COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

Transcription

1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 333 Broadalbin Street S, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR Ph: Fax: STAFF REPORT Application for Site Plan Review and Adjustment Review SP-15-17/AD Starbuck s Coffee/Gentle Dental SUMMARY This staff report evaluates Site Plan Review and Adjustment Review applications for development at 2708 Santiam Highway SE. The subject site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) and includes two contiguous parcels at the southeast corner of averly Drive and Highway 20. The applicant proposes to modify and reduce the size of an existing building to 3,400 square feet for use as a dental office, to construct a new 2,100 square-foot building with a drive-through for use as Starbucks Restaurant, and to install shared parking, landscaping, and associated site improvements. The proposal includes the dedication of right-of-way along averly Drive and a request for Adjustment Review approval to allow a reduced travel lane width between the two buildings. The analysis in this report finds that the proposed development will satisfy the review criteria and applicable development standards set forth in Albany Development Code (ADC) with conditions of approval to ensure compliance. APPLICATION INFORMATION DATE OF REPORT: October 27, 2017 TYPE OF APPLICATION: REVIE BODY: STAFF REPORT BY: Site Plan Review for new development of a drive-through restaurant, modifications to existing building for dental office use, and associated site improvements with Adjustment Review for reduced travel aisle width Staff Shawna Adams, Project Planner PROPERTY ONER Lee Herron Bob and Molly Gordon; 6621 alnut Terr; Tigard, OR APPLICANT/ REPRESENTATIVE: ARCHITECT / REPRESENTATIVE: ENGINEER/ REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Cantlin; Madison Development Group LLC; 141 Front Street North; Issaquah, A Kirk Callison; Twist Design; 4444 oodland Park Ave N.; Seattle, A Justin Gerlitz; Gerlitz Engineering; 1867 illiams Highway, Suite 201; Grants Pass, OR ADDRESS/LOCATION: 2708 Santiam Highway SE, Albany, OR MAP/TAX LOT: Linn County Assessor s Map No. 11S-03-08AD; Tax Lots 900, 1000 ZONING: TOTAL LAND AREA: EXISTING LAND USE: Community Commercial (CC) 29,594 square feet before right-of-way dedication / 28,029 square feet after right-ofway dedication (June 12, 2017, survey by SS Engineers) Retail Sales & Service (stereo store) Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 1

2 NEIGHBORHOOD: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING USES: PRIOR HISTORY: Santiam North: Community Commercial (CC) South: Community Commercial (CC) East: Community Commercial (CC) est: Community Commercial (CC) North: Convenience store and restaurants (across Santiam Highway) South: Drive-through restaurant, shopping center East: Restaurants, shopping center est: Bank, Fred Meyer (Across averly) SP-41-93: Site Plan Review approval for change of use from tire store to automotive dealership and used car lot SP26-98: Site Plan approval for placement of temporary espresso sales trailer NOTICE INFORMATION A Notice of Filing for this application was mailed on September 6, 2017, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the subject property. At the time the comment period ended on September 17, 2017, the Planning Division had received no written comments. STAFF ANALYSIS The staff analyses for the proposed Site Plan Review and Adjustment Review applications are presented below. The review criteria and applicable standards which must be met for this application to be approved are written in bold italics and are followed by findings, conclusions, and conditions of approval where conditions are necessary for compliance. The proposed Site Plan Review and Adjustment Review applications are subject to the provisions of the Albany Development Code (ADC) in effect when the application was submitted on July 26, SITE PLAN REVIE CRITERIA (ADC 2.450) Case File SP (1) Public utilities can accommodate the proposed development. FINDINGS OF FACT General 1.1 The proposed development site encompasses two parcels that are currently under common ownership. The applicant proposes blanket private utility, drainage, access, pedestrian, and parking easements for the benefit of both parcels. Condition of Approval 1 below and Condition of Approval 3 under Site Plan Review Criterion 3 will ensure the site is developed and the easements are recorded as proposed. Sanitary Sewer 1.2 City utility maps show eight-inch public sanitary sewer mains in Santiam Highway and averly Drive. 1.3 The existing development on the site is connected to the public sewer system. The applicant is proposing to use the existing private sewer service lateral to serve the dental office and install a new service to serve the restaurant. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 2

3 ater 1.4 City utility maps show 12-inch public water mains in Santiam Highway and averly Drive. 1.5 The existing development on the site is connected to the public water system. The applicant is proposing to use the existing private water service to serve the dental office and install a new service to serve the restaurant Storm Drainage 1.6 City utility maps show a 12-inch public storm drainage main in averly Drive and an 18-inch main in Santiam Highway. 1.7 The existing development on the site has a private stormwater collection system that is connected to the public storm drainage system. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing private system and reconstruct the parking areas. A new private storm drainage system will be installed with the new development. The applicant s plan shows connections to the drainage system in Santiam Highway and the system in averly Drive. The Santiam Highway system is under the jurisdiction of ODOT, and connection to this system will require approval from ODOT. CONCLUSIONS 1.1 Public sanitary sewer, water, and storm drainage facilities adjacent to the site can accommodate the proposed development. 1.2 This criterion will be met with the following conditions of approval to ensure compliance as proposed. CONDITIONS Condition 1 Criterion (2) General. The proposed development shall occur consistent with the plans and a written proposal submitted by the applicant, except as modified by approved revisions and conditions of approval and shall comply with all applicable state, federal, and local laws. The proposed post-construction stormwater quality facilities (private and/or public) can accommodate the proposed development, consistent with Title 12 of the Albany Municipal Code. FINDINGS OF FACT 2.1 Section of the Albany Municipal Code states that a post-construction stormwater quality permit shall be obtained for all new development and/or redevelopment projects on a parcel(s) equal to or greater than one acre, including all phases of the development (Ord , 2014). 2.2 Because the site is less than one acre, no stormwater quality facilities will be required for this development. CONCLUSIONS 2.1 The proposed development is exempt from the City s Storm ater Quality requirements. 2.2 This criterion is met without conditions. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 3

4 Criterion (3) The transportation system can safely and adequately accommodate the proposed development. FINDINGS OF FACT 3.1 The project site is located on the southeast corner of the Highway 20/averly Drive intersection and is currently developed with a 6,400 square-foot building used for a car stereo store. This project will construct a new 2,200 square-foot Starbucks restaurant, and convert 3,400 square feet of the existing building into a dental office. The remaining 3,000 square feet of the existing building will be demolished. 3.2 The intersection of Highway 20 and averly Drive is controlled by a traffic signal. 3.3 Highway 20 is classified as a principal arterial street, is under the jurisdiction of ODOT, and is improved to city standards along the frontage of the site. Improvements along the frontage of this site include curb, gutter, and sidewalk; two vehicle travel lanes in each direction; a westbound left-turn lane to averly Drive; and on-street bike lanes. 3.4 averly Drive is classified as a minor arterial street and is improved to city standards along the frontage of the site. Improvements include curb, gutter, and sidewalk; two vehicle travel lanes in each direction; a northbound left-turn lane to Highway 20; and on-street bike lanes. 3.5 The applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) with the application. The TIA was prepared by Sandow Engineering and is dated February 20, 2017, and was reviewed by both City and ODOT staff. The TIA estimated that, when complete, the development would add a total of 12 additional p.m. peak hour trips to the street system beyond what currently occurs with existing development on the site. 3.6 Albany s TIA guidelines call for submittal of a TIA for projects that generate 100 or more p.m. peak hour trips but allow staff to require a focused TIA for small projects when a specific traffic issue or concern is suspected. In this case, staff a TIA was submitted that looked at the performance and capacity of the Highway 20/averly Drive intersection, and the queue length that would occur at the new on-site drivethrough lane for Starbucks. 3.7 ODOT s performance standard for the Highway 20/averly Drive intersection is for a volume to capacity ratio (v/c) of The TIA found the intersection to be currently operating with a v/c of 0.60 in the a.m. peak hour, and 0.98 in the p.m. peak hour. ith the proposed development in place the intersection s v/c would be 0.65 in the a.m. peak hour, and 0.98 in the p.m. peak hour. The intersection will continue to operate below ODOT s performance standard in the a.m. peak hour. The intersection currently exceeds ODOT s performance standard in the p.m. hour, but the added traffic from this development will not make the intersection s p.m. performance worse. 3.8 Albany s 2010 Transportation System Plan (TSP) includes a future project adjoining this site. Project I26 will modify the Highway 20/averly Drive intersection to add a second northbound through vehicle lane. Construction of that project will require the acquisition of 12 feet of right-of-way along this site s west boundary. The applicant s site plan proposed dedication of the right-of-way with this project. CONCLUSIONS 3.1 The public street system adjoining the site is improved to city standards. 3.2 The development is projected to generate 12 additional p.m. peak hour vehicle trips per day. 3.3 The Highway 20/averly Drive intersection will operate within ODOT s performance standard during the a.m. peak hour. The intersection currently exceeds ODOT s performance standard during the p.m. peak hour, but will not worsen as a result of this development. 3.4 Albany s TSP identifies a future project adjoining this site. Project I26 will add a second northbound Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 4

5 through vehicle lane to averly Drive, and require the acquisition of an additional 12 feet of public right-of-way. The applicant s site plan proposed dedication of that right-of-way. 3.5 This criterion is satisfied with the following condition. CONDITIONS Condition 2 Right-of-ay Dedication. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate 12 feet of public right-of-way along the site s west boundary as shown on the approved site plan. Criterion (4) Parking areas and entrance-exit points are designed to facilitate traffic and pedestrian safety and avoid congestion. FINDINGS OF FACT 4.1 The site has two existing driveway approaches. One is located on averly Drive at the south end of the site, and the other is located on Highway 20 roughly mid-way along site s frontage. The proposed site plan shows both driveways being removed and reconstructed at close to the same locations. 4.2 The proposed driveway to averly Drive will be limited to right turn movements in and out due to the presence of a concrete median island in averly Drive. The size and location of the driveway comply with the design standards contained in ADC The proposed driveway to Highway 20 was reviewed by both City and ODOT staff. Concerns regarding this approach included the potential for blockage due to queuing from the drive-through lane proposed for the Starbucks restaurant and conflicts between driveway turn movements and intersection operations for the traffic signal at the Highway 20/averly Drive intersection. This segment of Highway 20 has also been identified by ODOT as a high crash segment and is included on the statewide Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) list. 4.4 The applicant s TIA estimated that the longest queue in the drive-through lane would occur during the a.m. peak hour. The 95th percentile queue was estimated to consist of 11 vehicles. The site plan proposed by the applicant provides for storage of 11 vehicles in the queue lane without blocking the sidewalk or the site s driveway to Highway During their review of the project, ODOT noted that there is a safety project in the state Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that would modify the Highway 20/averly drive intersection. The improvements will include construction of a median island barrier in Highway 20 that would effectively limit driveway movements at this site to right in and right out. The timing for construction of the improvement is uncertain but should occur within the next two to three years. Elimination of left turns at this site s driveway is desirable in order to minimize conflicts with traffic signal operations and because of the high crash rate along the corridor. ODOT staff have indicated a willingness to consider a driveway permit to Highway 20 for the site as long as provisions are included in site design that limits movements to right in and right out. 4.6 The applicant proposes to record blanket easements benefitting both parcels for pedestrian and vehicle access, parking, and utilities within the development site. Since the subject site involves two separate parcels and access, parking, and landscaping are designed to be shared, the blanket easements are needed. Condition of Approval 6 ensures that private easements for shared access, parking, and landscaping will be established as proposed 4.7 In addition to meeting Albany s ADC code requirements for access and parking areas, the project must comply with applicable Oregon Fire Code (OFC) requirements in order for building permits to be issued. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 5

6 Approved fire apparatus roadways must extend to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of any structure that will be built on the property as measured by an approved route of travel around the exterior of the structure. Fire Department Staff indicate that on-site emergency access will be required for fire and emergency service. Because the subject site involves two separate parcels and access is shared, an Emergency Vehicle Access Easement is needed to allow access over the approved route of travel within the site. Condition 7 will ensure the on-site access accommodates emergency vehicles as required 4.8 Vehicle Parking Required Number of Spaces. Per ADC 9.020, Table 1, medical and dental office uses require one off-street parking space for every 250 square feet of floor area and drive-through or drive-in restaurants require one off-street parking space for every 100 square feet of floor area. The floor area to be measured is exclusive of vent shafts, courtyards, stairwells, elevator shafts, restrooms, and storage rooms and rooms designed and used for storage and operation of maintenance equipment. Fractional space requirements are to be counted to the nearest whole space, with half spaces rounded up. The total may include required ADA spaces and up to 40 percent of spaces may be compact. ADC 9.030(4) and allow a ten percent reduction in the number of spaces required based on the ratio for development with a multiple tenants or uses. 4.9 Based on the proposed net floor area of 3,375 square feet for the dental office use and 1,644 square feet for the proposed drive-through restaurant use, the proposed development requires a minimum of 30 off-street parking spaces. ith the ten percent reduction for multi-tenant and mixed-use developments provided in ADC 9.030(4), 27 spaces are required. Required ADA spaces and up to 12 compact spaces may be included in the total The applicant proposes 30 spaces total, including 12 compact stalls and two ADA stalls. Since parking and access for both parcels are shared and do not meet all applicable standards independently, the proposed blanket easement for shared access and parking is necessary. Condition 6 will ensure compliance with applicable standards Parking Lot Design and Construction. ADC includes standards for parking areas and loading areas. All required parking, including travel aisles and access, shall have a durable, dust-free surface of asphalt, cement concrete, or other approved materials approved by the Director of Public orks; a drainage system; perimeter curb; wheel bumpers; and striping. ADC includes dimensional standards for parking lots. The applicant proposes adjustment review approval to allow for a 24 9 travel aisle width for the parking area between the dental office and restaurant buildings instead of the 26-foot width required per ADC Table 9-2. As detailed in the staff evaluation for the Adjustment Review application provided at the end of this report, incorporated here by reference, the proposed drive aisle width meets the criteria for approval of the adjustment. The proposed parking lot design will meet all other applicable minimum dimensional standards as detailed on the applicant s site plans, with consideration of the additional findings and conditions provided below specific to ADC 9.120(9) regarding connections to adjacent properties, ADC 9.130(5) regarding storage length, ADC Table 9-2 regarding dead-end back up space and aisle width, and ADC 9.120(13)-(15) concerning bicycle parking, pedestrian access, and parking lot landscaping. These standards are addressed in Finding of Fact below and Finding of Fact 5.8 and 5.13 under Criterion Per ADC 9.130(4), driveway and on-site maneuvering and loading areas for commercial developments shall include 20 feet of storage length for entering and exiting vehicles in order to prevent vehicles from backing into the flow of traffic on the public street or causing unsafe conflicts with on-site circulation. The applicant s revised Site Plan Sheet C1.0 (Attachment B.19) submitted on October 5, 2017, includes minor revisions and dimensions that demonstrate the proposed layout, and in particular, the storage length between Highway 20 and the northernmost parking, stall meets this standard. Condition Approval 8 will ensure these revisions are reflected in the building permit submittal. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 6

7 4.13 ADC 9.120(9) provides that parking areas must be designed to connect to existing or future adjacent parking areas in the same zoning district where practical. The proposed parking lot is designed to connect to a future parking area on the adjacent property rather than terminating with a dead-end. The proposed two-foot backup area and a 33-foot wide travel aisle will accommodate the needs of exiting vehicles until such time that a connection is made on the adjoining properties, as shown on detailed on Sheet A1.00 of the applicant s site plans ADC Table 9-2 provides that parking lot dead-ends must provide a five-foot back-up area. In this instance, the five-foot backup space for parking is not required because the proposed parking travel aisles either connect with adjacent streets or are designed to provide a connection to the adjoining property in the future without the need for an additional backup area Bicycle Parking. ADC 9.120(13) requires commercial and office developments to provide one bicycle parking space for every ten automobile spaces required, with a minimum of two spaces. Based on the requirement for 30 vehicle parking spaces, or 27 spaces with a ten percent reduction for mixed-use development, three bicycle parking spaces are required, two of which must be covered. The site plans show two covered bicycle spaces near the main entrance to the restaurant building and two spaces near the main entrance to the dental office building. Based on the applicant s site plans, and the bike parking detail on Sheet A0.01 (Attachment B.17), the required overhead and three-foot side clearances appear to be provided and allow for the installation of a fully loaded rack that is securely fastened to the ground and capable of supporting each bicycle as specified in ADC 9.120(13). Condition of Approval 9 will ensure the required bicycle parking is installed prior to building occupancy Loading Standards. ADC requires loading spaces for all uses greater than 5,000 square feet except for office and residential use. Since the proposed development is for buildings smaller than 5,000 square feet, one of which is designed for office use, no additional loading spaces are required Pedestrian Access. ADC 9.120(15) states that walkways and access ways shall be provided in all new off-street parking lots and additions to connect sidewalks adjacent to the development to the entrance of new buildings. The site abuts two public streets. Pedestrian walkways from each building entrance are provided through the parking areas to both abutting public streets. CONCLUSIONS 4.1 The development will remove and reconstruct a driveway approach on both averly Drive and Highway The proposed driveways to averly Drive and Highway 20 comply with the design and location standards contained in ADC The proposed site plan provides adequate storage in the driveway through-lane to avoid blocking the sidewalk or the site s driveway to Highway ith the provision of an Emergency Vehicle Access Easement, emergency vehicles will be able to enter and exit the site without blocking the sidewalk or traffic lanes on adjacent streets. 4.5 The proposed driveway to Highway 20 will require the issuance of an access permit from ODOT. Because of the high crash rate on the highway and in order to avoid turn movement conflicts with the traffic signal at averly Drive, movements at the driveway need to be restricted to right in and right out. 4.6 As a single development with shared parking and access, a total of 27 parking spaces are required for the mix of uses on the site. 4.7 A total of three bicycle spaces are required for the proposed development and will be provided in Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 7

