Hybrid Performance and Positioning Information. northland, south auckland, bay of plenty, gisborne & northern hawke s bay

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Hybrid Performance and Positioning Information. northland, south auckland, bay of plenty, gisborne & northern hawke s bay"

Transcription

1 Hybrid Performance and Positioning Information northland, south auckland, bay of plenty, gisborne & northern hawke s bay 2014

2 Hybrid Options for your Region REGION 1 Northland / South Auckland Coastal BOP / Gisborne Northern Hawke s Bay Hybrids Estimated days from planting to harvest 39V43 * - * P7524 * - * P V H P Y P P P M A P D P P P G M P G Maturity US VS S M F VL MATURITY KEY US = Ultra short VS = Very short S = Short M = Mid F = Full VL = Very long ELITE HYBRID PROVEN HYBRID * = Northern Hawke s Bay only. Consult with your Area Manager. NOTES Hybrid maturity is based on heat unit accumulation through the season. Hybrids will therefore be quicker to harvest in warmer regions or warmer. For example, a hybrid planted in coastal Bay of Plenty will be ready for harvesting much earlier than the same hybrid planted on the same day in Central Taranaki due to the faster accumulation of heat units in the Bay of Plenty environment. This has important implications for hybrid selection. The table above is a guide as to the estimated days from planting to harvest for hybrids in the regions for which they are recommended for silage. This information is generated from silage hybrid trials carried out in these regions over several.

3 Pioneer Brand Maize For Silage Hybrid Trait Characteristics Yield Plant traits Silage quality traits Hybrid disease ratings Recommended established plant populations (000s/ha) Hybrid Silage CRM 1 Grain yield for maturity 2 for maturity 2 Adaptability to high population 3 Adaption to low population 4 (ear flex) 39V P G T F P V H P P Y P P P M A P D P P P G M P G Drought tolerance Stalk strength Root strength Early growth 5 Plant height 6 Staygreen 7 Whole plant digestibility 8 Fibre digestibility 9 Silage crude protein 10 Silage readily available energy Northern Leaf Blight 12 Common Rust Eyespot Challenging yield environments Medium yield environments High yield environments Hybrid NR V P G T45 NR F P V H P P Y P P P M A P0791 NR D P P P G M P1636 NR G66 Elite Hybrids Proven Hybrids The Elite Hybrid range includes the latest, industry leading hybrids most recently commercialised from the New Zealand Research Programme. The Elite Hybrid range offers farmers top yields of high quality silage. Incorporating Pioneer s latest germplasm, these products are dominating New Zealand trials. The Proven Hybrid range includes hybrids that have been trusted and delivered peace-of-mind to farmers over a number of. Proven Hybrids offer solid performance at a competitive price. They may not yield more than Pioneer Elite Hybrids, but they won t let you down. RATINGS: 9 = Outstanding 1 = Poor - = Insufficient data available = New hybrid NR = Not recommended = Elite Hybrid = Proven Hybrid

4 Trait characteristics notes: 1 Silage comparative relative maturity (CRM): Pioneer silage CRM ratings provide a comparison between Pioneer hybrids indicating the relative rates at which hybrids reach harvestable whole plant drymatter. They do not represent actual calendar days from planting to harvest. 2 Yield for maturity: Hybrid should only be made within a range of + or 4 CRM. Analysis of differences in harvest drymatter percentages between hybrids measured in our New Zealand forage research programme show products compared within + or 4 CRM will reach ideal silage harvest maturity (defined as 32% - 38% DM) within about seven days of each other. 3 Adaptability to high population: A measure of the mix of genetic factors that permit a maize plant to withstand the stresses of high population and still give good standability and high yields. 4 Adaptability to low population: An indicator of a hybrid s ability to compensate (flex) cob size for stand loss from insect damage or poor emergence. 5 Early growth: Ratings are taken when two leaf collars are visible. 6 Plant height: 9 = Tall. 1 = Short. 7 Staygreen: A measure of late season plant health. A lower score also means that the plant stover loses colour and dries down more rapidly at maturity. 8 Whole plant digestibility: Based on estimated 24 hour in vitro, whole plant digestibility percentage (DM basis) as predicted by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS). 9 Fibre digestibility: Based on 24 hour enzymatic estimate of the proportion of degradable neutral detergent fibre (NDF) as a percentage of the total NDF in whole plant sample, predicted by NIRS. 10 Silage crude protein: Based on the amount of crude protein in the whole plant, predicted by NIRS. 11 Readily available energy (RAE): Based on total starch, sugar and oil content of hybrids harvested at silage maturity. Use this score as a relative comparison of the whole plant concentration of more readily available energy (primarily grain) among individual hybrids. 12 Northern Leaf Blight (NLB) and Eyespot: Caution: In conditions where NLB and Eyespot risks are high, growers should only consider planting hybrids with at least moderate resistance ratings of 5 or higher for these diseases. 13 Hybrid disease resistance ratings: 8 to 9 = Highly resistant. 6 to 7 = Resistant. 4 to 5 = Moderately resistant. 1 to 3 = Susceptible. - = Insufficient data. Common Rust ratings are mostly based on United States and European data as the New Zealand database is usually too small to give a statistically valid rating. Eyespot and NLB ratings are based on overseas data together with New Zealand observations. Scores are based on visual assessment only and not on yield reduction data. 14 Cool environments: In cool environments, including high altitude sites greater than approximately 150 m / 500 ft above sea level, select your yield environment using the descriptions in note 17, then increase established plant populations to the next level i.e.for P0791 in a medium yield environment at high altitude, plant to achieve 108,000 established plants per hectare. 15 Established plant populations: These assume good seed establishment conditions. If you are planting very early or into a less than ideal seedbed or where insect pressure may be high (e.g. a shorter than optimum fallow period), plant populations may need to be increased to compensate for reduced establishment due to field losses. 16 Plant populations: The tabulated established populations are s only. Work with your local Pioneer Representative or Merchant Seed Representative to determine the appropriate plant populations for your specific growing environment. 17 Growing environment definitions: May include some or all of the following characteristics: Challenging yield environments (CYE) Typically light, sandy or shallow soils of low fertility, low moisture retention, and predictably low summer rainfall (drought-prone environments). High cob or leaf disease pressure. Medium yield environments (MYE) Average fertility soils with predictably adequate summer rainfall and good moisture retention. Continuously cropped soils. Medium to low cob or leaf disease pressure. Recommended for new maize growers. High yield environments (HYE) Typically deeper, highly fertile and well structured soils with good moisture retention. Predictably good summer rainfall, shelter from high wind run. Good soils straight out of long term pasture. Low or no cob or leaf disease pressure

5 contents New hybrids introduced for spring IMPACT TM and PATs effectively test and deliver new commercial hybrids 4 Trial results, side-by-side and statistical significance 7 Selecting the best hybrid trial numbers are important 9 Regression analysis 11 Milk profit calculations 12 Phillips, John 38 Pow, Tom 38 Robinson, David & Tina 38 bay of plenty, gisborne & hawke s bay Paired Silage Comparisons Comparison index Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay 40 northland & south auckland Paired Silage Comparisons Comparison index Northland & South Auckland 14 Individual Farmer trial results Northland & South Auckland Ashy Family Trust 36 Cashin, Simon 36 Flintoff, Carl 36 Flood, Daniel & Carolyn 36 Fox, Graham 36 Harvey, Paul 36 Hukerenui School (Bastienne Kruger) 37 Kaycee Farms Ltd (K & C Tucker) 37 King, Logan 37 Konings, Michael 37 Landcorp Farming Ltd (Sweetwater) 37 Leeuwenburg, Ian & Gill 37 Okaihau Pastoral Ltd (Foster J & J) 38 Individual Farmer trial results Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Barr, Alan 78 Grant Farms Ltd 78 Hawkes Bay Dairies (J D Hopkins) 78 Jordaan, Japie 78 Mathis, Gerald & Kylee 78 Mathis, Steve 79 Rawai Agriculture Ltd (R Dakins) 79 Riverlock Farms Ltd (Jim Brown) 79 Van den Broek, Chris 79 Van den Broek, Wayne 79 Wardlaw, Allen 79 Webb, Bill 80 Whakatohea Māori Trustees 80 Zink, Eric 81 Thankyou to the 2013/2014 Trial Co-operators 83

