Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis JULY Prepared by: U R S Team

Transcription

1 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis Volume 3: Capital Cost Estimates Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Travel Time and Distance Calculations Ridership Summaries and Station to Station Ridership Forecasts JULY 2011 Prepared for: Tri a n g l e Tr a n s i t Prepared by: U R S Team

2 DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS VOLUME 3 INDEX Section A Capital Cost Estimates Section B Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Light Rail Transit (LRT) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Section C Travel Time and Distance Calculations Section D Ridership Summaries and Station to Station Ridership Forecasts Prepared for TRIANGLE TRANSIT Prepared by URS TEAM JULY 2011

3 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis Capital Cost Estimates

4 Capital Cost Estimates VOLUME 3 SECTION A CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Prepared for TRIANGLE TRANSIT Prepared by URS TEAM July 2011 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-i

5 Capital Cost Estimates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction Methodology LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT COST CATEGORIES BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT COST CATEGORIES Capital Costs Light Rail GUIDEWAY AND TRACK ELEMENTS: COST CATEGORY STATION STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL: COST CATEGORY SUPPORT FACILITIES, YARDS, SHOPS, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS: COST CATEGORY SITEWORK AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: COST CATEGORY SYSTEMS: COST CATEGORY RIGHT OF WAY, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: COST CATEGORY VEHICLES: COST CATEGORY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: COST CATEGORY UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCIES: COST CATEGORY Capital Costs Bus Rapid Transit and Transportation System Management GUIDEWAY ELEMENTS: COST CATEGORY STATION STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL: COST CATEGORY SUPPORT FACILITIES, YARDS, SHOPS, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS: COST CATEGORY SITEWORK AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: COST CATEGORY SYSTEMS: COST CATEGORY RIGHT OF WAY, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: COST CATEGORY VEHICLES: COST CATEGORY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: COST CATEGORY UNALLOCATED CONTINGENCIES: COST CATEGORY Results... 8 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3.1 UNIT COST SUMMARY FOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT... 2 TABLE 3.2 STATION AND PARK AND RIDE ACREAGE REQUIREMENTS... 5 TABLE 4.1 UNIT COST SUMMARY FOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND TSM ALTERNATIVES... 7 TABLE 5.1 SUMMARY OF CAPITAL COSTS... 8 TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY COST OF ALL ALTERNATIVES TABLE DETAIL SUMMARY COST OF ALTERNATIVES A1, C1, D3 AND A3, C1, D TABLE DETAIL SUMMARY COST OF ALTERNATIVES A1, C2, D3 AND A3, C2, D TABLE DETAIL SUMMARY COST OF ALTERNATIVES A1, C1, D1 AND A3, C1, D1 12 TABLE DETAIL SUMMARY COST OF ALTERNATIVES A1, C2, D1 AND A3, C2, D TABLE DETAIL SUMMARY COST OF ALTERNATIVES FOR BRT HIGH AND BRT LOW TABLE COLUMN SUMMARY AND QUANTITY DETAIL FOR TSM ALTERNATIVE. 15 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A1, C1, D3 STATION TO STATION..16 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A3, C1, D3 STATION TO STATION.. 20 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A1, C2, D3 STATION TO STATION.. 24 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A3, C2, D3 STATION TO STATION.. 28 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A1, C1, D1 STATION TO STATION..32 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A3, C1, D1 STATION TO STATION TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A1, C2, D1 STATION TO STATION.. 40 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE A3, C2, D1 STATION TO STATION..44 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE FOR BRT HIGH ALT STATION TO STATION..48 TABLE DETAIL QUANTITIES AND COST OF ALTERNATIVE FOR BRT LOW ALT STATION TO STATION..52 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-ii

