Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research

Transcription

1 Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction Volume 2 Issue 2 The Journal of Mine Action Article 2 June 1998 Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research Stefan Havlík Peter Licko Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Havlík, Stefan and Licko, Peter (1998) "Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research," Journal of Mine Action : Vol. 2 : Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction by an authorized editor of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact dc_admin@jmu.edu.

2 Havlík and Licko: Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research Stefan Havlík and Peter Licko Issue 2.2 June 1998 Information in this issue may be out of date. Click here to link to the most recent issue. Introduction Current methods for detecting and removing mines are dangerous, too costly, and, considering the number of abandoned mines, very slow. Mechanical systems are most frequently used to clear large areas polluted by mines. Mechanical systems usually consist of a tank that uses rollers to apply pressure to the ground, rotary flails that beat the ground, or a rake that unearths and presses the mines. The main drawback of purely mechanical demining is that no system can satisfy the desired 100% reliability of humanitarian demining. Consequently, all cleaned areas require manual verification. Thus, an urgent need exists to develop safe and efficient demining methods. This requirement represents a big challenge for robotic research. Research for detecting and localizing mines is still ongoing. In addition to known methods, new sophisticated sensing principles are under development [1,3]. These sensing principles make it possible to detect and recognize mines as hidden objects. Several vehicles equipped with demining technology also are being produced [2]. Robotic Demining Systems In general, mine clearing procedures consist of two tasks: detecting and localizing landmines, and neutralizing landmines (removing or destroying mines in place). A robotic mine clearance system consists of the following subsystems (See Figure 1): Mobility system. The mobility system is based on a remotely controlled semiautonomous mobile (robotic) vehicle that functions as the unified porter of other equipment for detecting and neutralizing mines. Conditions and requirements for solving such a mobile robot are briefly discussed below. Two examples are also given. Published by JMU Scholarly Commons,

3 Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 2, Iss. 2 [1998], Art. 2 Multi sensorial system for detecting and recognizing mines. In principle, the sensory system can be situated either on a special platform for scanning dangerous terrain in front of the vehicle or behind the vehicle for verifying the demining procedure. The system for destroying and neutralizing mines. In addition to mechanical systems such as rollers, ploughs, flails, and rakes, other principles can be used to activate mine explosions. Such principles include explosive hoses, fuel air mixture, directed energy systems, laser technologies, microwave technologies, and sniper rifle. The positions and coordinates of objects that are recognized as mines are used as input data. Control and communication systems. The principle requirement is that such a demining vehicle should operate in a remote control mode or, at least, semi autonomously. A general control system includes mobility navigation and control, positioning of the sensing or marking apparatus, and target positioning for the destruction system. The communication system transfers large amounts of control and sensory data to the operator. Figure 1: Global scheme of a robotic semiautonomous demining system Detecting and Localizing Mines Sensory equipment for detecting and localizing mines plays a crucial role in any demining system. The table below (Table 1) presents several potential sensing technologies that are capable of detecting and recognizing mines [6]. When comparing these technologies, one can see that each of them exhibits some specific efficiency features; however, one must also take into consideration the cost and complexity. It is clear that no single sensor can detect all kinds of mines. Instead, a fusion of information from several sensory systems is required. 2

4 Sensor technology Maturity Cost and efficiency Non metal mine detection Metal detection Available Low + Infrared Near Medium +++ Electro optical Near Medium +++ Multi/hyper spectral Far High ++ Passive mm wave Far High ++ Mm wave radar Near High ++ Ground Penetrating Radar Near Medium ++ Ultra wide band radar Far High ++ Active acoustic Mid Medium ++ Active seismic Mid Medium +++ Magnetic field sensing Near Medium + Neutron activation analysis Charged particle detection Near High +++ Far High ++ Nuclear quadrupole Far High + Resonance Mid High + Chemical Far High +++ Bio sensors Available Medium +++ Dogs / rates Available Low +++ Prodding Havlík and Licko: Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research +++(good) Table 1 Robotic Technology Requirements +(poor) When building robotic technology, one first needs to build a universal all terrain robotic system that is highly mobile and lightweight. Furthermore, this system should be able to be used in demining work anywhere around the globe. Although such a system could be realizable when one takes the current state of technology into consideration, there is no reason to spend so much money and enormous human effort to develop such a complicated high tech system. Instead, a robotic system should satisfy specific conditions directly related to its local application. We outline some of these below. General. Mines are deployed mainly in poor, third world countries where salaries for this dangerous work are relatively low. Under such conditions, using standard hand searching technologies is more advantageous. The local population's technical knowledge is very limited Published by JMU Scholarly Commons,

