What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts. ELToD Applications. SW 10 th Street. ELToD Future Enhancements

Similar documents
Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Expansion Projects Description

Civil Engineering and Environmental, Gadjah Mada University TRIP ASSIGNMENT. Introduction to Transportation Planning

P07033 US 50 EB Weaving Analysis between El Dorado Hills and Silva Valley Ramp Metering Analysis for US 50 EB On-Ramp at Latrobe Road

Fleet Penetration of Automated Vehicles: A Microsimulation Analysis

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

Toll Impact Study Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Traffic Signal Timing Diamond Operation. Innovation for better mobility

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

3.0 Future (2040) Transportation

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

Appendix F Model Development Report

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

CVO. Submitted to Kentucky Transportation Center University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky

FE Review-Transportation-II. D e p a r t m e n t o f C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g U n i v e r s i t y O f M e m p h i s

Appendix 3 Traffic Technical Memorandum

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Benefit Cost Analysis

Technical Feasibility Report

Wrong Way Driving - Statewide Initiative

AECOM 30 Leek Cres., 4 th Floor Richmond Hill, ON L4B 4N4 Canada

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Traffic Micro-Simulation Assisted Tunnel Ventilation System Design

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

CHAPTER 5 ESTIMATED TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GOLETA RAMP METERING STUDY MAY 8, 2018 FINAL REPORT

BACKGROUND. Dear Mr. Dietrich:

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Development of the Idaho Statewide Travel Demand Model Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data and Origin Destination Matrix Estimation

Freight Performance Measures Using Truck GPS Data and the Application of National Performance Measure Research Data Set (NPMRDS)

I-405 Corridor Master Plan

Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model Version 3.3 (GTCRPM3.3) Additional Enhancements Technical Report Draft

Project Working Group Meeting #5

The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011

final report Northwest Toll Expressway Value Pricing Program Pilot Study Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Roundabout Feasibility Study SR 44 at Grand Avenue TABLE OF CONTENTS

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Miami Dade's move to all-electronic cashless tolling Posted Wed, :27

APPENDICES C APPENDIX C: CALCULATION WORKSHEETS FOR FREEWAY SEGMENTS AND FREEWAY WEAVE ANALYSIS

Benefit-Cost Analysis Technical Memo

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Pembina Emerson Border Crossing Interim Measures Microsimulation

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Project Advisory Committee

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

National and Regional Electronic Toll Interoperability

Automated Bus Announcement Update Transportation Accessibility Advisory Committee January 6, 2016

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Reliability Guide for the HCM Concepts & Content

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Transportation Highway Engineering Conference February 24, 2015

MEMORANDUM FPN: State Road: 91 County: Osceola (92)

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

Bella Vista Bypass TABEL OF CONTENTS

Oregon DOT Slow-Speed Weigh-in-Motion (SWIM) Project: Analysis of Initial Weight Data

Metro Highway Program

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Automated Occupancy Detection October 2015 (Phase I) Demonstration Results Presented by Kathy McCune

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

DELICETO, LLC PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL

Department of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia. Nicolas Saunier

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management System Lessons Learned. June 2, 2014

Traffic Feasibility Study

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

HALTON REGION SUB-MODEL

Transcription:

June 16, 2017

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts ELToD Applications SW 10 th Street ELToD Future Enhancements 2

ELToD (Express Lanes Time of Day) Model is a traffic assignment model built to forecast traffic volume and toll rates for Express Lanes. Four-Step Model / Activity-Based Model Trip Generation Trip Distribution Subarea Corridor Trip Table & Network ELToD Model Mode Choice Express Lanes Traffic Assignment O General Purpose Lanes D 3

Traffic & Network Input O-D Traffic Matrix Hourly Distribution Highway Network & Geometry GP link data EL link data Other links data Assumed tolls Pricing Input Toll Pricing Policy Minimum/Maximum tolls Toll escalation Model Parameters Assignment input Volume-Delay input Akcelik BPR Choice Model Coefficients VTTS input Reliability input ELToD Equilibrium Assignment Optional Feedback to Travel Demand Model Output Data by Hour Volumes, toll rates, revenues Speeds, travel times V/C ratios Report Output Notes: Blue boxes are input from travel demand model Green boxes are other ELToD inputs Orange boxes are ELToD applications 4

Proven to Be Effective and Low-Cost Comprehensive Guidance on Applying to New Projects Open Source Allowing Total Transparency Ensures Consistency on Projects Evaluation Convenient for Peer Review and Quality Assurance Widely Used State of Practice Methodology 5

Why ELToD? - Modeler s View Advanced Embedded Binary Toll Choice Model Dynamic Toll Rates One-Hour Trip Tables Cube Software Platform Easy to Customize Detailed Log Files Short Run Time 6

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts ELToD Applications SW 10th Street ELToD Future Enhancements 7

Express Lane Choices in ELToD Express Lane Share Calculated for Each O-D X% of drivers use express lanes from A to B Binary Logit Model Binary choice between Express and GU lanes Share changes gradually as benefits/costs change Simple formula for share: Share = 1 1 + e ( U) where: U describes the benefits vs. costs 8

Binary Logit Toll Choice Model Express Lane Share = 1 1 + e ( 1 β Constant + β Time Time + β Toll Toll +β Reliability Reliability) Estimated Coefficients β Time (beta time) β Toll (beta toll) β Reliability (beta reliability) β Constant (beta constant) Model Generated Inputs Time Toll Reliability (None) 9

