DOUBLE WISHBONE SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Similar documents
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PUSH ROD ROCKER ARM SUSPENSION USING MONO SPRING

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

MODELLING AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A GO-KART VEHICLE CHASSIS FRAME

Designing and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle

Design and optimization of Double wishbone suspension system for ATVs

Design, Modelling & Analysis of Double Wishbone Suspension System

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 5, Issue 03, 2017 ISSN (online):

DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR STEERING SYSTEM OF AN ATV

STRESS AND THERMAL ANALYSIS OF CLUTCH PLATE

KINEMATICS OF REAR SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR A BAJA ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE.

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE LEAF SPRING

Design & Manufacturing of an Effective Steering System for a Formula Student Car

Design and Analysis of a Space Frame Tubular Chassis for a Formula Student car

Optimization of Seat Displacement and Settling Time of Quarter Car Model Vehicle Dynamic System Subjected to Speed Bump

Design and Analysis of Front Lower Control Arm by Using Topology Optimization

Design of Suspension and Steering system for an All-Terrain Vehicle and their Interdependence

Increase Factor of Safety of Go-Kart Chassis during Front Impact Analysis

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 10, October-2017 ISSN

Design and Analysis of a steering Rack of an ATV for different materials under static loading conditions

Simulation and Analysis of Vehicle Suspension System for Different Road Profile

Design of Formula SAE Suspension

Comparative study between double wish-bone and macpherson suspension system

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF IC ENGINE GO-KART

ISSN: [Patil et al., 5(10): October, 2016] Impact Factor: 4.116

Design And Analysis Of Two Wheeler Front Wheel Under Critical Load Conditions

Study on Dynamic Behaviour of Wishbone Suspension System

Comparison Of Multibody Dynamic Analysis Of Double Wishbone Suspension Using Simmechanics And FEA Approach

Structural Analysis of Student Formula Race Car Chassis

Design, analysis and mounting implementation of lateral leaf spring in double wishbone suspension system

STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF CONNECTING ROD PARAMETERS USING ANSYS

MULTI-USE FLOOR CLEANING MACHINE

Dynamic Analysis of Double Wishbone and Double Wishbone with S Link + Toe Link

STATIC AND FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING-AS A REVIEW

Design Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION OF LOWER SUSPENSION ARM OF CAR

Technical elements for minimising of vibration effects in special vehicles

A NUMERICAL APPROACH TO SUSPENSION KINETICS ANALYSIS OF FSAE CAR

New Frontier in Energy, Engineering, Environment & Science (NFEEES-2018 ) Feb

Development of Carbon Fibre Suspension Linkages for Formula Sae Vehicles

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF TUBULAR CHASSIS OF GO-KART

Semi-Active Suspension for an Automobile

MANUFACTURING OF STEERING COMPONENTS FOR A RACE CAR

MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF TWO WHEELER SUSPENSION SYSTEM

HARMONIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF GEARBOX

VEHICLE ANTI-ROLL BAR ANALYZED USING FEA TOOL ANSYS

Propeller Shaft in Automobile: Review the Allocation Procedure in Front Axle and springs

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING FOR SOLAR VEHICLE

Design and Analysis of Three Wheeled Dual Steering Vehicle

DESIGN OF A MODIFIED LEAF SPRING WITH AN INTEGRATED DAMPING SYSTEM FOR ADDED COMFORT AND LONGER LIFE

1. Rear Suspension (Multi-link Type)

Design and Optimisation of Roll Cage of a Single Seated ATV

Compelete analysis of chasis design of automobile vehicle using finite element method

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF REAR WHEEL HUB & STEERING KNUCKLE

Design and Structural Analysis of a Go-Kart Vehicle Chassis

A STUDY ON THE PROPELLER SHAFT OF CAR USING CARBON COMPOSITE FIBER FOR LIGHT WEIGHT

DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND FABRICATION OF BRAKING SYSTEM WITH REAR INBOARD BRAKES IN BAJA ATV

Design and Analysis of Multi-Link Structure For Rear Independent Suspension of Heavy Vehicle

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 3, March ISSN DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A SHOCK ABSORBER

Design and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car

Design and Optimization of Suspension System of All Terrain Vehicle

DEVELOPMENT OF A LAP-TIME SIMULATOR FOR A FSAE RACE CAR USING MULTI-BODY DYNAMIC SIMULATION APPROACH

A double-wishbone type suspension is used in the front. A multi-link type suspension is used in the rear. Tread* mm (in.) 1560 (61.

