Aarne Rentik, MSc Chief Executive, Union of Municipalities Andres Harjo Tallinn City Government

Transcription

1 Aarne Rentik, MSc Chief Executive, Union of Municipalities Andres Harjo Tallinn City Government

2 1. Location and what s in 2. What we have to do (the vision) 3. Environment & health the main goals of mobility strategy 4. Crossing a chasm by...

3

4

5 Expected: Actual results: Expected: Dominated trend is suburbanisation to private houses. New development of private houses will move to farther zones. t 1 real estate development from the year of 1990 t 2 development from 2000 Actual results: Suburban areas densifying and still quite near to capital.

6 Share of commuters to Tallinn, from the Ahas (2007) study using the mobile positioning method Source: Ahas et al. 2007

7 Share, % Figure: Share of fieldwillages among the households of new urban areas (Survey of new urban areas 2006, University of Tartu)

8 In the year 2035 Tallinn is a pleasant, healthy and livable urban environment with safe and diverse acessibility to goods and services in a policentric urban region. The management of land use and different modes of transport are integrated and transport use is resource and energy efficient

9 OBJECTIVE ACTIVITY Economic developme nt Low level of congestio n and efficient transport system OBJECTIVE Economic developme nt Low level of congestio sustainabl y and equal and environme livability Field of activity n and e opportuniti security nt Objective Scenario feasibility city to the objectives region Grade city efficient transport es transport modes Development ACTIVITY in PT corridors Objectives Economic development system 2,0 3,5 4,5 Avoiding urban 50,00sprawl 0,0 5,0 21,7 Low level of congestion and Car free zones Development efficient transport 1,0 system 3,5 32,4 in PT corridors 1,0 3,0 2,7 3,0 2,0 1,7 2,3 Diverse Health, Air quality Urban share of accessibilit safety and space and Green network Avoiding 1,0 3,0 4,5 sustainablhigh y and equal and share environme livability of sustainable transport urban sprawl modes 8,07 0,7 3,0 2,7 2,0 1,5 2,3 4 e opportuniti security nt 2,3 transport es Park & Ride 40,00 1,0 2,4 0,7 modes Car free zones 0,3 1,0 9,07 2,3 1,3 1,7 1,7 2,7 Diverse accessibility and equal Green network opportunities 0,3 0,7 1,3 1,0 2,3 2,3 5 3,0 Sprawling Polycentric Compact PT infrastructure 2,0 3,5 4,5 city region city Park & Ride 0,7 1,2 1,0 1,0 0,7 0,7 0,7 Health, safety and security Light traffic infrastructure 2,0 PT 9,14 5,0 54,0 2,0 3,5 4,5 infrastructure 1,3 2,3 2,3 2,7 1,3 2,0 2,3 0,0 5,0 1,7 Traffic calming 7,08 0,5 4,5 3,0 Light 30,00 traffic Air quality and 1,0 environment 3,5 2,4 0,5 2,0 2,7 3,0 3,0 2,7 5 Car infrastructure 5,0 1,2 Heavy infrastr 2,43,0 1,0 3,0 4,5 Traffic Urban space and 1,0 livability 2,4 0,7 Port calming 0,0 1,7 7,05 1,7 4,0 7,47 1,7 3,0 1,0 Pricing 1,2 52,02,7 Development in PT corridors 1,0 3,0 2,7 3,0 2,0 1,7 2,3 Avoiding urban sprawl 0,7 3,0 2,7 2,0 1,5 2,3 2,3 Car free zones 0,3 1,0 2,3 1,3 1,7 1,7 2,7 Green network 0,3 0,7 1,3 1,0 2,3 2,3 3,0 Park & Ride 0,7 1,2 1,0 1,0 0,7 0,7 0,7 PT infrastructure 1,3 2,3 2,3 2,7 1,3 2,0 2,3 Light traffic infrastructure 0,5 2,0 2,7 3,0 3,0 2,7 3,0 Traffic calming 0,0 1,7 1,7 1,7 3,0 1,2 2,7 Car infrastructure 1,0 0,0-2,7-1,7-1,7-2,7-2,7 Port 3,0-1,0-1,0-1,3-1,0-1,0-1,3 Rail 2,0 0,7 0,3-0,7-1,7-1,3-1,7 Plane 1,3 0,0-1,0-0,7-1,3-2,0-1,7 Urban PT 1,0 3,0 3,0 2,7 2,0 2,0 2,3 Regional PT 1,0 3,0 2,7 3,0 2,0 1,3 1,3 Integrated planning 1,3 1,7 2,3 2,3 2,3 1,7 2,7 Traffic management 0,7 2,7 2,3 1,3 1,7 1,0 2,3 Least cost planning 2,0 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,0 2,7 City logistics 1,7 1,3 0,7 0,7 1,3 1,3 1,3 Parking norms 0,3 2,0 2,3 1,3 2,0 1,3 2,3 Mobility management 0,7 2,3 2,3 2,3 1,7 2,0 2,3 Charging 0,7 3,0 3,0 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 Subsidizing 0,3 2,3 2,7 2,3 2,3 2,3 2,3 2,0 3,5 4,5 2,0 5,0 4,0 0,5 4,5 3,0 5,0 1,2 2,4 4,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 1,0 2,0 4,0 1,0 2,4 3,0 4,0 5,0 0,5 1,4 5,0 0,5 3,5 5,0 2,0 4,0 3,5 0,0 3,5 3,9 0,0 2,4 2,0 4,0 4,5 4,0 1,0 3,5 4,5 1,0 5,0 2,4 3,0 3,0 5,0 High share of Diverse accessibilit Sprawling Health, safety Polycentric Air quality and Urban space and Compact Mob. mgmnt Rail 3,0 1,0 2,0 Car infrastructure 1,0 0,0-2,7-1,7-1,7-2,7-2,7 20,00 Administrative Port 3,0-1,0-1,0-1,3-1,0-1,0-1,3 5,80 Rail 2,0 0,7 0,3 10,41-0,7-1,7 PT development -1,3-1,7 Plane 1,3 0,0-1,0-0,7-1,3-2,0-1,7 Urban PT 4,28 1,0 3,0 3,0 2,7 2,0 2,0 2,3 Regional PT 1,0 3,0 6,50 Land usage 2,7 3,0 2,0 1,3 1,3 10,00 2,04 Integrated 4,06 planning 2,42 1,3 1,7 2,3 2,3 2,3 1,7 2,7 Traffic 3,81 management 0,7 2,7 8,31 2,3 1,3 1,7 1,0 2,3 0,77 7,26 Least cost 2,25 planning 0,00 2,0 2,7-0,31 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,0 2,7-1,28 City logistics -4,20 1,7 1,3 0,7 0,7 1,3 1,3 1,3 Parking norms 0,3 2,0 2,3 1,3 2,0 1,3 2,3 Mobility Sprawling city Compact city Polycentric region management 0,7 2,3 2,3 2,3 1,7 2,0 2,3 Charging -10,00 0,7 3,0 3,0 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 Subsidizing 0,3 2,3 2,7 2,3 2,3 2,3 2,3 Plane 4,0 1,0 2,4 Urban PT 3,0 4,0 Sustainable 5,0 infrastr Regional PT 0,5 1,4 5,0 Integrated planning 0,5 3,5 5,0 Traffic management 2,0 4,0 3,5 Least cost planning 0,0 3,5 3,9 Urban logistics 0,0 2,4 2,0 Parking norms 4,0 4,5 4,0 Mobility management 1,0 3,5 4,5 Charging 1,0 5,0 2,4 Subsidizing 3,0 3,0 5,0

