Production and ownership of the report rests with Assistant Chief Constable Steph Morgan, to whom any queries may be addressed.

Transcription

1 This document is a quarterly monitoring report regarding the use of police stop and search powers in the Leicestershire Constabulary area under Section 1 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Section 23 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and Section 47 of the Firearms Act The monitoring report covers the period 1 October 2011 to 31 December The report also contains data for the first three quarters of 2011 as well as cumulative data for quarters one, two, three and of It is the fourth in a series of quarterly monitoring reports that are required in accordance with an agreement made between Leicestershire Constabulary and the Equalities and Human Rights Commission pursuant to Section 23 of the Equality Act The agreement between the parties commenced on 14 th April 2011 and is due for review in September This report will be shared with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, Leicestershire Police Authority, the Stop Search Reference Group and the Police Advisory Group on Race and Equality (PAGRE). The report will be disseminated to other key stakeholders inside and outside the organisation. Production and ownership of the report rests with Assistant Chief Constable Steph Morgan, to whom any queries may be addressed. Steph Morgan 1 st April 2012 Assistant Chief Constable Leicestershire Police HQ St John s, Enderby Leicester, LE19 2BX - 1 -

2 Actions to be taken by Leicestershire Constabulary 1. To specify in writing in a policy statement the criteria that are to be used in all cases by all officers of Leicestershire Constabulary in exercising S and S powers that conform precisely to an up- to- date Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Code of Practice A This policy is made clear in all communications to staff and is explored in detail during stop search training which is being rolled out to all front line staff, managers, supervisors and intelligence staff. The Stop Search Reference Group has provided some guidance as to the contents of a force policy and procedure and is considering policy options. This process has been delayed due to recent changes made to process and practice. 2. To include in such a policy the adoption of a specific formal aim of reducing race disproportionately in the use of stop and search Reducing race disproportionality will be included as a formal aim within the revised force policy on stop search and in the interim is an aim that is monitored by the force s Executive Group. This aim is also included in the terms of reference of the Stop Search Reference Group, which the force supports. 3. To set and work towards achieving the following targets:- The number of searches per 1000 Black people for every search per 1000 White people should not exceed 3.1 These aims have been agreed with Leicestershire Constabulary and are being measured in accordance with the terms of this agreement. The number of searches per 1000 Asian people for every search per 1000 White people should not exceed 1.0 These are to be measured by self-defined ethnicity using stop and searches of persons under stop and search powers. The calculation will exclude those who self define their ethnicity as: White and Black Caribbean White and Black African White and Asian The population data to be used is the 2011 Census, or if these are not available the Population Estimates by Ethnic Group as published by the Office for National Statistics. 4. To designate an ACPO rank officer to be responsible for the force seeking to achieve the target agreed or set in accordance with point 3 above. Assistant Chief Constable Steph Morgan is the nominated ACPO officer responsible for the force seeking to achieve the targets agreed in point 3 above

3 5. To monitor every three months the use of S and S powers within the area of Leicestershire Constabulary, subject to any changes in legislation designed to reduce bureaucracy, and to analyse the product of that monitoring by:- Monitoring is in place and quarterly analysis commenced for the period 1 January 2011 to 31 March See pages 6-22 for data tables relating the period Q4-1 October 2011 to 31 December Reasons given for each such use, Reference to the specific location, The time of day, The gender and ethnicity of the officer using the power, The gender and ethnicity of the person who is stopped or whose vehicle is stopped, What was found, Whether any arrest followed as a direct result of the use of S and S power, and (if so) the class of criminal activity to which the arrest related, Comparison with the gender and ethnicity of the persons arrested (without use of such powers) in the same area over the same period, and Identifying all and any disproportionality in the use of the S and S powers over such period, and taking reasonable steps to identify the causes of such disproportionally. Following a meeting with Phil Pavey, EHRC it has been agreed to provide aggregate data on a cumulative basis to build 4 quarters of data so the aforementioned tables now includes cumulative data for Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 of To record centrally all complaints (within the meaning of section 12 of the Police Reform Act 2002,) about the use of such S and S powers whether made orally or in writing or by electronic means and to follow up on such complaints by identifying whether sufficient and reasonable grounds existed for the use of the power. Any complaint where racial discrimination is alleged, suggested or apparent on a preliminary review conducted by an Inspector will be formally investigated with a view to identifying whether racial discrimination was a factor. All complaints (within the meaning of Section 12 of the Police Reform Act 2002) about the use of stop and search powers, whether made orally, in writing or by electronic means are centrally recorded. An improved scanning process has been introduced to ensure that all complaints which relate directly or indirectly to stop search are captured and categorised correctly. A full review of all complaints from 2009 and 2010 has been completed to verify previous statistics. In the reporting period of 1 October 2011 to 31 December 2011, no complaints have been recorded in relation to stop and search. 7. To address any case in which a person or vehicle has been stopped and searched where it is not entirely clear that the stop and search was in accordance with the S and S powers and the PACE Code A. The importance of the role of supervisors checking stop search forms is being highlighted in stop search training currently being delivered to frontline officers including supervisors. A supervisor must check stop search forms for completeness and sufficiency of grounds. If the supervisor is not satisfied with the stop search form or the grounds they are responsible for clarifying this with the officer concerned and making a record of any supervisory action taken. This process now takes place electronically and this has sped up the process and provides a more auditable trail for each stop search record. The details of every stop and search form are centrally inputted onto a database, the grounds are reproduced verbatim and a copy of every form can be viewed within the Force database. A revised management - 3 -

