Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) West Midlands (Centro) pilot

Similar documents
Bus Passenger Survey spring Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro

Bus Passenger Survey autumn 2013 results Merseytravel (Merseyside PTE area)

Tram Passenger Survey. Autumn 2013 Report

Tram Passenger Survey

Bus Passenger Survey

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Midland Metro

Bus Passenger Survey spring 2013 results

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Sheffield

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Manchester Metrolink

Bus Passenger Survey. Autumn 2015 Report

Glasgow Subway Passenger Survey

Passenger Promise and Rights: National Express Bus

Travel to Work Survey 2018

GfK. Growth from Knowledge

Onward travel. Insights from HS2 online panel

Rural bus services. September 2011

Passenger Promise and Rights: National Express Bus

2016 Car Tech Impact Study. January 2016

Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension

Tyne and Wear Metro: What passengers want from new trains. Full report Chime Insight and Engagement February 2017

TRANSPORT INFORMATION 2018/2019

Metro trains for the future: what our passengers have said

Online Shopper: New Car Intenders

Customer Charter Audit Quarter

Our Mobility Scooter Policy: A guide to taking mobility scooters on our trains

SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study

Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization

Service Standard Report

Includes. and information. new maps. Changes to bus routes in. Dudley & Sandwell. from 2nd September nxbus.co.uk/dudley

Integrating transport (buses)

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

by Hilton Hotel,Waterloo Road, London SE1 at 09am. Last departure from this stop is at hrs.

CUSTOMER CHARTER NSW. this IS HoW we roll CUSTOMER CHARTER. transitsystems.com.au

Consumer Attitude Survey

Car passengers on the UK s roads: An analysis. Imogen Martineau, BA (Hons), MSc

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

CALGARY TRANSIT 2013 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY DECEMBER HarGroup. M anagement Consultants

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Energy and Communications

This is an easy to read report.

Usage of solar electricity in the national energy market

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

IMPACT OF THE BUS LOCATION SYSTEM ON BUS USAGE. - Morioka City -

Pricing Strategies for Public Transport. Neil Douglas Douglas Economics

NATIONAL PASSENGER SURVEY - WAVE 23 - AUTUMN 2010

YouGovR. YouGov Survey Results YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved

Customer Survey. Motives and Acceptance of Biodiesel among German Consumers

SHOPPING AND TRANSPORT IN APPLEBY. Appleby Environment November 2010

Transport Group Perspective Chris Blow Chair of The Guildford Society Transport Group 21st Jan 2015

Public Opinion of Waterloo Region Rapid Transit Proposal May 2011

Includes. and information. new maps. Changes to bus routes in. South Birmingham. from 22nd July 2018

WEST YORKSHIRE BUS STRATEGY 2040

Continental Mobility Study Klaus Sommer Hanover, December 15, 2011

Taxi Mystery Shopping

BBC NEWSROUND SATs SURVEY

Produced by: Working in partnership with: Brake. the road safety charity

RACQ Mobility Survey - Taxis and Rideshare

Getting a Car J. Folta

2005 Canadian Consumer Tire Attitude Study Highlights

Trial of Seat Belts on School Buses in Queensland

Public Opinion of Air Pollution in Delhi

Where are we heading? Paths to mobility of tomorrow The 2018 Continental Mobility Study

COSTS IN PREVENTION OF CRIME ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT

MOBILITY SCOOTER SAFETY GUIDE

How BRT can develop the bus mode in Dublin Paddy Doherty, Chief Executive, Dublin Bus

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Advanced Level BUSINESS STUDIES 9707/03

Patrons will be allowed access into the venue by the Gate Number denoted on their tickets.

Bus Service Changes. Changes to Local Bus Service Registrations within the West Midlands. Produced by the Network Delivery Team

From a marketplace for mobility towards Mobility as a Service in Rotterdam (Nl)

The Experience of Vienna City

Example of a successful campaign in the Liszki District near Kraków

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA

Service Standard Report

Driving home for Christmas could save Brits nearly half compared to taking the train 1

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Institutional Research and Planning 440 Day Hall Ithaca, New York PULSE Survey

Welcome to Nottingham s tram network

HOW REAL PEOPLE VIEW THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

The U.S. Auto Industry, Washington and New Priorities:

TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING

Trend Report on Competition and Consumer Confidence in the Energy Market Second half of 2011

Public Transportation SPEAKING

An Evaluation of Coin-Operated Breath Testing Machines in South Australian Licensed Premises

MAR1011. West Birmingham Bus Network Review March 2010

1 Have you used Sun Trolley (which also includes Riverwalk Trolley)? Yes (Go to Question #2) No (Go to Question #10)

Results from the North American E-bike Owner Survey

Seat Belt Survey. Q1. When travelling in a car, do you wear your seat belt all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or never?

Schoolcraft County Public Transit

Riding Metrobus 16H from GHBC to Pentagon City (last update Oct )

Certificate in a vocational program

Weaving a local web. Evaluating the effectiveness of Let s Carpool to encourage carpooling to work. Prepared for Greater Wellington Regional Council

Impact of Copenhagen s

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

Motorcycle Safety Questionnaire

Europeans and responsible driving 2017

Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

Welcome to Connexxion!

