Test Report Load-bearing wall

Transcription

1 REPORT D B I Test Report Load-bearing wall Name of sponsor: Bygcom A/S Product name: File no.: Test date: Date: Pages: 10 Encl.: 52 Ref: JBK / NOL Jernholmen 12, DK-2650 Hvidovre Phone: dbi@dbi-net.dk Test Reg.no. 0012

2 File: Date: D B I Client information Client: Address: Bygcom A/S Hulvej 31 B 6731 Tjæreborg Danmark The results relate only to the items tested. The test report should only be reproduced in extenso - in extracts only with a written agreement with this institute. Page 2 of 10

3 File: Date: D B I Content 1 Date of test Purpose of test Test specimen Drawings and description... 5 Description... 5 Measured by Test conditions... 7 Conditioning... 7 Mounting... 7 Loading... 7 Fire test Test results... 7 Measurements... 7 Visual observations: Conclusion Remarks Page 3 of 10

4 File: Date: D B I 1 Date of test The test was conducted on Purpose of test The test specimen has been subjected to a standard fire test in accordance with the following standards: DS/EN :2012 Fire resistance tests General requirements DS/EN :1999 Fire resistance test - Part 2: Alternative and additional procedures in conjunction with DS/EN :2012 Fire resistance tests for loadbearing elements Part 1: Walls 3 Test specimen The trade name and sponsors identification mark is stated below: Trade name: Identification mark: None None The components for the test specimen were delivered and mounted by the sponsor. Page 4 of 10

5 File: Date: D B I 4 Drawings and description Details of the construction are shown in the enclosed documentation as stated below: Type Drawing No. Dated Subject Drawing A Tværsnit i testelement Drawing A Opstalt Drawing A Statisk virkemåde Drawing Montage af Fermacell fibergips Document Statiske beregninger for LGS elementer/søjle-dragersystem The documentation is supplied by the sponsor and it is stamped by - Danish Institute of Fire and Security Technology Description The test specimen consisted of the components described in the following. inspected the components during mounting, the test and after the test. The sponsor carried out the selection of the products for the test specimen as well as the mounting. Test specimen External measures: Height: 3000 mm Width: 2930 mm Thickness: 127 mm The test specimen was an insulated loadbearing wall with steel studs. Plaster and Calcium Silicate boards were fixed to the steel studs. The test specimen was asymmetrical and was tested with the fiber plaster boards towards the furnace. Loadbearing system External measures: Height: 3000 mm Width: 2930 mm Thickness: 89 mm Studs: 39/41 x 89 mm steel studs, designated U C89S41-1,2, with a thickness of 1.2 mm were used. The steel quality was S355. Placed with a c/c of 450 mm. In total 6 loadbearing studs were used. At the bottom and top end of the studs the web of the profile was compressed to allow it to fit into the rail. One stud was placed in each side to enable fixation of the boards. These studs were shortened to approximately 2850 mm in length and were therefore not loadbearing. Rails: 39/41 x 89 mm steel rails with a thickness of 1.2 mm. The steel quality was S355. Placed with a c/c of 1500 mm. The rail at mid height of the test specimen had cut holes for the studs. They were approximately 50 x 90 mm. Fixing: The studs and rails were fixed together with self-taping screws of Ø4.7x17 mm. One screw was used at top, bottom and mid height of a stud. Page 5 of 10