4 information and performance framework is being designed to provide detailed information and the ability to map stop search activity against crime and anti-social behaviour. There are associated costs and time restrictions on these developments. The Force is considering proposals from De Montfort University in Leicester to carry out some research on stop search activity. There are costs attached to the research proposed and a number of consultative meetings have taken place so that the research will deliver on key areas relating to race disproportionality and effectiveness. This includes meetings with the Stop Search Reference Group, University specialists and in-force intelligence and IT professionals, as well as representatives from the StopWatch Coalition. 8. To discuss with a representative group of stakeholders a published report of the outcome of the monitoring and analysis referred to at point 5 and to record their views on the impact of the use of S and S powers on the local community. 9. To discuss the outcome of the monitoring and analysis referred to at point 5 and the consultation referred to at point 8 within the ACPO command group in the force and with a nominated officer of the Commission. Detailed stop search data is shared with the Stop Search Reference Group at its monthly meetings. The Stop Search Reference Group consists of individuals directly or indirectly affected by stop search. Members include race equality specialists, a Police Authority member and members of the public. The group is independently chaired and Phil Pavey from the EHRC attended its meeting on 21 st February Ongoing monitoring and discussion of stop search data and related issues takes place on a monthly basis at the monthly Stop Search Gold Group and at Executive Group. 10. To undertake an equality impact assessment on the use of the S and S powers within one month of the publication of each alternate quarterly report. The first assessment was due for completion at the end of January This has been delayed due to unforeseen circumstances and will now be completed in April To forbid all officers from indicating either formally or informally any quantitative target for, or expectation as to, the number of uses of the S and S powers by any other officer or officers in any period of time; to include this in the force policy and to communicate the instruction force-wide. This has been communicated clearly by ACC Morgan in an intranet message published on 13 th January 2011 as previously submitted. The message has been viewed nearly 4000 times. The strapline It s the quality not quantity of stop searches that counts, contained in the message has been used in a number of other communications. This message is reinforced by stop search training and will be included in the revised stop search policy. Work to identify (and remove) any mechanisms that may indicate quantitative measurements of stop searches have been successful. An ongoing internal communications plan continues to reinforce quality over quantity. This includes repeated intranet messages and briefings to response officers and is reinforced on stop search training sessions

5 12. To undertake a training programme for relevant officers on the proper use of its S and S powers in accordance with PACE Code A and the impact on good race relations and equality of opportunity on the abuse of the power, in accordance with best practice and guidance from ACPO, the NPIA and the Home Office. The Chief Constable and the Commission will use reasonable endeavours to agree the content of the training which shall be determined by the Chief Constable in the absence of such agreement. Timescale: Training to be completed by the end of September 2011 The Force has undertaken an extensive consultation and learning needs analysis in formulating its stop search training. Officers attend a 2 day search course which includes the 2 hour stop search element. This includes a video introduction from the Chief Constable. A comprehensive audit trail of course development, feedback from the pilot course and subsequent feedback is available. To date 1575 members of staff have been trained and course feedback has been very positive. The training has been viewed by Phil Pavey from EHRC and by the Stop Search Reference Group, with similarly positive feedback. Training continues to be delivered to all frontline officers, Special Constables, supervisors, managers and intelligence professionals. It is anticipated that training delivery will be completed by the end of April Ongoing evaluation is taking place with very positive feedback from attendees. It is hoped that DMU will provide addition, objective evaluation of the effectiveness of stop search training. Actions not to be taken by Leicestershire Constabulary 13 Using previous proven criminal conduct alone as a factor in determining whether or not to use S and S powers 14 Requiring formally or informally any officer to conform to an expectation or individual target as to the overall number of uses of S and S powers These issues are specifically mentioned in the policy and explored within the training programme. To date no information has emerged to suggest these actions have been taken. 15 Permitting officers in any way to use S and S powers merely to seek to obtain intelligence. 16 Any use in any context by any officer of the number of occasions on which another officer has used S and S powers as an indicator of the performance of that officer for purposes such as recommendations for commendations, annual performance review or similar. 17 The fabrication of any ground for the use of S and S powers - 5 -