BUS SERVICES IN CHAMBERLAYNE ROAD NW10

Best Route. Best Care. The Milwaukee Regional Medical Center s Alternative Transportation Program

Passenger Information The informed traveller

Transcription:

Passenger Survey (TPS) West Midlands (Centro) pilot June 201 Contact: Keith Bailey, Research Team, Passenger Focus Fleetbank House, 2- Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y JX Tel: 000 12 022 Email: keith.bailey@passengerfocus.org.uk

Contents Page Passenger Focus introduction BDRC Continental s TPS report: Summary of findings 1 Section 1 TPS results compared with BPS 1 Section 2 Selected TPS results compared with NPS and BPS 41 Appendix TPS Questionnaire

The Passenger Survey (TPS) Passenger Focus runs both the National Passenger Survey (NPS), which provides a detailed picture of rail passengers journey experiences, and the Passenger Survey (BPS) providing similar il data for the bus sector The Passenger Survey (TPS) aims to extend coverage to this additional sector and provide a cross modal comparison of tram with bus in particular To establish the viability of TPS and test the survey methodology and questionnaire content, a pilot study was run in the West Midlands area with the kind co-operation of Centro Centro manages the tram line from Birmingham Snow Hill to Wolverhampton St George s which is operated by National Express West Midlands

TPS objectives and sample Our objective is to understand tram passengers end-to-end journey experience on a specific trip and to measure satisfaction against a range of attributes As with BPS, TPS uses a representative sample of journeys (services) with data then weighted according to observed passenger volumes (counts) Interviewers worked in three-hour shifts between am and 10pm across all seven days of the week. Fieldwork was conducted between 17 February and 1 March 201 Where practical, TPS uses identical questions to BPS thus facilitating a cross-modal comparison of passenger satisfaction; although the questions may differ slightly, some measures are also comparable with NPS BDRC Continental managed the survey on behalf of Passenger Focus. A detailed methodology report is available separately 4

TPS data collection TPS follows the approach of both NPS and BPS in using a paper self- completion questionnaire filled in by the passenger and returned in a Freepost envelope In the West Midlands TPS pilot, we also tested an on-line and a mixed mode approach We recommend that the mixed approach be refined and implemented in expanding TPS coverage to other tram systems The results reported in this document are based solely on the pilot s paper questionnaire i returns to provide absolute comparability with BPS data for the region TPS also follows BPS practice in the main with interviewers eliciting passengers co-operation and distributing questionnaires on the vehicle For peak hour shifts where it was feared that interviewers might have difficulty boarding and moving through crowded trams, passengers were approached at the tram stop Experience with the pilot has shown that this issue is less of a problem than anticipated and that a modified protocol for boarding peak hour trams where practical should be adopted to minimize the number of less desirable at-stop approaches

The Passenger Survey (TPS) What did we find? High levels of satisfaction among tram passengers: - 90 per cent satisfied overall, rising to 97 per cent satisfaction for those aged over 0 Satisfaction with the tram is consistently higher than that recorded for most bus and rail journeys in the area: Train - Overall journey 90% 79% % - Value for money % 0% 1% - Punctuality/running on time 7% 4% 74% - Space to sit/stand 74% 7% 7% - /bus stop/station 7% 7% 7% - Information at stop/station 0% 70% % - Personal safety at stop/station 79% % 7% - Personal security on board 4% 70% 7%

The Passenger Survey (TPS) What did we find? The majority (7 per cent) of tram passengers use the digital display at the tram stop to estimate arrival times. For bus it was only 17 per cent using digital (with per cent relying on paper timetables at the stop) The level of anti-social behaviour experienced was lower on the tram (7 per cent) than on the bus (17 per cent) - particularly for the 1-4 age group ( per cent and 21 per cent respectively) One of the main reasons for choosing the tram was that it was deemed quicker than other forms of transport 7

The Passenger Survey (TPS) What did we find? Passengers still saw room for improvement: - faster journey times - more capacity and better provision of hand/grab rails on board the tram - conductors being more informed about delays and alternative means of transport when there was disruption

The Passenger Survey (TPS) What next? This report raises several interesting questions: - s are clearly liked by passengers: to what extent can they be used as a gateway mode to attract nonusers to public transport? - Satisfaction with personal security is higher and the level of incidence of anti-social behaviour lower on the tram than on the bus: to what extent does the presence of the conductor influence this? 9

The Passenger Survey (TPS) What next? Satisfaction with the information provided at the tram stop is higher than at the bus stop: - To what extent do the digital displays provided engender a higher degree of confidence? - To what extent might this also help drive perceptions of punctuality and reliability? These questions would benefit from further investigation/testing i i i not only within the Centro area but also within other regions where trams operate 10

The Passenger Survey (TPS) What next? Passenger Focus is keen to roll out TPS to other light rail systems in England and will be entering into discussions ssions with the operators and authorities A national TPS will permit comparisons and benchmarking of passengers experiences in different cities nationally as well as with the local bus services and, where appropriate, train services 11

Passenger Survey (TPS) Spring 201 results West Midlands PTE area Contact: Keith ihbailey, Research Team, Passenger Focus Fleetbank House, 2 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y JX Tel: 000 12 04 Email: keith.bailey@passengerfocus.org.uk March 201

Summary of findings (1/2) TPS Pilot Overall satisfaction rating was higher for the tram (90 per cent) than the bus (79 per cent) or train ( per cent). This high rating was consistent across all the main passenger groups Amongst fare-paying passengers the value-for-money rating was higher for the tram ( per cent) compared to the bus (0 per cent) and, marginally, the train (1 per cent) When evaluating value for money tram passengers were more likely to make comparison with other modes of transport, whereas bus passengers were more likely to take into account the distance of their journey Reasons for making a journey on the tram were almost identical to those given for using the bus. For all three modes of transport four in ten passengers were travelling to or from work Overall, higher satisfaction was measured for tram stops than bus stops. In particular tram stops were less likely to suffer from graffiti and litter 1

Summary of findings (2/2) TPS Pilot The punctuality of the tram was especially praised, 7 per cent of tram users were satisfied compared to only 4 per cent of bus users and 74 per cent of train users The on-board facilities were generally rated a little higher for the tram than the bus, especially the cleanliness of the interior and provision of information The tram did not rate as well as the bus on the provision of grab rails when needing to move around Staff for both the bus and tram were rated highly. Passengers were more likely to be bothered by anti-social behaviour on the bus than the tram Both the tram and bus had similar levels of satisfaction for their respective journey times. An improvement spontaneously mentioned by tram passengers was for a faster service Other improvements spontaneously mentioned included the conductor being more informed about why there were delays, better provision of grab rails, bigger trams needed to ease overcrowding in rush hour and faster journey times 14

Section 1 TPS results compared with BPS Passenger Survey (TPS) Spring 201 results compared to Passenger Survey (BPS) Autumn results West Midlands PTE area

