Pennsylvania Potato Research Report, 2013
|
|
- Edmund Greer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pennsylvania Potato Research Report, 2013 Edited by: Xinshun Qu & Barbara J. Christ Department of Plant Pathology & Environmental Microbiology The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA January 20, 2014
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE Executive Summary... i Progress Report - Pennsylvania Regional Potato Germplasm Evaluation Program... 1 Yield and Harvest Data Tables... 3 Management of Evaluation Trials Field evaluation of potato cultivars and breeding lines for resistance to late blight Field evaluation of potato cultivars and breeding lines for resistance to early blight Field evaluation of potato cultivars and breeding lines for resistance to powdery scab Evaluation of foliar fungicides for control of potato late blight... 35
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Penn State s Department of Plant Pathology & Environmental Microbiology potato research program can be categorized into five areas: 1) variety breeding and evaluation, 2) breeding for disease resistance (focused on early and late blight, and common and powdery scab), 3) biology and genetic variability of potato pathogens (focused on early and late blight and powdery scab), 4) chemical control and 5) integrated pest management of potatoes. Many of these projects are long term and only yearly results are presented here. 1. Variety Breeding and Evaluation At the Rock Springs location the trials included 101 round whites with a few yellow flesh, 23 red-skinned (a few purple skinned) and 50 russet or long white types. The Lehigh location had 35 lines and Erie location had 39 lines. Breeding lines were contributed by the USDA-ARS, New York, Maine, Michigan, Idaho and a few other sources. See Pennsylvania Regional Potato Germplasm Evaluation Program, 2013 on pages 1-2, and tables from different locations on pages Breeding for Disease Resistance There are several projects focused around a cultivated diploid species hybrid population that can be easily intercrossed with common varieties. These are long term projects dealing with early and late blight resistance as well as powdery scab resistance. Results of these projects will not be presented here but results of small trials evaluating soon to be released lines for their reaction to early blight, late blight and powdery scab are presented. In three separate field trials, 58, 32 and 33 varieties and advanced breeding lines were evaluated for disease resistance to late blight, early blight, and powdery scab, respectively. Kennebec was considered the moderately resistant check and B was the resistant check to late blight. NY150 (NYF52-1), Rochdale Gold-Doree, NY148 (NYE106-4), AF , BNC182-5, Dakota Trailblazer, A , Russet Burbank, A LB, MSS487-2, AF4696-1, B0692-4, AF4573-2, AF4615-5, AF4692-1, and MSS934-4 were considered resistant to moderately resistant. See Field evaluation of potato cultivars and breeding lines for resistance to late blight in Pennsylvania, 2013 page 32. Seven cultivars/lines were classified as resistant to moderately resistant to early blight, and they are: Dakota Trailblazer, AF , A , Russet Burbank, NY148 (NYE106-4), BNC182-5, and Katahdin. See Field evaluation of potato cultivars and breeding lines for resistance to early blight in Pennsylvania, 2013 page 33. The powdery scab disease pressure was low thus making it difficult to separate cultivars/lines into groups (resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, and i
4 susceptible). Based on our past years data, Shepody should be susceptible, and Russet Burbank should be moderately resistant. Cultivars and breeding lines with less powdery scab than Dark Red Norland indicate some level of resistance. See Field evaluation of potato cultivars and breeding lines for resistance to powdery scab in Pennsylvania, 2013 page Chemical Control of Potato Diseases In the late blight fungicide trial 8 different treatments were compared to an untreated control. All of the treatments significantly suppressed season-long foliar late blight compared to the untreated control. All of the treatments, except for CX alternated with Bravo WS and Bravo WS applied at 14 day intervals, had significantly higher yields than the untreated control. See Evaluation of foliar fungicides for control of potato late blight in Pennsylvania, 2013 page 35. ii
5 Progress Report---December 18, 2013 Pennsylvania Regional Potato Germplasm Evaluation Program, 2013 Xinshun Qu, Barbara J. Christ and Michael Peck Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology The Pennsylvania State University The objective of this project is to find new breeding lines that have adaptation to Pennsylvania potato growing regions, and have qualities that are suitable for either processing or tablestock use. We cooperate with the project leaders of several other potato breeding programs from the Northeast US and a few programs from the Midwest US and Canada by evaluating their potato germplasm. Data from this project helps breeders determine which lines to focus on for potential release as new varieties and also allows you to focus on very specific lines that may be released in the near future. Replicated and non-replicated plots were established at the following locations: Lehigh Co. (Tables 1-2), Erie Co. (Tables 3-4) and Rock Springs, Centre Co. (Tables 5-12). The Lehigh location had 35 non-replicated lines. The Erie location had 39 lines non-replicate lines. At the Rock Springs location the trials included 60 round whites with a few yellow flesh, 16 redskinned (a few purple skinned) and 43 russet or long white types in replicated plots, and an additional 41 whites, 7 red-skinned and 7 russet or long white types planted in non-replicated observational plots. At Lehigh Co. and Erie Co. locations, the seed spacing was 8-inch within a 20-ft plot except for the russets that were at 10-inch. At Rock Springs location, the seed spacing was 8-inch within a 10-ft plot except for the russets that were at 10-inch. At the Rock Springs location, a green mustard manure crop Caliente 199 was grown after the wheat harvest. The mustard crop was flail chopped and plowed down to incorporate into the field the previous year. Commercial trials of four varieties (AF3001-6, Challenger, Nicolet, and AF ) were conducted at three locations: Erie Co., Schuylkill Co. and Rock Springs, Centre Co (Table 13-14). All other pertinent information for individual trials is found within the data tables or in Table 15. We assessed