Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis
|
|
- Noreen Regina Griffith
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis Along IH 27 at Plainview, TX Hao Xu, Jared A. Squyres, Wesley Kumfer, and Hongchao Liu 7/15/2011
2 Table of Contents Project Description... 2 Data... 2 Methodology and Approach... 2 Study Results... 8 Summary Reference
3 Project Description As part of the Plainview IH 27 project involving the conversion of two way frontage roads into one way frontage roads, TxDOT will be adding additional ramps to facilitate movement on and off the main lanes of IH 27. As part of the Interstate Justification reporting requirements, a level of service/weaving analysis is required to determine the impacts to the free flow of traffic along the main lanes. This project models the traffic flow and conducts weaving and ramp junction analysis along the main lanes of I 27 between FM 3466 to SH 194. In this study, the interchange of IH 27 and U.S. Hwy 70 was also simulated to analyze the effect of the proposed one way frontage road and interchange configuration compared to existing ones with three groups of traffic volumes: existing, projected 2015, and projected Data The data used in the study was provided by TxDOT and supplemented by data collected during site visits to the interchange. Traffic counts (volumes, speeds, and classes) with 15 minute intervals along main lanes of the studied IH 27 segment were collected for this project, and traffic volumes and signal timing plans at IH 27 and U.S. Hwy 70 were reused from an earlier task of the Plainview I 27 project [1]. Projected daily traffic volumes for 2015 and 2035 were provided by TxDOT, along with the preliminary geometric schematic plan view. Methodology and Approach Weaving is defined as the crossing of two or more traffic streams traveling in the same general direction along a significant length of highway without the aid of traffic control devices (with the exception of guide signs). When an on ramp is closely followed by an off ramp and the two are joined by an auxiliary lane, they form a weaving segment. If a one lane on ramp is closely followed by a one lane off ramp and the two are not connected by an auxiliary lane, the merge and diverge movements are considered separately using procedures for the analysis of ramp junctions [2]. Impacts of the proposed and existing ramps to the traffic along the main lanes are caused by weaving, merging, and diverging movements at junctions of the freeway and ramps. Therefore, this study analyzed each junction by using a weaving or ramp junction analysis procedure as necessary. The proposed on ramp, the existing off ramp, and the proposed auxiliary lane along IH 27 northbound between FM 3466 and US 70 comprise a weaving segment. The other ramps (one proposed on ramp, two existing on ramps, two proposed off ramps, and two existing off ramps) in the studied segment were analyzed as isolated ramp junctions. The tool used to analyze the weaving segment and ramp junctions in this project was HCS HCS 2000 implements the procedures defined in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM 2
4 2000), including commonly used analysis methods for freeway weaving segments and ramp junctions [2]. The methodological process used to construct the weaving and ramp junction analysis was performed in the following steps: 1. The traffic volume data along IH 27 collected by TxDOT for this project were processed. The peak 15 minute traffic volume, the peak hour volume, and the Peak Hour Factor () at each traffic count location were calculated. Peak hour and peak 15 minute times at each traffic count location are different from times at other traffic count locations, so peak hour and peak 15 minute volumes were used without considering the times. The processed data is shown in Table 1 and the peak hour volumes are also shown in Figure 1 Figure The projected peak hour volumes for 2015 and 2035 were calculated by multiplying projected daily volumes by 10%, as indicated by various references. 3. The required input data were collected, and values at the studied weaving segment and isolated ramp junctions for 2011, 2015, and 2035 were estimated separately, as shown in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. The required data and values were input into HCS 2000 to generate analysis results. The IH 27 and US 70 interchange was modeled and simulated using Synchro and SimTraffic. The Synchro models for the existing two way frontage roads and interchange configurations were reused from the former task of the Plainview IH 27 project [1]. Models for the proposed frontage roads and interchange configuration were developed in this study. Current traffic volumes, projected 2015 traffic volumes, and projected 2035 traffic volumes at this interchange were applied to the two configurations: the existing one and the proposed one. Simulation results were generated by SimTraffic and delay values were compared to illustrate the effect of the proposed configuration. 3
