IEEE PSES Energy Efficiency Landscape. Tom Juliano January 22, 2013 San Jose, CA

Transcription

1 IEEE PSES Energy Efficiency Landscape Tom Juliano January 22, 2013 San Jose, CA UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC 2012

2 Agenda Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency Specific HT Product Trends Updates and Developments of Energy Efficiency Regulations Policy Harmonization Data Center & Cloud Computing Activities 2

3 Consumer Electronics fueling increased demand in Global Energy 3

4 Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency $ A.D $ $80.00 $60.00 A.D $40.00 $20.00 $0.00 Resources:inflationdata.com Nominal Oil Price ($/bbl.) Inflation Adjusted Oil Price ($/bbl.) 1. Energy Conservation World Energy Council defined it because of the 1970s energy crisis 2. Energy Efficiency World Energy Council defined it encompasses all changes that result in decreasing the amount of energy used to produce one unit of economic activity G8 discuss EU proposal with International Energy Agency International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation 4

5 The Energy Saving Certifications Trend High-Tech Products User Interfaces Computers Mobile phone Displays TV Data Center Storage Servers Network equipment Slate device UPS Power Supplies Battery Chargers 5

6 Going Green is Going Global Americas Canada / Natural Resources Canada US EPA / ENERGY STAR US Department of Energy US California Energy Commission US MSAC (Multiple-State Appliance Standards Collaborative) COMISIÓN NACIONAL PARA EL USO EFICIENTE DE LA ENERGÍA & Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor Europe EU / ErP Directive Asia China / China Standard Certification Center Japan / METI / Top Runner Program Korea / MKE & KEMCO / e-standby program India / Bureau of Energy Efficiency Taiwan / BOE & MOEA / Energy Label AU & NZ /E3 committee / Minimum Energy Performance Standard Vietnam - MEPS 6

7 7

8 US EPA / ENERGY STAR Televisions Displays Computers Audio/Video Set-Top Boxes UPS Servers Data Center Storage 8

9 ENERGY STAR High Tech Regulated Products Home Electronics/Office Equipment Current Version In Development Battery Charging Systems (within one week of DOE final rule) Telephony (test method finalized November 2012) Audio/Video Equipment (published and effective May 1, 2013) Set-top Boxes (under review and not effective July 1, 2013) Televisions (published and effective June 1, 2013) Computers (finalized September 10, 2012) Imaging Equipment (finalized December 2012; effective September 2013) Computer Servers (finalized November 9, 2012) Displays (published and effective June 1, 2013) Small Network Equipment N/A 1.0 (effective March 2013) Data Center Storage N/A 1.0 (finalized October 2012; effective January 2013) Uninterruptible Power Supplies (published and effective August 1, 2012) Large Network Equipment N/A Q1 14 specification final, effective 9

10 ENERGY STAR TV Specifications Effective immediately, manufacturers may elect to have their Certification Body (CB) certify their eligible products to the Version 6.0 requirement. After January 15, 2013, CBs will be instructed to stop certifying new product submittals to Version 5.3. The effective date (date of manufacture) for ENERGY STAR Television Specification V 6.0 is June 1,

11 Reduction of On-Mode Power Consumption in HDTV 11

12 ENERGY STAR Display Specifications Effective immediately, manufacturers may elect to have their Certification Body (CB) certify their eligible products to the Version 6.0 requirement. After January 15, 2013, CBs will be instructed to stop certifying new product submittals to Version 5.1. The effective date (date of manufacture) for ENERGY STAR Display Specification V 6.0 is June 1,

13 US Department of Energy Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies (BCEPS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking NOPR:Doc. No.: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005 May 2, 2012 Attendants:approximately 80 stakeholders UL is the only third party certification body to attend. Final Rule: (Current estimate July 1, 2013); Comments provided before May 25, 2012; Estimated effective dates: EPS - two years after Final Ruling Battery Chargers - TBD 13