6 NEW HYBRIDS INTRODUCED FOR SPRING 2015 For more than 80 years Pioneer breeders have improved the agronomy, disease resistance and yield of commercially available maize hybrids. The annual rate of silage yield gain in New Zealand is estimated to have been over 300 kilograms of drymatter per hectare per year over the last 50 years (from Pioneer research and published crop yield data). As a result, a newly introduced Pioneer hybrid will have a considerable yield advantage over older hybrids. To maximise their returns, silage growers should look to introduce new hybrids that are best suited to their farm system on a regular basis. Desired harvest timing, soil type, cultivation methods, agronomic traits such as early growth, drought tolerance, stalk and root strength, disease resistances and silage quality traits are all important considerations in the hybrid selection process. The most reliable way to select superior hybrids is to consider yield and quality performance information, gathered over several and over a wide range of locations within a growing region. Individual on-farm trial results should not be used to select a hybrid because they are not a reliable predictor of hybrid performance in future. A useful rule of thumb is that at least 20 locations of data are required to provide adequate comparative yield performance information. This data should then be statistically analysed to establish the quality of the data and if there are any real differences between hybrids being compared. This publication provides a summary of the investment made to evaluate the silage yield performance of products and other brands of silage hybrids in defined growing regions in New Zealand. For spring 2015 a number of new silage hybrids will be introduced for the first time: P7524: Intermediate in maturity between 39V43 and 39G12. An exciting new option for growers in cooler high latitude or high altitude growing environments. P8805: Intermediate in maturity between 39T45 and 38V12. A top yielding hybrid for silage and grain that has excellent all round agronomics and a balanced disease profile. P9721: Similar to 37Y12 but delivers higher silage yield. A great all-round balanced package of agronomic traits with wide adaptability. P9911: A key maturity option in the Optimum AQUAmax range delivering great drought tolerance. An impressive all-round hybrid with top agronomics and a sound disease package. Combines the best of bulk and energy for maximum milk productivity. P1636: Combines impressive agronomics, drought tolerance and provides a wide harvest window. Similar in type and maturity to 33M54 and is particularly adapted to Northland and Bay of Plenty. All have been extensively tested and offer performance advantages over more established hybrids. We recommend this publication be used in conjunction with the Maize for Silage 2014/2015 catalogue and the expertise provided by Pioneer as well as your local Merchant Representatives. MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 3

7 Growing Season No two are quite the same. The season was however, similar to in much of Northland and Waikato with good early growing conditions but became hot and dry over the January to March period. Once again in these regions the harvest was significantly earlier and quicker than average. In the Bay of Plenty, Gisborne, Hawke s Bay, Lower North Island and Taranaki, growing conditions were generally good although tended to be dry towards harvest. In the South Island the silage crops grew well but could have benefited from more heat during the heart of the growing season. The trial yield results reported in this publication range from poor to exceptional. The exceptional crops often trace back to optimum planting dates into paddocks of good water holding capacity and with the application of the best agronomic practices, overlaid with sufficient rain and heat to grow the crop. IMPACT and PAT s effectively test and deliver new commercial hybrids products ongoing commitment to sourcing and effective testing of hybrids in New Zealand provides growers with the opportunity to maximise maize silage yield and quality. The IMPACT trials (Intensively Managed Product Advancement, Characterisation and Training trials) together with the PAT (Product Advancement Trials) testing programme marks a unique team effort between research, sales, growers and contractors. IMPACT, or replicated small plot trials, provide local testing of up to 100 hybrids. The best experimental hybrids are advanced to strip or PAT trials for further and more extensive testing the next season. The silage PAT s only evaluate 6 to 8 hybrids at a time but are over a wider geographic spread in growing regions where the new hybrid is expected to have a performance advantage over existing commercial hybrids. The IMPACT programme is an advanced method for evaluating maize hybrids in replicated research plots. These trials are planted using specialised pneumatic 4-row research plot planters with GPS guidance for increased accuracy and precision in a range of environments with different soil types, weather and disease pressures. As the name implies, they benefit from intensive management, close observation and evaluation throughout the growing season. At the end of the growing season specialist forage harvesters measure hybrid yield as the plots are being harvested. The geographical spread of IMPACT trials is enabled by the availability of equipment transporters facilitating these trials at locations from Northland, through the Waikato, to the Lower North Island last season. Together, these trials funnel more local information into the product commercialisation decision making process. It allows products to bring proven, industryleading maize genetics to the New Zealand market and to understand which products offer the best performance in each growing region. As a result, specific customer needs can be more readily targeted and in doing so, the grower will experience the benefit of our Right Product, Right Paddock strategy. The aim of the trial programme is to identify the best maize hybrids for New Zealand growing conditions. We achieve this through the combination of comprehensive field observation, as well as rigorous data evaluation and statistical analysis of the results generated, as shown in the flow chart below. MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 4

8 Pioneer Hi-Bred International Global Breeding Programme Thousands of new hybrids evaluated each year. New Zealand Maize Silage Hybrid Evaluation Programme IMPACT trials test up to 100 experimental and commercial hybrids. The best new hybrids are advanced for PAT testing in the next season. PAT trials evaluate the best new hybrids grown side-by-side with existing commercial hybrids in on-farm trials. Side-by-side trial data collected from at least 20 locations, over several, within a growing region is pooled to create an average yield result for the two hybrids. A t-test analysis is used to calculate the statistical significance of the measured pooled side-by-side yield result. Statistical significance is indicated by significance stars. New Zealand Maize Silage Grower 25 tried and tested high yielding maize silage hybrids available to local growers in spring MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 5

9 growing regions Growing regions used for data summary and hybrid performance reporting: 1. Northland & South Auckland 2. Waikato 3. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Northern Hawke s Bay 4. Lower North Island & Taranaki 5. South Island MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 6

10 TRIAL RESULTS, SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISONS AND STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE Trial results In order to ensure accuracy in field-weighing and silage drymatter determination, the Pioneer Field Technicians follow ISO 9001:2008 approved best practice procedures. All farmer trial co-operators receive a copy of their individual results. This information represents the outcome of comparing hybrids included in that one environment, in that particular season and under the management practice employed by the grower. The results of IMPACT trials have not been published, as most hybrids are only experimental they will not be tested again and as a result are not of direct interest to the maize growing community. When using trial results, it is essential that the overall performance of a hybrid over several and sites in your growing region is considered, as this is more likely to be a robust and stable indicator of future performance in your paddock. Side-by-side and statistical significance In a side-by-side comparison, Hybrid A and Hybrid B are planted side-by-side in the same paddock according to strict scientific protocols. At harvest, crop yield, drymatter and nutritional characteristics are measured. This allows the performance of the two hybrids to be compared under the same growing conditions. Side-by-side trial data collected from a number of locations over several within defined growing regions is pooled to create an average side-by-side yield result for the two hybrids. A statistical analysis (called a t-test) is used to calculate the statistical significance of the measured, pooled, side-by-side yield result. This may sound complicated but statistical significance, indicated by significance stars ( ), simply shows how likely the measured average of the side-by-side yield difference is, due to an actual genetic yield difference between the two hybrids, rather than just chance. In other words we are essentially asking: Based on the data, are these two products the same or different for yield? MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 7

11 Interpretation of the t-test stars ( ) for hybrid side-by-side yield The table below presents a summary of the possible t-test outcomes. INTERPRETATION OF PAIRED COMPARISONS Where stars are shown below each comparison, this indicates the level of confidence that a real yield difference actually exists between the two hybrids based on the yield data. Yield superiority can only be concluded where one to three stars are present. P CONFIDENCE SCIENTIFIC LEVEL OF YIELD INTERPRETATION VALUE LEVEL DESIGNATION SIGNIFICANCE ADVANTAGE Very highly <0.001 >99.9% YES Product superiority for yield can be claimed. Can significant confidently plant a product providing no key agronomic <0.01 >99.0% Highly significant YES traits are limiting, and/or if a key trait advantage exists. <0.05 >95.0% Significant YES Check the trait ratings for any considerations. <0.10 >90.0% CA Commercially Acceptable >0.10 <90.0% Not significant NO YES Not a significant result, but may be regarded as commercially acceptable from which to base a decision. Product superiority for yield cannot be claimed. Ignore the yield comparison and refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the products. The more stars ( ) present for the comparison, the more confident we can be that the measured average side-by-side yield difference is due to an actual genetic yield difference between the two hybrids rather than just chance. Where a result is commercially acceptable (CA), the result is not designated as statistically significant, but it may be regarded as commercially acceptable. Where a result is not significant, we cannot conclude there is a yield difference between the hybrids. This may have two principle implications; 1. Where the yields are very similar, and the comparison has been made over more than 20 locations, no significance may indicate there is little measurable difference between the two hybrids (i.e. they yield about the same) or; 2. Where there appears to be a yield difference, no significance will generally indicate there are too few trial locations involved, or there have been inconsistent or fluctuating results. It is therefore not possible to confidently indicate whether the difference is real. In this instance, growers should use the important hybrid trait ratings to select which hybrid to plant. On the other hand, yields may appear to be very similar but still achieve significance this happens in cases where yield variations are small and the number of trial locations is large. A t-test analysis of statistical significance is now carried out on all Pioneer side-byside and we take great care to base our product yield statements on the outcome. MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 8