5 Table 1: PROCESSED TRAFFIC DATA OF MAIN LANES PEAK 15 MINUTE PEAK 15 MINUTE PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR MAIN LANE PEAK MAIN LANE PEAK LOCATION MAIN LANE RAW FILE NAME TIME TIME 15 MINUTE HOUR IH 27 NB DL MP :30 PM 90 6:15 PM A 1538V rdf' IH 27 NB PL MP :30 AM 46 9:00 AM A 1541V rdf' IH 27 NB DL MP :30 PM 94 5:30 PM 329 '0164A 1540V rdf' IH 27 NB PL MP :45 AM 46 9:00 AM 78 '0164A 1147V rdf' IH 27 NB DL MP :45 PM 63 3:30 PM 218 '0164A 1151V rdf' IH 27 NB PL MP :45 AM 22 4:15 PM 47 '0164A 1537V rdf' IH 27 NB DL MP :00 PM 83 3:00 PM 317 '0164A 1151V rdf' IH 27 NB PL MP :00 AM 41 9:00 AM 86 '0164A 1149V rdf' IH 27 NB DL MP :45 PM 98 3:30 PM 328 '0164A 1119V rdf' IH 27 NB PL MP :00 AM 42 9:00 AM 76 '0164A 1145V rdf' IH 27 NB DL MP :45 PM 76 3:00 PM A 1119V rdf' IH 27 NB PL MP :00 AM 35 2:30 PM 67 '0164A 1536V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :45 PM 91 3:30 PM A 1536V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :45 PM 54 3:45 PM 106 '0164A 1151V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :45 PM 91 3:30 PM 304 '0164A 1117V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :00 AM 39 1:30 PM 95 '0164A 1145V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :45 PM 89 3:00 PM 298 '0164A 1541V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :45 PM 37 1:30 PM 95 '0164A 1144V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :45 PM 84 3:30 PM 289 '0164A 1119V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :45 PM 39 4:00 PM 118 '0164A 1540V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :45 PM 54 3:30 PM 198 '0164A 1537V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :00 PM 35 4:15 PM 92 '0164A 1539V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :45 PM 91 3:00 PM A 1149V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :30 PM 40 4:15 PM 105 '0164A 1538V rdf' IH 27 SB DL MP :00 PM 81 12:45 PM 287 '0164A 1118V rdf' IH 27 SB PL MP :30 PM 34 4:15 PM 107 '0164A 1147V rdf' 4
6 Figure 1 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR IN MAIN LANES AND RAMPS 2011 (1) Figure 2 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR IN MAIN LANES AND RAMPS 2011 (2) 5
7 Figure 3 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR IN MAIN LANES AND RAMPS 2011 (3) Table 2: REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR THE WEAVING SECTION AND RAMP JUNCTIONS (2011) DIRECTION/SEGMENT RAMP TYPE RAMP NUMBER IN THE PLAN VIEW LANES RAMP LENGTH OF ACCELERATION LANES /DECELERATION LANE FFS RAMP FFS RAMP LENGTH OF ANALYSIS PERIOD RAMP RAMP PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES OF HEAVY VEHICLES NB/NORTH OF US70 EXISTING ON RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 303 VPH 101 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% NB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 EXISTING OFF RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 404 VPH 49 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 EXISTING ON RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 463 VPH 80 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/SOUTH OF 24TH STREET PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 543 VPH 40 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/NORTH OF US70 PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 503 VPH 59 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 444 VPH 20 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 PROPOSED ON RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 424 VPH 80 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR WEAVING ANALYSIS 2011 DIRECTION/SEGMENT RAMP NUMBER IN NUMBER LENGTH OF WEAVING TYPE THE PLAN VIEW OF LANES WEAVING SEGMENT LENGTH FFS TERRAIN ANALYSIS PERIOD A C B D NB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 TYPE A RAMP 1 & RAMP FEET 70 MPH LEVEL 1 HOUR 265 VPH 0 VPH 142 VPH 38 VPH A C B D A C B D 6