6 1 Reasons for stop search EHRC Quarterly Update Table 1-4 below shows that for the most recent quarter, stop/searches carried out by Leicestershire Constabulary are primarily for drugs (51.6%), followed by stolen property (27.2%). This is similar to the previous quarter. Drugs make up three quarters (74.4%) of all stop/searches carried out on Asian people, and over half (54.9%) of stop searches carried out on Black people. The drugs stop search rate for White people is 44.2%. Black race disproportionality is highest for offensive weapons at It is also high for drugs (5.6). Asian race disproportionality is 1.9 across all reasons with the highest race disproportionality ratio at 3.3 for drugs. /1,000 Pop Total Black Asian Drugs 41.3% 1, % % % % % 2, Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.8% % 1 0.1% 1 4.3% 1 3.3% 1 0.6% Firearms 0.6% % 2 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.5% Going Equipped to Steal 14.7% % % % 3 3.3% % Offensive Weapons 5.3% % % % 3 0.0% 0 6.0% % % 4 0.6% 4 0.0% 0 3.3% 1 1.5% Stolen Property 35.6% 1, % % % % % 1, Total 3, , Table 1-1 Reason for Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q1 /1,000 Pop Total Black Asian Drugs 41.5% % % % % % 1, Equipped for Criminal Damage 1.7% % 0 0.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% Firearms 0.9% % 4 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% Going Equipped to Steal 16.7% % % % % % Offensive Weapons 6.1% % % % 1 8.7% 4 7.3% % 8 0.6% 2 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% Stolen Property 32.7% % % % % % Total 2, , Table 1-2 Reason for Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q2 /1,000 Pop Total Black Asian Drugs 45.3% % % % % % 1, Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.3% 5 0.3% 1 1.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.4% Firearms 1.0% % 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 5.0% 1 0.7% Going Equipped to Steal 17.1% % % % % % Offensive Weapons 6.2% % % % % 3 7.1% % 9 1.2% 4 1.2% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% Stolen Property 29.5% % % % % % Total 1, , Table 1-3 Reason for Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q3 /1,000 Pop Total Black Asian Drugs 44.2% % % % % % 1, Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.8% % 0 0.6% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% Firearms 0.5% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% Going Equipped To Steal 17.0% % % % % % Offensive Weapons 3.9% % % % 0 6.9% 2 4.9% Stolen Property 32.0% % % % % % % % 0 2.2% % 0 0.0% 0 1.5% Total 1, , Table 1-4 Reason for Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q4 /1,000 Pop Total Black Asian Drugs 42.7% 3, % % 1, % % % 6, Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.9% % 2 0.5% % 1 0.8% 1 0.8% Firearms 0.7% % 6 0.1% 3 1.3% 1 0.8% 1 0.6% Going Equipped to Steal 16.1% 1, % % % % % 1, Offensive Weapons 5.4% % % % 6 7.2% 9 6.3% % % % % 4 6.4% 8 6.0% Stolen Property 27.2% 2, % % % % % 2, Total 8,516 1,303 2, , Table 1-5 Reason for Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-6 -

7 2 Reference to the specific locations The tables below demonstrate that the race disproportionality ratio varies greatly across LPUs. Table 2-4 shows that race disproportionality for Black people ranges from 0.0 (Rutland LPU) to 13.4 (Blaby LPU). For Asian people, the race disproportionality ranges from 0.3 (Melton LPU) to 38.8 (Oadby & Wigston LPU). Looking back over the full year data for 2011 it is clear that there is a spike in Black and Asian race disproportionality in Q3. White Black Asian Total Black Asian Beaumont Leys CB 71.7% % % % 2 0.8% Hinckley Road CH 80.3% % % % 4 1.3% Keyham Lane CK 44.9% % % % 5 2.5% City Centre CM 56.4% % % % 5 0.1% Spinney Hill Park CN 41.3% % % % 2 0.9% Welford Road CW 73.6% % % % 0 0.8% Harborough LA 87.4% % % % 0 0.0% Blaby LB 91.1% % 5 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 1.6% Charnwood LC 87.6% % 8 8.4% % 1 0.0% Hinckley LH 95.4% % 3 0.6% 1 0.6% 1 1.7% Melton LM 97.6% % 4 0.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% NW Leicestershire LN 94.8% % 6 1.7% 4 0.4% 1 0.4% Loughborough LO 87.3% % % % 2 0.0% Rutland LR 96.2% % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oadby & Wigston LW 68.6% % % % 0 0.0% City City 60.4% 1, % % % % 24 2, Counties Counties 90.0% 1, % % % 5 0.3% 6 1, Unknown UK Force FORCE 72.7% 3, % % % % 30 4, Table 2-1 Number of stop/searches by LPU & ethnicity with disproportionality ratios (actual numbers in brackets) - Q1 White Black Asian Total Black Asian Beaumont Leys CB 72.4% % % % 3 1.0% Hinckley Road CH 75.2% % % % 1 0.0% Keyham Lane CK 41.4% % % % 6 2.1% City Centre CM 54.2% % % % 2 0.4% Spinney Hill Park CN 29.8% % % % 2 0.5% Welford Road CW 69.4% % % % 3 1.3% Harborough LA 86.4% % 7 5.8% 6 0.0% 0 1.0% Blaby LB 82.8% % 4 9.7% % 1 3.7% Charnwood LC 80.3% % % % 0 1.4% Hinckley LH 92.0% % 1 0.7% 1 2.2% 3 4.4% Melton LM 97.1% % 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% NW Leicestershire LN 86.4% % 5 9.7% % 0 1.1% Loughborough LO 83.3% % % % 0 2.8% Rutland LR 78.3% % 3 4.3% 2 0.0% % Oadby & Wigston LW 80.6% % % 7 1.6% 1 1.6% City City 57.4% 1, % % % % 14 1, Counties Counties 86.2% 1, % % % 5 2.4% 32 1, Unknown UK Force FORCE 69.4% 2, % % % % 46 3, Table 2-2 Number of stop/searches by LPU & ethnicity with disproportionality ratios (actual numbers in brackets) - Q2 Total Black Asian Beaumont Leys CB 73.3% % % % 3 1.0% Hinckley Road CH 73.5% % % % 1 0.4% Keyham Lane CK 41.2% % % % 7 1.5% City Centre CM 61.5% % % % 3 1.1% Spinney Hill Park CN 32.0% % % % 4 0.9% Welford Road CW 55.3% % % % 1 0.8% Harborough LA 88.8% % 4 6.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% Blaby LB 86.8% % 6 5.5% 5 1.1% 1 0.0% Charnwood LC 82.9% % % % 0 0.0% Hinckley LH 91.7% % 2 5.2% 5 0.0% 0 1.0% Melton LM 93.0% % 1 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 0.0% NW Leicestershire LN 90.2% % 9 2.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.8% Loughborough LO 87.4% % % % 1 0.0% Rutland LR 97.0% % 0 3.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% Oadby & Wigston LW 77.3% % % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% City City 55.5% % % % % 18 1, Counties Counties 88.4% % % % 4 0.3% Unknown UK 100.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12 Force FORCE 65.3% 1, % % % % 20 2, Table 2-3 Number of stop/searches by LPU & ethnicity with disproportionality ratios (actual numbers in brackets) - Q3-7 -

