APPENDIX B TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Transcription

1 APPENDIX B TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

2 Submitted by: DOWNTOWN AND FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICT (TOD) CITY OF INGLEWOOD DRAFT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Submitted to: City of Inglewood June 24, 2016 J

3 Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL Document Name Submittal Date Version No. Downtown and Fairview Heights Transit Oriented District (TOD) City of Inglewood Draft Traffic Impact May 9, Analysis Downtown and Fairview Heights Transit Oriented District (TOD) City of Inglewood Draft Traffic Impact May 11, Analysis Downtown and Fairview Heights Transit Oriented District (TOD) City of Inglewood Draft Traffic Impact Analysis June 24, i Page

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Document Version Control... i Table of Contents... 1 Appendices... 2 List of Tables... 2 List of Figures Introduction PROJECT DESCRIPTION STUDY AREA STUDY PERIODS PROPOSED PROJECT Environmental Setting EXISTING CIRCULATION SYSTEM Freeway Network Arterial and Collector Network Existing Traffic Volumes EXISTING MULTIMODAL MOBILITY Truck Circulation Public Transit Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Collision History FUTURE CIRCULATION SYSTEM Freeway Network Arterial and Collector Network FUTURE MULTIMODAL MOBILITY Truck Circulation Public Transit Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Traffic Operations Analysis Methodology THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Existing Conditions Traffic Volume Development TRAVEL MODEL METHODOLOGY CUMULATIVE PROJECTS MODELED LAND USE MODEL OUTPUTS PROJECT TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Existing Plus Project Conditions EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Future Year 2035 Without Project Conditions FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Page

5 Traffic Impact Analysis Version Future Year 2035 With Project Conditions FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Freeway Ramp Queuing Analysis Congestion Management Program Analysis (CMP) CMP INTERSECTION ANALYSIS CMP MAINLINE FREEWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS CMP TRANSIT IMPACT ANALYSIS Potential Mitigation Measures Conclusions APPENDICES Appendix A: Traffic Count Data Appendix B: Volume Development Sheets Appendix C: LOS Calculation Sheets Appendix D: MUTCD Peak Hour Signal Warrant Appendix E: Freeway Ramp Queuing Calculation Sheets Appendix F: CMP Transportation Analysis Guidelines LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Proposed Project Land Use... 4 Table 2: Study Area Transit Facilities Table 3: Intersection Level Of Service Definitions ICU Methodology Table 4: Intersection Level Of Service Definitions HCM Methodology Table 5: Intersection Significant Impact Criteria Table 6: Existing Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Table 7: Cumulative Development Projects Table 8: SCAG Model Socio Economic Data (SED) Table 9: Adjusted Model Socio Economic Data (SED) Table 10: Plus Project Model Socio Economic Data (SED) Table 11: Project Trips Generated per TOD Area Table 12: Existing Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Table 13: Future Year 2035 Without Project Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Table 14: Future Year 2035 With Project Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Table 15: Ramp Intersection Queuing Lengths Table 16: CMP Intersection Analysis Table 17: Freeway Segment LOS Table 18: 2010 CMP Freeway Conditions Table 19: Future Year 2035 CMP Freeway Conditions Table 20: Transit Trips Calculations Table 21: Study Area Transit Facilities 2015 Daily Ridership Page

6 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Table 22: Future Year 2035 With Project Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Mitigated Conditions LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Study Area... 6 Figure 2: Intersection Locations... 7 Figure 3A: Downtown TOD Green Boulevards... 9 Figure 3B: Fairview Heights TOD Green Boulevards Figure 4: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Figure 5A: Downtown Truck Routes Figure 5B: Fairview Heights Truck Routes Figure 6A: Downtown Transit Facilities Figure 6B: Fairview Heights Transit Facilities Figure 7A: Downtown TOD Existing Pedestrian Facilities Figure 7B: Fairview Heights TOD Existing Pedestrian Facilities Figure 8A: Downtown TOD Existing and Proposed (General Plan Circulation Element) Bicycle Routes Figure 8B: Fairview Heights TOD Existing and Proposed (General Plan Circulation Element) Bicycle Routes Figure 9A: Downtown TOD Bicycle and Pedestrian Related Collisions Figure 9B: Fairview Heights TOD Bicycle and Pedestrian Related Collisions Figure 10A: Downtown TOD Proposed Bicycle Facilities (LRT Bicycle Planning Study) Figure 10B: Fairview Heights TOD Proposed Bicycle Facilities (LRT Bicycle Planning Study) Figure 11: Existing Intersection Lane Configurations Figure 12: Existing Plus Project Peak hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Figure 13: Future Year 2035 Without Project Peak hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Figure 14: Future Year 2035 With Project Peak hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Page

7 1.0 INTRODUCTION Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared to identify the potential transportation impacts of the future planned developments within the Downtown and Fairview Heights Transit Oriented Districts (TOD) in the City of Inglewood. The two TODs are centered around the two new Crenshaw Boulevard/LAX Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations, as shown in Figure 1. The 8.5 mile Crenshaw/LAX Light Rail Transit (LRT), which is currently under construction, will connect the existing Exposition Line LRT and the Green Line LRT, near the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Eight new transit stations are planned, including two stations in the City of Inglewood at: Florence Avenue/La Brea Avenue and Florence Avenue/West Boulevard. The planned stations are projected to open and be operational in 2019; therefore, the two stations were included as part of the Future Year 2035 Without and With Project scenarios only. The TIA presents the results of analysis performed to evaluate existing traffic operations, and to analyze in detail the impacts of the potential future developments associated with the TOD areas for the buildout year The traffic analysis follows the City of Inglewood guidelines, the Los Angeles County Public Works 1997 Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines, the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, and the 2010 Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) guidelines. 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consist of redeveloping the TOD areas around the two new (under construction at the time of this report) Crenshaw/LAX LRT stations with mixed land use patterns and multi modal transportation facilities. The proposed developments within the TODs, which are referred in this document as the with project scenario, are described in Table 1. Residential (units) TABLE 1: PROPOSED PROJECT LAND USE Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Hotel (rooms) Institutional (s.f.) Industrial & Industrial/Creative Office (s.f.) Downtown Existing Development 4, , , , ,535 Future Demolition ,549 81, , ,337 Future Development 2, , , ,248,476 Development at Buildout 6,793 1,116,485 1,113, ,099 1,744,674 Fairview Heights Existing Development 1,467 57,505 43,035 18,738 77,944 Future Demolition 4 12,129 41,214 1,710 70,950 Future Development ,011 4, ,977 Development at Buildout 1,681 64,387 6, ,005 7,354 Project Total Existing Development 5,781 1,031, , , ,479 Future Demolition , , , ,927 Future Development 2, , , ,977 1,248,476 Development at Buildout 8,474 1,230,872 1,120, ,104 1,752,029 4 Page

8 Traffic Impact Analysis Version STUDY AREA The traffic impact study area was defined in consultation with the City of Inglewood. The study area consists of intersections that are considered to potentially be impacted as a result of traffic related to TOD land uses. The study area includes the following twenty nine (29) intersections, which were selected along arterials that provide primary access and circulation to the two TOD areas: 1. Inglewood Avenue/Hyde Park Boulevard 2. Inglewood Avenue/Florence Avenue 3. Inglewood Avenue/Manchester Boulevard 4. Eucalyptus Avenue/Hyde Park Boulevard 5. Eucalyptus Avenue/Juniper Street 6. Eucalyptus Avenue/Beach Avenue 7. Eucalyptus Avenue/Florence Avenue 8. Hyde Park Boulevard/Juniper Street/La Brea Avenue 9. Fir Avenue/Florence Avenue 10. La Brea Avenue/Beach Avenue 11. La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue 12. La Brea Avenue/Regent Street 13. La Brea Avenue/Manchester Boulevard 14. Market Street/Florence Avenue 15. Market Street/Regent Street 16. Market Street/Manchester Boulevard 17. Locust Street/Florence Avenue 18. Hillcrest Boulevard/Florence Avenue 19. Hillcrest Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard 20. Centinela Avenue/Florence Avenue 21. Prairie Avenue/Florence Avenue 22. Prairie Avenue/Grace Avenue 23. Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard 24. West Boulevard/Redondo Boulevard 25. West Boulevard/Florence Avenue 26. Crenshaw Boulevard/Florence Avenue 27. Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard 28. La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue 29. I 405NB Ramps/Manchester Boulevard The locations of the study intersections are illustrated in Figure STUDY PERIODS Traffic operations were evaluated for each of the following scenarios during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours: Existing (2015) Conditions: The existing conditions analysis is based on new traffic count data collected at the study intersections and count data provided by the City of Inglewood. Existing (2015) Plus Project Conditions: The existing plus project conditions analysis is based on the existing traffic conditions plus the traffic expected to be generated from the buildout of the TOD. The two Crenshaw stations are not included in the analysis because the expected opening year is Future Year 2035 Without Project Conditions: The future year conditions analysis is based on the future traffic conditions expected without the proposed project. The future traffic growth from regional ambient growth and cumulative projects is included, and the two Crenshaw LRT stations are included in the analysis because the expected opening year is Future Year 2035 With Project Conditions: The future year with project conditions analysis is based on the future without project as a baseline and adds the project trips expected to be generated by the planned TOD land uses. The two Crenshaw LRT stations are included in the analysis because the expected opening year is Page

9 West Blvd Centinela A ve Blv Inglewood Ave h Av e Florence Ave ce en lor e Av F el La z Ha Crenshaw Blvd ac Market St Cedar St d Hy Be La Cienega Blvd LOS ANGELES d rk a ep St ea Br vd Prairie Ave 8th Ave Crenshaw Blvd H illc re Manchester Blvd Kelso St Market St 405 Manchester Dr st Bl La Brea Ave Hillcrest Blvd Legend Crenshaw Line Station Crenshaw Line Eucalyptus Ave Manchester Ter Inlgewood Ave Cedar Ave La Cienega Blvd Oak St Manchester Blvd Crenshaw Dr Market St Locust St Regent St West Blvd Prairie Ave F Fir Ave Hyde Park Blvd e Av ve ea nc lore INGLEWOOD Downtown TOD Study Area West Boulevard (Florence/West) TOD Study Area 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet Transit Oriented District Development City of City of Inglewood Inglewood City of Inglewood Figure 1 Study Area

10 West Blvd Centinela A ve Inlgewood Ave h Av e ce en lor (4 (8 (5 el La z Ha St 21 ( ea Br e Av ( 20 ( ( Florence Ave e Av F (1 22 ( 23 ( 8th Ave West Blvd Manchester Blvd 27 ( Crenshaw Blvd vd re st Manchester Dr Kelso St Market St Manchester Ter ( Bl La Brea Ave Eucalyptus Ave Hillcrest Blvd Crenshaw Dr ( ( (3 Inlgewood Ave La Cienega Blvd Cedar Ave Manchester Blvd Oak St 29 ( Prairie Ave Fir Ave 28 ( Locust St (9 Regent St Market St F (7 illc (2 ve ea nc lore 10 ( 14 ( 11 ( ( ( Prairie Ave 17 ( H Hyde Park Blvd 25 ( Crenshaw Blvd ac 24 ( Market St Cedar St Be La Cienega Blvd Blv d Hy (6 Legend ( Study Intersections Crenshaw Line Station Crenshaw Line LOS ANGELES d rk a ep INGLEWOOD Downtown TOD Study Area West Boulevard (Florence/West) TOD Study Area 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet Transit Oriented District Development City City of of Inglewood Inglewood City of Inglewood Figure 2 Intersection Locations

11 Traffic Impact Analysis Version PROPOSED PROJECT This section describes the transportation characteristics of the proposed project and the project traffic generation methodology.the Downtown and Fairview Heights TODs would offer increased mobility for all modes of transportations, including: Roadway System Configurations: the existing street system would maintain the current configuration with the exception of Market Street between Florence Avenue and Regent Street. This segment of Market Street will be closed to vehicular traffic to accommodate for the proposed North Market Place. Green Boulevards: Figure 3A and Figure 3B illustrate the proposed Complete Streets, within the study area these streets are labeled Green Boulevards and consist of wide sidewalks, protected bicycle lanes and cycletracks, landscaped buffers between bicycle lanes and travel lanes and raised medians to provide pedestrian refuge. Complete Streets provide the ultimate balance between all modes of transportation along the corridor including passenger cars, buses, bicycles, goods movement vehicles, parking, and pedestrian activities. Complete Streets offer the residents, business community and visitors the complete range of choices for mobility within the project area. 8 Page

12 Hillcrest Blvd Prairie Ave Locust St Market St Grevillea Avenue Fir Avenue Park Avenue 23,400 Centinela Ave La Brea Ave Exton Ave 27,000 Centinela Ave Edgewood St Market St Warren Ln Florence Ave 21,700 Eucalyptus Avenue La Brea Ave Beach Avenue Beach Avenue 18,500 20,700 23,700 Florence Ave Regent Street Queen Street Manchester Boulevard 27,500 24,500 2,800 Legend Eucalyptus Avenue La Brea Ave Hillcrest Blvd 25,400 26,700 Florence/La Brea Station Crenshaw Line XX Potential Complete Streets Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Study Area Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ADT Source: 2010 City of Inglewood Traffic Count Volume Map Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood ,000 1,500 Feet Figure 3A Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Downtown Green Boulevards USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