5 Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 2, Iss. 2 [1998], Art. 2 and access to high technology components is almost nonexistent. Local materials, local manufacturing, and local manpower should be used to perform demining operations and to maintain all technology. Mechanics. Low tech and lightweight mechanics are highly desirable. An example is a bicycle like solution with practically all components locally available and easily reparable anywhere in the world. Electronics. Hardware and software parts do not have to be built based on the most sophisticated technology. More importantly, all systems should be resistant to occasional explosions or any possible actions due to errors, such as operator errors or shocks during transport. Sensors. Development and availability of cheap, lightweight, reliable sensors can certainly solve the majority of demining problems. Control. Remote or semi autonomous control that reduces the risk to human operators is desirable. The complexity and level of training for local operators should correspond to their local talent and technical education. An understandable and robust system with minimum training effort is preferred. Operational requirements A robotic system should meet some essential requirements, which are proposed below. Essential requirements are not discretionary; desirable requirements appear in parentheses and are for guidance. Reliability: Depth of demining: Width of Clearance: Speed of Clearing: 100% clearance 20 (50) cm 3.0 (4.0) meters 3.0 (5.0) km/hr Slopes during demining: Longitudinal: 20% (25%) Lateral: 10%, (15%) System deployment: To be self deployed to operation location. 4

6 Havlík and Licko: Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research Self recovery: Vehicles can operate in pairs. Each system should have a winch so that a second vehicle can recover the first. Obstacles: Climatic conditions: Types of mines: The system should be able to operate and overcome obstacles characteristic of and specific to a particular post war country. Such obstacles include ditches and old trench systems, water or mud terrain, stones, sand, holes, trees, bamboo, and coppice. Conditions to be considered include working temperatures, humidity, rains. Any density or types of mines are possible. Examples of two robotic systems are given below. A Cable Suspended Robotic Platform for Searching Dangerous Terrain The cable suspended robotic platform [4] in Figure 2 consists of three columns with winch mechanisms, such as cable drivers and measuring systems built on remotely controlled vehicles. The ends of the cables are fixed to the moving platform. This parallel kinematic structure exhibits 3 d.o.f. positional capability above the terrain. This configuration exhibits the following advantageous features: large workspace of operation that is reconfigurable according to actual terrain conditions, lightweight and easily transportable, fast and simple on site installation, as well as operation and control with Cartesian coordinates that are defined directly on site. The platform is equipped with several ultrasound sensors that enable operators to control its motion within a given distance over dangerous terrain as well as to avoid any obstacles when performing searching motions. Published by JMU Scholarly Commons,

7 Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 2, Iss. 2 [1998], Art. 2 Figure 2: Principal mechanical configuration The platform carries equipment for detecting and neutralizing mines. When performing scanning motions, it is possible to create a map of all objects that have been detected and recognized as mines (see Figure 3). Figure 3: Concept of the demining operation Four main problems have been solved for this system. These are kinematic and force analysis, coordinated motion control in global coordinates, dynamic analysis and control, as well as calibration. The Bozena Demining Flail 6

8 Havlík and Licko: Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research System Concept Several vehicles equipped with such devices have been built mainly based on military vehicles. The system discussed below represents a further modification of the small loader that is, a vehicle that manipulates loose materials and terrain works. The importance and real need for a demining system motivated our researchers and design engineers to develop a multipurpose system that could be applied to and should satisfy military requirements for demining operations as well as general civil purposes. The new development of this machine was oriented towards the following applications: demining operations; engineering works in civil protection; works in hazardous situations, ecological disasters, etc. Based on the mechanical solution of the universal loader, new additional demining equipment has been developed. The BOZENA demining system consists of the following functional parts (see Figure 4): universal vehicle for terrain manipulation, a soil loader, and a maneuvering vehicle; a radio communication system for teleoperation and remote control; two flailing mechanisms with rotating chains and hammers (these mechanisms can be manipulated in 2 d. o. f. according to working conditions); covers for mechanical protection against explosions of mines; as well as tracks and palettes for transport. Published by JMU Scholarly Commons,