8 Total Black Asian Beaumont Leys CB 73.8% % % % 0 1.8% Hinckley Road CH 75.4% % % % 0 2.7% Keyham Lane CK 42.5% % % % 3 0.9% City Centre CM 57.7% % % % 1 1.4% Spinney Hill Park CN 34.6% % % % 1 0.9% Welford Road CW 71.3% % % % 1 2.5% Harborough LA 79.8% % % % 1 0.0% Blaby LB 91.1% % 5 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% Charnwood LC 77.6% % % % 1 1.9% Hinckley LH 93.5% % 1 4.1% 5 0.0% 0 1.6% Melton LM 93.5% % 3 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.6% NW Leicestershire LN 97.2% % 1 1.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% Loughborough LO 83.4% % % % 1 0.7% Rutland LR 94.1% % 0 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% Oadby & Wigston LW 63.4% % % % 1 0.0% City City 57.7% % % % 6 1.6% 22 1, Counties Counties 85.9% % % % 4 0.8% Unknown UK 75.0% % % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8 Force FORCE 69.0% 1, % % % % 29 2, Table 2-4 Number of stop/searches by LPU & ethnicity with disproportionality ratios (actual numbers in brackets) - Q4 White Black Asian Total Black Asian Beaumont Leys CB 72.7% % % % 8 1.1% 14 1, Hinckley Road CH 76.5% % % % 6 1.0% 13 1, Keyham Lane CK 42.7% % % % % 24 1, City Centre CM 57.1% 1, % % % % 11 1, Spinney Hill Park CN 35.0% % % % 9 0.8% 9 1, Welford Road CW 68.5% % % % 5 1.1% Harborough LA 85.7% % % % 1 0.2% Blaby LB 87.9% % % % 2 1.5% Charnwood LC 82.8% % % % 2 0.8% Hinckley LH 93.4% % 7 2.3% % 4 2.3% Melton LM 96.2% % % 6 0.3% 2 0.6% NW Leicestershire LN 92.0% % % % 1 0.6% Loughborough LO 85.7% % % % 4 0.8% Rutland LR 90.6% % 5 2.7% 4 0.0% 0 3.4% Oadby & Wigston LW 70.2% % % % 2 0.4% City City 58.0% 4, % 1, % 1, % % 78 7, Counties Counties 87.9% 4, % % % % 47 4, Unknown UK 90.0% % 1 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20 Force FORCE 69.6% 8, % 1, % 2, % % , Table 2-5 Number of stop/searches by LPU & ethnicity with disproportionality ratios (actual numbers in brackets) - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-8 -