8 accordance with applicable standards. 4.8 The proposed parking areas will comply with the applicable standards for parking lot design and construction with the approved Adjustment Review application for a 24 9 travel aisle width between the proposed restaurant and dental office building. 4.9 Pedestrian connections are provided throughout the site, to and from both adjacent streets, and to adjacent properties via public sidewalks within the adjacent streets This criterion is satisfied with the following conditions to ensure compliance, as proposed. CONDITIONS Condition 3 Condition 4 Condition 5 Condition 6 Condition 7 Condition 8 Condition 9 Access permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall secure an access permit from ODOT for the site s driveway to Highway 20. Access Requirements. The proposed driveway to Highway 20 shall include: Installation and maintenance of a Right Turn Only sign for exiting movements out of the driveway. Installation and maintenance of a right turn pavement directional arrow out of the driveway. Driveway Approaches. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall remove and replace the site s existing driveway approaches to averly Drive and Highway 20 as shown on the approved site plan. Private Easements. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for Building Division review and approval a draft copy of the blanket private utility, drainage, access, pedestrian, and parking easements benefitting both parcels. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded easements. Emergency Access. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for Fire Department review and approval for an Emergency Vehicle Access Easement recorded on the affected parcels. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Emergency Vehicle Access Easement. The easement shall require that the easement area shall be maintained by the owners and for purposes of ingress and egress to provide, without limitation, fire protection, ambulances, rescue services, and other lawful governmental or private emergency services to the premises, owners, occupants, and invitees thereof and said easement shall be made part of any submittal. Storage Length. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the site plans shall be revised to show a 20-foot storage length for entering and existing vehicles along Highway 20, in accordance with ADC 9.130(5), and as shown on Site Plan Sheet C1.0 (Attachment B.19) submitted on October 5, Bicycle Parking. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a total of three bicycle parking spaces shall be installed, with at least two sheltered, in conformance with the requirements at ADC 9.120(13). If occupancy is requested for one building prior to the other, at least two spaces must be provided at that time in conformance with the requirements at ADC 9.120(13). Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 8

9 Criterion (5) The design and operating characteristics of the proposed development are reasonably compatible with surrounding development and land uses, and any negative impacts have been sufficiently minimized. FINDINGS OF FACT 5.1 Surrounding Development. The subject site is located in a commercial area along Highway 20 and surrounding by CC zoning and commercial uses, with public streets along the north and west site boundaries. No residential dwellings existing in the vicinity of the subject site. The property abutting the east and south site boundary is at the northern end of a larger shopping center and is developed with a restaurant to the east of the subject site, a drive-through restaurant to the south of the subject site and a multi-tenant commercial building with a mix of commercial and office uses. To the north across Highway 20, are a convenience market, ice cream store, and fast food restaurant. To the west across averly Street, is a bank located at the northeast corner of the Fred Meyer parking lot. 5.3 Operating Characteristics. The subject site encompasses approximately 0.68 acres in the CC zoning district located at the southeast corner of Highway 20 and averly Drive. The proposed drive-through restaurant and dental office building are permitted outright in the CC zone subject to Site Plan Review approval and will have operating characteristics that are similar to the other commercial and office uses in the surrounding area. 5.4 Building and Parking Lot Setbacks. ADC 4.090, Table 1, provides that in the CC zoning district the minimum building setback from a front property line is 10 feet and there is no interior yard setback from property lines that do not abut a residential zoning district. Per ADC parking and loading spaces may not be located in a required front or side setback. The proposed development meets applicable setback requirements, with only landscaping, driveways, and pedestrian connections located in the front yard setbacks. 5.5 Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage in the CC zoning district is 90 percent. Lot coverage includes all impervious surfaces, building footprints, eave overhangs, parking, access, and sidewalks. As indicated on the applicant s Site Plan sheet C1.0 (Attachment B.19), 78 percent (21,874 square feet) of the total site area (28,029 square feet) will be covered with such impervious surfaces. The remaining 22 percent (6,155 square feet) will be landscaped area, in accordance with the lot coverage standard. 5.6 Building Height. The maximum building height in the CC zoning district is 50 feet unless the Airport Approach Overlay restrictions dictate a lower height. In this instance, the 50-foot height limitation applies, and the elevation drawing shows that both buildings will be less than 22 feet tall and meet the standard. 5.7 Landscaping Required Non-Residential. The Non-Residential landscape requirements at ADC 9.140(2) provide that all required front and interior setbacks, exclusive of access ways and other permitted intrusions, must be landscaped before an occupancy permit will be issued. Minimum landscaping acceptable for every 1,000 square feet of required setbacks in all commercial and industrial districts is as follows: (1) One tree at least six feet tall for every 30 feet of street frontage. (2) Five five-gallon or eight one-gallon shrubs, trees, or accent plants. (3) The remaining area treated with suitable, living ground cover, lawn, or decorative treatment of bark, rock, or another attractive ground cover. (4) hen the yard adjacent to a street of an industrially zoned property is across a right-of-way from other industrially or commercially zoned property, only 30 percent of such setback area must be landscaped. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 9

10 In this instance, the buffering standards from ADC also apply within ten-foot front yard areas along averly Drive and Highway 20 and set a higher standard for front yard landscaping than the requirements of ADC 9.140(2). 5.8 Buffering and Screening. ADC and Table 9-4 contain buffering and screening provisions intended to reduce impacts on adjacent uses of a different type. No screening is required for commercial uses that abut properties with commercial zoning. For commercial uses that abut arterials, a ten-foot landscape buffer is required. Per ADC 9.240, the buffer shall include: (1) At least one row of trees. These trees will be not less than ten feet high at the time of planting for deciduous trees and spaced not more than 30 feet apart and five feet high at the time of planting for evergreen trees and spaced not more than 15 feet apart. This requirement may be waived by the Director when it can be demonstrated that such trees would conflict with other purposes of this Code (e.g. solar access). (2) At least five five-gallon shrubs or ten one-gallon shrubs for every 1,000 square feet of required buffer area. (3) The remaining area treated with attractive ground cover (e.g., lawn, bark, rock, ivy, evergreen shrubs). Buffering is required in the front yards along averly Drive and Highway 20 since both streets are arterials. The applicant s preliminary landscape and irrigation plan (Sheet C3.0, Attachment B.21) calculates the ten-foot buffer area along averly Drive to include a 114-foot by ten-foot area totaling 1,140 square feet excluding the driveway. The plan indicates that a minimum of four trees at least ten feet high at the time of planting, six five-gallon shrubs or twelve one-gallon shrubs with the remaining area to be treated with groundcover, lawn or decorative bark or rock will be provided, as required. The applicant calculates the ten-foot buffer area along Highway 20 to include a 165-foot by ten-foot area totaling 1,650 square feet excluding the driveway. The plan indicates that a minimum of six trees at least ten-feet high at the time of planting, nine five-gallon shrubs or 18 one-gallon shrubs with the remaining area to be treated with groundcover, lawn or decorative bark or rock will be provided, as required. The landscaping indicated on the applicant s preliminary landscape plan will meet the applicable landscaping and buffering requirements of ADC 9.140(2) and ADC and Table 9-4. Conditions of Approval 11 and 12 will ensure compliance. 5.9 Landscaping within Parking Lot. Per ADC 9.150, parking lots must be landscaped in accordance with the following minimum standards: (1) Planter Bays. Parking areas shall be divided into bays of not more than 12 parking spaces. At both ends of each parking bay, there shall be curbed planters at least five (5) feet wide, excluding the curb. Each planter shall contain one canopy tree at least ten feet high and decorative groundcover containing at least two (2) shrubs for every 100 square feet of landscape area. Neither planter bays nor their contents may impede access on required public sidewalks or paths, or handicapped-accessible parking spaces. (2) Entryway Landscaping. Both sides of a parking lot entrance shall be bordered by a minimum five (5)-foot-wide landscape planter strip meeting the same landscaping provisions as planter bays, except that no sight-obscuring trees or shrubs are permitted. (3) Parking Space Buffers. Parking areas shall be separated from the exterior wall of a structure by pedestrian walkways or loading areas or by a five-foot strip of landscaping materials. (4) Alternate Plan. An alternate plan may be submitted that provides landscaping of at least five percent of the total parking area exclusive of required landscaped yard areas and that separates parking areas of more than 100 spaces into clusters divided by landscape strips. Each planter area shall contain one tree at least ten feet tall and decorative ground cover containing at least two shrubs for every 100 square feet of landscape area. Landscaping may not impede access on required public sidewalks or paths, or handicapped-accessible parking spaces. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 10

11 Sheet C3.0 (Attachment B.21) of the applicant s site plans shows required front yard buffer landscaping and provides parking lot landscaping calculations for the Alternative Plan option provided in ADC 9.150(4). The calculations indicate 739 square feet of parking lot landscaping is required to meet the five percent standard based on a total parking area of 14,771 square feet, including all paved parking and maneuvering areas. Per the calculations, 1,621 square feet (11 percent of the parking area) of the parking lot landscaping will be provided in the interior of the site adjacent to parking and maneuvering areas, with each planter area noted as having a tree, two shrubs per 100 feet and decorative ground cover. The plans provide calculations for additional areas outside of the interior of the lot that would increase the coverage to more than 17 percent. Landscape details are not provided for these areas on the plan and are not needed since the five percent standard is met without them. Condition of Approval 11 and 12 will ensure compliance with the parking lot landscape standards, as proposed. The applicant s representative has indicated to Planning staff that canopy trees may prove problematic in the planter area near the entrance to the drive-through lane. It is noted that the Alternative Plan option for parking lot landscaping does not specify that trees within the planter areas be canopy trees. Because canopy trees provide more shade and better serve the purpose of parking lot landscaping, they are recommended where feasible Irrigation System. ADC requires that all required landscape areas be provided with a piped underground irrigation system unless a licensed landscape architect or certified nurseryman submit written verification that the proposed plant materials do not require irrigation. The preliminary landscape plan indicates that all landscape areas are to be provided with an underground irrigations system via a new domestic service with a double check backflow devise. The proposed blanket utility easement benefitting both parcels enables irrigation lines to cross the parcel boundaries within the development site Signs. Signage is reviewed separately from this Site Plan Review application. The Planning Division will review applications for sign permits when they are submitted to the Building Division. See ADC for regulations regarding sign size and number allowances in the CC zoning district Screening of Refuse Containers. ADC requires that any refuse container or disposal area that would be visible from a public street, customer, or resident parking area, any public facility, or any residential area, be screened from view by placement of a sight-obscuring fence, wall, or hedge at least six feet tall. All refuse materials must be contained within the screened area. Refuse disposal areas may not be located in required setbacks or buffer yards. The applicant s site plans show a trash container on the south side of the dental office building and along the south property line near averly Drive. Plan notes and details provided on Sheet A3.01 (Attachment B.24) show the enclosures will be obscured from public view by a six-foot-tall concrete block wall with a solid metal gate as required Environmental Standards. ADC include environmental standards related to noise, visible emissions, vibrations, odors, glare, heat, insects, rodents, and hazardous waste. No adverse environmental impacts are expected from this development Lighting and Glare. ADC 9.120(14) states that any lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area must be arranged to reflect the light away from any abutting or adjacent residential district. See ADC for glare and heat regulations. ADC requires on-site lighting to be arranged so that light is reflected away from adjoining properties and/or streets. The applicant s submittal indicates that the proposed lighting will be mounted on the building or in-ground up lights and will not produce glare on the adjacent properties. Condition of Approval 10 will ensure exterior lighting will comply with standards. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 11

12 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 The operating characteristics of the proposed drive-through restaurant and dental office development are similar to those of surrounding commercial and office uses. 5.2 Any adverse impacts associated with the use of the property are mitigated through compliance with applicable development standards. 5.3 The proposed development will meet the standards for building height, setbacks, outside storage, refuse containers, and environmental standards. 5.4 The preliminary landscape and irrigation plan demonstrates conceptual compliance with applicable landscaping, parking lot landscaping, and buffering standards. 5.5 No signage has been reviewed as part of the Site Plan Review request. Any proposed signage will be reviewed when sign permits are submitted. 5.4 ith conditions of approval to ensure compliance, the proposed development will meet standards for outdoor lighting. 5.6 The design and operating characteristics of the proposed development will be reasonably compatible with surrounding development with the following conditions of approval to ensure the development occurs as proposed and in compliance with applicable standards. CONDITIONS Condition 10 Condition 11 Condition 12 Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting fixtures, including pole mounted lights, shall be of a shielded, full cut-off design. Final Landscape & Irrigation Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the City Planning Division for review and approval. The final plan shall include planting and irrigation details, dimensions, and calculations, and notes as necessary to verify the required landscape standards of ADC 9.140(2), 9.150(4), and the screening and buffering standards of ADC and Table 9-4 are satisfied. The plans shall include notes demonstrating compliance with the Alternative Plan standards at ADC 9.150(4) with respect to the size of the trees at the time of planting (ten feet minimum), the square footage, and the number of shrubs for each planting area (two shrubs per 100 feet). In lieu of irrigation details, the applicant may provide written documentation from a licensed landscape architect, landscape construction professional, or certified nurseryman verifying the proposed plants do not require irrigation and make note of that on the final landscape and irrigation plan. Completion Guarantee. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all proposed and required site improvements, including the installation of required landscaping and irrigation, shall be completed in accordance with approved plans or guaranteed in accordance with ADC Any changes to approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the Albany Planning Division and be in compliance with ADC landscaping standards. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 12

13 Criterion (6) Activities and developments within special purpose districts must comply with the regulations described in Articles 4 (Airport Approach), 6 (Natural Resources), and 7 (Historic), as applicable. FINDINGS OF FACT 6.1 Article 4 Airport Approach. The subject property is located within the Airport Horizontal Surface area as indicated on the Albany Municipal Airport Approach and Clear Zone plan. The highest elevation on the property is currently about 226 feet (NGVD 1929), according to the City s topographical records. The proposed development will extend less than 25 feet above that elevation, well below the Airport Horizontal Surface area at 372 feet above mean sea level. 6.2 Article 6 Natural Resources. The site is not within the Open Space zoning district, the Floodplain Overlay District, the Hillside Development Overlay District, or the illamette River Greenway Overlay District; nor does the site contain a Riparian Corridor overlay, Habitat Assessment overlay, or etland overlay. FEMA/FIRM Community Panel No C0214H revised December 8, 2016, and No C527G, dated September 29, 2010, show that this property is in Zone X, an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. 6.3 Article 7 Historic Districts. Comprehensive Plan Plate 9 shows the subject property is not in any historic district. There are no known archaeological sites on the property. CONCLUSIONS 6.1 The subject property is located in the Airport Horizontal Surface area; however, no development will penetrate the Airport Conical Surface area. 6.2 There are no other special purpose districts to consider on this site. 6.3 This criterion is satisfied without conditions. Criterion (7) The site is in compliance with prior land use approvals. FINDINGS OF FACT 7.1 Available records indicate that Site Plan review approval was granted for a change of use from a tire store to an automotive dealership and used car lot in 1993 (SP-41-93) and for temporary placement of an espresso sales trailer in 1998 (SP-26-98). The subject site is not occupied by either approved use. CONCLUSIONS 7.1 The previous land use approvals are not applicable in this instance. The site is not developed with an automotive dealership or espresso sales trailer, and the applicant is proposing to redevelop the site for dental office and drive-through restaurant use in accordance with current Albany Development Code requirements. 7.2 This criterion is satisfied without conditions. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 13

14 Criterion (8) Sites that have lost their nonconforming status must be brought into compliance and may be brought into compliance incrementally in accordance with Section FINDINGS OF FACT 8.1 Section of the ADC states, Sites that are nonconforming with the current development standards and that have lost their nonconforming status are required to bring the site into compliance with current Code standards. Incremental improvements are allowed in accordance with Subsection (1). 8.2 The site has not lost its nonconforming status. CONCLUSION 8.1 This criterion is not applicable. COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN STANDARDS (ADC ) In addition to the review criteria above, the following Design Standards must be met. Note: If there is a checked box symbol () preceding a standard, it means that staff has compared the applicant s findings and plans to the standard(s) and find the standard(s) is met without comment. If the box is unchecked (), staff has provided findings and conclusions as to the reason(s) why the standard is not met and has added a condition. "N/A" preceding the standard means it is not applicable to this particular development Building Orientation (ADC 8.330). Building orientation and maximum setback standards are established to help create an attractive streetscape and pleasant pedestrian environment. (1) New buildings shall be oriented to existing or new public streets. Building orientation is demonstrated by placing buildings and their public entrances close to streets so pedestrians have a direct and convenient route from the street sidewalk to building entrances. (a) On sites smaller than three acres, new buildings shall be oriented to the public street/sidewalk and off-street parking shall be located to the side or rear of the building(s), except where it is not feasible due to limited or no street frontage, the site is an infill site less than one acre, conservation of natural resources, or where there are access restrictions. (b) Buildings on sites larger than three acres may be setback from the public street and oriented to traffic aisles on private property, if the on-site circulation system is developed like a public street with pedestrian access, landscape strips and street trees. (2) Customer entrances should be clearly defined, highly visible, using features such as canopies, porticos, arcades, arches, wing walls, and planters. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSION: The proposed development site is an infill site less than one acre at the corner of two arterials with access control. The existing building and parking area are proposed to be modified in order to accommodate the development of a restaurant with a drive-through. Per ADC Table 4-1 and ADC 8.350(3), drive-through restaurants are permitted in the CC zone and travel aisles may be located between the building and the sidewalk where drive-through windows are permitted or on infill sites less than an acre like the subject site. The proposed building is oriented to adjacent streets to the extent feasible given site constraints. The building and drive-through aisle are as proposed near both streets, with parking to the side and rear of the building. Although the primary customer entrance to the building is oriented to the interior parking area on the east of the building, the entrance is readily accessed via a pedestrian connection to the adjacent streets. Also, a second customer entrance is provided on the south side of the building. Both entrances are highly visible and clearly defined with canopies and other features. The primary entrance on the existing building to remain is at the northwest building corner, is oriented to both Highway 20 and the interior parking area, and is also highly visible, and clearly defined with a recessed entry. These criteria are met. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 14