Methodology (TPS) Fieldwork: 17 February to 1 March 201 Interviewer shifts: covered all days of the week and ran between am to 10pm. Each interviewer worked a three hour shift Method: Self-completion paper p questionnaires Sample size: 2 interviews Research agency: BDRC Continental (BPS) data for West Midlands PTE area Fieldwork: 2 September to 12 December Interviewer shifts: covered all days of the week and ran between am to 10pm. Each interviewer worked a three hour shift Method: Self-completion paper questionnaires Sample size: 2 interviews Research agency: GfK NOP Ltd For the 2011 and BPS data the +/ symbols shown against some figures indicates that the difference between the 2011 and figures is statistically significant at the 9 per cent confidence level. 1

Passenger profile Age 201 2011 1 to 4 to 9 Over 0 41% % 2% 42% 7% 21% 42% 7% 22% Access to private transport Easy Moderate Limited/none Has a disability Yes 201 2011 2% 21% 2% % % 41% 9% 4% % 201 2011 14% 20% 19% Ticket type Free-pass holders Fare-payers 201 24% 7% 2011 2% 7% 24% 7% Q. Overall, taking everything into account from the start to the end of this tram/bus journey, how satisfied were you with your tram/bus journey? 17

journey details Nearly half of tram passengers boarded at either Birmingham Snow Hill or Wolverhampton St George s A similar number also disembarked at these two stops The next most popular stop was West Bromwich Central which approximately one in 10 passengers used Nearly eight in 10 passengers (7 per cent) were travelling alone The average waiting time for a tram was four minutes 77 per cent of passengers had a seat for their whole journey. 10 per cent said they had to stand but would have liked to have a seat 1

How got to and from the tram Get to tram Leave tram On foot Cycled Car - dropped off Car - park and ride Car - parked elsewhere Taxi /coach Train Other 1% 1% 4% 4% % % 4% % 1% 1% 4% 4% 1% 1% 2% 21% 7% % Rating of tram connecting with other forms of transport? Very good Fairly good Neither good nor poor Fairly poor Very poor All passengers - TPS 4 44 9 1 Q: How did you get to and from the tram stop you boarded/left the tram today? Q: How would you rate your local tram services for connections with other forms of public transport? 19

Overall satisfaction (1) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 4 1 90% Male 4 2 1 90% Female 4 2 90% Age 1 to 4 4 44 7 4 2 7% Age to 9 7 4 2 1 91% Age 0+ 79 1 02 1 97% 2011 All Passengers 44 1 79%(-) 1% Male 4 14 7% 79% Female 4 12 0%(-) 2% Age 1 to 4 24 0 1 7 4 74% 7% Age to 9 4 1 4 7%(-) 2% Age 0+ 9 2 2 1 91% 90% Q. Overall, taking everything into account from the start to the end of this tram/bus journey, how satisfied were you with your tram/bus journey? 20

Overall satisfaction (2) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 4 1 90% Fare-payers 49 9 7 4 2 % Free pass holders 79 19 111 9% Commuting 4 4 7 4 % Not commuting 7 21 10 9% 2011 All passengers 44 1 79% (-) 1% Fare-payers 2 4 14 4 7% (-) 7% Free pass holders 4 11 9% 9% Commuting 2 49 1 4 74% (-) 77% Not commuting 4 40 9 4 2 % 4% Q. Overall, taking everything into account from the start to the end of this tram/bus journey, how satisfied were you with your tram/bus journey? 21

Value for money (fare-payers only) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 2 40 1 14 % Age 1 to 4 19 40 1 1 11 9% Age to 9 29 41 1 10 70% Commuting 1 41 1 14 9% Not commuting 2 41 1 7 7% 2011 All passengers 20 0 19 1 14 0% 1% Age 1 to 4 19 27 1 1 1 4% 4% Age to 9 21 4 21 14 10 % (-) % Commuting 1 1 21 17 14 4% 0% Not commuting 24 0 1 14 14 % 2% Q. How satisfied were you with the value for money of your journey? 22

What influences value-for-money rating Cost for distance travelled Fare compared to everyday items Other reason Cost tram/bus versus other transport Comfort/quality for the fare paid TPS - 201 2 0 9 1 22 BPS - 22 1 10 20 BPS - 2011 22 14 10 19 Q. What had the biggest influence on the value for money rating you gave in the previous question? 2

Journey purpose Travelling to/from work 42 Travelling to/from education 1 Shopping trip 19 Visit friends or relatives 10 Leisure trip Other 2011 Travelling to/from work % (+) % Travelling to/from education 1 1% 1% Shopping trip 2 2% (-) 2% Visit friends or relatives 10 10% 11% Leisure trip 4 4% (-) % Other 9 9% (-) 11% Q. What is the main purpose of your tram/bus journey today? 24

Reason for choosing the tram Quicker than other transport 0 Best way to get where I am going 0 More convenient than the car 1 Didn t have the option of travelling by other means Cheaper than the car 10 12 Cheaper than other transport more comfortable than other transport 4 Prefer tram to walking/cycling 1 Other Q. What was the main reason you chose the tram for this journey? 2

Method of buying ticket (fare-payers only) and ticket format (all passengers) Conductor that day 7 Direct from the tram company 7 Paper ticket/pass % Rail/ bus company A photo card ticket/pass 1% Travel Shop 17 A plastic card 2% Local shop or post office Direct debit through work/college Other 10 1 Ticket on mobile 0% Other format 1% Driver that day Driver before today Direct from the bus company Travel centre/bus station/booking office Local shop or post office Direct debit through work/college 1 9 9 20 22 Paper ticket/pass 2% A photo card ticket/pass 49% A plastic card 1% Ticket on mobile 1% Other 4 Other format 1% Q. How did you buy that ticket or pass? & Q. In what format was your ticket? 2