9 Table 3-4 shows that two-thirds of stop/searches (66.6%) are carried out during the night time hours, although the proportion varies across LPUs. The Counties BCU stop/search a slightly higher proportion of people at night than the City BCU. Day (06:00-17:59) Night (18:00-05:59) Total Day (06:00-17:59) Night (18:00-05:59) Total Beaumont Leys CB 36.8% % Beaumont Leys CB 30.2% % Hinckley Road CH 38.8% % Hinckley Road CH 36.1% % Keyham Lane CK 48.4% % Keyham Lane CK 43.5% % City Centre CM 46.7% % City Centre CM 46.7% % Spinney Hill Park CN 38.7% % Spinney Hill Park CN 41.7% % Welford Road CW 37.4% % Welford Road CW 39.4% % Harborough LA 14.2% % Harborough LA 24.3% % Blaby LB 23.4% % Blaby LB 18.7% % Charnwood LC 28.8% % Charnwood LC 15.4% % Hinckley LH 45.4% % Hinckley LH 34.3% % Melton LM 39.9% % Melton LM 36.9% % NW Leicestershire LN 45.0% % NW Leicestershire LN 35.8% % Loughborough LO 45.0% % Loughborough LO 46.8% % Rutland LR 15.1% % Rutland LR 30.4% % Oadby & Wigston LW 10.5% % Oadby & Wigston LW 24.2% % City City 42.1% 1, % 1,422 2,456 City City 40.3% % 1,114 1,867 Counties Counties 35.4% % 1,126 1,744 Counties Counties 31.3% % 909 1,324 Unknown UK Unknown UK Force FORCE 39.3% 1, % 2,548 4,200 Force FORCE 36.6% 1, % 2,023 3,191 Table 3-1 Time of Stop/Search by LPU - Q1 Table 3-2 Time of Stop/Search by LPU - Q2 Day (06:00-17:59) Night (18:00-05:59) Total Day (06:00-17:59) Night (18:00-05:59) Total Beaumont Leys CB 31.4% % Beaumont Leys CB 29.8% % Hinckley Road CH 34.5% % Hinckley Road CH 38.6% % Keyham Lane CK 37.1% % Keyham Lane CK 32.9% % City Centre CM 36.4% % City Centre CM 44.1% % Spinney Hill Park CN 37.9% % Spinney Hill Park CN 41.6% % Welford Road CW 30.9% % Welford Road CW 32.5% % Harborough LA 18.0% % Harborough LA 21.3% % Blaby LB 20.9% % Blaby LB 18.5% % Charnwood LC 28.8% % Charnwood LC 26.2% % Hinckley LH 33.3% % Hinckley LH 37.4% % Melton LM 19.3% % Melton LM 43.1% % NW Leicestershire LN 27.8% % NW Leicestershire LN 26.2% % Loughborough LO 46.3% % Loughborough LO 34.5% % Rutland LR 27.3% % Rutland LR 17.6% % Oadby & Wigston LW 22.7% % Oadby & Wigston LW 21.5% % City City 35.3% % 1,140 1,763 City City 36.5% % 890 1,402 Counties Counties 28.2% % Counties Counties 29.0% % Unknown UK 50.0% % 6 12 Unknown UK 0.0% % 8 8 Force FORCE 33.3% % 1,668 2,502 Force FORCE 33.4% % 1,560 2,343 Table 3-3 Time of Stop/Search by LPU - Q3 Table 3-4 Time of Stop/Search by LPU - Q4 Day (06:00-17:59) Night (18:00-05:59) Total Beaumont Leys CB 32.3% % 860 1,271 Hinckley Road CH 37.2% % 779 1,240 Keyham Lane CK 40.8% % 802 1,355 City Centre CM 44.0% % 1,066 1,904 Spinney Hill Park CN 39.7% % 669 1,109 Welford Road CW 36.0% % Harborough LA 19.1% % Blaby LB 20.3% % Charnwood LC 24.1% % Hinckley LH 38.5% % Melton LM 37.7% % NW Leicestershire LN 35.9% % Loughborough LO 44.0% % Rutland LR 22.8% % Oadby & Wigston LW 18.1% % City City 39.0% 2, % 4,566 7,488 Counties Counties 31.9% 1, % 3,219 4,728 Unknown Unknown 30.0% % Force FORCE 36.3% 4, % 7,799 12,236 Table 3-5 Time of Stop/Search by LPU - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-9 -

10 3 The gender & ethnicity of the officer using the power Data from table 4-4 shows that female officers carried out a higher proportion of stop/searches on Black & Asian people than male colleagues. This also leads to higher race disproportionality ratios. Male 73.2% 2, % % % % 20 3, Female 70.6% % % % 6 1.2% Unknown 70.1% % % % 2 1.1% Total 72.7% 3, % % % % 30 4, Table 4-1 Gender of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q1 Male 69.7% 1, % % % % 32 2, Female 67.4% % % % 3 2.2% Unknown 71.8% % % % 0 3.8% Total 69.4% 2, % % % % 46 3, Table 4-2 Gender of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q2 Male 66.7% 1, % % % % 16 2, Female 59.6% % % % 4 1.0% Unknown 46.9% % % % 0 0.0% Total 65.3% 1, % % % % 20 2, Table 4-3 Gender of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q3 Male 69.9% 1, % % % 8 1.2% 24 1, Female 62.7% % % % 2 0.9% Unknown 73.7% % % % 0 3.5% Total 69.0% 1, % % % % 29 2, Table 4-4 Gender of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q4 Male 70.3% 7, % 1, % 1, % % 92 9, Female 66.2% 1, % % % % 27 1, Unknown 68.5% % % % 2 2.4% Total 69.6% 8, % 1, % 2, % % , Table 4-5 Gender of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-10 -

11 Table 5-4 shows the race disproportionality ratio by ethnicity of officer carrying out the stop/search. It can be noted that other ethnicity officers have the highest race disproportionality ratio for Black people stopped searched, but this only relates to one stop search compared to two on White people. Asian officers stop/search nearly as many Asian people as White people, leading to a high race disproportionality ratio. They also have a high Black/White race disproportionality ratio. The relatively small numbers of stop searches carried out by Black and Asian officers makes it difficult to draw any firm conclusions from these statistics. White 74.0% 2, % % % % 27 3, Black 67.4% % % 4 0.0% 0 2.2% Asian 59.3% % % % 0 0.0% % % % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% Mixed 60.3% % % % 1 1.3% Not Stated 87.2% % % 5 0.0% 0 0.0% Unknown 67.1% % % % 2 0.7% Total 72.7% 3, % % % % 30 4, Table 5-1 Ethnicity of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q1 White 69.9% 1, % % % % 39 2, Black 88.6% % 2 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% Asian 58.7% % % % 0 1.4% % 4 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% Mixed 60.6% % % % 0 1.5% Not Stated 91.3% % 0 8.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% Unknown 69.6% % % % 0 2.4% Total 69.4% 2, % % % % 46 3, Table 5-2 Ethnicity of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q2 White 66.4% 1, % % % % 19 2, Black 69.6% % % 4 0.0% 0 0.0% Asian 54.2% % % % 0 0.6% % 0 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% Mixed 69.7% % % 6 6.1% 2 0.0% Not Stated 50.0% % % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% Unknown 54.9% % % % 0 0.0% Total 65.3% 1, % % % % 20 2, Table 5-3 Ethnicity of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q3 White 71.0% 1, % % % 9 1.2% 24 2, Black 71.4% % % 5 0.0% 0 3.6% Asian 44.2% % % % 0 1.4% % % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mixed 51.6% % % % 1 0.0% Not Stated 88.9% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Unknown 73.8% % % % 0 3.3% Total 69.0% 1, % % % % 29 2, Table 5-4 Ethnicity of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q4 White 70.8% 7, % 1, % 1, % % , Black 74.2% % % % 0 1.5% Asian 55.1% % % % 0 0.8% % % % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% Mixed 59.3% % % % 4 0.8% Not Stated 84.8% % % % 0 0.0% Unknown 67.4% % % % 2 1.5% Total 69.6% 8, % 1, % 2, % % , Table 5-5 Ethnicity of officer carrying out stop/search by ethnicity of person stopped - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-11 -