15 General Building Design (ADC 8.340). New commercial buildings shall provide architectural relief and interest, with emphasis at building entrances and along sidewalks, to promote and enhance a comfortable pedestrian scale and orientation. Blank walls shall be avoided, except when not feasible. (1) Ground floor windows shall be provided along frontages adjacent to sidewalks. The main front elevation(s) of buildings shall provide windows or transparency at the pedestrian level in the following minimum proportions: CC District 25 percent transparency. The minimum window and door requirements are measured between 2 and 8 feet from the ground. Only the glass portion of doors may be used in the calculation. (2) alls that are visible from a public street shall include a combination of architectural elements and features such as offsets, windows, entry treatments, wood siding, brick stucco, synthetic stucco, textured concrete block, textured concrete, and landscaping. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSION: The proposed development has street frontage on two sides of the subject site, with a shared parking area situated along Highway 20 between the proposed restaurant and dental office. The only new building proposed is the restaurant building. The new restaurant building s main front elevation with the primary customer entrance faces the parking area to the east. The applicant s elevation drawings (Sheet A3.01) indicate the 25 percent transparency requirement will be met on the east elevation with more than 83 percent of the wall area between two and eight feet having transparent glazing. The south elevation with the other customer entrance to the building also exceeds the 25 percent transparency standard, with more than 37 percent of the wall area between two feet and eight from the ground having transparent glazing. The north elevation fronts a sidewalk and has a window as required. The west elevation has a drive-through window and fronts the drive-through lane rather than a sidewalk. All building elevations are visible from the street and have a combination of architectural elements to provide visual interest, including steel canopies, glazing, and different siding materials. In addition, the parapets of the buildings vary in height. Per the applicant, open areas around the building and between the parking area will be landscaped and the west elevations will have architectural trellis features. The proposed architectural elements of landscaping on the north and west side of the building and trellis features on the west elevation on the portions of the elevation are necessary because both elevations are the most visible from adjacent streets and have wall sections without windows. Condition of Approval 12 will ensure the foundation plantings and architectural trellis features are provided as proposed. The existing building on the site will be modified and made smaller to accommodate additional parking on the site. The primary customer entrance will remain facing the northwest corner of the building and the main front elevation facing Highway 20 to the north will continue to meet current transparency standards for new buildings with more than 83 percent of the wall area between two feet and eight from the ground having transparent glazing. The west elevation fronts a sidewalk and parking area and is visible from the street with glazed double doors at the corner and a combination of architectural elements that provide visual interest including a parapet on the northern portion of the building and a mix of exterior materials. The east and west walls of the building do not have windows, offsets, or architectural features and offsets of note and none are proposed. Given that no changes are proposed to the west elevation and the new south wall is on the back of the building, and has no customer entrance and is largely not visible from adjacent streets, no additional features are required to meet the general building design standards. The proposal will meet the general building design standards will be met as conditioned. Street Connectivity and Internal Circulation (ADC 8.350). The standards apply to both public and private streets. (1) New commercial buildings may be required to provide street or driveway stubs and reciprocal access easements to promote efficient circulation between uses and properties, and to promote connectivity and dispersal of traffic. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 15

16 (2) The internal vehicle circulation system of a commercial development shall continue the adjacent public street pattern wherever possible and promote street connectivity. The vehicle circulation system shall mimic a traditional local street network and break the development into numerous smaller blocks. (3) Traffic aisles shall not be located between the building(s) and the sidewalk(s), except as provided in (4) below, or where drive-through windows are permitted, sites are constrained by natural resources, or are infill sites less than one acre. (4) here drop off facilities are provided, they shall be designed to meet the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act but still provide for direct pedestrian circulation. (5) Internal roadways shall be designed to slow traffic speeds. This can be achieved by keeping road widths to a minimum, allowing parallel parking, and planting street trees to visually narrow the road. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION: The subject property is less than one acre and public streets abut the north and west property lines. The applicant proposes a blanket shared access and parking easements for the benefit of both parcels within the development site to promote connectivity and efficient circulation between uses within the site. The proposed onsite circulation system includes a stub to the east property line that will enable a connection with the adjoining property to the east and south in conjunction with further development or redevelopment of the parcel. Vehicle access is proposed via existing driveways on Highway 20 and averly Drive, and maintains the block symmetry of the established street grid and existing internal vehicle circulation. The allowed drive-through aisle along the north and west side of the restaurant is the only traffic aisle located between onsite buildings and sidewalks in abutting public streets. No drop off facilities or internal roadways are proposed. These standards are met. Pedestrian Amenities (ADC 8.360). (1) All new commercial structures and improvements to existing sites shall provide pedestrian amenities. The number of pedestrian amenities shall comply with the following sliding scale. Size of Structure or Improvement Number of Amenities Less than 5,000 square feet 1 5,000 10,000 square feet 2 10,001 50,000 square feet 3 (2) Acceptable pedestrian amenities include the following improvements. No more than two of any item may be used to fulfill the requirement: (a) Sidewalks at least ten feet wide with ornamental treatments (e.g., brick pavers), or sidewalks which are 50 percent wider than required by the Code. (b) Benches and public outdoors seating for at least four people. (c) Sidewalk planter(s) enclosing a total of eight square feet. (d) Pocket parks or decorative gardens (minimum usable area of 300 square feet). (e) Plazas (minimum usable area of 300 square feet). (f) Street trees that are 50 percent larger than required by the Code. (g) eather protection (awnings, etc.). (h) Other pedestrian amenities that are not listed but are similar in scale and benefit. (3) Pervious pedestrian amenities can include approved vegetated post-construction stormwater quality improvements. (4) Pedestrian amenities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Amenities shall be located outside the building main entrance, along pedestrian corridors, or near transit stops. Amenities shall be visible and accessible to the general public from an improved public or private street. Access to pocket parks, plazas, and sidewalks must be provided via a public right-of-way or a public access easement. (b) Amenities are not subject to setback requirements. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 16

17 (c) Amenities are consistent with the character and scale of surrounding developments. For example, similarity in awning height, bench style, planter materials, street trees, and pavers is recommended to foster continuity in the design of pedestrian areas. Materials should be suitable for outdoor use, easily maintained, and have a reasonably long life cycle (e.g., 10 years before replacement). FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSION: Two pedestrian amenities are required for the proposed development based on a total gross floor area of approximately 5,700 square feet for the new and modified building. The proposal indicates three or more pedestrian amenities will be provided, including weather protection along the east elevation and over the south entrance foto the restaurant building and a six-foot bench providing seating for four persons adjacent to the dental office building. These amenities will satisfy the standard and are shown on the site plans. The applicant may change or add to the preliminary choice of pedestrian amenities. The proposed development meets these standards. Pedestrian Connections (ADC 8.370). (1) New retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops shall provide for convenient pedestrian access to transit. (2) alkways shall be provided connecting building entrances and streets adjoining the site. (3) Pedestrian connections to adjoining properties shall be provided except where such a connection is impractical. Pedestrian connections shall connect the on-site circulation system to existing or proposed streets, walkways, and driveways that abut the property. here adjacent properties are undeveloped or have potential of redevelopment, streets, access ways and walkways on site shall be laid out or stubbed to allow for extension the adjoining property. (4) On sites at major transit stops provide the following: (a) Either locate buildings within 20 feet of the transit stop, a transit street or an intersecting street or provide a pedestrian plaza at the transit stop or a street intersection. (b) A reasonable direct pedestrian connection between the transit stop and building entrances on the site. (c) A transit passenger landing pad accessible to the disabled. (d) An easement or dedication for a passenger shelter if requested by the transit provider. (e) Lighting at the transit stop. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSION: The subject site is located at the intersection of two streets with transit service, with the nearest transit stop located over 400 feet to the south along averly Drive. Pedestrian walkways are proposed between all building entrances and sidewalks in adjacent streets. Pedestrian walkways are provided via sidewalks, with the exception of the accessible routes proposed across the front of the drive-through aisle, across the accessible parking aisles and drive aisle between the two buildings, and in front of the trash enclosure on the south side of the dental office building. Pedestrian connections to the abutting property to the south and east are provided via the public sidewalks along averly Drive and Highway 20. The adjoining property does not include pedestrian connections to the subject site and the only additional connections from the subject site to the adjoining property that would be practical would be via the sidewalk proposed on the south side of the dental office building. This sidewalk extends within two feet of the property line and could be extended when a connection on the adjoining property is provided. This standard is met. N/A Large Parking Areas (ADC 8.380). The amount of parking needed for larger commercial development can result in a large expanse of pavement. Landscaping in a parking area shall be incorporated in a manner that is both attractive and easy to maintain, minimizes the visual impact of surface parking, and improves environmental and climatic impacts (Figure 8-6). In addition to the provisions of Article 9, the following standards apply to commercial development when more than 75 parking spaces are proposed and/or modified. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 17

18 (1) alkways are necessary for persons who will access the site by walking, biking or transit. A continuous pedestrian walkway at least 7 feet wide shall be provided from the primary frontage sidewalk to the customer entrance for each building. This internal walkway shall incorporate a mix of landscaping, benches, drop-off bays and bicycle facilities for at least 50 percent of the length of the walkway. The walkways must be designed for access by disabled persons. If the walkway crosses a parking area or vehicle aisle, the standards in Subsection (2) below apply. (2) For the safety of pedestrians, parking lots shall be designed to separate pedestrians from vehicles and include protected pedestrian walkways from parking areas to building entrances. alkways shall be protected by landscaping, curbs, or parking bumpers. alkways may cross a vehicle aisle if distinguished by a color, texture or elevation different from the parking and driving areas. alkways shall not share a vehicle aisle. (3) The parking area shall be divided into pods of no more than 75spaces each with landscape strips, peninsulas, or grade separations to reduce the visual impact of large expanses of paving, to direct vehicular traffic through the parking lot, and to provide a location for pedestrian walkways. (4) Pods may have access at one or both ends. A pod may be U-shaped with double access at one end. (5) Pods shall be separated with physical breaks by providing one or more of the following: building pads, pedestrian walkways, landscape strips, landscaped pedestrian walkways, interior streets or accessways. (a) Pedestrian walkways used for pod separation shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 5 feet with no car overhang; 7' 6" wide for car overhang on one side; or 10 feet wide with a car overhang on both sides. (b) Landscape strips used for pod separation shall have a minimum landscape strip width of 5 feet with no car overhang; 7' 6" wide for car overhang on one side; or 10 feet wide with a car overhang on both sides. (c) Landscaped pedestrian walkways used for pod separation shall have a minimum unobstructed walkway width of 5 feet. Landscaping may be on one or both sides of a pedestrian walkway, with a minimum landscape strip width of 5 feet when provided. Compatibility Details (ADC 8.390). Commercial development shall be designed to comply with the following applicable details and any other details warranted by the local conditions: (1) On-site lighting is arranged so that light is reflected away from adjoining properties and/or streets. (2) Any undesirable impacts produced on the site, such as noise, glare, odors, dust or vibrations have been adequately screened from adjacent properties. (3) The site is protected from any undesirable impacts that are generated on abutting properties. (4) Unsightly exterior improvements and items such as trash receptacles, exterior vents and mechanical devices have been adequately screened. (5) Storage areas, trash collection facilities and noise generating equipment are located away from public streets, abutting residential districts or development, or sight obscuring fencing has been provided. (6) here needed, loading facilities are provided on-site and are of sufficient size and number to adequately handle the delivery or shipping of goods or people. here possible, loading areas should be designed so that vehicles enter and exit the site in a forward motion. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSION: The applicant s written narrative indicates any onsite lighting will be directed downward and onto walls, walkways and pavement below and will be located so that light does not shine onto adjacent properties. Condition of Approval 2 above will ensure compliance with ADC 8.390(1). The proposed restaurant and dental office are consistent with the CC zoning district and are not expected to generate undesirable impacts on adjacent properties. No storage areas or noise generated equipment of note are proposed. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 18

19 Trash areas will be enclosed in accordance with the requirements of ADC Loading facilities are neither required nor proposed. This standard is met. CONDITIONS Condition 13 Condition 14 Foundation Plantings and Trellises Final Landscape Plan and Elevation Drawings. The final landscape and irrigation plans, site plans, and elevation drawings shall identify the proposed architectural trellis features on the west side of the restaurant building and foundation planting along the north and west sides of the building, and these features shall be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Pedestrian Amenities. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, at least one pedestrian amenity for each building shall be installed in accordance with ADC The proposed bench near the dental office entrance and the weather protection over the south entrance and over the east side of the drive-through restaurant will meet this requirement. ADJUSTMENT REVIE CRITERIA (ADC 2.080) Case File AD-05-17: Adjustment to Travel Aisle idth Standard ADC Table 9-2 The proposed development includes a request for Adjustment Review approval to allow a reduced travel lane width between the two buildings. The following review criteria in Section of the Albany Development Code must be met for the applicant s Adjustment Review application to be approved. Criterion (1) FINDINGS OF FACT The adjustment is not requested to avoid a land use review process or increase density; 1.1 The subject site is zoned CC Community Commercial, which has no minimum lot size or density requirements 1.2 The proposed development is permitted in the CC zoning district subject to Site Plan Review approval. The proposed Adjustment Review application was submitted with a Site Plan Review application. No other land use applications would be required if the proposal did not include the Adjustment Review application. CONCLUSIONS 1.1 The proposed adjustment will not avoid a land use process or increase density. 1.2 This criterion is satisfied without conditions. Criterion (2) The need for the adjustment is created by the unusual configuration of the property, to protect natural features, due to the location of an existing structure on the site, or the site is an infill or redevelopment site less than one acre with development on both sides; FINDINGS OF FACT 2.1 The subject site is developed with an existing commercial structure to remain, on an infill site under one acre, with development on all adjoining properties, and is located at the intersection of two arterials with access restrictions. Right-of-way dedication along the west site boundary is proposed and required for Site Plan Review approval will further reduce the size of the site. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 19

20 2.2 The applicant request to adjust the travel aisle width standard in ADC Table 9-2 to allow for a 24 9 travel aisle width rather than a 26-foot travel aisle width for the parking area between the existing building along the east site boundary and the proposed building along the west site boundary. CONCLUSIONS 2,1 The need for the adjustment is created by the small size of the site, its location at the corner of two arterials with access restrictions, and the location of existing development on the site relative to the west property line. 2.2 This criterion is satisfied without conditions. Criterion (3) The adjustment is the minimum necessary to address the unusual circumstance, generally no more than 10 percent from a numeric standard, and the request is still consistent with the purpose of the zoning district and any applicable overlay districts. FINDINGS OF FACT 3.1 The applicant proposes adjustment review approval to allow for a 24 9 travel aisle width for the parking area between the dental office and restaurant buildings. This width meets the 24-foot minimum aisle width requirement for two way traffic and emergency vehicle operations provided in ADC 9.130(4) but is less than the 26-foot wide width required for the proposed design per ADC Table The proposed new building is designed and oriented with a narrow east-west dimension, with minimum front yard setbacks, and compact parking spaces between the two buildings where possible to provide for the maximum travel width in the parking area between the existing and proposed buildings. The proposed adjustment is the minimum necessary to accommodate the two buildings on the site. 3.3 The proposed adjustment is less than a five percent reduction to the 26-foot travel aisle width standard. 3.4 The findings and conclusions for Site Plan Review Criterion 2 above, incorporated here by reference, indicate that the proposed parking areas and travel aisle width are designed to facilitate traffic and pedestrian safety and avoid congestion, consistent with the purpose of the CC zoning district. CONCLUSIONS 3.1 The proposed adjustment is the minimum necessary to address the unusual circumstance and still be consistent with the purpose of the CC zoning district. 3.2 This criterion is satisfied without conditions. OVERALL CONCLUSION As addressed in this report and with the conditions of approval noted the applications for Site Plan Review and Adjustment Review satisfies all of the applicable review criteria and development standards. STAFF DECISION APPROVAL with CONDITIONS of the Site Plan Review application referenced above. The approval is subject to the conditions listed below in this staff report. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 20