13 63th St Fairview Blvd West Blvd Hyde Park Blvd Crenshaw Blvd Hyde Park Blvd 7,100 67th St Redondo Blvd Florence Ave 21,700 Florence Ave 37,000 2,000 20,700 Prairie Ave West Blvd Crenshaw Blvd Legend Florence/West Station Crenshaw Line XX Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area Potential Complete Streets Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ADT Source: 2010 City of Inglewood Traffic Count Volume Map Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood ,000 1,500 Feet Figure 3B Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Fairview Heights Green Boulevards USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

14 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 This section presents an overview of the existing roadway and transit system within the study area, and the methodology used to determine existing traffic volumes. 2.1 EXISTING CIRCULATION SYSTEM This section presents an overview of the existing freeway and arterial network within each TOD study area, and indicastes whether they are part of the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) network. The CMP network is comprised of a specific system of arterial roadways plus all freeways in Los Angeles County, as established by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) FREEWAY NETWORK The following is a description of the freeway network that provides regional access to the study area. All freeways near the study area are part of the CMP network. I 405 (San Diego Freeway) is a major north south freeway that runs along the western edge of Inglewood. I 405 connects the San Fernando Valley to Orange County by traversing western Los Angeles. I 405 through Inglewood varies between four and five lanes in each direction with several sections having auxiliary lanes between successive on and off ramps. Access to I 405 from Florence Avenue is provided by an atypical interchange, with only a southbound off ramp connecting to Florence Avenue at La Cienega Boulevard. La Cienega Boulevard south of Industrial Avenue splits into one way segments in each direction that cross over I 405 and merge at Florence Avenue. The southbound segment merges with the southbound freeway on and off ramps before intersecting Florence Avenue. The northbound segment of La Cienega Boulevard merges with the northbound off ramp (which begins south of Manchester Boulevard) before intersecting Industrial Avenue. I 105 (Glenn Anderson Freeway & Transitway) is an east west freeway that runs along the southern edge of Inglewood. I 105 consists of one HOV lane and three general purpose traffic lanes in each direction. The Metro Green Line LRT route is located within the median of I ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR NETWORK A brief description of each roadway type, as defined in the City of Inglewood 1992 General Plan, is provided below: A Major Arterial functions primarily as an inter city route that is generally designed to carry over 30,000 vehicles per day. Major arterials typically have a minimum of two full time through lanes in each direction in addition to a separate median lane (raised or painted) to accommodate left turn movements. A Minor Arterial functions in a similar mannar as a major arterial, but may be discontinuous within the City, and is generally designed to carry 15,000 to 30,000 vehicles per day. Minor arterials typically have a minimum of two travel lanes in each direction, and maintain a separate (generally painted) median lane to accommodate left turn movement if there is sufficient roadway width. A Collector functions as a transitional street between arterials and local streets, and is generally designed to carry 3,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day. Collectors typically have at least one travel lane in each direction. 11 Page

15 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 The existing configurations of the roadways within the study area are described below: Beach Avenue runs in an east west orientation north of Florence Avenue between Plymouth Street and Centinela Avenue. It is designated as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. The avenue consists of one travel lane in each direction, with on street parking on both sides. The speed limit is established as 30 mph. Centinela Avenue runs in a north south orientation in the project area beginning at Florence Avenue and continuing north through Hyde Park Boulevard, where it curves to the west and runs in an east west direction through La Cienega Boulevard and continues through the west under I 405. Centinela Avenue is classified as a major arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element and consists of two travel lanes in each direction. There is on street parking on both sides within the project area. The speed limit is established as 40 mph. Crenshaw Boulevard lies to the east of the project area and runs in a north south orientation with three travel lanes in each direction. Crenshaw Boulevard is classified as a major arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. Crenshaw Boulevard provides a direction to I 105 on the southern edge of Inglewood, and to I 10 north of the City. There is on street parking on both sides of the boulevard within the project area. The speed limit is established as 35 mph. Eucalyptus Avenue lies west of La Brea Avenue and runs in a north south orientation for the entire length of the city limits with one travel lane in each direction. Eucalyptus Avenue is classified as a minor arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. There is on street parking in the project area south of Manchester Boulevard, and limited parking in certain segments north of Manchester Boulevard. The speed limit is established as 30 mph. Fairview Boulevard runs in an east west orientation, joining Hyde Park Boulevard on the east. The portion of the boulevard within the project area is designated as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. The boulevard consists of one travel lane in each direction, with on street parking on both sides. The speed limit is established as 25 mph. Fir Avenue is located west of La Brea Avenue in a north south orientation, beginning at Florence Avenue and terminating at Manchester Boulevard, with one travel lane in each direction. Fir Avenue is classified as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. Fir Avenue provides on street parking on most segments. The speed limit is established as 25 mph. Florence Avenue traverses the project area in an east west orientation with two travel lanes in each direction. There is also a bike lane in each direction between Locust Street and Redondo Boulevard. Florence Avenue is classified as a major arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element and provides an east west connection from I 110 through Inglewood to I 405. There is no on street parking in the project area, and Florence Avenue is part of the County s CMP network. The designated speed limit is established as 40 mph. Grace Avenue runs in an east west orientation between Locust Street and Hillcrest Boulevard, and is designated as a local street. Grace Avenue consists of one travel lane in each direction, with parallel on street parking on the north and southeastern side and angled on street parking in the southwestern portion of the street. The speed limit is established as 25 mph. Hillcrest Boulevard has a north south orientation and is classified as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element that serves to connect Florence Avenue to Manchester 12 Page

16 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Boulevard. Hillcrest Boulevard has one travel lane in each direction and has parking on both sides. The speed limit is established as 30 mph. Hyde Park Boulevard runs in an east west orientation north of Florence Avenue. It is designated as a collector in the City s General Plan. Hyde Park Boulevard consists of one travel lane in each direction, with on street parking on both sides. The speed limit is established as 30 mph. Inglewood Avenue has a north south orientation and is classified as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. Inglewood Avenue has one travel lane in each direction and provides on street parking on both sides. Juniper Street has an east west orientation and is classified as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element, connecting Eucalyptus Avenue to La Brea Avenue and Hyde Park Boulevard. The street has one travel lane in each direction and provides on street parking on both sides. La Brea Avenue traverses the project area in a north south orientation with two travel lanes in each direction. La Brea Avenue is classified as a major arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element and provides the project area with access to I 10 and Mid City, and connects to Hawthorne Boulevard and links up to I 105. There is on street parking on both sides of La Brea Avenue within the project area. The speed limit is established as 35 mph. Locust Street runs in a north south orientation between Florence Avenue and Nutwood Street/Hillcrest Boulevard Locust Street is classified as a local street north of Regent Street, and as a collector south of Regent Street. There is one travel lane and one bike lane in each direction, with on street parking on both sides of the street. The speed limit is established as 30 mph. Manchester Boulevard runs in an east west orientation with two travel lanes in the westward direction and two travel lanes west of Hillcrest Boulevard and three travel lanes east of Hillcrest Boulevard in the eastward direction. Manchester Boulevard is classified as a major arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element and provides an east west connection from I 110 through the heart of Inglewood and continues west to Playa Del Rey. Manchester Boulevard passes by multiple key locations in the study area including the Inglewood Park Cemetery, The Forum, and Inglewood High School. There is on street parking on both sides of the boulevard within the project area. Manchester Boulevard is part of the CMP network. The speed limit is established as 35 mph. Market Street begins east of La Brea Avenue at Florence Avenue, and meets La Brea Avenue further south. Market Street is classified as a minor arterial according to the City s General Plan Circulation Element. There is one travel lane in each direction with a median lane to accommodate left turn movements. There is also a mixture of parallel and angled street parking along both sides of the street. The speed limit is established as 25 mph. Prairie Avenue is located on the eastern border of the project area between Florence Avenue and Manchester Boulevard. There are two travel lanes in each direction and is designated as a major arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. There is no on street parking available. The speed limit in the project area is established as 40 mph. Redondo Boulevard parallels a rail right of way and connects to West Boulevard. Redondo Boulevard no longer connects to Florence Avenue. Redondo Boulevard consists of one travel lane 13 Page

17 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 in each direction and there is angled parking along the southern side. The speed limit is established as 35mph. Regent Street runs in an east west orientation south of Florence Avenue. It is designated as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. Regent Street consists of one travel lane in each direction with parking on both sides of the street, with the exception of the segment between Fir Avenue and La Brea Avenue, where there are two travel lanes in each direction and no on street parking. The speed limit is established as 35 mph. Warren Lane runs in a southwest direction between Park Avenue and Centinela Avenue. Warren Lane is designated as a collector in the City s General Plan Circulation Element. Warren Lane consists of one travel lane in each direction, with parking on both sides. The speed limit is established as 25 mph. West Boulevard runs north south from Florence Avenue. West Boulevard is classified as a minor arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element, with one travel lane plus one bike lane in each direction. There is on street parking on both sides of the boulevard within the project area. The speed limit is established as 30 mph EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing (2015) traffic counts were obtained at the twenty nine (29) intersections from various sources, including the City of Inglewood. All counts were conducted during the a.m. peak period (7:00 9:00) and p.m. peak period (4:00 6:00). The traffic impact analysis is based on the highest single hour of traffic during each time period at each location. Detailed vehicle turning movement data and parking counts are included in Appendix A. Figure 4 shows the existing peak hour volumes at the study intersections. 2.2 EXISTING MULTIMODAL MOBILITY This section presents a description of existing facilities and routes that serve multimodal mobility needs within each of the TODs in the study area. The City has developed and invested in many existing transportation and mobility options including: truck routes, bus routes and stops, bicycle routes, sidewalks, and multi purpose paths TRUCK CIRCULATION The City of Inglewood s truck routes are illustrated in Figures 5A and 5B, as described in the City s Municipal Code Section Major north south routes are La Brea Avenue, Centinela Avenue, Eucalyptus Avenue, West Boulevard, and Crenshaw Boulevard. Major east west routes are Florence Avenue, Hyde Park Boulevard, and Manchester Boulevard PUBLIC TRANSIT The transit system serving the two TODs are comprised of bus services provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). Transit routes serving each study area corridor are illustrated in Figure 6A and 6B. Table 2 lists the transit lines near each study area along with descriptions and corresponding characteristics including major origin/destinations, routes, and frequencies. 14 Page

18 West Blvd Market St Inlgewood Ave St 21 ( ( Florence Ave Crenshaw Blvd Cedar St 20 ( ( 19 Manchester Ter ( illc H 23 ( Hillcrest Blvd 8th Ave Manchester Dr re st Bl La Brea Ave Eucalyptus Ave vd ( ( (3 Inlgewood Ave Cedar Ave Oak St La Cienega Blvd Manchester Blvd Manchester Blvd Market St Prairie Ave Kelso St ( Crenshaw Blvd (9 West Blvd (7 Regent St Locust St (2 nc re Flo 10 ( 14 ( 11 ( ( ( Market St ve ea Prairie Ave 17 ( Fir Ave Hyde Park Blvd 25/16 41/65 18/28 el z Ha 26 ( Crenshaw Dr 223/143 18/22 23/27 783/ /65 La Cienega Blvd (4 (8 (5 ( 29 ( 1448/ / ( ve ea c 28 ( 268/ /928 79/97 670/ /88 60/ / / /83 4/22 Legend 227/ / / / / / /782 60/ / / / Centinela Ave / Florence Ave 32/46 259/330 27/18 794/862 Av e 24 ( ren Market St / Regent St Blv Flo (6 113/ / /213 83/55 199/184 55/80 56/52 766/ /409 36/61 164/377 14/65 285/ /825 38/25 223/140 12/15 103/71 171/92 11/17 86/90 169/206 43/43 49/30 4/ /974 5/ /20 20 /8 1 / / / /171 0/5 0/8 1/18 351/ /350 52/92 100/18 707/950 44/ /43 769/871 68/16 104/45 29/30 9/5 467/293 18/18 140/65 607/ /172 17/41 69/108 18/52 h e Av 575/ / /233 ac ea 19. Hillcrest Blvd / Manchester Blvd Be 10. La Brea Ave / Beach Ave 27/22 413/159 43/28 a ep d Hy Br 18. Hillcrest Blvd / Florence Ave rk La 46/57 629/ /28 113/ / /66 57/39 114/65 86/100 18/26 73/71 42/ Market St / Florence ave 15/12 39/104 41/64 d Centinela A ve 5. Eucalyptus Ave / Juniper St 42/ /803 64/56 619/990 99/99 169/ / /607 57/49 63/ /205 56/ Locust St / Florence Ave 9. Fir Ave / Florence Ave 68/76 52/ / /203 40/27 171/88 57/ La Brea Ave / Manchester Blvd 625/ /99 70/ / /47 16/11 986/452 75/28 11/12 274/168 1/6 1331/1033 ( Study Intersections Crenshaw Line Station 27. Crenshaw Blvd / Manchester Blvd 51/ /700 26/ La Cienega Blvd / Florence Ave 19/48 608/ / / / / Crenshaw Blvd / Florence Ave 189/ / / / / / West Blvd / Florence Ave 140/ / /173 27/23 689/ / West Blvd / Redondo Blvd 87/ / /52 983/ / Prairie Ave / Manchester Blvd 17/25 50/53 796/609 61/ Prairie Ave / Grace Ave 102/37 601/ / / / / Prairie Ave / Florence Ave 67/54 65/73 909/ /72 447/ / / / / / /97 315/209 63/ / / / /33 4. Eucalyptus Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 156/ /595 34/ / /106 56/83 8/ Market St / Manchester Blvd 8. Hyde Park Blvd & Juniper St / La Brea Ave 44/96 80/161 11/23 30/22 158/72 9/7 11/6 218/175 24/13 40/ /784 25/31 14/49 94/70 15/13 18/28 680/ / La Brea Ave / Regent St 56/90 31/63 23/24 1/2 29/33 97/35 111/35 41/28 29/38 754/ / La Brea Ave / Florence Ave 40/30 156/ /80 127/91 314/95 25/29 23/ / /49 49/62 858/694 74/17 107/ /851 55/66 146/ /418 88/95 7. Eucalyptus Ave / Florence Ave 3. Inglewood Ave / Manchester Blvd 18/27 840/801 47/26 4/6 6. Eucalyptus Ave / Beach Ave 220/ / /29 78/42 933/472 39/39 16/17 396/231 18/5 72/86 371/ /77 8/11 123/ /132 30/46 153/105 59/90 2. Inglewood Ave / Florence Ave 65/97 658/1207 7/43 49/38 984/830 51/60 607/68 227/123 77/84 1. Inglewood Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 3/13 645/ /60 2/6 1171/ / /142 1/6 62/21 7/6 35/36 2/4 29/26 100/256 2/2 45/21 179/81 4/5 29. I-405 NB Ramps / Manchester Blvd Crenshaw Line Downtown TOD Study Area Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area City of Inglewood Transit Oriented District Development City City of of Inglewood Inglewood Figure 4 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes

19 Centinela Ave Exton Ave Centinela Ave Florence Ave Florence Ave La Brea Ave Market St Edgewood St Hillcrest Blvd Prairie Ave Manchester Boulevard Eucalyptus Avenue La Brea Ave La Brea Ave Park Avenue Warren Ln Eucalyptus Avenue Regent Street Queen Street Market St Locust St Beach Avenue Fir Avenue Grevillea Avenue Beach Avenue Hillcrest Blvd Legend Florence/La Brea Station Crenshaw Line Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Study Area Truck Routes ,000 1,500 Feet Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 5A Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Downtown Truck Routes USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

20 63th St Fairview Blvd Hyde Park Blvd Hyde Park Blvd West Blvd 67th St Crenshaw Blvd Redondo Blvd Florence Ave Florence Ave West Blvd Prairie Ave Crenshaw Blvd Legend Florence/West Station Crenshaw Line Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area Truck Routes Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood ,000 1,500 Feet Figure 5B Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Fairview Heights Truck Routes USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

21 Centinela Ave Exton Ave Centinela Ave Florence Ave Florence Ave La Brea Ave Market St Edgewood St Market St Hillcrest Blvd Prairie Ave Manchester Boulevard Eucalyptus Avenue La Brea Ave La Brea Ave Park Avenue Warren Ln Eucalyptus Avenue Regent Street Queen Street Beach Avenue Fir Avenue Grevillea Avenue Beach Avenue Locust St Hillcrest Blvd Legend Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Study Area Transit Facilities Line 442 Florence/La Brea Station Crenshaw Line Line 40 Line 111/311 Line 115 Line 607 ") Bus Stops Line 212/ ,000 1,500 Feet Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 6A Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Downtown Transit Facilities USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

22 63th St Fairview Blvd Hyde Park Blvd Hyde Park Blvd West Blvd 67th St Crenshaw Blvd Redondo Blvd Florence Ave Florence Ave Crenshaw Blvd Legend Prairie Ave Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area West Blvd Florence/West Station Crenshaw Line Line 110 Line 111/311 Line 210 Line 710 Line 740 ") Bus Stops Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood ,000 1,500 Feet Figure 6B Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Fairview Heights Transit Facilities USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

23 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Bus Route TABLE 2: STUDY AREA TRANSIT FACILITIES From / To To / From Via 40 South Bay Galleria Union Station 110 Playa Vista Bell Gardens Hawthorne Boulevard/La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue/Crenshaw Boulevard/MLK Jr Boulevard/Broadway Jefferson Boulevard/Sepulveda Boulevard/Hyde Park Boulevard/Gage Avenue Peak Hour Frequency AM PM min min min min 111/311 LAX City Bus Center Norwalk Station Florence Avenue min min 115 Playa Del Rey Norwalk Station Manchester Boulevard min min 210 South Bay Galleria Vine & Hollywood 211/215 Redondo Beach Inglewood Hawthorne/Lennox Station Hawthorne/Lennox Station Hawthorne/Lennox Station Inglewood Transit Center 710 South Bay Galleria Hollywood/Vine Red Line Station Hollywood/Vine Red Line Station Union Station Inglewood Transit Center Wilshire Western Purple Line Station Expo/Crenshaw 740 South Bay Galleria Station Source: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Artesia Boulevard/Crenshaw Boulevard/Rosemore Avenue/Vine Street South Bay Galleria/Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard/Inglewood Avenue Prairie Avenue/La Brea Avenue /Hollywood Boulevard Prairie Avenue/La Brea Avenue /Hollywood Boulevard La Brea Avenue/Manchester Avenue/Harbor Transitway La Brea Avenue/Regent Street/Beach Avenue/La Tijera Boulevard/Angeles Vista Boulevard/54 th Street/West Boulevard/Fairview Boulevard/Hyde Park Boulevard/Centinela Avenue/Locust Street/La Brea Avenue Redondo Beach Boulevard/Crenshaw Boulevard/Wilshire Boulevard Hawthorne Boulevard/Florence Avenue/Crenshaw Boulevard min min Limited service Limited service min min min min min min min min min min min min PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Existing pedestrian facilities within the study area generally consist of traditional sidewalks and pedestrian street crossings. The existing facilities are typically lacking in pedestrian enhancements such as landscaping, medians, pathways, alleys, and other pedestrian friendly amenities including shading, furniture, signage and other comforts. Figures 7A and 7B illustrate the pedestrian facilities in each TOD study area. Existing bicycle lanes exist on Florence Avenue east of Market Street and on Locust Street between Manchester Boulevard and Flroence Avenue. There is also a bike trail in Edward Vincent Junior Park. 20 Page

24 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Figures 8A and 8B illustrate the existing bicycle facilities and the proposed bicycle facilities listed in the City of Inglewood Circulation Element COLLISION HISTORY Collision data within the two TOD study areas were collected from the California Highway Patrol s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from 2003 to Figures 9A and 9B show the distribution of bicycle and pedestrian related collisions occurring within 250 feet of an intersection. Downtown TOD (Florence/La Brea Station) The number of bicycle and pedestrian collisions near intersections located in the Downtown TOD study area are relatively small, ranging from one to four accidents between 2003 and The only exception is in the Historic Downtown, at the intersection of Queen Street at La Brea Avenue, where there were five to eight pedestrian related collisions between 2003 and However, northwest of the study area, the intersection of Inglewood Avenue at Venice Way recorded nine to twelve bicycle related collisions and nine to twelve pedestrian related collisions, significantly higher than other surrounding intersections. Fairview Heights TOD (Florence/West Station) SWITRS data shows a very small number of collisions within the Fairview Heights TOD study area, with one to four bicycle or pedestrian related collisions on major thoroughfares such as Florence Avenue, 67 th Street, Hyde Park Boulevard, and Fairview Boulevard between 2003 and However, in the eastern portion of the study area, there appears to be higher numbers of collisions with intersections of Hyde Park Boulevard at Crenshaw Boulevard and 67 th Street at Crenshaw Boulevard both recording five to eight pedestrian related collisions. The area with the highest number of collisions, with over twelve pedestrian related collisions, is located at or near the intersection of Florence Avenue at Crenshaw Boulevard. 21 Page

25 Hillcrest Blvd Prairie Ave Locust St Market St Grevillea Avenue Fir Avenue Park Avenue Centinela Ave La Brea Ave Exton Ave Centinela Ave Edgewood St Warren Ln Florence Ave Market St Eucalyptus Avenue La Brea Ave Beach Avenue Beach Avenue Florence Ave Regent Street Text Queen Street Manchester Boulevard Legend Eucalyptus Avenue Florence/La Brea Station La Brea Ave Hillcrest Blvd Crenshaw Line Pedestrian Crosswalks Sidewalk Missing Sidewalk Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Study Area ,000 1,500 Feet Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 7A Downtown Existing Pedestrian Facilities Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

26 63th St Fairview Blvd West Blvd Hyde Park Blvd Crenshaw Blvd Hyde Park Blvd 67th St Redondo Blvd Florence Ave Florence Ave Prairie Ave West Blvd Crenshaw Blvd Legend Florence/West Station Crenshaw Line Pedestrian Crosswalks Sidewalk Missing Sidewalk Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood ,000 1,500 Feet Figure 7B Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Fairview Getmapping, Heights Aerogrid, Existing IGN, IGP, swisstopo, Pedestrian and the Facilities GIS User Community

27 Centinela Ave Exton Ave Centinela Ave Florence Ave Florence Ave La Brea Ave Market St Edgewood St Hillcrest Blvd Prairie Ave Manchester Boulevard Eucalyptus Avenue La Brea Ave La Brea Ave Park Avenue Warren Ln Eucalyptus Avenue Regent Street Queen Street Market St Locust St Beach Avenue Fir Avenue Grevillea Avenue Beach Avenue Hillcrest Blvd Legend Florence/La Brea Station Crenshaw Line Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Study Area Bicycle Route ,000 1,500 Feet Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 8A Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Downtown Bicycle Routes USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

28 63th St Fairview Blvd Hyde Park Blvd Hyde Park Blvd West Blvd 67th St Crenshaw Blvd Redondo Blvd Florence Ave Florence Ave West Blvd Prairie Ave Crenshaw Blvd Legend Florence/West Station Crenshaw Line Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area Bicyle Route Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood ,000 1,500 Feet Figure 8B Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Fairview Heights Bicycle Routes USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community

29 La Brea Ave Centinela Ave ,000 1,500 Feet Park Avenue Exton Ave Centinela Ave Florence Ave Florence Ave La Brea Ave Market St Edgewood St Warren Ln Eucalyptus Avenue Regent Street Queen Street Beach Avenue Fir Avenue Grevillea Avenue Market St Hillcrest Blvd Prairie Ave Manchester Boulevard La Brea Ave Eucalyptus Avenue Locust St Beach Avenue Hillcrest Blvd Legend Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Study Area Florence/La Brea Station Crenshaw Line Bicycle Related Collisions ( ) * 1-4 * 5-8 * 9-12 * >12 Pedestrian Related Collisions ( ) >12 Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 9A Downtown Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Bicycle AEX, and Getmapping, Pedestrian Aerogrid, Related IGN, IGP, Collisions swisstopo, (2003 and the - GIS 2011) User Community

30 Fairview Blvd ,000 1,500 63th St Hyde Park Blvd Feet Hyde Park Blvd West Blvd 67th St Crenshaw Blvd Redondo Blvd Florence Ave Florence Ave West Blvd Prairie Ave Crenshaw Blvd Legend Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area Florence/West Station Crenshaw Line Bicycle Related Collisions ( ) * 1-4 * 5-8 * 9-12 * >12 Pedestrian Related Collisions ( ) >12 Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 9B Fairview Heights Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Bicycle AEX, and Getmapping, Pedestrian Aerogrid, Related IGN, IGP, Collisions swisstopo, (2003 and the - GIS 2011) User Community

31 Traffic Impact Analysis Version FUTURE CIRCULATION SYSTEM FREEWAY NETWORK The future freeway network consists of the same freeways as the existing freeway network. There are no planned projects occurring on the freeways between 2015 and 2035 within the project area ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR NETWORK The future arterial and collector network is identical to the existing arterial and collector network with the exception of the following: Eucalyptus Avenue is designated as a minor arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element, resulting in a future configuration of two lanes in each direction. West Boulevard is designated as a minor arterial in the City s General Plan Circulation Element, resulting in a future configuration of two lanes in each direction. 2.4 FUTURE MULTIMODAL MOBILITY TRUCK CIRCULATION The City of Inglewood s truck routes are illustrated in Figures 5A and 5B, and are identical to the existing configuration PUBLIC TRANSIT The majority of the public transit system is expected to be identical in the future as it currently operates, with the exception of the addition of the Crenshaw/LAX LRT line that is currently under construction. The 8.5 mile Crenshaw/LAX line will connect the existing Exposition Line LRT and the Green Line LRT, near the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Eight new transit stations are planned, including two stations in the City of Inglewood at: Florence Avenue/La Brea Avenue and Florence Avenue/West Boulevard. The planned stations are projected to open and be operational in PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES The future pedestrian and bicycle facilities are planned to be identical to the existing system, with the following exceptions: According to the City of Inglewood General Plan Circulation Element, there are several proposed bicycle routes within the study area. In the Downtown TOD study area, two routes are listed: a bicycle route running in the westbound direction on Florence Avenue which turns southbound onto La Brea Ave; and a bicycle route which branches off Florence Avenue to Centinela Avenue, then it turns eastbound on Warren Lane and northbound on Marlborough Avenue. In the Fairview Heights TOD study area, one route is proposed to run from the intersection of Redondo Boulevard and Florence Avenue and continuing westbound to La Brea Avenue. In addition, the 2010 Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project LRT Bicycle Planning Study identified several potential bicycle facilities within each study area, which provide key connections to the proposed stations. It should be noted that these potential routes were recommended to the City of Inglewood for their review and have not been implemented. Figures 10A and 10B illustrate the proposed bicycle facilities from the 2010 LRT Bicycle Planning Study. 28 Page

32 Florence/La Brea Bicycle Connections Existing Bicycle Facilities Class i Class ii Class iii Planned Bicycle Facilities Class i Class ii Class iii Source: 2010 Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project - LRT Bicycle Planning Study Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 10A Downtown (Florence/La Brea) TOD Bicycle Facilities proposed in the 2010 LRT Bicycle Planning Study

