Complete Fractionation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Newly Developed EPH SPE Cartridges

Similar documents
Method-Specific Sample Preparation for EPH Analysis

State of Texas UST Monitoring visit us online at The latest TNRCC 1005/1006 UST methods used by Texas.

TEKLAB, INC ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT. CLIENT: Kelron Environmental Work Order: Project: CHMGP/ Page 1 of 6.

Large Volume Injection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

State of Alaska UST Monitoring

LUFT/LUST Petroleum Standards State Methods

Underground Storage Tanks Compliance Monitoring with Restek Analytical Reference Materials

Determination of PAH Compounds from Aqueous Samples Using a Non-Halogenated Extraction Solvent and Atlantic C18 Disks

Emissions Characteristics of Volatile and Semi-volatile Organic Compounds and Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Hot and Warm Mix Asphalts

Analysis of Petroleum Fractions by ASTM D2887

Proof of Long-Term, Leak-Free Performance for a Novel Self-tightening GC Column Nut

ASTM D2887 Simulated Distillation Calibration Mixture Analysis Using a Differential Acceleration Column

Hydrocarbon standards for GC analysis 2016

New Integrated GC Guard Columns for Built-In Protection

ANALYSIS OF GASOLINE RANGE HYDROCARBONS ON BP1-PONA

Hydrocarbon Analysis using Sitelab UVF for DENR UST Program

CONSTITUTION OF COAL TAR PITCH AND ITS EFFECT ON PROPERTIES

Characterization and Source Identification of an Unknown Spilled Oil Using Fingerprinting Techniques by GC MS and GC FID

Application Note. Abstract. Authors. Environmental Analysis

Heavy Fuel Oil 6303 (2002)

Fausto Munari e Andrea Cadoppi ThermoFisher - Italy

High Throughput Mineral Oil Analysis (Hydrocarbon Oil Index) by GC-FID Using the Agilent Low Thermal Mass (LTM) System

Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Diesel Fuel Dilution for In-Service Motor Oil Using ASTM Method D7593

Underground Storage Tank Monitoring State Of California visit us online at

New Developments in Ionic Liquid GC Stationary Phases

Applicant: GUANGDONG XIN YU TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL Date: Mar 21, 2018 CO.,LTD. LAI MEI INDUSTRIAL ZONE, CHENGHAI DISTRICT, SHAN TOU, GUANGDONG, CHINA

PAH and Nitro-PAH emissions from GDI vehicles

Table C 15. TAC Emissions Summary and Ambient Air Impact Concentrations. FCA Mack Avenue Assembly Plant Update February 2019

Oxygenates in Fuels Analysis Solutions From Trace Levels to Ethanol Fuels

Test Report. Final conclusion: PASS SHA18. Gohandmade Dsign International A/S HANNE Madevej Aabenraa DENMARK

EPA Method 625: Determination of Bases, Neutrals and Acids by Solid Phase Extraction and GC/MS Detection

Supporting Information for. Diesel Particle Filter and Fuel Effects on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Emissions

Fast GC. Dial for e-seminar Audio. Slide 4 SPEEDY GC

5 PHASE GC COLUMNS DISCOVER NEW OPTIONS. Phenomenex I Web:

Evaluation report. tests of material samples for the parameters heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn, Hg) LVHH, BTEX, PDH, PAH and EOX

ZB-5ms GC Columns. Aromatic Compounds

ASTM D 6730 Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis

Method Development for Capillary GC Systems. Slide 1

Agilent 9000 Intuvo GC Applications. Matthew Giardina, Ph.D. James McCurry, Ph.D. Rebecca Veeneman, Ph. D.

Bio-Aquatic Testing 2501 Mayes Rd Suite 100 Carrollton, TX (972)

EPA 625: Base, Neutral, Acid Semivolatiles in Municipal and Industrial Waste Water by Solid Phase Extraction

Meeting the Requirements of EN12916:2006 (IP391/07) Using Agilent 1200 Series HPLC Systems

The Analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Hazel Davidson Technical Marketing Manager Derwentside Environmental Testing Services

Group-Type Analysis (PiPNA) in Diesel and Jet Fuel by Flow Modulated GCxGC FID.

