Tulsa Transportation Management Area Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program FFY 2022 Application Information Sponsor Location Description STP Request Other Funds Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 $3,000,000 $3,400,000 $6,400,000 Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility $90,000 $30,000 $120,000 $320,98 $80,239 $401,197 $407,038 $101,741 $08,779 $1,841,000 $614,000 $2,4,000 Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street $2,079,000 $693,000 $2,772,000 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave $97,000 $39,000 $1,32,000 Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T $1,764,308 $31,297 $2,29,60 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. $3,000,000 $,900,000 $8,900,000 City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan $2,970,000 $1,70,000 $4,40,000 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection $2,900,000 $730,000 $3,630,000 11 s $19,329,304 $14,04,277 $33,374,81 Final Application Data FY2022 Proj. Info Page 1 of 12
Eligibility Screening (1) Representative (2) TMA Region (3) Federally Classified (4) Eligible Sponsor () Resolution (6) Engineer's Estimate Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 A Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St E Yes Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street A Yes Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T E Yes Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH- 1. City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan E Yes City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection E Yes A E A E A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Principal Principal Major Collector Major Collector Minor Minor Minor Major Collector Principal Principal Principal/ Minor 11 s In order for a project to be eligible for Tulsa Urbanized Area STP funds, it must meet the following criteria: 1) The proposed project must represent at least one of the following: A) An implementation of actions from the 204 LRTP Update, B) A transportation system management (including congestion management) project, C) Transportation control measures from the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality, D) A safety or transportation enhancement project, or E) System preservation of a transportation facility (i.e., reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration and operational improvements). 2) s must be located within the Tulsa Transportation Management Area (TMA) (Attachment C). 3) Funds must be used for roads classified as Urban Collectors/s or Rural Collectors(Major)/s under the Highway Functional Classification System. (Bridges are exempt from this rule). 4) 4) The local project sponsor must be a local unit of government or instrumentality thereof (such as the Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority or ), within the Tulsa Urbanized Area (Creek County, Osage County, Rogers County, Tulsa County, Wagoner County, City of Bixby, City of Broken Arrow, City of Catoosa, City of Coweta, City of, City of Sand Springs, City of Sapulpa, or City of Tulsa) or within the Tulsa Transportation Management Area (City of Claremore, City of, City of Glenpool, City of Owasso, or the Town of Skiatook.) ) The local project sponsor must provide to an STP Resolution (Attachment A), adopted by the governing body at a public meeting, which describes the project, including the type of improvement, project location, total project cost, and source(s) of matching funds. The sample resolution may be modified to reflect specific agreements between the project sponsor and ODOT, to reflect participation in the ODOT Certification Acceptance (CA) Program, or to meet local city charter requirements. 6) The local project sponsor must provide to a preliminary cost estimate adjusted for inflation using a rate of 4% per year over four years, and with a contingency of approximately 1%,(+ or %). Cost estimates for construction projects must be submitted by a registered professional engineer, architect, or landscape architect as appropriate, licensed in the State of Oklahoma. Final Application Data FY2022 Screen Page 2 of 12
A. Travel Time Improvement All Add s receive a maximum of 30 Points; All Non- Add projects receive a maximum of 12 Points. Count Count Date Current # of Lanes Count/ Lane STP Cost/ Traffic Ratio V/C Ratio Intersection. Cost. V/C.. Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 18,098 2017 4 4,2 16.76 0.76 6 2 4 12 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 13,900 2017 4 3,47 6.47 0.2 0 6 4 10 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 7,200 Feb-19 2 3,600 44.8 0.61 0 6 4 10 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 7,200 Feb-19 2 3,600 6.3 0.61 0 4 4 8 No 8,302 Mar-17 2 4,11 221.7 0.70 0 2 4 6 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 8,302 Mar-17 2 4,11 20.42 0.70 0 2 4 6 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 24,00 2017 4 6,12 39.06 1.03 0 6 8 12 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 4,260 Nov-16 2 2,130 414.16 0.36 0 1 4 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1.,200 Jan-14 2 2,600 76.92 0.44 6 1 4 11 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 16,700 2017 4 4,17 177.84 0.70 0 2 4 6 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 44,300 2017 6 7,383 6.46 1.09 0 4 8 12 No 11 s (1). For corridor improvements, will determine if the proposed project provides relief for an existing/future congested corridor location, using volume to capacity (V/C) ratio where Level of Service C capacity is greater than 0.80. V/C Ratio 1.0 or greater - 18 points V/C Ratio 1.20 to 1.49-12 points V/C Ratio 1.00 to 1.19-8 points V/C Ratio 0.80 to 0.99-6 points V/C Ratio less than 0.80-4 points (2). will calculate the STP dollar cost per daily traffic ratio. The projects will be divided into quartiles and the first quartile will receive 4 points, the second quartile 3 points, the third quartile 2 points and the fourth quartile 1 point. 1st Quartile 0.6 6 1 point 214.14 < X < 76.92 2nd Quartile 16.76 4 2 points 141.7 < X < 214.13 3rd Quartile 236.09 2 4 points 0.7.02 < X < 141.7 4th Quartile 76.92 1 6points X < 0.6 (3). For intersection projects or corridor projects that include intersection improvements to reduce congestion add 6 points. Final Application Data FY2022 A. Travel Time Page 3 of 12
B. Safety Improvements All projects receive a maximum of 30 Points Modal Safety Roadway Safety Rail Crossing Safety No. of Crashes Date Crash Index Crash Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 3 4 0 7 117 201-2017 177 12 19 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 4 4 0 8 149 201-2017 21 16 24 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 0 3 4 7 10 201-2017 12 4 11 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 4 3 4 11 10 201-2017 12 4 1 No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 4 4 0 8 4 201-2017 76 8 16 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 4 4 0 8 4 201-2017 76 8 16 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 4 4 0 8 18 201-2017 22 8 16 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 1 4 0 0 201-2017 0 4 9 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 4 4 4 12 1 201-2017 26 8 20 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 4 4 0 8 106 201-2017 173 16 24 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 4 4 0 8 0 201-2017 76 12 20 No 11 s The projects will be divided into quartiles based on the Accident Severity Index and the first quartile will receive 16 points, the second quartile 12 points, the third quartile 8 points and the fourth quartile 4 points. 4th Quartile 17.00 4 X<17 3rd Quartile 76.00 8 17<X<76 2nd Quartile 124.0 12 76<X<124. 1st Quartile 21.00 16 124.<X<21 Evaluation Criteria s targeting to include transit, pedestrian, bicycle & wheelchair traffic safety. Ex: signalized crossings, high visibility markings, signage, crosswalk upgrades, sidewalk extensions, pedestrian ramps, lighting, barriers separating vehicle/person conflicts. (List each item that is a part of the design separately to receive 1 point each, up to 4 points total.) s to improve roadway safety and/or address Traffic Incident management. Ex: pavement markings, lighting, signage, barriers or increase skid resistance, responder safety, equipment, communication systems, design features such as incident detection/synchronized signals (List each item that is a part of the design separately to receive 1 point each, up to 4 points total.) Points 4 4 increases safety through rail crossing improvements. 4 Final Application Data FY2022 B. Safety Page 4 of 12
C. System Maintenance and Management All Add s receive a maximum of Zero (0) Points; All Non- Add projects receive a Maximum of 20 points. Substantial Maintenance Improvements TIM and ITS Bridge CMP and Higher Class Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 0 0 10 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 0 0 0 0 0 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 0 0 0 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 0 0 0 No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 0 10 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 0 0 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 0 0 0 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 0 0 10 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 0 0 0 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 0 0 0 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 0 0 0 No 11 s Evaluation Criteria includes either resurfacing or rehabilitation of a majority of the extent, substantial drainage improvements, improvement of signalization, and/or installation or replacement of signage on existing road. aids in the detection and clearance of non-recurring traffic incidents, the rapid clearing of road obstructions, or otherwise contributes to or utilizes ITS technology or incident management elements. includes replacement or rehabilitation of a functionally obsolete or structurally deficient bridge. Points is derived from or related to the Congestion Management System and reduces congestion on streets or intersections functionally classified by the FHWA as arterials in incorporated areas or as a major rural collectors in unincorporated areas. Final Application Data FY2022 C. System Maintenance Page of 12