33 Florence/West Bicycle Connections Planned Bicycle Facilities Class i Class ii Class iii Source: 2010 Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project - LRT Bicycle Planning Study Transit Oriented District City of Inglewood Figure 10B Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Bicycle Facilities proposed in the 2010 LRT Bicycle Planning Study

34 Traffic Impact Analysis Version TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The quality of traffic operations is characterized using the concept of level of service (LOS). Level of service is defined by a range of grades from A (best) to F (worst). At intersections, LOS A represents relatively free flow operating conditions with little or no delay. LOS F is characterized by extremely unstable flow conditions, severe congestion and delays with traffic volumes at or near the intersection s design capacity. This typically results in long vehicular queues extending from all approaches to intersection. In this report, analysis of traffic operations was conducted according to the traffic impact analysis guidelines used by the City of Inglewood. The City of Inglewood uses the Los Angeles County Public Works 1997 Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines. Utilizing these guidelines, intersection operating conditions were quantified using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU methodology is used for signalized intersections. The ICU methodology does not apply to non signalized intersections. However, in order to determine the change in volume to capacity ratios for the purposes of defining significant impacts, the non signalized intersections were evaluated as signalized intersections using the ICU methodology. Volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and corresponding level of service (LOS) were calculated at study intersections during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. It should be noted that three of the study intersections are located in the City of Los Angeles, or in close proximity; therefore, these intersections were also analyzed using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) methodology, per City of Los Angeles Guidelines. Both ICU and CMA methodologies are commonly used to determine V/C ratios. Table 3 presents a brief description of each level of service letter grade, as well as the range of V/C ratios associated with each grade for signalized intersections. 31 Page

35 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Level of Service TABLE 3: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS ICU METHODOLOGY Intersection Description Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio A Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation B Very good operation. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start to form. > C Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait more than 60 seconds, and back ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. > D Fair operation. Cars are sometimes required to wait more than 60 seconds during short peaks. There are no long standing traffic queues. > E Poor operation. Some long standing vehicular queues develop on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes. > F Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups form locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow. > Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., For intersections operated under Caltrans jurisdiction and the 5 legged intersection at Hyde Park Boulevard/Juniper Street/La Brea Avenue, analysis of traffic operations were conducted utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for evaluation of intersection operating conditions, which uses vehicular delay criteria to determine LOS. Hyde Park Boulevard/Juniper Street/La Brea Avenue intersection is analyzed in HCM methodology because ICU methodology does not support 5 legged intersections. Table 4 presents a brief description of each level of service letter grade, as well as the range of HCM average intersection delay associated with each grade for signalized intersections. 32 Page

36 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Level of Service TABLE 4: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS HCM METHODOLOGY Description Signalized Intersection Delay (seconds per vehicle) A Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. < 10 B Very good operation. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start to form. >10 and < 20 C Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait more than 60 seconds, and back ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. >20 and < 35 D Fair operation. Cars are sometimes required to wait more than 60 seconds during short peaks. There are no long standing traffic queues. >35 and < 55 E Poor operation. Some long standing vehicular queues develop on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes. >55 and < 80 F Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups form locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow. > 80 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Consistent with Los Angeles County Public Works traffic impact review guidelines, a project s traffic impact is evaluated based on ICU and is considered significant if the change in V/C ratio relative to the without project signalized intersection level of service (LOS) meets or exceeds the thresholds listed in Table Page

37 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 TABLE 5: INTERSECTION SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CRITERIA Intersection LOS in Pre Project Conditions V/C Project V/C Increase C 0.71 to or more D 0.81 to or more E / F 0.91 or more 0.01 or more A project impact is considered significant at a Caltrans facility if the project traffic results in a worsening of the level of service from LOS D or better to LOS E or F. In addition, a project impact is considered significant if a Caltrans facility is currently operating at LOS E or F and the project traffic results in an increase in average vehicle delay. 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate existing intersection operations during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the twenty nine (29) study intersections. Table 6 summarizes the existing LOS at the study intersections. LOS calculation sheets are provided in Appendix B. Figure 11 summarizes the existing intersection lane configurations. 34 Page

38 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Intersection TABLE 6: EXISTING INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE Control Type AM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay 1 Inglewood Ave/Hyde Park Blvd unsignalized A A 2 Inglewood Ave/Florence Ave signalized A C 3 Inglewood Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized D C 4 Eucalyptus Ave/Hyde Park Blvd unsignalized A A 5 Eucalyptus Ave/Juniper St unsignalized A A 6 Eucalyptus Ave/Beach Ave signalized C A 7 Eucalyptus Ave/Florence Ave signalized D B 8 Hyde Park Blvd /Juniper St/ La Brea Ave* signalized 23.1 C 26.2 C 9 Fir Ave/Florence Ave signalized B A 10 La Brea Ave/ Beach Ave signalized B B 11 La Brea Ave/Florence Ave signalized D D 12 La Brea Ave/Regent St signalized C A 13 La Brea Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized C D 14 Market St/Florence Ave signalized A A 15 Market St/Regent St signalized A A 16 Market St/Manchester Blvd signalized A A 17 Locust St/Florence Ave 1 unsignalized A A 18 Hillcrest Blvd/Florence Ave signalized A A 19 Hillcrest Blvd/Manchester Blvd signalized B B 20 Centinela Ave/Florence Ave signalized D C 21 Prairie Ave/Florence Ave signalized E D 22 Prairie Ave/Grace Ave signalized A A 23 Prairie Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized F F 24 West Blvd/Redondo Blvd signalized C B 25 West Blvd/Florence Ave signalized C C 26 Crenshaw Blvd/Florence Ave signalized D D 27 Crenshaw Blvd /Manchester Blvd signalized E D 28 La Cienega Blvd/Florence Ave** signalized 56.7 E 69.1 E 29 I 405 NB Ramp/Manchester Blvd** signalized 38.6 D 33.1 C Notes: V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio, LOS = Level of Service. Intersection operating below acceptable LOS are shown in bold. 1 = Unsignalized intersection analyzed as signalized to determine if significant impact criteria is satisfied based on ICU, since V/C ratio is not calculated using HCM stop controlled intersection methodologies. * Intersection analyzed in HCM methodology because ICU methodology does not support 5 legged intersections. Delay reported for this intersection. **Caltrans intersection, utilizing HCM delay based methodology to evaluate intersection operations. LOS 35 Page

39 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 As shown in Table 6, the following intersections are currently operating at unsatisfactory peak period levels of service (LOS E or worse during peak periods): Prairie Avenue/Florence Avenue (a.m. peak hour); Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard (a.m. and p.m. peak hour); Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard (a.m. peak hour); and La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue. 36 Page

40 West Blvd h Av e Market St ( (4 (8 (5 10. La Brea Ave / Beach Ave (6 18. Hillcrest Blvd / Florence Ave 19. Hillcrest Blvd / Manchester Blvd 8th Ave Crenshaw Dr Manchester Dr 23 ( Manchester Blvd 27 ( Crenshaw Blvd Hillcrest Blvd West Blvd Prairie Ave 19 Manchester Ter ( re st Bl La Brea Ave Kelso St Prairie Ave Eucalyptus Ave vd ( ( (3 Inlgewood Ave Oak St Manchester Blvd Locust St (9 Market St (7 Regent St Locust St / Florence Ave 22 ( illc (2 10 ( 14 ( 11 ( ( ( 16. Market St / Manchester Blvd Florence Ave 20 ( 18 Market St STOP 21 ( H ve ea nc re Flo 29 ( 15. Market St / Regent St St ( 26 ( 17 ( Cedar Ave 14. Market St / Florence ave el z Ha Fir Ave Hyde Park Blvd 13. La Brea Ave / Manchester Blvd 25 ( ve ea c ren 1 La Cienega Blvd 12. La Brea Ave / Regent St 24 ( Flo 28 ( 11. La Brea Ave / Florence Ave Blv Crenshaw Blvd ac e Av 9. Fir Ave / Florence Ave Be ea 8. Hyde Park Blvd & Juniper St / La Brea Ave a ep d Hy Br 7. Eucalyptus Ave / Florence Ave rk La 6. Eucalyptus Ave / Beach Ave d Centinela A ve 5. Eucalyptus Ave / Juniper St Inlgewood Ave 4. Eucalyptus Ave / Hyde Park Blvd Cedar St 3. Inglewood Ave / Manchester Blvd La Cienega Blvd 2. Inglewood Ave / Florence Ave STOP STOP STOP STOP 1. Inglewood Ave / Hyde Park Blvd STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP 20. Centinela Ave / Florence Ave Legend ( Study Intersections Crenshaw Line Station Crenshaw Line 21. Prairie Ave / Florence Ave 22. Prairie Ave / Grace Ave 23. Prairie Ave / Manchester Blvd 24. West Blvd / Redondo Blvd 25. West Blvd / Florence Ave 26. Crenshaw Blvd / Florence Ave 27. Crenshaw Blvd / Manchester Blvd 28. La Cienega Blvd / Florence Ave 29. I-405 NB Ramps / Manchester Blvd Downtown TOD Study Area Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area City of Inglewood Transit Oriented District Development City City of of Inglewood Inglewood Figure 11 Existing Intersection Lane Configurations

41 Traffic Impact Analysis Version TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT Traffic volume development was completed using a combination of the 2012 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) travel demand model and the 2010 Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP). 5.1 TRAVEL MODEL METHODOLOGY The SCAG model was used as a basis for developing plus project and long range travel demand forecasts for this project. The base year (2012) and forecast year (2035 baseline) SCAG travel demand model roadway networks were modified to include all study intersections and roadway segments within the study area. The transit network was verified in the future scenarios within the study area to ensure consistency with the Crenshaw/LAX LRT transit project and station locations. Land use inputs were adjusted in the with project scenarios using the planned TOD land use information (as discussed in Section 1.0 of this report). Separate model networks were developed for each of the following scenarios: Existing (2012) Existing Plus Project (2012), Forecast Year (2035) Without Project, and Forecast Year (2035) With Project. 5.2 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS Cumulative project traffic growth is growth due to specific, known development projects in the area surrounding the study locations that may affect future year traffic circulation. A list of cumulative projects within the region was provided by the City of Inglewood, as shown in Table 7. These cumulative projects were coded in the future year 2035 baseline travel demand model. 38 Page

42 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 TABLE 7: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Location Project Description East 99 th Street SPR for 12 new condominiums East Hazel Street Four (4) new residential condominiums East Manchester Terrace Four (4) new residential condominiums South Crenshaw Boulevard East Spruce Avenue Interior, exterior and parking lot improvements to convert a medical office building into a school Seven (7) new apartment units with semisubterranean parking West Imperial Highway Convert office space to charter school North Locust Street 32,000 sq ft senior center North Prairie Townhome Project/Daniel Freeman Hospital 9 Inglewood Stadium 330 townhomes 890,000 sq ft of retail use 2,500 residential units 780,000 sq ft of office use 300 guestroom Hotel 6,000 seat live venue 80,000 seat stadium 120,000 sq ft casino 4 acre site for Civic use East 99 th Street SPR for 12 new condominiums West Imperial Highway Construct a new two story 10 classroom building for Environmental Charter School (middle school) at Concordia Lutheran Church. 12 Market Gateway D3* 235 residential units 7,440 sq ft of restaurant use 7,625 sq ft of retail 2,120 sq ft of retail coffee shop 28,000 sq ft of retail grocery store Notes: *Market Gateway D3 project is included in the traffic analysis as part of the TOD Plan buildout. 5.3 MODELED LAND USE The land use assumptions for the existing scenario was assumed to be consistent SCAG 2012 RTP land use inputs. The future year without project scenario was modified slightly to include known cumulative projects within the City of Inglewood that were not included in the 2012 RTP land use inputs. The zone structure in the SCAG model does not line up directly with the boundaries for the two TOD districts (Downtown and Fairway Heights). The SCAG zones that include any portion of the TOD areas were selected for the modeling exercise, and are summarized in the tables in this section. Table 8 shows the Year 2012 and Year 2035 socioeconomic data (SED) prior to inclusion of additional known cumulative projects: 39 Page

43 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 TOD Area TABLE 8: SCAG MODEL SOCIO ECONOMIC DATA (SED) Population Households Total Employment Diff ( ) Diff ( ) Diff ( ) Downtown 12,055 11, ,869 4, ,300 9, Fairview Heights 7,566 7, ,161 2, Source: SCAG 2012 RTP As shown in Table 8, the SCAG model SED decreases from the base model year 2012 to future model year 2035 for the population and household categories, which has the potential to result in a decrease in study area trips for the future year. The cumulative projects discussed in Section 5.2 of this report were convered from land use to socioeconomic data, and were added to the 2035 without project scenario as background assumptions. The Fairview Heights district did not have any cumulative projects identified, and did not change from the baseline SCAG forecasts. Table 9 shows the Year 2012 and Year 2035 (adjsuted) SED after inclusion of the additional known cumulative projects: TOD Area TABLE 9: ADJUSTED MODEL SOCIO ECONOMIC DATA (SED) Population Households Total Employment Diff ( ) Diff ( ) Diff ( ) Downtown 12,055 12, ,869 5, ,300 9, Fairview Heights 7,566 7, ,161 2, Project only land use (as summarized from Table 1) converted to SED is shown in Table 10. These values were added to the values in Tables 8 and 9 to develop the with project scenarios. TABLE 10: PLUS PROJECT MODEL SOCIO ECONOMIC DATA (SED) Total TOD Area Population Households Employment Downtown 7,627 2,227 3,919 Fairview Heights , MODEL OUTPUTS Raw model turning movements were obtained from the above four model runs, and were summarized and post processed for use in intersection and roadway segment analysis. An NCHRP 255 delta process was used to determine final project turning movements. Because the model year of the travel demand model is 2012, post processing of modeled volumes was necessary to develop existing year 2015 volumes. Based on the traffic growth projection in the study area according to the 2010 Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) document, a percent growth was applied to the 2012 model volumes to get existing year 2015 volumes. 40 Page

