INCAS National Institute for Aerospace Research Elie Carafoli B-dul Iuliu Maniu 220, sector 6 Bucharest ROMANIA

Transcription

1 INCAS National Institute for Aerospace Research Elie Carafoli B-dul Iuliu Maniu 220, sector 6 Bucharest ROMANIA

2 INCREST(INCAS) before 1990 Romanian Aeronautical Industry Research & Development Units Manufacturing Units INCAS Bucharest COMOTI Bucharest AEROFINA Bucharest IAR Brasov STRAERO Bucharest SIMULTEC Bucharest AEROSTAR Bacau METAV Bucharest INAV Bucharest CPCA Craiova AEROTEH Bucharest ROMAERO Bucharest ELAROM Bucharest AVIOANE Craiova TURBOMECANICA Bucharest INCAS AQ System

3 INCAS major industrial military projects INCAS major industrial civil projects IAR-93 : fighter IAR-705 : FAR25 transport aircraft IAR 330 Puma IAR-95/S : supersonic fighter IAR-99 Soim : trainer IAR-701/702 : FAR25 transport aircraft (based on BAC1-11/ROMBAC) IAR-823/827/AG6 : FAR23 normal, utility aircraft ECO-100 : JAR-VLA

4 Basic Research Technology R&D Technology Development & Demonstration System Development Product Development Development strategy : Reorganization as public research company Maintaining capabilities in key sectors for product development Development of existing research infrastructure New capabilities and expertise (basic and applied research) Major capabilities : Aerodynamic design Design and stress for aerostructures Global performance analysis Wind tunnel testing Harsh environment testing Full scale demonstration System design and integration for civil and military aeronautical products

5 JTI CS Participation Consortium Approach INCAS Research STRAERO Consortium Agreement JTI GRA AEROSTAR ROMAERO Manufacturing AVIOANE Craiova Critical Mass Resources to be allocated t o CS Expression of Interest Strategy Definition Evaluation of Resources Analysis of Capabilities Costs & Benefit Analysis

6 Consortium Certifications All members in the consortium are proud to have implemented a Quality Management System certified according to highest standards. Consortium members have been certified by civil and military aviation organizations. Major representatives of civil aviation industry have confirmed and approved existing capabilities. Each member has a strong strategy to implement latest standards and procedures based on long term strategy for development.

7 Following the process of selection of Associate Partners to the JTI Clean Sky, INCAS Consortium is part of the following platforms: SFWA Smart Fixed Wing Aircraft INCAS Cluster GRA Green Regional Aircraft (INCAS as a member of CIRA+ Cluster)

8 About INCAS Founded in 1949 as research establishment in fluid mechanics Re-organized as Institute for Aviation in 1968 Authorized by Romanian military authority for aircraft and aircraft component design - NTAZ/1970 Authorized by AACR in 1986 for civil aircraft and aircraft component design A1-02/1986 Authorized by AACR in 1986 for testing civil aircraft and aircraft components B4-08/1986 Transformed as state-owned company in 1991 Re-organized as research establishment in 2008 (public body)

9 INCAS Profile : State owned company/ Public body Founded in employees (2011) Leading research establishment for aerospace research in Romania Major activities : Main design authority and system integrator in aeronautics Aerodynamic design Structural design and analysis Experimental wind tunnel validation Global performance analysis Atmospheric investigations Earth Observation Research and development in aeronautics and aerospace sciences

10 Capabilities to be used for CS Model design Conceptual design Global evaluation Integrated design and testing capabilities Model manufacturing WT testing

11 Integration with partners : Product development from design specifications to certification and testing Specific activities for industrial partners on new technologies Pilot projects New capabilities and expertise Active partners : Traditional national industrial partners International cooperation EU FP6/7 Higher visibility for existing capabilities and new developments