6 Capital Cost Estimates 1. Introduction This report documents the capital costs for the Light Rail Transit (LRT), Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives for the Durham Orange Corridor as part of the Triangle Transit Alternative Analysis study. A separate Cost Estimating Methodology Report was prepared, which summarizes the methodology and this report presents more detail on unit costs and their development. As outlined in the methodology report, the capital costs have been developed in accordance with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Standard Cost Categories, Rev. 13, June 1, 2010 version. 2. Methodology 2.1. Light Rail Transit Cost Categories Unit costs were developed for various types of guideways based on the plan and profiles and cross sections in the conceptual engineering drawings together with the knowledge of the terrain. At grade construction was broken into several categories depending on amount of fill and excavation and whether the alignment was in open territory, adjacent to a road, or in a street median. Specifically, the categories included the following: Guideway: At grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At grade in pavement, single track, curb running Guideway: At grade in pavement, double track, center running Track and Guideway: At grade semi exclusive Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Track and Guideway: At grade, built up fill medium height 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway: At grade, built up fill large height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill medium height, < 15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill large height, 15 to 30 feet The unit cost for stations is presented in the following categories of cost with a unique category for pedestrian overpasses assigned to code since this is a type of shelter: At grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian overpasses to station Automobile structured parking Automobile parking, parking lot 2.2. Bus Rapid Transit and Transportation System Management Cost Categories A similar approach was used for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives Guideway: At grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At grade in pavement, center running Guideway: Retained cut or fill large height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure add 10% if extra high Guideway: At grade semi exclusive Guideway: At grade, built up fill medium height 10 to 20 feet Guideway: At grade, built up fill large height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill medium height < 15 feet All other costs are similar to the LRT alternatives and the FTA Standard Cost Categories. 3. Capital Costs Light Rail 3.1. Guideway and Track Elements: Cost Category 10 Unit costs were developed based on historical data from bids received, from use of RS Means and from select searches on the internet. These are presented in Table A 3.1 on the following page. The guideway unit costs contain provisions for the trackbed structure (rail, concrete ties, ballast and sub ballast), grading and drainage, erosion control, and special trackwork. In addition, the costs were increased to account for mobilization, contractor s home and field overhead and profit, and contractor s insurance. The costs used are as follows: Ballasted Trackbed, double track 550/ft. Drainage 100/ft. Grading and Erosion Control 300/ft. Special Trackwork Allowance 100/ft. Total 1050/ft. In determining these units, the drawings from the prior regional rail project played a valuable resource. These engineering plans were 90% to 100% complete. They contained erosion control plans, specific drainage patterns and facilities and detailed grading and erosion control plans. The work in the rail corridor is extensive with a significant amount of cut and fill, when compared to the existing conditions. The new LRT rail profile was set approximately to the same elevation as the existing track. The above unit cost is representative for cut/fill sections up to 5 feet in height. For cut and fill heights from 5 to 20 feet, the total unit cost was increased by 525/ft. to 1575/ft. Another 525/ft. was added to that for cut/fill sections from 20 to 40 feet high Vertical circulation to/from cross streets structure and elevators All other cost codes followed the FTA SCC categories. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-1

7 Capital Cost Estimates Unit Cost Table by Construction Type Table 3.1 Unit Cost Summary for Light Rail Transit M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E UNIT COST SUMMARY OF ALL DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY LRT ALTERNATIVES Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Transit Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Cost / foot A. cost/mi B. RR Ops/Force Acct. or Traffic control A + B Guideway Unit Cost/mi. C. Demo, Clear and Grub Cost Per Mile in Millions Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, RR ROW, 275x , Track and Guideway,At-grade RR, built up fill - Med. Hght. <20 feet 1, Track and Guideway,At-grade RR, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet 2, Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Medium Height, <15 feet 2, Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet 3, Track and Guideway: Aerial structure, RR Guideway: At-grade in pavement, single track, 750 track G/D 1, Guideway: At-grade in pavement, double track, 1000 track G/D 1, Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway 1, Freight Track Relocation, 300 track grading/drain/erosion/demo Freight Track Relocation, double track, 600 track grad/drain/eros 1, D. Utiliites E. Systems F. Mobil. Indirects 10% A-E G. Allocated Allocated Cont, % H. 28.5% of const. with alloc. Cont. A-G Total A-H % % cost / mi. Cost / foot Traction Power Supply and Distribution /ft. in 2006, also 219 in 2009 Portland/Boise, use 300/ft. Grading 100 Traction power substations M each in 2009 Drainage and erosion 300 Train Control & Signals 1.00 Based on 200/ft control Communications 0.25 could vary with degree of sophistication, wireless backbone and radio based. Special trackwork 100 Command and Control 0.50 Turnouts, 2 per mile 4.25 Cost/mi. Double track Double Track Aerial or in-pavement, 20% more Cost/mi Single track, in pavement, 75% of double track Train Control & Signals Traction power substations Traction Power Supply and Distribution Communications Fare Collection Use 0.10 per station Command and Control Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-2