12 4 The gender & age of person stopped Data from table 6-4 shows that the highest level of race disproportionality for both Black and Asian ethnicities is on males (other than those stop/searches where the gender is unknown). Black females also experience a significant level of race disproportionality in stop search (3.3 in Q4). Table 6-5 shows significant levels of race disproportionality for Black men (5.0), Black women (2.9) and Asian men (1.8). Male 72.0% 2, % % % % 25 3, Female 83.5% % % % 2 0.7% Unknown 27.3% % % 3 0.0% % Total 72.7% 3, % % % % 30 4, Table 6-1 Gender of person stop/searched by Ethnicity - Q1 Male 68.9% 2, % % % % 37 2, Female 79.5% % % % 0 3.1% Unknown 50.0% % % 7 0.0% 0 8.3% Total 69.4% 2, % % % % 46 3, Table 6-2 Gender of person stop/searched by Ethnicity - Q2 Male 64.6% 1, % % % % 17 2, Female 85.2% % % 5 0.0% 0 0.0% Unknown 50.0% % % 8 0.0% 0 7.9% Total 65.3% 1, % % % % 20 2, Table 6-3 Gender of person stop/searched by Ethnicity - Q3 Male 68.2% 1, % % % 9 1.2% 27 2, Female 83.5% % % 7 0.8% 1 1.6% Unknown 66.7% % % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% Total 69.0% 1, % % % % 29 2, Table 6-4 Gender of person stop/searched by Ethnicity - Q4 Male 69.1% 6, % 1, % 1, % % 79 9, Female 82.5% % % % 2 1.4% Unknown 47.1% % % % % Total 69.6% 8, % 1, % 2, % % , Table 6-5 Gender of person stop/searched by Ethnicity - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-12 -

13 Table 7-4 shows that the highest race disproportionality is amongst Black people aged years old, who have a race disproportionality ratio of 4.7. Asian race disproportionality is highest in the year old age group, at years old 25.8% % % % % % 1, years old 41.7% 1, % % % % % 1, years old 19.3% % % % % % Years & Over 12.2% % % % % % Unknown 1.0% % 4 1.0% 7 0.0% 0 3.3% 1 1.0% Total 3, , Table 7-1 Age of person subject to stop/search by ethnicity - Q1 White Black Asian Total Black Asian years old 32.6% % % % % % years old 36.9% % % % % % 1, years old 18.3% % % % % % Years & Over 11.3% % % % 1 4.3% 2 9.7% Unknown 1.0% % 7 1.2% 7 0.0% 0 8.7% 4 1.3% Total 2, , Table 7-2 Age of person subject to stop/search by ethnicity - Q2 Total Black Asian years old 27.3% % % % % % years old 39.7% % % % % % 1, years old 20.3% % % % % % Years & Over 11.1% % % % 2 0.0% 0 9.4% Unknown 1.5% % % % % 2 2.0% Total 1, , Table 7-3 Age of person subject to stop/search by ethnicity - Q3 White Black Asian Total Black Asian years old 23.4% % % % % % years old 41.2% % % % % % 1, years old 21.1% % % % % % Years & Over 11.9% % % % % % Unknown 1.3% % 7 1.0% 5 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 1.4% Total 1, , Table 7-4 Age of person subject to stop/search by ethnicity - Q years old 27.5% 2, % % % % % 3, years old 40.0% 3, % % 1, % % % 5, years old 19.6% 1, % % % % % 2, Years & Over 11.7% % % % % % 1, Unknown 1.2% % % % 0 6.4% 8 1.4% Total 8,516 1,303 2, , Table 7-5 Age of person subject to stop/search by ethnicity - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-13 -