6 File: Date: D B I Insulation Insulation Glass wool designated Knauf SK ECObatt 037 with a nominal density of kg/m 3 and a thickness of 95 mm. The insulation was packed inside and between the steel profiles. Boards Plaster board: 2 layers of fiber plasterboards designated Fermacell Fiberboards were used on exposed side. The first layer was towards the studs and rails and consisted of boards with maximum dimensions of 15 x 900 x 3000 mm with a nominal density of 1150 kg/m 3. The second layer consisted of boards with maximum dimensions of 12.5 x 900 x 3000 mm with a nominal density of 1151 kg/m 3. The second layer of boards was shifted to the side with 200 mm compared to the first layer of boards. Calcium Silicate board: Fixing: One layer of calcium silicate board designated BYGCOM-CS were used on the unexposed side. The maximum dimensions for the boards were 10 mm x 900 x 2500 mm with a nominal density of kg/m 3. The first layer of plasterboards was fixed to the loadbearing system with Ø 2.3x30 mm nails from an air-pressure gun with a c/c of 200 mm. The nails were placed approximately 10 mm from the edge of the board. The second layer of plasterboards was fixed with 10.8 x 22 mm clamps from an airpressure gun with a c/c of 150 mm along the edge of the boards and into the first layer of plasterboards. The clamps were placed approximately 10 mm from the edge of the board. The Calcium Silicate boards were fixed to the loadbearing system with Ø 2.3x30 mm nails from an air-pressure gun with a c/c of 200 mm. The nails were placed approximately 10 mm from the edge of the board and 50 mm from joints. Sealant: Between the calcium silicate boards a filler designated Wurth MS Polymer 20 LM was applied. Over the joints on the calcium silicate boards tape designated Wurth Eurasol Max was applied. Measured by Product Fermacell 15mm Calcium Silicate ECO Batt 037 Fermacell 12.5mm board Density kg/m³ * Thickness mm 15,0 10,0 94,0 12,6 Moisture content % 1,73 5,70 0,63 1,32 Organic content % - - 6,08 - Sampling method Extra material Extra material Extra material Extra material Drying temperature 55 C 105 C 105 C 55 C *Outside the nominal span given by sponsor Page 6 of 10

7 File: Date: D B I 5 Test conditions Conditioning The test specimen was delivered on the to the laboratory and stored under room temperature. On the day of the fire testing the condition of the test specimen was similar with respect to its moisture content as the test specimen would be in normal service. Mounting The test specimen was mounted simple supported in a test frame suitable for loaded tests with a clear opening of 3000 x 3030 mm [height x width]. Free edges were established along both vertical edges of the test specimen (2 x 25 mm stone wool with alufoil in each side) to allow for unrestrained deformation of the test specimen. The test specimen was tested with the fiber plaster boards towards the furnace. Loading The test specimen was loaded with a total applied load of 28 kn/m during the test, corresponding to a total load of 75.6 kn. The load was applied centrally on the horizontal top beam, e.g. there was no eccentricity in the loading conditions. The loading conditions correspond to example d) in figure 1 in EN :2012. The figure describes the load transfer system at head with loading from above. The wall was simple supported at the bottom. The load was applied in 10 steps prior to the fire test. The fire test was commenced approx. 30 minutes after reaching the final load on the test specimen. Fire test Observations were made during the test on the general behavior of the test specimen. Temperature observations were taken continually during the entire testing time. The surface temperatures were measured on the unexposed surface of the test specimen as indicated on drawing No The furnace temperature was determined by means of plate thermocouples uniformly distributed at a distance of approximately 100 mm from the exposed side of the test specimen. The furnace temperature was continuously controlled so as to follow the standard time temperature curve within the accuracy specified in EN :2012. The thermocouples were constructed according to the description in EN : Test results Duration of the test was 63 minutes. Measurements The enclosed graphs and tables show: Page 7 of 10

8 File: Date: D B I Enclosures 2.0 and 2.1 Enclosures 3.0 and 3.1 Enclosures 4.0 and 4.1 Enclosures 6.0 and 6.1 Enclosures 7.0 and 7.1 Enclosures 8.0 and 8.1 Furnace temperatures The actual minimum-, average- and maximum furnace temperature in relation to the standard temperature. The table also shows the area under the actual time-temperature curve as well as the area under the standard timetemperature curve Average temperature rise Measured with 5 thermocouples Maximum temperature rise on the unexposed side of the wall Measured with 6 thermocouples Vertical deformation Positive values indicates movement towards the floor Vertical deformation rate The rate of deflection measured per minute Total load The load on the test specimen during the test Enclosures 9.0 and 9.1 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 2. stud from the left 450 mm from top Not required - only for information Enclosures 10.0 and 10.1 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 3. stud from the left at mid height Not required - only for information Enclosures 11.0 and 11.1 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 5. stud from the left 450 mm from top Not required - only for information Enclosures 12.0 and 12.1 Enclosures 13.0 and 13.1 Ambient temperature The ambient temperature in the laboratory during the test Vertical furnace pressure The differential pressure in the furnace during the test, measured 1,16 m above notional floor level Visual observations: Time / Visual observations: Minutes 0 Test commences U = Unexposed side E = Exposed side 9 No changes U 15 No changes on unexposed side U+E No significant changes on exposed side 16 Smoke from top part of left free edge U 21 Crack in board on exposed side E 25 The middle board has been released along the vertical side on exposed side E Page 8 of 10