yield, tuber size, internal defects and external defects, skin color, texture, tuber shape, specific gravity and overall appearance. Chip quality tests and culinary tests will be conducted over the next few months. Management information for each site is provided in Table 15. To interpret this data, one needs to know the yields for the check cultivars such as Atlantic, Snowden, Katahdin, Chieftain, Dark Red Norland, Russet Norkotah or Superior on your farm. Then compare the typical yield for this year on your farm to the data presented here. The yields tend to be inflated from these small plots but the ranking of the yields over the cultivars/lines usually is fairly consistent. Also the same method can be used to compare specific gravity and some of the other parameters. There are a few lines that will be very specific to certain environments so make the comparison to the location that best matches your own or use the Rock Springs location as a fairly typical area for most of PA. 1
6 Results: In the Lehigh location the following lines also had marketable yield higher than Atlantic: AF , MSS576-05SPL, and Soraya. In Erie Co. the following also had marketable yield higher than Atlantic: Snowden, Reba, Katahdin, Superior, Chieftain, Dark Red Chieftain, Carolina, HZC , W , Taurus, AF , B2728-2, A Y, Francisca, Sifra, Parella, Envol, Nadine, Lanorma, AF3001-6, Jelly, and A Based on data of replicated trials at Rock Springs, there were 9 round white clones with marketable yields significantly greater than Atlantic: BNC182-5, NY148 (E106-4), AF4442-4, AF4614-2, CO W/Y, W , A RY, Vivaldi, and Sifra. There were another 20 round white clones with marketable yields greater than Atlantic: Snowden, AF4013-3, AF4138-8, B , AF4376-3, AF4227-2, AF4430-1, B2728-2, B2738-3, B2833-8, MSQ086-3, MSS576-05SPL, Spartan Splash, MI Purple Sport I, CO W, ATC W/Y, W5955-1, Parella, HZC , and Francisca. Round White Chip-stock: Based on data from replicated trials at Rock Springs, the following lines had higher yields than Atlantic and have specific gravities suitable for chipstock: Snowden, AF4013-3, B , BNC182-5, NY148 (E106-4), AF4227-2, AF4442-4, AF4614-2, AF4640-1, B2728-2, B2833-8, MSS576-05SPL, CO W, CO W/Y, W5955-1, and W Red-skinned: Based on data of replicated trials at Rock Springs, there were 6 red-skinned or purple-skinned clones with marketable yields significantly greater than Chieftain: B2676-2, BNC244-10, BNC201-1, A PY, A Y, and Carolina. There were another 3 red-skinned or purple-skinned clones with marketable yields greater than Chieftain: AF4550-2, AF4566-4, and HZC Russet-skinned or long white: Based on data of replicated trials at Rock Springs, there were 9 russet-skinned clones with marketable yields significantly greater than Russet Burbank: Dakota Trailblazer, AF3001-6, AF3362-1, AF4702-2, AC RU, A VR, Challenger, Jelly, and Fontane. There were another 20 russet-skinned clones with marketable yields greater than Russet Burbank: AF4040-2, AF4124-4, AF4124-7, AF , AF4347-1, AF4283-1, AF4296-3, AF4532-8, AF4453-7, AF4692-1, AF4950-2, CO RU, AC RU, A , A , A NV, A CR, A , A , and A T. The Pennsylvania Potato Research Program and a USDA grant funded this research in conjunction with donations. This research is the result of cooperation of growers, industry and PSU staff. The growers hosting the plots provided contributions (land, fertilizer, pesticides, time, etc.). Cornell University, USDA, University of Maine, Idaho, Colorado State University, University of Wisconsin, Michigan State University breeding programs and Real Potatoes, HZPC provided seed. Special thanks to Chad Moore, Bob Leiby, Andy Muza and Sara May who made sure this project was completed. 2
7 Table 1. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" yield, percent of standard, size distribution, percent pick outs and specific gravity for potato evaluation trial in Lehigh County, Tim Geiger Farm, 2013 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class 3 Specific Total >1 7/8" US#1 Standard 2 %PO Gravity Atlantic Snowden Reba Katahdin Superior Yukon Gold Chieftain BNC Carolina Dark Red Chieftain AF BNC Nicolet AF W Taurus AF AF MSS576-05SPL CO W/Y Francisca Sifra Vilaldi Russet Norkotah Dakota Trialblazer AF Challenger Fontane
8 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % % by size class 3 Total >1 7/8" US#1 of Standard Jelly Alegria Teton Russet Soraya Envol Lanorma Nadine Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of the standard, Atlantic, for >1 7/8" yield. 3 Percentage of total yield according to size class. 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. %PO 4 Specific Gravity 4 Percentage of total that are pickouts. Non-replicated trial. Russets and long whites were planted 10-in. apart with 24 seed pieces per 20-ft plot, all other varieties were spaced 8-in. apart with 30 seed pieces per 20-ft plot. 4
9 Table 2. Tuber characteristics, internal and external defects for potato evaluation trial in Lehigh County, Tim Geiger Farm, 2013 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons for Pickouts Atlantic Snowden Reba Katahdin Green Superior Misshape Yukon Gold Chieftain BNC Green Carolina Misshape, knobs Dark Red Chieftain AF BNC Misshape Nicolet Green AF W Misshape Taurus Growth Cracks AF AF Misshape MSS576-05SPL Growth Cracks CO W/Y Misshape Francisca Misshape Sifra Misshape, growth cracks Vilaldi Russet Norkotah Dakota Trialblazer Growth cracks AF Knobs Challenger Green Fontane
10 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons for Pickouts Jelly Growth cracks, green Alegria Knobs Teton Russet Growth cracks Soraya Knobs, green Envol Lanorma Growth cracks Nadine Green 1 Tuber Characteristics: TA = tuber appearance: 1 = very poor, 5= fair, 9 = excellent. C = skin color: 1 = purple, 2 = red, 3 = pink, 4 = dark brown, 5 = brown, 6 = tan, 7 = buff, 8 = white, 9 = cream. TX = skin texture: 1 = partial russet, 2 = heavy russet, 3 = mod. russet, 4 = light russet, 5 = netted, 6 = slight net, 7 = mod. smooth, 8 = smooth, 9 = very Sh = tuber shape: 1 = round, 2 = mostly round, 3 = round-oblong, 4 = mostly oblong, 5 = oblong, 6 = oblong-long, 7 = mostly long, 8 = long, 9 = cylindrical. TED = tuber eye depth: 1 = very deep, 5 = medium, 9 = very shallow. TCS = tuber cross section: 1 = very flat, 5 = intermediate, 9 = very round. 2 Internal Defects: HH = hollow heart, IB = internal browning. Total number observed out of 8 tubers. 0 = not observed. 6