Satisfaction - with the tram/bus stop (Net very/fairly) 201 Distance from journey start 47 14 2 1 % Convenience/accessability General condition/std of maint. Freedom from graffiti/vandalism Freedom from litter Info provided at the stop Personal safety at stop Overall sat - tram stop 47 4 9 40 4 4 41 9 41 42 42 12 9 1 1 9 2 1 2 10 20 1 1 2 1 % 2% % % 0% 79% 7% 2011 Distance from journey start 42 12 4 4 1% -- Convenience/accessability 4 9 9 4 4% -- General condition/std of maint. 2 4 1 7 70% % Freedom from graffiti/vandalism 2 9 1 71%(+) % Freedom from litter Info provided at the stop Personal safety at stop Overall sat - bus stop 2 27 2 27 7 4 9 4 1 1 21 1 12 9 7 2%(+) 70% %(+) 7%(+) 9% -- 1% % Q. Thinking about the ram/bus stop itself, how satisfied were you with the following: & Q. Overall, how satisfied were you with the bus stop? 27

Satisfaction with wait time and how actual wait time compared to expected wait time (Net very/fairly) 201 2011 Sat with punctuality - TPS 0 7 7 7% Sat with punctuality - BPS 2 2 1 1 4% 4% 201 2011 Actual vs expected waiting time - TPS 17 22 0 9% Actual vs expected waiting time - BPS 12 44 19 17 20% 2% Much less A little less About expected A little longer Much longer Q. How satisfied were you with each of the following? & Q. Thinking about the time you waited for the tram/bus today, was [ ] than expected 2

How passengers estimated tram/bus arrival time Looked up times on the internet Timetable at stop Digital display at stop Just knew the times Knew trams ran frequently Knew through another means Did not know when the was 1 2 7 9 1 7 Looked up times in advance Timetable at stop Digital it display at stop Info direct from bus company Knew buses ran frequently Knew through another means Did not know when bus would arrive 1 4 14 17 1 0 Q. How did you know when the tram/bus was meant to arrive? (More than one response permissible) 29

Satisfaction with tram/bus departure (Net very/fairly) 201 Route/destination info 49 1 11 % Exterior cleanliness 40 44 1 2 1 4% Ease of getting on/off tram % Time taken to board 2 2 90% 2011 Route/destination info 41 1 79%(+) 7% Exterior cleanliness 27 42 20 7 4 9%(+) 4% Ease of getting on/off bus 47 40 7%(+) 4% Time taken to board 4 9 7%(+) 4% Q. Thinking about when the tram arrived, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: 0

Satisfaction on the tram/bus (Net very/fairly) 201 Interior cleanliness/condition 41 4 1 % Info provided inside the tram Availability of seating or space to stand Comfort of the seats Amount of personal space Provision of grab rails to stand/move Temperature inside the tram Personal security 4 40 1 27 4 40 9 4 4 7 4 42 44 14 12 9 1 21 9 1 11 9 11 7 12 4 11 2 2 % 74% 74% % 70% 77% 4% 2011 Interior cleanliness/condition Info provided inside the bus 2 41 1 1 20 1 7 4 4%(+) %(+) 9% % Availability of seating or space to stand 42 12 4 7%(+) 7% Comfort of the seats 2 42 1 9 9%(+) 7% Amount of personal space 2 7 1 12 % -- Provision of grab rails to stand/move Temperature inside the bus Personal security 4 2 0 42 40 4 1 20 14 4 77% 70% 70% 77% 70% 9% Q. Thinking about whilst you were on the tram, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: 1

Satisfaction - with the tram staff/bus driver (Net very/fairly) 201 Appearance 49 40 9 20 9% Greeting/welcome 40 21 1 7% Helpfulness/attitude 44 4 1 4 1 7% Smoothness/freedom from jolting 2 4 1 4 7% Safety of the driving 4 9 10 90% 2011 Appearance 4 14 21 % 4% Greeting/welcome 24 2 29 9 9 2% 2% Helpfulness/attitude 27 29 0 7 % % Smoothness/freedom from jolting 2 7 19 9 7 % % Safety of the driving 40 9 1 79% 7% Q. Thinking about the staff on board the tram, please indicate how satisfied you were with each of the following: 2

Incidence (per cent) of experiencing anti-social behaviour All passengers Male Female 7 7 7 Age 1 to 4 Age to 9 7 Age 0+ 2011 All passengers Male Female Age 1 to 4 Age to 9 1 1 17 1 21 1% 21% 1% 21% 1% Age 0+ 10 11% Q. Did other passengers behaviour give you cause to worry or make you feel uncomfortable during your journey?

Types of anti-social behaviour experienced on the tram Feet on seats Passengers under influence of alcohol l 2 Passengers playing loud music Loud use of mobiles 24 24 Rowdy behaviour Passengers not paying fares 20 19 Passengers under influence of drugs Abusive or threatening behaviour Graffiti/ vandalism Smoking 2 2 Q. What were the reasons fo other passengers behaviour causing you concern? (caution small base 4 passengers) 4

Frequency of using the tram or more days a week 4% or 4 days a week Once or twice a week 19% 19% Once a fortnight Once a month % % Less frequently 9% Q. How often do you typically travel by tram?

Satisfaction - with on-vehicle journey time and factors affecting journey length (Net very/fairly) 201 Satisfaction with tram journey time 47 9 4 2 % Satisfaction with bus journey time 4 11 1% 10 per cent of tram passengers experienced delay Congestion/traffic jam Road works 10 driver driving too slowly 19 Waiting too long at stops 19 Time it took passengers to board Other 7 Small base: 4 Doors jamming Power cuts Signal failure/broke down Q. How satisfied were you with the length of time your journey on the tram/bus took? & Q. Was the length of your journey affected by any of the following? (More than one response permissible)

Availability of information inside the tram/bus Route map/journey times 2 Audio announcements Digital next stop display 7 Fares/ticket info 2 Timetable 17 How to make a complaint 0 Route map/journey times 12 Audio announcements Digital next stop display Fares/ticket info Timetable 11 How to make a complaint 2 Q. Were any of these items of information present on the tram/bus? NOTE: The yes proportion is calculated based on those answering compared to whole survey 7