8 Table 3: REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR THE WEAVING SECTION AND RAMP JUNCTIONS (2015) DIRECTION/SEGMENT RAMP TYPE RAMP NUMBER IN THE PLAN VIEW LANES REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR RAMP JUNCTION ANALYSIS 2015 RAMP LENGTH OF ACCELERATION LANES /DECELERATION LANE FFS Table 4: REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR THE WEAVING SECTION AND RAMP JUNCTIONS (2035) RAMP FFS RAMP LENGTH OF ANALYSIS PERIOD RAMP RAMP PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES OF HEAVY VEHICLES NB/NORTH OF US70 EXISTING ON RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 360 VPH 200 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% NB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 EXISTING OFF RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 560 VPH 220 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 EXISTING ON RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 240 VPH 270 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/SOUTH OF 24TH STREET PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 510 VPH 130 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/NORTH OF US70 PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 380 VPH 120 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 260 VPH 40 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 PROPOSED ON RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 320 VPH 270 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR WEAVING ANALYSIS 2015 DIRECTION/SEGMENT RAMP NUMBER IN NUMBER LENGTH OF WEAVING TYPE THE PLAN VIEW OF LANES WEAVING SEGMENT LENGTH FFS TERRAIN ANALYSIS PERIOD A C B D NB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 TYPE A RAMP 1 & RAMP FEET 70 MPH LEVEL 1 HOUR 240 VPH 0 VPH 250 VPH 120 VPH A C B D A C B D DIRECTION/SEGMENT RAMP TYPE RAMP NUMBER IN THE PLAN VIEW LANES REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR RAMP JUNCTION ANALYSIS 2035 RAMP LENGTH OF ACCELERATION LANES /DECELERATION LANE FFS RAMP FFS RAMP LENGTH OF ANALYSIS PERIOD RAMP RAMP PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES OF HEAVY VEHICLES NB/NORTH OF US70 EXISTING ON RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 500 VPH 280 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% NB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 EXISTING OFF RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 780 VPH 310 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 EXISTING ON RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 330 VPH 380 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/SOUTH OF 24TH STREET PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 710 VPH 180 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/NORTH OF US70 PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 530 VPH 160 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 PROPOSED OFF RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 370 VPH 50 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 PROPOSED ON RAMP RAMP FT 70 MPH 35 MPH 350 VPH 380 VPH 1 HOUR % 8% REQUIRED INPUT DATA AND VALUES FOR WEAVING ANALYSIS 2035 DIRECTION/SEGMENT RAMP NUMBER IN NUMBER LENGTH OF WEAVING TYPE THE PLAN VIEW OF LANES WEAVING SEGMENT LENGTH FFS TERRAIN ANALYSIS PERIOD A C B D NB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 TYPE A RAMP 1 & RAMP FEET 70 MPH LEVEL 1 HOUR 350 VPH 0 VPH 340 VPH 150 VPH A C B D A C B D 7
9 Study Results The weaving segment of IH 27 northbound between FM 3466 and US 70 was analyzed by using the weaving analysis tool in HCS The results are shown in Table 5. As shown in the table, speed is likely to decrease as density through this area increases. Table 5: ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR THE WEAVING SEGMENT YEAR 2011 YEAR 2015 YEAR 2035 WEAVING SEGMENT SPEED (mi/h) WEAVING SPEED (mi/h) NON WEAVING SPEED (mi/h) WEAVING SEGMENT DENSITY (pc/mi/ln) LEVEL OF SERVICE, LOS A A A CAPACITY AS A 15 MINUTE FLOW RATE (veh/h) CAPACITY AS A FULL HOUR (veh/h) Terminology included in this table includes: WEAVING SEGMENT SPEED: space mean speed of all vehicles in the weaving segment WEAVING SPEED: space mean speed of weaving vehicles in the weaving segment NON WEAVING SPEED: space mean speed of non weaving vehicles in the weaving segment LEVEL OF SERVICE: Levels of service in weaving segments are defined in terms of density for all cases of stable operation. The LOS criteria was is in Table 6 CAPACITY AS A 15 MINUTE FLOW RATE: capacity under prevailing conditions stated as a flow rate for the peak 15 min of the hour CAPACITY AS A FULL HOUR : capacity under prevailing conditions expressed as an hourly volume Table 6: LOS CRITERIA FOR WEAVING SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE, LOS A B C D E F WEAVING SEGMENT DENSITY (pc/mil/ln) <= >27.0 Isolated ramp junctions were analyzed by using the ramp analysis tool in HCS Analysis results are shown in Table 7: 8