44 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Therefore, it was determined that a conservative methodology would be applied, which used a combination of model volumes and a growth rate of 5 percent for the future year 2035 without project. This conservative approach was developed based on the 2010 CMP traffic growth forecast. 5.5 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Land use was modified in the SCAG model for the with project scenarios to develop traffic generation estimates for the proposed project. The land use for each TOD area is shown in Table 1. The SCAG 2012 travel demand model was used to estimate trip productions and trip attractions based on land use and network configurations (including transit network configuration and station location). The model then assigned the project trips to the existing roadway network in a dynamic method. The methodology used for the modeling process allowed for the SCAG model to estimate trip reductions based on mode availability in the future year Table 11 shows the a.m. and p.m. peak hour, as well as daily project trips generated by each TOD study area. TABLE 11: PROJECT TRIPS GENERATED PER TOD AREA TOD AM Peak Hour Existing Plus Project Scenario PM Peak Hour Daily Future Year 2035 With Project Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Downtown 1,987 2,878 32,759 1,952 2,836 32,195 Fairview Heights , ,401 Total Trips 2,157 3,182 36,190 2,121 3,139 35,596 As shown in Table 11, the project is expected to generate 2,157 a.m. peak hour trips, 3,182 p.m. peak hour trips and 36,190 daily trips in the existing plus project scenario. In the future year 2035 with project scenario, the project is expected to generate 2,121 a.m. peak hour trips, 3,139 p.m. peak hour trips and 35,596 daily trips. 41 Page

45 6.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Existing plus project volumes were developed as described in the Traffic Volume Development section and take into account the following: Roadway system configuration changes at Market Street between Florence Avenue and Regent Street Existing plus project conditions were developed by adding trips generated by the proposed project to the existing volumes. Figure 12 illustrates the existing plus project traffic volumes at the study intersections. 6.1 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate existing plus project intersection operations during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the study intersections. Table 12 summarizes the existing plus project level of service at the study intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. 42 Page

46 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Intersection Control Type TABLE 12: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS Change in V/C or Delay AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1 Inglewood Ave/Hyde Park Blvd unsignalized A A A A No 2 Inglewood Ave/Florence Ave signalized A C A C No 3 Inglewood Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized D C D C No 4 Eucalyptus Ave/Hyde Park Blvd unsignalized A A A A No 5 Eucalyptus Ave/Juniper St unsignalized A A A A No 6 Eucalyptus Ave/Beach Ave signalized C A B A No 7 Eucalyptus Ave/Florence Ave signalized D B D C No 8 Hyde Park Blvd/Juniper St/ La Brea Ave* signalized 23.1 C 26.2 C 17.8 C 26.3 C No 9 Fir Ave/Florence Ave signalized B A B A No 10 La Brea Ave/ Beach Ave signalized B B A A No 11 La Brea Ave/Florence Ave signalized D D C C No 12 La Brea Ave/Regent St signalized C A D C Yes 13 La Brea Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized C D F F Yes 14 Market St/Florence Ave signalized A A A A No 15 Market St/Regent St signalized A A A C No 16 Market St/Manchester Blvd signalized A A A A No 17 Locust St/Florence Ave 1 unsignalized A A B C No 18 Hillcrest Blvd/Florence Ave signalized A A A A No 19 Hillcrest Blvd/Manchester Blvd signalized B B B C No 20 Centinela Ave/Florence Ave signalized D C C C No 21 Prairie Ave/Florence Ave signalized E D E D Yes 22 Prairie Ave/Grace Ave signalized A A A A No 23 Prairie Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized F F F E No 24 West Blvd/Redondo Blvd signalized C B A A No Significant Impact? 43 Page

47 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Intersection Control Type Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS Change in V/C or Delay AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 25 West Blvd/Florence Ave signalized C C C C No 26 Crenshaw Blvd/Florence Ave signalized D D D C No 27 Crenshaw Blvd /Manchester Blvd signalized E D E D No 28 La Cienega Blvd/Florence Ave** signalized 56.7 E 69.1 E 59.4 E 66.1 E Yes 29 I 405 NB Ramp/Manchester signalized 38.6 D 33.1 C 38.1 D 32.3 C No Blvd** Notes: V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio, LOS = Level of Service. Intersection operating below acceptable LOS are shown in bold. 1 = Unsignalized intersection analyzed as signalized to determine if significant impact criteria is satisfied based on ICU, since V/C ratio is not calculated using HCM stopcontrolled intersection methodologies. * Intersection analyzed in HCM methodology because ICU methodology does not support 5 legged intersections. Delay reported for this intersection. **Caltrans intersection, utilizing HCM delay based methodology to evaluate intersection operations. Significant Impact? 44 Page

48 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 As shown in Table 12, traffic generated by the proposed project is forecast to result in significant traffic impacts at the following intersections in the existing plus project conditions: La Brea Avenue/Regent Street; La Brea Avenue/Manchester Boulevard; Prairie Avenue/Florence Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue. 45 Page

49 West Blvd Market St Inlgewood Ave La Cienega Blvd c (4 (8 (5 ( St 21 ( ( Florence Ave 20 ( ( 8th Ave Manchester Dr illc Manchester Blvd Market St Prairie Ave Kelso St ( Crenshaw Blvd H 23 ( Hillcrest Blvd Crenshaw Dr West Blvd 19 Manchester Ter ( re st Bl La Brea Ave Eucalyptus Ave vd ( ( (3 Inlgewood Ave Cedar Ave Oak St La Cienega Blvd Manchester Blvd Prairie Ave (9 Locust St (7 Regent St Market St (2 nc 10 ( 14 ( 11 ( ( ( Fir Ave Hyde Park Blvd ve ea re Flo 29 ( 133/ /709 el z Ha 26 ( 17 ( 28 ( 1503/ / ( ve ea Crenshaw Blvd Cedar St 23/27 786/ /35 299/ /843 56/39 914/ / /83 4/22 Legend 77/ / /98 341/ / / / / / /746 37/ / / /205 32/46 259/ Centinela Ave / Florence Ave 121/ / /190 89/55 288/305 50/16 5/4 637/399 55/51 739/ / /72 18/22 11/25 223/69 12/15 155/ /74 11/17 86/48 171/207 9/42 35/36 56/ /889 9/ /2 20 /10 01 / / / /156 0/5 0/8 1/18 89/3 108/47 29/11 9/5 430/206 18/18 349/ /301 88/ / /745 49/ /43 805/933 Av e 24 ( ren Market St / Regent St Blv Flo e Av 140/65 544/ /34 h ea 43/60 14/28 13/93 ac Br 602/ / / Hillcrest Blvd / Manchester Blvd 244/ / Hillcrest Blvd / Florence Ave 46/62 617/ /28 23/ / /67 Be (6 230/ / /227 25/ Market St / Florence ave 57/39 23/58 86/138 a ep d Hy 10. La Brea Ave / Beach Ave 978/ /962 rk La 9. Fir Ave / Florence Ave 15/12 36/21 39/47 d Centinela A ve 58/ /813 65/ Locust St / Florence Ave 140/ / / / /743 55/99 86/ /971 83/96 16/11 964/467 4/8 62/ /268 56/62 614/ /33 5. Eucalyptus Ave / Juniper St 52/5 173/99 53/ La Brea Ave / Manchester Blvd 417/255 63/ / / / / /810 11/12 237/ Eucalyptus Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 156/ / / / / /224 8/ Market St / Manchester Blvd 8. Hyde Park Blvd & Juniper St / La Brea Ave 44/102 86/111 11/23 30/22 198/109 9/7 11/6 218/175 24/13 118/7 1039/803 56/60 42/54 19/14 15/13 28/74 684/ /3 12. La Brea Ave / Regent St 56/91 37/93 23/5 1/2 29/33 99/41 98/72 19/6 29/ / / La Brea Ave / Florence Ave 69/ / /97 306/ /65 25/32 23/ / /49 62/ /629 87/16 107/ /745 46/65 148/ / / Eucalyptus Ave / Florence Ave 3. Inglewood Ave / Manchester Blvd 18/27 775/701 47/26 4/6 6. Eucalyptus Ave / Beach Ave 207/ / /29 90/56 945/521 39/39 16/17 387/206 18/5 72/86 342/ /77 8/11 110/36 212/157 30/46 74/78 59/90 2. Inglewood Ave / Florence Ave 62/ /1161 7/9 49/37 891/905 30/ /64 191/ /37 1. Inglewood Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 3/13 706/ /60 2/6 1142/ / /181 1/6 62/21 7/6 30/39 2/4 6/34 106/232 2/2 45/21 192/118 4/5 1/6 1260/1019 ( Study Intersections Crenshaw Line Station 27. Crenshaw Blvd / Manchester Blvd 10/ /566 26/ La Cienega Blvd / Florence Ave 19/48 760/ / / / / Crenshaw Blvd / Florence Ave 189/ /598 94/ / /80 149/ West Blvd / Florence Ave 146/ / /190 53/42 573/ / West Blvd / Redondo Blvd 87/ / / / / Prairie Ave / Manchester Blvd 5/5 50/11 522/330 2/5 22. Prairie Ave / Grace Ave 100/37 604/ / / / / Prairie Ave / Florence Ave 67/54 65/73 992/ /72 475/ / / / I-405 NB Ramps / Manchester Blvd Crenshaw Line Downtown TOD Study Area Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area City of Inglewood Transit Oriented Development District City City of of Inglewood Inglewood Figure 12 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes

50 Traffic Impact Analysis Version FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS Future year without project volumes were developed as described in the Traffic Volume Development section and take into account the following: Traffic growth based on a combination of SCAG 2012 RTP projected general employment growth and housing growth that occur in the SCAG region (including the study area) without the proposed TOD Plan and the 2010 CMP traffic volume growth factor (5%). Cumulative development projects within the study area provided by the City of Inglewood staff that were not included in the SCAG 2012 RTP forecasts. Two new Crenshaw LRT stations at the La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue intersection and West Boulevard/Florence Avenue intersection. o Metro s proposed configuration and operational improvements as part of the Crenshaw LRT project have been taken into consideration. 7.1 FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate future year 2035 without project intersection operations during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Figure 13 shows the forecast year 2035 without project peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Table 13 summarizes the forecast year 2035 without project levels of service at the study intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. 47 Page

51 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 TABLE 13: FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection Control Type AM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay 1 Inglewood Ave/Hyde Park Blvd Unsignalized A A 2 Inglewood Ave/Florence Ave Signalized A C 3 Inglewood Ave/Manchester Blvd Signalized D C 4 Eucalyptus Ave/Hyde Park Blvd Unsignalized A A 5 Eucalyptus Ave/Juniper St Unsignalized A A 6 Eucalyptus Ave/Beach Ave Signalized B A 7 Eucalyptus Ave/Florence Ave Signalized D C 8 Hyde Park Blvd /Juniper St/ La Brea Ave* Signalized 24.1 C 23.9 C 9 Fir Ave/Florence Ave Signalized B A 10 La Brea Ave/ Beach Ave Signalized A B 11 La Brea Ave/Florence Ave Signalized D C 12 La Brea Ave/Regent St Signalized C A 13 La Brea Ave/Manchester Blvd Signalized C C 14 Market St/Florence Ave Signalized A A 15 Market St/Regent St Signalized A A 16 Market St/Manchester Blvd Signalized A A 17 Locust St/Florence Ave 1 Unsignalized A A 18 Hillcrest Blvd/Florence Ave Signalized B A 19 Hillcrest Blvd/Manchester Blvd Signalized B B 20 Centinela Ave/Florence Ave Signalized B A 21 Prairie Ave/Florence Ave Signalized C C 22 Prairie Ave/Grace Ave Signalized A A 23 Prairie Ave/Manchester Blvd Signalized E F 24 West Blvd/Redondo Blvd Signalized B B 25 West Blvd/Florence Ave Signalized C C 26 Crenshaw Blvd/Florence Ave Signalized E D 27 Crenshaw Blvd /Manchester Blvd Signalized E D 28 La Cienega Blvd/Florence Ave** Signalized 79.9 E 87.4 F 29 I 405 NB Ramp/Manchester Blvd** Signalized 36.2 F 32.1 C Notes: V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio, LOS = Level of Service. Intersection operating below acceptable LOS are shown in bold. 1 = Unsignalized intersection analyzed as signalized to determine if significant impact criteria is satisfied based on ICU, since V/C ratio is not calculated using HCM stop controlled intersection methodologies. * Intersection analyzed in HCM methodology because ICU methodology does not support 5 legged intersections. Delay reported for this intersection. **Caltrans intersection, utilizing HCM delay based methodology to evaluate intersection operations. LOS 48 Page