14 5 Arrests following a stop-search The tables below show the numbers of arrests and corresponding arrest rates for stop/search by ethnicity. It can be seen from table 8-4 that currently the force arrests people from 9.2% of all stop/searches. Arrest rates for White and Black people stop searched are similar (10% and 9.8% respectively) but the rate for Asian people is significantly lower (5.7%). The full 2011 data shows stop search arrest rates of 9.6, 11.7 and 7.2% respectively. Number of Arrests Arrest Rate White Black Asian Total Total Drugs 27.7% % % % 1 0.0% % 9.7% 5.6% 11.1% 6.1% Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% Firearms 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% Going Equipped to Steal 16.8% % 1 5.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% % 2.6% 7.7% 0.0% 8.9% Offensive Weapons 12.9% % % 6 0.0% 0 0.0% % 16.3% 16.7% 0.0% 18.7% 2.3% 6 0.0% 0 3.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 50.0% % Stolen Property 39.8% % % % % % 11.5% 17.0% 28.6% 10.2% Total % 10.0% 8.3% 13.0% 8.5% Table 8-1 Arrests From Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q1 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate White Black Asian Total Total Drugs 19.1% % % % % % 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.7% Equipped for Criminal Damage 1.2% 3 0.0% 0 3.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % % % Firearms 0.4% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 25.0% 0.0% - 8.0% Going Equipped to Steal 14.8% % 2 3.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 6.3% 4.0% 0.0% 9.1% Offensive Weapons 9.8% % 7 8.8% 5 0.0% % % 11.9% 14.3% 0.0% 16.2% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% Stolen Property 47.7% % % % % % 13.3% 13.9% 0.0% 16.3% Total % 10.8% 7.0% 0.0% 10.0% Table 8-2 Arrests From Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q2 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate White Black Asian Total Total Drugs 18.8% % % % % % 13.3% 4.7% 16.7% 7.1% Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 80.0% % Firearms 1.2% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % % 16.7% Going Equipped to Steal 10.2% % 7 3.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 15.6% 5.3% 0.0% 9.5% Offensive Weapons 7.0% % % 8 0.0% % % 19.4% 22.9% 0.0% 19.2% 0.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 5.3% Stolen Property 26.6% % % 5 0.0% % % 24.2% 9.8% 0.0% 14.7% Total % 16.2% 7.2% 8.7% 10.3% Table 8-3 Arrests From Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q3 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate White Black Asian Total Total Drugs 17.2% % % % % % 8.7% 4.9% 16.7% 6.1% Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % - 0.0% % Firearms 1.6% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % % Going Equipped To Steal 9.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 7.1% Offensive Weapons 5.5% % 6 5.3% 3 0.0% % % 27.3% 11.1% % Stolen Property 28.9% % % % % % 8.3% 12.0% 25.0% 13.6% 0.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % - 0.0% - 2.8% Total % 9.8% 5.6% 20.0% 9.2% Table 8-4 Arrests From Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q4 Arrest Rate Total Total Drugs 25.9% % % % % % 10.5% 5.1% 10.3% 6.2% Equipped for Criminal Damage 0.7% 6 0.0% 0 3.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 54.5% 0.0% 12.8% Firearms 1.0% 8 0.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 12.2% Going Equipped to Steal 15.9% % % 7 0.0% 0 0.0% % 7.7% 4.5% 0.0% 8.7% Offensive Weapons 11.0% % % % % % 16.9% 16.5% 0.0% 18.4% 9.9% % 5 5.0% % 1 9.1% % 7.1% 13.1% 25.0% 13.2% Stolen Property 35.7% % % % % % 15.8% 13.8% 13.3% 13.0% Total , % 11.7% 7.2% 9.0% 9.4% Table 8-5 Arrests From Stop-Search by Ethnicity - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-14 -

15 Table 9-4 shows that the arrest rate from stop/search varies across the force area from 2.1% on the Harborough LPU, to 18.3% on the City Centre LPU. Arrest Rate Total Total Beaumont Leys 79.2% % 4 4.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 7.4% 2.1% 0.0% 6.3% Hinckley Road 87.2% % 3 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% % 9.1% 8.1% 0.0% 11.8% Keyham Lane 57.1% % % % 0 0.0% % 11.3% 9.8% 0.0% 12.2% City Centre 66.3% % % % 1 1.1% % 10.3% 8.9% 20.0% 12.9% Spinney Hill Park 55.9% % % % 0 0.0% % 5.7% 8.5% 0.0% 10.0% Welford Road 70.0% % % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% % 10.0% 9.1% - 8.1% Harborough 80.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% - 3.9% Blaby 100.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 3.2% Charnwood 87.5% 7 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 3.5% Hinckley 50.0% % % % 1 0.0% % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5.7% Melton 100.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 2.4% NW Leicestershire 71.4% % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% Loughborough 84.4% % % 6 2.2% 1 0.0% % 0.0% 15.0% 50.0% 9.9% Rutland 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% % Oadby & Wigston 66.7% % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 20.0% 0.0% - 8.6% City 68.4% % % % 1 0.4% % 9.2% 8.4% 5.6% 10.7% Counties 80.0% % 9 8.4% 8 2.1% 2 0.0% % 15.0% 7.8% 40.0% 5.4% Unknown Force 71.5% % % % 3 0.3% % 10.0% 8.3% 13.0% 8.5% Table 9-1 Arrests from Stop/Search by LPU - Q1 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate White Black Asian Total Total Beaumont Leys 81.8% % % 5 0.0% 0 0.0% % 2.9% 10.9% 0.0% 10.5% Hinckley Road 77.8% % % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% % 7.5% 7.5% 0.0% 8.3% Keyham Lane 55.2% % % 7 0.0% 0 6.9% % 10.5% 5.8% 0.0% 9.9% City Centre 72.5% % % 8 0.0% 0 0.0% % 9.0% 6.3% 0.0% 12.4% Spinney Hill Park 30.0% % % % 0 0.0% % 18.2% 12.3% 0.0% 13.8% Welford Road 64.3% % 4 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 21.1% 4.0% 0.0% 8.8% Harborough 100.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 7.8% Blaby 100.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% Charnwood 87.5% % % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 7.1% - 7.7% Hinckley 100.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% Melton 84.6% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% % 25.0% % NW Leicestershire 95.8% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 20.0% 0.0% % Loughborough 87.5% % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.1% % 42.9% 0.0% % Rutland 60.0% % % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 33.3% 50.0% % Oadby & Wigston 100.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% City 65.3% % % % 0 1.0% % 10.4% 7.9% 0.0% 10.8% Counties 90.6% % 6 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 1.7% % 13.6% 2.9% 0.0% 8.8% Unknown Force 74.6% % % % 0 1.3% % 10.8% 7.0% 0.0% 10.0% Table 9-2 Arrests from Stop/Search by LPU - Q2 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate Total Total Beaumont Leys 86.2% % 1 6.9% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% % 3.6% 4.4% 0.0% 9.8% Hinckley Road 75.9% % % 3 0.0% 0 0.0% % 10.5% 11.5% 0.0% 11.6% Keyham Lane 45.2% % % % 0 0.0% % 11.3% 8.3% 0.0% 9.2% City Centre 69.8% % % 4 3.2% 2 0.0% % 18.6% 4.4% 66.7% 14.4% Spinney Hill Park 22.2% % % 8 0.0% 0 5.6% % 22.2% 6.2% 0.0% 11.3% Welford Road 58.8% % % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 18.5% 7.7% 0.0% 13.8% Harborough % 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% Blaby 100.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% Charnwood 66.7% % 3 8.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 50.0% 7.7% % Hinckley 85.7% 6 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 20.0% - 7.3% Melton 100.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% NW Leicestershire 66.7% % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 22.2% 0.0% - 4.5% Loughborough 85.7% % 1 9.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 100.0% 20.0% 0.0% 22.1% Rutland 0.0% 0 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % % - 3.0% Oadby & Wigston 0.0% 0 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 33.3% - 4.5% City 60.0% % % % 2 1.5% % 15.8% 6.7% 10.5% 11.6% Counties 76.9% % % 6 0.0% 0 0.0% % 19.4% 12.8% 0.0% 7.2% Unknown 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % % Force 63.6% % % % 2 1.2% % 16.2% 7.2% 8.7% 10.3% Table 9-3 Arrests from Stop/Search by LPU - Q3-15 -