10 Table 7: ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR RAMP JUNCTIONS RAMP DESCRIPTION NB/NORTH OF US70 NB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 SB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 SB/SOUTH OF 24TH STREET SB/NORTH OF US70 SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 DENSITY IN THE MERGING INFLUENCE AREA (pc/mil/ln) LEVEL OF SERVICE, LOS A A A A A A A SPACE MEAN SPEED OF VEHICLES WITHIN RAMP INFLUENCE AREA (mil/h) YEAR 2015 RAMP DESCRIPTION NB/NORTH OF US70 NB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 SB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 SB/SOUTH OF 24TH STREET SB/NORTH OF US70 SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 DENSITY IN THE MERGING INFLUENCE AREA (pc/mil/ln) LEVEL OF SERVICE, LOS A A A A A A A SPACE MEAN SPEED OF VEHICLES WITHIN RAMP INFLUENCE AREA (mil/h) YEAR 2035 RAMP DESCRIPTION NB/NORTH OF US70 NB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 SB/BETWEEN 24TH ST AND SH194 SB/SOUTH OF 24TH STREET SB/NORTH OF US70 SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 SB/BETWEEN FM3466 AND US 70 DENSITY IN THE MERGING INFLUENCE AREA (pc/mil/ln) LEVEL OF SERVICE, LOS A A A A A A A SPACE MEAN SPEED OF VEHICLES WITHIN RAMP INFLUENCE AREA (mil/h) YEAR
11 Delay values simulated for the IH 27 and US 70 interchange are shown in Table 8. A comparison of simulation results for the two configurations, the existing one and the proposed one, is shown in Table 9. Table 8: DELAY VALUES SIMULATED FOR IH 27 AND US 70 Movements / (Delay/veh (s)) ID # ConfigDate Scenario EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM West Intersection (US 70 and I 27) 6 East Intersection (US 70 and I 27) Current Future Current Future
12 Table 9: RESULTS COMPARISON FOR THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED INTERCHANGE CONFIGURATION (Future Delay Current Delay) Movements / (Delay/veh (s)) ID # Date Scenario EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM AM Noon PM West 6 East Summary The weaving and ramp junction analyses presented in this report illustrate that the proposed additional ramps in the study area have a slight impact on the free flow of traffic along the main lanes. The Level of service in each ramp junction (or weaving segment) influence area is Level A, even with the highest projected 2035 traffic volume. Vehicle speeds in the influence areas will be a little bit lower than the free flow speeds, but this will not affect the fluidity of the traffic flow in the main lanes. Simulation results of the IH 27 and US 70 interchange showed that the new frontage road and interchange configurations will greatly reduce delay at the interchange, which is often congested severely because of the business area on the northwest of the interchange. Therefore, the research team recommends that these new configurations be adopted to improve traffic conditions on IH 27. Reference 1. Hongchao Liu, Hao Xu, and Rhett Dollins, Congestion Mitigation at IH 27 and U.S. Hwy 70 in Plainview, TX. Lubbock, TX. April, Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual TRB. Washington, D.C.,
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT US 460 Bypass Interchange and Southgate Drive Relocation State Project No.: 0460-150-204, P101, R201, C501, B601; UPC 99425
Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation
Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation \ AECOM 71 W. 23 rd Street New York, NY 10010 www.aecom.com 212 366 6200 tel 212 366 6214 fax Memorandum To CC Subject Robert Conway Donald Tone Construction
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES
Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC
MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road
MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February
Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th
Ref. No. 151-00564 Task 3 April 28, 2015 Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th 3480 Joseph Howe Drive, 5 Floor HALIFAX NS B3L 4H7 Sent via Email to ceasr.saleh@wmfares.com
One Harbor Point Residential
Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE
MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (95)823-85 Fax: (95) 823-853 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: FROM: File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah
P07033 US 50 EB Weaving Analysis between El Dorado Hills and Silva Valley Ramp Metering Analysis for US 50 EB On-Ramp at Latrobe Road