8 Capital Cost Estimates From RS Means, standard retaining walls for an average height of 10 ft. were just above 500/ft. For this estimate 600/ft. was added to the 1575/ft. to yield 2175/ft. This represents an average retaining wall height from 5 to 15 feet in height with cut/fill up to 20 feet. There is always horizontal distance for some slope to reduce the height of the retaining wall in relation to the total fill height and top of rail. From RS Means, standard retaining walls for an average height of 20 ft. were just above 1000/ft. For this estimate 1200/ft. was added to the 2100/ft. to yield 3300/ft. This represents an average retaining wall height from 15 to 25 feet in height with cut/fill up to 40 feet. There is always horizontal distance for some slope to reduce the height of the retaining wall in relation to the total fill height and top of rail. An allocated contingency factor of was typically used for guideway costs and 20% for systems costs and 10% for vehicles. The contingency for in street track pavement was increased to 45% to reflect the uncertainty of the extent of the work outside of the basic track slab area for in street track pavement. For the aerial guideway, a base unit cost of 50M/mi. was used based on recent estimates and bids for aerial structures from the Miami Airport Link project. For paved track sections we have used the following unit costs: In street pavement track, double track Drainage Grading and erosion control Special trackwork allowance Total 1000/ft. 100/ft. 300/ft. 100/ft. 1500/ft. The cost estimate assumes that the in street section does not require the re construction of the curbs and sidewalks. The high unit cost does include re pavement of the street to the degree necessary for proper cross sections and slopes. Current costs out of Portland places this figure around 500/ft. but that figure is raised to 750/ft. to be inclusive of contractor s overhead, profit, insurance and mobilization add ons. For guideway construction parallel to the roadway, a 20% mark up to the ballasted double track cost of 1050/ft. to arrive at the figure of 1260/ft. This accounts for the added work at the grade crossing and that production tends to decrease due to the neighboring traffic (safety issues) inherent for track construction that is parallel to a roadway (such as NC 54 or Fordham Blvd.). As shown in column B, 2.0M/mi. was added to the guideway costs for all alternatives to account for railroad force account work and for traffic control. Working alongside an operating railroad will entail full time flaggers and communications with rail operations. This will also provide budget for railroad coordination and reviews based on agreements reached between NCRR, Norfolk Southern and Triangle Transit. For downtown sections, there will be more traffic control required but there will not be a need for railroad force account work. This is assumed to balance out. Relocation of freight track was priced at 1100/ft. for double track which is comprised of 600/ft. for sub ballast, ballast, rail and ties plus 500 for grading/drainage/erosion control/special trackwork (as was used for light rail) relocation of single freight track was priced at 600/ft. ( respectively) Station Stops, Terminals, Intermodal: Cost Category 20 The cost for the station platform includes the platform, canopy and station furniture, lighting, and static signs. Costs for variable message signs, CCTV and public address are included in the systems costs for communications and central control. Station costs do not include the track and guideway which are part of the track and guideway costs. Pedestrian bridges were estimated based on length anticipated and the costs ranged from 2.5M to 4.0M. Vertical circulation structures and pedestrian bridges were divided into two separate categories for ease of identification. Unit costs ranged from 0.25M to 4.0M depending on length and complexity. Additional allowances were also made for at grade pedestrian connections as depicted in Volume 1, Appendix A, Station Evaluation. At grade station, center platform 2.0M Aerial station, center platform 12.5M Parking stall, at grade each 5,000 Structured parking stalls, each 20, Support Facilities, Yards, Shops, Administrative Buildings: Cost Category 30 The Maintenance Facility was also a lump sum guesstimate, since, at this level of planning effort, many policy decisions regarding the sophistication of the facility and what will be performed in house versus contracted out have not been made. The maintenance building and equipment was assumed to cost 15M for a 2 repair bay, 37,000 sf. facility inclusive of maintenance equipment. It assumed a wheel truing machine would not be purchased initially and some limited heavy repair would be initially outsourced or by making use of the proposed commuter rail project s wheel truing machine along with other limited heavy repair functions. An additional allowance was made for an administration/maintenance of way building at 1M and for maintenance of way equipment at another 1M. The yard was estimated based on an average take off of the length of single track from the various yard alternatives presented in the conceptual plans in Volume 2. The guideway unit cost for ballasted double track was used for this single track length take off. This added unit cost figure provides sufficient allowance (5M) for a vehicle wash, parking and paving, more extensive site drainage, stocking of spare parts, security fencing, and miscellaneous canopies and facilities. The higher unit cost was also used for demolition and clearing and grubbing to account for the entire yard beyond the trackway itself (added 2M). The full double track figures for all of the system engineering elements were also used to account for yard lighting, CCTV coverage and a yard substation (added 3M). This also provides monies for central control and office equipment and furniture Sitework and Special Conditions: Cost Category 40 Demolition, clearing and grubbing (Table 3.1, column C) and utility relocations (column D) are in addition to the total guideway unit cost figure in column A+B. Higher costs for utility relocation were assumed for in street pavement but conversely, lower costs are assumed for demolition, clearing and grubbing since this work is limited to the existing pavement sections. The price used reflects the anticipated degree of difficulty and are based on cost estimates and actual figures from the Charlotte Light Rail and Street Car contracts. The costs were also compared to figures used on other projects as well. Various allowances for poor materials and mitigation impacts have been distributed throughout the estimate. These allowances were in the range of 250,000 to 750,000 for each occurrence. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-3