21 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Condition 1 General. The proposed development shall occur consistent with the plans and written proposal submitted by the applicant, except as modified by approved revisions and conditions of approval and shall comply with all applicable state, federal, and local laws. Condition 2 Right-of-ay Dedication. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate 12 feet of public right-of-way along the site s west boundary as shown on the approved site plan. Condition 3 Condition 4 Access permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall secure an access permit from ODOT for the site s driveway to Highway 20. Access Requirements. The proposed driveway to Highway 20 shall include: Installation and maintenance of a Right Turn Only sign for exiting movements out of the driveway. Installation and maintenance of a right turn pavement directional arrow out of the driveway. Condition 5 Driveway Approaches. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall remove and replace the site s existing driveway approaches to averly Drive and Highway 20 as shown on the approved site plan. Condition 6 Condition 7 Condition 8 Condition 9 Condition 10 Condition 11 Private Easements. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for Building Division review and approval a draft copy of the blanket private utility, drainage, access, pedestrian, and parking easements benefitting both parcels. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded easements. Emergency Access. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for Fire Department review and approval an Emergency Vehicle Access Easement recorded on the affected parcels. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Emergency Vehicle Access Easement. The easement shall require that the easement area shall be maintained by the owners and for purposes of ingress and egress to provide, without limitation, fire protection, ambulances, and rescue services and other lawful governmental or private emergency services to the premises, owners, occupants, and invitees thereof and said easement shall be made part of any submittal. Storage Length. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the site plans shall be revised to show a 20-foot storage length for entering and existing vehicles along Highway 20, in accordance with ADC 9.130(5), and as shown on Site Plan Sheet C1.0 submitted on October 5, Bicycle Parking. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a total of three bicycle parking spaces shall be installed, with at least two sheltered, in conformance with the requirements at ADC 9.120(13). If occupancy is requested for one building prior to the other, at least two spaces must be provided at that time in conformance with the requirements at ADC 9.120(13). Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting fixtures, including pole mounted lights, shall be of a shielded, full cut-off design. Final Landscape & Irrigation Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the City Planning Division for review and approval. The final plan shall include planting and irrigation details, dimensions, and calculations, and notes as necessary to verify the required landscape standards of ADC 9.140(2), 9.150(4), and the screening and buffering standards of ADC and Table 9-4 are satisfied. The plans shall include notes demonstrating compliance with the Alternative Plan standards at ADC 9.150(4) with respect to the size of the trees at the time of planting (ten feet minimum), the Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 21

22 square footage, and the number of shrubs for each planting area (two shrubs per 100 feet). In lieu of irrigation details, the applicant may provide written documentation from a licensed landscape architect, landscape construction professional, or certified nurseryman verifying the proposed plants do not require irrigation and make note of that on the final landscape and irrigation plan. Condition 12 Condition 13 Condition 14 Completion Guarantee. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all proposed and required site improvements, including the installation of required landscaping and irrigation, shall be completed in accordance with approved plans or guaranteed in accordance with ADC Any changes to approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the Albany Planning Division and be in compliance with ADC landscaping standards. Foundation Plantings and Trellises Final Landscape Plan and Elevation Drawings. The final landscape and irrigation plans, site plans, and elevation drawings shall identify the proposed architectural trellis features on the west side of the restaurant building and foundation planting along the north and west sides of the building, and these features shall be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Pedestrian Amenities. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, at least one pedestrian amenity for each building shall be installed in accordance with ADC The proposed bench near the dental office entrance and the weather protection over the south entrance and over the east side of the drive-through restaurant will meet this requirement. ATTACHMENTS A. Location Map B. Applicant s Submittal B.1 B.6 Site Plan Review Narrative (Original 7/26/17submittal) B.7 B.8 Adjustment Criteria Responses (Original 7/26/17submittal) B.9 B.15 Site Plan Resubmittal Response (Submitted 8/31/17) B.16 B.21 Applicant s Site Plans and Drawings (Submitted 8/31/17, except as noted) B.6 A0.0 General Information/Cover Sheet B.6 A0.01 Zoning Requirements B.6 A0.10 ADA Information B.6 C1.0 Site Plan (Revised/Submitted 10/5/17) B.6 C2.0 Grading/Utility Plan B.6 C3.0 Preliminary Landscape & Irrigation Plan B.6 A1.00 Site Plan B.6 A1.01 Site Plan-Adjustment (Original 7/26/17 submittal) B.6 A3.01 Elevations-Starbucks (note: colored version A3.01a retained in case file) B.6 A3.02 Elevations-Gentle Dental B.6 6/12/17Survey, SS Engineers B.6 B.11 Title Report B.6 B.11 2/20/17 Traffic Impact Analysis by Sandow Engineering (Original 7/26/17 submittal) B.6 B.11 7/14/17 averly Street TIA Response to ODOT Comments (Original 7/26/17 B.6 B.11 Past surveys 1947 and 1960 B.6 B.11 Pilon sign Graphic B.6 B.11 10/5/17 correspondence regarding revised site plan C1.0 C. C.1 December 6, 2016, Preliminary Pre-Application Meeting Comments from ODOT Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 22

23 ACRONYMS ADC Albany Development Code CC Community Commercial FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map LOS Level of Service NGVD 1929 National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929* RC Regional Commercial Zoning District SP Site Plan Review TSP City of Albany s Transportation System Plan *The conversion factor from NGVD 1929 to NAVD 1988 in Albany is feet. Staff Report/SP-15-17/AD-05-17, Page 23

24 Lo cust Pl. Ermine St. 9th Ave. Fulton St. Highway 20 Subject Site Bain St. averly Dr. Location Map: 2708 Santiam Highway SE (SP & AD-05-17) The City of Albany's Infrastructure records, drawings, and other documents have been gathered over many decades, using differing standards for quality control, documentation, and verification. All of the data provided represents current information in a readily available format. hile the data provided is generally believed to be accurate, occasionally it proves to be incorrect; thus its accuracy is not warranted. Prior to making any property purchases or other investments based in full or in part upon the material provided, it is specifically advised that you Feet August 31, 2017 Planning Divsion City of Albany Broadalbin St. S, Albany, Oregon (541)

25 Site Plan Review Criteria and Development Standards for: Proposed Starbucks and Gentle Dental building at 2708 Santiam Highway, Albany, Oregon. Site Plan Review Criteria Responses: 1. Public utilities can accommodate the proposed development. The site is served by existing City water and sewer lines that are adequately sized. 2. The proposed post-construction storm-water quality facilities (private and/or public) can accommodate the proposed development, consistent with Title 12 of Albany Municipal Code. There will be an overall decrease in drainage volume from the new development due to the installation of additional landscape areas (see existing conditions survey). Based on this additional pervious area and the discussion at the pre-application meeting, no storm detention or treatment is required. The new on-site storm drain system will connect to the existing curb inlet at the southeast corner of the Santiam Highway/averly Drive intersection and existing storm drain main in averly, following existing drainage patterns but with decreased flows to this system due to the additional landscape areas that we are proposing. 3. The transportation system can safely and adequately accommodate the proposed development. The subject site is flanked on two sides with public streets: Santiam Hwy SE on the north (two-way heading east/west); averly Drive SE on the west (both-ways north/south). There is an existing transit stop within 450-feet south of the proposed project on the westside of averly and existing transit stop approximately 700-feet east past the proposed project on the northside of Santiam Hwy SE. According to the enclosed traffic study, 80% of the drivers that will patronize the proposed coffee shop are already driving by the property. In other words, such facilities generate relatively little additional traffic. There is adequate existing capacity on both Santiam Hwy SE and averly Drive SE to handle the small amount of additional traffic. 4. Parking areas and entrance-exit points are designed to facilitate traffic and pedestrian safety and avoid congestion. The site currently has two access points, which will be maintained in some fashion. There are two primary entrance-exit points, one off of averly Drive

26 SE and one off of Santiam Hwy SE. The two entrance-exit points are located in such a way as to not impede traffic on public rights-of-way and to allow vehicular movement around the site. Traffic flow through the site is designed to be complementary to the parking and drive aisles of the adjacent building and to facilitate movement through the interior parking. All drive aisles are two-way, except the drive-thru lane. For pedestrians, there is a direct connection from the public sidewalks on Santiam to the proposed businesses with a marked crosswalk between the two buildings for pedestrian safety. 5. The design and operating characteristics of the proposed development are reasonable compatible with surrounding development and land uses and any negative impacts have been sufficiently minimized. The immediate neighborhood surrounding the project is primarily service oriented businesses and retail, and restaurants. Residential neighborhoods to the north, south and east are within walking distance of the proposed establishment. The parking has been internalized between the two proposed buildings and along the south property line. The landscape buffer has been maintained along averly Drive SE and Santiam Hwy SE. On the southside we have introduced a planting strip between the property line and the parking to improve existing conditions and to minimize the negative impacts of parking. 6. Activities and developments within special purpose districts must comply with the regulations described in articles 4 (Airport Approach), 6 (Natural Resources), and 7 (Historic) as applicable. This criterion is not applicable. 7. The site is in compliance with prior land use approvals This criterion is not applicable. 8. Sites that have lost their nonconforming status must be brought into compliance, and may be brought into compliance incrementally in accordance with Section This criterion is not applicable. Site Plan Review Development Standards Responses: 1. The proposed project meets applicable development standards of the appropriate zoning category: Article 4-Commercial and Industrial The zoning for the proposed project is CC-Community Commercial. ithin this zoning a drive-thru restaurant use is the closest category for this proposed development. It requires Site Plan Review approval. Special Condition #25, regarding hours of operation within 300-feet of a residence, does not apply because this site is more than 300 feet away from the nearest residence.

27 2. The proposed project meets applicable development standards for uses and/or sites located in Natural Resource Districts or Historic Districts. This criterion is not applicable because the site is not in a Natural Resource or an Historic District. 3. Design Standards; commercial projects must meet applicable design standards found in Article Relationship to Historic Overlay Districts Not applicable; this project is not in a Historic Overlay District Building Orientation (l)(a)the project site consist of 2 parcels; one being.49 acres (21,344 sf) and the other being.28 acres (12,197 sf), fitting in the category of sites smaller than 3 acres. Starbucks has a drive-thru with its main entrance opening to the common parking field with a secondary entrance on the southside of the building with access to averly Drive SE. Gentle Dental has an entrance that both orientates to the common parking field and Santiam Hwy SE. (2) The main customer entrance for Starbucks is on the east side of the building will feature Starbucks' logo and 14" high illuminated sign letters, with a secondary entrance on the southside of the building with similar signage. A fabric awning is proposed over the south entrance, and a painted steel canopy is proposed over the east entrance. Customer entrance for Gentle Dental is in the northwest corner (existing location), signage will be located on the north and west elevations General Building Design The building elevations provide architectural relief and interest and promote a comfortable pedestrian scale and orientation. (1) The amount of transparency required in a CC district is 25% in a band between 2 feet and 8 feet above the ground. Starbucks, on the north facing facade of the building along Santiam Hwy SE there is 6.2% transparency with architectural modulation. On the west facing facade of the building there is 3.6% transparency, along with elevation plain changes both horizontally and vertically and added architectural trellis features. On the eastside there is 61.2% transparency and on the south side there is 29% transparency, but neither of these elevations face the public sidewalk. Gentle Dental, on the north facing facade of the building along Santiam Hwy SE the 25% requirement is met, having 83%

28 transparency. On the west facing facade of the building facing the common parking area is 17.9% transparency while the and south and east facing facades have none, nor do any of these facades face public sidewalks. (2) The street sides of the proposed buildings all have a combination of architectural elements to provide visual interest, including steel canopies, trellises and glazing. In addition, the parapets of the buildings vary in height. Open areas around the building and between the parking area will be landscaped Street Connectivity and Internal Circulation (1) The proposed project will be utilizing existing driveway access on both Santiam Hwy SE and averly Drive SE. (2) Vehicles may access the project site from either Santiam Hwy SE and averly Drive SE. Both entries and exits maintain the block symmetry of the established street grid and mimic established circulation patterns. (3) The only traffic aisle between the public sidewalk and the building is the site access driveway and the drive-thru lane. This traffic access lane leads to the ADA parking spaces. (4) No drop off facilities are proposed for this project, but an ADA accessible parking space will be provided, as per code and national law. (5) No internal roadways are proposed for this project, only drive aisles Pedestrian Amenities (1) The proposed structures are 2,100 square feet and 3,600 square feet in size and will require one pedestrian amenity each. (2) The proposed project will provide two pedestrian amenities: (b) Benches or outdoor public seating for at least four people (e) eather protection (3) Benches are proposed on the Gentle Dental in two locations and weather protection on Starbucks Pedestrian Connections (1) The proposed commercial project is +/-450-feet from the nearest transit stop. Access to the transit stop from the buildings is easy, safe and convenient. (2) A pedestrian access is proposed to connect the proposed structures directly to Santiam Hwy SE and averly Drive SE. (3) No specific pedestrian access is proposed from the subject site to adjacent properties because it is impractical to do so. (4) This site is not at a major transit stop. No additional amenities or connections are proposed to be provided beyond what has already been called out.

29 8.380 Large Parking Areas This section does not apply as the parking area has less than 75 spaces Compatibility Details (1) The exterior light fixtures proposed for the building and parking areas are designed to only shine downward onto walls, walkways and pavement below. Proposed light standards will be located so that light does not shine on to adjacent properties. The proposed lighting will not produce glare for the adjacent properties and will be building mounted. There will be no new light poles. (2) Once construction is complete on the proposed project, the Starbucks/Gentle Dental will not generate any undesirable noise, glare, odors, dust or vibrations to impact adjacent sites. (3) There are no known undesirable impacts being produced by adjacent sites that need to be mitigated. (4) The (2) trash dumpster areas will be screened in a CMU, gated enclosure. (5) The proposed trash enclosure fully screens all trash and is located away from any residential development. (6) No specific loading facilities are required for this project. Findings of Fact: Criterion 1: Fact: Development of any remainder of property under the same ownership can be accomplished in accordance with the code. All of the property under the ownership or control of the applicant is included in this proposal. The property is tax lots 11S AD / TL 900 & All of the property included will be fully developed as part of a concurrent development application. Conclusion: There will be no remainder property to consider for further development. Criterion 2: Fact: Adjoining land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development in accordance with the code. All adjoining lands have direct and adequate entrance-exit access to public streets and do not rely on our site. The property included in this application is already fully developed with access to adjoining public streets.

30 Conclusion: Adjoining properties development potential will not be adversely affected by the proposed project. Criterion 3: Fact: The proposed street plan affords the best economic, safe, and efficient circulation of traffic possible under the circumstances. The application does not include an amendment to the existing street plan. The proposed project will not affect the existing access or street plan. Conclusion: The proposed project does not include a proposed street plan and therefore this criterion does not apply. Criterion 4: Fact: The location and design allows for development to be conveniently served by various public utilities. Properties contain buildings served by franchise & city utility services via service lines in the Santiam Hwy SE and averly Drive SE right-of-ways. Conclusion: The property has existing utility services that will not be altered by this project. Criterion 5: Activities and developments within special purpose districts must comply with the regulations described in Articles 4 (Airport Approach), 6 (Natural Resources), and 7 (Historic) as applicable.. Fact: The property does not lie within any special purpose districts. Conclusion: This criterion does not apply.

31 Adjustment Criteria Response for: Proposed Starbucks and Gentle Dental building at 2708 Santiam Highway, Albany, Oregon. Regular Adjustment Application Criteria Responses: 1. The adjustment is not requested to avoid a land use review process or increase density; AND 2. The need for the adjustment is created by the unusual configuration of the property, to protect natural features, due to the location of an existing structure on the site, or the site is an infill or redevelopment site less than one acre with development on both sides; AND [Ord. 5832, 4/9/14] 3. The adjustment is the minimum necessary to address the unusual circumstance, generally no more than 10 percent from a numeric standard, and the request is still consistent with the purpose of the zoning district and any applicable overlay districts. Findings of Fact: Criteria 1: Fact: The adjustment is not requested to avoid a land use review process or increase density. The subject property is zoned CC Community Commercial, the proposed uses are permitted in the CC zone. Conclusion: The two uses are allowed in this zone. Criteria 2: Fact: The need for the adjustment is created by the unusual configuration of the property, to protect natural features, or due to the location of an existing or proposed structure on the site. The property is an unusual configuration, there is an existing structure and it is an infill / redevelopment on 2 sites less than an acre with developments on both sides.

32 Conclusion: The request is created by the unusual site configuration, the existing structure, less than an acre redevelopment and developments on both sides. Criteria 3: Fact: The adjustment is the minimum necessary to address the unusual circumstance, generally no more than 10 percent from a numeric standard, and the request is still consistent with the purpose of the zoning district and any applicable overlay districts. The adjustment from the 26 two-way drive lane to , is the minimum adjustment possible to meet all other zoning code requirements, it also meets the 24 two-way drive lanes requirement by the Fire Department. The adjustment is less than 10% of the standard at 4.2%. The request is consistent with the purpose of the zoning district. Conclusion: Adjustment meets criteria and is consistent with zoning district.

33 Shawna Adams City of Albany Community Development 333 Broadalbin S Albany, OR RE: File SP and AD (Starbucks/Gentle Dental) Dear Shawna, Thank you for your comments to our land use application for development at 2708 Santiam Highway. e have reviewed your comment letter dated 8/22/2017 and we have provided an itemized response below. Per this response and attached drawings are goal is to have you deem our land use submittal complete. Corrections/Responses General 1. Shared Access and Parking. The development site includes two individual parcels with the proposed access, circulation, and parking designed for shared use. Is a blanket easement and agreement for shared access and parking proposed? Please clarify the proposal and terms for shared access and parking in the narrative and on the site plans. Conclusion: Developer is recording a Declaration of Easements the provides the following to both parcels: blanket pedestrian and car access easements, blanket shared parking easement and blanket utility easement all for the benefit of both parcels. See sheet 7/A0.01 and A1.00. Application Narrative - Development Standards 2. Please provide findings of fact addressing compliance with the parking, landscaping, buffering and screening and other applicable standards in Article 9 of the Albany Development Code. (ADC). In particular: a. ADC 9.120(15) Bicycle Parking. Clarify how the proposal complies with each of the bicycle parking standards at ADC 9.120(13)(a)-(h) and submit a detail that shows how the standards will be met with respect to location, type of rack, clearance, covers. Note: Required bicycle spaces should be in a visible location as near as possible to main building entrances. The site plans do not show parking spaces near the main entrance to the Starbucks building and it is not clear how compliant spaces could be accommodated elsewhere without other site plan modifications.