Chandra Prasad B S, Sunil S and Suresha V Asst. Professor, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, SVCE, Bengaluru

Experimental Investigation of Effects of Shock Absorber Mounting Angle on Damping Characterstics

DESIGN AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF UNDER FRAME ARRANGEMENT (UNIVERSAL HEADSTOCK) OF DUAL COUPLER FOR RAILWAY COACHES

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF THREE WHEELER AUTO CHASSIS USING ANSYS

ISSN: SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF PASSIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR DIFFERENT ROAD PROFILES WITH VARIABLE DAMPING AND STIFFNESS PARAMETERS S.

Design And Development Of Roll Cage For An All-Terrain Vehicle

NEW DESIGN AND DEVELELOPMENT OF ESKIG MOTORCYCLE

SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SPRING SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Design, Analysis &Optimization of Crankshaft Using CAE

Design and analysis of shock absorber using FEA tool

Design and Vibrational Analysis of Flexible Coupling (Pin-type)

Stress Analysis in Pulley of Stacker-Reclaimer by Using Fem Vs Analytical

ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF AIR-GAP BETWEEN INTERNAL CYLINDER AND OUTER BODY IN AUTOMOTIVE SHOCK ABSORBER

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF HYBRID VEHICLE

STUDY ON VEHICLE PULL CHARACTERISTICS ACCORDING TO TIRE TREAD PATTERN

Design, Analysis& Optimization of Truck chassis- Rail & Cross member

A REVIEW OF TWO WHEELER VEHICLES REAR SHOCK ABSORBER

Fatigue life evaluation of an Automobile Front axle

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Vehicle Space Frame with Experimental Validation

DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF HTV FUEL TANK ASSEMBLY BY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Design, Analysis and Mockup of Semi-Trailing Rear Suspension for an All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV)

Investigation of Vibration on Suspension Systems at Different Load and Operating Conditions

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COILSPRING FOR TWO AND THREE WHEELERS

Four Link Suspension For Heavy Vehicles (Replacing Leaf Spring)

[Rao, 4(7): July, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

Design and Development Of Opposite Piston Engine

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING

Passive Vibration Reduction with Silicone Springs and Dynamic Absorber

Case study on Carbon Fiber spring suspension for FORD ENDEVOUR THUNDER+

KEYWORDS: ANSYS, Clamping effects, Leaf spring, Pro-E. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research Vol, 03 Issue, 10

BIKE SPIRAL SPRING (STEEL) ANALYSIS

NASA Human Exploration Rover Design and Analysis

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A SHOCK ABSORBER Rohit Verma CADD CENTRE,AGRA

Design and Fabrication of Pneumatic Suspension System in Two Wheeler

ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TROLLEY AXLE USING ANSYS

Increase performance of all-terrain vehicle by tuning of various components

Vinayak R.Tayade 1, Prof. A. V. Patil 2. Abstract

Transcription:

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 5, May 2017, pp. 249 264 Article ID: IJMET_08_05_027 Available online at http:// http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtype=8&itype=5 ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359 IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed DOUBLE WISHBONE SUSPENSION SYSTEM B. Rohith Raju Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.L University, Green Fields, India K.P.V.S. Raja Rao Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.L University, Green Fields, India V.V Suraj Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.L University, Green Fields, India P. Ratna Prasad Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.L University, Green Fields, India ABSTRACT Suspension system plays a crucial role in the handling of the vehicle. It helps the driver to maneuver the vehicle. The main function of suspension is to make sure that the driver feels comfortable while riding the car and the forces are damped to prevent chassis from getting damaged. Suspension helps to keep the tires in contact with ground when they encounter any bump on their way. Thus suspension is used in automobiles. This paper mainly concentrates on the design of the suspension for a formula car, modifying the mounting points, analyzing of the forces which are to be damped by the suspension. Key words: Pushrods, Rocker Arms, Sprung Masses, Unsprung Masses Cite this Article: B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad, Double Wishbone Suspension System, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 2017, pp. 249-264. http:// http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtype=8&itype=5 1. INTRODUCTION In any automotive system, suspension plays a crucial role in providing comfort to the people in the automobile and protects the important parts from the shocks or the forces that act when it encounters an obstacle on its way. Suspension is a very basic system and can provide comfort to the passenger in many ways. Having sufficient pressure of air in the tires of the automobile, cushioning of the seats, padding of few components such as steering wheel provides certain resistance to the shocks that are generated. But this is not close enough to a considerable extent of http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 249 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System damping the shock generated. Hence other components such as springs are used to damp the majority portion of the shocks generated. The suspension consists of spring, dampers and links that connect the tires to the springs and dampers. When the tire hits a bump or an obstacle on road, it would be subjected to some forces, which would get transferred to the chassis if they are not damped. These forces would cause chassis a permanent damage resulting in the breakage of the metal. The loads transferred strictly depend on the sprung and unsprung mass of the vehicle. The larger the ratio of sprung mass to that of the unsprung mass, the more stable the vehicle would be. The main functions of the suspension system are as follows: 1. It helps to keep the tires in contact with the road. 2. Prevents damage to the chassis if any sudden forces are encountered. 3. Provides comfort to the driver 4. Supports the weight of the vehicle. 2. SELECTION OF THE SUSPENSION SYSTEM Since the suspension we are about to design is used for formula1 cars, out of many suspensions, we choose double wishbone suspension system. The below are the following reasons for which double wishbone suspension system is selected: 1. It provides a less ride height which is an essential feature for a formula car. 2. Flexibility ( in terms of wheel alignment i.e., setting of camber angle) 3. Less cost 4. Load bearing capacity of the system. 5. Availability of components in local market. 3. MATERIAL SELECTION The most important part in designing and manufacturing of any component is the selection of the material. As this car is fabricated as per the rules mentioned in the rule book, we must follow few regulations laid by SAE. After the designing of the suspension system (geometry) the material selection is done. Few factors that are to be considered in the selection of material are as follows: 1. Availability 2. Cost of the material 3. Density of the material 4. Yield strength of the material 5. Bending strength of the material 6. Weight of the material etc. In the rule book it is mentioned that the material used must be LESS WEIGHT and MORE STRONG. Hence chromoly can be selected as the best material for use. Each and every part of the suspension system is made up of different materials. The following gives the details of the material used in different components of the suspension system: http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 250 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad 1. The rocker arms are made up of aluminum. 2. Push rods are made up of mild steel 3. Springs are made up of chrome steel 4. Caps are made up of aluminum 5. Adjustable column is made up of aluminum Few important properties of different materials available in market are mentioned in the table 1.1: Table 1.1 parameters of different materials Parameters Chromoly 4130 1018 steel T6 6061 aluminum Yield strength(ksi) 63.1 53.7 40 Bending stiffness(lb x in 2) 829898.26 829898.26 279430 Bending strength(lb x in) 3526.369057 3001.07 2237.13 Density(g/cm 3) 7.85 7.87 2.70 Cost per feet 162Rs/ft 60Rs/ft 200Rs/ft The table 1.1 is made by considering the material dimension of 1 inch X 0.095 inch. 4. RATING OF THE MATERIAL Generally a rating is given to any material depending on various parameters for the selected material. The overall rating is for 25 points. The above 3 materials are rated in the table 1.2: Table 1.2 rating of different materials Parameters Chromoly 4130 1018 steel T6 6061 Aluminum Yield strength 5 4 3 Manufacturability 5 5 4 Bending strength 5 4 2 weight 3 3 5 cost 3 5 2 Total 21 20 15 As rated in the table 1.2, chromoly and 1018 steel are almost close, but with a minor difference in bending strength. Hence, we consider chromoly 4130 for the fabrication of A-arms of the suspension system. The next important factor which we need to consider while fabricating is the selection of the thickness of the material. The following graphs show different factors for different thickness of the materials: http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 251 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System 3950000 3450000 2950000 2450000 1950000 1450000 950000 450000 Bending Stiffness(lb X in 2 ) vs Thickness(in) dia1 Dia1.125 Dia1.25 Dia 1.375 Dia 1.5 Reference Figure 1.1 Graph showing bending stiffness vs. thickness The above graph fig: 1.1 shows the bending stiffness of chromoly 4130 at different cross sections and at various thicknesses. 2 Weight(lb/ft) vs thickness(in) 1.5 1 Dia1 Dia1.125 0.5 0 0.058 0.065 0.083 0.095 0.12 0.125 Figure 1.2 graph showing weight vs. thickness The above graph fig: 1.2 shows density of chromoly 4130 at variable thickness and at various diameters. Bending strength(lb*in) vs Thickness(in) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Dia1 Dia1.125 Dia1.25 Dia1.375 Dia1.5 reference Figure 1.3 graph showing bending strength vs. thickness http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 252 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad The above graph Fig: 1.3 shows the bending strength of the material chromoly 4130 at different thickness and at different diameters. 