52 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 As shown in Table 13, the following intersections are forecast to operate at unsatisfactory peak period levels of service (LOS E or worse during peak periods): Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard (a.m. and p.m. peak hour); Crenshaw Boulevard/ Florence Avenue (a.m. peak hour); Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard (a.m. peak hour); La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue (a.m. and p.m. peak hour); and I 405 Northbound Ramp/Manchester Boulevard. 49 Page

53 West Blvd Market St Inlgewood Ave La Cienega Blvd Av e (4 (8 (5 ( St 21 ( ( Florence Ave 20 ( ( 8th Ave Manchester Dr Manchester Blvd Market St Prairie Ave Kelso St ( Crenshaw Blvd illc H 23 ( Hillcrest Blvd Crenshaw Dr 19 Manchester Ter ( re st Bl La Brea Ave Eucalyptus Ave vd ( ( (3 Inlgewood Ave Oak St La Cienega Blvd Manchester Blvd Cedar Ave 29 ( West Blvd (9 Prairie Ave (7 Regent St Locust St (2 nc re Flo 10 ( 14 ( 11 ( ( ( Market St ve ea Fir Ave Hyde Park Blvd el z Ha 26 ( 17 ( 28 ( 332/ / ( ve ea c ren (6 1450/ / ( Flo Market St / Regent St Blv Crenshaw Blvd Cedar St 23/27 784/ /105 25/43 66/8 18/83 36/ /267 8/92 264/ /852 39/ / / /83 4/22 Legend 59/ / / / / / / / / /926 45/99 174/ / /190 32/46 259/ Centinela Ave / Florence Ave 123/ / /209 85/55 211/181 45/113 93/1 795/937 53/50 812/ / /146 18/22 50/25 223/143 12/15 118/72 162/104 11/17 86/72 278/286 9/17 118/120 49/ /971 4/ /2 20 /17 01 / / / /150 0/5 0/8 1/18 336/ /281 60/96 111/4 766/ / /43 800/925 73/38 105/46 29/26 9/5 463/307 18/18 140/65 662/ /166 27/36 94/180 12/19 h e Av 19. Hillcrest Blvd / Manchester Blvd ac ea 43/50 695/ /28 64/ / /64 Be 10. La Brea Ave / Beach Ave 27/22 373/134 53/23 a ep d Hy Br 14. Market St / Florence ave rk La 628/ / / / /103 57/39 164/120 86/146 18/26 15/82 63/3 18. Hillcrest Blvd / Florence Ave 1028/610 95/113 15/12 102/143 37/80 d Centinela A ve 43/ /824 67/51 9. Fir Ave / Florence Ave 68/ /219 56/ Locust St / Florence Ave 188/ / / / / /98 71/ / /53 16/ /497 63/21 97/123 52/53 614/ /33 5. Eucalyptus Ave / Juniper St 40/54 169/34 68/ La Brea Ave / Manchester Blvd 398/224 63/ / / / / /22 11/12 298/ Eucalyptus Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 156/ /710 34/ / /106 56/83 8/ Market St / Manchester Blvd 8. Hyde Park Blvd & Juniper St / La Brea Ave 44/101 84/182 11/23 30/22 198/78 9/7 11/6 218/175 24/13 32/7 1138/904 19/31 14/48 123/96 15/13 18/28 752/ /2 12. La Brea Ave / Regent St 56/90 35/71 23/29 1/2 29/33 103/37 179/51 8/18 29/38 813/ / La Brea Ave / Florence Ave 51/32 152/ /92 167/85 289/115 25/29 23/ / /49 45/25 946/814 67/16 107/ /901 50/65 147/ /493 73/59 7. Eucalyptus Ave / Florence Ave 3. Inglewood Ave / Manchester Blvd 18/27 873/868 47/26 4/6 6. Eucalyptus Ave / Beach Ave 234/ / /29 75/82 984/490 39/39 16/17 400/246 18/5 72/86 390/ /84 8/11 133/ /137 30/46 138/60 59/90 2. Inglewood Ave / Florence Ave 58/39 809/1427 7/9 49/ /882 26/65 607/49 205/ /81 1. Inglewood Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 3/13 754/ /60 2/6 1249/ / /148 1/6 62/21 7/6 37/38 2/4 37/12 109/299 2/2 45/21 198/87 4/5 1/6 1390/1091 ( Study Intersections Crenshaw Line Station 27. Crenshaw Blvd / Manchester Blvd 90/ /707 26/ La Cienega Blvd / Florence Ave 19/48 774/ / / / / Crenshaw Blvd / Florence Ave 187/ / / / / / West Blvd / Florence Ave 139/ / / /96 668/ / West Blvd / Redondo Blvd 87/ / / / / Prairie Ave / Manchester Blvd 42/62 50/54 903/631 57/ Prairie Ave / Grace Ave 99/35 600/ / / / / Prairie Ave / Florence Ave 67/53 65/73 951/ /72 459/ / / / I-405 NB Ramps / Manchester Blvd Crenshaw Line Downtown TOD Study Area Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area City of Inglewood Transit Oriented District Development City City of of Inglewood Inglewood Figure 13 Future Year 2035 Without Project Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes

54 Traffic Impact Analysis Version FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS Future year with project volumes were developed as described in the Traffic Volume Development section and take into account the following: Cumulative development projects within the study area provided by the City of Inglewood staff that were not included in the SCAG 2012 RTP forecasts (similar to future year 2035 without project). Roadway system configuration changes at Market Street between Florence Avenue and Regent Street Two new Crenshaw LRT stations at the La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue intersection and West Boulevard/Florence Avenue intersection (similar to future year 2035 without project). Future year 2035 with project volumes were developed by adding the trips generated by proposed project as described in the Traffic Volume Development section, to future year 2035 without project volumes. 8.1 FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate future year 2035 with project intersection operations during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Figure 14 shows the future year 2035 with project peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Table 14 summarizes the future year 2035 with project levels of service at the study intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. 51 Page

55 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Intersection TABLE 14: FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE Future Year 2035 Future Year 2035 Without Project Conditions With Project Conditions Control Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS Change in V/C or Delay AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1 Inglewood Ave/Hyde Park Blvd unsignalized A A A A No 2 Inglewood Ave/Florence Ave signalized A C A C No 3 Inglewood Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized D C D D Yes 4 Eucalyptus Ave/Hyde Park Blvd unsignalized A A A A No 5 Eucalyptus Ave/Juniper St unsignalized A A A A No 6 Eucalyptus Ave/Beach Ave signalized B A C A No 7 Eucalyptus Ave/Florence Ave signalized D C D C Yes 8 Hyde Park Blvd /Juniper St/ La Brea Ave* signalized 24.1 C 23.9 C 28.3 C 27.0 C No 9 Fir Ave/Florence Ave signalized B A C B No 10 La Brea Ave/ Beach Ave signalized A B B C No 11 La Brea Ave/Florence Ave signalized D C E D Yes 12 La Brea Ave/Regent St signalized C A E D Yes 13 La Brea Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized C C D E Yes 14 Market St/Florence Ave signalized A A A A No 15 Market St/Regent St signalized A A A B No 16 Market St/Manchester Blvd signalized A A A B No 17 Locust St/Florence Ave 1 unsignalized A A B D No 18 Hillcrest Blvd/Florence Ave signalized B A B A No 19 Hillcrest Blvd/Manchester Blvd signalized B B C C No 20 Centinela Ave/Florence Ave signalized B A B A No 21 Prairie Ave/Florence Ave signalized C C D D Yes 22 Prairie Ave/Grace Ave signalized A A A A No 23 Prairie Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized E F F F Yes 24 West Blvd/Redondo Blvd signalized B B A A No Significant Impact? 52 Page

56 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Intersection Control Type Future Year 2035 Without Project Conditions Future Year 2035 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS Change in V/C or Delay AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 25 West Blvd/Florence Ave signalized C C C C Yes 26 Crenshaw Blvd/Florence Ave signalized E D E E Yes 27 Crenshaw Blvd /Manchester Blvd signalized E D F E Yes 28 La Cienega Blvd/Florence Ave** signalized 79.9 E 87.4 F E F Yes 29 I 405 NB Ramp/Manchester signalized 36.2 F 32.1 C 36.1 D 32.4 C No Blvd** Notes: V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio, LOS = Level of Service. Intersection operating below acceptable LOS are shown in bold. 1 = Unsignalized intersection analyzed as signalized to determine if significant impact criteria is satisfied based on ICU, since V/C ratio is not calculated using HCM stopcontrolled intersection methodologies. * Intersection analyzed in HCM methodology because ICU methodology does not support 5 legged intersections. Delay reported for this intersection. **Caltrans intersection, utilizing HCM delay based methodology to evaluate intersection operations. Significant Impact? 53 Page

57 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 As shown in Table 14, based on the significant impact threshold criteria described in Section 3, traffic generated by the proposed project is forecast to result in significant traffic impacts at the following intersections in future year 2035 with project conditions: Inglewood Avenue/Manchester Avenue; Eucalyptus Avenue/Florence Avenue; La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue; La Brea Avenue/Regent Street; La Brea Avenue/Manchester Boulevard; Prairie Avenue/ Florence Avenue; Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard; West Boulevard/Florence Avenue; Crenshaw Boulevard/Florence Avenue; Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard; and La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue. 54 Page

58 West Blvd Market St Inlgewood Ave La Cienega Blvd c (4 (8 (5 ( St 21 ( ( Florence Ave 20 ( ( 8th Ave Crenshaw Dr Manchester Dr Manchester Blvd Market St Prairie Ave Kelso St ( Crenshaw Blvd illc H 23 ( Hillcrest Blvd West Blvd 19 Manchester Ter ( re st Bl La Brea Ave Eucalyptus Ave vd ( ( (3 Inlgewood Ave Cedar Ave Oak St La Cienega Blvd Manchester Blvd Prairie Ave (9 Locust St (7 Regent St Market St (2 nc 10 ( 14 ( 11 ( ( ( Fir Ave Hyde Park Blvd ve ea re Flo 29 ( 344/ /1100 el z Ha 26 ( 17 ( 28 ( 1491/ / ( ve ea Crenshaw Blvd Cedar St 23/27 790/ / / /915 28/ / / /83 4/22 Legend 49/ / / / / / / / / / /52 176/ / /182 32/46 259/ Centinela Ave / Florence Ave 152/ / /204 93/56 306/250 44/ /1 638/477 50/49 857/ / /139 18/22 34/26 223/136 12/15 148/ /179 11/17 90/ /326 2/3 174/169 68/ /1003 6/ /2 / /4 143/ / /137 0/5 0/8 1/18 307/ / / /96 855/ / /43 942/ /61 113/56 29/43 9/5 444/276 18/18 140/65 820/ /33 Av e 24 ( ren Market St / Regent St Blv Flo e Av 44/56 19/91 10/120 h ea 708/ / / Hillcrest Blvd / Manchester Blvd ac Br 18. Hillcrest Blvd / Florence Ave 328/ / Locust St / Florence Ave 40/43 760/ /28 13/ / /66 Be (6 244/ / /123 8/ Market St / Florence ave 57/39 186/170 86/208 a ep d Hy 10. La Brea Ave / Beach Ave 1176/ /1238 rk La 9. Fir Ave / Florence Ave 15/12 182/205 33/82 d Centinela A ve 47/ /848 68/ / / / / La Brea Ave / Manchester Blvd 562/ /104 89/ / /105 16/ /620 87/4 73/ /333 56/62 614/ /33 5. Eucalyptus Ave / Juniper St 41/ /10 121/ / / /68 11/12 307/ Eucalyptus Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 168/ /881 34/37 576/379 63/ / / Hyde Park Blvd & Juniper St / La Brea Ave 1115/ / /291 8/ Market St / Manchester Blvd 58/95 49/88 23/24 1/2 29/33 111/47 258/89 2/13 45/98 100/206 11/24 30/22 224/110 9/7 11/6 219/176 24/13 106/1 1250/ /149 33/57 42/19 15/13 31/69 844/ /0 12. La Brea Ave / Regent St 3. Inglewood Ave / Manchester Blvd 29/38 839/ / La Brea Ave / Florence Ave 91/ / / / /73 25/29 23/ / /52 59/ / /18 107/ /948 38/68 149/ / / Eucalyptus Ave / Florence Ave 55/8 1041/1683 7/2 18/27 949/972 48/27 4/6 6. Eucalyptus Ave / Beach Ave 191/ / /30 116/ /632 39/59 16/19 451/261 18/5 72/86 390/ /90 8/11 175/ /152 30/46 143/71 59/90 2. Inglewood Ave / Florence Ave 49/ /990 6/ /57 146/ /66 1. Inglewood Ave / Hyde Park Blvd 3/13 918/ /61 2/6 1305/ / /153 1/6 62/21 7/6 39/47 2/4 45/58 131/316 2/2 46/22 173/120 4/5 1/6 1463/1240 ( Study Intersections Crenshaw Line Station 27. Crenshaw Blvd / Manchester Blvd 137/ /686 26/ La Cienega Blvd / Florence Ave 19/ / / / / / Crenshaw Blvd / Florence Ave 186/ / / / / / West Blvd / Florence Ave 150/ / / / / / West Blvd / Redondo Blvd 87/ /1700 3/ / / Prairie Ave / Manchester Blvd 50/74 50/65 629/352 68/ Prairie Ave / Grace Ave 98/33 605/ / / / / Prairie Ave / Florence Ave 67/63 65/ / /72 532/ / / / I-405 NB Ramps / Manchester Blvd Crenshaw Line Downtown TOD Study Area Fairview Heights (Florence/West) TOD Study Area City of Inglewood Transit Oriented District Development City of City of Inglewood Inglewood Figure 14 Future Year 2035 With Project Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes

