Street 7th Street Folsom Street 9th Street 10th Street 11th Street 8th Street Harrison Street Bryant Street 12th Street ERIE DIVISION

66 Beale Street 1st Street 2nd Street 3rd Street 4th Street 5th Street SoMa: South of Market: High Option Housing C Option BALLPARK Townsend Street Brannan Street 6th Street Mission Street Howard Street 7th Street Folsom Street 9th Street 10th Street 11th Street 8th Street Harrison Street Bryant Street 12th Street ERIE DIVISION

67 Urban Form Analysis

68 Eastern Neighborhoods Urban Form

69 Eastern Neighborhoods: Composite

70 Eastern Neighborhoods : Low Housing Option

71 Eastern Neighborhoods : Moderate Housing Option

72 Eastern Neighborhoods : High Housing Option

73 Next Steps

74 Next Steps 1. Is PDR relevant and valuable to the city now and in the future? 2. Is the amount of land officially documented as available for PDR sufficient for that future role?

75 Next Steps 3. Should we and can we build more than 3000 units of housing a year, 2/3 below market, by opening up land now zoned for PDR and significantly reducing PDR jobs in the future? 4. Should we build in the transit corridors and near downtown where there is infrastructure present and where communities can be strengthened so that they can accommodate the necessary housing and keep the current PDR jobs and space for the future jobs?

76 Thank You!