9 Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 2, Iss. 2 [1998], Art. 2 Figure 4: Side and top view on the demining vehicle L1= 5282 mm, L2 = 2180 mm, W1 = 1985 mm, W2 = 2457 mm, D = 1300 mm, H1 = 150 mm. Description and Technical Specifications Some parameters and operating characteristics for the BOZENA system are listed below. Slope angle of the terrain where the unit is able to work: in lateral direction in transversal direction Speed of demining Width of demining area Depth of flailing hammers Maximum distance for remote control Time for preparing the vehicle for operation 10 degrees 20 degrees 0.7 up to 3 km/h 2 m 0.15 m 5 km 30 min. Experience from Real Demining Operations The BOZENA demining system (see Figure 5), which was verified under real conditions, is used by Slovak and Czech military peacekeeping forces in the former Yugoslavia for clearing post battle minefields. This demining system exhibits some important advantages over other existing demining techniques. These include speed of demining operations, low cost and high efficiency expressed as total cost per unit of 8

10 Havlík and Licko: Humanitarian Demining: The Challenge for Robotic Research cleared, lower psychological pressure for service persons because vehicle is controlled remotely, multipurpose use of system (loader and maneuvering unit can be combined with 18 additional accessories), as well as fast and low cost transport over long distances. Figure 4: "BOZENA" prepared for demining operations" Conclusion Detecting and neutralizing landmines are big challenges facing researchers working in several disciplines. Targeted research is especially desired in the following domains: Robotics. Such a robot should be an autonomous or semiautonomous vehicle that is easily transportable and cheap. It should be able to move along various terrain features (such as holes, slopes, and stones), negotiate possible obstacles (such as trees, weed coppice, wickets, and water), as well as resist mine explosions. To neutralize mines, it is equipped with one or several appropriate mine explosion activating systems. Sensing technology for mine detection. Detecting and localizing landmines has a crucial importance in demining operations. Considering the great number of types of mines produced (different forms, materials, and colors), the variety of terrain features, and the endless possibilities of hiding mines, reliable equipment should use more sensing techniques and fusing sensory information to detect mines. Naturally, this requires the elaboration of reliable recognition algorithms. Published by JMU Scholarly Commons,

11 Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 2, Iss. 2 [1998], Art. 2 Sensing, information processing, and communication for mobile systems. The recognition and information systems include several smart sensors needed for remote mobility control, obstacle avoidance, and navigation. Control. The remote operation of the mobility, sensorial, and mine destruction systems suggest a decentralized modular architecture of the control. Such a control system should be built taking outdoor working conditions, as well as the total cost of the demining system, into consideration. References [1] Proc. Workshop on Anti personnel Mine Detection and Removal (WAPM'95), June 30 July 1, 1995, Lausanne, Switzerland[back] [2] Proc. Int. Workshop on Sustainable Humanitarian Demining, Sept. 29 Oct. 1, 1997, Zagreb, Croatia[back] [3] Proc. Int. Symp. On Measurement and Control in Robotics (ISMCR), Brussels, May 9 11, 1996, Belgium[back] [4] Havlik,S.: A reconfigurable cable crane robot for large workspace operations. Proc. ISIR'93, Nov. 4 6, 1993, Tokyo, pp [back] [5] Havlik,S. and Knazek, J.: A cable suspended robotic manipulator. Concept, kinematic and control study. Pro. Int. Conf. On Measurement and Control in robotics. (ISMCR'95) Smolenuce, Slovakia [6] Peacetime mine clearance (Humanitarian demining), NATO Defence Res. Group, Doc. AC/243 D/1213, 1996[back] 10