12 SELECTING THE BEST HYBRID SELECTING THE BEST HYBRID TRIAL NUMBERS ARE IMPORTANT TRIAL NUMBERS ARE IMPORTANT Another way of interpreting side-by-side is to assess the probability of selecting the right hybrid based on the data. The two key factors which improve the probability of selecting the right hybrid from the comparison Another way of interpreting side-by-side is to assess the probability of are the number of locations involved and the size of the measured yield selecting the right hybrid based on the data. The two key factors which improve the difference. probability of selecting the right hybrid from the comparison are the number of locations involved and below the sizepresents of the measured yield difference. The table the probability of selecting the right hybrid from a series side-by-side on these two hybrid factors. The tableofbelow presents the probabilitybased of selecting the right from a series of side- by-side based on these two factors. Probability of correctly selecting the better hybrid in a silage hybrid side-by-side comparison given a specified of trials and the Probability of correctly selecting the better hybrid innumber a silage hybrid side-by-side measured given yield adifference. comparison specified number of trials and the measured yield difference. Number Trials of Measured Yield Difference (kilograms of drymatter per hectare) % 63.1% 69.1% 74.8% % 85.4% 94.3% 98.2% % 95.2% 99.4% >99.9% % 99.1% >99.9% >99.9% Standard deviation of the yield is difference to be 1,500 kgdm/ha. Standard deviation of the yield difference assumed to is beassumed 1,500 kgdm/ha. Simply stated the reason we ve strongly emphasised the importance of using multi-location data for the comparison of interest is that it is the best and most practical way of increasing your chance of selecting the highest performing Simply stated the reason we ve strongly emphasised the importance of using multihybrid. location data for the comparison of interest is that it is the best and most practical way of increasing yourwhere chance of selecting highest performing hybrid. For example a hybrid has atheyield advantage of 500 kg of drymatter per hectare 10where trialsaofhybrid yieldhas data gives a probability of choosing the For example a yield advantage of 500ofkg63.1% of drymatter per hectare higher yielding hybrid. This rises to 95.2% with 25 trial. 10 trials of yield data gives a probability of 63.1% of choosing the higher yielding hybrid. This rises to 95.2% with 25 trial. This is the tool that Pioneer brand products uses to help growers make the best hybrid choices. We use paired, over as many paddocks as This is the tool that Pioneer brand products uses to help growers make the best hybrid possible, within the growing regionover andas area of paddocks adaptation the twowithin hybrids. choices. We use paired, many asof possible, the This generates data which gives growers the highest probability of selecting growing region and area of adaptation of the two hybrids. This generates data which the winning hybrid. gives growers the highest probability of selecting the winning hybrid. The tablealso also shows it fewer takes locations fewer locations to confidently identify The table shows that that it takes to confidently identify superior superior hybrids with large yield advantages, than when searching for hybrids with large yield advantages, than when searching for small differences.small differences. The table on the next page shows the format in which the analysis is presented in The table on the next page shows the format in which the analysis is this publication. presented in this publication. MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 9

13 P8805 compared with 38H20 for silage. Lower North Island & Taranaki P8805 (%) 38H20 (%) advantage to P8805 P8805 to P8805 ($/ha) 3 27 trials 40.1 % 36.3 % kgdm/ha + $902 /ha P8805 outyields 38H20 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product The table indicates; The hybrids being compared (P8805 and 38H20) The number of of data included (3) The total number of made between the two hybrids (27) Average harvest dry matter for each hybrid (40.1% and 36.3%) The yield advantage in kgdm/ha (1031) The milk profit advantage per hectare ($902) The level of statistical significance as explained on page 8. Comparisons are calculated based on trials where the hybrids were planted in the same trial. The milk profit advantage reported relates to the potential value of milksolids produced from the reported drymatter yield advantage. Please refer to page 12 for the assumptions used in this calculation. MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 10

14 regression analysis A regression analysis is used to describe the relationship between two sets of data. In the case of this publication it describes the relationship between the yields of two hybrids related to the average yield of all hybrids in a series of trials where the two hybrids have been grown together. The regression graph below is made up by a number of important components; The coefficient of determination (R 2 ). This represents the proportion of the data that is explained by the lines of best fit. The higher the R 2 the more confidence we may have in the lines of best fit. If the R 2 was 1.00 the yield line would perfectly describe the hybrid yield response and every data point would fall on this line. The graph is plotted against the x and y axis where; X axis = trial average yield (in kilograms of drymatter per hectare) which is the average yield for all hybrids in the same trial. Y axis = yield (in kilograms of drymatter per hectare) which is the individual hybrid yield. Along each axis the yield levels are indicated. The yield of each hybrid is plotted against the trial average yield as a measure of environmental potential. Each triangle or square symbol indicates an individual trial yield. The hybrid regression line. The hybrid regression line characterises the expected yield performance of a given hybrid as the average yield level changes from low to high. The regression lines of the two hybrids presented indicate the relative performance of each hybrid over the range of yield levels represented. It is important not to extend hybrid s beyond the boundaries of data points plotted on the graph. The regression is only accurate over the range of available trial yields. Yield Kilograms per Hectare P8805 R² = H20 R² = P H20 Linear P8805 Linear 38H MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 11

15 MILK PROFIT CALCULATION Page 12 MILK PROFIT CALCULATION Hybrid summaries in this publication use the following equations to calculate milk profit ($/ha) Milk Profit = Milksolids Yield/ha x Milk Payout Silage Production Costs/ha * Where Milksolids Yield/ha = Silage Yield x 100 g Milksolids per kgdm fed Milk Payout is based on an expected milksolids payout of $8.75/kg as announced by Fonterra on 26 March ( * A detailed listing of the cost for last season s production was published in the Pioneer Maize Silage 2013/2014 catalogue page 37. MAIZE FOR SILAGE hybrid performance & positioning information 2014 Page 12

16 Maize silage hybrid for all years cumulative up to 2014 harvest NORTHLAND & SOUTH AUCKLAND PAIRED SILAGE COMPARISONS OF PIONEER BRAND MAIZE HYBRIDS Page 13

17 COMPARISON INDEX FOR NORTHLAND & SOUTH AUCKLAND Page 14 Page Page 31G66 33M54 15 P G26 Z71-F M M54 33G G P88 18 Olympiad 19 P P P88 33M54 18 P P P P P P88 26 P P P M P88 22 P P P P G M P88 32 Olympiad 33 P Z71-F A30 36M28 23 P M28 35A30 23 P P A30 24 Maximus 25 P P

18 31G66 compared with 33M54 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 31G66 (%) 33M54 (%) advantage to 31G66 31G66 to 31G66 ($/ha) 3 32 trials 32.5 % 34.8 % kgdm/ha + $207 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids G66 R² = M54 R² = G66 33M54 Linear 31G66 Linear 33M54 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Northland & South Auckland Page 15

19 33G26 compared with Z71-F1 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 33G26 (%) Z71-F1 (%) advantage to 33G26 Page 16 33G26 to 33G26 ($/ha) 3 10 trials 37.4 % 35.8 % kgdm/ha + $1546 /ha 33G26 outyields Z71-F1 (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product G26 R² = Z71-F1 R² = G26 Z71-F1 Linear 33G26 Linear Z71-F Northland & South Auckland

20 33M54 compared with 33G26 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 33M54 (%) 33G26 (%) advantage to 33M54 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 7 33 trials 35.2 % 35.5 % kgdm/ha + $1183 /ha 33M54 outyields 33G26 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product M54 R² = G26 R² = M54 33G26 Linear 33M54 Linear 33G Northland & South Auckland Page 17

21 33M54 compared with 34P88 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 33M54 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to 33M54 Page 18 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 6 51 trials 35.8 % 38.1 % kgdm/ha + $817 /ha 33M54 outyields 34P88 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product M54 R² = P88 R² = M54 34P88 Linear 33M54 Linear 34P Northland & South Auckland

22 33M54 compared with Olympiad for silage. Northland & South Auckland 33M54 (%) Olympiad (%) advantage to 33M54 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 4 21 trials 37.3 % 36.1 % kgdm/ha + $2457 /ha 33M54 outyields Olympiad (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product M54 R² = Olympiad R² = M54 Olympiad Linear 33M54 Linear Olympiad Northland & South Auckland Page 19

23 33M54 compared with P1253 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 33M54 (%) P1253 (%) advantage to 33M54 Page 20 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 4 43 trials 35.8 % 37.9 % kgdm/ha + $1347 /ha 33M54 outyields P1253 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product M54 R² = P1253 R² = M54 P1253 Linear 33M54 Linear P Northland & South Auckland

24 34P88 compared with P0791 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 34P88 (%) P0791 (%) advantage to 34P88 34P88 to 34P88 ($/ha) 5 26 trials 39.3 % 39.3 % kgdm/ha + $210 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P88 R² = P0791 R² = P88 P0791 Linear 34P88 Linear P Northland & South Auckland Page 21

25 34P88 compared with P1253 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 34P88 (%) P1253 (%) advantage to 34P88 Page 22 34P88 to 34P88 ($/ha) 4 37 trials 38.4 % 37.9 % + 11 kgdm/ha + $10 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P88 R² = P1253 R² = P88 P1253 Linear 34P88 Linear P Northland & South Auckland

26 35A30 compared with 36M28 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 35A30 (%) 36M28 (%) advantage to 35A30 35A30 to 35A30 ($/ha) 5 21 trials 37.0 % 39.5 % kgdm/ha + $1382 /ha 35A30 outyields 36M28 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product A30 R² = M28 R² = A30 36M28 Linear 35A30 Linear 36M Northland & South Auckland Page 23

27 35A30 compared with P0791 for silage. Northland & South Auckland 35A30 (%) P0791 (%) advantage to 35A30 Page 24 35A30 to 35A30 ($/ha) 5 23 trials 38.4 % 38.0 % kgdm/ha + $154 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product A30 R² = P0791 R² = A30 P0791 Linear 35A30 Linear P Northland & South Auckland

28 P0791 compared with Maximus for silage. Northland & South Auckland P0791 (%) Maximus (%) advantage to P0791 P0791 to P0791 ($/ha) 4 17 trials 37.6 % 37.9 % kgdm/ha + $1637 /ha P0791 outyields Maximus (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P0791 R² = Maximus R² = P0791 Maximus Linear P0791 Linear Maximus Northland & South Auckland Page 25

29 P0891 compared with 34P88 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P0891 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to P0891 Page 26 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 5 27 trials 39.0 % 38.6 % kgdm/ha + $126 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P0891 R² = P88 R² = P P88 Linear P0891 Linear 34P Northland & South Auckland