5. ANALYSING THE MASSES After the selection of materials the next important task is the analyzing the weights on the suspension components. The masses in the system can be divided into 2 types. They are: Sprung masses and Unsprung masses. Sprung masses: sprung masses can be defined as the mass of the components of the body that are supported by the springs of the system. Unsprung masses: unsprung masses are the masses that move with the body (i.e. while travelling over bumps or any irregular surface). Generally these include the weights of tires, hubs, uprights etc. Generally the components that are considered to be on the sprung masses are protected from sudden shocks and loads. These are considered not to take any shocks or minimum shocks. Components like frame of the body, drive train and its components etc. can be considered as sprung masses. The sprung masses are more important when it comes to stability. As the sprung mass increases, the stability of the vehicle increases. Hence when we try to divide the masses, we almost try to maximize the sprung mass so that the vehicle would be as stable as possible. For the suspension system we are about to create, the masses are as follows: Sprung Mass front = 96kg Sprung Mass rear=144kg These masses include the masses of all the components that are supported by the springs. 6. DESIGN OF THE COMPONENTS After deciding the sprung and unsprung masses, the next task comes to the design of the components. The designing of the components is done by following few rules and regulation that are described in the rule book. Among all the rules that are mentioned in the rule book, the important rule that we consider in designing is that there must be a jounce and rejounce of spring that must be maximum of 1 inch. Few other rule about ground clearance, wheel base etc., are considered. The main components of the suspension are: A-Arms Push rods Rocker arms Springs with dampers As we all know the mechanism, if the automobile faces any sudden load (bump on the road), then the load is transferred to A-arms from tires, then to push rods, to rocker arms and finally to the damper where the shock will be damped. The design of all the components should be in such a way that they take up the loads without getting failed. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 253 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System We use solid works software, for the modeling of the components. Solid works is one of the famous modeling software that is used in the designing process. The designed components of the suspension system are as follows: 6.1. A-Arms A- Arms can be termed as the starting part of the suspension system, from where the load transferring takes place. These components hold the wheels of the automobile and are attached to the chassis. When the automobile is subjected to any sudden obstacles, these will the first component which is used to transfer the shock to the damping system. The following are the designed components of suspension system: 6.2. Spring Spring is one of the main components in the suspension system. Without these, the suspension will be incomplete. Springs take the forces that are generated and damp them. The spring material is made up of chrome silicon. The following are the details of the springs: Spring Material=Chrome Silicon Spring Stiffness=30N/mm^2 Spring wire diameter (d) =4.4mm Spring outer diameter (D) =65mm Pitch=12mm Total Length I to I=11inch Number of Active coils=8 Figure 3.0 spring The Fig: 3.0 represent a model of sprig which is used in the suspension system designed. Spring is not a single component. It is an assembly which consists of different parts. One of the most important components is damper. The spring is mounted on the damper and is fixed with the caps. The below diagrams shows the design of damper. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 254 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2 Figure 3.3 Fig 3.1, Fig 3.2, Fig 3.3, describes the components which are used for the mounting of springs and shock absorbers. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 255 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System Here the damper travel is considered to be 5cms. Fig: 3.4 represent a shock absorber. Figure 3.4 shock absorber Figure 3.5 spring with caps on both sides Fig: 3.5 represent a spring with caps installed on both sides of it. Figure 3.6 final assembly of spring Fig: 3.6 represent the entire spring assembly. Without push rods, the transmission of the shock doesn t takes place. Push rods and rocker arms are the two important components that are used in transmitting the forces from one axis to another. Push rod transmits the force that is created at the tires to the rocker arm and to spring system. The motion ratio of the push rod is as follows: http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 256 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad Motion Ratio Front=0.728 Rear=0.968 Fig: 3.7 represent a model of push rod. A-Arm specifications: Material=Mild Steel AISI 1018 Outer diameter=0.8 inch. Figure 3.7 push rod Figure 3.8 front lower A-Arm Fig: 3.8 represent the A-Arms used. Rocker arm is the component on which the spring system is mounted on. This can be termed as the main component which transfers the force that is generated in an axis to another. The forces that are transmitted from the push rods are transferred to the springs by changing the direction (or can be termed as axis) of its action. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 257 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System Fig: 3.12 represent the rocker Arm used. Figure 3.12 rocker arm Figure 3.13 final assembly of the suspension system Fig: 3.13 represent the final assembly of the suspension system. As shown in the Fig: 3.14 the final rear assembly is done in such a way that the maximum space is allocated for engine, battery and fuel tank. Consideration has been taken that if any load applied, it won t be transmitted to chassis. Figure 3.14 rear assembly of suspension (rear view) Fig: 3.14 represent the final rear assembly (rear view). http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 258 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad Figure 3.15 front assembly system (top view) Fig: 3.15 represent the front assembly system. The front assembly system as shown in Fig: 3.15 are installed in such a way that it accommodates steering, brakes and a perfect ergonomic position for the driver s cabin. Figure 3.16 rear assembly system (top view) Fig: 3.16 represent rear assembly system (top view). 7. ANALYSIS OF THE DESIGNED COMPONENTS ANSYS is one of the most powerful tools which are used to perform analysis on the modeled objects. We used ANSYS work bench for the analysis process. Few operations such as meshing, application of loads, stresses developed and total deformation of the object can be done by using this software. 7.1. Analysis of rocker arm Rocker arm is the component which is used to transfer sudden loads or shocks from road to springs and dampers. The analysis of the component is as follows: http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 259 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System Figure 4.0 stresses developed in rocker arm The above diagram (Fig: 4.0) mentions the total stresses developed in the rocker arm. Figure 4.1 total deformation of rocker arm The above diagram (Fig: 4.1) indicates the total deformation that takes place in the rocker arm. 7.2. Analysis on brackets Brackets can be generally attached on the A-Arms for supporting of the push rods. Here, the analysis of the brackets is done. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 260 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad Figure 4.2 total deformation of brackets The above diagram (Fig: 4.2) indicates the total deformation of the brackets. Figure 4.3 applications of loads on brackets The above diagram (Fig. 4.3) indicated the direction of the loads applied. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 261 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System Figure 4.4 stresses developed in the brackets The above diagram (Fig: 4.4) indicates the stresses developed within the brackets. 7.3. Analysis on the assembly of A-Arms and brackets Since the assembly of A-Arms and brackets are the one that transfer any loads or shocks from tire to the springs and dampers, the analysis of the assembly is done. Figure 4.5 applications of loads on the brackets connected to A-Arms The above diagram (Fig: 4.5) indicates the loads applied on the assembly of A-Arms and brackets. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 262 editor@iaeme.com