34 Fact: (13) Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking space requirements are as follows: (a) For multiple-family dwellings (three or more units) one space per four units. (b) For industrial development one space for every 10 automobile spaces required. (c) For commercial or office development - one space for every 10 automobile spaces required with a minimum of two spaces. (d) Exemptions -- the Director may allow exemptions to or reductions in required bicycle spaces in connection with temporary uses or uses that are not likely to need bicycle parking. Bicycle parking spaces shall meet the following standards: (e) Required spaces should be visible and not hidden, and must be located as near as possible to building entrances used by automobile occupants. (f) Each required bicycle parking space must have a parking rack securely fastened to the ground. Parking racks must support each bicycle at a minimum of two points, including at least one point on the frame, and must allow the frame and at least one wheel to be locked with a U-type lock. (g) Bicycle parking areas must provide at least 3 feet of clearance around all 3 sides of a fully-loaded bicycle rack and have an overhead clearance of at least 7 feet. (h) At least one-half of required bicycle parking spaces must be sheltered. Spaces must be protected from precipitation by a roof overhang or a separate roof at least 7 feet tall. Bicycle parking spaces within roofed buildings and bike lockers are considered sheltered spaces. Conclusion: (a) NA (b) NA (c) This requirement is met, we have provided 4 spaces. See sheet A0.01 and A1.00 for locations and details. (d) NA (e) This requirement is met, bikes racks are located at the front entries of each building. See sheet A1.00. (f) This requirement is met, see sheet 1/A0.01 for bike rack details and spec. (g) This requirement is met, see sheet 1/A0.01 for bike rack clearances. (h) This requirement is met, see sheet 1/A0.01 for bike rack shelter detail and Exhibit A. b. ADC 9.120(15) Pedestrian Access. This standard requires walkways between parking areas, building entrances, and adjacent streets. Please indicate how your proposal complies with the standard, particularly with respect to access to averly. Note: Presubmittal versions of the site plan showed a sidewalk extension from the south side of the Starbucks building to averly to address this requirement. Fact: Pedestrian Access. alkways and accessways shall be provided in all new off-street parking lots and additions to connect sidewalks adjacent to new development to the entrances of new buildings. All new public walkways and handicapped accessible parking spaces must meet the minimum requirements of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code.

35 Conclusion: This requirement is met, ADA accessible ramps and access has been added from Starbucks to averly. See attached site plan with dimensions, A1.00 and C1.0. c. ADC 9.130(3) Stall idth. This standard requires 9.5 foot stall widths adjacent to planter islands. Please address compliance. Note: Parking spaces on site plan do not appear to meet standards. Fact: Stall idth. Long-term parking spaces must be at least 8.5 feet wide. Parking stalls for grocery stores or adjacent to planter islands must be at least 9.5 feet wide. Conclusion: This requirement is met, parking stalls adjacent to planter islands have been adjusted to 9-6. See attached site plan with dimensions and definitions, 5/A-0.01, A1.00 and C 1.0. d. ADC Table 9-2, Parking Lot Design. Table 9-2 requires parking lots to have 5-foot back-up space. Please clarify the rationale for the proposed design and its suitability as an alternative for accommodating exiting vehicles. Fact:

36 Conclusion: Table 9-2 requires 5-0 dead-end back-up space. Due to lot restrictions, we propose an alternative back-up space of 2-0 to the side and 33 (7-0 wider than standard isle width) foot drive isle. This will allow for a compact car to exit the stall with one reverse motion, the same as would occur with the code specified method. See sheet 4/A0.01, A1.00 and C 1.0. e. ADC Landscaping/ ADC Parking Lot Landscaping/ ADC 9.2 IO Buffering. Please provide findings of fact that clarify how each of the standards will be met. ADC 9.140(2) Landscaping Required - Non-Residential. Note: The buffer landscaping required under ADC satisfies this standard. Fact: Landscaping Required Non-Residential. All required front and interior setbacks (exclusive of accessways and other permitted intrusions) must be landscaped or have landscaping guaranteed in accordance with ADC before an occupancy permit will be issued. Minimum landscaping acceptable for every 1,000 square feet of required setbacks in all commercial industrial districts is as follows: (a) One tree at least 6 feet tall for every 30 feet of street frontage. (b) Five 5-gallon or eight 1-gallon shrubs, trees or accent plants. (c) The remaining area treated with suitable living ground cover, lawn, or decorative treatment of bark, rock, or other attractive ground cover. (d) hen the yard adjacent to a street of an industrially zoned property is across a right-of-way from other industrially or commercially zoned property, only 30 percent of such setback area must be landscaped. Conclusion: (a) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. (b) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. (c) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. (d) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. ADC (1) Parking Lot Landscaping. This standard requires planter bays, entryway landscaping, and parking space buffer, or in lieu of these, an "Alternative Plan". Please clarify how the proposal complies. Note: ith both options, it appears that the site plans will need to be modified to provide additional landscaping or relevant information to show compliance (e.g. entryway landscaping, parking area landscaping calculations, etc.). See additional comments below regarding Conceptual Landscape and Irrigation Plan. Fact: Parking Lot Landscaping. The purpose of landscaping in parking lots is to provide shade, reduce storm water runoff, and direct traffic. Incorporation of approved vegetated postconstruction stormwater quality facilities in landscaped areas is encouraged. Parking lots must be landscaped in accordance with the following minimum standards: (1) Planter Bays. Parking areas shall be divided into bays of not more than 12 parking spaces. At both ends of each parking bay there shall be curbed planters at least 5

37 feet wide, excluding the curb. Gaps in the curb may be allowed for connections to approved post-construction stormwater quality facilities. Each planter shall contain one canopy tree at least 10 feet high and decorative ground cover containing at least two shrubs for every 100 square feet of landscape area. Neither planter bays nor their contents may impede access on required public sidewalks or paths, or handicapped-accessible parking spaces. [Ord. 5720, 8/12/09; Ord. 5842, 1/01/15] (2) Entryway Landscaping. Both sides of a parking lot entrance shall be bordered by a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape planter strip meeting the same landscaping provisions as planter bays, except that no sight-obscuring trees or shrubs are permitted. (3) Parking Space Buffers. Parking areas shall be separated from the exterior wall of a structure by pedestrian walkways or loading areas or by a 5-foot strip of landscaping materials. (4) Alternate Plan. An alternate plan may be submitted that provides landscaping of at least five percent of the total parking area exclusive of required landscaped yard areas and that separates parking areas of more than 100 spaces into clusters divided by landscape strips. Each planter area shall contain 1 tree at least 10 feet tall and decorative ground cover containing at least 2 shrubs for every 100 square feet of landscape area. Landscaping may not impede access on required public sidewalks or paths, or handicapped-accessible parking spaces. Conclusion: (1) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. (2) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. (3) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. (4) This requirement is met, see attached sheet C3.0. Site Plans and Related Requirements. 3. Conceptual Landscape and Irrigation Plan, ADC Please include conceptual landscape details that clarify how and where landscaping is proposed to comply with the general landscape, parking lot landscape, and buffer standards. The specific information that is needed for staff to determine compliance with the parking lot landscaping standards at ADC will depend on whether compliance with the general requirements or with the "Alternative Plan" requirement at ADC 9.150(4) is proposed. Note: The information provided for the "front yards" appears to be sufficient to address compliance with the ten-foot buffer standard at ADC 9.140(2) and front yard landscaping requirement at ADC 9.140(2). However, staff recommends providing additional measurements and more detailed area calculations that account for intrusions so that staff could determine whether the standards could be met with fewer trees. Please also consider adding square footage calculations for the individual planter bays and entryway landscape areas if this can be done with minimal effort. Conclusion: This requirement is met, additional calculations provided on sheet C ADC (2) Clear Vision Area. Please identify all street and driveway intersection Clear Vision Area on the landscape plan and site plan in accordance with ADC l 2. l 80(2)(b ). Conclusion: This requirement is met, see sheet C3.0 and key note #5.

38 5. ADC Table l Commercial District Development Standards. Please provide updated lot coverage calculations in conjunction with plan revisions. Conclusion: This requirement is met, Lot Coverage is 78.0%, see sheet C ADC Off-Street Parking Space Requirements. Staff did not find the exhibit referenced on Sheet C 1.0 showing how net floor area has been calculated. Please provide the exhibit or further guidance. Conclusion: This requirement is met, see sheet 6/A0.01 and C ADC General Building Design. The application is complete with respect to this standard. To strengthen the application, please elaborate on how the design of the main wall on the north side of the Starbucks building avoids the appearance of a blank wall and consider adding architectural or landscape features to this end. Conclusion: See sheet A3.01-Elevations, A3.01a-Colored Elevations and C3.0 -Landscaping Plan. The north elevation we have added an architectural canopy, change of materials, landscaping and an in ground up light to accent the elevation during evening hours, similar to the west elevations. I hope this response along with the revised drawings will meet with your approval. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments. Regards, Kirk Callison, AIA, NCARB President TIST Design, Inc.

39 EXHIBIT A EXAMPLE OF BIKE RACK COVER Photo of Starbucks Coffee Bike Rack Cover, at 940 Pacific Boulevard, Albany, OR Photo of Starbucks Coffee Bike Rack Cover, at 940 Pacific Boulevard, Albany, OR 4444 oodland Park Avenue North, Suite 100, Seattle, ashington

40 Atttachment B.16

41 Atttachment B.17

42

43 AA TL 501 TRI-VALLEY FOOD MART ZONE: CC AA TL 502 BASKIN ROBBINS ZONE: CC Engineering Consultants OH ST TS AA TL 600 TACO TIME ZONE: CC OH ST TS GAS OH ST ST GAS ST GAS OH 22 OH ST TT OH ' 2" GAS T T OH C C 26 EB 17 B B PP OH MOLLY GORDON AND LEE HERRON 7784 S 72nd AVENUE TIGARD, OR APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: MADISON DEVELOPMENT GROUP 141 FRONT STREET NORTH ISSAQUAH, A FLOOD PLAIN/FLOODAY: N/A ZONE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ORIGINAL LOT SIZE: 29,594 SF (TOTAL) AREA DEDICATED AS RO: 1,565 SF NET LOT SIZE: 28,029 SF SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS: NONE EXISTING USE: 6,429 SF RETAIL (STEREO STORE) PROPOSED USE: 3,600 SF DENTAL OFFICE (GENTLE DENTAL) 2,100 SF COFFEE /DRIVE-THRU (STARBUCKS) 26.5' 12 OH.74' S 14 B C 16 B 8' TYP +/-21,874 SF % COVERAGE (90% ALLOED) LIGHTING PLAN: LIGHTING TO BE PLACED ON BUILDINGS ONLY (SEE ELEVATIONS) EROSION CONTROL PLAN: THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING AREA ILL BE MITIGATED THROUGH THE USE OF PROPER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, SEDIMENT FENCING, INLET PROTECTION, CONCRETE ASH OUT AREAS, ETC. FORMAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN TO BE PROVIDED ITH THE CONSTRUCTION DRAINGS. CLEAR VISION AREAS: SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CLEAR VISION AREAS AT DRIVEAY APPROACH LOCATIONS (NOT SHON ON THIS SHEET FOR CLARITY) 3 C 18' IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 13' (TYP) C C 1' C C C SIGN OH ' OH AD TL 601 CARL'S JR. ZONE: CC B PARKING REQUIREMENTS: KEYED NOTES: 1 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYPICAL) 10 PROPOSED DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING (REMODEL) 20 PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL ARROS PER OSD#TM501 (TYPICAL) 2 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE (12' RIGHT-OF-AY DEDICATION FOR FUTURE IDENING) 11 PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE BUILDING (NE) 21 PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES (4-TOTAL). SPACES COVERED ADJACENT TO STARBUCKS 3 PORTION OF EXISTING RETAIL STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED FOR DENTAL REMODEL 12 PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING AND MANEUVERING AREA 4 EXISTING CONCRETE COMMERCIAL DRIVEAY APPROACH TO BE REMOVED/REPLACED ITH ADA APPROVED APPROACH GRADES PER OSD#RD735 OPTION G 13 PROPOSED PARKING LOT STRIPING/LEGENDS (TYPICAL) 14 PROPOSED 2.5' PARKING OVERHANG AREA (TYPICAL) EXISTING CONCRETE COMMERCIAL DRIVEAY APPROACH TO BE REMOVED/REPLACED ITH CONCRETE SIDEALK PER OSD#RD720, CURB & GUTTER PER OSD#RD PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU LANE (ALLOABLE VEHICLE STACK SHON) EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEALK, CURB, AND GUTTER TO REMAIN 16 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) EXISTING CURB & GUTTER TO REMAIN 17 8 EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT 18 PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN (DETAILS TO BE DETERMINED) 9 EXISTING SLOPE, SIGN & UTILITY EASEMENT 19 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN AMENITY (PEDESTRIAN BENCH) PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU ORDER MENU PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAINGS FOR DETAILS) 25 EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING/MANEUVERING AREA (TYPICAL) 26 PROPOSED BUILDING OVERHANG (TYPICAL) 27 PROPOSED "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN, 36" X 36" 28 PROPOSED "RIGHT TURN ONLY" R3-5R SIGN, 36" X 30" GROSS SIZE: EXCLUSIONS: NET SIZE: PKG. RATIO: REQUIRED: COFFEE /D/T DENTAL CLINIC 2,100 SF 3,600 SF 456 SF (SEE EXH.) 225 SF (B/R, STOR.) 1,644 SF 3,375SF 1/100 SF 1/250 SF 16.5 SPACES 13.5 SPACES Title: TOTAL REQUIRED: TOTAL PROVIDED: 0 20' PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE 24 PROPOSED USE: - 5' 3 CITY OF ALBANY CITY OF ALBANY CITY OF ALBANY/ODOT N/A - 1 OH ST GAS AD TL 601 ELMER'S/SHOPPING CENTER ZONE: CC UTILITY SERVICES: ATER: SEER: STORM: IRRIGATION: ' 24 GAS N ' (TYP) PP OH 2" GAS rd Description T ST 8" 12" ST 2 ya By 15.5' Date T OH rd No. T ST 2 ya 8.5' (TYP) Revisions: T T OH ST ST C rd ST ' ' OH OH OH OH T T 24 GAS ST 5.5' 17 4 ya ' GAS GAS 6" rd ,600 SF 4 ya 16 GAS ' ST 6.6' 20 SIG T T T T T 4 6" R10' GENTLE DENTAL T 7 PROPERTY ONER: OH GAS 16 23' GAS 6 11S AD / TL 900 & 1000 OH 7.5' 16 T ST ST ST ST 28' 5 TAX MAP/LOT: EG 15.5' 24.9' EB 25.2' 2708 SANTIAM HIGHAY, ALBANY, OREGON 16' C 15.5' PP 4.3' C OH PROJECT ADDRESS: ST AVERLY DRIVE ' 12" ST TT OH ST OH ,100 SF 12' OH E OH E 10.5' 28 E OH E ' 12' OH 16 STARBUCKS GAS 9.5' ' GAS 16 SITE INFORMATION: GAS OH GAS GAS 23 ST 20' BP BP GAS 7 R10' TS GAS 80' RO 21' T GA S R17.5' ST OH SCALE: NTS ST GAS 1 PROJECT LOCATION STARBUCKS/GENTLE DENTAL T OH 2 G GA S 26' OH T GA S M OH GAS 27 GAS T TS ST 31.8' 15 ST GAS C1.0 ST AS 4 OH ST OH GAS 1 8" G T OH TS ST ST GAS T ST / OH 1 ST GAS OH R30' ST GAS 28' 27 OH 5' 8 18" ST GAS OH GAS S GA S T OH 16 PP GAS 10.1' T T OH 5.2' T 18 GA GA S T OHT T ST AC TL 102 US BANK ZONE: CC T 8 ST 5 GAS. 34 GAS GA S GA S OHT T T GP MPP/JTRG JTRG 09/25/17 30% SD OHGAS ' 59 T T GAS AY OHGAS OH ST T T OH 5' 9 ST OH T T PP ST GAS OH GAS GA S O T H OH E TS T TTSS T O T H HIG H ST GAS OH GAS ST T T ST GAS ST FH T OH ST OH STT TTSS TIA M ST OH GAS 6 10" ST OH T ST T OH T S T TS TS TS ST GAS T TS SAN ST GAS TS TS T Project No: Drawn By: Checked By: Issue Date: Drawing Set Title: OH TS T OH T ST GAS TS ST GAS 2" GAS TS TS TS T T OH TS ST T ST GAS OH TS ST GAS GAS T TOH TOH T OTH ST TS OH T 80' RO ST GAS GAS TS T OTH ST GAS TS ST OH TS ST GAS 12" ST TS ST TS GA S 18" OH GAS PRELIMINARY ST OH ST GAS OH 8-5/ 8" 2708 SANTIAM HIGHAY, ALBANY, OREGON GAS 1867 illiams Highway, Suite 201 Grants Pass, Oregon Office: TS OH ST OH ST Atttachment B.19 SCALE: 1" = 20' 30 SPACES 30 SPACES SITE PLAN 40' COMPACT STALLS PROVIDED: 12 STALLS PERCENTAGE OF COMPACT STALLS: 40% SHARED PARKING AND ACCESS EASEMENT/AGREEMENT TO BE DEDICATED BETEEN PARCELS DEMOLITION NOTE: PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEALK ALL EXISTING ON-SITE SITE IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING SECTION TO REMAIN ILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EXISTING FEATURES. Sheet No: C1.0

