Development of an Instrumentation Suite to Measure Helmet Windblast and Impact Loading 23 June 24 John Plaga Human Effectiveness Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory Doug Coppess Glenn Thomas Greg Thompson General Dynamics Background Windblast forces during ejection impart potentially injurious head and neck loads Integrated Chin/Nape Straps (ICNS) have been recently installed on USAF helmets to increase stability Ejections have shown potential for head/headrest impacts Expanded crewmember range may result in lower tolerances to injuries 2 1
Problem Traditional ejection test manikins have limited head sensors Upper neck forces/moments Triaxial accelerometer Possibly angular (pitch) accelerometer Difficult to determine what exactly is contributing to the neck loading 3 Application Newton s Second Law ¾F = ma ¾ΣF = ma ¾F1 + F2 + F3 + Fn = ma Forces include Inertial Aerodynamic Reaction e.g. headrest force/impact Neck reaction force v v F = m a v v Γ = I α 4 2
Objectives Determine loads acting from helmet into head Helmet lift loads Chin strap tension Aft headrest impact Correlate a measurable force with neck tension as helmet is being lifted from head Determine if headrest impacts are injurious 5 Approach Measure neck loads Upper and lower neck forces and moments Measure head accelerations CG, Earplugs, angular pitch Measure other loading Aerodynamic Helmet static pressure Reaction (impact, e.g. headrest) Determine aerodynamic loading 6 3
Chin Strap Load Cell Small and light weight 15 grams Minimize inducing loads Titanium alloy Shaped for minimized friction Filleted or cylindrical edges Free rolling center shaft Two pairs of strain gages Full bridge Greater output Small, durable wiring Channels/pockets 7 Chin Strap Load Cell 8 4
Chin Strap Load Cell Loading 9 Chin Strap Calibration Chin Strap SN#6 (5-6-24) Mv's 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 25 Pounds 1 5
Skull Cap Load Cell 11 Skull Cap Load Cell CRABI Load Cell, Denton 2254 (FTSS-IF-954) Capacity Rotated so that Fx load is lift load and Fz is horizontal compression load Fx & Fy 2 lbs Fz 5 lbs Mx & My 5 in-lb Mz 3 in-lb 12 6
Skull Cap Load Cell 13 Modified Head Existing cap 1.56 lbs Modified head New Cap.63 lbs Load cell.31 lbs Adapter Plate.5 lbs Head ballasted to match 95th percentile head weight and CG 1.49 lbs (1.55 target) CGx =.25 (met target) CGx = 1.79 (1.77 target) 14 7
Testing Using Instrumentation Loading rate of approximately 33,4 N/s (7,5 lb/s) Test ends when MTS load reaches 45 N (1, lbs) or strap failure Actuator is an MTS hydraulic system that pulls the head downward out of helmet Load cells in manikin neck (internal) and top of bracket (not shown) 15 ICNS Dynamic Test Test terminated @ 45 N 3 Test Configurations: No Mask MBU-12/P Mask MBU-2/P Mask 16 8
MTS Test Data INT NECK Z FORCE (LB) INT SKULLCAP Z FORCE (LB) RIGHT CHIN STRAP FORCE (LB) Force (lbs) 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 Time (msec) 4 5 17 Force (lbs) or Torque (in-lbs) MTS Test Data 5 INT SKULLCAP X FORCE (LB) INT SKULLCAP Y FORCE (LB) INT SKULLCAP Z FORCE (LB) INT SKULLCAP Mx TORQUE (IN-LB) INT SKULLCAP My TORQUE (IN-LB) INT SKULLCAP Mz TORQUE (IN-LB) 4 3 2 1-1 1 2 3 Time (msec) 4 5 18 9
Results Helmet Pull Tests Chin Strap/Neck Z.2.17.15.9.1.1.9.5. Separate Chin/Nape, no mask ICNS, no mask ICNS, MBU-12/P ICNS, MBU-2/P Configuration Average peak neck tensile load Chin Lbs SCNS, no mask ICNS, no mask ICNS, MBU-12/P ICNS, MBU-2/P Fz Lbs 99 76 72 74 Linear relationship between neck load and chin strap load 62 817 743 832 19 Results Helmet Pull Tests Skull Cap FZ/Neck Z.4.35.32.3.3.2.1. ICNS, no mask ICNS, MBU-12/P ICNS, MBU-2/P Configuration Average peak neck tensile load Neck Fz Skull Fz Lbs Lbs ICNS, no mask 817 285 ICNS, MBU-12/P 743 226 ICNS, MBU-2/P 832 267 Linear relationship between neck load and chin strap load 2 1
Comparison with Rocket Sled Ejection Test Data (ICNS) 1 Peak neck tensile forces (lbs) 5 286.24 A ve r 59 51 5 47 5 44 43 9 2 39 36 47 ag e 35 6 13 59.35.3.25.2.15.1.5. Chin Strap/Neck Z Rocket Sled Ejection Tests Velocity (KEAS) 21 Ejection Test Differences Chin strap/neck tensile force MTS:.1 Ejection:.24 Not pure axial loading Aerodynamics Stagnation pressure Force on strap/load cell 22 11
Head/Neck Sensors for Follow-up Rocket Sled Testing HEAD ANGULAR ACCELEROMETER 23 / Ejection Seat Test 12
/ Ejection Seat Test 35 3 25 2 15 1 5-5 -1-15 -2 8.3 Skull Cap FX Skull Cap FY Skull Cap FZ 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.4 2 15 Neck Force X Neck Force Y Neck Force Z 1 5-5 -1-15 -2-25 8.3 25 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9 9.1 9.2 Other Uses Skull Cap Measure impacts to the back of the head Commercial and industrial helmet systems Motorsports Motorcycle Bicycle Hardhats Evaluation of the crashworthiness of vehicles Rearward impacts Rollover Falls from objects such as ladders The data can be used to assess the probability of injury 26 13
Results - Skull Cap Load Cell Testing "altered" the sensor Five of the six channels were out of zero spec. The metal wasn't located in the same geometry it was located when the gauges were initially applied Recommend at least a three-fold increase in range 27 Results Chin Strap Load Cell Effective in helmet pull and ejection seat tests Intermittent dropouts during windblast tests Enamelized wires likely contacting conductive surface Newest sensors use Teflon insulation Use of pockets around stain gages Better protection of strain gages Possibly better concentrate strain 28 14
Conclusions Both the skull cap load cell and chin strap load cell have been used in several test programs A few problems occurred that can be corrected in the future Higher range skull cap load cell Teflon insulated wires on chin strap load cell Pockets cut in chin strap load cell Use of this instrumentation suite can yield valuable data in the area of reducing neck injuries during ejection Can also be useful for other commercial applications 29 15