Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments (I)

Similar documents
Chapter 6. CEE 320 Anne Goodchild. Spring 2008 CEE 320

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Lecture 4: Capacity and Level of Service (LoS) of Freeways Basic Segments. Prof. Responsável: Filipe Moura

MULTILANE HIGHWAYS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 21 CONTENTS

Multilane Highways. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Introduction 1

FE Review-Transportation-II. D e p a r t m e n t o f C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g U n i v e r s i t y O f M e m p h i s

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Two Lane Highways Procedures from 2000 Highway Capacity Manual

P07033 US 50 EB Weaving Analysis between El Dorado Hills and Silva Valley Ramp Metering Analysis for US 50 EB On-Ramp at Latrobe Road

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

COMPARISON OF FREE FLOW SPEED ESTIMATION MODELS

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

CDOT SPF Development and 10 Years of Application. A Practical Approach...

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 98 Frontage Road Off-Ramp. Cherokee County, SC

Level of Service Classification for Urban Heterogeneous Traffic: A Case Study of Kanapur Metropolis

Traffic Engineering Study

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

Transport Modes and Technologies A Walking Tour on Capacity, LOS. Urban Transportation Planning MIT Course 1.252j/11.

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

Appendix E TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

IMPROVING TRAVEL TIMES FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES: TRAFFIC CONTROL STRATEGIES BASED ON CONNECTED VEHICLES TECHNOLOGIES

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Interchange Operations Study MOT (I-75 & Austin Boulevard) ODOT District 7 PID 99213

Interchange Operations Study

SECTION 9 STORM SEWER INLETS

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A MINIMUM CRITERION FOR APPROACH SPACING

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Civil Engineering A CAPACITY ESTIMATION METHOD FOR TWO-LANE, TWO-WAY

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Truck Equivalence Factors for Divided, Multilane Highways in Brazil

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

2016 Congestion Report

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Access Management Standards

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

ACCIDENT MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR MEDIAN WIDTH

Measuring Autonomous Vehicle Impacts on Congested Networks Using Simulation

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Assignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances

Assessing Passenger Car Equivalency Factors for High Truck Percentages

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

Analyzing Crash Risk Using Automatic Traffic Recorder Speed Data

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

INTERURBAN ROADS. Scope of Interurban Roads. Scope of Interurban Roads. Scope of Interurban Roads

Acceleration Behavior of Drivers in a Platoon

What do autonomous vehicles mean to traffic congestion and crash? Network traffic flow modeling and simulation for autonomous vehicles

Horizontal Alignment

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Reliability Guide for the HCM Concepts & Content

MIT ICAT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n

APPENDIX C ROADWAY BEFORE-AND-AFTER STUDY

(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:10min)

Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

Transcription:

Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments (I) 1

Learn how to use the HCM procedures to determine the level of service (LOS) Become familiar with highway design capacity terminology Apply the equations and procedures for estimating speed and density to determine LOS 2

Highway Capacity Manual 2010 The Bible of traffic engineers Planning Evaluation Design 3

9.1 Freeways A freeway is a divided highway with full Access Control and two or more lanes in each direction Signalized or stop-controlled, at-grade intersections and direct access to adjacent land use are not permitted Freeway is not just fast but full access control Opposing Traffic is separated by a raised barrier, an at-grade median, or a raised traffic island The capacity of a freeway is the maximum sustainable hourly flow rate in one direction, based on the peak 15-minute rate of flow, expressed in passenger cars per hour Basic segment Influence area (reduced capacity) The points at which a basic freeway segment begins and ends depends on the current LOS 4

capacity 6

Freeways Influence areas (capacity reduction) 7

Highway Capacity Terminology and Definitions Base Conditions: Criteria that must be satisfied for a basic freeway segment to operate at its maximum capacity (i.e.: good visibility, no heavy vehicles) Free-Flow Speed: A constant value beginning at the y- intercept of each curve and extending to the breakpoint, where the mean speed diminishes Flow Rates Beyond the Breakpoint: For demand volumes beyond the breakpoint, flow rate declines in value until it reaches the capacity of the segment Computing Free-Flow Speed: Can be determined either by field measurements or by formula estimation 8

Highway Capacity Terminology and Definitions Base Conditions: Criteria that must be satisfied for a basic freeway segment to operate at its maximum capacity (i.e.: good visibility, no heavy vehicles) Free-Flow Speed: A constant value beginning at the y- intercept of each curve and extending to the breakpoint, where the mean speed diminishes Flow Rates Beyond the Breakpoint: For demand volumes beyond the breakpoint, flow rate declines in value until it reaches the capacity of the segment Computing Free-Flow Speed: Can be determined either by field measurements or by formula estimation 9

Highway Capacity Terminology and Definitions Free-Flow Speed: A constant value beginning at the y-intercept of each curve and extending to the breakpoint, where the mean speed diminishes It is typically considered the speed limit When traffic is low on the freeway, speed limit is the only restriction When traffic is high, you begin to feel the interactions with other vehicles 10