Choice Model Advantages Generalized Cost Method 0% or 100% of trips from A to B use tolled links Generally considers only toll and time Toll Choice Model Anywhere from 0% to 100% of trips from A to B use tolled links Considers driver heterogeneity Can capture unobserved factors More realistic toll sensitivity 10

Choice Model vs. Generalized Cost Method 100% Toll Share vs. Utility 75% 50% 25% 0% Toll Choice Model Gen Cost Approach -4-2 0 2 4 Utility ( U) 11

ELToD vs. Other Choice Models Other Choice Models May Consider Only Time and Toll ELToD Considers Reliability and Discomfort Scenario testing is fast (runtime is about 10 minutes) RGAP=0.0001 Not less than 30 iterations

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts ELToD Applications SW 10 th Street ELToD Future Enhancements 13

Traffic and Revenue Studies Express Lane Traffic Projected Toll Rates Sensitivity Testing Toll Policy, Value-of-Time Planning and PD&E Studies Ingress/Egress Location Analysis Express lane project traffic for operational analysis 14

SERPM (period model) Base & Future AADTs/Period Design Traffic Project Sub-Area Cube Analyst (Matrix Estimation) Period Trip Matrices Bluetooth OD Check/Adjustment Hourly Directional Distribution of traffic Other ELToD Model required input EL Toll Rate ELToD Model EL & GUL Traffic Speed & V/C Ratio Revenue Estimate Corridor DDHVs based on EL/GUL split

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts ELToD Applications SW 10 th Street ELToD Future Enhacements 16

Project Overview

SW 10 th Street Forecast Alternatives No-Build No Interchange (NBNI) No-Build (NB) Build

Build SW 10 th minus No-Build No-Interchange Traffic Increase Traffic Decrease

No-Build No-Interchange No-Build Build

Volume (vph) K Factor (EL AM) = 13.7% K Factor (GUL AM) = 7.8% Hour SW10th St. between Powerline Road and Military Trail

Sawgrass Expwy/Turnpike Options Option 1 Option 2 No direct connect No braided ramps Braided ramps Option 3 Direct connect Option 4 Direct connect + Braided ramps 22 Florida Department of Transportation

Sawgrass Expwy/Turnpike DDHVs Option 1 Option 2 1,670 7,000 1,670 7,000 1,000 Option 3 950 1,000 Option 4 950 6,200 6,200 460 720 280 720 23 Florida Department of Transportation

Sawgrass Expy/Turnpike Option 1 2040 Build HCS Analysis Segment LOS F Segment LOS F LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Weaving LOS F Weaving LOS F 24 Florida Department of Transportation

Sawgrass Expwy/Turnpike Option 2 2040 Build HCS Analysis Segment LOS F Segment LOS F LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Merge LOS E Weaving LOS F 25 Florida Department of Transportation

Sawgrass Expwy/Turnpike Option 3 2040 Build HCS Analysis Segment LOS E Segment LOS D Weaving LOS C LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Weaving LOS D 26 Florida Department of Transportation

Sawgrass Expwy/Turnpike Option 4 2040 Build HCS Analysis Segment LOS E Segment LOS D LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Merge LOS D Weaving LOS C 27 Florida Department of Transportation

Option Evaluation Summary Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 SB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS F. NB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS F. EB Sawgrass Expressway C-D Road to Turnpike LOS F. EB Sawgrass Expressway Mainline LOS F. Eliminate From Further Consideration SB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS F. NB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS F. EB Sawgrass Expressway C-D Road to Turnpike LOS F. EB Express Lane Egress braided ramp to C-D LOS E. Eliminate From Further Consideration SB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS E. NB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS D. EB Sawgrass Expressway C-D Road to Turnpike LOS C. Fewer destinations Proceed Further in PD&E Process SB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS E. NB Turnpike Mainline North of Sawgrass Expressway LOS D. EB Sawgrass Expressway C-D Road to Turnpike LOS C. Additional destination Low Demand w/braided ramp Eliminate From Further Consideration 28 Florida Department of Transportation

Complete multiple alternative scenarios in a short time More direct calculations of EL and GP design hour volumes than traditional approaches Minimizes post processing efforts Consistent assignment in controlled environment Design team can eliminate undesirable alternatives through comparison

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts ELToD Applications SW 10 th Street ELToD Future Enhancements 30

1. Model a network of express lanes Multiple express lane projects Include regular toll roads and arterials 2. Improve multiple segment modeling 3. Maintain reasonable run times 4. Include Dynamic Traffic Assignment 5. Improve Toll Rate Calculations 31

D 1. Origin-destination pairs are not strictly required to use the express or general purpose lanes. 2. Arterial-only paths are possible. O 32

What is Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA)? What are the advantages of DTA? Static (ELToD 2.0) Dynamic (ELToD 3.0) Driver decision before trip. Driver decision during trip. Smallest Time Interval = 1 hour. Smaller Time Interval = 15 minutes. Not designed for modeling static toll roads and express lanes together. Designed for modeling both static toll roads and express lanes. 33

Base Year: 2010 Network Future Year: 2040 Network I-95 Phase 1 I-95 Phase 1,2,3 Turnpike Mainline I-595 Express HEFT Sawgrass I-75 Express 826 Palmetto Express 1 43 34

Questions? 35