9 Capital Cost Estimates Site Structures: Track bridges and pedestrian bridges were estimated based on their length and perceived degree of difficulty. Square foot unit prices were not used since our estimating experience is that even those unit prices vary with length and complexity. Hence, the estimate was a lump sum estimate judgment call on a site by site basis, based on construction estimating experience. Sound walls were priced at 400/lf., assuming an 8 foot high wall. This is consistent with figures from RS Means. Bus bays and bus bay furniture/canopy were priced at 100,000/bay. The unit prices presented herein contain dollars for mobilization, contractor s profit and home overhead, contractor s field overhead and temporary facilities. However, an additional 10% was inserted for contractor s field overhead and temporary facilities and can be viewed as an additional contingency factor Systems: Cost Category 50 The systems costs are broken down in detail below the main table and are presented in accordance with the FTA standard cost categories. Again, comparable costs from other systems and up to date bid information were used. In researching bid prices, it is evident that the prices vary significantly between projects. But, in looking at the overall figure of 4.25M per mi. for system costs, places the overall total within the range of the totals reviewed for other sources. A 20% factor was added to the unit cost for aerial guideway reflecting the additional costs of overhead catenary and signal foundations on an elevated structure and that more expensive cable trays and transition elements are used. This also covers the cost of grounding and lightning protection. Single track was assumed to be 75% the cost of double track since the number of overhead catenary poles per track foot is double. Fare collection was priced at 100,000 per station. Traffic Control and Signals Traction Power Substations Traction Power Supply and Distribution Communications Command and Control 1.00M/mi. 1.10M/mi. 1.40M/mi. 0.25M/mi. 0.50M/mi. Other costs not on the unit table include the following: 4 quadrant traffic signals RR crossing gate intersection 0.25M 0.50M A 20% contingency was then applied to the systems costs above Right-Of-Way, Land, Existing Improvements: Cost Category 60 Most of the needs for the right of way will be at the station park and ride sites and for the vehicle storage yard. Partial takes and easements along the length of the guideway were also estimated. The total area of acreage needed for the stations is shown in Table 3.2. There, using the previous cost estimate as a basis and adjusting for inflation a figure of 750,000/acre was used for right of way. Costs for condemnation and relocation were estimated at 250,000/acre or 33% of the real estate cost. This is in addition to the 750,000/acre real estate cost. Recognizing that partial takes and easements typically cost more on a square foot basis, a figure of 1,000,000/acre was used for those conditions. Partial takes and easements quantities were estimated based on the conceptual engineering plans in Volume Vehicles: Cost Category 70 Vehicles were estimated at 3.75M plus 0.25M for spare parts for a total of 4M each. This is based on recent orders from other transit agencies such as Minneapolis (3.73M per car in August of 2010 inclusive of spare parts, but a much larger order of 51 cars). Hence, 4.0M per car is reflective of the size of the fleet anticipated (15 vehicles). A 10% contingency was then placed on this figure Professional Services: Cost Category 80 Professional services are estimated as a percentage of construction costs (vehicles and right of way not included) with construction allocated contingencies included. The values used are summarized below and reflect median range values as experience on similar projects: Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech 5.0% Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech 7.0% Project Management for Design and Construction 2.5% Construction Administration & Management 7.0% Professional Liability and other Non Construction Insurance 1.0% Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 2.0% CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection 3.0% Start up 1.0% 3.9. Unallocated Contingencies: Cost Category 90 A figure of 5% of all project costs (construction, vehicles, right of way and professional services) was then applied. An additional project reserve estimate was included and this was an allowance based on 5% of construction costs only, inclusive of allocated contingencies for construction. A previous Triangle Transit cost estimate was basing right of way costs on a per acre basis of 670,000 which did not appear to have a contingency associated with it. It also did not appear to have a relocation allowance either. The station acreage is not site specific per Triangle Transit policy. Site specific park and ride lots will be determined in the environmental phase of the program. As such, actual appraisals are not possible. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-4