30 P0891 compared with P0791 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P0891 (%) P0791 (%) advantage to P0891 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 5 27 trials 39.4 % 38.6 % kgdm/ha + $405 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P0891 R² = P0791 R² = P0891 P0791 Linear P0891 Linear P0791 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Northland & South Auckland Page 27

31 P0891 compared with P1253 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P0891 (%) P1253 (%) advantage to P0891 Page 28 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 3 24 trials 39.8 % 38.2 % + 69 kgdm/ha + $60 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P0891 R² = P1253 R² = P0891 P1253 Linear P0891 Linear P Northland & South Auckland

32 P1253 compared with P0791 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1253 (%) P0791 (%) advantage to P1253 P1253 to P1253 ($/ha) 2 18 trials 39.2 % 39.5 % kgdm/ha + $1041 /ha P1253 outyields P0791 (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings P1253 R² = P0791 R² = P1253 P0791 Linear P1253 Linear P0791 CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product Northland & South Auckland Page 29

33 P1636 compared with 31G66 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1636 (%) 31G66 (%) advantage to P1636 Page 30 P1636 to P1636 ($/ha) 2 18 trials 33.7 % 32.5 % kgdm/ha + $918 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P1636 R² = G66 R² = P G66 Linear P1636 Linear 31G66 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Northland & South Auckland

34 P1636 compared with 33M54 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1636 (%) 33M54 (%) advantage to P1636 P1636 to P1636 ($/ha) 2 20 trials 34.2 % 34.9 % kgdm/ha + $678 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P1636 R² = M54 R² = P M54 Linear P1636 Linear 33M54 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Northland & South Auckland Page 31

35 P1636 compared with 34P88 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1636 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to P1636 Page 32 P1636 to P1636 ($/ha) 2 15 trials 33.7 % 37.2 % kgdm/ha + $1724 /ha P1636 outyields 34P88 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P1636 R² = P88 R² = P P88 Linear P1636 Linear 34P88 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Northland & South Auckland

36 P1636 compared with Olympiad for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1636 (%) Olympiad (%) advantage to P1636 P1636 to P1636 ($/ha) 2 9 trials 34.8 % 34.9 % kgdm/ha + $3356 /ha P1636 outyields Olympiad (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P1636 R² = Olympiad R² = P1636 Olympiad Linear P1636 Linear Olympiad Northland & South Auckland Page 33

37 P1636 compared with P1253 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1636 (%) P1253 (%) advantage to P1636 Page 34 P1636 to P1636 ($/ha) 2 17 trials 34.2 % 37.0 % kgdm/ha + $1285 /ha P1636 outyields P1253 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P1636 R² = P1253 R² = P1636 P1253 Linear P1636 Linear P Northland & South Auckland

38 P1636 compared with Z71-F1 for silage. Northland & South Auckland P1636 (%) Z71-F1 (%) advantage to P1636 P1636 to P1636 ($/ha) 2 12 trials 35.0 % 35.4 % kgdm/ha + $1801 /ha P1636 outyields Z71-F1 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P1636 R² = Z71-F1 R² = P1636 Z71-F1 Linear P1636 Linear Z71-F Northland & South Auckland Page 35

39 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: NORTHLAND & SOUTH AUCKLAND Page 36 Ashby Family Trust Location: HELENSVILLE Planting Date: 16/10/2013 Harvest Date: 25/02/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 132 Trial Altitude: 19 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) X13J G P A P P P P Average Cashin, Simon Location: WAITAKERE Planting Date: 15/11/2013 Harvest Date: 4/04/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 140 Trial Altitude: 35 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 31G P P P M X18H P P P Average Flintoff, Carl Location: MANGAWHAI Planting Date: 7/10/2013 Harvest Date: 5/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 149 Trial Altitude: 106 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P G P M P P P Average Flood, Daniel & Carolyn Location: OKAIHAU Planting Date: 29/10/2013 Harvest Date: 28/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 150 Trial Altitude: 247 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P M P X08C G P X18H Average Fox, Graham Location: ARANGA Planting Date: 4/11/2013 Harvest Date: 11/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 127 Trial Altitude: 174 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P Y P P P A P Average Harvey, Paul Location: HOUHORA Planting Date: 14/10/2013 Harvest Date: 26/02/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 135 Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P Average Northland & South Auckland

40 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: NORTHLAND & SOUTH AUCKLAND Hukerenui School (Bastienne Kruger) Location: HUKERENUI Planting Date: 25/10/2013 Harvest Date: 4/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 130 Trial Altitude: 126 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P X08C P P P A P P Average Kaycee Farms Ltd (K & C Tucker) Location: TAPORA Planting Date: 22/10/2013 Harvest Date: 27/02/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 128 Trial Altitude: 17 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P X08H P X08C P M G P X15G Average King, Logan Location: WAIPAPAKAURI Planting Date: 10/11/2013 Harvest Date: 26/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 136 Trial Altitude: 20 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 31G P P M P X13J X18H Average Konings, Mike Location: WHANGAREI Planting Date: 9/11/2013 Harvest Date: 2/04/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 144 Trial Altitude: 98 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P M X18H P P G Average Landcorp Farming Limited (Sweetwater) Location: KAITAIA Planting Date: 10/10/2013 Harvest Date: 3/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 144 Trial Altitude: 15 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P X13J P P A P G P Average Leeuwenburg, Ian & Gill Location: PARAKAO Planting Date: 4/11/2013 Harvest Date: 25/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 141 Trial Altitude: 49 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 31G P P P P M X13J P Average Northland & South Auckland Page 37

41 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: NORTHLAND & SOUTH AUCKLAND Page 38 Okaihau Pastoral Limited (Foster, J&J) Location: OKAIHAU Planting Date: 18/10/2013 Harvest Date: 7/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 140 Trial Altitude: 260 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P X08H P P P P P Average Phillips, John Location: DARGAVILLE Planting Date: 12/12/2013 Harvest Date: 22/04/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 131 Trial Altitude: 9 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P X08H P P P P P P Average Pow, Tom Location: RUAKAKA Planting Date: 28/10/2013 Harvest Date: 6/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 129 Trial Altitude: 10 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P P P Average Robinson, David & Tina Location: TANGATERORIA Planting Date: 30/10/2013 Harvest Date: 10/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 131 Trial Altitude: 12 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P M P P G Average Northland & South Auckland

42 Maize silage hybrid for all years cumulative up to 2014 harvest BAY OF PLENTY, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY PAIRED SILAGE COMPARISONS OF PIONEER BRAND MAIZE HYBRIDS Page 39

43 COMPARISON INDEX FOR BAY OF PLENTY, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY Page 40 Page Page Page 33G26 33M M54 33G P88 42 Olympiad 43 P P P88 33M54 42 Maximus 44 Olympiad 45 P P P Y12 P H20 P V12 CTL85 58 P P T45 P P0021 CTL CTL96 60 G49-T9 61 P P PAC P P88 46 Maximus 47 P P Z71-F1 48 P M P88 50 P P Z71-F1 52 P M P88 54 Olympiad 55 P P P V T45 65 CTL85 66 P Y H V12 69 CTL96 70 PAC P9721 P P PAC P9911 CTL96 73 N36-J2 74 P P PAC301 77

44 33M54 compared with 33G26 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay 33M54 (%) 33G26 (%) advantage to 33M54 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 7 38 trials 34.9 % 35.1 % kgdm/ha + $117 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids M54 R² = G26 R² = M54 33G26 Linear 33M54 Linear 33G26 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 41

45 33M54 compared with 34P88 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay 33M54 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to 33M54 Page 42 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 8 46 trials 35.4 % 37.5 % kgdm/ha + $191 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product M54 R² = P88 R² = M54 34P88 Linear 33M54 Linear 34P Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

46 33M54 compared with Olympiad for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay 33M54 (%) Olympiad (%) advantage to 33M54 33M54 to 33M54 ($/ha) 7 18 trials 34.9 % 34.0 % kgdm/ha + $2263 /ha 33M54 outyields Olympiad (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product M54 R² = Olympiad R² = M54 Olympiad Linear 33M54 Linear Olympiad Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 43

47 34P88 compared with Maximus for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay 34P88 (%) Maximus (%) advantage to 34P88 Page 44 34P88 to 34P88 ($/ha) 5 8 trials 36.9 % 36.8 % kgdm/ha + $2704 /ha 34P88 outyields Maximus (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P88 R² = Maximus R² = P88 Maximus Linear 34P88 Linear Maximus Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

48 34P88 compared with Olympiad for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay 34P88 (%) Olympiad (%) advantage to 34P88 34P88 to 34P88 ($/ha) 6 16 trials 36.3 % 34.0 % kgdm/ha + $2036 /ha 34P88 outyields Olympiad (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P88 R² = Olympiad R² = P88 Olympiad Linear 34P88 Linear Olympiad Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 45

49 P0791 compared with 34P88 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0791 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to P0791 Page 46 P0791 to P0791 ($/ha) 4 32 trials 37.5 % 37.4 % kgdm/ha + $91 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P0791 R² = P88 R² = P P88 Linear P0791 Linear 34P Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