Using a New Gas Phase Micro-Fluidic Deans Switch for the 2-D GC Analysis of Trace Methanol in Crude Oil by ASTM Method D7059 Application

Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis Featuring Rtx -1 PONA Columns

炭化水素 - 直鎖炭化水素 炭化水素 - 炭化水素及びアルコール類

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Energy & Chemicals - Petrochemicals. Edgar Naegele, Agilent Technologies, Inc. Waldbronn, Germany

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY: INJECTION TECHNIQUES CAPILLARY COLUMNS

REFINED RESTEK. Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis. innovative petrochemical solutions. Featuring Rtx -DHA Columns

Beverage Grade Carbon Dioxide

Characterization of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Post-Burn Crude Oil-Spilled Soils, Gokana, Rivers State, Nigeria

Improving NAPL Site Investigations using UVF and LIF Technologies Together Image courtesy of Dakota Technologies, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

GC Inlets. An Overview. Simon Jones GC Applications Engineer

AppNote 6/2006. Ultra-Fast Determination of the Hydrocarbon Oil Index by Gas Chromatography using a Modular Accelerated Column Heater (MACH) KEYWORDS

Method Detection Limits for EPA Method 8015 Diesel Range Organics using Fully Automated Extraction and Concentration

APPLICATION OF SOLID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION (SPME) IN PROFILING HYDROCARBONS IN OIL SPILL CASES

Impact of GC Parameters on The Separation Part 2: Choice of Column Internal Diameter

Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions Comparison for Three Tier II Non-Road Diesel Engines Operating on Ethanol- Diesel Blends

From Helium to Hydrogen: GC-MS Case Study on SVOCs in Water

Rapid Qualitative GC-TOFMS Analysis of a Petroleum Refinery Reformate Standard

Detection of Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas According to ASTM D5504 with an Agilent Dual Plasma Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector

Techniques for Improving the Reproducibility of GC Analysis

Evaluation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon in Soil Using LC with Fraction Collector and GC/MS

New Technology for Environmental Assays Improve Resolution, Run More Samples at Lower Cost

Sulfur Detection at ppb Levels in Light Hydrocarbon Streams

Agilent Multimode Inlet for Gas Chromatography

Agilent and ASTM. Update on Recent Activities. Page 1

Proposed Sydport Container Terminal-Sydney Harbour Sediment Quality Analysis

Using the PSD for Backflushing on the Agilent 8890 GC System

C2, C3, C4 Monomer Analysis

On-Road Emission Rates of PAH and n-alkane Compounds from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles

Methanol in Biodiesel by EN14110 with the HT3 and Versa Automated Headspace Analyzers. Versa HT3. Application Note. Abstract.

High Temperature Simulated Distillation Performance Using the Agilent 8890 Gas Chromatograph

Restek Corporation 110 Benner Circle, Bellefonte, Pa Barry L. Burger, Neil Johansen, Valerie Gamble, Donald Rhoades

Analysis and Chromatographic Separation of Oxygenates in Hydrocarbon Matrices

Achieving Higher Sensitivities Using GC-FID with the Agilent Multimode Inlet (MMI)

Diffusion Results for Rigid Porous Polyethylene Samplers

XLB. 1-MS Accent. 5-MS Accent. MACHEREY-NAGEL

Page 1. Alternate Carrier Gas Considerations and Faster GC Analysis

Journal of Environmental Monitoring

GC Best Practices & Troubleshooting. Group/Presentation Title Agilent Restricted Month ##, 200X

Silica Gel Cleanup of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Do you know what you are removing?

Analysis of Oxygenated Compounds in Hydrotreated Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil Distillate Fractions

Operation and Applications of Differential Flow Modulation

The next level of True Blue Performance

Chromatography Guide for

6890 CHECKOUT PROCEDURE TCD (THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY) DETECTOR

Geochemical de-risking in Arctic Regions: Identifying Hydrocarbon Phase Before Drilling. Finding Petroleum: Exploring the Arctic 11 th October 2011

Same Column and Gas Type Try Different/Faster Velocities. Same Column, Switch He to H2 Carrier Then Try Faster Velocities

GC/MS Analysis of Trace Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) in Jet Fuel Using Energy Institute Method IP585

Chromatography Guide for

evaluation of automotive polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions

Optimizing Ultra Fast Simulated Distillation with a Low Thermal Mass (LTM) GC System. Jim McCurry Roger Firor Agilent Technologies Wilmington, DE

Agilent Solutions for the Analysis of Ethanol- Based Fuels Derived From Biomass. James D. McCurry, Ph.D. Senior Scientist

Meeting the Requirements of ASTM D ( IP548/06 ) with Agilent 1200 LC Systems

Alternative Carrier Gases for ASTM D7213 Simulated Distillation Analysis

Forensic Fingerprinting Petroleum Contaminants using UVF Field Screening Technology

A new method for assessing worker exposure to diesel-based drilling fluids.