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 250 428 J Street, Suite 500 Oakland, CA 94612 Sacramento, CA 95814 510.839.1742 916.266.2190 510.839.0871 fax 916.266.2195 Dowling Associates, Inc. www.dowlinginc.com traffic@dowlinginc.com
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37
Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1
Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM
Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report
Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current
APPENDICES C APPENDIX C: CALCULATION WORKSHEETS FOR FREEWAY SEGMENTS AND FREEWAY WEAVE ANALYSIS
APPENDICES C APPENDIX C: CALCULATION WORKSHEETS FOR FREEWAY SEGMENTS AND FREEWAY WEAVE ANALYSIS Public Review Draft Existing Conditions Report Page C-1 October 2015 SIA PLAN UPDATE This page was intentionally
Interchange Operations Study MOT (I-75 & Austin Boulevard) ODOT District 7 PID 99213
Interchange Operations Study MOT-75-0.76 (I-75 & Austin Boulevard) ODOT District 7 PID 99213 Table of Contents MOT-75-0.76 Interchange Operations Study (IOS) 1.0 Project Summary... 2 2.0 Study Area...
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
Traffic Impact Analysis Update
Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Interstate 80 Corridor Study
Interstate 80 Corridor Study Final Technical Memorandum 5: Traffic Volumes, Accident Locations and Operational Deficiencies West Verdi (SR 425) Interchange to West McCarran Boulevard (SR 651) and East
Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results
NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2025 Simulation Results
APPENDIX G. Traffic Data
APPENDIX G Traffic Data HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Duanesburg Road & I-88 Ramps 10/7/2004 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department
Traffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795
Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis
JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments
JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments HCM Applications What is a Freeway? divided highway with full control of access two or more lanes for the exclusive use of traffic in each direction no signalized or stop-controlled
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...
KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266
KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721
BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM
BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE 303.572.0200 On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna
Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output
NDSU Dept #2880 PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Tel 701-231-8058 Fax 701-231-6265 www.ugpti.org www.atacenter.org Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area 2015 Simulation Output Technical
Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:
6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared
April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435
Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435 Re: Trip Generation Comparison West Hills Townhomes Keystone, Colorado FHU Reference No. 116388-01 Dear Mr. Shutler:
Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Route 4 (Farmington Avenue) Farmington, Connecticut Prepared for: The Town of Farmington, CT Prepared By: BL Companies Meriden, Connecticut December 2016
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433
Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic
To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015
Memo To: From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON : 165620021 Date: Reference: E.C. Row Expressway, Dominion Boulevard Interchange, Dougall Avenue Interchange, and Howard 1. Review of Interchange Geometry
Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis
Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,
Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;
December 19, 2013 File: 163600935 Attention: Troy Elliott Carl Elliott Limited 15-1831 Robertson Road PO Box 11117 Nepean, Ontario K1H 7T8 Dear Mr. Elliott, Reference: 2235 and 2265 Robertson Road Transportation
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009
6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) 116 20 8 405 137 56 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow
Interchange Operations Study
CUY 480 14.32 PID No. 102053 Ohio Department of Transportation District 12 550 Transportation Boulevard Garfield Heights, OH 44125 5396 Interchange Operations Study Analysis Summary August 2016 8101 N.