44 GRADING NOTE: ST OH OH ST TS OH ST (E)SDMH RIM: " IE(N): " IE(S): " IE(E): TS OH THERE ILL BE AN OVERALL DECREASE IN DRAINAGE VOLUME FROM THE NE DEVELOPMENT DUE TO THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREAS (SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY). BASED ON THIS AND THE OUTCOME OF THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING, NO STORM DETENTION OR TREATMENT IS REQUIRED. THE NE ON-SITE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM ILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING CURB INLET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE STREET INTERSECTION AND EXISTING STORM DRAIN MAIN IN AVERLY, FOLLOING EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS (DECREASE IN EXISTING FLOS TO THIS SYSTEM). GAS OH ST ST " GA S ST GAS STARBUCKS/GENTLE DENTAL OH OH TT OH TT OH 12" ST OH GAS 2" GAS T T OH ST OH T N AC GENTLE DENTAL T T ST GAS OH GAS 3,600 SF (E) FF: T T ST SIG OH T ST AVERLY DRIVE 8 SS '' SD 6" SS '' SD 17 C 6" 25 2 ya rd 3 T ST (E)SSMH RIM: " IE(E): " IE(S): T OH T ST 8'' SD T T OH B RIM: " IE: OH T T ST ST GAS GAS ST OH EG 25 GAS GAS T OH T ST ST OH 8 2 ya 18 RIM: " IE: rd C C 4 ya B B PP rd rd 4 ya EB C 2,100 SF FF: EB C 14 GAS PP E OH E B GAS OH 18 RIM: " IE: OH OH TEL (P)SDMH RIM: " IE(N/S): /8" IE(E): / GAS GAS GAS GAS OH BP BP STARBUCKS 5 GAS OH D ST OH 22 ST OH 8'' S ST GAS OH TS S M OH GAS E OH E GA ST GAS OHGAS T T TS OH 12 ST AS B ST OHGAS OH OH TS / 8" G 10 UTL T S 2 OH G GA ST GAS OH 20 ST GAS ST ST ST GA S T OH 8'' SD B ST OH GAS ST T T RIM/AC: " IE: T T OH 18" GAS ST T 30% SD ST GAS T OHT GAS AY OH GAS OHT ST 1 T T IGH OH GAS GA S T T GAS T PP GA S T T ST GA S T PP T OH GAS GA S GA S O T H OH 15 ST PP T OH S OH B C C C C OH 2" GAS C C SIGN Description B EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEALK, CURB, AND GUTTER TO REMAIN 21 EXISTING SURFACE CONTOUR - 0.5' INTERVAL (TYPICAL) 2 EXISTING ATER SERVICE (INSTALL TRAFFIC RATED GRADE/ADJUST GRADE) 12 EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES (TYPICAL) 22 EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO BE RELOCATED BEHIND NE SIDEALK 3 EXISTING SEER MAIN 13 PROPOSED DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING (REMODEL) 23 PROPOSED DRAINAGE SLOPE DIRECTION (TYPICAL) 4 EXISTING SEER SERVICE TO REMAIN AND BE REUSED 14 PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE BUILDING (NE) 24 PROPOSED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 5 EXISTING STORM DRAIN MAIN 15 PROPOSED ATER SERVICE 25 PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP TO PARKING AREA 6 EXISTING/PROPOSED STORM DRAIN POINT OF CONNECTION 16 PROPOSED SEER SERVICE 7 EXISTING GAS SERVICE TO BE REUSED FOR DENTAL OFFICE 17 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM (EXISTING ON-SITE SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY) 8 EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE REUSED FOR DENTAL OFFICE 18 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN/INLET 9 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 19 PROPOSED GAS SERVICE 10 EXISTING CONCRETE COMMERCIAL DRIVEAY APPROACH TO BE REMOVED/REPLACED ITH ADA APPROVED APPROACH GRADES (SIMILAR DRIVEAY LOCATION) 20 PROPOSED POER/PHONE SERVICE EXISTING ATER MAIN Date 1 Revisions: KEYED NOTES: No. By GAS ST OH GAS ST OH B 12 GAS ST 12" ST GAS AC C - ST 8" GAS GP MPP/JTRG JTRG 08/29/17 OH S T MH ST GAS D 8'' S E TS 1 GAS T TIA ST TTSS GAS 11 ST T O T H GAS GA OH ST ST ST OH GAS 9 T ST T ST GAS Project No: Drawn By: Checked By: Issue Date: Drawing Set Title: OH FH STT TTSS 10" ST SAN ST OH OH T ST UTL T OH T S T TS TS TS T TS 5 TS TS T ST OH TS T OH 2" GAS TS TS TS T 6 GAS (E) CB RIM: G AS (E)10"IE: GAS TS T T OH TS ST T ST GAS OH TS ST GAS GAS T TOH TOH T OTH ST TS OH T ST GAS GAS TS T OTH ST GAS TS ST OH TS ST GAS 12" ST TS ST TS GAS 18" OH GAS PRELIMINARY ST OH ST GAS OH 8-5/ illiams Highway, Suite 201 Grants Pass, Oregon Office: ONLY MINOR GRADING ILL TAKE PLACE ON THE SITE AFTER THE EXISTING ASPHALT/BASE ROCK IS REMOVED. NO CHANGE IN GRADE AT ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARIES IS ANTICIPATED, THEREFORE NO TYPICAL SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED. TS GAS Engineering Consultants 2708 SANTIAM HIGHAY, ALBANY, OREGON ST Atttachment B.20 Title: 0 20' 40' GRADING/UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' Sheet No: C2.0

45 Atttachment B.21

46

47

48

49

50

51 Atttachment B.27

52 )LUV$PHULFDQ7LOH&RPSDQ\RI2UHJRQ K$YH6(6H% $OEDQ\25 3KQ )D[ P qr I )& "!&$' & Pp ir!! % )2548(67,2165(*$5',1*<285&/26,1*3/($6(&217$&7 :,//,$0+251%(&.@ p Pssvpr 8y r Qu r)$"!#(%$%ah )@ hvy)xc irpx5sv h p Av 6 r vphuv yr8 ƒh sp rt!!i@#!q6 rˆrq yhqps(&! " )25$//48(67,2165(*$5',1*7+,635(/,0,1$5<5(32573/($6(&217$&7 'DYLG7ULYHUv yrpssvpr Qu r)$# (!%'''@ hvy)q v r 5sv h p 3UHOLPLQDU\7LOH5HSRU &RXQ\7D[5ROO6LXV$GGUHVV!&'Th vh Cvtuh T@6yih PS(&"!! $/7$2ZQHUV6DQGDUG&RYHUDJH /LDELOL\ 3UHPLXP $/7$2ZQHUV([HQGHG&RYHUDJH /LDELOL\ 3UHPLXP $/7$/HQGHUV6DQGDUG&RYHUDJH /LDELOL\ 3UHPLXP $/7$/HQGHUV([HQGHG&RYHUDJH /LDELOL\ 7%' 3UHPLXP 7%' (QGRUVHPHQ 3UHPLXP *RY6HUYLFH&KDUJH &RV 2KHU &RV 3URSRVHG,QVXUHG/HQGHU7%' 3URSRVHG%RUURZHU0DGLVRQ'HYHORSPHQ*URXS//& Xrh rƒ rƒh rq v ˆrUv yrd ˆ hprq yvp Q yvpvr sav 6 r vphuv yrd ˆ hpr8 ƒh h Iri h xh8 ƒ h v v urs hqh ˆ u hi rv ˆ vt v yr urs yy vtqr p virqyhq) Uuryhq rsr rq v uv rƒ v qr p virqv@ uviv 6h hpurqur r hqh spp ir! %h ')h v yr ursrr v ƒyrr h rv r HCr h U ˆ rrˆqr urgrracr Ur h r h U ˆ h h!v r r Grr8 Cr h h #v r r hqh q h h #v r r hyyh rh vp Tˆiwrp urr prƒ v r pyˆ v hq vƒˆyh v uvpuh r qvh vy ƒh s ˆpuQ yvp s hq urs yy vt) 7KLVUHSRULVIRUKHH[FOXVLYHXVHRIKHSDULHVKHUHLQVKRZQDQGLVSUHOLPLQDU\RKHLVVXDQFHRID LOHLQVXUDQFHSROLF\DQGVKDOOEHFRPHYRLGXQOHVVDSROLF\LVLVVXHGDQGKHIXOOSUHPLXPSDLG

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`PAUC@QPGD8`APSHPSAPSHTXDGG7@AVSIDTC@9VQPIS@RV@TU UD #(Sr &!!' )LUV$PHULFDQ7LOH

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`PAUC@QPGD8`APSHPSAPSHTXDGG7@AVSIDTC@9VQPIS@RV@TU UD #(Sr &!!' )LUV$PHULFDQ7LOH

59 3UHOLPLQDU\5HSRU 2UGHU1R 3DJHRI ([KLEL$ 5HDOSURSHU\LQKH&RXQ\RI/LQQ6DHRI2UHJRQGHVFULEHGDVIROORZV 75$&7,%HJLQQLQJDDSRLQRQKH:HVERXQGDU\OLQHRIKH1RUKƒ :HVFKDLQVGLVDQ IURPKH6RXKHDVFRUQHURIKH'/&RI$QGHUVRQ&R[DQGZLIH1R1R&ODLP1RLQ6HFLRQ 7RZQVKLS6RXK5DQJH:HVRIKH:LOODPHH0HULGLDQ/LQQ&RXQ\2UHJRQVDLGSRLQRI EHJLQQLQJDOVREHLQJKHSRLQRILQHUVHFLRQRIKH:HVOLQHRIVDLG&ODLP1RDQGKHFHQHUOLQHRI KH6DQLDP+LJKZD\DVQRZORFDHGIURPVDLGSRLQUXQQLQJKHQFH6RXKHDVHUO\DORQJKHFHQHUOLQH RIVDLG6DQLDP+LJKZD\DGLVDQFHRIIHHKHQFH6RXKƒ (DVSDUDOOHOZLKKH:HVOLQHRIVDLG &ODLPDGLVDQFHRIIHHKHQFH1RUKZHVHUO\SDUDOOHOZLKVDLGFHQHUOLQHRIVDLGKLJKZD\ IHHRKH:HVOLQHRIVDLGFODLPKHQFH1RUKƒ :HVIHHRKHSRLQRIEHJLQQLQJ 75$&7,,%HJLQQLQJDDSRLQRQKHFHQHUOLQHRIKH6DQLDP+LJKZD\IHH6RXKƒ (DV IURPDSRLQRILQHUVHFLRQRIVDLG+LJKZD\ZLKKH:HVOLQHRIDQGFKDLQV1RUKƒ :HVRI KH6RXKZHVFRUQHURIKH$QGHUVRQ&R['/&1RLQ6HFLRQ7RZQVKLS6RXK5DQJH:HVRI KH:LOODPHH0HULGLDQ/LQQ&RXQ\2UHJRQKHQFH6RXKƒ (DVDORQJKHFHQHUOLQHRIVDLG KLJKZD\IHHKHQFH6RXKƒ (DVSDUDOOHORVDLG&ODLPIHHKHQFH1RUKƒ :HV SDUDOOHORFHQHUOLQHRIVDLG+LJKZD\IHHKHQFH1RUKƒ :HVIHHRKHSODFHRI EHJLQQLQJ 75$&7,,,%HJLQQLQJLQKHFHQHURIKH6DQLDP+LJKZD\6RXKƒ (DVIHHDQG1RUKƒ :HVFKDLQVRIKH6RXKZHVFRUQHURIKH'/&RI$QGHUVRQ&R[&ODLP1RLQ6HFLRQ 7RZQVKLS6RXK5DQJH:HVRIKH:LOODPHH0HULGLDQ/LQQ&RXQ\2UHJRQKHQFH6RXKƒ (DVDORQJKHFHQHURIVDLGKLJKZD\IHHKHQFH6RXKƒ (DVSDUDOOHOZLKKH:HVOLQH RIVDLG&ODLPIHHKHQFH1RUKƒ :HVIHHKHQFH1RUKƒ :HVSDUDOOHOZLKKH ZHVOLQHRIVDLG&ODLPIHHRKHSODFHRIEHJLQQLQJ ([FHSLQJKHUHIURPKHSRULRQO\LQJZLKKH+LJKZD\1RDQG:DYHUO\'ULYH 127(7KLVOHJDOGHVFULSLRQZDVFUHDHGSULRUR-DQXDU\ )LUV$PHULFDQ7LOH

60 February 20, 2017 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

61 06 / 30 /18 SANDO ENGINEERING

62

63

64

65

66

67 Salem Ave Highway 99E Albany Municipal Airport 9th Ave Price Rd 14th Ave Clay St averly Dr Project Site Highway 20 Queen Ave Geary St 21st Ave Center St Fescue St Grand Prairie Rd Interstate 5 Three Lakes Rd averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 1: Site Location and Vicinity Map

68

69 averly Dr Highway 20 STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Eugene, Oregon Figure 2: Lane Configuration and Intersection Control

70

71

72 averly Dr Highway 20 STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 3: 2017 Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

73 averly Dr Highway 20 STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 4: 2017 Background AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

74 averly Dr Highway 20 STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 5: 2022 Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

75 averly Dr Highway 20 STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 6: 2022 Background AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes

76

77

78 averly Dr 0/-12/-12 6/17/23 0/-13/-13 0/0/0 Highway 20 0/0/0 0/-5/-5 2/5/7 0/0/0 0/-13/-13 0/0/0 STOP 0/0/0 8/15/23 0/0/0 4/0/4 0/0/0 0/-5/-5 7/15/22 2/0/2 0/0/0 9/24/33 Project Site 0/-9/-9 6/22/28 STOP Primary Trips/Pass-By Trips/Total Trips averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 7: Site Trips - PM Peak Hour

79 averly Dr 0/-29/-29 11/38/49 0/-38/-38 0/0/0 Highway 20 0/0/0 0/-9/-9 3/9/12 0/0/0 0/-38/-38 0/0/0 STOP 0/0/0 10/32/42 0/0/0 8/0/8 0/0/0 0/-9/-9 9/40/49 2/-1/1 0/0/0 11/57/68 Project Site 0/-18/-18 15/58/71 STOP Primary Trips/Pass-By Trips/Total Trips averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 8: Site Trips - AM Peak Hour

80 averly Dr Highway STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 9: 2017 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Trips

81 averly Dr Highway STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 10: 2017 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Trips

82 averly Dr Highway STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 11: 2022 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Trips

83 averly Dr Highway STOP Project Site STOP averly Drive Development, Albany, Oregon Figure 12: 2022 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Site Trips

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92 APPENDIX A: SITE PLAN SANDO ENGINEERING

93 Atttachment B.69

94 APPENDIX B: CRASH DATA SANDO ENGINEERING

95

96 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N 04/14/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SA 0 AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK UNK N N N N N 09/07/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR PED 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04,18 CITY E AVERLY DR SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY PED PRVTE N-SE P 05 0 N DLIT FAT PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y STRGHT 01 PED KILL 52 M I XLK ,18 N S N N N 11/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE TU AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 74 M OR-Y N N N N N 12/05/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD S-STRGHT 01 NONE 1 TURN-R NO RPT E AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N ET SS-O PRVTE S -SE P 06 0 N DUSK PDO SEMI TO 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 001, NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 M OR-Y N N N 01/28/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE SA 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y 016, NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y N N N 02/03/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N A 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PUBLC S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

97 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 2 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 11/12/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN O-1STOP 01 NONE 0 BACK 10 NO RPT MO 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N ET BACK RENTL N -S P 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OTH-Y 011,016, N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 F OR-Y N N N 05/20/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 F OR-Y N N N N N 01/27/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY FR AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 043, OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OR-Y N N N N N 07/23/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE MO AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 70 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 F OR-Y N N N N N 02/18/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 CITY FR AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N ET ANGL PRVTE SE-N P 02 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 74 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 M OR-Y PRVTE S -N NONE 0 STRGHT Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

98 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 3 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 36 F NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 04 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 05 PSNG INJB 15 M PRVTE S -N NONE 0 STRGHT PSNGR CAR 06 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 07 PSNG INJB 15 M N N N 04/21/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 04 NONE TH AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N -SE P 04 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE S -SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 F OR-Y N N N 06/09/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 NO RPT TH AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE SE-N A 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 75 M OR-Y 016, NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 M OR-Y N N N N N 09/25/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY SU AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N-SE A 03 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 26 F OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 86 F OR-Y Y N N N N 12/05/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLD O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02,01 CITY E 30 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE N -E P 05 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M N-VAL 016,004, (03) 02 NONE 0 TURN-L Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

99 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 4 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PRVTE N-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 81 M OR-Y N N N N N 03/28/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY MO 100 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) NONE N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N A 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OTH-Y (02) N-RES 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y N N N 07/19/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NONE TH 150 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 M OR-Y (05) 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 92 F OR-Y 004, NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 00 M N N N N N 02/02/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY E 200 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S P 07 N DARK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 68 F OR-Y (04) PRVTE S NONE 0 TURN-L PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 18 F OR-Y N N N 05/09/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR S-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 08 NO RPT MO 300 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE N -E P 07 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 66 F OR-Y 007, (04) N-RES 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 52 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 24 F N Y N N N 11/08/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N RAIN PED 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 18,19 CITY TH 420 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) NONE N ET PED PRVTE S P 07 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 29 F OR-Y (04) - STRGHT 01 PED INJC 55 M SIDEK ,19 N S Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

100 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 5 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N 06/14/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 CITY TU AVERLY DR N (NONE) STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 64 M OR-Y (04) 01 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 58 F NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 F OR-Y N N N 10/28/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L NO RPT FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE N -SE P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 M OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 69 M OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 06/18/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY Y N CLR S-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 06 NO RPT MO AVERLY DR N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE SE-N P 05 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 52 F OR-Y 032, (05) OR>25 PRVTE SE-S NONE 0 TURN-L PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 F OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 12/31/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 NONE MO AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y (04) OR-? 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 50 F OR-Y N N N 03/10/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y Y CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE TH 20 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 69 F OR-Y (02) OR-? 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F OR-Y N N N 03/06/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27,07 NONE SU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE A 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 M OR-Y 016, ,07 Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