Transcription:

Complete Fractionation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Newly Developed EPH SPE Cartridges Alexandria Pavkovich Jason Thomas Trent Sprenkle

Outline Background EPA Method Requirements Background and Recovery PAHs in Used Motor Oil

What is EPH? Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Means to separate Aliphatic and Aromatic compounds Clean up step for environmental samples Typical cartridge format for MA and NJ methods: 5g irregular silica gel fritted in 25 ml syringe tube

Importance of EPH: Multiple states follow EPH Methods MA, NJDEP, Texas, WA, Atlantic RBCA Used to assess impact of environmental samples Separates target aliphatic components from target aromatic components Allows separation of EPA priority 16 PAHs Higher proportion of aromatics have more hazardous designation relative to samples consisting of primarily aliphatic hydrocarbons

How does a EPH cartridge work? Normal Phase Dried Silica Gel (Activated) is Polar Non-polar compounds will elute first Hexane pulls off non-polar aliphatic compounds Dichloromethane pulls off more polar aromatic compounds Compared to Hexane, DCM is moderately polar

EPH Method Requirements: MA EPH Method 40 140% Recovery for Analytes and Surrogates < 5% Breakthrough for Naphthalene and 2- Methylnaphthalene NJ EPH Method Based off MA EPH Method Requires monitoring of additional analytes Texas EPH Method Uses Pentane instead of Hexane 60 140% Recovery for Analytes, 70 130% Recovery for Surrogates < 10 20% Crossover

Extractable Background < 30 ng of background contamination on-column Aliphatic Fraction 1-Chlorooctadecane @ 5ppm 8.2 ppm 11.5 ppm 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 min Aromatic Fraction o-terphenyl @ 5ppm 14.2 ppm 13.1 ppm 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 min ng on-column = ppm

Analyte Separation Aliphatic Aromatic

Recovery MA and NJDEP EPH Cartridge: Resprep EPH Fractionation SPE Cartridge Restek Cat # 25859 Reference Standards: MA Fractionation Surrogate Spike Mix Restek Cat # 31480 MA Surrogate Spike Mix Restek Cat # 31479 NJDEP Aliphatic Calibration Standard Restek Cat # 30544 NJDEP Aromatic Calibration Standard Restek Cat # 30545 Naphthalene Standard Restek Cat # 31280 2-Methylnaphthalene Standard Restek Cat # 31285

Recovery MA and NJDEP Sample Preparation: Condition Cartridge with 15 ml Hexane Addition of 1 ml of Sample Elute with 19 ml of Hexane (Aliphatic Fraction), followed by 20 ml of dichloromethane (Aromatic Fraction) Concentration to a final volume of 1 ml Analysis: Agilent 7890 GC-FID Column: Rxi-5Sil MS 30m x 0.32mm x 0.25µm Restek Cat # 13624 Oven Program: 40 C (1.5 min.) 300 C @12 C/min 350 C (7 min.) @ 6 C/min Injection temperature: 300 C; Injection volume: 1.0 μl, Carrier: Helium, constant flow @ 3 ml/min. Injection mode: splitless, purge flow: 50 ml/min. @ 1min. Detector Temp: 350 C

Recovery MA and NJDEP Average of 3 Replicates of 3 Different Lots @ 35 ppm Aliphatic Fraction: % Rec. Std.Dev. % RSD n-nonane (C9) 85.8 1.42 1.65 n-decane (C10) 87.7 1.59 1.82 n-dodecane (C12) 92.2 1.85 2.01 n-tetradecane (C14) 93.6 2.07 2.22 n-hexadecane (C16) 97.0 2.26 2.33 n-octadecane (C18) 99.2 2.03 2.05 n-nonadecane (C19) 103.0 2.15 2.08 n-eicosane (C20) 101.5 2.22 2.19 1-Chlorooctadecane 94.1 2.71 2.88 n-heneicosane (C21) 91.0 0.78 0.86 n-docosane (C22) 100.3 2.59 2.59 n-tetracosane (C24) 99.9 2.15 2.15 n-hexacosane (C26) 99.6 1.76 1.77 n-octacosane (C28) 99.5 1.85 1.86 n-triacontane (C30) 98.9 2.09 2.12 n-hexatricontane (C36) 98.2 2.90 2.96 n-octatriacontane (C38) 92.5 0.92 1.00 Tetracontane (C40) 91.7 0.85 0.92 40 140% Analyte Recovery Aromatic Fraction: % Rec. Std.Dev. % RSD 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 91.0 1.85 2.03 Naphthalene 92.8 4.22 4.55 2-Methylnaphthalene 94.1 4.17 4.43 2-Fluorobiphenyl 95.1 3.98 4.19 Acenaphthylene 95.4 3.92 4.11 2-Bromonaphthalene 96.4 3.98 4.13 Acenaphthene 95.9 4.02 4.19 Fluorene 97.2 4.03 4.14 Phenanthrene 99.5 4.09 4.11 Anthracene 98.6 4.02 4.07 o-terphenyl 96.6 3.94 4.08 Fluoanthene 98.6 4.15 4.21 Pyrene 99.5 4.20 4.22 Benzo(a)anthracene 99.2 4.45 4.49 Chrysene 99.6 4.55 4.56 Benzo(b) fluoranthene 100.7 4.69 4.66 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 100.0 4.65 4.65 Benzo(a)pyrene 98.8 4.62 4.67 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 99.3 4.66 4.69 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 98.7 4.64 4.70 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 99.4 4.66 4.69