11 Table 3. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" yield, percent of standard, size distribution, percent pickouts and specific gravity for potato evaluation trial in Erie County, Mark Troyer Farm, Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class Specific %PO 4 Total >1 7/8" US#1 Standard Gravity Atlantic Snowden Reba Katahdin Superior Yukon Gold Chieftain Dark Red Chieftain Carolina Smiley CO0405-1RF HZC Nicolet AF W W Taurus Opera AF AF B A Y Francisca Sifra Parella Vilaldi Envol Nadine Lanorma Russet Norkotah Dakota Trialblazer
12 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % % by size class 3 Total >1 7/8" US#1 of Standard 2 %PO AF AF Challenger Fontane Jelly Alegria Teton Russet A Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of the standard, Atlantic, for >1 7/8" yield. 3 Percentage of total yield according to size class. 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. Specific Gravity 4 Percentage of total that are pickouts. Non-replicated trial. Russets and long whites planted 10-in. apart with 24 seed pieces per 20-ft plot, all other varieties were spaced 8-in. apart with 30 seed pieces per 20-ft plot. 8
13 Table 4. Tuber characteristics, internal and external defects for potato evaluation trial in Erie County, Mark Troyer Farm, 2013 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons for Pickouts Atlantic Green Snowden Green Reba Green Katahdin Green Superior Green Yukon Gold Green Chieftain Growth cracks, green Dark Red Chieftain Growth cracks, green Carolina Misshape, green Smiley 4 * Green CO0405-1RF Misshape, green HZC Green, misshape Nicolet Green AF Green, growth cracks W Green W Green, Scab Taurus Green, growth cracks Opera Green, scab AF Green, scab AF Green, misshape B Green A Y Green, growth cracks Francisca Green Sifra Green, growth cracks Parella Green, growth cracks Vilaldi Green, misshape Envol Green Nadine Green, knobs Lanorma Green, scab Russet Norkotah Green, misshape Dakota Trialblazer Green, knobs 9
14 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 Reasons for Pickouts TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB AF Green, knobs AF Green, knobs Challenger Green, growth cracks Fontane Green Jelly Green, knobs Alegria Knobs, green Teton Russet Growth cracks, green A Knobs, green 1 Tuber Characteristics: TA = tuber appearance: 1 = very poor, 5= fair, 9 = excellent. C = skin color: 1 = purple, 2 = red, 3 = pink, 4 = dark brown, 5 = brown, 6 = tan, 7 = buff, 8 = white, 9 = cream. * = pink with white around eyes. TX = skin texture: 1 = partial russet, 2 = heavy russet, 3 = mod. russet, 4 = light russet, 5 = netted, 6 = slight net, 7 = mod. smooth, 8 = smooth, 9 = very smooth. Sh = tuber shape: 1 = round, 2 = mostly round, 3 = round-oblong, 4 = mostly oblong, 5 = oblong, 6 = oblong-long, 7 = mostly long, 8 = long, 9 = cylindrical. TED = tuber eye depth: 1 = very deep, 5 = medium, 9 = very shallow. TCS = tuber cross section: 1 = very flat, 5 = intermediate, 9 = very round. 2 Internal Defects: HH = hollow heart, IB = internal browning. Total number observed out of 8 tubers. 0 = not observed. 10
15 Table 5. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" yield, percent of standard, size distribution, percent pickouts, and specific gravity for round white potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of Total >1 7/8" US# Standard 2 % by size class 3 %PO 4 Specific Gravity Atlantic ML Katahdin ML Kennebec ML Rochdale Gold-Doree ML Snowden ML Superior ME Yukon Gold M AF L AF ML AF M AF M AF M B ML BNC L NY148 (E106-4) L NY150 (F52-1) E AF ML AF ML AF ML AF ML AF ML AF ML AF VL AF ML B ML B ML B ME B E MSL M MSL292-A ME Vine Maturity 11
16 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of Standard 2 %PO 4 Gravity % by size class 3 Specific Total >1 7/8" US# MSL007-B L MSR ML MSQ ML MSS576-05SPL ML Spartan Splash ME MI Purple Sport I M CO W ML CO W M CO W ML CO W/Y ML AC W ML ATC W/Y L Nicolet ML W ML W M W L Accumulator ML A RY L Opera ML Parella M Vivaldi M Taurus ME Sifra L HZC M Soraya ML Francisca M Nadine M Lanorma L Reba ME Envol E AF4463-7* M AF * ML Vine Maturity 12
17 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class Standard 2 Total >1 7/8" US# AF4838-1* ML AF4914-4* ML AF * ME AF5040-4* ML AF5042-8* ML AF5068-3* M AF5138-2* M AF5140-1* ME AF5142-1* ML AF5144-7* M AF5243-2* ME AF5150-1* ME B * M B2876-7* M B * E BNC266-6* ML B2930-5* ME BNC326-14* E Challenger* L B2993-1* ME B2993-2* M B2994-1* ML B2996-2* M B2999-1* ML B2999-6* M B3000-1* ML B3000-2* L B3002-1* L B3002-3* L B3005-6* ML B3005-7* E 3 Specific %PO 4 Gravity Vine Maturity 13
18 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class Standard 2 Total >1 7/8" US# B3005-9* ME B3010-2* E B3012-3* E B3021-1* ML B3042-1* E BNC363-6* L BNC364-1* ME BNC369-4* ML LSD Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of the standard, Atlantic, for >1 7/8" yield. 3 Percentage of total yield according to size class. 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. 4 Percentage of total that are pickouts. Planted 8-in. apart with 15 seed pieces per 10-ft plot. Replicated trials are the average of 3 replicates except for those lines with * which were non-replicated. LSD indicates least significant difference (P = 0.05), calculated for replicated varieties. 3 %PO 4 Specific Gravity Vine Maturity 14
19 Table 6. Tuber characteristics, internal and external defects for round white potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 3 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons for Pickouts 3 Atlantic Green, growth cracks Katahdin Green Kennebec Growth cracks, green, knobs Rochdale Gold-Doree Green Snowden Green Superior Green Yukon Gold Green, growth cracks AF Green, growth cracks AF Green AF Green AF Growth cracks, green AF Misshape, green, knobs B Green, growth cracks BNC Green, misshape NY148 (E106-4) Green NY150 (F52-1) Green AF Green AF Green, growth cracks AF Green AF Green AF Green AF Green AF Green AF Green B Green B Green, misshape B Green B Green MSL Green MSL292-A Green 15
20 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons for Pickouts MSL007-B Green MSR Green, scab MSQ Green MSS576-05SPL 5 * Green, misshape Spartan Splash 4 ** Green MI Purple Sport I 4 *** Green CO W Green CO W Green, growth cracks CO W Growth cracks, green CO W/Y Green, misshape AC W Green, growth cracks ATC W/Y Green, growth cracks Nicolet Green W Green, knobs W Growth cracks, green W Green, growth cracks Accumulator Knobs, green A RY Green Opera Green, growth cracks, misshape Parella Green, growth cracks, misshape Vivaldi Green, knobs Taurus Green, growth cracks, knobs Sifra Green, growth cracks HZC Green, growth cracks, misshape Soraya Knobs, misshape Francisca Green, growth cracks, misshape Nadine Green, growth cracks, knobs Lanorma Green, knobs Reba Green Envol Pink eye, green AF4463-7* Growth cracks AF * Growth cracks 16