12 ROMAERO S.A. 1/2 Large Aerostructures manufacture (50% activity) B777 LE A380 panels G-200 aft-body

13 ROMAERO S.A. 2/2 MRO activities (50% activity)

14 AVIOANE Craiova S.A. BAe 146 doors

15 Subsonic Wind Tunnel Atmospheric pressure, continuous type facility Maximum speed : 110 m/s 2.5m x 2.0m x 4m test section Usual Reynolds number up to 1.5 million. Equipment: Traditional closed circuit type Solid walls test section External 6 component pyramidal type balance Standard pressure acquisition systems New data acquisition technologies Hot film/wire measurements IR camera PIV system 3D dynamic deformation fast cameras Laser visualization systems CTS system open/closed loop operation Aeroacoustics and airframe noise evaluation 72 microphone matrix system Beamforming technology Cross-corelation with dynamic pressure/kulites

16 Supersonic Wind Tunnel blowdown type 1.2m x 1.2m test sections (3D) Mach number range : Reynolds number up to 100 millions/m Max test run duration : 90 sec. Max pressure : 16 bar (settling chamber) Interchangeable porous transonic test section Variable porosity from 0.01% up to 9% Interchangeable complex 3D/2D 0.8m x 1.2m test section Active model/combustion capability Equipment: Sting mounted, internal balance Pressure measurements Mach control system CTS system 800 mm schlieren system PIV under development IR camera ultra fast digital camera

17 Solid walls test section Perforated test section

18 CL [basic units] SFWA WP114 Flow Control TS AVERT F15 MRey. = deg. 40 deg. cj = deg. 45 deg. Beta=20 deg. 45 deg. Beta=20 deg. cj = deg Alpha (deg.) AVERT (FP6) >> SFWA

19 SFWA WP112 Buffeting TS

20 SFWA WP 135 Harsh Environment Testing Ad hoc testing Compatibility testing Endurance testing Recovery testing Stress testing Harsh environment testing

21 INCAS participation in JTI SFWA WP 2.x Ground demonstration static test rig Ground demonstration active test rig Krueger flap installation study

22 INCAS participation in JTI Clean Sky SFWA demonstrators Smart Wing Technologies Technology Development Technology Integration Large Scale Flight Demonstration Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) Hybrid Laminar Flow (HLF) Active and passive load control Novel enabling materials Innovative manufacturing scheme Biz-jet after-body demo Full scale aft body structure Complex test rig Acoustic measurements Fatigue and thermal test of structural panels in real environment

23 INCAS participation in JTI Clean Sky SFWA BLADE demo BLADE demonstrator POD BLADE demonstrator outer wing integration

24 SFWA BizJet demo BizJet Test RIG BizJet AfterBody

25 INCAS participation in JTI Clean Sky GRA

26 JTI Clean Sky Airbus & INCAS team

27 Chk Auth. Apr. Project Management Structure INCAS Management AQ Manager Head of Eng. AQ Procedures Planning Department Project Leader Aerodynamics Leader Design Leader Stress Leader Technology Leader A1 A2 An D1 D2 Dn D1 D2 Dn T1 T2 Tn

28 RE vs. DOA HR Structure Selection Process Scientific Council General Manager R&D Manager Inst. Policy Manager Technical Manager R&D personnel AQ Manager Head of Eng. AQ personnel Activity personnel

29 INCAS as DOA Extended Airbus DOA

30 JTI Clean Sky major achievements for INCAS Cluster Higher visibility for INCAS Cluster capabilities for aeronautical industry Larger dissemination for R&D results in academic community New opportunities for collaborative research Potential integration for industrial capabilities with major industrial partners in Europe High impact on HR development INCAS was involved in all major CS activities (including top management)

31 JTI Clean Sky lessons learned Cluster management may be a real problem due to: - Legal/administrative changes related to JU - Financial regulations (real nightmare!) - Technical content not defined in full details A cluster needs to have a very flexible internal agreement in order to survive! - Redistribution of technical activities (and funding) between partners - Representation activities at JU level - Internal administrative changes (to be constantly updated to JU) A cluster needs to act as a single entity! - Unique voice in the JU - A shared pool of resources would be of great help - Clear separation for major interests - Participation as a cluster is a huge advantage if: - R&D companies are involved in low TRL activities and manufacturing companies are included - A DOA is in the cluster

32 Thank you for your attention!