59 9.0 FREEWAY RAMP QUEUING ANALYSIS Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Queuing analyses were conducted for all of the off ramp approaches at ramp intersections under jurisdiction of Caltrans within the study area. The purpose of the analysis was to evaluate whether offramps have sufficient storage capacity so as to prevent future spillback onto the freeway mainline. The queue lengths were calculated using the Synchro 9 software, which evaluates for 95 th percentile queue lengths. The queuing analysis tables in this report show the 95 th percentile queues which are the results recommended to be used for design of storage lengths. The results of the queuing analysis are summarized in Table 15. Detailed queuing reports are included in Appendix E. Ramp Intersection 28. La Cienega Boulevard/ Florence Avenue Ramp Intersection 29. I 405 NB Ramp/ Manchester Boulevard TABLE 15: RAMP INTERSECTION QUEUING LENGTHS Future Year 2035 Without Project Future Year 2035 With Project Length Existing Existing Plus Project SBL SBT SBR SBL SBT SBR SBL SBT SBR SBL SBT SBR Storage Length 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 1,870 95th %ile Queue AM th %ile Queue PM Future Year 2035 Without Project Future Year 2035 With Project Length Existing Existing Plus Project NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR Storage Length 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 95th %ile Queue AM th %ile Queue PM As shown in Table 15, under future year 2035 conditions, the forecast peak hour 95 th percentile queue lengths on the two I 405 off ramp intersections are not expected to exceed the available storage area on the ramps and between the ramp intersections. 56 Page

60 Traffic Impact Analysis Version CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS (CMP) The Congestion Management Program (CMP) was created statewide as a result of Proposition 111 and has been implemented locally by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). The CMP, as adopted by SCAG for Los Angeles County, requires that the traffic impact of individual development projects of potential regional significance be analyzed. A specific system of arterial roadways plus all freeways comprise the CMP system. A total of 164 intersections are identified for monitoring on the system in Los Angeles County. This section describes the analysis of project related impacts on the CMP system. The analysis has been conducted according to the guidelines set forth in the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. According to the CMP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines developed by Metro, a CMP traffic impact analysis is required given the following conditions: CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including freeway on or off ramps, where the proposed project would add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. CMP freeway monitoring locations where the proposed project would add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. According to the CMP guidelines, a significant impact occurs when a proposed project increases traffic demand on a CMP facility by 2% of capacity (V/C 0.02 for arterial locations or D/C 0.02 for freeway locations), causing LOS F (V.C > 1.00 for arterial locations or D/C > 1.00 for freeway locations) CMP INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Two of the twenty nine (29) proposed study area intersections are part of the 164 CMP Arterial monitoring locations. Per the CMP guidelines, a project s traffic impact is considered significant if the change in V/C ratio relative to the without project increases by 2% (V/C > 0.02) causing the intersection to operate at LOS F. Furthermore, if the study intersection is operating at LOS E or better after the addition of the project, the intersection would not be considered significantly impacted regardless of the increase in V/C. The proposed project adds over 50 trips at these intersections; therefore, a CMP intersection analysis was conducted and summarized in Table Intersection La Brea Ave/ Manchester Blvd Crenshaw Blvd/ Manchester Blvd TABLE 16: CMP INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Future Year 2035 Future Year 2035 Without Project Conditions With Project Conditions AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Change in V/C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Significant Impact? C C D E No E D F E Yes As shown in Table 16, under future year 2035 with project conditions, the proposed project is forecast to result in a significant impact at the CMP monitored Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard 57 Page

61 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 intersection. As discussion of potential mitigation measures to reduce the level of impact is provided in Section CMP MAINLINE FREEWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS The 2010 CMP monitors freeway conditions at eight (8) locations on I 405. The nearest freeway segment station is approximately 1.25 miles north of the project site: I 405 north of La Tijera Boulevard. Freeway mainline segments are assigned a LOS based on a demand to capacity (D/C) ratio, as shown in Table 17: TABLE 17: FREEWAY SEGMENT LOS D/C Ratio LOS D/C Ratio LOS A > F(0) > B > F(1) > C > F(2) > D > 1.45 F(3) > E Source: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2010 Congestion Management Program Appendix D, Exhibit D 6 Based on incremental project trip generation estimates, the proposed project would add more than 150 peak hour trips; therefore, a CMP mainline freeway segment analysis was conducted. Table 18 shows the 2010 CMP freeway conditions used as a baseline for this analysis: 58 Page

62 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 CMP Freeway Monitoring Station Capacity TABLE 18: 2010 CMP FREEWAY CONDITIONS 2009 CMP Freeway Northbound Southbound AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Demand D/C LOS Demand D/C LOS Demand D/C LOS Demand D/C LOS I 405 north of La Tijera Boulevard 10,000 14, F(2) 14, F(2) 10, F(0) 11, F(0) Source: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 2010 Congestion Management Program As mentioned earlier, the CMP estimates a traffic growth of 5.3 percent between 2010 and 2035 in the Regional Statistical Area (RSA) 18, which corresponds to the City of Inglewood. This growth rate was applied to the volume listed in the 2010 CMP (Table 18) to obtain future year 2035 freeway volumes. Project trips were then added to the future year 2035 without project to obtain 2035 with project freeway conditions. Table 19 shows the future year 2035 without and with project CMP freeway analysis. CMP Freeway Monitoring Station Capacity TABLE 19: FUTURE YEAR 2035 CMP FREEWAY CONDITIONS Future Year 2035 CMP Freeway Conditions Northbound Southbound AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Demand D/C LOS Demand D/C LOS Demand D/C LOS Demand D/C LOS I 405 north of La Tijera Boulevard 10,000 15, F(3) 15, F(3) 10, F(0) 12, F(0) Project Trips Future Year 2035 With Project Trips on I 405 north of La Tijera Boulevard Difference D/C (With Project Without Project) 10,000 15, F(3) 15, F(3) 10, F(0) 12, F(0) >0.02 >0.02 Under future year 2035 with project conditions, I 405 north of La Tijera Boulevard is not impacted by the project. 59 Page

63 Traffic Impact Analysis Version CMP TRANSIT IMPACT ANALYSIS Section D.8.4 of the 2010 CMP outlines the methodology for estimating the number of transit trips expected to result from the proposed project. This methodology assumes an average vehicle ridership (AVR) factor of 1.4 to estimate obtain the number of person trips generated by the project. Furthermore, because the TOD areas are primarily commercial use within ¼ mile of the proposed Crenshaw stations, CMP guidelines allow for 9% of person trips to be assigned to transit trips. Table 20 shows the number of a.m. and p.m peak hour and daily project trips generated by each TOD area: TOD TABLE 20: TRANSIT TRIPS CALCULATIONS AM Peak Hour Transit Trips PM Peak Hour Transit Trips Daily Transit Trips Downtown ,057 Fairview Heights Total ,485 Note: Rounded to the nearest 10 trips The two TOD areas are served by 12 transit lines as detailed in Section of this report. In addition, the new Crenshaw/LAX LRT is scheduled to start service in Metro s ridership forecast published in estimated the daily ridership for the Crenshaw LRT between 15,200 to 21,300 between the Green Line (Redondo Beach station) to the Exposition Line (Crenshaw Station). For the purpose of this analysis, 21,300 was used to determine the transit impact generated by the project. Table 21 shows the 2015 daily ridership on a typical weekday for all lines within the study area. TABLE 21: STUDY AREA TRANSIT FACILITIES 2015 DAILY RIDERSHIP Bus Peak Hour Frequency 2015 Daily From / To To / From Route Ridership AM PM 40 South Bay Galleria Union Station min min 19, Playa Vista Bell Gardens min min 9, /311 LAX City Bus Center Norwalk Station min min 18, Playa Del Rey Norwalk Station min min 16, South Bay Galleria Vine & Hollywood min min 14, Hawthorne/Lennox Hollywood/Vine Station Red Line Station min min 14, South Bay Galleria Wilshire Western Purple Line Station min min 8, South Bay Galleria Expo/Crenshaw Station min min 3,095 Crenshaw LRT Exposition Line Green Line N/A N/A 21,300* 2015 Daily Ridership within the Study Area 127,006 Source: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Note: *Forecast Ridership for Metro s Exposition LRT 1 Source: Metro thomas.lacounty.gov/pdfs/issues/ _ntc_factsheet_Crenshaw_cmc_FINAL.pdf 60 Page

64 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 As shown in Table 20, the project is expected to generate 267 a.m. peak hour transit trips, 396 p.m peak hour transit trips, and 4,485 daily transit trips. Using the CMP approach, transit person trips as part of this project were compared to the 2015 transit ridership in Table 21. It was concluded that the project daily transit trips would increase the daily transit ridership within the study area by approximately 3.5%. At this level of increase, a project related impact on the regional transit system would not be considered significant POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES The following potential mitigation measures have been identified for the significantly impacted intersections during future year 2035 with project conditions: Inglewood Avenue/Manchester Boulevard o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. However, the intersection operations can be improved by modifying the eastbound left turn phase from permitted to protected. Eucalyptus Avenue/Florence Avenue o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. However, the intersection operations can be improved by restriping the northbound approach to provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one rightturn lane. La Brea Avenue/Regent Street o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. Due to right of way constraints, no feasible physical improvements (roadway widening, additional lanes, etc.) are identified for this intersection. However, the intersection operations can be improved by modifying the northbound and westbound left turn phases from permitted to protected. La Brea Avenue/Manchester Boulevard o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. However, the intersection operations can be improved by restriping the northbound and eastbound approaches to provide a dedicated right turn lane. Prairie Avenue/ Florence Avenue o This impact can be fully mitigated by adding a second westbound left turn lane. Implementation of this mitigation would likely require a reduction in existing lane widths. Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. Due to right of way constraints, no feasible physical improvements (roadway widening, additional lanes, etc.) are identified for this intersection. However, 61 Page

65 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 the intersection operations can be improved by adding a westbound right turn overlap phase. West Boulevard/Florence Avenue o This impact can be fully mitigated by restriping the north leg of the intersection to include a second southbound left turn lane, within the existing curb to curb right of way. Crenshaw Boulevard/Florence Avenue o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. Due to right of way constraints, no feasible physical improvements are identified for this intersection. Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard o This impact cannot be fully mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. Due to right of way constraints, no feasible improvements are identified for this intersection. La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue o This impact cannot be mitigated, and therefore would be considered significant and unavoidable. Due to right of way constraints associated with proximity I 405 and the future Crenshaw/LAX LRT, no feasible improvements are identified for this intersection. Table 22 summarizes the future year 2035 with project levels of service assuming implementation of the recommended mitigation measure at the study intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. 62 Page

66 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 Intersection TABLE 22: FUTURE YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE MITIGATED CONDITIONS Future Year 2035 Future Year 2035 Without Project Conditions With Project Mitigated Conditions Control Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay Change in V/C 3 Inglewood Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized C C D D Yes 7 Eucalyptus Ave/Florence Ave signalized D C D C No 11 La Brea Ave/Florence Ave signalized D C E D Yes 12 La Brea Ave/Regent St signalized C A D B Yes 13 La Brea Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized C C D E Yes 21 Prairie Ave/Florence Ave signalized C C C C No 23 Prairie Ave/Manchester Blvd signalized E F E E Yes 25 West Blvd/Florence Ave signalized C C C B No 26 Crenshaw Blvd/Florence Ave signalized E D E E Yes 27 Crenshaw Blvd/Manchester Blvd signalized E D F E Yes 28 La Cienega Blvd/Florence Ave** signalized 79.9 E 87.4 F E F Yes LOS V/C or Delay LOS V/C or Delay LOS AM Peak Hour Notes: V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio, LOS = Level of Service. Intersection operating below acceptable LOS are shown in bold. * Intersection analyzed in HCM methodology because ICU methodology does not support 5 legged intersections. Delay reported for this intersection. **Caltrans intersection, utilizing HCM delay based methodology to evaluate intersection operations. PM Peak Hour Significant Impact? 63 Page

67 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 As mentioned earlier, in the future year 2035 with project conditions, the proposed project is forecast to result in significant traffic impacts at 11 of the 29 study intersections. As shown in Table 22, the proposed mitigation measures would mitigate three (3) of these 11 intersections, resulting in eight (8) intersections remaining significantly impacted by the project CONCLUSIONS The City of Inglewood Downtown and Fairview Heights TOD TIA evaluated the potential impacts to traffic operations at twenty nine (29) intersections located within the Downtown and Fairview Heights Transit Oriented Districts in the City of Inglewood. The analysis evaluated impacts to existing conditions and future year 2035 conditions. Currently, based on existing year 2015 conditions, four (4) intersections are operating at unsatisfactory levels of service (LOS E or worse). Utilizing the SCAG 2012 travel demand model was to estimate trip productions and attractions, the proposed project (total of both TOD areas) is expected to generate 2,157 a.m. peak hour trips, 3,182 p.m. peak hour trips and 36,190 daily trips in the existing plus project scenario. In the future year 2035 with project scenario, the project is expected to generate 2,121 a.m. peak hour trips, 3,139 p.m. peak hour trips and 35,596 daily trips. Based on the significant impact criteria described in Section 3.0, traffic generated by the proposed project in existing conditions is forecast to result in significant traffic impacts at four study intersections. Future year 2035 without project volumes were developed as described in Section 7.0. Based on the LOS analysis conducted, five (5) study intersections are forecast to be operate at LOS E or F. Future year 2035 with project volumes were developed by adding the trips generated by proposed project to future year 2035 without project volumes. Based on the significant impact criteria described in Section 3.0, traffic generated by the proposed project in future year 2035 is forecast to result in significant traffic impacts at 11 study intersections. Iteris evaluated a variety of intersection improvements necessary to provide improved LOS in the future year 2035 with project conditions. As detailed in Section 11.0 of this report, the proposed mitigation measures would mitigate three (3) of the 11 impacted study intersections, resulting in eight (8) intersections remaining significantly impacted by the project. Due to right of way constraints at some of the nine intersections, no feasible physical improvements were able to be identified to mitigate the project impact. In addition to intersection LOS analysis, queuing analyses were conducted for two freeway ramp intersections under jurisdiction of Caltrans and calculated using the 95 th percentile queues. The queues on the two I 405 off ramp intersections are not expected to exceed the available storage area on the ramps and between the ramp intersections. Iteris also performed a CMP analysis for intersections, freeway, and transit using the guidelines specified in the 2010 CMP Appendix D. Based on CMP thresholds of significance criteria, one CMP monitored intersection in the study area, Crenshaw Boulevard/Manchester Boulevard, would be significantly 64 Page