21 for Pickouts Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons AF4838-1* Growth cracks, green AF4914-4* Green AF * Green AF5040-4* Growth cracks, green AF5042-8* Growth cracks AF5068-3* Growth cracks AF5138-2* Green, growth cracks AF5140-1* Green AF5142-1* Green AF5144-7* Green AF5243-2* Growth cracks AF5150-1* Green, misshape B * Growth cracks B2876-7* Growth cracks, green B * Green BNC266-6* Green B2930-5* Green BNC326-14* Growth cracks Challenger* Growth cracks B2993-1* Green B2993-2* Green, growth cracks B2994-1* Green B2996-2* Green, growth cracks B2999-1* Green B2999-6* Green B3000-1* Green B3000-2* Green B3002-1* Growth cracks, knobs B3002-3* Green, growth cracks B3005-6* Green, growth cracks B3005-7* Green 17
22 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 Reasons for Pickouts TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB B3005-9* Green B3010-2* Misshape, green B3012-3* Green B3021-1* Green B3042-1* Growth cracks, knobs BNC363-6* Green BNC364-1* Green BNC369-4* Green 1 Tuber Characteristics: TA = tuber appearance: 1 = very poor, 5= fair, 9 = excellent. C = skin color: 1 = purple, 2 = red, 3 = pink, 4 = dark brown, 5 = brown, 6 = tan, 7 = buff, 8 = white, 9 = cream. * = tan with red splotches, ** = tan with purple splotches, *** = have pruple streaks TX = skin texture: 1 = partial russet, 2 = heavy russet, 3 = mod. russet, 4 = light russet, 5 = netted, 6 = slight net, 7 = mod. smooth, 8 = smooth, 9 = very smooth. Sh = tuber shape: 1 = round, 2 = mostly round, 3 = round-oblong, 4 = mostly oblong, 5 = oblong, 6 = oblong-long, 7 = mostly long, 8 = long, 9 = cylindrical. TED = tuber eye depth: 1 = very deep, 5 = medium, 9 = very shallow. TCS = tuber cross section: 1 = very flat, 5 = intermediate, 9 = very round. 2 Internal Defects: HH = hollow heart, IB = internal browning. Total number observed out of 12 tubers for replicated trials and total number out of 4 for non replicated trials (marked with *). 0 = not observed. 3 Most of the green was cause by the dry soil conditions after vine kill. The soil had large cracks in it that let the tubers get green from the sun. Most of the growth cracks and misshapes came from the dry conditions and uneven rain fall this year. 18
23 Table 7. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" yield, percent of standard, size distribution, percent pickouts, and specific gravity for red or purple skinned potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of Total >1 7/8" US# Chieftain ML Dark Red Norland E B E BNC ME AF E AF E AF E BNC ML MSR226-ARR M CO RF E A PY M A Y L HZC ML Smiley ML Carolina M DarK Red Chieftain ML AF4593-1* E AF5160-7* ML AF5245-1* M B2863-7* ME BNC306-3* M BNC320-2* E BNC322-2* ML LSD Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of the standard, Chieftain, for >1 7/8" yield. 3 Percentage of total yield according to size class. 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. 4 Percentage of total that are pickouts. Replicated trials are the average of 3 replicates except for those lines with * which were non-replicated. LSD indicates least significant difference (P = 0.05), calculated for replicated varieties. Plots consisted of 10-ft rows with 15 seed pieces spaced 8-in. apart. Standard 2 Gravity % by size class 3 %PO 4 Specific Vine Maturity 19
24 Table 8. Tuber characteristics, internal and external defects for red skinned potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 Reasons for Pickouts 3 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Chieftain Growth cracks,green Dark Red Norland Growth cracks, knobs B Green BNC Misshape AF Growth cracks AF Growth cracks, misshape, green AF Growth cracks, knobs, misshape BNC Green, misshape MSR226-ARR Green, growth cracks CO RF Misshape A PY Growth cracks, misshape A Y Green HZC Misshape, green Smiley Green, growth cracks Carolina Misshape, green DarK Red Chieftain Misshape, growth cracks AF4593-1* Growth cracks AF5160-7* Knobs AF5245-1* B2863-7* Misshape BNC306-3* Growth cracks BNC320-2* BNC322-2* Growth cracks 1 Tuber Characteristics: TA = tuber appearance: 1 = very poor, 5= fair, 9 = excellent. C = skin color: 1 = purple, 2 = red, 3 = pink, 4 = dark brown, 5 = brown, 6 = tan, 7 = buff, 8 = white, 9 = cream. TX = skin texture: 1 = partial russet, 2 = heavy russet, 3 = mod. russet, 4 = light russet, 5 = netted, 6 = slight net, 7 = mod. smooth, 8 = smooth, 9 = very smooth. Sh = tuber shape: 1 = round, 2 = mostly round, 3 = round-oblong, 4 = mostly oblong, 5 = oblong, 6 = oblong-long, 7 = mostly long, 8 = long, 9 = cylindrical. TED = tuber eye depth: 1 = very deep, 5 = medium, 9 = very shallow. TCS = tuber cross section: 1 = very flat, 5 = intermediate, 9 = very round. 2 Internal Defects: HH = hollow heart, IB = internal browning. Total number observed out of 12 tubers for replicated trials and total number out of 4 for non replicated trials (marked with *). 0 = not observed. 3 Most of the green was cause by the dry soil conditions after vine kill. The soil had large cracks in it that let the tubers get green from the sun. Most of the growth cracks and misshapes came from the dry conditions and uneven rain fall this year. 20
25 Table 9. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" yield, percent of standard, size distribution, percent pickouts, and specific gravity for russet skinned or long white potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class 3 Specific Standard 2 %PO 4 Gravity Total >1 7/8" US# Dakota Trailblazer ML Russet Burbank M Teton Russet E A ML AF ML AF L AF M AF E AF ME AF ML AF ME AF ML AF M AF ML AF ML AF M AF ME AF E AF L AF L AF ML AF ME AF ML AF ML AF ME AC RU ML CO RU ML Vine Maturity 21
26 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class Standard 2 Total >1 7/8" US# AC RU ML A ML A ME A TE E A NV M A M A CR ME A VR ME A LB ML A TE M A ME A ME A T ML Challenger L Jelly ML Fontane ML AF4957-5* E AF5050-5* M AF5072-1* M AF * ML AF5205-1* L AF5312-1* E Alegria* ME LSD Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of the standard, Russet Burbank for >1 7/8" yield. 3 Percentage of total yield according to size class: 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. 4 Percentage of total that are pickouts. Replicated trials are the average of 3 replicates except for those lines with * which were non-replicated. LSD indicates least significant difference (P = 0.05), calculated for replicated varieties. Plots consisted of 10-ft rows with 12 seed pieces spaced 10-in. apart. 3 %PO 4 Specific Gravity Vine Maturity 22