Factors frequently preventing more journeys being made Places reachable Frequency of s Reliability of s Cost of using s Journey times Comfort of s Concern for personal safety 9 10 14 19 22 Places reachable 27 27%(+) 2011 24% Frequency of buses %(+) 29% Reliability of buses %(+) 4% Cost of using buses 24 24%(+) 22% Journey times 29 29%(+) 2% Comfort of buses 1 1%(+) 11% Concern for personal safety 1 1%(+) 1% Q. Have any of the following frequently stopped you making journeys by tram/bus? (More than one answer permissible)

Key drivers of satisfaction Value for money Safety of driving Access to amenities Punctuality Personal safety Ease of getting on and off Availability of seating Journey time All passengers 21 11 10 4 Peak time travellers 22 21 1 27 9

Some suggested improvements to the tram service from passengers For the staff to be more helpful when there is a problem. When the conductor was asked what the problem was and why the journey was cut short he replied I don't know, go and ask the di driver. More information on the delays and then what to do to get home when stranded in an area I don't know when power failure stopped tram. None of the staff were sure what I needed to do and I had to rely on strangers to assist. I had to catch two buses to get to my car. Including delays this morning I was travelling for four hours! Hand rails are in the middle of the seating area where it's most inconvenient i to stand! Then there are hardly any rails to hold on to in the busiest areas by the doors so people struggle to stay upright and have to reach across other passengers to grab a rail. Worst possible design for the rush hour! I believe the trams should be slightly longer to cater for the busy times, especially for morning peak-time travel and evening peak-time travel. Morning travel towards Snow Hill can be very difficult as it's too busy and you find yourself waiting for another tram as you cannot get on. Instead of stopping at every stop, use a system like the buses. Speed things up. Stop increasing the ticket prices. 40

Section 2 Selected TPS results compared with NPS and BPS Passenger Survey (TPS) Spring 201 results compared to Passenger Survey y( (BPS) Autumn results and National Passenger Survey (NPS) Autumn and Spring results West Midlands PTE area While the NPS questionnaire covers many similar attributes, the questions may differ in their wording and use different scales; care should thus be exercised when reviewing these comparisons.

Methodology (TPS) Fieldwork: 17 February to 1 March 201 Interviewer shifts: covered all days of the week and ran between am to 10pm. Each interviewer worked a three hour shift Method: Self-completion paper questionnaires Sample size: 2 interviews Research agency: BDRC Continental (BPS) data for West Midlands PTE area Fieldwork: 2 September to 12 December Interviewer shifts: covered all days of the week and ran between am to 10pm. Each interviewer worked a three hour shift Method: Self-completion paper questionnaires Sample size: 2 interviews Research agency: GfK NOP Ltd Train (NPS) data for West Midlands PTE area Fieldwork: 1 September to 12 November Interviewer shifts: covered all days of the week and ran between am to 10pm. Each interviewer worked a three hour shift Method: Self-completion paper questionnaires Sample size: 49 interviews Research agency: BDRC Continental Data note: For questions not included on the Autumn NPS the Spring NPS has been used (base ) For the 2011 and BPS and NPS data the +/ symbols shown against some figures indicates that the difference between the 2011 and figures is statistically significant at the 9 per cent confidence level 42

NPS sample definition The total number of stations identified as falling within the Centro area are shown in the table below. The stations sampled in the Autumn wave and the number of interviews i (unweighted) achieved at each are also shown in the table below. Those stations with no figures were not included in the Autumn sample. Acocks Green Earlswood (West Midlands) Small Heath Adderley Park Erdington () Smethwick Galton Bridge Aston Five Ways (11) Smethwick Rolfe Street Berkswell Four Oaks Solihull (2) Bescot Stadium (1) Gravelly Hill Spring Road Birmingham International () Hall Green Stechford Birmingham Moor Street (4) Hampton-in-Arden Stourbridge Junction Birmingham New Street (11) Hamstead (Birmingham) Stourbridge Town Birmingham Snow Hill (4) Jewellery Quarter Sutton Coldfield (14) Blake Street Kings Norton Tame Bridge Parkway Bloxwich Langley Green (7) The Hawthorns Bloxwich North Lea Hall Tile Hill Bordesley Longbridge (11) Tipton Bournville (2) Lye Tyseley y Butlers Lane Marston Green University (Birmingham) (10) Canley (11) Northfield Walsall Chester Road Old Hill Whitlocks End Coseley Olton Widney Manor Coventry () Perry Barr Witton Cradley Heath Rowley Regis Wolverhampton (17) Dorridge (1) Sandwell and Dudley (1) Wylde Green Duddeston Selly Oak Wythall Dudley Port Shirley Yardley Wood 4

Passenger profile Age 201 2011 Train 2011 1 to 4 to 9 Over 0 41% % 2% 42% 7% 21% 42% 7% 22% 27% % % 2% 9% 0% Access to private transport Easy Moderate Limited/None Has a disability Yes 201 2011 2% 21% 2% % % 41% 9% 4% % 201 2011 14% 20% 19% Train (Spring) 11% Ticket type Free pass holders Fare-payers 201 24% 7% 2011 2% 7% 24% 7% 44

How got to and from the tram/train Train (Spring ) On foot Cycled Car - dropped off Car - park and ride Car - parked elsewhere Taxi /coach Train Other Get to tram Leave tram 1% 1% 4% 4% % % 4% % 1% 1% 2% 21% 4% 4% 1% 1% 7% % Get to train Leave train On foot Cycled 2% 1% Car - dropped off % % Car - park and ride (not asked) Car - parked elsewhere 1% 19% Taxi 2% % /coach 1% 14% Train 4% 1% Other % % 2% % Q: How did you get to and from the tram stop you boarded/left the tram today? Q: How did you get to the train station where you were handed this questionnaire and from the station you finished your train journey today? : 4

Overall satisfaction (1) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 4 1 90% Male 4 2 1 90% Female 4 2 90% 2011 All passengers 44 1 79%(-) 1% Male 4 14 7% 79% Female 4 12 0%(-) 2% Train All passengers 4 4 10 1 % Male 44 42 9 2 % Female 41 44 12 0 % Q. Overall, taking everything into account from the start to the end of this tram/bus journey, how satisfied were you with your tram/bus journey? 4