101 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 6 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 82 M OR-Y OR-? N N N 10/30/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NO RPT SU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) SP PED SIG N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 46 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 45 M N N N N N 12/16/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY FR AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 F OR-Y 016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 86 M OR-Y N N N 08/18/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SA AVERLY DR SE (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 34 F N N N N N 11/07/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY E AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 66 M OR-Y OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 42 M N N N N N 03/25/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27,07 CITY FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) NONE N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

102 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 7 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 5P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y 016, ,07 (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 54 F OR-Y OR-? N N N 07/25/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 STATE MO AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 05 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y 043, (04) PRVTE SE-N NONE 0 STOP PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 36 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 26 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 01 M N N N N N 10/20/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY SA AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 54 M N N N 10/31/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE E AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 73 M OR-Y N N N 10/05/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13 NONE FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY SS-O PRVTE N-SE P 05 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y (05) 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 F OR-Y N N N 12/26/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

103 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 8 02/22/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2012 Total crash records: 36 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE NO RPT E AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE -E P 03 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 83 M OR-Y 016, ,27 (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 66 F Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

104 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 02/02/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY MO AVERLY DR N NONE N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F SUSP NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 58 F OR-Y OR>25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y OR> N N N N N 02/10/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 CITY TU AVERLY DR SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 24 M OR-Y N N N N N 06/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 07,10 CITY SA AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-S P 05 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F SUSP 043, ,10 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y N N N N N 07/06/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SU 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y N N N N N 01/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY TH 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 45 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 51 F OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

105 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 2 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 06/14/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE FR AVERLY DR TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 F OR-Y OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 37 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 30 M PRVTE N-SE NONE 0 STOP PSNGR CAR 04 PSNG INJC 30 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 F OR-Y N N N N N 04/04/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR AVERLY DR TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 02 F NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG NO<5 02 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 44 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK UNK N N N 12/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE MO AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE UNK 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OTH-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

106 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 3 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK UNK N N N N N 05/01/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT ,27 CITY FR AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 M OR-Y 016, ,27 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 M OR-Y N N N N N 02/10/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY SU AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE SE-N P 01 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 Unk UNK UNK 03 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 79 M OR-Y N N N N N 05/16/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY TH AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 F OR-Y 043, NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG NO<5 01 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 30 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y N N N N N 07/17/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NO RPT E AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N-SE Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

107 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 4 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 5A 03 0 N DAN PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 F OR-Y 004, N N N N N 07/22/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NO RPT MO AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SE-N A 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N -SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y N N N N N 03/10/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04,27 CITY MO AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE N-SE A 04 0 N DAN PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 016, ,27 02 NONE 1 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 M OR-Y N N N N N 02/14/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 CITY SA AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N-SE P 03 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 71 F OR-Y N N N N N 01/17/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-L CITY SA AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N ET TURN PRVTE N-N P 04 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 76 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 29 M OR-Y N N N N N 12/14/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLD ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY SA AVERLY DR E (NONE) STOP SIGN N DRY ANGL PRVTE N-SE P 03 Y DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 59 M OR-Y (04) 01 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 78 F NONE 0 STRGHT Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

108 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 5 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 M OR-Y 016, N N N N N 02/20/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 02 NONE FR AVERLY DR SE (NONE) NONE N DRY TURN PRVTE N -N P 05 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 028, (04) UNK 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y N Y N N N 04/27/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY MO 440 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 63 M SUSP (05) PRVTE S NONE 0 TURN-L PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 F OR-Y 051,004, ,02 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 00 M NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 47 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 49 F OR-Y N N N N N 04/03/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L NONE E AVERLY DR N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OR-Y (05) 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE MTRCYCLE 01 DRVR INJB 49 F OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 05/01/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE TH 0 AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N A 05 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y (02) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 F OR-Y N N N N N 05/21/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT ,29 CITY TH 50 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y 016, ,29 (03) Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

109 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 6 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PRVTE N -S NONE 0 STOP PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 50 M OR-Y Y N N N N 09/13/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY FR 75 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 08 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 19 F OR-Y 050, (02) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y N N N N N 10/28/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE MO AVERLY DR E (NONE) SP PED SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y (04) 01 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 01 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 M OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 04/06/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SU AVERLY DR E (NONE) SP PED SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y N N N N N 07/07/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY MO AVERLY DR E (RSDMD) SP PED SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 M OR-Y 043,016, (04) PRVTE SE-N NONE 0 STOP PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 15 F N-VAL NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 39 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 65 M OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

110 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 7 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 06/26/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR BIKE 01 NONE 0 STRGHT ,19 CITY FR AVERLY DR E (NONE) SP PED SIG N DRY ANGL PRVTE SE-N P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y (05) - STRGHT 01 BIKE INJC 54 M ROAD 049, ,19 S N N N N N N 11/06/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY E AVERLY DR SE (RSDMD) SP PED SIG N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y 016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M N N N 11/05/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27 CITY E AVERLY DR SE (NONE) BUS STPSGN N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M SUSP 016, (04) 02 NONE STOP PUBLC SE-N OTH BUS 01 DRVR NONE 56 F OR-Y N N N N N 04/28/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE TU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y (04) PRVTE N-SE NONE 0 STOP PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 81 M OR-Y PRVTE N-SE NONE 0 STOP PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 21 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 01 F N N N N N 05/03/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY SU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y 043, (04) 01 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

111 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 8 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 62 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 66 M OR-Y N N N 10/01/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N UNK S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE TH AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N UNK REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 Unk UNK (04) UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 40 F OR-Y N N N 01/20/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE TU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N A 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 47 M OR-Y N N N N N 04/11/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27 NONE SA 40 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 F OR-Y 016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y OR> N N N N N 02/12/ AVERLY DR STRGHT N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY E 80 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 08 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 65 F OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y N N N N N 07/25/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR 100 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 M OR-Y (04) OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK UNK N N N N N 05/05/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

112 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 9 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE NONE MO AVERLY DR (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 M OR-Y 016, (04) OR-? 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y N N N N N 09/04/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE A 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 M OR-Y N N N N N 01/04/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NO RPT SU AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y PRVTE N-SE NONE 0 STOP (04) OR>25 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y OR> N N N N N 02/13/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NONE FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 85 M OR-Y 016,045, N N N N N 05/08/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 69 F OR-Y N N N N N 12/16/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE E AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OR-Y (04) Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

113 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 10 02/14/2017 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 42 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 65 M OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

114 APPENDIX C: TRAFFIC COUNTS SANDO ENGINEERING

115 ,, Turn Count Summary Location: averly St at Santiam Hwy (US 20), Albany, OR GPS Coordinates: Date: Day of week: Tuesday eather: Analyst: Total vehicle trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 15: : : : : : : : : : : : : Car trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 15: : : : : : : : : : : : : Truck trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 15: : : : : : : : : : : : : Bicycle trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 15: : : : : : : : : : : : : Pedestrian volumes Interval starts NE N S SE Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Total 15: : : : : : : : : : : : :

116 Intersection Peak Hour 16:00-17:00 SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Vehicle Total Factor Approach Factor Peak Hour Vehicle Summary Vehicle SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Car Truck Bicycle Peak Hour Pedestrians NE N S SE Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Total Pedestrians

117 Intersection Peak Hour Location: averly St at Santiam Hwy (US 20), Albany, OR GPS Coordinates: Date: Day of week: Tuesday eather: Analyst: SB: averly St EB: Santiam Hwy (US 20) B: Santiam Hwy (US 20) NB: averly St Intersection Peak Hour 16:00-17:00 SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Vehicle Total Factor Approach Factor

118 ,, Turn Count Summary Location: averly St at Santiam Hwy (US 20), Albany, OR GPS Coordinates: Date: Day of week: Tuesday eather: Analyst: Total vehicle trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 06: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Car trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 06: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Truck trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 06: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Bicycle trafc Interval starts SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Thru Right Left Total 06: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Pedestrian volumes Interval starts NE N S SE Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Total 06: : : : : : : : : : : : : :

119 Intersection Peak Hour 08:30-09:30 SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Vehicle Total Factor Approach Factor Peak Hour Vehicle Summary Vehicle SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Car Truck Bicycle Peak Hour Pedestrians NE N S SE Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Total Pedestrians

120 Intersection Peak Hour Location: averly St at Santiam Hwy (US 20), Albany, OR GPS Coordinates: Date: Day of week: Tuesday eather: Analyst: SB: averly St EB: Santiam Hwy (US 20) B: Santiam Hwy (US 20) NB: averly St Intersection Peak Hour 08:30-09:30 SouthBound estbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Vehicle Total Factor Approach Factor

121 APPENDIX D: TRAFFIC VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS SANDO ENGINEERING

122

123

124

125

126

127 Growth Factor 1.08

128

129 * Percent of ADT Values in gray are high and low values not used

130

131

132

133

134

135 Growth Factor 1.08

136

137 * Percent of ADT Values in gray are high and low values not used

138 APPENDIX E: 2017 SYNCHRO OUTPUT SANDO ENGINEERING

139 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 1

140 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 36.9% 16.7% 40.3% 15.0% 35.6% 35.6% 10.8% 31.4% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None alk Time (s) Flash Dont alk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS E F F D F D B F E Approach Delay Approach LOS F F D E Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.43 Intersection Signal Delay: 77.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: averly Dr & Highway 20 Intersection LOS: E ICU Level of Service G Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 2

141 2/15/2017 Movement EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.37 c c c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service E F F D F D C F E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F F D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 78.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 15.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 3

142 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBT EBR BL BT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 5

143 2/15/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBT EBR BL BT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB B NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR BL BT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS C - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 6

144 2/15/2017 Lane Group BL BR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 7

145 2/15/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement BL BR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach B NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ PM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 8

146 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Background Synchro 8 Report Page 1

147 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.8% 36.1% 17.5% 42.8% 15.0% 35.6% 35.6% 10.8% 31.4% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None alk Time (s) Flash Dont alk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D C D B D C A D D Approach Delay Approach LOS C C C D Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 79.2 Natural Cycle: 115 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 27.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: averly Dr & Highway 20 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service B Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Background Synchro 8 Report Page 2

148 2/15/2017 Movement EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 0% Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c c c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service D C C B D C C D C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 82.5 Sum of lost time (s) 15.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Background Synchro 8 Report Page 3

149 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 1

150 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.8% 36.1% 17.5% 42.8% 19.2% 35.6% 35.6% 10.8% 27.3% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None alk Time (s) Flash Dont alk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D C D C D C A D D Approach Delay Approach LOS C C C D Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 85.8 Natural Cycle: 115 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: averly Dr & Highway 20 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service B Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 2

151 2/15/2017 Movement EBL EBT EBR BL BT BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 0% Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/c Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c c c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d Delay (s) Level of Service D C D B D C C D D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 89.2 Sum of lost time (s) 15.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 3

152 2/15/2017 Lane Group EBT EBR BL BT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 5

153 2/15/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR BL BT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach EB B NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR BL BT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 6

154 2/15/2017 Lane Group BL BR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median idth(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk idth(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 7

155 2/15/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement BL BR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Conflicting Flow All Stage Stage Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage Stage Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage Stage Approach B NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Starbucks at averly Dr 12/28/ AM Build Synchro 8 Report Page 8

156 APPENDIX F: 2022 SYNCHRO OUTPUT SANDO ENGINEERING

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174 APPENDIX G: 2017 QUEUING ANALYSIS SANDO ENGINEERING

175 2/16/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

176 2/16/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 19 95th Queue (ft) 47 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 40 Average Queue (ft) 15 95th Queue (ft) 39 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 50 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 41 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

177 2/16/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 36 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 47 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 49 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 48 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 49 Average Queue (ft) 22 95th Queue (ft) 48 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 851 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 741 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 768 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

178 2/16/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

179 2/16/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

180 2/16/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 86 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 55 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 63 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

181 2/16/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

182 2/16/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 37 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 27 Average Queue (ft) 22 95th Queue (ft) 39 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 37 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

183 2/16/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 34 95th Queue (ft) 56 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 Average Queue (ft) 29 95th Queue (ft) 52 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 59 Average Queue (ft) 30 95th Queue (ft) 54 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 121 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 63 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 77 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

184 APPENDIX H: 2022 QUEUING ANALYSIS SANDO ENGINEERING

185 2/16/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

186 2/16/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 36 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 44 Average Queue (ft) 15 95th Queue (ft) 40 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 44 Average Queue (ft) 14 95th Queue (ft) 39 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

187 2/16/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 45 Average Queue (ft) 20 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 54 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 48 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 54 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 49 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 1131 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 982 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 1019 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

188 2/16/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

189 2/16/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

190 2/16/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 121 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 93 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 100 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

191 2/16/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

192 2/16/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 36 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 52 Average Queue (ft) 20 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 52 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

193 2/16/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 50 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 52 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 51 Average Queue (ft) 30 95th Queue (ft) 51 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 56 Average Queue (ft) 31 95th Queue (ft) 51 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 164 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 92 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 110 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

194 APPENDIX I: DRIVE-THRU QUEUING DATA SANDO ENGINEERING

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215 SANDO ENGINEERING 160 Madison Street, Suite A Eugene, Oregon sandowengineering.com

216 SANDOENGINEERING 160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon TO: Keith Blair Oregon Department of Transportation FROM: Kelly Sandow Sandow Engineering DATE: July 14, 2017 RE: averly Drive Development Response to Comments Sandow Engineering would like to provide this response to the comments dated March 1 st, 2017 in regard to the review of the averly Drive Development Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) dated February 20 th, Sandow Engineering s response to the comments and is below: 1. The intersection queue length analysis for all scenario years were not conducted in accordance with Chapter 8 of Version 1 of the APM. The intersection queue length analyses have been developed using some Synchro and SimTraffic default values rather than ODOT specified settings (lane alignment, right-turning speed) and parameters (vehicle lengths, green react times). This oversight could have effects on the results of the queuing analyses as reported queue lengths have likely been underestimated. Therefore, all queuing analyses should be reanalyzed. Prior to reanalysis, all values within the simulation setting window (Section 8.3.3) and the simulation parameters (Section 8.3.5) shall follow the procedures specified in Chapter 8 of Version 1 of the APM. I would be happy to review all simulation parameters prior to the consultant reworking the queuing analyses. The Synchro/SimTraffic models have been updated to reflected the changes requested by ODOT. The updated Synchro and Queuing outputs are attached. The following tables illustrate the updated queuing analysis.

217 Tech Memo From: Kelly Sandow RE: averly Drive Development Date: Page 2 TABLE 1: INTERSECTION QUEUING: YEAR 2017 AM PEAK HOUR 2017 Background 2017 Build Available (Feet) (Feet) Storage 95 th 95 th Intersecon (Feet) Average percenle Average percenle L TLTL EB T TR L TLTL B T averly Hwy 20 TR L NB T R SB L TLTL TR Hwy Site Dvwy NB R Dvwy N/A N/A averly Site Dvwy B R Dvwy N/A N/A EB = Eastbound, B = estbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right As illustrated in Table 1, the added development traffic is not anticipated to create any queuing or spillback issues in the build condition. TABLE 2: INTERSECTION QUEUING: YEAR 2017 PM PEAK HOUR 2017 Background 2017 Build Available (Feet) (Feet) Storage 95 th 95 th Intersecon (Feet) Average percenle Average percenle Hwy Site Dvwy NB R Dvwy N/A N/A averly Site Dvwy B R Dvwy N/A N/A EB = Eastbound, B = estbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right As illustrated in Table 2, the added development traffic is not anticipated to create any queuing or spillback issues in the build condition. SANDO ENGINEERING

218 Tech Memo From: Kelly Sandow RE: averly Drive Development Date: Page 3 TABLE 3: INTERSECTION QUEUING: YEAR 2022 AM PEAK HOUR 2022 Background 2022 Build Available (Feet) (Feet) Storage 95 th 95 th Intersecon (Feet) Average percenle Average percenle L TLTL EB T TR L TLTL B T averly Hwy 20 TR L NB T R SB L TLTL TR Hwy Site Dvwy NB R Dvwy N/A N/A averly Site Dvwy B R Dvwy N/A N/A EB = Eastbound, B = estbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right, TLTL = Two-way left-turn lane As illustrated in Table 3, the added development traffic is not anticipated to create any queuing or spillback issues in the build condition. TABLE 4: INTERSECTION QUEUING: YEAR 2022 PM PEAK HOUR 2017 Background 2017 Build Available (Feet) (Feet) Storage 95 th 95 th Intersecon (Feet) Average percenle Average percenle Hwy Site Dvwy NB R Dvwy N/A N/A averly Site Dvwy B R Dvwy N/A N/A EB = Eastbound, B = estbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right As illustrated in Table 4, the added development traffic is not anticipated to create any queuing or spillback issues in the build condition. The three study intersections have been modeled as isolated intersections within SimTraffic. However, these intersections should be modeled as they actually exist so the model may accurately account for the interdependent effects. The network should be corrected so it is modeled as it has been proposed to actually exist. The three intersections were modeled as isolated intersections due to their close proximity. Specifically, the dedicated left-turn lanes on Highway 20 and averly Drive extend beyond the driveway accesses. Synchro does not allow vehicles in the two-way- left-turn lanes to queue SANDO ENGINEERING

