Final Series of Public Meetings

Similar documents
SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

PORTS-TO-PLAINS. Corridor Planning. Ports-to-Plains Stakeholder Meeting

SOUTH TEXAS COMMISSION MEETING

system performance I-820 East Loop FM 156 TxDOT is working to expand its busiest metropolitan corridors.

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Request for Design Exception (#1) S.M. Wright Phase IIB

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

STATE LOOP 195 PUBLIC MEETING. Footer Text

Arizona-Sonora Border Master Plan. Plan Maestro para la Frontera Arizona-Sonora

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

TURNPIKE SYSTEM. Summary information from: Texas Department of Transportation GENERAL INFORMATION & SYSTEM MAP JOA REALTY

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Business Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

MAP OR PHOTO. Public Meeting & Open House July 23, Project Roadway Limits From: FM 1957 To: FM 471. Counties Bexar & Medina

WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

METRO Light Rail Update

Public Information Workshop

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Transportation Highway Engineering Conference February 24, 2015

Corridor Sketch Summary

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Basic Project Information

TEXAS RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 (TRTP 2035)

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Planning of the HSR Network

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

City of Pacific Grove

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Railroad Impact Study

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Portland to Longview/Kelso, CHSR inter-city and inter-city express trains.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Summary of the Alcoa Highway Redevelopment Project

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Perry City 1200 West Walking/ Biking Path Project Type Pedestrian/ Bike

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA) AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA)

Tulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria and Rankings

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. October 2014

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

Highway 23 New London Access & Safety Assessment. Public Open House #2 October 3, :00 to 7:00 PM

CROSSING RAIL PROJECT (P4) RAIL

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Road User Cost Analysis

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Safety Evaluation of Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT or J-Turn) Projects in Louisiana

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

Key Project Elements Status Report

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

I-405 Corridor Master Plan

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Major Widening/New Roadway

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

Technical Feasibility Report

Los Angeles World Airports. LAX Landside Transportation Program

ODOT District Two Monthly Construction Update

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Community Meetings April/May, 2012

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

TRAFFIC SIMULATION IN REGIONAL MODELING: APPLICATION TO THE INTERSTATEE INFRASTRUCTURE NEAR THE TOLEDO SEA PORT

Traffic Study for Barstow 2014 General Plan Amendment. Prepared for: The City of Barstow. Prepared by: ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers

Development of the Preferred Option and Implementation Plan

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Wilsonville to Portland and Portland to Longview/Kelso.

Transcription:

Final Series of Public Meetings

Public Meeting Locations City Date Jasper Monday, September 26 Livingston Tuesday, September 27 Huntsville Wednesday, September 28 Bryan Thursday, September 29 Eldorado Monday, October 3 Brady Tuesday, October 4 Lampasas Wednesday, October 5 Killeen Thursday, October 6

Public Involvement Two Series of Public Meetings Three Newsletters Website: Visit www.txdot.gov and enter US 190 in search field Email: TPP_US_190_Study@txdot.gov Hotline: 1.866.721.7868 Mailing Address: US 190/I-10 Feasibility Study 412 North Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961

Study Participants Texas Department of Transportation Major Stakeholders Cities Counties MPOs/COGs Ports and Forts Railroad Companies Public Consultant Team

Study Corridor Sonora Menard Junction 281 US 190/I-10 from El Paso to Louisiana state line Approximately 900 miles in length Traverses 25 counties

Study Objectives Determine mobility and safety needs Evaluate impacts and feasibility of alternative transportation improvements Improve connections to military installations/deployment ports Identify alternative funding sources Develop prioritized implementation plan Obtain public/stakeholder input

Study Schedule WHERE WE ARE NOW

Evaluation Process Freeway Feasible? Conduct Detailed Evaluation Refine Alternatives Prioritize/Stage Improvements Identify Potential Funding Sources Four-Lane Highway Feasible? Interim/Localized Improvements Overpasses/Interchanges Passing Lanes Relief Routes Traffic Operational/ Geometric Improvements