14 Battery Chargers NOPR ID Product Class Description I/O Type Battery Energy Special Characteristic or Battery Voltage Maximum UEC (kwh/yr) Applications Examined 1 Low Energy, Inductive Inductive Connection 3.04 Toothbrushes 2 Low Energy, Low Voltage < 4V = (Ebatt) < 100 Wh 3 Low Energy, Medium Voltage 4 10 V AC In, 4 Low Energy, High Voltage DC Out > 10 V For Ebatt < 9.74 Wh, = 4.68 For Ebatt 9.74 Wh, = (Ebatt) For Ebatt < 9.71 Wh, = 9.03 For Ebatt 9.71 Wh, = (Ebatt) Mobile Phones, Cordless Phones, Power Tools, Digital Cameras Power Tools Power Tools and Notebook Computers 5 Medium Energy, Low Voltage < 20 V Wh 6 Medium Energy, High Voltage 20 V For Ebatt < Wh, = For Ebatt Wh, = (Ebatt) For Ebatt < Wh, = For Ebatt Wh, = (Ebatt) Marine Chargers Lawn mowers, Wheelchairs 7 High Energy > 3000 Wh -- = 0.502(Ebatt) Golf Cars 8 Low Energy, Low Voltage DC Input -- < 9 V Input 0.66 Mp3 Players DC In, DC Out 9 Low Energy, High Voltage DC Input -- 9 V Input No Standard GPS 10a -- Without AVR AC In, AC output AC Out 10b -- With AVR For Ebatt < 37.2 Wh, = 2.54 For Ebatt 37.2 Wh, = (Ebatt) 0.18 For Ebatt < 37.2 Wh, = 6.18 For Ebatt 37.2 Wh, = (Ebatt) UPS -- Test method:appendix Y to Subpart B of Part 430 Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption of Battery Chargers 14

15 Battery Chargers NOPR 15

16 US California Energy Commission Personal Computers (Proposal) Electronic Displays (Proposal) Battery Charger Systems (Revision) 16

17 CEC Battery Charger System (BCS) Regulations CA Energy Commission gov/appliances/ On January 12, 2012, the CEC approved a new Energy Efficiency standard for Battery Chargers used to power cell phones, laptop computers, power tools, and other battery powered devices. To the date there are an estimated 170 million chargers in California (11 battery chargers per household) and energy consumed to charge batteries is increasing. Have been estimated that once new standard will be fully implemented, California will save $300 million/year and eliminate 1 million metric tons of carbon emissions. 17

18 Battery Charger Systems (BCS) Defined as a battery charger coupled with its battery (or batteries) battery chargers coupled with their batteries, which together are referred to as battery charger systems. This term covers all rechargeable batteries or devices incorporating a rechargeable battery and the chargers used with them. Battery Charger System Utility Battery Charger Power Supply Charge Control Circuitry End Use Battery 18

19 Battery Charger Systems: Effective Dates Large Battery Charger Systems More than Input Power (2 kw) Effective Small Battery Charger Systems Consumer USB charger 20Wh Non USB charger Effective Less than Effective Exception: 1. Motor vehicle* 2. Medical device* 3. Exit sign 4. Three phase input* 5. Analyzers 6. VI, VFI UPS Non-consumer Commercial Effective B2B Effective

20 CEC BCS Regulations Requirements: 1. Testing; 2. Compliance with minimum efficiency standards; 3. Certification; and 4. Labeling and/or marking 20

21 Testing for Small BCSs 10 CFR Section (aa) (Appendix Y to Subpart B of Part 430) (2011). UUT preparing Battery Selection Battery Conditioning 1. Charge mode & Battery maintenance mode test Determining the charge/maintenance duration 2. Battery discharge energy test 3. Standby (No battery) mode energy consumption test 4. Off mode energy consumption test 21

22 Battery Selection for Small BCSs Charger Type Multi-Voltage Multi-Port Multi-Capacity No No No Tests 1 Charger Type Multi-Voltage Multi-Port Multi-Capacity No No Yes Tests 2 22