68 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 impacted by proposed project. Due to right of way constraints, no feasible improvements are identified to mitigate the impact at this intersection. The CMP freeway segment analysis evaluated future year 2035 conditions without and with the project at the station closest to the TOD study areas. Based on incremental project trip generation estimates, the proposed project under future year 2035 with project conditions would not impact I 405 segment (north of La Tijera Boulevard) monitored by the CMP. As a result, no traffic mitigation measures are required. Furthermore, the CMP transit impact analysis determined that the project related impacts on the regional transit system would not be significant. 65 Page

69 Submitted by: DOWNTOWN AND FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICT (TOD) CITY OF INGLEWOOD TECHNICAL APPENDIX Submitted to: City of Inglewood J

70 Traffic Impact Analysis Version 1 APPENDIX A: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA

71 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Inglewood Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Inglewood Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

72 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Inglewood Avenue Out In Total Right 0 Thru 1 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 645 Thru 22 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 62 Thru 1 Right Out In Total Inglewood Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 08:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

73 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Inglewood Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Inglewood Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

74 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Inglewood Avenue Out In Total Right 8 Thru 18 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 1349 Thru 60 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 21 Thru 6 Right Out In Total Inglewood Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:15 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

75 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINMAAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Inglewood Avenue Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Inglewood Avenue Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

76 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINMAAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Inglewood Avenue Out In Total Right 169 Thru 43 Left Peak Hour Data Manchester Boulevard Out In Total Left 658 Thru 7 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Manchester Boulevard Left 77 Thru 227 Right Out In Total Inglewood Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 07:00 AM 07:45 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

77 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINMAPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Inglewood Avenue Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Inglewood Avenue Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Inglewood Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

78 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Inglewood Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDINMAPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Inglewood Avenue Out In Total Right 206 Thru 43 Left Peak Hour Data Manchester Boulevard Out In Total Left 1207 Thru 43 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Manchester Boulevard Left 84 Thru 123 Right Out In Total Inglewood Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:30 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

79 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Eucalyptus Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDEUFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Eucalyptus Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Eucalyptus Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Eucalyptus Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Eucalyptus Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

80 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Eucalyptus Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDEUFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Eucalyptus Avenue Out In Total Right 289 Thru 52 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 658 Thru 24 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 18 Thru 396 Right Out In Total Eucalyptus Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

81 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Eucalyptus Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDEUFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Eucalyptus Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Eucalyptus Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Eucalyptus Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Eucalyptus Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

82 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Eucalyptus Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDEUFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Eucalyptus Avenue Out In Total Right 350 Thru 92 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 1079 Thru 29 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 5 Thru 231 Right Out In Total Eucalyptus Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

83 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Fir Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDFIFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Fir Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Fir Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Fir Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Fir Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

84 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Fir Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDFIFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Fir Avenue Out In Total Right 171 Thru 11 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 630 Thru 47 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 57 Thru 171 Right Out In Total Fir Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

85 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Fir Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDFIFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Fir Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Fir Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Fir Avenue Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound Fir Avenue Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

86 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Fir Avenue E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDFIFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Fir Avenue Out In Total Right 92 Thru 17 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 1031 Thru 47 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 23 Thru 88 Right Out In Total Fir Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

87 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Brea Avenue E/W: Beach Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLBBEAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume La Brea Avenue Southbound Beach Avenue Westbound La Brea Avenue Northbound Beach Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % La Brea Avenue Southbound Beach Avenue Westbound La Brea Avenue Northbound Beach Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

88 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Brea Avenue E/W: Beach Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLBBEAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 La Brea Avenue Out In Total Right 783 Thru 40 Left Peak Hour Data Beach Avenue Out In Total Left 39 Thru 41 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Beach Avenue Left 64 Thru 1018 Right Out In Total La Brea Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:45 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

89 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Brea Avenue E/W: Beach Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLBBEPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume La Brea Avenue Southbound Beach Avenue Westbound La Brea Avenue Northbound Beach Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % La Brea Avenue Southbound Beach Avenue Westbound La Brea Avenue Northbound Beach Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

90 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Brea Avenue E/W: Beach Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLBBEPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 La Brea Avenue Out In Total Right 1128 Thru 65 Left Peak Hour Data Beach Avenue Out In Total Left 104 Thru 64 Right Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Beach Avenue Left 56 Thru 803 Right Out In Total La Brea Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

91 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Hillcrest Boulevard E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDHIMAAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Hillcrest Boulevard Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Hillcrest Boulevard Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Hillcrest Boulevard Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Hillcrest Boulevard Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

92 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Hillcrest Boulevard E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDHIMAAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Hillcrest Boulevard Out In Total Right 199 Thru 55 Left Peak Hour Data Manchester Boulevard Out In Total Left 629 Thru 16 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Manchester Boulevard Left 56 Thru 247 Right Out In Total Hillcrest Boulevard Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

93 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Hillcrest Boulevard E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDHIMAPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume Hillcrest Boulevard Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Hillcrest Boulevard Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Hillcrest Boulevard Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound Hillcrest Boulevard Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

94 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: Hillcrest Boulevard E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDHIMAPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 Hillcrest Boulevard Out In Total Right 184 Thru 80 Left Peak Hour Data Manchester Boulevard Out In Total Left 1228 Thru 28 Right Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Manchester Boulevard Left 62 Thru 205 Right Out In Total Hillcrest Boulevard Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:45 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

95 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: West Boulevard E/W: Redondo Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDWEREAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume West Boulevard Southbound West Boulevard Northbound Redondo Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % West Boulevard Southbound West Boulevard Northbound Redondo Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

96 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: West Boulevard E/W: Redondo Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDWEREAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 2 West Boulevard Out In Total Right 794 Thru Peak Hour Data Redondo Boulevard Out In Total Left 50 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Total Volume North Left 61 Thru Out In Total West Boulevard Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 08:00 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

97 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: West Boulevard E/W: Redondo Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDWEREPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume West Boulevard Southbound West Boulevard Northbound Redondo Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % West Boulevard Southbound West Boulevard Northbound Redondo Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

98 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: West Boulevard E/W: Redondo Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWDWEREPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 2 West Boulevard Out In Total Right 862 Thru Peak Hour Data Redondo Boulevard Out In Total Left 53 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Total Volume North Left 27 Thru Out In Total West Boulevard Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:15 PM 04:45 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

99 File Name: C:\Users\Rachel\Desktop\ \IWDCRMAAM.PPD Start Date: 3/5/2015 Start Time: 7:00:00 AM Site Code: Comment 1: City of Inglewood Comment 2: N/S: Crenshaw Boulevard Comment 3: E/W: Manchester Avenue Comment 4: Weather: Clear Crenshaw Boulevard Manchester Avenue Crenshaw Boulevard Manchester Avenue Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Peak Hour Vols PHF 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Peak Hour Vo

100 File Name: C:\Users\Rachel\Desktop\ \IWDCRMAPM.PPD Start Date: 3/5/2015 Start Time: 4:00:00 PM Site Code: Comment 1: City of Inglewood Comment 2: N/S: Crenshaw Boulevard Comment 3: E/W: Manchester Avenue Comment 4: Weather: Clear Crenshaw Boulevard Manchester Avenue Crenshaw Boulevard Manchester Avenue Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Peak Hour Vols PHF 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Peak Hour Vo

101 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Cienega Boulevard E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLAFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume La Cienega Boulevard Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound La Cienega Boulevard Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % La Cienega Boulevard Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound La Cienega Boulevard Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

102 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Cienega Boulevard E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLAFLAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 La Cienega Boulevard Out In Total Right 460 Thru 328 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 354 Thru 26 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 149 Thru 454 Right Out In Total La Cienega Boulevard Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 08:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 08:00 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

103 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Cienega Boulevard E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLAFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume La Cienega Boulevard Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound La Cienega Boulevard Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % La Cienega Boulevard Southbound Florence Avenue Westbound La Cienega Boulevard Northbound Florence Avenue Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

104 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: La Cienega Boulevard E/W: Florence Avenue Weather: Clear File Name : IWDLAFLPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/21/2016 Page No : 2 La Cienega Boulevard Out In Total Right 630 Thru 472 Left Peak Hour Data Florence Avenue Out In Total Left 700 Thru 24 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Florence Avenue Left 30 Thru 253 Right Out In Total La Cienega Boulevard Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

105 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWD405NMAAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 1 Ash Avenue Southbound Groups Printed- Total Volume Manchester Boulevard Westbound I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Ash Avenue Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

106 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWD405NMAAM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 2 Ash Avenue Out In Total Right 0 Thru 4 Left Peak Hour Data Manchester Boulevard Out In Total Left 608 Thru 418 Right Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Manchester Boulevard Left 731 Thru 168 Right Out In Total I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

107 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWD405NMAPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 1 Ash Avenue Southbound Groups Printed- Total Volume Manchester Boulevard Westbound I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Ash Avenue Southbound Manchester Boulevard Westbound I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue Northbound Manchester Boulevard Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM Total Volume % App. Total PHF

108 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA (951) City of Inglewood N/S: I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue E/W: Manchester Boulevard Weather: Clear File Name : IWD405NMAPM Site Code : Start Date : 4/28/2016 Page No : 2 Ash Avenue Out In Total Right 0 Thru 22 Left Peak Hour Data Manchester Boulevard Out In Total Left 1060 Thru 319 Right Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Total Volume North Right Thru Left Out In Total Manchester Boulevard Left 375 Thru 245 Right Out In Total I-405 Northbound Ramps/Ash Avenue Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 05:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins mins mins mins Total Volume % App. Total PHF

109 3. Market Street/Florence Avenue 2. La Brea Avenue/Florence Avenue 1. La Cienega Boulevard/Florence Avenue Market Street La Brea Avenue 999 (607) 57 (49) acc 146 (151) 830 (418) 88 (95) ace 140 (65) 607 (786) 124 (172) 70 (24) 1,049 (407) 318 (265) ace La Cienega Boulevard (128) 529 (637) abe (516) ace ae Florence Avenue ace Florence Avenue ace Florence Avenue 52 (51) 0 (0) 68 (76) ccf 619 (990) 99 (99) 74 (17) 858 (694) 49 (62) ace 107 (115) 514 (851) 55 (66) 100 (18) 374 (227) 57 (135) ace 68 (131) 379 (707) 30 (41) 6. Centinela Avenue/Florence Avenue 5. Hillcrest Boulevard/Florence Avenue 4. Locust Street/Florence Avenue Centinela Avenue 1,448 (826) 1,193 (641) ccff 285 (240) 705 (825) 1,256 (707) 226 (203) acc 1,115 (635) 207 (106) acc aaf Florence Avenue agf Florence Avenue Florence Avenue STOP g acc 268 (288) 613 (928) 63 (34) 315 (209) ccf 625 (1,030) 55 (99) 8 (24) 56 (83) ccf 614 (1,045) 14 (33) Hillcrest Boulevard Locust Street 9. Market Street/Regent Street 8. La Brea Avenue/Regent Street 7. Prairie Avenue/Florence Avenue Market Street La Brea Avenue 100 (18) 707 (950) 44 (127) (22) ae (159) 43 (28) (16) bf25 41 (65) 18 (28) (91) ae (95) 25 (29) 1,818 (1,040) 413 (408) accc ace ae Regent Street ace Regent Street aaf Florence Avenue 42 (31) 73 (71) 18 (26) ae 36 (61) 164 (377) 14 (65) 135 (49) 794 (665) 23 (101) acf 40 (30) 156 (251) 108 (80) 820 (443) 447 (469) ccf 827 (1,230) 489 (501) Prairie Avenue 12. Prairie Avenue/Manchester Boulevard 11. Market Street/Manchester Boulevard 10. La Brea Avenue/Manchester Boulevard Prairie Avenue 56 (52) 766 (968) 224 (409) Market Street La Brea Avenue 575 (249) 1,024 (653) 184 (233) accf 40 (36) 1,069 (784) 25 (31) ace (41) ae17 69 (108) 18 (52) 156 (126) 884 (595) 34 (37) accf 143 (108) 512 (740) 103 (171) acce accf accf Manchester Boulevard ae Manchester Boulevard ace Manchester Boulevard 177 (188) 867 (654) 178 (287) acce 102 (37) 601 (1,101) 120 (186) 15 (13) 94 (70) 14 (49) ace 18 (28) 680 (1,144) 21 (25) 125 (95) 754 (422) 29 (38) ace 157 (140) 550 (1,101) 80 (97) Figure 2-2 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations Existing (2016) Conditions