27 Table 10. Tuber characteristics, internal and external defects for russet skinned or long white potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 3 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Reasons for Pickouts 3 Dakota Trailblazer Growth cracks, misshape Russet Burbank Knobs, growth cracks, misshape Teton Russet Growth cracks A Knobs, misshape AF Growth cracks, knobs, green AF Green, misshape AF Misshape, green, growth cracks AF Misshape, green, knobs, growth cracks AF Misshape, knobs, growth cracks AF Misshape, green AF Misshape AF Misshape, growth cracks AF Misshape, green, knobs AF Knobs, green, misshape AF Knobs, green AF Growth cracks, misshape, green AF Growth cracks, green, misshape, knobs AF Misshape, green AF Misshape, green AF Misshape, knobs, green AF Green, growth cracks, knobs AF Green, misshape, knobs AF Misshape, green AF Knobs, green AF Growth cracks, green AC RU Misshape, green CO RU Misshape, green, growth cracks 23
28 Reasons for Pickouts TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 AC RU Growth cracks, misshape A Knobs A Growth cracks, misshape A TE Growth cracks, misshape A NV Misshape, green A Misshape, knobs, green A CR Knobs, green A VR Green, knobs, misshape A LB Misshape A TE Growth cracks, green A Misshape, green A Misshape, green A T Growth cracks, misshape Challenger Green, Misshape, growth cracks Jelly Green, misshape Fontane Knobs, misshape, green AF4957-5* Growth cracks AF5050-5* Green, growth cracks AF5072-1* Growth cracks, knobs AF * Green AF5205-1* Misshape AF5312-1* Knobs, misshape Alegria* Knobs, green 1 Tuber Characteristics: TA = tuber appearance: 1 = very poor, 5= fair, 9 = excellent. C = skin color: 1 = purple, 2 = red, 3 = pink, 4 = dark brown, 5 = brown, 6 = tan, 7 = buff, 8 = white, 9 = cream. TX = skin texture: 1 = partial russet, 2 = heavy russet, 3 = mod. russet, 4 = light russet, 5 = netted, 6 = slight net, 7 = mod. smooth, 8 = smooth, 9 = very smooth. Sh = tuber shape: 1 = round, 2 = mostly round, 3 = round-oblong, 4 = mostly oblong, 5 = oblong, 6 = oblong-long, 7 = mostly long, 8 = long, 9 = cylindrical. TED = tuber eye depth: 1 = very deep, 5 = medium, 9 = very shallow. TCS = tuber cross section: 1 = very flat, 5 = intermediate, 9 = very round. 2 Internal Defects: HH = hollow heart, IB = internal browning. Total number observed out of 12 tubers for replicated trials and total number out of 4 for non replicated trials (marked with *). 0 = not observed. 3 Most of the green was cause by the dry soil conditions after vine kill. The soil had large cracks in it that let the tubers get green from the sun. Most of the growth cracks and misshapes came from the dry conditions and uneven rain fall this year. 24
29 Table 11. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" percent of standard, size distribution, percent pickouts, and specific gravity for NE1231 potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class 3 %PO 4 Specific Gravity Total >1 7/8" US#1 Standard Atlantic ML Chieftain ML Dakota Trailblazer ML Dark Red Norland E Katahdin ML Kennebec ML Rochdale Gold-Doree ML Russet Burbank M Snowden ML Superior ME Teton Russet E Yukon Gold M A ML AF L AF ML AF L AF M AF ML AF E AF ME AF ML AF M AF M AF M AF ME AF ML Vine Maturity 25
30 Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % of % by size class 3 Total >1 7/8" US#1 Standard B E B ML BNC L BNC ME NY148 (E106-4) L NY150 (F52-1) E LSD Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of the standard, Atlantic, for >1 7/8" yield. 3 Percentage of total yield according to size class. 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. 4 Percentage of total that are pickouts. Replicated trials are the average of 4 replicates. LSD indicates least significant difference ( P= 0.05 ). %PO 4 Specific Gravity Russets were planted 10-in. apart with 12 seed pieces per 10-ft plot, all other varieties were spaced 8-in. apart with 15 seed pieces per 10-ft plot. Vine Maturity 26
31 Table 12. Tuber characteristics, internal and external defects for NE1231 potato evaluation trial in Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm, 2013 Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 Reasons for Pickouts 3 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB Atlantic Green, growth cracks Chieftain Growth cracks, green Dakota Trailblazer Growth cracks, misshape Dark Red Norland Growth cracks, knobs Katahdin Green Kennebec Growth cracks, green, knobs Rochdale Gold-Doree Green Russet Burbank Knobs, growth cracks, misshape Snowden Green Superior Green Teton Russet Growth cracks Yukon Gold Green, growth cracks A Knobs, misshape AF Green, growth cracks AF Growth cracks, knobs, green AF Green, misshape AF Misshape, green, growth cracks AF Green AF Misshape, green, knobs, growth cracks AF Misshape, knobs, growth cracks AF Misshape, green AF Green AF Growth cracks, green AF Misshape, green, knobs AF Misshape AF Misshape, growth cracks 27
32 Reasons for Pickouts Tuber Characteristics 1 Internal Defects 2 TA C TX Sh TED TCS HH IB B Green B Green, growth cracks BNC Green, misshape BNC Misshape NY148 (E106-4) Green NY150 (F52-1) Green 1 Tuber Characteristics: TA = tuber appearance: 1 = very poor, 5= fair, 9 = excellent. C = skin color: 1 = purple, 2 = red, 3 = pink, 4 = dark brown, 5 = brown, 6 = tan, 7 = buff, 8 = white, 9 = cream. TX = skin texture: 1 = partial russet, 2 = heavy russet, 3 = mod. russet, 4 = light russet, 5 = netted, 6 = slight net, 7 = mod. smooth, 8 = smooth, 9 = very smooth. Sh = tuber shape: 1 = round, 2 = mostly round, 3 = round-oblong, 4 = mostly oblong, 5 = oblong, 6 = oblong-long, 7 = mostly long, 8 = long, 9 = cylindrical. TED = tuber eye depth: 1 = very deep, 5 = medium, 9 = very shallow. TCS = tuber cross section: 1 = very flat, 5 = intermediate, 9 = very round. 2 Internal Defects: HH = hollow heart, IB = internal browning. Total number observed out of 16 tubers. 0 = not observed. 3 Most of the green was cause by the dry soil conditions after vine kill. The soil had large cracks in it that let the tubers get green from the sun. Most of the growth cracks and misshapes came from the dry conditions and uneven rain fall this year. 28