Overall satisfaction (2) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 4 1 90% Age 1 to 4 4 44 7 4 2 7% Age to 9 7 4 2 1 91% Age 0+ 79 1 02 1 97% 2011 All passengers 44 1 79%(-) 1% Age 1 to 4 24 0 1 7 4 74% 7% Age to 9 4 1 4 7%(-) 2% Age 0+ 9 2 2 1 91% 90% Train All passengers 4 4 10 1 % Age 1 to 4 29 1 0 1 % Age to 9 9 4 9 1 4% Age 0+ 1 2 2 1 9% Q. Overall, taking everything into account from the start to the end of this tram/bus journey, how satisfied were you with your tram/bus journey? 47

Overall satisfaction () (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 4 1 90% Commuting 4 4 7 4 % Not commuting 7 21 10 9% 2011 All passengers 44 1 79% (-) 1% Commuting 2 49 1 4 74% (-) 77% Not commuting 4 40 9 4 2 % 4% Train All passengers 4 4 10 1 % Commuting 29 2 14 4 2 1% Not commuting 2 7 0 9% Q. Overall, taking everything into account from the start to the end of this tram/bus journey, how satisfied were you with your tram/bus journey? 4

Value for money (tram and bus: fare-payers only) (1) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 2 40 1 14 % Age 1 to 4 19 40 1 1 11 9% Age to 9 29 41 1 10 70% 2011 All passengers 20 0 19 1 14 0% 1% Age 1 to 4 19 27 1 1 1 4% 4% Age to 9 21 4 21 14 10 % (-) % Train All passengers 2 20 1 1% Age 1 to 4 19 0 2 20 7 49% Age to 9 24 1 1 7 2% Q. How satisfied were you with the value for money of your journey? 49

Value for money (tram and bus: fare-payers only) (2) (Net very/fairly) 201 All passengers 2 40 1 14 % Commuting 1 41 1 14 9% Not commuting 2 41 1 7 7% 2011 All passengers 20 0 19 1 14 0% 1% Commuting 1 1 21 17 14 4% 4% Not commuting 24 0 1 14 14 % % Train All passengers 2 20 1 1% Commuting 1 2 2 22 4% Not commuting 9 4 1 4 7% Q. How satisfied were you with the value for money of your journey? 0

Satisfaction with tram/bus/train punctuality/running on time (Net very/fairly) 201 2011 Sat with punctuality - TPS 0 7 7 7% Sat with punctuality - BPS 2 2 1 1 4% 4% Sat with punctuality/reliablity -NPS 9 10 7 74% (-) 1% Q. How satisfied were you with tram/bus punctuality/running on time Q. How satisfied were you with the punctuality reliability of the train (i.e. the train arriving/departing on time) 1

Journey purpose Travelling to/from work 42 Travelling to/from education 1 Shopping trip 19 Visit friends or relatives 10 Leisure trip Other NET commuting 7 NET leisure 4 Travelling to/from work % (+) Travelling to/from education 1 1% Shopping trip 2 2% (-) Visit friends or relatives 10 10% Leisure trip 4 4% (-) Other 9 9% (-) NET commuting 4 NET leisure 4 2011 % 1% 2% 11% % 11% Train Commuter iness Leisure 10 2 % 10% 2% 2011 % 10% 2% Q. What is the main purpose of your tram/bus/train journey today? 2

Satisfaction with the tram/bus/train stop/station (1) (Net very/fairly) 201 Overall sat - tram stop 4 42 1 7% General condition/std of maint. 4 12 2 2% Freedom from litter 4 42 9 1 % 2011 Overall sat - bus stop 27 4 1 7%(+) % General condition/std of maint. 2 4 1 7 70% % Freedom from litter 2 7 1 12 2%(+) 9% Train 2011 Overall sat - train station 1 47 1 7 2 7% % Upkeep/repair of the station 29 4 14 2 7% 77% Cleanliness of the station 2 47 1 7 1 79% 79% Q. Thinking about the tram/bus/train stop/station itself, how satisfied were you with the following: & Q. Overall, how satisfied were you with the bus/tram/train stop/station?

Satisfaction with the tram/bus/train stop/station (2) (Net very/fairly) 201 Info provided at the stop 9 41 1 1 0% Personal safety at stop 40 9 1 2 79% 2011 Info provided at the stop 27 4 1 9 70% -- Personal safety at stop 2 9 21 7 %(+) 1% Train Provision of information at the station 44 4 9 4 1 2011 % % Personal security at the station 27 4 22 1 7% 71% Q. Thinking about the tram/bus/train stop/station itself, how satisfied were you with the following: & Q. Overall, how satisfied were you with the bus/tram/train stop/station? 4

Satisfaction with tram/bus/train departure and on board staff (Net very/fairly) 201 Exterior cleanliness Ease of getting on/off tram 40 44 1 2 1 4% % Helpfulness/attitude 44 4 1 4 1 7% 2011 Exterior cleanliness Ease of getting on/off bus 27 42 20 7 4 47 40 9%(+) 7%(+) 4% 4% Helpfulness/attitude 27 29 0 7 % % Train Very good Fairly good Neither good nor poor Fairly poor Very poor 2011 Cleanliness of the outside Ease of getting on/off train 41 0 9 1 11 1 1 %(+) 0% 7% 2% Helpfulness/attitude (Spring ) 4 27 2 1% NA Q. Thinking about when the tram/bus arrived, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: Q. How would you rate the train you boarded in terms of:

Satisfaction on the tram/bus/train (1) Interior cleanliness/condition 41 4 (Net very/fairly) 201 1 % Info provided inside the tram 4 42 1 21 % Personal security 40 44 11 2 2 4% 2011 Interior cleanliness/condition 2 41 1 1 4%(+) 9% Info provided inside the bus 20 1 7 4 %(+) % Personal security 0 40 20 4 70% 9% Train Cleanliness of the inside 49 7 0 2011 % 0% Provision of information on the train 4 40 14 9 2 74% 70% Personal security 40 9 19 21 7% 7% Q. Thinking about whilst you were on the tram/bus, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: Q. How would you rate the train you boarded in terms of:

Satisfaction on the tram/bus/train (2) (Net very/fairly) 201 Availability of seating or space to stand 40 4 9 9 74% Comfort of the seats 1 4 1 74% 2011 Availability of seating or space to stand 42 12 4 7%(+) 7% Comfort of the seats 2 42 1 9 9%(+) 7% Train 2011 Sufficient room to sit/stand 7 12 7 7% 71% Comfort of the seating area 7 4 1 4 0% 7% Q. Thinking about whilst you were on the tram/bus, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: Q. How would you rate the train you boarded in terms of: 7

Appendix QUESTIONNAIRE

Questionnaire (1/4) Passenger Survey Shift Date Passenger Focus is the official, independent consumer organisation that represents Train, and passengers across England (except London). To help us represent the views of passengers in your local area we would appreciate a little of your time to complete this questionnaire about your journey today. companies, local authorities and Government pay close attention to the survey s results and the survey provides the evidence for us to seek improvements on your behalf. To find out more about our work please visit www.passengerfocus.org.uk. You can also follow us on Twitter @passengerfocus Please fill in the questionnaire after you have completed your journey. Please tick only one box per question, unless that question requests otherwise. After completing the questionnaire, please return it using the postage paid envelope provided. 1. About your journey today Q1a. Q1b. At which stop did you board this? At which stop did you leave this? Q2. Please fill in the time that you boarded the today: Hour Mins (please use 24 hour clock) Q. What type of ticket did you use for this journey? (please tick one box only) A free pass or free journey Elderly person s pass... Disabled person s pass... Complimentary/free ticket... Single/return tickets Standard single ticket... Standard return ticket... Other ticket Park and Ride... Other... Q4. How did you buy that ticket or pass? From the conductor today... From a conductor before today... Direct from the company (website/phone)... At the stop... Travel Shop... Period Tickets only (Metro Card) 1 day... 1 week... 4 weeks/1 month... 1 year... + other mode of transport (e.g. plus train/bus n network/n bus) 1 day... 1 week... 4 weeks/1 month... 1 year... Rail/bus company... From a local shop or post office... You had a free pass... Direct debit through work/college... Other... Q. In what format was your ticket? A standard paper ticket/pass... A photo card ticket/pass you showed the Conductor... A plastic card you touched on to the fare machine... Q. What is the main purpose of your journey today? Travelling to/from work... Travelling to/from education (e.g. college, school)... Shopping trip... A ticket sent to your mobile phone which you showed the conductor... Other format... Visiting friends or relatives... Leisure trip (e.g. day out)... Other... Q7. Were you on your outward or return journey when you were given a questionnaire? Outward... One way trip only... Return... Q. Were you.. (please tick all thatapply) apply) Travelling with children aged 0 4... Travelling with children aged 10... Travelling with children aged 11 1... Q9. Were you travelling today with? (please tick all that apply) Children in a buggy or pushchair... A wheelchair... A carer... Q10. How did you get to the stop where you boarded this today? On foot/walked... Cycled... Motorbike... Car dropped off... Car and used Park and Ride... Car parked elsewhere... Taxi... Travelling with other adults aged 1+... Travelling alone... Lots of bags or luggage... A bicycle... /coach... Train... Other... None of these... Q11. Which method of transport, did you use when you got off this today? On foot/walked... Cycled... Motorbike... Car picked up... Car and used Park and Ride... Car parked elsewhere... Taxi... Q12. What was the main reason you chose to take the for this journey? (please tick one box only) Cheaper than the car... Cheaper than other transport... More convenient than the car (e.g. parking)... Didn t have the option of travelling by another means... Q1. What was the weather like when you made your journey, was it? Dry... Light rain... /coach... Train... Other... None of these... Quicker than other transport... Best way to get where I am going... more comfortable than other transport... Prefer to walking/cycling... Other (please specify)... Heavy rain... Snow... 9

Questionnaire (2/4) Q14. Thinking about the stop itself, how satisfied were you with the following? Neither Don t Very Fairly satisfie d nor Fairly Very know/not satisfied satisfie d dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied relevant Its distance from your journey start e.g. home, shops... The convenience/accessibility of its location within that road/street... Its general condition/standard of maintenance... Its freedom from graffiti/vandalism... Its freedom from litter... The information provided at the stop... Your personal safety whilst at the stop... Q1a. Overall, how satisfied were you with the stop? Very satisfied... Fairly dissatisfied... Fairly satisfied... Very dissatisfied... Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied... Don t know/no opinion... Q1b If you were dissatisfied with the stop: Why was this?. Waiting for the Q1. How long did you wait for your? (Please write in the time in minutes) Q17. How did you know when the was meant to arrive? From your personal copy of the timetable From the timetable at the stop... From the electronic display at the stop... Looked on the Internet... Knew the s ran frequently on this route... Q1. How long did you expect to wait for the? (Please write in the time in minutes) Q19. Thinking about the time you waited for the today, was it Much longer than expected... A little longer than you expected... About the length of time you expected... Just knew the times... Knew through other means... Did not know when the was meant to arrive... A little less time than you expected... Much less time than you expected... Q20. Were you able to board the first you wanted to travel on? Yes... No... Q21. Thinking about when the arrived, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: Neither Don t Very Fairly satisfie d nor Fairly Very know/no satisfied satisfie d dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied opinion Route/destination information on the outside of the... The cleanliness and condition of the outside of the... The ease of getting on to and off of the... The length of time it took to board the... Q22. Thinking about whilst you were on the, please indicate how satisfied you were with the following: Neither Don t Very Fairly satisfie d nor Fairly Very know/no satisfied satisfie d dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied opinion The cleanliness and condition of the inside of the... The information provided inside the... The availability of seating or space to stand... The comfort of the seats... The amount of personal space you had around you... Provision of grab rails to stand/ move within the... The temperature inside the... Your personal security whilst on the... The amount of time the journey took... Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey... Punctuality/running i on time... Q2. Did you get a seat on the? Yes for all of the journey... Yes for part of the journey... No but you were happy to stand... No but you would have liked a seat... Q24a. Did other passengers behaviour give you cause to worry or make you feel uncomfortable during your journey? Yes... No... Q24b. If yes: Which of the following were the reason(s) for this? Please tick all that apply Passengers drinking/under influence of alcohol... Passengers taking/under the influence of drugs... Abusive orthreateningbehaviour behaviour... Rowdy behaviour... Passengers not paying their fares. Feet on seats... Music being played loudly... Smoking... Graffiti or vandalism... Loud use of mobile phones... Other (specify)... 0