Recovery Texas EPH Cartridge: Resprep EPH Fractionation SPE Cartridge Restek Cat # 25859 Reference Standards: MA EPH Surrogate Spike Mix Restek Cat # 31479 1-Chlorooctane Restek Cat # 30084 8270 Calibration Mix #5, Revised Restek Cat # 31995 BTEX Standard Restek Cat # 30213 TNRCC 1006 Retention Time Marker Mix Restek Cat # 31814 Custom 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene and Benzo(e)pyrene Mix

Recovery Texas Sample Preparation: Condition Cartridge with 15 ml Pentane Addition of 1 ml of Sample Elute with 40 ml of Pentane (Aliphatic Fraction), followed by 20 ml of Dichloromethane (Aromatic Fraction) Concentration to a final volume of 1 ml Analysis: Agilent 7890 GC-FID Column: Rxi-5Sil MS 30m x 0.25mm x 0.25µm Restek Cat # 13623 Oven Program: 35 C (4 min.) 200 C @10 C/min 260 C @ 4 C/min 330 C @20 C/min Injection temperature: 300 C; Injection volume: 1.0 μl, Carrier: He, constant flow 2 ml/min Inj. mode: pulsed splitless, 30 psi until 0.5 min, 75 ml/min at 0.6 min Detector Temp: 330 C

Recovery Texas Average (n = 3) @ 5ppm Aliphatic Fraction: % Rec. Std.Dev. % RSD n-hexane (C6) 76.7 1.17 1.52 n-heptane (C7) 75.1 1.69 2.25 n-octane (C8) 74.8 1.46 1.96 n-decane (C10) 78.8 1.62 2.06 1-Chlorooctane 78.9 1.13 1.44 n-dodecane (C12) 79.9 2.70 3.38 n-hexadecane (C16) 86.8 0.86 0.99 1-Chlorooctadecane 83.7 1.12 1.34 n-heneicosane (C21) 85.3 1.02 1.20 n-octacosane (C28) 86.4 0.76 0.88 n-pentatriacontane (C35) 83.3 0.98 1.18 60 140% Analyte Recovery 70 130% Surrogate Recovery Aromatic Fraction: % Rec. Std.Dev. % RSD Benzene 86.6 0.21 0.24 Toluene 127.5 1.45 1.13 Ethylbenzene 87.3 0.67 0.77 p-xylene 100.1 1.10 1.10 m-xylene 102.4 1.05 1.03 o-xylene 102.8 0.95 0.92 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 78.4 2.67 3.40 Naphthalene 80.3 5.94 7.40 2-Methylnaphthalene 81.2 0.75 0.92 1-Methylnapthalene 79.7 0.49 0.61 Acenaphthylene 76.0 1.10 1.45 Acenaphthene 79.9 0.14 0.17 Fluorene 82.7 3.22 3.89 Phenanthrene 81.8 0.89 1.09 Anthracene 76.7 1.38 1.79 o-terphenyl 80.2 1.40 1.74 Fluoranthene 79.2 1.47 1.85 Pyrene 78.9 4.16 5.27 Benz(a)anthracene 82.4 1.06 1.29 Chrysene 82.6 1.19 1.44 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 81.8 1.04 1.27 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 81.5 1.15 1.41 Benzo( e)pyrene 81.9 0.96 1.18 Benzo(a)pyrene 81.1 1.22 1.50 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 80.7 1.13 1.40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 77.9 3.49 4.48 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 75.2 5.94 7.91

Matrix Overview: Motor oil loading at a range of concentrations Evaluation of breakthrough of Naphthalene and 2- Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough of used motor oil samples at 20 mg/ml PAH levels