B. Rohith Raju, K.P.V.S. Raja Rao, V.V Suraj and P. Ratna Prasad Figure 4.6 total deformations occurred in the brackets and A-Arms The above diagram (Fig: 4.6) indicates the total deformation that occurs. Figure 4.7 stresses developed in brackets and A-Arms The above diagram (Fig: 4.7) indicates the total stresses that are developed in the assembly. 8. ANALYSIS OF THE SPRING AND ITS MOUNTING POINTS After completion of the designing and analysis of the components, the next part is to fix the mounting points for all the components. As mentioned earlier, the entire design is done based on few rules and regulations. It will need a tremendous amount of man work if we keep on changing the mounting points until the required point is obtained and the obtained point should be according to the rule. To avoid this we use LOTUS SHARK SUSPENSION ANALYSIS, which provides us the exact dimensions where the mounting points must be installed. By using LOTUS, much iteration can be done. If there is any failure of the system, then we will be able to observe that and change the mounting points. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 263 editor@iaeme.com

Double Wishbone Suspension System The following is the design of the suspension system with the mounting points included in it: Figure 5.0 final mounting points of the suspension system Fig: 5.0 represent the final mounting points on the vehicle. 9. CONCLUSION Thus by the usage of double wishbone suspension system, we can obtain required ground clearance, caster and camber angles. Hence we can rate this as the best suspension system which can be used in majority of formula cars. REFERENCES [1] Kang HI, Kang HS. A Study on Performances of Passenger vehicle Suspension systems. Indian Journal of Science &Technology. 2015 Jan; 8(s1):1 3. [2] Vehicle active suspension system using skyhook adaptive neuro active force control. [3] MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system. [4] Optimization of Bushing stiffness Using Numerical Approximation Model to Improve Automotive. [5] Milliken and Milliken race car. [6] SAE forums. [7] FSAE forums [8] N. P. Sherje and Dr. S. V. Deshmukh, Preparation and Characterization of Magnetorheological Fluid For Damper In Automobile Suspension. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 2016, pp. 75 84. [9] Kashif Wani, Suspension Based Kinetic Energy Recovery System. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 2016, pp. 142 157. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 264 editor@iaeme.com