9 File: Date: D B I 33 More cracks and distances in cracks increases on exposed side E 39 Liquid is emitted at the top of 2 nd load bearing stud from right side U 45 The first layer of boards on exposed side is no longer attached but is still standing in some E places 49 Second layer of boards starting to crack on exposed side E 50 Smoke from 1 st stud from the right side U 52 Many small cracks in the second layer of board exposed side E 57 Cotton pad test at first stud right side: no ignition no discoloration U 60 The second layer board on exposed side fell down E 60 Substantial deflection at horizontal board joint 2 nd board from the left U 62 Cotton pad test over horizontal board joint 2 nd board from the left: no ignition, no U discoloration 62 Gap gauge 5 mm could pass through the wall over 150 mm at the horizontal board joint 2 nd U board from the left 63 Pieces of outer board shattered off approximately 100 mm in diameter U 63 Test stopped The photographs on the attached photo sheets show the test specimen during the mounting, testing and after the test. See the description at each photo. 7 Conclusion Fire resistance testing according to EN :2012 of the construction described in this test report showed that failure according to the performance criteria stated in the test method occurred at the following time: Load-bearing capacity (R): 62 minutes The load on the test specimen was maintained during the first 62 minutes, after this point it was no longer possible to maintain the load on the test specimen. The measured vertical deflection did not exceed the criteria of C = h/100 = 30 mm during the test. The measured rate of vertical deflection did not exceed the criteria of dc/dt = 3h/1000 = 9 mm/min during the test. Integrity (E): 62 minutes Sustained flaming did not occur during the test. The cotton pad was not ignited during the test. Through-going openings in the test specimen were created at 62 minutes into the test. The 5 mm gap gauge could pass through the wall over 150 mm at a horizontal board joint Insulation (I): 62 minutes Failure of insulation occurred after 62 minutes of testing due to failure of integrity Page 9 of 10

10 File: Date: D B I The average during the test. during the test. 8 Remarks The field of direct application of the test results appears from EN :2012, clause 13. This report details the method of construction, the test conditions and the results obtained when the specific element of construction described herein was tested following the procedure outlined in EN , and where appropriate EN Any significant deviation with respect to size, constructional details, loads, stresses, edge or end conditions other than those allowed under the field of direct application in the test method is not covered by this report. Because of the nature of fire resistance testing and the consequent difficulty in quantifying the uncertainty of measurement of fire resistance, it is not possible to provide a stated degree of accuracy of the result. This report has only been printed in a pdf-version. has not issued a hard copy version. All values mentioned in this report are nominal values, production tolerances are not considered. Jeanne B Kirk M.Sc. (Eng) Niklas O. Lauersen M.Sc. (Civ.Eng.) Bygcom A/S Enclosures: 52 Hulvej 31 B drawings: Tjæreborg graphs and tables: 28 Danmark Photo sheets: 9 Sponsors drawings: 14 Page 10 of 10

11 All measurements are in mm Danish Institute of Fire and security Technology File No.: Sponsor: BygCom Test date: Subject: Placement of thermocouples - Loadbearing wall Enclosure: 1.0

12 [ C] Furnace temperature Test time [min] Min. Avg. Max EN Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

