Tables. for Product Testing Methods. Revised January 2013

Transcription

1 T Tables les for Product Testing Methods Revised January Hull Street Road Richmond, VA PH: FX:

2 TABLES BY SUBJECT page Table 1: Number of Correct Judgments: Duo-Trio and Directional 2-AFC Methods Table 2: Number of Correct Judgments: Triangular, 3-AFC, and Unspecified Tetrad Methods Table 3: Number of Correct Judgments: Preference and Non-Directional 2-AFC Methods Table 4: Delta for 2-AFC Method Table 5: Delta for Duo-Trio Method Table 6: Delta for 3-AFC Method Table 7: Delta for Triangular Method Table 8: Delta for Unspecified Method of Tetrads Table 9: Delta for Specified Method of Tetrads Table 10: Delta for Dual Pair Method Table 11: Variance of d for the 2-AFC Method Table 12: Variance of d for the Duo-Trio Method Table 13: Variance of d for the 3-AFC Method Table 14: Variance of d for the Triangular Method Table 15: Variance of d for Unspecified Method of Tetrads Table 16: Variance of d for the Dual Pair Method Table 17: Sample sizes for 2-AFC, Duo-Trio, Tetrad, and Triangle Methods...130, 131 Table 18: Equivalence Table, 95% Confidence Table 19: Equivalence Table, 99% Confidence Table 20: Unsurpassed Table, 95% Confidence Table 21: Unsurpassed Table, 99% Confidence Table 22: Count-Based Proportional Comparisons, 95% Confidence Table 23: Count-Based Proportional Comparisons, 99% Confidence Table 24: Count-Based Ratio Comparisons, 95% Confidence Table 25: Count-Based Ratio Comparisons, 99% Confidence Table 26: Tail Areas of Normal Table 27: Tau Values for Same-Different Method

3 Table 1. Duo-Trio and Directional 2-AFC Methods: Minimum Number of Correct Judgments for Significance at = n

4 Table 2. Triangular, 3-AFC, and Unspecified Tetrad Methods: Minimum Number of Correct Judgments for Significance at = n

5 Table 3. Preference and Non-Directional 2-AFC Methods: Minimum Number of Correct Judgments for Significance at = n

6 Table 4. 2-AFC Method: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of δ

7 Table 5. Duo-Trio Method: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of

8 Table 6. 3-AFC Method: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of δ

9 Table 7. Triangular Method: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of δ

10 Table 8. Unspecified Method of Tetrads: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of δ

11 Table 9. Specified Method of Tetrads: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of δ

12 Table 10. Dual Pair Method: Probability of a Correct Response ( 10 4 ) as a Function of

13 Table AFC Method: For a Particular d, Variance of d = (Table Value) / (Sample Size)

14 Table 12. Duo-Trio Method: For a Particular d, Variance of d = (Table Value) / (Sample Size) d' NA

15 Table AFC Method: For a Particular d, Variance of d = (Table Value) / (Sample Size) d'

16 Table 14. Triangular Method: For a Particular d, Variance of d = (Table Value) / (Sample Size) NA

17 Table 15. Unspecified Method of Tetrads: For a Particular d, Variance of d = (Table Value) / (Sample Size) NA 16,451 4, , ,