10 As pioneers we must be prepared to cross the chasm! Not all of us want to use active transport modes in everyday life

11

12 12 Mover groups Heavy car users Car users People who mix all modes Regular customers of public transport People who prefer walking or cycling Some ideas how to affect Arguments concerning own health and positive impact of walking and cycling Level of service, image and user-friendliness of public transportation, motivation Urban structure, level of service and price of public transportation, motivation Urban structure, level of service of public transportation Urban structure and services near the homes Source: Finnish Road Administration

13 Lines Corridors Sectors Areas Linienbetrieb Richtungsbandbetrieb Sektorbetrieb Flächenbetrieb traffic demand Bündelung der Verkehrsnachfrage source: TU Munich fest gefahrene Strecke nur bei Bedarf gefahrene Strecke mögliche Fahrtroute fest bediente Haltestelle nur bei Bedarf bediente Haltestelle

14 Traditional taxi services Individual transport TIMETABLE Flexibility DRTS (Demand Responsive Transport Service) =>Dispatch Centers =>Computer-aided planning =>Based on combining publicfunded transport services =>Utilizes primarily trunk routes Service routes =>Minibuses -> basically regular service ->passenger can ask pickup from home or nearest bustops More flexible/active route services -> diversions from routes possible (e.g. to hospitals) Traditional route services Flexibility ROUTE

15 air pollution; climate change; noise; accidents; soil and water pollution; congestion. = EXTERNAL COSTS FOR SOCIETY

16

17 S0 CAR & BUS; S2 DIESEL TRAINS; S3 ELECTRIC TRAINS = 3,4 to 4,4 (thousand departures)

18 THANK YOU!