33 Table 13. Total yield, greater than 1 7/8" yield, size distribution, percent pick outs and specific gravity for potato commercial trials of four varieties in 2013 in: A) Erie County, Kevin Troyer Farm; B) Schuylkill County, Nolan Masser Farm; C) Rock Springs, Plant Pathology Farm. About 200 lbs of each variety were planted in each location. Location Yield (cwt/a) 1 % % by size class 2 %PO 3 Specific Total >1 7/8" US# Gravity Kevin Troyer Farm AF Challenger Nicolet AF Dark Red Chieftain Nolan Masser Farm AF Challenger Nicolet AF Rock Springs AF Challenger Nicolet AF Yield Total = all yield including pickouts. Yield >1 7/8" = categories 2, 3, 4 and 5 excluding pickouts. 2 Percentage of total yield according to size class. 2= in., 3= in., 4= in., 5=>4.0 in. 3 Percentage of total that are pickouts. 29
2014 Tablestock "Select" Freshpack Potato Variety Trial Overall Average- Seven Locations
2014 Tablestock "Select" Freshpack Potato Variety Trial Overall Average- Seven Locations CWT/A PERCENT OF TOTAL 1 TUBER QUALITY 2 VINE VINE TYPE LINE US#1 TOTAL US#1 Bs As OV PO SP GR HH VD IBS BC VIGOR
More informationI. Paragraph descriptions of advanced selections from the Cornell Breeding Program
Contents of this Report I. Paragraph descriptions of advanced selections from the Cornell Breeding Program II. III. Summary tables comparing yield and specific gravity across trial sites Results from Cornell
More information2015 Statewide Chip Processing Potato Variety Trials Overall Average- Ten Locations
OTF CHIP RAW TUBER QUALITY 2 (%) SCAB VINE VINE LINE US#1 TOTAL US#1 Bs As OV PO SP GR SCORE 3 HH VD IBS BC RATING 4 VIGOR 5 MATURITY 6 COMMENTS MSV033-1 j 765 815 94 4 86 8 2 1.081 1.0 3 58 3 0 0.0 3.5
More informationMichigan Potato Research Report
Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station In Cooperation with the Michigan Potato Industry Commission Michigan Potato Research Report 2005 Volume 37 INTRODUCTION 2005 POTATO VARIETY EVALUATIONS
More information2005 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT
Horticulture and Crop Science Series No. 747 January 2007 2005 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT Matthew D. Kleinhenz, David M. Kelly, Senay Ozgen, John Y. Elliott, Elaine M. Grassbaugh, Matthew
More information2007 POTATO VARIETY EVALUATIONS. D.S. Douches, J. Coombs, J. Estelle, D. Berry, K. Zarka, C. Long, R. Hammerschmidt and W. Kirk
INTRODUCTION 2007 POTATO VARIETY EVALUATIONS Funding: Fed. Grant/MPIC D.S. Douches, J. Coombs, J. Estelle, D. Berry, K. Zarka, C. Long, R. Hammerschmidt and W. Kirk Departments of Crop and Soil Sciences
More information2013 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT
Horticulture and Crop Science Series No. 810 December 2013 2013 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT Matthew D. Kleinhenz, Jennifer B. Moyseenko, Sonia D. Walker and Bruce Williams Department of Horticulture
More informationPotato Variety Trials
Potato Variety Trials 1991-2006 PREPARED BY: D. WATERER J. BANTLE W. HRYCAN FUNDED BY: AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND Department of Plant Sciences University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan,
More information2016 Potato Outreach Program On-Farm Variety Trials Data Summary: Russet Variety Trials
2016 Potato Outreach Program On-Farm Variety Trials Data Summary: Russet Variety Trials Table of Contents 1..... 2016 Statewide Russet Potato Line Summary 2-3 2016 Tablestock Trial; Crawford Farms; Montcalm
More information2016 MAINE POTATO VARIETY TRIALS NE1231 REGIONAL TRIALS AND ADVANCED BREEDING LINES EXETER, PRESQUE ISLE, AND ST. AGATHA, MAINE
06 MAINE POTATO VARIETY TRIALS NE REGIONAL TRIALS AND ADVANCED BREEDING LINES EXETER, PRESQUE ISLE, AND ST. AGATHA, MAINE Gregory A. Porter, Professor of Agronomy Paul C. Ocaya, Research Associate Bruce
More information2015 Statewide Freshpack Potato Variety Trials Overall Average- Six Locations
COMMON SCAB VINE VINE TYPE LINE US#1 TOTAL US#1 Bs As OV PO SP GR HH VD IBS BC RATING 3 VIGOR 4 MATURITY 5 COMMENTS RED / PURPLE SKIN MST3861P aef 560 592 95 1 69 26 4 1.080 0 23 0 0 1.8 3.8 3.2 large
More information2016 Southwestern Regional. Potato Variety Trial Report
2016 Southwestern Regional Potato Variety Trial Report Table of Contents Description of Clones - 2016 Southwestern Regional Trial 1 Table 1. Locations, Cooperators, and Cultural Information 2 Table 2.
More informationPotato Breeding Program Research Update 2009
Potato Breeding Program Research Update 2009 Felix Navarro 1,3, Bryan Bowen 2, Sandra Vega 3 and Jiwan Palta 3 Asst. Scientist-Rhinelander Ag. Research Station 1 Superintendent Rhinelander Ag. Research
More informationEastern Regional Potato Trials 2005: Summary of NE1014 Regional Project Field Testing of New Potato Clones
ISSN 1070-1508 Eastern Regional Potato Trials 2005: Summary of NE1014 Regional Project Field Testing of New Potato Clones Florida, Chad Hutchinson, Douglas Gergela, and J. Marion White Maine, Gregory Porter
More information2017 Potato Outreach Program On-Farm Variety Trials
2017 Potato Outreach Program OnFarm Variety Trials Data Summary: Michigan Tablestock (NonRusset) Variety Trials Table of Contents 12.. 2017 Statewide Tablestock (NonRusset) Line Summary 3..2017 Tablestock
More informationEastern Regional Potato Trials 2004: Summary of NE1014 Regional Project Field Testing of New Potato Clones
ISSN 1070-1508 Eastern Regional Potato Trials 2004: Summary of NE1014 Regional Project Field Testing of New Potato Clones Florida, Chad Hutchinson and J. Marion White Maine, Gregory Porter and Paul Ocaya
More informationMaine Potato Breeding Program 2010 Growing Season
Maine Potato Breeding Program 2010 Growing Season Final Report January 2011 AF4545-1 AF3362-1 Harvest and Selection, Secondyear Russets and Longs, 2010 Seedling Tuber Harvest, Fall 2010 Harvest of Second-year
More informationTable of Contents. Description of Clones Southwestern Regional Trial 1. Table 1. Locations, Cooperators, and Cultural Information 2
Table of Contents Description of Clones - 2017 Southwestern Regional Trial 1 Table 1. Locations, Cooperators, and Cultural Information 2 Table 2. Percent Stand and Stems/Hill 3 Table 3. Vine Size and Vine
More informationPotato Breeding and Cultivar Development North Dakota
Potato Breeding and Cultivar Development North Dakota - 2001 Susie Thompson, Gary Secor, Jim Lorenzen Bryce Farnsworth, Mike Schwalbe, Ann Erickson and Abbas Lafta Department of Plant Sciences The North
More informationPotato Breeding and Selection
2014 Research Progress Report Potato Breeding and Selection Submitted by David G. Holm and Caroline Gray San Luis Valley Research Center to the Colorado Potato Administrative Committee (Area II) Research
More informationCover 2011 Field days held in (L R) Tulelake and Bakersfield, CA., Springlake, TX, and Center, CO.