Appendix B: Traffic Reports
Appendix B: Traffic Reports 407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION Report Markham Road Station Traffic Study Prepared for Ministry of Transportation, Ontario
Proposed Pit Development
July 5, 2017 via email: sam@greenwoodconst.ca CCTA File 114239 Sam Greenwood Greenwood Aggregates 205467 County Road 109 Amaranth, ON L9W 0V1 Re: Proposed Violet Hill Gravel Pit, Town of Mono Traffic Review
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description (Used for surface streets,
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
CENTRAL VIRGINIA LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Appendix F
Data Collection Traffic turning movement data were obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Southwestern Region Lynchburg District Traffic Engineering Section. However, 12-hour traffic
June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,
10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018
2.1.5 Traffic and Circulation. Table Level of Service Criteria for Highway Segment Regulatory Setting Affected Environment
2.1.5 Traffic and Circulation This section addresses the potential impacts to traffic and circulation associated with construction and long-term operation of the proposed project. The traffic and circulation
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:
Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 98 Frontage Road Off-Ramp. Cherokee County, SC
Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 98 Frontage Road Off-Ramp Cherokee County, SC Prepared for: South Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by: Stantec Consulting
Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B
Memorandum DATE: AUGUST 1, 2013 TO: PAUL TILTON, P.E., SANDWICH DPW DIRECTOR/TOWN ENGINEER FROM: LEV MALAKHOFF, SR. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER RE: ROUTE 130/QUAKER MEETINGHOUSE ROAD INTERSECTION Paul: Per
Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee
To Copies James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee Date August 26, 2016 Reference number 243381 From Mike Iswalt, Vanessa Peers, Will Baumgardner File reference 4-05 Subject Lafayette
ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
Date: December 20, Project #:
To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long
D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14
CastleGlenn Consultants Inc.
CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. Engineers, Project Managers & Planners March 11 th, 2013 Domenic Idone, P. Eng Planning Manager R.W. Tomlinson Ltd. 5597 Power Road Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3N4 Dear Mr. Idone:
APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets
APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED
RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic Impact Study
19 May 2015 BY EMAIL: asaggarwal@gmail.com Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, ON K1K 0R8 Attention: Mr. Anand Aggarwal RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic
Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering
Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC
Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 16 E. Cherokee Street Cherokee County, SC Prepared for: South Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by: Stantec Consulting
Lakeside Terrace Development
Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.
APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report
APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.
Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS
Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion
Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief
Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald
Parking/Traffic Assessment Study
Brock Road Industrial Mall 985 Brock Road South City of Pickering Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Prepared by: Tranplan Associates, Toronto Toronto 416-670-2005 Sudbury 705-522-0272 Peterborough 705-874-3638
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800
Technical Feasibility Report
Prepared For: Bow Concord I-93 Improvements Project Bow and Concord, NH Prepared By: 53 Regional Drive Concord, NH 03301 NHDOT Project # 13742 Federal Project #T-A000(018) September 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West
Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)
Market Street Road Diet Wilmington, NC 2016 Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Wilmington, NC Parsons Brinckerhoff January 2016 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT US 17 Corridor
Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers
Traffic Impact Study For Eastern Springs A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY April 2018 Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Table of Contents 1) Executive Summary... 2 2) Study Purpose...
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
HONDA DEALERSHIP LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA. Prepared by:
LOS ANGELES 21 S. Figueroa St, Suite 24 Los Angeles, CA 912 213.337.368 Fax :213.337.3679 ONTARIO 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 25 Ontario, CA 91764 99.481.575 Fax :99.481.5757 SAN DIEGO 6 B St, Suite
Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership
1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com February 25, 2013 OUR REF: TO3098TOE Mark Motors of Ottawa 611 Montreal Road Ottawa, ON K1K 0T8 Attention:
MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D
MEMORANDUM Date: To: Liz Diamond, Dokken Engineering From: Subject: Dave Stanek, Fehr & Peers Western Placerville Interchanges 2045 Analysis RS08-2639 Fehr & Peers has completed a transportation analysis
County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT
Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main
MEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012
BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Tel. (617) 973-7100 Fax (617) 973-8855 TTY (617) 973-7089 www.bostonmpo.org
Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview
1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com March 28, 2012 OUR REF: TO3088TOY Barry J. Hobin & Architects 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, ON K1S 3K7
JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3
March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING
Transportation & Traffic Engineering
Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,
1 st Street Intersection Study
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1 st Street Intersection Study Prepared for: City of Independence In Cooperation With: Iowa Department of Transportation & Iowa Department of Public Safety Governor
APPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)
APPENDICES Appendix T No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley
April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief
April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.