10 Capital Cost Estimates Station Name Station Features Table 3.2 Station and Park and Ride Acreage Requirements Program - Park+Ride Spaces Average SF / Parking Space Park+Ride Site Area SF Program Feeder Bus Bays Average SF / Bus Bay Bus Bay Area SF Total Approx. Site Area UNC Hospitals A Walk-In Station. Bus Bays On Street On Street UNC Hospitals C Walk-In Station. Bus Bays On Street On Street Mason Farm Road Parking Ramp Facility Shared with UNC, Bus Bays on Street , , , Hamilton Road Walk-In Station , Friday Center A Walk-In Station , Friday Center B Walk-In Station , Meadowmont Walk-In Station , Woodmont Leigh Village - Surface Lot Gateway Small Parking Lot, Drop-Off/Pick-Up Area, Stormwater Retention. Very Large Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area, Stormwater Retention. Large Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area, Stormwater Retention , , , , , ,000 70, , , ,000 70, , Patterson Place Walk-In Station , MLK Jr. Parkway South Square A South Square B Medium Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area, Stormwater Retention. Medium Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area. Medium Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area , ,000 50, , , ,000 60, , , ,000 60, , LaSalle Street Walk-In Station. Bus Bays On Street On Street Duke Medical Center A Walk-In Station , Duke Medical Center B Walk-In Station , Ninth Street Small Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area , ,000 40, , Buchanan Boulevard Walk-In Station , Durham Medium Parking Lot, Buses in Existing Bus Facility, Drop-Off/Pick-Up Area , , , Dillard Street Walk-In Station , Alston Avenue - Surface Lot Alston Avenue - Parking Ramp Large Parking Lot, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area. 4-Level Parking Ramp, Bus Bays, Drop- Off/Pick-Up Area , ,000 40, , , ,000 40, , D-O Corridor Totals * 3,600 1,822, ,000 2,152, Total Approx. Site Area Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-5