219 Tech Memo From: Kelly Sandow RE: averly Drive Development Date: Page 4 accurately though adjacent (i.e. the site accesses) intersections. This causes left turns to queue in the through lane instead of the two-way left turn lane inaccurately increasing the through queue and decreasing the left-turn queue reported. Therefore, the intersections were modeled separately to get a true queue lengths for the dedicated left-turn lanes at the intersection of Highway 20 and averly Drive. 2. The proposed development will require a new Application for a State Highway Approach from ODOT. The road approach application form can be obtained at At the pre-application review meeting held in Albany on December 7,2016, ODOT staff indicated the approach to the highway will likely be limited to, at most, right-in/right-out turn movements as a future All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) project will install a traffic separator on the US 20 westbound approach to averly Drive. As a result of this forthcoming project and the regular queuing within the existing westbound left-turn lane, it is the recommendation of Region Traffic that, if approved, the proposed approach to US 20 be restricted to, at most, right-in/right-out turn movements. The applicant acknowledges that an Application for a State Highway Approach is required. The application will be submitted after, or concurrent with, city approvals. 3. The proposed development is situated in a location where existing safety on the highway is already of significant concern. Appropriate consideration should be given to minimizing any potential effects to safety at the US averly Drive intersection, the proposed site approach to US 20, and the local segment of US 20. Of specific concern to Region Traffic are: The proposed site approach to US 20 is located within an existing top 10% Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) site. The local highway segment crash rate of 4.34 crashes per million vehicle miles is significantly higher (~150%) than the statewide average for similar facilities of The site plan has room for seven vehicles to queue completely within the drive-thru lane, which would accommodate the average AM peak queue of six vehicles, but not the additional five vehicles within the 95 th percentile queue of 11 vehicles. The additional 150 feet of space the report cites which may be used to accommodate additional queuing is comprised of the parking aisle and driveway throats and not readily available for queuing without hindering site circulation. Further, this entire length is only available if all additional drive-thru vehicles, starting with the eighth queued vehicle enter the site via the averly Drive approach. Once the proposed drive-thru lane capacity of seven vehicles has been reached, any additional drivethru vehicles that enter the site via the US 20 approach are likely to block the approach for all entering vehicles and create the potential for queues extending onto the highway. This concludes the 95 th percentile queue of 11 vehicles would not be accommodated onsite by the currently proposed site plan. This situation could introduce significant safety concerns as the proposed site approach is located within SANDO ENGINEERING

220 Tech Memo From: Kelly Sandow RE: averly Drive Development Date: Page 5 the downstream functional area of the US 20/averly Drive intersection. If it cannot be confidently concluded that onsite design will be able to accommodate queues and maintain adequate on site circulation, thereby minimizing the potential for queuing extending onto the highway, Region Traffic recommends the proposed approach to US 20 be restricted to the right-out turn movement only. The applicant has revised the site plan to include 210 feet of on-site queuing space. On average, the space a vehicle takes up is 19 feet (this is the length of car and space between cars). The revised site layout and drive through is sufficient to queue 11 cars without encroaching onto the sidewalk. The revised site plan is sufficient to hold the 95 th percentile queue for the drive-through. 4. ODOT maintains jurisdiction of the Santiam Highway No. 16 (US 20) and ODOT approval shall be required for all proposed mitigation measures to this facility. No mitigation measures have been proposed. This conclusion appears reasonable for the state facility, but the report has not provided sufficient evidence that queuing entering the site via the US 20 approach will not extend onto the highway. Sandow Engineering acknowledges that ODOT approval is required for all proposed mitigation measures to US 20. Additionally, Sandow Engineering would like to respond to comment from ODOT from the March 3 rd, 2017 meeting. ODOT expressed concern about the methodology used to calculate the intersection crash rate for the intersection of averly Drive and Highway 20. Sandow Engineering has attached a marked-up of copy of the Crash Data outputs which indicates the crashes which were included in the analysis, and reasons for excluding the remaining crashes, to justify the number of crashes used in the crash rate calculation. 06 / 30 /18 SANDO ENGINEERING

221 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

222 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

223 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 147 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 98 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 110 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

224 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

225 3/3/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 26 95th Queue (ft) 57 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 47 Average Queue (ft) 25 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 52 Average Queue (ft) 25 95th Queue (ft) 52 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

226 3/3/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 41 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 53 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 65 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 58 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 57 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 143 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 94 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 107 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

227 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

228 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

229 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 1109 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 946 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 987 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

230 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

231 3/3/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 42 Average Queue (ft) 17 95th Queue (ft) 46 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 36 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 41 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 17 95th Queue (ft) 42 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

232 3/3/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 39 Average Queue (ft) 19 95th Queue (ft) 48 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 Average Queue (ft) 22 95th Queue (ft) 54 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 Average Queue (ft) 22 95th Queue (ft) 52 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 1116 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 928 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 975 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

233 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

234 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

235 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 172 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 119 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 132 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

236 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

237 3/3/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 54 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 49 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 54 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 47 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

238 3/3/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 35 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 Average Queue (ft) 36 95th Queue (ft) 59 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 Average Queue (ft) 35 95th Queue (ft) 57 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 187 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 129 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 143 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

239 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

240 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

241 3/3/2017 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 1212 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 1071 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 1106 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

242 3/3/2017 Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement EB EB EB B B B NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 1

243 3/3/2017 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 17 95th Queue (ft) 42 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 42 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 42 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) 106 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 2

244 3/3/2017 Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 35 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 48 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Movement B Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 22 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 1246 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 1149 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 1173 Starbucks at averly Dr SimTraffic Report Page 3

245 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 02/02/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY MO AVERLY DR N NONE N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F SUSP NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 58 F OR-Y OR>25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y OR> N N N 04/14/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SA 0 AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK UNK N N N N N 09/07/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR PED 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04,18 CITY E AVERLY DR SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY PED PRVTE N-SE P 05 0 N DLIT FAT PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y STRGHT 01 PED KILL 52 M I XLK ,18 N S N N N N N 02/10/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 CITY TU AVERLY DR SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 24 M OR-Y N N N 11/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE TU AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 74 M OR-Y N N N N N 12/05/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD S-STRGHT 01 NONE 1 TURN-R NO RPT E AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N ET SS-O PRVTE S -SE P 06 0 N DUSK PDO SEMI TO 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 001, NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 M OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

246 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 2 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 06/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 07,10 CITY SA AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-S P 05 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F SUSP 043, ,10 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y N N N 01/28/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE SA 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y 016, NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y N N N 02/03/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N A 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PUBLC S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y N N N N N 11/12/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN O-1STOP 01 NONE 0 BACK 10 NO RPT MO 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N ET BACK RENTL N -S P 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OTH-Y 011,016, N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 F OR-Y N N N N N 07/06/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SU 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y N N N N N 01/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY TH 0 AVERLY DR S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

247 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 3 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 2P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 45 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 51 F OR-Y N N N N N 06/14/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE FR AVERLY DR TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 F OR-Y OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 37 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 30 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 04 PSNG INJC 30 F NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 F OR-Y N N N N N 04/04/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR AVERLY DR TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 02 F NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG NO<5 02 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 44 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

248 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 4 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK UNK N N N 05/20/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 F OR-Y N N N N N 01/27/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY FR AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 043, OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OR-Y N N N N N 07/23/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE MO AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 70 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 F OR-Y N N N 12/08/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE MO AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE UNK 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OTH-Y N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK UNK N N N N N 05/01/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT ,27 CITY FR AVERLY DR N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 M OR-Y 016, ,27 02 NONE 0 STOP Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

249 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 5 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 M OR-Y N N N N N 02/18/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 CITY FR AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N ET ANGL PRVTE SE-N P 02 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 74 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 M OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 36 F NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 04 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 05 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 06 PSNG INJB 15 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 07 PSNG INJB 15 M N N N 04/21/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 04 NONE TH AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N -SE P 04 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE S -SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 F OR-Y N N N 06/09/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 NO RPT TH AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE SE-N A 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 75 M OR-Y 016, NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 M OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

250 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 6 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 09/25/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY SU AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N-SE A 03 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 26 F OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 86 F OR-Y N N N N N 02/10/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY SU AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE SE-N P 01 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 F OR-Y NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 Unk UNK UNK 03 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 79 M OR-Y N N N N N 05/16/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY TH AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 F OR-Y 043, NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG NO<5 01 M NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 30 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y N N N N N 07/17/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NO RPT E AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N-SE A 03 0 N DAN PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 F OR-Y 004, Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

251 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 7 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE N N N N N 07/22/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NO RPT MO AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SE-N A 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N -SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y N N N N N 03/10/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLD ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04,27 CITY MO AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE N-SE A 04 0 N DAN PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 016, ,27 02 NONE 1 STRGHT PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 M OR-Y N N N N N 02/14/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 CITY SA AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N-SE P 03 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 71 F OR-Y N N N N N 01/17/ SANTIAM HY INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-L CITY SA AVERLY DR CN TRF SIGNAL N ET TURN PRVTE N-N P 04 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 76 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 M OR-Y NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 29 M OR-Y Y N N N N 12/05/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLD O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02,01 CITY E 30 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE N -E P 05 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M N-VAL 016,004, (03) 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 81 M OR-Y Driveway North of Intersection N N N N N 12/14/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLD ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY SA AVERLY DR E (NONE) STOP SIGN N DRY ANGL PRVTE N-SE P 03 Y DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 59 M OR-Y (04) 01 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE Possibly Site Driveway, not Intersection Related Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

252 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 8 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 78 F NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 M OR-Y 016, N N N N N 02/20/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 02 NONE FR AVERLY DR SE (NONE) NONE N DRY TURN PRVTE N -N P 05 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 028, (04) UNK 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y Driveway East of Intersection located on North Side of Hwy N N N N N 03/28/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY MO 100 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) NONE N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N A 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OTH-Y (02) N-RES 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y Driveway South of Intersection and South of our Driveway N N N 07/19/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NONE TH 150 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 M OR-Y (05) 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 92 F OR-Y 004, NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 00 M Driveway South of Intersection and South of our Driveway N N N N N 02/02/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY E 200 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S P 07 N DARK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 68 F OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 18 F OR-Y Driveway South of Intersection and South of our Driveway N N N 05/09/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR S-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 08 NO RPT MO 300 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE N -E P 07 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 66 F OR-Y 007, (04) N-RES 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 52 F OR-Y Driveway South of Intersection and South of our Driveway 02 NONE 0 STRGHT Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

253 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 9 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 24 F N Y N N N 11/08/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N RAIN PED 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 18,19 CITY TH 420 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) NONE N ET PED PRVTE S P 07 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 29 F OR-Y (04) Driveway South of Intersection and South of our Driveway - STRGHT 01 PED INJC 55 M SIDEK ,19 N S N Y N N N 04/27/ AVERLY DR ALLEY N N CLR O-1 L-TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 CITY MO 440 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 63 M SUSP (05) 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 F OR-Y 051,004, ,02 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 00 M Driveway South of Intersection and South of our Driveway 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 47 M NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 49 F OR-Y N N N 06/14/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 CITY TU AVERLY DR N (NONE) STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 64 M OR-Y (04) 01 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 58 F Driveway est of Intersection 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 F OR-Y N N N 10/28/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L NO RPT FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE N -SE P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 M OR-Y Driveway est of Intersection Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

254 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 10 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 03 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 69 M OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 06/18/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY Y N CLR S-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 06 NO RPT MO AVERLY DR N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE SE-N P 05 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 52 F OR-Y 032, (05) OR>25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE-S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 F OTH-Y N-RES Driveway est of Intersection N N N N N 12/31/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 NONE MO AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y (04) OR-? 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 50 F OR-Y Driveway est of Intersection N N N N N 04/03/ SANTIAM HY ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L NONE E AVERLY DR N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OR-Y (05) 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE MTRCYCLE 01 DRVR INJB 49 F OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 05/01/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE TH 0 AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N A 05 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y (02) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 F OR-Y N N N 03/10/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y Y CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE TH 20 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 69 F OR-Y (02) OR-? 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F OR-Y N N N N N 05/21/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT ,29 CITY TH 50 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y 016, ,29 (03) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 50 M OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

255 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 11 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE Y N N N N 09/13/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY FR 75 SANTIAM HY N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S P 08 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 19 F OR-Y 050, (02) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y N N N N N 10/28/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE MO AVERLY DR E (NONE) SP PED SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y (04) 01 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 01 F Crash Occurred at Ped Signal 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 M OTH-Y N-RES N N N N N 04/06/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SU AVERLY DR E (NONE) SP PED SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y Crash Occurred at Ped Signal N N N N N 07/07/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY MO AVERLY DR E (RSDMD) SP PED SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 M OR-Y 043,016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 15 F N-VAL NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 39 F Crash Occurred at Ped Signal 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 65 M OR-Y N N N N N 06/26/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR BIKE 01 NONE 0 STRGHT ,19 CITY FR AVERLY DR E (NONE) SP PED SIG N DRY ANGL PRVTE SE-N Crash Occurred at Ped Signal Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

256 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 12 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 12P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y (05) - STRGHT 01 BIKE INJC 54 M ROAD 049, ,19 S N N N N 03/06/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27,07 NONE SU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE A 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 M OR-Y 016, ,07 (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 82 M OR-Y Not Intersection Related OR-? N N N 10/30/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NO RPT SU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) SP PED SIG N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 46 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 45 M Crash Occurred at Ped Signal N N N N N 12/16/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY FR AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 F OR-Y 016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 86 M OR-Y Not Intersection Related N N N 08/18/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE SA AVERLY DR SE (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 34 F N N N N N 11/07/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY E AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP Not Intersection Related, Occurred at a Driveway Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

257 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 13 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 66 M OR-Y OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 42 M N N N N N 11/06/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY E AVERLY DR SE (RSDMD) SP PED SIG N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y 016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M Crash Occurred at Ped Signal N N N 11/05/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27 CITY E AVERLY DR SE (NONE) BUS STPSGN N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M SUSP 016, (04) 02 NONE STOP PUBLC SE-N OTH BUS 01 DRVR NONE 56 F OR-Y Crash Occurred at Bus Stop N N N N N 04/28/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NONE TU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 81 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 21 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 01 F Not Intersection Related N N N N N 05/03/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY SU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y 043, (04) 01 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 62 F Not Intersection Related Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

258 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 14 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 66 M OR-Y N N N 10/01/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N UNK S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE TH AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N UNK REAR PRVTE SE-N P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 Unk UNK (04) UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 40 F OR-Y N N N 01/20/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE TU AVERLY DR SE (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N A 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 47 M OR-Y Not Intersection Related N N N N N 04/11/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27 NONE SA 40 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE S -N P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 F OR-Y 016, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y OR> N N N N N 02/12/ AVERLY DR STRGHT N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY E 80 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 08 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 65 F OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 F OR-Y Not Intersection Related 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y N N N N N 07/25/ AVERLY DR STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE FR 100 SANTIAM HY S (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N P 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 M OR-Y (04) OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S -N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK UNK N N N N N 05/05/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE MO AVERLY DR (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 M OR-Y 016, Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

259 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 15 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE (04) OR-? 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y N N N N N 03/25/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27,07 CITY FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) NONE N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y 016, ,07 (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 54 F OR-Y Not Intersection Related OR-? N N N 07/25/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 STATE MO AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-N P 05 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 36 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 26 F Not Intersection Related 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE-N PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 01 M N N N N N 10/20/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY SA AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F OR-Y 043, (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 54 M N N N 10/31/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE E AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 73 M OR-Y N N N 10/05/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13 NONE FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY SS-O PRVTE N-SE Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

260 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 16 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 6P 05 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y (05) 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 F OR-Y N N N 12/26/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT E AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE -E P 03 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 83 M OR-Y 016, ,27 (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 M OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE -E PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 66 F Not Intersection Related, Occurred at Driveway N N N N N 09/04/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT CITY FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE A 03 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 M OR-Y Not Intersection Related N N N N N 01/04/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT NO RPT SU AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y (04) OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y OR> N N N N N 02/13/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NONE FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) UNKNON N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 04 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 85 M OR-Y 016,045, Not Intersection Related N N N N N 05/08/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

261 CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 17 03/03/2017 CITY OF ALBANY, LINN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING AVERLY DR and SANTIAM HY, City of Albany, Linn County, 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2015 Total crash records: 78 S D P R S INT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD THR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL ONER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE NONE FR AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 69 F OR-Y N N N N N 12/16/ SANTIAM HY STRGHT Y N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 29 NONE E AVERLY DR N (NONE) TRF SIGNAL N ET REAR PRVTE N-SE P 03 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OR-Y (04) 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N-SE PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 65 M OR-Y Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.

262

263

264

265 4" 10'-6" 10'-0" 2'-6" 2'-0" Overview Cabinet/Cap Manufacture and install one new D/F pylon sign Aluminum construction. LED illumination. Paint one color Lexan faces with custom 2" aluminum retainers/divider bar. Translucent vinyl graphics TBD. Interior supports for 8" steel pipe frame Supports 14" / 8" steel square tube supports Material Colors Pole Cover 42 Mp01435 Monaco Tan - Satin finish 3Pole Cover Cap 39 Mp02795 Spice Trader - Satin finish 14'-8" 15'-0" DRIVE THRU 8" steel support 14" steel support SIGN A. D/F PYLON SIGN QTY: 1 SQ. FT: 150 (204' lineal street frontage X.75 = 153 sq. ft. allowed) Scale: 1/4" = 1' Digital 3D rendering - graphics to be veri ed CLIENT: Starbucks Gentle Dental SITE: 2798 Santiam Hwy SE Albany OR D#: PG# 1 of 2 DATE: DESIGN: M Lee SALES: arren issmer warren@berrysignsystems.com Berry Sign Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved 7400 Hardeson Rd, Everett, A (425) Fax:(425) Unauthorized use, reproduction and or display shall render the infringer liable for up to $150,000 in Statutory Damages, plus attorney fees and costs. APPROVED AS IS CLIENT APPROVAL: LANDLORD APPROVAL: APPROVED / CHANGES AS MARKED DATE :