16 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate Total Total Beaumont Leys 95.5% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 3.2% 0.0% - 7.8% Hinckley Road 84.6% % 0 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 7.7% % 0.0% 3.6% - 4.9% Keyham Lane 71.4% % % 4 4.8% 1 0.0% % 2.0% 3.0% 33.3% 6.5% City Centre 61.0% % % 5 2.4% 1 2.4% % 18.4% 12.5% 100.0% 18.6% Spinney Hill Park 32.3% % % % 0 0.0% % 28.1% 10.3% 0.0% 13.4% Welford Road 100.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% Harborough 100.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% Blaby 92.9% % 0 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 16.7% % Charnwood 66.7% 2 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 2.8% Hinckley 100.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 4.9% Melton 94.1% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 33.3% 0.0% % NW Leicestershire 100.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% % Loughborough 85.0% % 1 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% % 33.3% 5.3% 0.0% 13.8% Rutland 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % - 0.0% - 5.9% Oadby & Wigston 50.0% 1 0.0% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 2.2% City 65.7% % % % 2 1.5% % 10.2% 6.0% 33.3% 9.6% Counties 91.4% % 2 4.9% 4 0.0% 0 1.2% % 7.7% 4.2% 0.0% 8.7% Unknown % 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% Force 75.3% % % % 2 1.4% % 9.8% 5.6% 20.0% 9.2% Table 9-4 Arrests from Stop/Search by LPU - Q4 Number of Arrests Arrest Rate Total Total Beaumont Leys 85.2% % 7 7.4% 8 0.0% 0 0.9% % 4.7% 4.5% 0.0% 8.5% Hinckley Road 81.9% % % % 0 0.9% % 7.1% 7.6% 0.0% 9.4% Keyham Lane 56.2% % % % 1 1.5% % 8.8% 6.9% 4.8% 9.6% City Centre 67.9% % % % 4 0.8% % 12.5% 7.5% 36.4% 13.8% Spinney Hill Park 35.1% % % % 0 1.5% % 18.1% 9.1% 0.0% 11.8% Welford Road 68.4% % % 6 0.0% 0 0.0% % 14.6% 6.1% 0.0% 9.4% Harborough 93.3% % 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% Blaby 96.2% % 0 3.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 5.5% Charnwood 79.5% % % 5 0.0% 0 0.0% % 10.3% 6.6% 0.0% 6.0% Hinckley 81.8% % 3 6.1% 2 3.0% 1 0.0% % 42.9% 16.7% 25.0% 6.2% Melton 92.1% % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% % 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% NW Leicestershire 90.6% % 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 23.8% 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% Loughborough 85.6% % 5 7.6% 9 0.8% 1 1.7% % 18.5% 9.3% 25.0% 12.4% Rutland 62.5% % % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 20.0% 50.0% - 5.4% Oadby & Wigston 66.7% % % 2 0.0% 0 0.0% % 13.0% 3.4% 0.0% 5.3% City 65.0% % % % 5 1.0% % 11.4% 7.4% 8.3% 10.7% Counties 85.8% % % % 2 0.9% % 14.3% 6.1% 11.1% 7.3% Unknown 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% - 5.0% Force 71.3% % % % 7 1.0% 11 1, % 11.7% 7.2% 9.0% 9.4% Table 9-5 Arrests from Stop/Search by LPU - Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4-16 -