D. Preparation projects receive max of 20 points & Non- projects receive a maximum of 8 points Env. Review Design Status RoW Status Utility Relocation Matching Funds Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 0 4 3 0 6 13 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 4 4 8 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 0 4 0 8 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 6 3 0 4 8 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 6 3 0 4 8 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 0 4 8 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 4 0 8 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 6 3 3 6 20 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 0 4 0 4 8 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 0 6 0 4 8 No 11 s s will receive one negative point for each year and for each project the sponsor has a previously-selected project that has not been scheduled to let to bid. Evaluation Criteria What is the status of the environmental review process? Environmental clearance completed and federal approval obtained Environmental clearance in process in compliance with federal requirements Environmental clearance has not been initiated EIS likely to be required What is the status of proposed project design/ engineering/ planning? Final Design/ Engineering/ planning completed and approved by ODOT Preliminary Design/ Engineering 0% plans completed. Preliminary Design/ Engineering/ Planning design consultant selected per ODOT approved What is the status of right-of-way acquisition? Right-of-way acquisition completed or not required per ODOT approved plans. Right-of-way acquisition based on area is 0% complete Right-of-way has not been initiated What is the status of utility relocation Utility relocation completed or not required per ODOT approved plans. Utility relocation is 0% complete Utility relocation has not been initiated What is the amount of matching funds? More than 0% (6pts), 2-0% (4pts) Pt 2 0-4 10 6 4 3 0 3 0 4 to 6 Final Application Data FY2022 D. Preparation Page 6 of 12
E. Livability All Add s receive a maximum of Zero (0) Points; All Non- Add projects receive a Maximum of 10 points. Alternative Mode Bus Operations Bicycle & Pedestrian Component Higher Density Displacements Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 0 0 0 0 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 0 0 10 No 0 0 0 0 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 0 0 0 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 0 0 0 10 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 0 0 0 0 0 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 0 0 0 10 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 0 0 0 10 No 11 s Evaluation Criteria Points Main purpose of project is transit facility/hardware improvement, pedestrian or bicycle components 20 If main purpose of project is not alternative mode, but it does include complementary features, please fill in below. allows for bus operations (i.e., turning radii, bus stop pad, etc ) includes pedestrian components (bumpouts, sidewalks, shelters, etc ), includes provisions for bicycles (wide shoulders, dedicated lanes, paths/trails) count each item (not a limited access facility) is primarily located in a district zoned as Commercial, Office, High-Density Single-Family Residential, or Medium-Density Multi- Family. displaces one or more homes, businesses, schools, churches or recreational areas. -2 Final Application Data FY2022 E. Livability Page 7 of 12
F. Freight Movement and Intermodal Linkages All projects receive a maximum of 10 Points Intermodal Terminal Access Truck Volume Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 0 0 0 0 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 0 0 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 0 0 0 0 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 0 0 0 0 No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 0 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 10 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 0 0 0 0 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 0 0 0 0 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH- 1. 0 0 0 0 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 0 0 0 0 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 0 0 0 0 No 11 s Evaluation Criteria facilitates the exchange of passengers and goods from private to public modes or between transportation modes. improves access to existing or proposed terminal facility improves road component(s) with % or more heavy duty trucks by traffic volume Points Final Application Data FY2022 F. Freight and Intermodal Page 8 of 12
