Milchprüfring Bayern e.v.

Transcription

1 Milchprüfring Bayern e.v. High Level Raw Milk Testing and more DAP-PL AIA Meeting 5 December Dr. Christian Baumgartner December 2008 Montegrotto Terme, Italy

2 Agenda Situation in Germany frame for raw milk analysis structures Milchprüfring Bayern e.v. organisation and assignments facilities and performance Questions and Discussion

3 General situation in Germany Germany is a Federal Republic! Quality and Payment Scheme (QPS) is combined on laboratory level with DHI QPS is supervised by state(s) federal law (Milch GüteVO) regional responsibilities (and funding - partly) labs are in charge of regional authorities

4 Legal background EU Food Hygiene Law (853/2004 etc.) Regulation for Milk Quality and Payment national control system for SCC, TBC and inhibitors German Federal Regulation for Implementation (by-law 15 August 2007) Bavaria letter from Veterinary Service (10 March 2008)

5 Structure in Germany

6 Structure in Germany ( ) farms, under DHI cows, under DHI QPS 50% samples 28% staff ~9.5 mio QPS samples farms, under DHI ~35 mio DHI samples cows, under DHI 16 labs, ~330 staff ~4.9 mio QPS samples ~50 combi-analyzers ~9.3 mio DHI samples DHI 44% farms 28% cows 1 lab, 92 staff 12 combi-analyzers Bavaria ( )

7 situation in Germany QA ring trials

8 33 labs from Austria Czech Republic Germany Hungary Italy Slovenia Switzerland

9 Milchprüfring Bayern e.v.

10 The Organisation registered non-profit association (e.v.) tax free 9 members associations of the Bavarian Dairy Industry all committees and boards are staffed equally by the three main groups farmers private dairy companies cooperative dairies

11 Members (9) Hans Epp farmer Board (3) Dr. Franz Mayer Meggle Dr. Karl Kunz Goldmilch eg Advisory Board (12) On-Farm Audit Board (8) Management honorary full-time 220 Employees

12 57% 41% 36% 7% Assignments Milk Quality and Payment Regulation in charge of The State of Bavaria (working as an administrative body) Laboratory Analyses for dairies for DHI organisation ( cows) On-Farm Audits for The State of Bavaria for dairies sampling (650 tankers) cooled transport lab analyses (5.5 mio. samples per year) interpretation and validation of results monthly statement of account for milk payment of 80 dairies and farmers Budget mio Substitution by State of Bavaria and Dairy Fund 5.7 mio

13 farms from outside Bavaria

14 Analytical Facilities 12 Kombi-FOSS Fossomatic 6000 MilkoScan FT 6000 lab capacity samples/h 6 Bactoscan FC 150 equipped with conveyor systems BARTEC 2 Robotic Systems for Inhibitor Testing 3 Sorter Systems for selecting samples 1 Skalar Aceton mighty LIMS (!!!) with satellite PCs samples/h

15 Quality Assurance all-embracing QA-System TQM Accreditation DIN EN ISO by Certified according to DIN EN QSE ISO GmbH 9001 Supervision by LfL-IEM (Agency of the Bavarian Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry) technically and Inhibitor legally Test Systems Internal and external audits by Participation in more thanaim 40 national GmbH and international ring trials per year Certified Reference Materials

16 Quality Assurance all-embracing QA-System TQM Accreditation DIN EN ISO by Certified according to DIN EN QSE ISO GmbH 9001 Supervision by LfL-IEM (Agency of the Bavarian Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry) technically and legally Internal and external audits Participation in more than 40 national and international ring trials per year Certified Reference Materials

17 Deep frozen reference material raw milk (!!!) without additives characterized by 8 international reference labs (GER, AUT, NL) 4-step-calibration-standards (for SI) multi-component-standard for daily calibration

18 Deep frozen reference material big batches used for 4 months overlapping comparisons proven homogeneity (<0.02% fat) anchor material over time shelf life?? years

19 Stability of five years batches 0,1 0,09 0,08 0,07 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,01 0-0,01-0,02-0,03-0,04-0,05-0,06-0,07-0,08-0,09-0,1 Dez 98 Apr 99 Aug 99 Dez 99 Apr 00 Aug 00 Feb 01 Jun 01 Sep 01 Jan 02 Jun 02 Sep 02 Jan 03 F 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 Deviation Fat-% Month of Production

20 Quality Assurance all-embracing QA-System TQM Accreditation DIN EN ISO by Certified according to DIN EN QSE ISO GmbH 9001 Supervision by LfL-IEM (Agency of the Bavarian Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry) technically and Inhibitor legally Test Systems Internal and external audits by Participation in more thanaim 40 national GmbH and international ring trials per year Certified Reference Materials

21 Inhibitor testing requirements robust test sheep and goats (colostrum) automation 2.5 mio. samples/year detection limits MRL ß-Laktams Makrolides, Aminoglycosides, Chinolones Tetracyclines (OTC ) conformance according to accreditated method

22 AiM GmbH - Munich long experience since 1968 / AiM founded for the Bavarian Dairy Industry highly specialized on microbiological inhibitor testing systems up-to-date developments (e.g. test for Penase, OTC at MRL level, test for manure ) offering complete solutions (tests, reference materials, consumables, know-how / seminars)

23 Summing up MPR is dedicated to high quality raw milk testing on an industrial level up to samples per day up to validated single results per day MPR covers the whole chain from sampling to reporting MPR is innovative and offers solutions

24 Thank you for listening! Questions?

25

26 automated raw milk lab highest quality standards Locations History until mio tons milk farms 80 dairies QSE GmbH Wolnzach 14.5 mio samples 55 mio analyses AiM GmbH

27 Lab Productivity +31% -23% samples / FTE and month FTE Lab ICAR benchmark samples per lab tech per hour rank 2 of 15

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36 1 Zero point of the diagram = base value = mean of all single values after elimination of outliers 2 Limit for maximum allowable 3 deviation depends on the standard deviation of the resp. test Deviation of sample 1 from base value 4 Deviation of sample 2 from base value Youden plot 5 Symbol for participating country and reference method (R)

37 Time series one instrument first latest participation of device deviation sample 1 sample 2 upper limit lower limit Fig. 4