11

Pipe s model H. Rakha et al. A Comparison of the Greenshields, Pipes, and Van Aerde Car-Following and Traffic Stream Models 12

Highway Capacity Terminology and Definitions Base Conditions: Criteria that must be satisfied for a basic freeway segment to operate at its maximum capacity (i.e.: good visibility, no heavy vehicles) Free-Flow Speed: A constant value beginning at the y- intercept of each curve and extending to the breakpoint, where the mean speed diminishes Flow Rates Beyond the Breakpoint: For demand volumes beyond the breakpoint, flow rate declines in value until it reaches the capacity of the segment Computing Free-Flow Speed: Can be determined either by field measurements or by formula estimation 13

Flow Rates Beyond Break Point Equation 2015 Cengage Learnng Engineering. All Rights Reserved. 14

Highway Capacity Terminology and Definitions Base Conditions: Criteria that must be satisfied for a basic freeway segment to operate at its maximum capacity (i.e.: good visibility, no heavy vehicles) Free-Flow Speed: A constant value beginning at the y- intercept of each curve and extending to the breakpoint, where the mean speed diminishes Flow Rates Beyond the Breakpoint: For demand volumes beyond the breakpoint, flow rate declines in value until it reaches the capacity of the segment Computing Free-Flow Speed: Can be determined either by field measurements or by formula estimation 15

Free Flow Speed Computation Equation History data + regression analysis (curve fitting) 16

Free Flow Speed Computation Equation From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 17

Level of Service for Freeway Segments LOS is a qualitative measure that describes the operating conditions within a given freeway segment using density (pc/mi) as the quantitative variable and an alphabetic grading system, ranging from A to F Conveys how the density values are perceived by drivers and passengers when traveling in the traffic stream at various demand flow rates (pc/h/ln) k = q p u q p = flow rate u= Average passenger car speed mi/h (km/h) k= Density (pc/mi/ln or pc/km/ln) Note: we use different types of LOS on different types of roads (e.g., freeway vs. arterials 18

Density Ranges for each LOS 19

LOS A Levels of Service Free-flow operation LOS B Reasonably free flow Ability to maneuver is only slightly restricted Effects of minor incidents still easily absorbed

From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 LOS C Levels of Service Speeds at or near FFS Freedom to maneuver is noticeably restricted Queues may form behind any significant blockage. LOS D Speeds decline slightly with increasing flows Density increases more quickly Freedom to maneuver is more noticeably limited Minor incidents create queuing

From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Levels of Service LOS E Operation near or at capacity No usable gaps in the traffic stream Operations extremely volatile Any disruption causes queuing LOS F Breakdown in flow Queues form behind breakdown points Demand > capacity

23

Freeway Capacity Estimation Most of equations are empirical and based on regression analysis Not all have the sound math proofs We can NEVER 100% understand driver behaviors as long as human beings are involved We do not have the luxury of extensively collecting data everywhere Simple traffic models will not reflect many factors, such as truck ratio, even though they are well calibrated (e.g., 1000 cars vs. 1000 trucks) Equations must be empirically fine tuned to address these issues 24

Definitions Passenger car equivalents (PCE) Trucks and RVs behave differently Baseline is a freeway with all passenger cars Traffic is expressed in passenger cars per lane per hour (pc/ln/hr or pcplph) Driver population Non-commuters suck more at driving They may affect capacity Capacity Corresponds to LOS E and v/c = 1.0

Calculating the Flow Rate for a Basic Freeway Section q q p = PHF N f p f HV ) q q 26

Terrain Segments General terrain refers to a series of single grades that aren t too steep or too long Freeway segments are considered to be on level terrain if the combination of grades and horizontal alignment permits heavy vehicles to maintain the same speed as passenger cars. Grades are generally short and not greater than 2% If the grades and horizontal alignment causes heavy vehicles to reduce to values substantially below those of passenger cars but not to crawl speed*, the segment is considered to be on rolling terrain If heavy vehicles operate at crawl speed then the segments are in mountainous terrain *Crawl Speed: Maximum sustained speed that trucks can maintain on an extended upgrade of a given percent 27

Computation of PCE Example (Composite grade) Tables 9.4 and 9.5 are given in the next slide 28 Only suitable for less than 4% grade of all subsections and the total length is shorter than 4,000 feet

29

When any subsection s grade is more than 4% or total length is shorter than 4,000 feet We calculate the truck/bus speed when they exit the road segment Assume the truck/bus travel at the same grade Using the figure below to estimate the equivalent grade Initial speed Final speed Total Travel distance These are the empirical curves to describe truck/bus s speed changes at different grade The underlying theory is still vehicle kinematics waves but fine tuned with real-world data Because speed changes too much from subsection to the next 30

31