50 P0791 compared with Maximus for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0791 (%) Maximus (%) advantage to P0791 P0791 to P0791 ($/ha) 4 12 trials 34.1 % 34.8 % kgdm/ha + $1491 /ha P0791 outyields Maximus (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings P0791 R² = Maximus R² = P0791 Maximus Linear P0791 Linear Maximus CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 47

51 P0791 compared with Z71-F1 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0791 (%) Z71-F1 (%) advantage to P0791 Page 48 P0791 to P0791 ($/ha) 3 13 trials 37.4 % 33.3 % kgdm/ha + $1567 /ha P0791 outyields Z71-F1 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P0791 R² = Z71-F1 R² = P0791 Z71-F1 Linear P0791 Linear Z71-F Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

52 P0891 compared with 33M54 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0891 (%) 33M54 (%) advantage to P0891 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 3 17 trials 39.6 % 35.2 % kgdm/ha + $519 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P0891 R² = M54 R² = P M54 Linear P0891 Linear 33M54 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 49

53 P0891 compared with 34P88 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0891 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to P0891 Page 50 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 5 43 trials 38.9 % 37.2 % kgdm/ha + $244 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P0891 R² = P88 R² = P P88 Linear P0891 Linear 34P Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

54 P0891 compared with P0791 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0891 (%) P0791 (%) advantage to P0891 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 4 29 trials 38.4 % 37.2 % kgdm/ha + $209 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P0891 R² = P0791 R² = P0891 P0791 Linear P0891 Linear P0791 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 51

55 P0891 compared with Z71-F1 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P0891 (%) Z71-F1 (%) advantage to P0891 Page 52 P0891 to P0891 ($/ha) 4 21 trials 38.2 % 33.5 % kgdm/ha + $1258 /ha P0891 outyields Z71-F1 (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings P0891 R² = Z71-F1 R² = P0891 Z71-F1 Linear P0891 Linear Z71-F1 CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

56 P1253 compared with 33M54 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P1253 (%) 33M54 (%) advantage to P1253 P1253 to P1253 ($/ha) 4 36 trials 37.6 % 35.4 % kgdm/ha + $449 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P1253 R² = M54 R² = P M54 Linear P1253 Linear 33M Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 53

57 P1253 compared with 34P88 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P1253 (%) 34P88 (%) advantage to P1253 Page 54 P1253 to P1253 ($/ha) 4 46 trials 37.4 % 37.5 % kgdm/ha + $520 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P1253 R² = P88 R² = P P88 Linear P1253 Linear 34P88 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

58 P1253 compared with Olympiad for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P1253 (%) Olympiad (%) advantage to P1253 P1253 to P1253 ($/ha) 4 10 trials 36.0 % 33.5 % kgdm/ha + $1591 /ha P1253 outyields Olympiad (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P1253 R² = Olympiad R² = P1253 Olympiad Linear P1253 Linear Olympiad Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 55

59 P1253 compared with P0791 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P1253 (%) P0791 (%) advantage to P1253 Page 56 P1253 to P1253 ($/ha) 4 29 trials 37.2 % 37.8 % kgdm/ha + $215 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P1253 R² = P0791 R² = P1253 P0791 Linear P1253 Linear P0791 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

60 P1253 compared with P0891 for silage. Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke's Bay P1253 (%) P0891 (%) advantage to P1253 P1253 to P1253 ($/ha) 3 31 trials 37.0 % 38.8 % kgdm/ha + $165 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P1253 R² = P0891 R² = P1253 P0891 Linear P1253 Linear P0891 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 57

61 38V12 compared with CTL85 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers 38V12 (%) CTL85 (%) advantage to 38V12 Page 58 38V12 to 38V12 ($/ha) 7 62 trials 39.5 % 41.8 % kgdm/ha + $1252 /ha 38V12 outyields CTL85 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings V12 R² = CTL85 R² = V12 CTL85 Linear 38V12 Linear CTL85 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

62 P0021 compared with CTL100 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P0021 (%) CTL100 (%) advantage to P0021 P0021 to P0021 ($/ha) 4 43 trials 41.5 % 41.8 % kgdm/ha + $855 /ha P0021 outyields CTL100 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P0021 R² = CTL100 R² = P0021 CTL100 Linear P0021 Linear CTL Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 59

63 P0021 compared with CTL96 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P0021 (%) CTL96 (%) advantage to P0021 Page 60 P0021 to P0021 ($/ha) 3 23 trials 39.6 % 38.9 % kgdm/ha + $2747 /ha P0021 outyields CTL96 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product P0021 R² = CTL96 R² = P0021 CTL96 Linear P0021 Linear CTL Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

64 P0021 compared with G49-T9 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P0021 (%) G49-T9 (%) advantage to P0021 P0021 to P0021 ($/ha) 2 18 trials 41.4 % 39.5 % kgdm/ha + $1322 /ha P0021 outyields G49-T9 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product P0021 R² = G49-T9 R² = P0021 G49-T9 Linear P0021 Linear G49-T Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 61

65 P0021 compared with P9721 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P0021 (%) P9721 (%) advantage to P0021 Page 62 P0021 to P0021 ($/ha) 3 40 trials 40.3 % 40.6 % kgdm/ha + $439 /ha P0021 outyields P9721 (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings P0021 R² = P9721 R² = P0021 P9721 Linear P0021 Linear P9721 CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

66 P0021 compared with PAC301 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P0021 (%) PAC301 (%) advantage to P0021 P0021 to P0021 ($/ha) 2 16 trials 41.8 % 40.2 % kgdm/ha + $3066 /ha P0021 outyields PAC301 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P0021 R² = PAC301 R² = P0021 PAC301 Linear P0021 Linear PAC301 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 63

67 P8805 compared with 38V12 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P8805 (%) 38V12 (%) advantage to P8805 Page 64 P8805 to P8805 ($/ha) 3 25 trials 38.8 % 37.5 % kgdm/ha + $372 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids P8805 R² = V12 R² = P V12 Linear P8805 Linear 38V12 NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

68 P8805 compared with 39T45 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P8805 (%) 39T45 (%) advantage to P8805 P8805 to P8805 ($/ha) (See page 12 for formula) 3 18 trials 38.4 % 40.4 % kgdm/ha + $1899 /ha P8805 outyields 39T45 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P8805 R² = T45 R² = P T45 Linear P8805 Linear 39T45 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 65

69 P8805 compared with CTL85 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P8805 (%) CTL85 (%) advantage to P8805 Page 66 P8805 to P8805 ($/ha) 2 15 trials 38.4 % 39.7 % kgdm/ha + $1386 /ha P8805 outyields CTL85 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product P8805 R² = CTL85 R² = P8805 CTL85 Linear P8805 Linear CTL Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

70 P9400 compared with 37Y12 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9400 (%) 37Y12 (%) advantage to P9400 P9400 to P9400 ($/ha) 5 33 trials 38.1 % 38.4 % kgdm/ha + $634 /ha P9400 outyields 37Y12 (probability < 0.10). This comparison is not statistically "significant" scientifically, but is a commercially acceptable indication that may assist with product positioning. Plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. CA CA denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P9400 R² = Y12 R² = P Y12 Linear P9400 Linear 37Y Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 67

71 P9400 compared with 38H20 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9400 (%) 38H20 (%) advantage to P9400 Page 68 P9400 to P9400 ($/ha) 6 89 trials 38.6 % 41.6 % kgdm/ha + $846 /ha P9400 outyields 38H20 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P9400 R² = H20 R² = P H20 Linear P9400 Linear 38H20 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

72 P9400 compared with 38V12 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9400 (%) 38V12 (%) advantage to P9400 P9400 to P9400 ($/ha) 6 57 trials 37.2 % 39.9 % kgdm/ha + $961 /ha P9400 outyields 38V12 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P9400 R² = V12 R² = P V12 Linear P9400 Linear 38V12 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 69

73 P9400 compared with CTL96 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9400 (%) CTL96 (%) advantage to P9400 Page 70 P9400 to P9400 ($/ha) 4 31 trials 41.2 % 38.7 % kgdm/ha + $2651 /ha P9400 outyields CTL96 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P9400 R² = CTL96 R² = P9400 CTL96 Linear P9400 Linear CTL96 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

74 P9400 compared with PAC504 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9400 (%) PAC504 (%) advantage to P9400 P9400 to P9400 ($/ha) 5 32 trials 41.8 % 41.1 % kgdm/ha + $1436 /ha P9400 outyields PAC504 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P9400 R² = PAC504 R² = P9400 PAC504 Linear P9400 Linear PAC504 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 71

75 P9721 compared with PAC504 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9721 (%) PAC504 (%) advantage to P9721 Page 72 P9721 to P9721 ($/ha) 2 12 trials 42.0 % 41.4 % kgdm/ha + $1562 /ha P9721 outyields PAC504 (probability < 0.05). This is a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Confidently plant the "winning hybrid", but also consult the trait ratings. Star denotes the significance level of this comparison and is not intended to be a product P9721 R² = PAC504 R² = P9721 PAC504 Linear P9721 Linear PAC Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

76 P9911 compared with CTL96 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9911 (%) CTL96 (%) advantage to P9911 P9911 to P9911 ($/ha) 1 9 trials 38.5 % 38.0 % kgdm/ha + $3756 /ha P9911 outyields CTL96 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product P9911 R² = CTL96 R² = P9911 CTL96 Linear P9911 Linear CTL Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 73