23 Battery Selection for Small BCSs Charger Type Multi-Voltage Multi-Port Multi-Capacity No Yes Yes or No Tests 2 Charger Type Multi-Voltage Multi-Port Multi-Capacity Yes No No Tests 2 23

24 Battery Selection for Small BCSs Charger Type Tests Multi-Voltage Multi-Port Multi-Capacity Yes Yes to either or both 3 24

25 Battery Conditioning for Small BCSs Steps: 1) Fully CHARGED for duration specified in sections 5.2 in test procedure; 2) Fully DISCHARGED 3) Fully CHARGED again. 4) Fully DISCHARGED again. 5) Fully CHARGED again. No data need be recorded. 25

26 Certification 26

27 Certification: Appliance Efficiency Database 27

28 Labeling and/or marking Legible and permanently affixed. a) The product nameplate that houses the battery charging terminals, or b) The retail packaging and, if included, the cover page of instructions. BC 28

29 Market Surveillance Enforcement: 1. industry self policing ; 2. notice from other; and 3. results from the Energy Commission s independent test laboratory. Penalties: Energy Commission to levy administrative civil penalties of $2,500 per violation. 29

30 Enforcement Testing One unit selected for initial testing: 1. Performance is no worse than required by standards and is no worse than as certified by manufacturer; matter is closed. 2. Performance is worse than required by standard or is worse than as certified by manufacturer; second unit is procured and tested and the mean of the two results are calculated. a) Performance of the mean results is no worse than required by standards and is no worse than as certified by manufacturer; matter is closed. b) Performance is the mean results as required by standard but is worse than as certified by manufacturer; the Executive Director shall modify the listing of the appliance in the database. c) Performance of the mean results is not as required by standard; the Executive Director shall remove the appliance from the database. Costs are borne by the Commission. 30

31 DoE & CEC Comparisons Scope & Definition Test methods Criteria Mark DoE Product Class 1 ~ 10b, (Consumer Products) Appendix Y to Subpart B of Part 430 UEC (Wh/yr) Unit Energy Consumption CEC Small Battery Charger Systems 2 kw Large Battery Charger Systems Appendix Y to Subpart B of Part 430 Energy Efficiency Battery Charger System Test Procedure Version 2.2 dated November 12, 2008 Table W-2 1. Max. 24 hour charge and maintenance energy (Wh) 2. Maintenance Mode Power (W) 3.No Battery Mode Power (W) Table W-1 BC BC 31

32 Canada Natural Resources Canada Canada Gazette, Part II, Amendment 11 is published and enter into force. Regulations and test methods harmonization for external power supplies 32

33 NRCan: External Power Supplies (EPSs) No load: values obtained using the US test method are, in NRCan s view, equivalent to the results using CSA-C Active mode: for products where results obtained using the US test method are more than.8 (>), above the minimum efficiency standard they are considered equivalent to the results using CSA-C For products where results obtained using the US test method are within.8 ( ) of the minimum efficiency standard, they are not considered equivalent. Collaborative effort where outside third-party certifiers assisted NRCan with testing 10 random EPSs for their analysis of accepting the US test method.

34 Harmonization Activities

35 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Formed the Energy Efficiency Standardization Coordination Collaborative (EESCC) in September 2012 Five working groups were created: 1. Building energy and water assessment standards (including diagnostic test procedures and health and safety testing) 2. Systems energy modeling, integration, and communications 3. Building energy rating and labeling 4. Evaluation, measurement, and verification (encompassing EM&V, energy performance metrics, and standardized and portable data collection and reporting) 5. Workforce credentialing (including standards for workforce training and certification programs, and workforce skills standards) 35

36 Super-efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment (SEAD) Initiative Launched in July 2010, SEAD is a multi-government global market transformation initiative that seeks to pull super-efficient appliances and equipment into the market by cooperating on measures such as manufacturer incentives and to push the most inefficient equipment out of the market by bolstering national minimum efficiency standards. As the leading voluntary label for efficiency in the US, the ENERGY STAR program is active in individual product workgroups, including televisions and lighting two globally traded products that together account for about 15 percent of household electricity use. EPA is also engaged in recognition program being developed as well as the policy toolkit activities. 36