13 Furnace temperature Time Measured Norm Area under curve Minutes Minimum Average Maximum EN Measured EN Dev. [%] Limit [%] , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,0 3 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

14 [ C] Average temperature rise Measured with 5 thermocouples Test time [min] avg Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

15 Average temperature rise Measured with 5 thermocouples Min. / C Avg 1.Max Failure [min] Failure C Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

16 [ C] Maximum temperature rise on the unexposed side of the wall Measured with 6 thermocouples Test time [min] Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

17 Maximum temperature rise on the unexposed side of the wall Measured with 6 thermocouples Min. / C Max Failure [min] Failure C Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

18 [mm] Horizontal deformation of the wall Horizontal deflection of the wall (deflection towards the furnace are negative values) Test time [min] D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 D.6 D.7 D.8 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

19 Horizontal deformation of the wall Horizontal deflection of the wall (deflection towards the furnace are negative values) Min. / mm D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 D.6 D.7 D.8 0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2-1,5-1,7-0,6-2,2-2,5-2,3-0,5-1,7 4-1,7-1,4-0,3-2,4-2,5-2,1-0,6-1,4 6-2,4-2,3-0,7-3,5-4,2-3,2-0,8-2,1 8-3,8-4,4-1,5-5,2-6,4-5,6-1,0-3,6 10-4,1-5,3-1,1-5,5-6,8-6,2-1,9-4,3 12-4,2-5,2-0,9-5,3-6,8-6,2-2,3-4,3 14-4,1-5,3-0,7-4,9-6,7-6,2-2,3-4,3 15-3,9-5,1-0,7-4,6-6,5-5,9-2,2-4,2 16-3,6-4,9-0,6-4,2-6,3-5,7-2,1-4,1 18-3,5-5,0-0,4-3,9-6,2-5,7-2,1-4,2 20-3,4-4,8-0,3-3,7-6,2-5,7-2,1-4,1 22-3,3-4,8-0,3-3,3-6,0-5,7-2,2-4,4 24-3,0-4,7-0,1-3,1-5,7-5,5-2,1-4,1 26-2,7-4,6-0,1-2,7-5,5-5,5-2,2-4,1 28-2,8-4,7 0,0-2,7-5,4-5,5-2,3-4,1 30-2,7-4,8 0,0-3,0-5,4-5,3-2,2-4,0 32-2,7-4,7-0,2-2,8-5,2-5,3-2,4-4,1 34-2,5-4,7-0,1-2,6-4,9-5,3-2,6-4,0 36-2,2-4,6 0,1-2,3-4,7-5,1-2,5-4,0 38-1,9-4,5 0,0-1,9-4,2-4,6-2,3-3,7 40-1,6-4,3 0,1-1,7-3,8-4,3-2,5-3,6 42-1,6-4,3 0,3-1,4-3,8-4,2-2,4-3,4 44-1,7-4,7 0,2-1,6-3,9-4,3-2,6-3,5 46-2,4-5,2 0,2-2,2-4,9-4,8-2,5-3,9 48-3,8-6,6-0,1-4,0-7,7-6,5-2,6-5,1 50-5,5-8,6-0,5-6,7-11,5-9,4-2,7-6,7 52-8,0-11,6-1,3-10,9-16,9-13,8-3,1-9, ,8-15,3-2,0-16,1-23,6-19,6-3,6-13, ,6-20,1-3,4-23,0-31,6-26,8-4,9-19, ,5-23,7-4,9-30,1-38,6-32,2-5,9-21,3 60 3,6-7,9-3,7-12,6-6,4-11,1-7,9-14, ,9 8,2-4,7 2,4 27,0 12,2-17,3-7, ,1 15,5-7,8 6,5 38,8 23,7-28,0-4,1 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

20 [mm] Vertical deformation Positive values indicates movement towards the floor Test time [min] avg Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