Freeway v. Highway Characteristics Freeway (Four-Lane) Highway (Four-Lane) Access Full Access Control Partial Access Control Speed 55-70 mph 45-60 mph Right-of-Way 300-400 feet 250 feet Grade Separations/ Interchanges* 65-75 20-30 Roadway Capacity (LOS C) 55,000-60,000 vpd 35,000-40,000 vpd Cost per Mile $6 - $10 m $4 - $6 m * Indicates number of grade separations/interchanges along US 190

Total Freeway - Option 1 I-10 to US 277 to US 190 to LA state line Sonora Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway

Total Freeway - Option 2 I-10 to US 83 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Options FM 93, SH 30, SH 63 63 Sonora Menard Junction 281 93 30 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway

Four-Lane Highway - Option 1 I-10 to US 190 to LA state line Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Four-Lane Highway - Option 2 I-10 to US 277 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Options FM 93, SH 30, SH 63 63 Sonora Menard 281 93 30 Existing Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Four-Lane Highway - Option 3 I-10 to US 83 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Options FM 93, SH 30, SH 63 63 Sonora Menard Junction 281 93 30 Existing Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Freeway/Highway Combination Fort-to-Port - Option 1 I-10 to US 277 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Option SH 63 63 Sonora Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Freeway/Highway Combination Fort-to-Port Option 2 I-10 to US 277 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Option SH 63 63 Sonora Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Freeway/Highway Combination Evacuation I-10 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Option SH 63 63 Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Freeway/Highway Combination Mobility/Safety - Option 1 I-10 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Option SH 63 63 Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Freeway/Highway Combination Mobility/Safety - Option 2 I-10 to US 190 to LA state line Uses Option SH 63 63 Menard 281 Existing Freeway Proposed Freeway Proposed Four-Lane Divided Highway

Major Study Elements Traffic/ Safety Environmental/ Land Use PUBLIC INPUT Engineering/ Cost Considerations Cost Effectiveness Economic Development

Study Sections I-10 West US 190 Central US 190 East US 190 Menard Sonora Junction New Mexico to US 190 I-10 to US 281 US 281 to I-45 I-45 to Louisiana

Traffic Criteria Travel Demand Travel Time/Speed Congestion

Additional Lanes Needed - 2040 281 30

Additional Lanes Needed - 2040 With Gulf Coast Strategic Highway and 14 th Amendment Highway* 63 281 30 * Feasibility and Funding for Gulf Coast Strategic Highway and 14 th Amendment Highway have not been Determined

Environmental Criteria Land Use Natural Resources Cultural Resources Hazardous Materials Environmental Justice

Engineering Criteria Project Cost Right-of-Way Acquisition Operations and Maintenance Cost Safety Utilities

Economic Criteria Benefit/Cost Analysis Economic Development Impacts - Jobs - Income

Benefit/Cost Ratio - Freeway Marginally Feasible 281 93 Benefit/Cost Ratio = 1.0 to 1.5 Benefit/Cost Ratio of 1.0 or greater: benefits are equal to or outweigh the costs.

Benefit/Cost Ratio Four-Lane Highway Very Feasible 281 93 Benefit/Cost Ratio > 1.5 to 4.0 Benefit/Cost Ratio of 1.0 or greater: benefits are equal to or outweigh the costs.

Benefit/Cost Ratio Freeway With Gulf Coast Strategic Highway and 14 th Amendment Highway* Marginally Feasible 281 93 * Feasibility and Funding for Gulf Coast Strategic Highway and 14 th Amendment Highway have not been Determined Benefit/Cost Ratio = 1.0 to 1.5 Benefit/Cost Ratio of 1.0 or greater: benefits are equal to or outweigh the costs.