11 Capital Cost Estimates 4. Capital Costs Bus Rapid Transit and Transportation System Management 4.1. Guideway Elements: Cost Category 10 All of the guideway unit costs followed the same methodology as for light rail except eliminating the track items and system items that are not applicable. For each category of guideway (as shown in Table 4.1), the unit cost was reduced by 400/ft. eliminating a delta of 300/ft. for the double track rail and ties (only) and replacing that with pavement. Also eliminated was 100/ft. for special trackwork supply and installation. Ballast and sub ballast would be replaced by base and sub base preparation for the roadway and the amount of cut and fill in the unit prices remain Station Stops, Terminals, Intermodal: Cost Category 20 The cost for the station platform includes the platform, canopy and station furniture, lighting, static signs. Costs for variable message signs, CCTV and public address are included in the systems costs for communications and central control. Station costs do not include the guideway which are part of the guideway costs. Pedestrian bridges were estimated based on length anticipated and the costs ranged from 2.5M to 4.0M. Vertical circulation structures and pedestrian bridges were divided into two separate categories for ease of identification. Unit costs ranged from 0.25M to 4.0M depending on length and complexity. Various allowances for poor materials and mitigation impacts have been distributed throughout the estimate. These allowances were in the range of 250,000 to 750,000 for each occurrence. Site Structures: Roadway bridges and pedestrian bridges were estimated based on their length and perceived degree of difficulty. Square foot unit prices were not used since our estimating experience is that even those unit prices vary with length and complexity. Hence, the estimate was a lump sum estimate judgment call on a site by site basis based on construction estimating experience. Sound walls were priced at 400/lf., assuming an 8 foot high wall. This is consistent with figures from RS Means. Bus bays and bus bay furniture/canopy were priced at 100,000/bay. The unit prices presented herein contain dollars for mobilization, contractor s profit and home overhead, contractor s field overhead and temporary facilities. However, an additional 10% was inserted for contractor s field overhead and temporary facilities and can be viewed as an additional contingency factor Systems: Cost Category 50 The systems costs are broken down in detail below the main table and are presented in accordance with the FTA standard cost categories. Radio based communications was assumed. A 20% factor was added to the unit cost for aerial guideway reflecting the additional costs for working on an elevated structure (and also covers the cost of lightning protection). Fare collection was priced at 100,000 per station. Additional allowances were also made for at grade pedestrian connections as depicted in Volume 1, Appendix A, Station Evaluation. Communications Command and Control 0.10M/mi. 0.25M/mi. At grade station, center platform 1.0M Aerial station, center platform 10.0M Parking stall, at grade, each 5,000 Structured parking stalls, each 20, Support Facilities, Yards, Shops, Administrative Buildings: Cost Category 30 The Maintenance Facility was also a lump sum guesstimate since, at this level of planning effort, many policy decisions regarding the sophistication of the facility and what will be performed in house versus contracted out have not been made. The maintenance building and equipment was assumed to cost 15M for a 2 repair bay, 37,000 sf. facility inclusive of maintenance equipment and all furnishings. An additional allowance was made for an administration/maintenance of way building at 1M and for maintenance of way equipment at another 1M. The estimate for the yard area was 6.0M. The yard was estimated based on a fleet size of 28 articulated buses and parking area, totaling approximately 4 acres of exterior paved area, lighting, vehicle wash, site drainage, utilities, stocking of spare parts, security fencing, and miscellaneous canopies and facilities. A figure of 0.4M provided an allowance for CCTV coverage and monies for central control yard monitoring and communication antennae as needed Sitework and Special Conditions: Cost Category 40 Demolition, clearing and grubbing (Table 3.2 column C) and utility relocations (column D) are in addition to the total guideway unit cost figure in column A+B. Higher costs for utility relocation were assumed for center street running but conversely, lower costs are assumed for demolition, clearing and grubbing since this work is limited to the existing pavement removal. The costs were also compared to figures used on other projects as well. Other costs not on the unit table include the following: 4 quadrant traffic signals 0.25M A 20% contingency was then applied to the systems costs above Right-Of-Way, Land, Existing Improvements: Cost Category 60 Most of the needs for the right of way will be at the station park and ride sites and for the vehicle storage yard. Partial takes and easements along the length of the guideway were also estimated. The total area of acreage needed for the stations is shown in Table 3.2. A previous TTA cost estimate was basing right of way costs on a per acre basis of 670,000 which did not appear to have a contingency associated with it. It also did not appear to have a relocation allowance either. The station acreage is not site specific per Triangle Transit policy. Site specific park and ride lots will be determined in the environmental phase of the program. As such, actual appraisals are not possible. Using the previous cost estimate as a basis and adjusting for inflation, a figure of 750,000/acre was derived for the right of way unit cost. Costs for condemnation and relocation were estimated at 250,000/acre or 33% of the real estate cost. This is in addition to the 750,000/acre real estate cost. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-6