77 P9911 compared with N36-J2 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9911 (%) N36-J2 (%) advantage to P9911 Page 74 P9911 to P9911 ($/ha) 2 8 trials 39.0 % 40.6 % kgdm/ha + $3427 /ha P9911 outyields N36-J2 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product P9911 R² = N36-J2 R² = P9911 N36-J2 Linear P9911 Linear N36-J Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

78 P9911 compared with P0021 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9911 (%) P0021 (%) advantage to P9911 P9911 to P9911 ($/ha) 2 37 trials 38.7 % 40.0 % kgdm/ha + $579 /ha This is not a significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield cannot be claimed. This either means more trial locations and are needed to achieve significance or there is no yield difference between the hybrids. Ignore the yield comparison for hybrid selection. Refer primarily to trait ratings to select between the hybrids. NS NS denotes that this comparison is "not significant" and is not intended to be a product P9911 R² = P0021 R² = P9911 P0021 Linear P9911 Linear P Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 75

79 P9911 compared with P9721 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9911 (%) P9721 (%) advantage to P9911 Page 76 P9911 to P9911 ($/ha) 2 34 trials 36.7 % 37.2 % kgdm/ha + $1191 /ha P9911 outyields P9721 (probability < 0.01). This is a highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings. Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product P9911 R² = P9721 R² = P9911 P9721 Linear P9911 Linear P Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

80 P9911 compared with PAC301 for silage. Waikato data for the information of Central Plateau growers P9911 (%) PAC301 (%) advantage to P9911 P9911 to P9911 ($/ha) 2 15 trials 40.2 % 39.9 % kgdm/ha + $4307 /ha P9911 outyields PAC301 (probability < 0.001). This is a very highly significant result. Hybrid superiority for yield is shown. Plant the "winning hybrid" with a very high level of confidence, but also consult the trait ratings P9911 R² = PAC301 R² = P9911 PAC301 Linear P9911 Linear PAC301 Stars denote the significance level of this comparison and are not intended to be a product Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 77

81 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: BAY OF PLENTY, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY Page 78 Barr, Alan Location: AWAKERI Planting Date: 1/11/2013 Harvest Date: 11/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 130 Trial Altitude: 17 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 33M P P P P P M X08C P Average Grant Farms Ltd - Trial 1 Location: TE TEKO Planting Date: 18/10/2013 Harvest Date: 13/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 146 Trial Altitude: 12 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 33M P P M P P G P P Average Grant Farms Ltd - Trial 2 Location: TE TEKO Planting Date: 13/11/2013 Harvest Date: 1/04/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 139 Trial Altitude: 12 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 33M P M P X08C A P P Average Hawkes Bay Dairies (J D Hopkins) Location: HASTINGS Planting Date: 10/10/2013 Harvest Date: 10/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 151 Trial Altitude: 189 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P P P A P Average Jordaan, Japie Location: TE PUKE Planting Date: 14/10/2013 Harvest Date: 28/02/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 137 Trial Altitude: 10 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P M P X13J P P Average Mathis, Gerald and Kylee Location: GALATEA Planting Date: 13/11/2013 Harvest Date: 21/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 128 Trial Altitude: 155 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 38V P M P P P P P Average Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

82 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: BAY OF PLENTY, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY Mathis, Steve Location: PATOKA Planting Date: 14/10/2013 Harvest Date: 20/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 157 Trial Altitude: 326 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P H P P X00D V Average Rawai Agriculture Limited (R Dakins) Location: TAKAPAU Planting Date: 19/10/2013 Harvest Date: 1/04/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 164 Trial Altitude: 241 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P X00C V P Y P P Average Riverlock Farms Ltd (Jim Brown) Location: OPOTIKI Planting Date: 1/11/2013 Harvest Date: 8/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 127 Trial Altitude: 11 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P P G M X13L Average Van den Broek, Chris Location: GALATEA Planting Date: 22/10/2013 Harvest Date: 25/02/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 126 Trial Altitude: 232 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 35A P P X08C P P Average Van den Broek, Wayne Location: GALATEA Planting Date: 9/11/2013 Harvest Date: 19/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 130 Trial Altitude: 176 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P P P A P Average Wardlaw, Allen Location: WAIMANA Planting Date: 23/10/2013 Harvest Date: 7/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 135 Trial Altitude: 49 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) 34P X08C P P P P P P Average Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 79

83 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: BAY OF PLENTY, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY Page 80 Webb, Bill - Trial 1 Location: WELCOME BAY Planting Date: 29/09/2013 Harvest Date: 21/02/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 145 Trial Altitude: 30 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P X08C P P P P X12N Average Webb, Bill - Trial 3 Location: PAENGAROA Planting Date: 25/10/2013 Harvest Date: 12/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 138 Trial Altitude: 1 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P M P X12N P P Average Webb, Bill - Trial 5 Location: ROTORUA Planting Date: 31/10/2013 Harvest Date: 10/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 130 Trial Altitude: 288 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P V P P M P Average Webb, Bill - Trial 2 Location: WELCOME BAY Planting Date: 27/10/2013 Harvest Date: 14/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 138 Trial Altitude: 12 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P X12N P A P Average Webb, Bill - Trial 4 Location: TE PUKE Planting Date: 24/10/2013 Harvest Date: 12/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 139 Trial Altitude: 16 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P P P X12N P G M Average Whakatohea Maori Trustees Location: OPOTIKI Planting Date: 19/10/2013 Harvest Date: 4/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 136 Trial Altitude: 10 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P M P P P P P X08C Average Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay

84 INDIVIDUAL FARMER TRIAL RESULTS: BAY OF PLENTY, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY Zink, Eric Location: EDGECUMBE Planting Date: 30/10/2013 Harvest Date: 20/03/2014 Days from planting to harvest: 141 Trial Altitude: 6 metres Hybrid Drymatter (%) Yield (tdm/ha) P P M G P X08C P M Average Bay of Plenty, Gisborne & Hawke s Bay Page 81

85

86 THANK YOU TO THE 2013/2014 NORTHLAND, SOUTH AUCKLAND, BOP, GISBORNE & HAWKE S BAY TRIAL CO-OPERATORS The results of the extensive research trial programme in this publication are only made possible with the willing assistance and co-operation of both farmers and contractors. Special thanks to all those involved with planting and harvesting silage and grain trials pictured and listed on the following pages. Page 83 Page 83

87 Thank you Page 84

88 Thank you Page 85

89 Thank you Page 86

90 Thank you Page 87

91 Thank you Page 88

92 Thank you Page 89

93 Thank you Page 90

94 Thank you Page 91

95 Thank you Page 92

96 Thanks also go to those farmers in our trial co-operator programme whose photos were unavailable: Akel Partnership Ashby Family Trust Earle Bragg Dovaston Family Trust Graham Fox Wallace Fulton Paul Harvey Logan King Michael Konings Landcorp Farming Limited (Sweetwater) Ian & Gill Leeuwenburg Gerald & Kylee Mathis Steve Mathis Kevin Rountree Graham Fox Michael Konings Thank you Page 93

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University   Web: Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org First of of all, all, let s let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Genetic modification of corn has been

More information

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Selecting Hybrids Wisely First of of all, let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org Genetic modification of corn has been occurring

More information

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37

More information

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee 1992 REPORT Ontario Soybean Variety Trials Conducted in 1989-91 by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee ONTARIO OIL & PROTEIN SEED CROP COMMITTEE This organization is made up of representatives

More information

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension

More information

DuPont Biofuels. Technology that Fuels. Russ Sanders Marketing Director Pioneer Hi-Bred. Citigroup October 2, 2007

DuPont Biofuels. Technology that Fuels. Russ Sanders Marketing Director Pioneer Hi-Bred. Citigroup October 2, 2007 DuPont Biofuels Russ Sanders Marketing Director Pioneer Hi-Bred Technology that Fuels Citigroup October 2, 2007 Regulation G The attached charts include company information that does not conform to generally

More information

PVP Field Calibration and Accuracy of Torque Wrenches. Proceedings of ASME PVP ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference PVP2011-

PVP Field Calibration and Accuracy of Torque Wrenches. Proceedings of ASME PVP ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference PVP2011- Proceedings of ASME PVP2011 2011 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels July 17-21, & Piping 2011, Division Baltimore, Conference Maryland PVP2011 July

More information

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009 Technical Papers supporting SAP 29 A meta-analysis of boiler test efficiencies to compare independent and manufacturers results Reference no. STP9/B5 Date last amended 25 March 29 Date originated 6 October

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007 Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 007 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.