Benefit/Cost Ratio Four-Lane Highway With Gulf Coast Strategic Highway and 14 th Amendment Highway* Very Feasible 281 93 * Feasibility and Funding for Gulf Coast Strategic Highway and 14 th Amendment Highway have not been Determined Benefit/Cost Ratio > 1.5 to 4.0 Benefit/Cost Ratio of 1.0 or greater: benefits are equal to or outweigh the costs.

Total Freeway Option 1 Total Freeway Option 2 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 1 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 2 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 3 Fort to Port Option 1 Fort to Port Option 2 Evacuation Mobility/Safety Option 1 Mobility/Safety Option 2 Evaluation Results West US 190 Evaluation Criteria TRAFFIC 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 ENGINEERING 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 2 2 2 ENVIRONMENTAL 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 ECONOMICS 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 OVERALL 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 Most Favorable 4 Favorable 3 Neutral 2 Unfavorable 1 Most Unfavorable 0

Total Freeway Option 1 Total Freeway Option 2 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 1 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 2 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 3 Fort to Port Option 1 Fort to Port Option 2 Evacuation Mobility/Safety Option 1 Mobility/Safety Option 2 Evaluation Results Central US 190 Evaluation Criteria TRAFFIC 2 3 3 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 ENGINEERING 1 0 4 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 ENVIRONMENTAL 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ECONOMICS 3 1 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 OVERALL 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 Most Favorable 4 Favorable 3 Neutral 2 Unfavorable 1 Most Unfavorable 0

Total Freeway Option 1 Total Freeway Option 2 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 1 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 2 Total Four-Lane Hwy Option 3 Fort to Port Option 1 Fort to Port Option 2 Evacuation Mobility/Safety Option 1 Mobility/Safety Option 2 Evaluation Results East US 190 Evaluation Criteria TRAFFIC 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 3 ENGINEERING 1 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 ECONOMICS 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 OVERALL 2 2 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 Most Favorable 4 Favorable 3 Neutral 2 Unfavorable 1 Most Unfavorable 0

First Series of Public Meetings 8 Meeting Locations Over 170 Attendees What We Heard: Transportation Improvements Needed? 11% Yes 89% No

Public Ranking of Evaluation Criteria Agree/Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree/Strongly Disagree 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Relieve Congestion Enhance Safety Minimize Construction Costs Minimize Env / Land Use Impacts Promote Economic Development Improve Connectivity

Interim/Localized Improvements Overpasses/Interchanges Passing Lanes Relief Routes Standard Travel Lane and Shoulder Widths Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Traffic Operational and Geometric Improvements

Potential Relief/Alternative Routes 281 Copperas Cove Hearne Madisonville Potential Relief/Alternative Routes (Feasibility/Impacts Determined by Future Studies)

Traffic Operational/ Geometric Improvements 281 Copperas Cove Hearne Madisonville Potential Intersection/Traffic Operational Improvements - Traffic Signal Improvements - Intersection Turn Management Lanes/Restrictions - Other Access Management Measures Potential Highway Geometric Improvements - Eliminate Sharp Curves - Standard Travel Lane/Shoulder Widths - Standard Bridge Clearances

Potential Passing Lanes 63 281 30 Highway Sections to Consider Passing Lanes (Specific Locations Determined Later)

Potential Overpasses/Interchanges 281 30 Railroad Overpasses - US 190 at Gulf Colorado and San Saba Railway (Brady) - US 190 at Gulf Colorado and San Saba Railway (east of Rochelle) - SH 30 at BNSF (Shiro) Highway Overpasses - US 190 at US 77 South (east of Cameron) - US 190 at FM 2549 (south of Hearne) - US 190 at FM 2776 (Wixon Valley)

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Dynamic Message Signs Closed Circuit Cameras Highway Advisory Radio Emergency Management Maintenance and Construction Management

Next Steps Review/Incorporate Public Input Finalize Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives Refine and Prioritize Interim Improvements Investigate Funding Sources Prepare Final Study Report

Thank You! Open House Format Until 8:00 PM