21 Vertical deformation Positive values indicates movement towards the floor Min. / mm Avg 4.Max 0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 6 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 10-0,2-0,1-0,1-0,1 12-0,3-0,1-0,2-0,1 14-0,5-0,2-0,3-0,2 15-0,6-0,2-0,4-0,2 16-0,7-0,2-0,4-0,2 18-0,7-0,2-0,5-0,2 20-0,9-0,3-0,6-0,3 22-1,0-0,3-0,7-0,3 24-1,1-0,3-0,7-0,3 26-1,2-0,4-0,8-0,4 28-1,2-0,4-0,8-0,4 30-1,2-0,4-0,8-0,4 32-1,3-0,4-0,8-0,4 34-1,3-0,4-0,9-0,4 36-1,4-0,5-0,9-0,5 38-1,5-0,5-1,0-0,5 40-1,6-0,5-1,1-0,5 42-1,7-0,5-1,1-0,5 44-1,9-0,6-1,2-0,6 46-2,1-0,6-1,3-0,6 48-2,2-0,7-1,5-0,7 50-2,7-0,8-1,7-0,8 52-3,1-0,8-2,0-0,8 54-3,8-1,5-2,7-1,5 56-4,3-2,0-3,2-2,0 58-5,0-2,1-3,6-2,1 60-4,8-2,3-3,5-2,3 62-4,5-2,3-3,4-2,3 63-6,7-3,1-4,9-3,1 Failure [min] Failuremm 30,0 30,0 30,0 30,0 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

22 [mm/min] Vertical deformation rate The rate of deflection measured per minute 2,5 2 1,5 1 0, Test time [min] avg Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

23 Vertical deformation rate The rate of deflection measured per minute Min. / mm/min Avg 4.Max 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 0,01 0,00 0,00 0,01 4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8 0,00 0,01 0,00 0, ,17 0,03 0,10 0, ,08 0,02 0,05 0, ,09 0,01 0,05 0, ,07 0,03 0,05 0, ,07 0,02 0,05 0, ,03 0,01 0,02 0, ,08 0,03 0,05 0, ,04 0,02 0,03 0, ,03 0,01 0,02 0, ,06 0,02 0,04 0, ,01 0,01 0,01 0, ,01 0,00 0,01 0, ,04 0,03 0,03 0, ,02 0,01 0,02 0, ,00 0,00 0,00 0, ,03 0,01 0,02 0, ,08 0,00 0,04 0, ,07 0,00 0,04 0, ,07 0,03 0,05 0, ,10 0,03 0,07 0, ,08 0,04 0,06 0, ,28 0,06 0,17 0, ,18 0,02 0,10 0, ,34 0,25 0,29 0, ,38 0,21 0,29 0, ,28 0,07 0,17 0, ,40 0,06 0,23 0, ,06 0,00 0,03 0, ,26 0,77 1,51 2,26 Failure [min] Failuremm/min 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

24 [Ton] Total load The load on the test specimen during the test Test time [min] Load.1 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

25 Total load The load on the test specimen during the test Min. / Ton Load.1 0 7,5 2 7,6 4 7,5 6 7,6 8 7,6 10 7,6 12 7,7 14 7,7 15 7,6 16 7,6 18 7,6 20 7,7 22 7,7 24 7,6 26 7,5 28 7,6 30 7,6 32 7,6 34 7,6 36 7,6 38 7,6 40 7,6 42 7,7 44 7,7 46 7,6 48 7,7 50 7,6 52 7,7 54 7,5 56 7,6 58 7,7 60 7,6 62 7,6 63 1,4 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

26 [ C] 600 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 2. stud from the left 450 mm from top Not required - only for information Test time [min] S1.1 S1.2 S1.3 1 is placed on flange towards furance, 2 is placed on web, 3 is placed on flange away from furance. Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

27 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 2. stud from the left 450 mm from top Not required - only for information Min. / C S1.1 S1.2 S is placed on flange towards furance, 2 is placed on web, 3 is placed on flange away from furance. Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

28 [ C] 700 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 3. stud from the left at mid height Not required - only for information Test time [min] S2.1 S2.2 S2.3 1 is placed on flange towards furance, 2 is placed on web, 3 is placed on flange away from furance. Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