37 International Energy Agency (IEA) Efficient Electrical End-Use Equipment (4E) In 2009, the International Energy Agency (IEA) Efficient Electrical End-Use Equipment (4E) program began its work on international harmonization of energy efficiency programs. The 4E Implementing Agreement specifically focuses on electrical end-use equipment. Industrial, commercial, and consumer equipment is included within the program scope. The objectives of the 4E Implementing Agreement is to promote the harmonization of international efforts to promote adoption of government policies to encourage the use of efficient electrical end-use equipment. 37

38 The US and the People s Republic of China China has announced a goal of reducing energy intensity 20 percent by In support of this goal, EPA and the China Standard Certification Center (CSC) have agreed to begin voluntary work toward harmonizing energy-efficiency standards for a variety of products, including consumer electronics and office equipment. 38

39 Data Center & Cloud Computing Activities

40 The Trend As awareness around global energy consumption continues to increase, coupled with worldwide IT spending growth and cloud services adoption and enablement, there is a strong demand for manufacturers to deliver better, faster, and more efficient ways to store, process, and serve data to their customers. Servers manufacturers are rapidly developing and designing solutions for the data-hungry market. There is an opportunity for manufacturers to take advantage and address the typical nameplate rating information and overstating vendor specifications (or even worse, understating), demonstrating state-of-the-art energy performance that can relate to TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP! 40

41 Energy Productivity Illustrates EE gains from increased server utilization compared to traditional EE measures 41

42 Power Assure A leading developer of Data Center Infrastructure and Energy Management software for large enterprises, government agencies and managed service providers. Headquartered in Santa Clara, CA Power Assures products provide intelligence and analytics to CIOs, IT directors and facility managers to optimize capacity, service levels and power consumption within and across data centers. Power Assure developed a comprehensive metric for server energy efficiency called PAR4. 42

43 A comprehensive metric for server energy efficiency PAR4 Rating measures servers under maximum and no-load conditions to certify and rate equipment accurately provide a rating system to compare efficiency across multiple generations of equipment Label product with comparative efficiency for each year past, present, future How to use 4 Levels: Green (Most Efficient), Gold (Very Efficient), Silver (Fairly efficient), Black (Least Efficient) A larger PAR4 value equates to a higher energy efficiency Every 100 point increase indicates a doubling of efficiency Methodology Reports four measurements Off Mode Idle Loaded At peak 43

44

45 IEEE Power and Energy Society of Silicon Valley Latest trends in Data Center Design, Technology, and Siting Wednesday, January 23, 2013 Dinner & Networking 6:00 PM Presentation- 7:00 PM Santa Clara, CA Speaker: KC Mares President & CEO, MegaWatt Consulting RSVP: Registration required ieeepesiasdata.eventbrite.com 45

46 Q&A Thank You Tom Juliano UL - Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Global Business Development Consumer Products thomas.j.julianojr@ul.com ul.com/hitech 46

47 Appendix

48 Battery Selection for Small BCSs 48

49 Compliance Maximum 24 hour charge and maintenance energy (Wh) Input Power (Watts) Eb, Battery Discharge Energy (Wh) 4 Hour Maintenance Mode Average Power (W) Time (Hours) 49

50 Europe ErP (formerly EuP) Process 50

51 Europe ErP Directive falls under CE marking Market is based on self-declaration Typically a manufacturer would conduct required testing within their own Lab. Implementing measures currently in force: 51

52 Europe Future HT Implementing Measures 52

53 AU/NZ Minimum Energy Performance Standard, MEPS Computers (Proposal) Computer monitor (Proposal) 53

54 India Standard & Labeling Program Computers (Notebook/Laptops) Color TV 54

55 Brazil Computers Agency: The National Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality, INMETRO Updates & Developing: The decree is mandatory for products to be sold to Brazilian public companies only. Test method is same as US ENERGY STAR Program requirements Product Specification for Computers, version 5.0. Estimate Schedule: Mandatory labeling effective on