Questionnaire (/4) Q2a. Was your journey on the today delayed at all? Yes... No... Q2b. If yes: Why was this? Tick all that apply Congestion/traffic jams... Time it took passengers to board/ Road works/engineering works... pay for tickets... The driver driving too slowly... Other (specify) Poor weather conditions... The waiting too long at stops... Don t know... Q2 By how long was your journey today delayed? (Please write in the time in minutes) Q27. Were any of these items of information present on the? Yes A map of the route/journey times... Audio announcements e.g. saying the next stop... An electronic display e.g. showing the next stop... Information about tickets/fares... A timetable... Details of how to make a complaint, if you had one... Q2. Thinking about the staff on board the, please indicate how satisfied you were with each of the following? Neither Don t Very Fairly satisfie d nor Fairly Very know/no satisfied satisfie d dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied opinion The appearance of the staff... The greeting/welcome you got from staff... The helpfulness and attitude of the staff... The safety of the driving (i.e. appropriateness of speed, driver concentrating).... Your overall opinion of the journey Q29. Overall, taking everything into account from start to end of this journey, how satisfied were you with your journey today? Very satisfied... Fairly satisfied... Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied... No Fairly dissatisfied... Very dissatisfied... Don t know/no opinion... Q1. How satisfied were you with the value for money of your journey? Very satisfied... Fairly satisfied... Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied... Fairly dissatisfied... Very dissatisfied... Don t know/no opinion... Q2. What had the biggest influence on the value for money rating you gave in the previous question? The cost for the distance travelled... The cost of the versus other modes of transport... The fare in comparison to the cost of everyday items.... Your opinion on s generally Q. How would you rate your local services for the following: Ease of getting to local amenities (e.g. shops, hospitals, leisure facilities)... Connection with other forms of public transport (e.g. trains/buses)... Ease of buying your ticket... Punctuality (running on time)... Comfort/journey quality for the fare paid... A reason not mentioned above... Neither Very go od nor Very Not good Good poor Poor poor sure Q4. If you needed information about your local services, e.g. times, fares, where would you obtain that information? (Please tick all that apply) Phone: Traveline/Centro Hotline/Metro... Internet: Centro/Metro website... Internet: Local council website... Internet: Other travel website... Travel shop... Ask friend/relative... Ask Metro staff/ driver... Text/SMS for information... Smartphone app... Other... Not sure... Q. How often do you typically travel by? (Please tick the closest to your frequency of use) Q0. If something could have been improved on your journey today, what would it have been? or more days a week... or 4 days a week... Once or twice a week... Once a fortnight... Once a month... Less frequently... 1

Questionnaire (4/4) Q. Have any of the following frequently stopped you making journeys by? QA. The places you can reach by... The frequency of s in the area... The reliability of s... The cost of using s... Understanding di the fares... 7. About you QB. Understanding the ticket machines... How long journeys take when going by... The comfort of s... A concern for your personal safety on s... Are you Male... Female... Which age group do you fall into? 1 1... 19 2... 2 4... 44... 4 4... 9... 0 4... 79... 0+... QG. QH. In terms of being able to ask someone else to drive you for local journeys, which of the following applies? You have someone you can ask all or most of the time... You have someone you can ask some of the time... You don t have anybody you can ask... And finally, to help us get a much better picture of services at a local level, we would be grateful if you could provide the following: The first part of your post code (e.g. B2 from B2 4ND, or B19 from B19 SD) And the initial number from the second part of your post code (e.g. the 4 from B2 4ND, or the from B19 SD) QC. Are you? QD. QE. QF. Working full time (0+ hours)... Working part time (under 0 hours)... Not working seeking work... Retired... Full time student... Other... Do you have a disability or long term illness related to the following? (Tick all that apply) No None... Yes Eyesight... Yes Mobility... Yes Wheelchair use... Yes Hearing... Yes Speech impairment... Yes Learning difficulties... Yes Other... Which of the following best describes your ethnic background? White... Chinese... Mixed... Black or Black British... In terms of having a car to drive, which of the following applies? You have a car available and don t mind driving... You have ea car available aaabebut prefer not to drive... You don t have a car available... Asian or Asian British... Other ethnic group... Please complete the contact details requested below if you would be happy to participate in future research projects about travel. Name: Telephone number: Email address: Thank you for your help in completing this questionnaire. Please return it in the envelope provided or use the following Freepost address: Passenger Survey Perspective Research Services Ltd FREEPOST (RSKU SKUZ TSYG) Kingsbourne House 229 21 High Holborn LONDON WC1V 7DA This survey is being under take n for Passenger Focus by BDRC Continental, an independent ma rket research agency who adhere to the Market Research Society s Code of Conduct. You were handed the quest ionna ire by an interviewer working for Perspective Research Services, a part of BDRC Continental. If you have any concerns about the bona fides of the survey itself, you can contact the Market Research Society on 000 9 9 99 or www.mrs.org.uk who will verify BDRC Continental Limited s status as a legit imate ma rket research organisation. You ma y also contact Colin Shaddick at BDRC Continental on 0207 490 910. 2

Passenger Survey (TPS) - West Midlands (Centro) pilot June 201 Contact: Keith Bailey, Research Team, Passenger Focus Fleetbank House, 2- Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y JX Tel: 000 12 022 Email: keith.bailey@passengerfocus.org.uk