2011 Southwestern Regional Potato Variety Trial Report Cover 2011 Field days held in (L R) Tulelake and Bakersfield, CA., Springlake, TX, and Center, CO. Table of Contents Description of Clones - 2011
More information2009 USPB/SFA Chip Variety Trials
Dr. Donald Halseth, Coordinator Department of Horticulture Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853 2009 USPB/SFA Chip Variety Trials Sponsored by The United States Potato Board & The Snack Food Association
More informationEVALUATION OF CARROT CULTIVARS AND BREEDING SELECTIONS TO IDENTIFY RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR BLIGHTS,
CARROT (Daucus carota subsp. sativus) Alternaria Leaf Blight; Alternaria dauci Cercospora Leaf Blight; Cercospora carotae R. V. James and W. R. Stevenson Department of Plant Pathology University of Wisconsin-Madison
More information2010 USPB/SFA Chip Variety Trials
Dr. Donald Halseth, Coordinator Department of Horticulture Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853 2010 USPB/SFA Chip Variety Trials Sponsored by The United States Potato Board & The Snack Food Association
More information2016 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations GROWER S EDITION. WSU Potato Research Group
2016 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations GROWER S EDITION WSU Potato Research Group 2016 Potato Cultivar Yield and Postharvest Quality Evaluations Washington State University Potato
More informationEconomics and Yield of Dry Bean Market Classes
Economics and of Dry Bean Market Classes Purpose: To evaluate the relative yield, seed quality, maturity and economics of different market classes of dry beans. To test a select number of promising commercial
More informationSection 4: Wheat Varieties
Section 4: Wheat Varieties 49 Wheat trials were planted in seven-inch rows at Blackstone, Orange, Holland, Painter, and Shenandoah Valley. They were planted in six-inch rows at Blacksburg. They were planted
More informationHard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma
Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma Varietal Trials Results, January 2006 Spring wheat varieties are compared in trial plots at Waseca, Lamberton, Morris, Crookston, Stephen,
More informationPREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES
PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES Corey V. Ransom and Joey Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon, 1997. Introduction Effective weed control and crop
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results
Wheat Tech Agronomy 2013-2014 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2013-2014 wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Humboldt,
More informationVarietal Trials Results
Varietal Trials Results January 2008 Wheat, Hard Red Spring Jim Anderson, Jochum Wiersma, Gary Linkert, Catherine Springer and Susan Reynolds differ for their response to each of those diseases, the rating
More information2010 North Central Region Potato Variety Trial
2010 North Central Region Potato Variety Trial Best Western - O Hare Chicago, IL December 13 14, 2010 Prepared By: Mr. Jeff Miller Department of Horticultural Sciences Table of Contents Pages I) NCRPVT
More information-Oregon Potato Variety Trials 1981
-Oregon Potato Variety Trials 1981 Special Report 674 December 1982 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis OREGON POTATO VARIETY TRIALS -- 1981 A.R. MOSLEY, M.J. JOHNSON, G.E.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1-5 RESEARCH PRESENTATION...6-15 I. OBJECTIVE ONE Measure Each Entry s Main and Ratoon Crop Yield and Milling Response With and Without Fungicide Under Intense and
More informationThis page intentionally blank.
This page intentionally blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Statewide Trials 1 Red Potato Trial -Urbana... 11 Observation Trial- Wooster... 12 Specialty Trial -Wooster... 15 Campbell Cultivar Trial -Napoleon... 17
More informationFIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY
173 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, E. Cullen, P.J. Flannery, and K.D. Kohn Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Corn Rootworm Hybrid Comparison Trial Experiment: 10 Corn
More information2003 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT
Horticulture and Crop Science Series No. 736 January 2004 2003 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT Matthew D. Kleinhenz, David M. Kelly, Nate Honeck, John Y_ Elliott, Elaine M. Grassbaugh, Matthew
More informationSelecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:
Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org First of of all, all, let s let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Genetic modification of corn has been
More information2017 Western Regional Red/Specialty Trial
2017 Western Regional Red/Specialty Trial Table of Contents Table 1 Trial Locations and Cultural Management Page 1 Table 2 Clone Descriptions Page 2 Table 3 Percent Stand Page 3 Table 4 Vine Size and Maturity
More informationSection 5: Wheat Scab Research
Section 5: Wheat Scab Research One of the primary research objectives of the Virginia Tech wheat breeding program is to identify and develop cultivars possessing resistance to Fusarium Head Blight (FHB)
More informationTable 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee
Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION Soybean Disease Ratings for Frogeye Leaf Spot, SDS & Stem Canker with Yields Maturity Group V (Late) 2003 Trial ID: 03SBFE5L Investigator: Dr. Melvin Newman Crop
More informationAFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5
REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO REGISTER PT769 CROP KIND: Wheat TYPE: Canada Western Red Spring PROPOSER: D. Spaner AS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5 TEST NUMBERS:
More informationWisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012
A3868 Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012 Shawn Conley, Adam Roth, John Gaska, and Mark Martinka The Wisconsin Winter Wheat Performance Tests are conducted each year to give growers information
More informationPredicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia
Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia Md. Rasel Parvej, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech David L. Holshouser, Extension
More informationApplying Molecular Marker information and Data Mining to a Commercial Breeding Pipeline
Applying Molecular Marker information and Data Mining to a Commercial Breeding Pipeline David V. Butruille, Ph.D. Data Mining Lead - Breeding Technology Monsanto Company Ankeny, IA ISU Plant Breeding Lecture
More informationSelecting Hybrids Wisely
First of of all, let s admit that Corn is a GMO! Selecting Hybrids Wisely Bob Nielsen Purdue University Email: rnielsen@purdue.edu Web: www.kingcorn.org Genetic modification of corn has been occurring
More informationOregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center
General Trial Information Investigator: Daniel A Ball Title: Professor Affiliation: Columbia Basin Ag. Research Postal Code: 97801 E-mail: daniel.ball@oregonstate.edu Trial Location City: Pendleton Trial
More informationControl of diseases in different cultivars
Applied Crop Protection 2014 III Control of diseases in different cultivars Lise Nistrup Jørgensen, Helene Saltoft Kristjansen, Sidsel Kirkegaard & Anders Almskou- Dahlgaard Control strategies in 6 wheat
More informationVital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas (903) FAX: (903) Crop Results
Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas 75647 (903) 845-2163 FAX: (903) 845-2262 2004 Crop Results Vitazyme on Potatoes Farmer: Jim Echeverria Researcher: Jon Gilley, Agro-Engineering,
More informationReport to the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission Title: Green Bean Breeding and Evaluation
Report to the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2007 2008 1. Title: Green Bean Breeding and Evaluation 2. Project Leaders: James R. Myers, Horticulture 3. Cooperator: Brian Yorgey, Food Science and
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results
2014-2015 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2014-2015 winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Auburn, Kentucky; Humboldt, Tennessee;
More informationFIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY
92 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn and T.H. Diallo Arlington, WI Valent BioSciences FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Trial Experiment:
More information2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1
PP310 2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1 Darcy E. P. Telenko, John Atkins, Nick Dufault, 2 This report includes a summary of the 2013 in-furrow
More informationSection 5: Wheat Scab Research
67 Section 5: Wheat Scab Research One of the primary research objectives of the Virginia Tech wheat breeding program is to identify and develop cultivars possessing resistance to Fusarium Head Blight ()
More information2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Extension Series No. E-10-2 November, 2010 2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences NYS
More informationSOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999
SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999 Erik B.G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, Peter Sexton, Lamont D. Saunders, and Rhonda Bafus Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, Oregon Introduction
More informationTHE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION
More informationWeed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon.
Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon. Four studies were conducted in ornamental bulbs during 1999-2000: (1) bulb herbicide plant-back study, (2) nonselective,
More informationFLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA W. H. Gay - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA
FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA S. S. LaHue - UGA W. H. Gay - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA Introduction Tobacco varieties play a pivotal role in yield and quality improvement programs. Moreover,
More informationInheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet
Inheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet Andrea Maas 1 * and Xinzhi Ni 1,2 1. Soybean Production Research, Monsanto Company, 36142 E. State Route 10, PO Box 33, Mason City, IL 62664,
More informationComparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015
Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015 Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Dillon Welter and Brent Breitenbach The objective of this trial was to evaluate
More informationSHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT
SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT The 2011 Shelby County State Bank Corn Plot was a replicated trial with each variety planted three times. Each variety had six rows and the rows were approximately
More informationEVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract
EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, 1998 Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris Abstract Evaluation of sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris) in central Oregon was conducted in commercial fields
More information2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands
; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section JLH17@cornell.edu Ithaca, South Central New York New York Locations Other than Ithaca
More informationFLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA
FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA Introduction Tobacco varieties play an essential role in yield and quality improvement programs. Moreover, a vital part
More informationOff-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.