29 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 3. stud from the left at mid height Not required - only for information Min. / C S2.1 S2.2 S is placed on flange towards furance, 2 is placed on web, 3 is placed on flange away from furance. Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

30 [ C] 300 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 5. stud from the left 450 mm from top Not required - only for information Test time [min] S3.1 S3.2 S3.3 1 is placed on flange towards furance, 2 is placed on web, 3 is placed on flange away from furance. Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

31 Temperature rise inside construction measured on 5. stud from the left 450 mm from top Not required - only for information Min. / C S3.1 S3.2 S is placed on flange towards furance, 2 is placed on web, 3 is placed on flange away from furance. Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

32 [ C] Ambient temperature The ambient temperature in the laboratory during the test Test time [min] amb.1 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

33 Ambient temperature The ambient temperature in the laboratory during the test Min. / C amb ,8 2 19,6 4 19,4 6 19,0 8 18, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,2 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

34 [Pa] Vertical furnace pressure The differential pressure in the furnace during the test, measured 1,16 m above notional floor level Test time [min] pa.1 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,0

35 Vertical furnace pressure The differential pressure in the furnace during the test, measured 1,16 m above notional floor level Min. / Pa pa ,4 2-2,1 4 3,1 6 7,7 8 5,5 10 5,3 12 5,9 14 5,1 15 5,6 16 5,7 18 5,2 20 4,8 22 4,9 24 5,2 26 3,5 28 3,8 30 4,1 32 4,3 34 3,7 36 3,7 38 3,5 40 4,2 42 3,8 44 3,7 46 4,0 48 3,6 50 3,8 52 3,6 54 3,7 56 3,7 58 3,6 60 3,7 62 3,7 63 3,5 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure: ,1

36 [mm] Vertical deformation during the loading phase Positive values indicates movement towards the floor Test time [min] Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

37 Vertical deformation during the loading phase Positive values indicates movement towards the floor Min. / mm Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

38 [Ton] Total load during the loading phase The load on the test specimen during the loading phase Test time [min] Load.1 Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

39 Total load during the loading phase The load on the test specimen during the loading phase Min. / Ton Load Sponsor: Bygcom A/S Subject: Load-bearing wall File No.: Test date: Enclosure:

40 Photo No. 1 Static system before mounting in frame Photo No. 2 Close up of connection between rail and stud at mid height File No.: Page 1 of 9 Test date:

41 Photo No. 3 Close up of connection between rail and stud at mid height Photo No. 4 Stud against free edge is cut short in top and bottom File No.: Page 2 of 9 Test date:

42 Photo No. 5 Glass wool insulation in static system Photo No. 6 First layer of gypsum board on exposed side File No.: Page 3 of 9 Test date:

43 Photo No. 7 Second layer of gypsum board on exposed side Photo No. 8 Filler applied between boards on unexposed side of test specimen File No.: Page 4 of 9 Test date:

44 Photo No. 9 Test specimen seen from unexposed side Photo No. 10 Test specimen seen from unexposed side at test start File No.: Page 5 of 9 Test date:

45 Photo No. 11 Test specimen seen from unexposed side 15 minutes into the test Photo No. 12 Test specimen seen from unexposed side 29 minutes into the test File No.: Page 6 of 9 Test date:

46 Photo No. 13 Test specimen seen from unexposed side 45 minutes into the test Photo No. 14 Test specimen seen from unexposed side 60 minutes into the test File No.: Page 7 of 9 Test date:

47 Photo No. 15 Test specimen seen from unexposed side 61 minutes into the test Photo No. 16 Test specimen seen from unexposed side 62 minutes into the test File No.: Page 8 of 9 Test date:

48 Photo No. 17 Test specimen seen from unexposed side after test Photo No. 18 Test specimen seen from exposed side after the test File No.: Page 9 of 9 Test date:

49 Ydervægskonstruktion: - x mm Facadebeklædning - 10mm BYGCOM-CS - 89mm BYGCOM Stålprofil m. Isolering - 90mm Knauf EcoBatt - Mineraluld Klasse 37, 15-20kg/m³ - 15mm Fermacell fibergips retkant - 12,5mm Fermacell fibergips retkant 3000mm 1500mm Udvendig side Indvendig side Brandtest Tværsnit i testelement Mål: 1 : 5 Bygcom A/S Hulvej 31 B 6731 Tjæreborg DK INFO@BYGCOM.COM Tlf.: Dato: Sag nr.: Tegn. nr.: 11/30/17 and Number A1.3

50 Opstalt af stålprofiler 2930 Opstalt af CS-Plade kn/m Ekstra ikkebærende profil BYGCOM-C89 Vægelement + CS: Profiltype: C89 mm Profilafstand lodret: 450 mm Profilafstand vandret: 1500 mm Elementbredde: 2930 mm Elementhøjde 3000 mm Belastning i brandtilfælde 28 kn/m Plade dim. 1. lag: 10 mm Fermacell (indv. side): Plade dim. 1. lag: 15 mm Plade dim. 2. lag: 12,5 mm Plade størrelse L x B: 3000 x 900 mm Elementbredde: 2930 mm Elementhøjde 3000 mm Udsømning i lag 1 mod stål: Udsømning i lag 2 mod plade: cc200 cc150 Brandtest Opstalt Mål: 1 : 20 Plade størrelse L x B: 2500 x 900 mm Udsømning i lag 1 mod stål: cc200 Plader monteres med 1mm luft i samlinger. Alle samlinger tætnes med fugemasse som ved normal leverance fra BYGCOM. Plader monteres med 1mm luft i samlinger. Der anvendes ingen lim eller spartel, herved sikres at værste tilfælde testes. Plader monteres jf. Fermacell's montageanvisninger - Dokument 03. Bygcom A/S Hulvej 31 B 6731 Tjæreborg DK INFO@BYGCOM.COM Tlf.: Dato: Sag nr.: Tegn. nr.: 11/30/17 and Number A1.4

51 Opstalt af stålprofiler 28 kn/m 12,6 kn 12,6 kn 12,6 kn 12,6 kn 12,6 kn 12,6 kn Beregnet last i kn/m - Baseret på 40 kn/m og omregnet til brændtilfælde. 28 kn/m fordelt som punktlaster (12,6 kn/stud) i de enkelte profiler. Endeprofiler er ikke bærende. Ekstra ikkebærende profil Note: Lastopstilling er udført jf. Eurocodes: 1. EN 1990: Table 1.2 (B) - Patern EN : Punkt 4.3 (4.3.1, 3.2, 4.3.3) 3. EN : Punkt Brandtest Statisk virkemåde Mål: 1 : 20 Bygcom A/S Hulvej 31 B 6731 Tjæreborg DK INFO@BYGCOM.COM Tlf.: Dato: Sag nr.: Tegn. nr.: 12/15/17 and Number A1.5

52 2,93 m 0,20 m 3,00 m 0,45 m 0,65 m 0,20 m 0,79 m 0,90 m 0,90 m 0,34 m 0,59 m 0,90 m 0,90 m 0,54 m Montage: 1 pladelag 15 mm FermacellFibergips 2 pladelag 12,5 mm Fermacell Fibergips 1 pladelag. 15 mm fermacell fibergips monteres direkte i st l bygcom st lprofil med søm (Tjep/Bygcom anvisning) 2 pladelag. 12,5 mm fermacell fibergips er forskudt 200 mm lodret og vandret, monteres i 1 pladelag med mm CD klammer i r kker <= 400, afstand min 150 mm COMPANY LOGO Ansvar: knielsen Dato: Kontrol: 12/14/2017 Fermacell Scandinavia Kirkevej 3 DK-8751 Gedved Tlf. (+45) Projekt Navn: Addrasse: Kontakt :

53 Statiske beregninger for LGS elementer/søjle- Dragersystem BYGHERRE: SAG: BYGCOM A/S Brandtest SAGS. NR.: - DATO: UDFØRT AF: Robert Nagrodzki/Morten Jensen