G. Regional Economic Benefits All projects receive a maximum of 10 Points Multi- Jurisdictional System Goals Roadway Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 0 Yes Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 10 No Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 0 0 0 No Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 0 0 0 No Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 0 0 No Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 0 0 No Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 0 No Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 10 No Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 0 Yes City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 0 No City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 0 No 11 s Evaluation Criteria is multi-jurisdictional, and is a part of a regional funding program or economic development strategy that benefits more than one community and/or county will fulfill the goal of (a) Intelligent Transportation System; (b) Incident Management; (c) Traffic flow improvement; (d) System preservation funding goal Points Final Application Data FY2022 G. Regl Econ Benefits Page 9 of 12
Point s Maximum of 100 Points G. Reg'l Economic Benefits F. Freight and Intermodal E. Livability D. Preparation C. System Maintenance B. Safety Improvements A. Travel Time Improvements Possible Points (Add Cap) 30 30 0 20 0 10 10 Possible Points (Non Cap) 20 30 20 8 20 10 10 Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 12 19 10 13 0 0 9 Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 10 24 0 8 0 10 7 Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 10 11 8 0 0 39 Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 8 1 0 10 0 0 38 Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 6 16 10 8 0 0 Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 6 16 8 10 0 0 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 12 16 8 10 0 6 Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 9 10 8 0 0 10 42 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 11 20 0 20 0 0 6 City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 6 24 8 10 0 8 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 12 20 8 10 0 60 11 s Final Application Data FY2022 s Page 10 of 12
Ranking Rank Sponsor Points STP Request Cumulative STP Funds Set Asides 1 Gilcrease West Expressway Edison to I-44: Approved for Garvee funding by Board GARVEE $6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 Requested s 1 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection 60 $2,900,000 $8,900,000 2 Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH-1 9 $3,000,000 $11,900,000 3 City of Tulsa 21st Street from Yale to Sheridan 8 $2,970,000 $14,870,000 4 Bixby Hwy 67 Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study 7 $90,000 $14,960,000 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave 6 $97,000 $1,917,000 6 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 6 $3,000,000 $18,917,000 7 Elwood2: from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility 0 $1,841,000 $20,78,000 8 Elwood3: from Main to 101st Street 0 $2,079,000 $22,837,000 9 Sand Springs SH-97T: US-64/412 & SH-97 T 42 $1,764,308 $24,601,308 10 Broadway Street Overlay from th to 19th St 39 $320,98 $24,922,266 11 Broadway Street Reconstruction from th St to 19th St (Design) 38 $407,038 $2,329,304 Final Application Data FY2022 Ranking Page 11 of 12
Proposed Program for FFY 2022 Sponsor Description Federal Local Federal Cumulative Gilcrease West Expressway Engineering design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and construction from Edison Street to I- 44 $6,000,000 $1,00,000 $7,00,000 $6,000,000 City of Tulsa 71st St & S Sheridan Intersection Intersection Rehabilitation $2,900,000 $730,000 $3,630,000 $8,900,000 Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha to SH- 1 Widen Elm Place and Rehabilitation of Intersection $3,000,000 $3,400,000 $6,400,000 $11,900,000 Bixby Highway 67 Corridor Traffic Study Corridor Traffic and Accessibility Study $90,000 $30,000 $120,000 $11,990,000 Owasso E 86th Street from 118th E Ave to 128th E Ave Street Rehabiliation $97,000 $39,000 $1,32,000 $12,947,000 Wagoner County 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. 101st Street: 209th E Ave to Oneta Road/SH-1. $3,000,000 $,900,000 $8,900,000 $1,947,000 Elwood Phase 2 Reconstruct from North of Polecat Creek to North of Conoco facility $1,841,000 $614,000 $2,4,000 $17,788,000 $17,788,000 $6,0,000 $19,002,000 Notes: All STP projects selected above are capped for federal funding. Any future phases or increased costs must be approved through subsequent competitive application processes. Final Application Data FY2022 Schedule Page 12 of 12