Project Title: Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. Project Leader: D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana. Project Personnel: P.L. Bruckner MAES
More informationWheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:
2017-2018 Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: The 2017-2018 soft red winter wheat variety performance tests were conducted at three different sites: Adairville, Kentucky; Tenton,
More informationTexas Potato Breeding Report 2014
Texas Potato Breeding Report 2014 Texas A&M AgriLife Research Department of Horticultural Sciences Texas A&M University Creighton Miller, Douglas Scheuring, and Jeff Koym College Station and Lubbock After
More information2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results
01 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial
More information2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results
Field Crop Trials Results Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Spring wheat entries were sown in trial plots at Crookston, Lamberton,
More informationGiant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).
Comparison of PRE/POST and POST only Weed Control Systems in Liberty Link Soybeans at Rochester, MN, in 2011. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Adam Hazel and Bo Beyer The objective
More informationField Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils
Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils Manjula Nathan, Robert Kallenbach, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri
More informationComparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment
Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Behnken, Lisa M., Fritz R. Breitenbach, Ryan P. Miller and Kira Stearns The objective of this trial was
More informationUCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013
UCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013 Principal Investigator: Cooperating Personnel: Collaborators: Brenna Aegerter, Farm Advisor, UCCE San Joaquin County Jacob Loogman, Cheryl
More informationIntr o d u c t i o n Me t h o d s
North Carolina G. Craig Yencho and Mark E. Cloug h Depart m e n t of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, Plymouth NC Introdu c ti o n
More information(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center
(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Page 1 of 21 2009 Preplant Burndown and Post Emergent Weed Control In Soybeans with KFD compounds Trial ID: 09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD Protocol ID: 09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD Location:
More informationPROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH REGISTERING HYBRID RAPE VARIETIES. J.E. Ramsbottom, R.J. Jarman and S.P.J. Kightley
PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH REGISTERING HYBRID RAPE VARIETIES J.E. Ramsbottom, R.J. Jarman and S.P.J. Kightley National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK ABSTRACT Hybrid
More informationNational Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017
National Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017 1 Acknowledgments The successful execution of this project was only possible as a result of excellent co-operation of all stakeholders and the personnel of the
More information2016 Processing Tomato Guide
2016 Processing Tomato Guide About Us We are global. We are local. We are HM.CLAUSE. We specialize in the breeding, production, and sales of vegetable seeds. From the world market to the farmer s market,
More informationOHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATICN Northwestern Substation, Hoytville, Ohio. Department of Horticulture Mimeograph Series No. 204 March 29, 1960
OHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATICN Northwestern Substation, Hoytville, Ohio Department of Horticulture Mimeograph Series No. 204 March 29, 1960 FIELD TOMATO VARIETY TRIALS - 1959 Hoytville, Ohio WALTER
More informationPerformance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )
Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections (993-96) P.J. Landschoot, B.S. Park, A.S. McNitt, and D. Livingston Funding Sources: National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, The Pennsylvania Turfgrass
More informationI~I. Horticulture Series No. 631
Horticulture Series No. 631 January 1993 EVALUATION OF PROCESSING TOMATO BREEDING LINES AND CULTIVARS FOR MECHANICAL HARVESTING AND QUALITY IN 1992 S.Z. BERRY, K. WIESE, T.S. ALDRICH &K.L. SCAIFE II I
More information2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida
2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida Libbie Johnson and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2017 field corn small plot replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration
More informationKentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010
Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010 Table 1. Corn Hybrid Performance for Silage, Combined Sites (Adair and Mason counties), KY, 2010 Beck's 5675 HXR 22.9 3380 27000 0.81 0.55 7.4 21 37
More informationUC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002
Project Title: UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002 Project Leaders: Mike Murray Enrique Herrero Farm Advisor & County Director Post-graduate
More informationDate 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn
Weed Control and Crop Tolerance with SureStart Herbicide Programs in Field Corn Breitenbach, Fritz R, Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Nicole Behnken and Katherine Sheehan The objective of this trial was
More informationSwitchgrass plot following the 2011 harvest at Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, Streeter, ND.
Evaluation of Perennial Forages for Use as Biofuel Crops in Central and Western North Dakota Paul E. Nyren, Guojie Wang, Bob Patton, Quingwe Xue, Gordon Bradbury, Mark Halvorson, and Ezra Aberle Switchgrass
More informationRegional Feedstock Partnership 2011 Switchgrass Report
Regional Feedstock Partnership 211 Switchgrass Report Vance Owens and Chang Oh Hong Indianapolis, IN13-15 March 212 Field trial PIs: D. Bransby and C. Hopkins (AL), E. Heaton (IA), R. Farris (OK), R. Mitchell
More informationCorn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2006
Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 006 The Minnesota Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Program evaluates the silage potential of corn hybrids in Minnesota.
More informationRegional Feedstock Partnership 2010 Switchgrass Report
Regional Feedstock Partnership 21 Switchgrass Report Vance Owens South Dakota State University Knoxville, TN 15-17 February 211 Field trial PIs: D. Bransby and C. Hopkings (AL), E. Heaton (IA), R. Farris
More informationElectric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses
Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses Results of plug-in electric vehicle modeling in eight US states Quick Take M.J. Bradley & Associates (MJB&A) evaluated the costs and States Evaluated benefits of
More informationEvaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY
Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in 2012. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ryan P. Miller, Steve Reiter, and Brent Breitenbach The objective of this trial was to
More informationSequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.
Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015. Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Ellen Sheehan, and Brent Breitenbach
More informationHigh Plains Root-Knot Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016
High Plains Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016 Dr. Terry Wheeler, Research Plant Pathologist Texas A&M AgriLife Research Lubbock Mr. Kerry Siders, County Extension Agent - IPM Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
More informationRETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON
RETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 RETAIL BREAK EVEN AND IRR EXAMPLE FOR
More informationThe 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green
The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes Victor M. Green 302-275-1445 vmgreen@udel.edu Special thanks and appreciation is extended to the following people for whom this research would not have
More information2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases
2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases D. Peters, C. Gardner, M. Peters, M. Shen USDA-ARS GEM December 7, 2016 GEM IT & YT Statistics Report Dr. Dave Peters and Dr. Mack Shen USDA-ARS NCRPIS
More informationTitle: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area
Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area Personnel: John Miller and Gadi V.P. Reddy, Western Triangle Ag. Research Center, Conrad, MT. Dave Wichman, Central Ag. Research
More informationRoundup Ready Trial Page 12
; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section JLH17@cornell.edu LeRoy, Western New York, USDA Plant Hardiness Zone 6a Page 3 Ithaca,
More informationPerformance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/
ii/ W'm Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, 1988-89 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 136 September 1989 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Auburn University Lowell T. Frobish,
More information