54 Indhold Kalkulation for max belastning Real Case... 3 Kalkulation i Brandilfælde

55 Kalkulation for max belastning Real Case PROFILE Nr: 1 Name: "U C89S41-1,2" X 1.2 Y y x 1.2 V=41.0 H=89.0 Scale 1:1 PROFILE SPECIFICATION: Material: 3 S Princ.Centr.axis of inertia[cm]: Xc= 4.5 Yc= 2.8 alfa= 90.0 Moments of inertia [cm4]: Jx= 5.1 Jy= 28.3 Moment of deviation [cm4]: Dxy= 0.0 Princ.moments of inertia [cm4]: Ix= 28.3 Iy= 5.1 Radius of gyration [cm]: ix= 3.6 iy= 1.5 Resistance index [cm3]: Wx= 6.4 Wy= 3.9 Wx= -6.4 Wy= -1.9 Profile surface [cm2]: F= 2.2 Mass [kg/m]: m= 1.8 Moment of inertia for bending in frame plane [cm4]: Jzg= Nr. Notation Fi: Xs: Ys: Sx: Sy: F: [deg] [cm] [cm] [cm3] [cm3] [cm2] U C89S41-1,

56 JOINTS: V=3.000 H=3.000 SECTION DIMENSIONS: Nr. A[cm2] Ix[cm4] Iy[cm4] Wg[cm3] Wd[cm3] h[cm] Material: S MATERIAL CONSTANTS: Material: Module E: Ultimate stress: AlfaT: [kn/mm2] [N/mm2] [1/K] S E-5 4

57 MATERIAL ACCOUNT: Mark: Material: Length[m] Mass[t] U C89S41-1,2 S x x x 0.30 = FRAME TOTAL MASS: LOADS:

58 LOADS: ([kn],[knm],[kn/m]) Member: Type: Angle: P1(Tg): P2(Td): a[m]: b[m]: Group: CW "Steady load" Constant f= 1.35/1.00 Group: P "Reaction" Variable f= Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform ================================================================== R E S U L T S PN-EN 1900 Theory I-order RM_Win v license ================================================================== LOAD SECURITY COEFFICIENTS: Group: Importance: f: 0/ 1/ 2: CW-" Steady load " Constant 1.35/1.00 P -"Reaction" Variable /0.5/

59 Kalkulation i Brandilfælde PROFILE Nr: 1 Name: "U C89S41-1,2" X 1.2 Y y x 1.2 V=41.0 H=89.0 Scale 1:1 PROFILE SPECIFICATION: Material: 3 S Princ.Centr.axis of inertia[cm]: Xc= 4.5 Yc= 2.8 alfa= 90.0 Moments of inertia [cm4]: Jx= 5.1 Jy= 28.3 Moment of deviation [cm4]: Dxy= 0.0 Princ.moments of inertia [cm4]: Ix= 28.3 Iy= 5.1 Radius of gyration [cm]: ix= 3.6 iy= 1.5 Resistance index [cm3]: Wx= 6.4 Wy= 3.9 Wx= -6.4 Wy= -1.9 Profile surface [cm2]: F= 2.2 Mass [kg/m]: m= 1.8 Moment of inertia for bending in frame plane [cm4]: Jzg= Nr. Notation Fi: Xs: Ys: Sx: Sy: F: [deg] [cm] [cm] [cm3] [cm3] [cm2] U C89S41-1,

60 JOINTS: V=3.000 H=

61 LOADS: LOADS: ([kn],[knm],[kn/m]) Member: Type: Angle: P1(Tg): P2(Td): a[m]: b[m]: Group: CW "Steady load" Constant f= 1.35/1.00 Group: P "Reaction" Variable f= Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform

62 ================================================================== R E S U L T S PN-EN 1900 Theory I-order RM_Win v license ================================================================== LOAD SECURITY COEFFICIENTS: Group: Importance: f: 0/ 1/ 2: CW-"Steady load" Constant 1.35/1.00 P -"Reaction" Variable /0.5/