More information

2004 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials

2004 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials 2004 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials Calumet Kanawha Nashua Pocahontas Hampton Harlan Radcliffe Dayton Carroll Ames Rippey Ankeny Grinnell Keystone Williamsburg Atlantic Lewis Pella Fairfield Crawfordsville

More information

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA Introduction Tobacco varieties play an essential role in yield and quality improvement programs. Moreover, a vital part

More information

Crop Heat Units for Corn and Other Warm-Season Crops in Ontario

Crop Heat Units for Corn and Other Warm-Season Crops in Ontario 1 of 6 8/24/2006 9:31 AM Agdex#: 111/31 Publication Date: 10/93 Order#: 93-119 Last Reviewed: 01/97 Title: Crop Heat Units for Corn and Other Warm Season Crops in Ontario Division: History: Agriculture

More information

Forage Harvester Evaluation

Forage Harvester Evaluation Forage Harvester Evaluation November 2011 Brian Marsh, Farm Advisor Kern County Forage harvester efficiency is one of the factors to be considered in obtaining a unit. Harvester capacity needs to be matched

More information

Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010

Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010 Virginia Tech Corn Silage Testing 2010 2010 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 3011-1518 Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color,

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Page 26 revised data as of Nov. 29, 2017. Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017 Quality Factors 1 Dry Matter Yield Milk Production

More information

Applying Molecular Marker information and Data Mining to a Commercial Breeding Pipeline

Applying Molecular Marker information and Data Mining to a Commercial Breeding Pipeline Applying Molecular Marker information and Data Mining to a Commercial Breeding Pipeline David V. Butruille, Ph.D. Data Mining Lead - Breeding Technology Monsanto Company Ankeny, IA ISU Plant Breeding Lecture

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 57 FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Grain and Silage Performance Experiment: 02PD Trial ID: 6051 Year: 2016 Personnel: Location: Supported By: UW: Joe Lauer, Kent

More information

Forage Harvester Evaluation

Forage Harvester Evaluation Forage Harvester Evaluation November 2012 Brian Marsh, Farm Advisor Kern County Forage harvester efficiency is one of the factors to be considered in obtaining a unit. Harvester capacity needs to be matched

More information

Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests

Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests February 2017 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences

More information

Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. March 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA

More information

KERN FIELD CROPS. Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA

KERN FIELD CROPS. Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA University of California Cooperative Extension KERN FIELD CROPS Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93307 661-868-6218 Forage Harvester Evaluation Brian Marsh, Farm Advisor October 2011

More information

Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard

Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard We have carried out a detailed statistical analysis between the results from the PIRA and PUMA tests for Year 2 and Year 6 and the scaled

More information

Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard

Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard We have carried out a detailed statistical analysis between the results from the PIRA and PUMA tests for Year 2 and Year 6 and the scaled

More information

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics ST7003-1 TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Computer Science and Statistics Postgraduate Certificate in Statistics Hilary Term 2015

More information

Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences from

More information

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests February 2017 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences

More information

Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP

Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP October 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA ) is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,

More information

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWIN FALLS COUNTY 2013 SILAGE CORN VARIETY TRIALS. Steven L. Hines 1 ABSTRACT

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWIN FALLS COUNTY 2013 SILAGE CORN VARIETY TRIALS. Steven L. Hines 1 ABSTRACT UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWIN FALLS COUNTY 2013 SILAGE CORN VARIETY TRIALS Steven L. Hines 1 ABSTRACT Idaho is ranked 3rd in the nation for milk production and 4 th in number of dairy cows. As the Idaho dairy

More information

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION

More information

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends K. Carey, A.J. Porter, K.S. Jordan and E.M. Lyons Department of Plant Agriculture and the Guelph Turfgrass Institute, University of Guelph, Ontario.

More information

Height, Yield and Oil Content of Short-Stature Sunflower (Helianthus annus) vs. Conventional Height Sunflower in the Southern High Plains

Height, Yield and Oil Content of Short-Stature Sunflower (Helianthus annus) vs. Conventional Height Sunflower in the Southern High Plains Height, Yield and Oil Content of Short-Stature Sunflower (Helianthus annus) vs. Conventional Height Sunflower in the Southern High Plains Dr. Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, TX (806) 746-6101,

More information

RUMBLE STRIPS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

RUMBLE STRIPS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RUMBLE STRIPS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Rumble strips are a key safety initiative that help prevent crashes by providing drivers with a wake up call if they stray over the edgeline or centreline. The NZ Transport

More information

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education * 5 0 4 6 1 4 8 1 7 * 0680/41 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Alternative to Coursework May/June 13

More information

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,

More information

Wildland Solutions RDM Monitoring Procedure Keith Guenther November 2007 version

Wildland Solutions RDM Monitoring Procedure Keith Guenther November 2007 version Wildland Solutions RDM Monitoring Procedure Keith Guenther November 2007 version Annually create an RDM zone map and a pasture success map with supporting information collected at monitoring reference

More information

Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 2011

Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 2011 Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 211 1 The Scope At an average age of 12.7 years in 21, New Zealand has one of the oldest light vehicle fleets in the developed world. This report looks at some of the

More information

Varietal Trials Results

Varietal Trials Results Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating

More information

Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. March 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association

More information

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide NDSU EXTENSION A1105-18 North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide Hans Kandel (NDSU Main Station); Greg Endres, Mike Ostlie, Blaine Schatz and Steve Zwinger (Carrington Research

More information

Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association

More information

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils Manjula Nathan, Robert Kallenbach, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri

More information

Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. March 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association

More information

Oilseeds and Products

Oilseeds and Products Oilseeds and Products Oilseeds compete with major grains for area. As a result, weather impacts soybeans, rapeseed, and sunflowerseed similarly to grain and other crops grown in the same regions. The same

More information

Inheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet

Inheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet Inheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet Andrea Maas 1 * and Xinzhi Ni 1,2 1. Soybean Production Research, Monsanto Company, 36142 E. State Route 10, PO Box 33, Mason City, IL 62664,

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 132 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: J. G. Lauer, J.M. Gaska, K. D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Tillage in Corn and Soybean Production Systems Experiment: 17Tillage

More information

2012 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials

2012 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials 2012 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials Plant Breeding and Genetics 2013-1 Margaret E. Smith Phone: 607-255-1654 Professor Fax: 607-255-6683 Email: mes25@cornell.edu Department of Plant Breeding

More information

Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA

More information

Recommendations and summary of results 2010

Recommendations and summary of results 2010 ecommendations and summary of results 2010 The most promising cultivars of all institutions involved in the small grain industry are annually included in the National Small Grain Cultivar Programme of

More information

Used Vehicle Supply: Future Outlook and the Impact on Used Vehicle Prices

Used Vehicle Supply: Future Outlook and the Impact on Used Vehicle Prices Used Vehicle Supply: Future Outlook and the Impact on Used Vehicle Prices AT A GLANCE When to expect an increase in used supply Recent trends in new vehicle sales Changes in used supply by vehicle segment

More information

ROAD USER BEHAVIOUR SURVEYS

ROAD USER BEHAVIOUR SURVEYS ROAD USER BEHAVIOUR SURVEYS Photo courtesy of NZTA 154 MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN NEW ZEALAND 2012 ROAD USER BEHAVIOUR SURVEYS 155 CONTENTS TABLES Table 1 Safety belt wearing rates for front seat adults

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1-5 RESEARCH PRESENTATION...6-15 I. OBJECTIVE ONE Measure Each Entry s Main and Ratoon Crop Yield and Milling Response With and Without Fungicide Under Intense and

More information

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the TNReady Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the TNReady Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores 2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the TNReady Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores May 2018 NWEA Psychometric Solutions 2018 NWEA. MAP Growth is a registered trademark of NWEA. Disclaimer:

More information

2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases

2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases 2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases D. Peters, C. Gardner, M. Peters, M. Shen USDA-ARS GEM December 7, 2016 GEM IT & YT Statistics Report Dr. Dave Peters and Dr. Mack Shen USDA-ARS NCRPIS

More information

Inflation: the Value of the Pound

Inflation: the Value of the Pound Inflation: the Value of the Pound 1750-1996 Research Paper 97/76 6 June 1997 The Library is often asked about how the purchasing power of the pound has changed over various periods. This Research Paper

More information

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the Performance Evaluation for Alaska s Schools (PEAKS) based on MAP Growth Scores

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the Performance Evaluation for Alaska s Schools (PEAKS) based on MAP Growth Scores 2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the Performance Evaluation for Alaska s Schools (PEAKS) based on MAP Growth Scores June 2018 NWEA Psychometric Solutions 2018 NWEA. MAP Growth is a registered

More information

A3653 Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trials

A3653 Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trials A3653 Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trials Grain Silage Specialty Organic Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo Department of Agronomy, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin

More information

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the NSCAS Summative ELA and Mathematics Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores

2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the NSCAS Summative ELA and Mathematics Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores 2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the NSCAS Summative ELA and Mathematics Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores November 2018 Revised December 19, 2018 NWEA Psychometric Solutions 2018 NWEA.

More information

Taarup 600 series Horizontal auger diet feeders. Greater flexibility with two auger mixing

Taarup 600 series Horizontal auger diet feeders. Greater flexibility with two auger mixing Taarup 600 series Horizontal auger diet feeders Greater flexibility with two auger mixing The two auger system from Taarup Homogenous mixed feed ration The Taarup 600 series is specifically designed to

More information

2002 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials

2002 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials 2002 Iowa Experimental Corn Trials Estherville Canon Falls, MN Calumet Kanawha Nashua Pocahontas Clarion Stanhope Conrad Carroll Ames Tekamah, NE Rippey Harlan Atlantic Lewis Ankeny Pella Williamsburg

More information

NUTRICOTE Dependable controlled feeding of nursery, greenhouse, foliage, landscape, bedding and potted plants.

