ELIPTIC - optimising existing electric Public Transport infrastructure Thomas Mourey Polis

Transcription

1 ELIPTIC - optimising existing electric Public Transport infrastructure Thomas Mourey Polis 1

2 ELIPTIC electrification of public transport in cities Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation project 33 partner in 8 Countries Coordinator: Freie Hansestadt Bremen 20 use cases (demo + feasibility studies) Duration, 36 months:

3 Potential of using existing public transport infrastructure 3

4 Objectives Evaluate the costs, benefits and operating efficiency of 20 use cases Support take-up of business cases Develop political support for the electrification of public transport Analyse 3 thematic pillars 4

5 Three thematic technology pillars E-buses Safe integration into existing electric PT infrastructure Energy efficient electric PT system Multi-purpose use of electric PT infrastructure 5

6 20 Use Cases + 11 Twinnings + User Forum (PTO / PTA) + UITP, POLIS, VDV, ASSTRA, LCVP <Event> <Date> <Location> <Speaker>

7 SCENARIO COMPARISON Charging concept Battery concept Low Capacity / High power Medium Capacity / Medium Power Large Capacity / Low Power Opportunity- Charging Public Grid Tram/Metro grid Overnight-Depot-Charging Barcelona Brussels Oberhausen Leipzig Warsaw London Bremen Charging on route Gdynia Szeged Eberswalde 7

8 Pillar A the example of Barcelona Opportunity (re)charging and overnight charging Barcelona 8

9 Pillar A the example of Oberhausen Opportunity (re)charging & sub-stations and tram catenaries Oberhausen 9

10 Pillar A the example of Gdynia Trolley and trolley-hybrid buses Gdynia 10

11 Pillar B the example of Gdynia Optimised braking energy recovery with supercapacitor Gdynia 11

12 Pillar C the example of Oberhausen Fast-charging stations for e-cars powered from the tram network Oberhausen 12

13 Pillar C the example of Oberhausen Fast-charging stations for e-cars powered from the tram network Oberhausen 13

14 Towards a Business Case for electric buses Costs per passenger km Environment Energy Infrastructure Maintenance Batteries Vehicles 0,045 0,040 0,035 0,030 0,025 0,020 0,015 0,010 0, /pkm 0, /pkm /pkm 0,0028 0,0142 0,0048 0,0048 0,0042 0,0042 0,0033 0,0033 0,0033 0,0049 0,0049 0,0049 0,0124 0,0124 0,0124 0,000 2 buses 8 buses 8 buses + external costs 1) Consideration of scaling effects of infrastructure only 2 buses at the moment, but 8 possible on this line opp. charging infrastructure costs per km significantly reduced 2) Consideration of external factors (environmental costs) penalty costs for emission of pollutants and noise in urban areas during operation (no consideration of production etc.) 14

15 TCO comparison of all three concepts & diesel 0,04 /km Costs per passenger km 0,03 /km 0,02 /km /km /km 0,003 0,003 0,0076 0,0048 0,004 0,004 0,0049 0,0067 0, /km 0,003 0,0094 0,001 0,0067 0, /km 0,007 0,0141 Environment Energy Infrastructure Batteries Maintenance 0,01 /km 0,004 0,006 Vehicles 0,012 0,009 0,012 0,008 0,00 /km Barcelona Oberhausen Bremen Std. Diesel EU 6 15

16 Factor 100 Passenger car Bus (18m) Daily usage < 1 hour hours Small (- medium) Engine size Big 50-60% Diesel Fuel % Diesel 500 l gasoline/ Diesel Diesel: PM 10 + NO 2 Gasoline: low Annual fuel consumption local pollutants 40,000 l Diesel Diesel: PM 10 + NO 2 1 CO 2 emission p.a. Equals ~ 100to app. 100 electric passenger cars Total impact

17 Factor 100 < 1 hrs/d...but not 100 fold financial support! hrs/d

18 Thank you for your attention! Join us at the ELIPTIC Final Conference, Bremen, 26/27 April, Registrations open Website: Follow us on Join us on LinkedIn: CIVITAS ELIPTIC - Electrification of public transport in cities Thomas Mourey Polis Tmourey@polisnetwork.eu 18