Cartridge Loading Capacity MADEP recommends maximum of 25 mg/ml Saturation of silica could lead to breakthrough of early eluting aromatics The separation is typically one of a delicate balance as it is without additional encumbrances Complex matrices A range of concentrations of motor oil were prepared Breakthrough of naphthalene and 2- methylnaphthalene monitored in hexane fraction

Sample Preparation Loading Capacity 5W/20 conventional motor oil was diluted into hexane to produce each target concentration Each sample was spiked with naphthalene and 2- methylnaphthalene at 10 ppm Surrogates 1-chlorooctadecane, o-terphenyl and fractionation surrogates, 2-bromonaphthlene and 2-fluorobiphenyl, were spiked at 20 ppm 6 levels of motor oil were prepared in hexane 5 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml

Sample Preparation Loading Capacity Sample Preparation: Condition Cartridge with 15 ml Hexane Addition of 1 ml of Sample Elute with 19 ml of Hexane (Aliphatic Fraction), followed by 20 ml of dichloromethane (Aromatic Fraction) Concentration to a final volume of 1 ml Analysis: Agilent 7890 GC-FID Column: Rxi-5Sil MS 30m x 0.32mm x 0.25µm Restek Cat # 13624 Oven Program: 40 C (1.5 min.) 300 C @12 C/min 350 C (7 min.) @ 6 C/min Injection temperature: 300 C; Injection volume: 1.0 μl, Carrier: Helium, constant flow @ 3 ml/min. Injection mode: splitless, purge flow: 50 ml/min. @ 1min. Detector Temp: 350 C

Sample Preparation Loading Capacity

Loading Capacity Results (100 mg/ml) naphthalene 2-methylnaphthalene naphthalene Blue trace aromatic fraction Red trace aliphatic fraction

PAHs in Used Motor Oil PAH is a result of incomplete combustion produced by internal combustion engines Can accumulate in motor oil through blow-by Would be expected in higher concentrations with increasing engine age and mileage Older technology and declining engine performance produce more PAH Deterioration of compression rings due to age and wear from high mileage increases blow-by Diesel vehicles produce more PAH during combustion

PAHs in Used Motor Oil Because of PAH content (as well as metals and other contaminants) used motor oil is more of a concern than new oil Wrecking yards, storage tanks

PAHs in Used Motor Oil Samples were collected from vehicles with a range of ages and mileage Sample ID Vehicle Year Car Mileage Oil Mileage Oil Wt 1B Ford Taurus Limited 2013 41,862 9,756 5w/20 2B Honda Pilot EX 2008 73,000 5,000 5w/20 3B Ford Taurus Limited 2013 53,500 6,000 5w/20 4B Chevy Camaro IROC-Z 1986 172,659 3,000 20w/50 5B Ford F-250 Ranger XLT 1971 103,000 2,000 20w/50 6B Ford F-250 Ranger XLT 2005 95,418 3,200 15w/40 7B Chevy Camaro Z-ZB 1994 105,464 728 5w/20 8B Chevy Camaro Z-ZB 1980 178,000 NA 20w/50

PAHs in Used Motor Oil Samples were collected from vehicles with a range of ages and mileage 1B 2B 4B 6B 7B 8B

PAHs in Used Motor Oil Extent of migration of color band during elution Sample Loading After Extraction

PAHs in Used Motor Oil (Breakthrough) naphthalene 2-methylnaphthalene 1 chlorooctadecane surr.

PAHs in Used Motor Oil (Breakthrough- Aromatic Fraction) Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene 10 ppm std. Sample 2B Sample 4B 5 ppm std.

PAHs in Used Motor Oil (Breakthrough- Aliphatic Fraction) Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Sample 2B DCM Sample 4B DCM Sample 2B hex Sample 4B hex

PAHs in Used Motor Oil (Heavier PAHs) Phenanthrene and anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene and chrysene fluoranthene and anthracene dibenzo(a,h)anthracene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene

PAHs in Used Motor Oil (Diesel compared to gasoline powered vehicle) surrogates

Likely Source of Lighter PAHs in Used Motor Oil (Diluted gasoline sample) Naphthalene 2-methylnaphthalene

Conclusions A method specific Silica gel cartridge provides excellent fractionation and cleanup properties even under heavy loading and with complex matrices PAHs were found in used motor oil samples but not necessarily correlated to vehicle age and mileage Likely reason for lack of correlation is that lighter PAHs are likely a result of concentrated gasoline in the oil rather than from blow-by

Questions? Alexandria Pavkovich alexandria.pavkovich@restek.com Jason Thomas jason.thomas@restek.com Trent Sprenkle trent.sprinkle@ restek.com