NUTRICOTE Dependable controlled feeding of nursery, greenhouse, foliage, landscape, bedding and potted plants. Dependable controlled feeding of nursery, greenhouse, foliage, landscape, bedding and potted plants. NUTRICOTE delivers all of these important benefits in a single controlled release fertilizer: Superior

More information

Keeping you cooler in summer and warmer in winter

Keeping you cooler in summer and warmer in winter Keeping you cooler in summer and warmer in winter The Celsius Range from K2 Glass; the Specialist Conservatory Glass Manufacturer At the heart of the Celsius range lies tried and tested technology, specially

More information

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: GAIN Report

More information

Rwanda Biofuels Limited. Powering Rwanda s Development

Rwanda Biofuels Limited. Powering Rwanda s Development Rwanda Biofuels Limited Powering Rwanda s Development 1. Global Bio-Fuel Industry Trans esterification of vegetable oil was conducted as early as 1853, many years prior to the first diesel engine. Trans

More information

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests. February 2017 Updated November 2017

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests. February 2017 Updated November 2017 Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests February 2017 Updated November 2017 2017 NWEA. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be modified or further distributed without

More information

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results 2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;

More information

Analysis of Production and Sales Trend of Indian Automobile Industry

Analysis of Production and Sales Trend of Indian Automobile Industry CHAPTER III Analysis of Production and Sales Trend of Indian Automobile Industry Analysis of production trend Production is the activity of making tangible goods. In the economic sense production means

More information

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia. State: Georgia Grant Number: 08-953 Study Number: 6 LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT Grant Title: State Funded Wildlife Survey Period Covered: July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 Study Title: Wild Turkey Production

More information

LESSON Transmission of Power Introduction

LESSON Transmission of Power Introduction LESSON 3 3.0 Transmission of Power 3.0.1 Introduction Earlier in our previous course units in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, we introduced ourselves to the concept of support and process systems

More information

Westland Monitor Farm Project

Westland Monitor Farm Project Westland Monitor Farm Project Weekly Update 29 May 2015 CO comment With the end of this season and the start of the next imminent, there will be new staff starting out on farms. Ensure you have employment

More information

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test Experiment number...: 03SC11JG Location...: St. Gabriel Research Station St. Gabriel, LA Experimental

More information

Biofuel Potential for Transport Sector in Sudan

Biofuel Potential for Transport Sector in Sudan UNCTAD 17th Africa OILGASMINE, Khartoum, 23-26 November 2015 Extractive Industries and Sustainable Job Creation Biofuel Potential for Transport Sector in Sudan By Abdel Azim Wida a General Directorate

More information

Watermelon Research Report 2011 On-Farm Watermelon Survey

Watermelon Research Report 2011 On-Farm Watermelon Survey Watermelon Research Report 2011 On-Farm Watermelon Survey Gordon Johnson Extension Fruit and Vegetable Specialist University of Delaware Elbert N. & Ann B. Carvel Research and Education Center 16483 County

More information

COATING YOUR WAY TO LOWER EMISSIONS

COATING YOUR WAY TO LOWER EMISSIONS COATING YOUR WAY TO LOWER EMISSIONS With vehicle production growing annually and manufacturers under pressure to reduce exhaust emissions, new and innovative methods will have to be found to increase engine

More information

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Indonesia Oilseeds and

More information

1 Background and definitions

1 Background and definitions EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Europe 2020: Employment Policies European Employment Strategy Youth neither in employment nor education and training (NEET) Presentation

More information

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia. State: Georgia Grant Number: 8-1 Study Number: 6 LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT Grant Title: State Funded Wildlife Survey Period Covered: July 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999 Study Title: Wild Turkey Production

More information

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices Policy Issues Just How Costly Is Gas? Summer 24 Introduction. Across the nation, the price at the pump has reached record highs. From unleaded to premium grade, prices have broken the two-dollar-per-gallon

More information

Monaro Farming Systems Merino Wether Trial

Monaro Farming Systems Merino Wether Trial Monaro Farming Systems Merino Wether Trial 2012-2014 Compiled by: Phil Graham NSW Department of Primary Industries YASS 2014 Team Entrant / Address Owner Details Bloodline 1 Kim Henderson GROGANSWORTH

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 111 Title: Corn - Soybean - Wheat Response to Rotation: Nrate Experiment: 09CSW Trial ID: 5950 Year: 2015 Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Location: Supported By: Site Information Field:

More information

2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey. Final

2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey. Final 2011 Soft Red Winter Wheat Quality Survey Final Survey Overview Illinois Indiana U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas Gulf Tributary SRW States and Areas Surveyed East Coast Tributary Weather and Harvest:

More information

Investigation of Relationship between Fuel Economy and Owner Satisfaction

Investigation of Relationship between Fuel Economy and Owner Satisfaction Investigation of Relationship between Fuel Economy and Owner Satisfaction June 2016 Malcolm Hazel, Consultant Michael S. Saccucci, Keith Newsom-Stewart, Martin Romm, Consumer Reports Introduction This

More information

National Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017

National Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017 National Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017 1 Acknowledgments The successful execution of this project was only possible as a result of excellent co-operation of all stakeholders and the personnel of the

More information

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Silage Test Results Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015 Quality Factors 1 Milk Production 2 Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name

More information

Should You Cull Young Bucks? Insights from the West-East Yana Project at the Faith Ranch

Should You Cull Young Bucks? Insights from the West-East Yana Project at the Faith Ranch Should You Cull Young Bucks? Insights from the West-East Yana Project at the Faith Ranch Spikes How to Lose Control of a Feeding Program On 1,000 Acres With a fawn survival of 65%, production far exceeds

More information

SMART SUN PILOT CREATING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

SMART SUN PILOT CREATING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUTURE SMART SUN PILOT CREATING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUTURE Horizon Power and LandCorp have joined forces to deliver Smart Sun a solar-powered microgrid package providing renewable energy to eligible

More information

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change. Sustainable raw material production for the aviation industry

ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change. Sustainable raw material production for the aviation industry ICAO ICAO Colloquium Colloquium on Aviation Aviation and and Climate Climate Change Change Sustainable raw material production for the aviation industry INDEX A. Raw materials for the aviation industry

More information

BUILDING A ROBUST INDUSTRY INDEX BASED ON LONGITUDINAL DATA

BUILDING A ROBUST INDUSTRY INDEX BASED ON LONGITUDINAL DATA CASE STUDY BUILDING A ROBUST INDUSTRY INDEX BASED ON LONGITUDINAL DATA Hanover built a first of its kind index to diagnose the health, trends, and hidden opportunities for the fastgrowing auto care industry.

More information

1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. COST COMPONENTS 17

1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. COST COMPONENTS 17 CONTENTS - i TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I BACKGROUND 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1. JUSTIFICATION OF MACHINERY 4 1.2. MANAGERIAL APPROACH 5 1.3. MACHINERY MANAGEMENT 5 1.4. THE MECHANICAL SIDE 6 1.5. AN ECONOMICAL

More information

Background and Considerations for Planning Corridor Charging Marcy Rood, Argonne National Laboratory

Background and Considerations for Planning Corridor Charging Marcy Rood, Argonne National Laboratory Background and Considerations for Planning Corridor Charging Marcy Rood, Argonne National Laboratory This document summarizes background of electric vehicle charging technologies, as well as key information

More information

Building a Regional Bioeconomy Seminar. Sustainable Biojet / Green Diesel Solutions. Mike Cey (P.Ag. EMBA) Ag-West Bio Inc. Saskatoon, SK.

Building a Regional Bioeconomy Seminar. Sustainable Biojet / Green Diesel Solutions. Mike Cey (P.Ag. EMBA) Ag-West Bio Inc. Saskatoon, SK. Building a Regional Bioeconomy Seminar Sustainable Biojet / Green Diesel Solutions Mike Cey (P.Ag. EMBA) Ag-West Bio Inc. Saskatoon, SK. Agrisoma: Building a Sustainable Biomass Value Chain Agrisoma is

More information

RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENTS

RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENTS hmhco.com RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENTS HMH Reading Inventory: Estimated Average Annual Growth 3 4 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH) is committed to developing innovative educational programs and professional

More information

A Comparison of Fuel Usage and Harvest Capacity in Self-Propelled Forage Harvesters

A Comparison of Fuel Usage and Harvest Capacity in Self-Propelled Forage Harvesters A Comparison of Fuel Usage and Harvest Capacity in Self-Propelled Forage Harvesters Brian H. Marsh Abstract Self-propelled forage harvesters in the 850 horsepower range were tested over three years for

More information

Project Manager: Neil Beckett. Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett. Approved for issue by: David Darwin

Project Manager: Neil Beckett. Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett. Approved for issue by: David Darwin Annual Weigh-In-Motion (WiM) Report 2010 This report has been prepared for the benefit of the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA). No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this

More information

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices Policy Issues Just How Costly Is Gas? Summer 26 Introduction. Across the nation, the price at the pump has reached record highs. From unleaded to premium grade, prices have broken three dollars per gallon

More information

Understanding the benefits of using a digital valve controller. Mark Buzzell Business Manager, Metso Flow Control

Understanding the benefits of using a digital valve controller. Mark Buzzell Business Manager, Metso Flow Control Understanding the benefits of using a digital valve controller Mark Buzzell Business Manager, Metso Flow Control Evolution of Valve Positioners Digital (Next Generation) Digital (First Generation) Analog

More information

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials C253 Revised Annually 2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials Agricultural Experiment Station South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture This report is available on the World-Wide-Web

More information

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PROJECT TITLE: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr. Michael Giroux, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: mgiroux@montana.edu Phone: (406) 994-7877 Andy Hogg, MSU-Bozeman, MT Email: ahogg@montana.edu

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 22 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, P.J. Flannery, and K.D. Kohn Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity Experiment: 01 Growth and Development

More information