12 Capital Cost Estimates Unit Cost Table by construction type Table 4.1 Unit Cost Summary for Bus Rapid Transit and TSM Alternatives M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E UNIT COST SUMMARY OF ALL DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY BRT and TSM ALTERNATIVES Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Bus Rapid Transit and Transportation System Management Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Cost / foot A. cost/mi B. RR Ops/Force Acct. or Traffic control A + B Guideway Unit Cost/mi. C. Demo, Clear and Grub Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, 32 feet wide (typ.), 350/ft /ft. G/D Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. <20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure D. Utiliites E. Systems F. Mobil. Indirects 10% A-E G. Allocated Allocated Cont, % H. 28.5% of const. with alloc. Cont. A-G Total A-H 30.00% % % % % % Guideway: At-grade double Lane, center of street running, 750/ft /ft. G % Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway, double lane or two single lanes % Traction Power Supply and Distribution Cost / foot Traction power substations Grading 100 Train Control & Signals Drainage and erosion 300 Communications 0.15 control Command and Control Double Lane Aerial 20% more Traction Power Supply and Distribution Traction power substations Train Control & Signals Communications Fare Collection Command and Control Use 0.10 per station Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-7

13 Capital Cost Estimates Recognizing that partial takes and easements typically cost more on a square foot basis, a figure of 1,000,000/acre was used for those conditions. Partial takes and easements quantities were estimated based on the conceptual engineering plans in Volume Vehicles: Cost Category 70 Vehicles were estimated at 900,000 plus 100,000 for spare parts for a total of 1M each. This is based on recent orders from other transit agencies. A 10% contingency was then placed on this figure Professional Services: Cost Category 80 Professional services are estimated as a percentage of construction costs (vehicles and right of way not included) with construction allocated contingencies included. The values used are summarized below and reflect median range values as experience on similar projects: Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech 5.0% Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech 7.0% Project Management for Design and Construction 2.5% Construction Administration & Management 7.0% Professional Liability and other Non Construction Insurance 1.0% Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc. 2.0% CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection 3.0% Start up 1.0% 4.9. Unallocated Contingencies: Cost Category 90 A figure of 5% of all project costs (construction, vehicles, right of way and professional services) was then applied. An additional project reserve estimate was included and this was an allowance based on 5% of construction costs only, inclusive of allocated contingencies for construction. 5. Results A summary of the results are presented in Table 5.1. Table 5.2 summarizes all of the alternatives per the FTA cost categories by line item. Table through present the summaries for each of the LRT alternatives with the column definitions per the FTA SCC standard cost estimating form. Table is the same format for the BRT alternatives. Table is the column summary and quantity detail for the TSM alternative. The breakdown of all the alternatives on a station to station basis, together with the quantities, are displayed in Tables through Alternative Hibbard/ Meadowmont /SS East A1, C1, D3 Mason Farms/ Meadowmont /SS East A3, C1, D3 Hibbard/ Woodmont /SS East A1, C2, D3 Mason Farms/ Woodmont /SS East A3, C2, D3 Hibbard/ Meadowmont /SS West A1, C1, D1 Mason Farms/ Meadowmont /SS West A3, C1, D1 Hibbard/ Woodmont /SS West A1, C2, D1 Mason Farms/ Woodmont /SS West A3, C2, D1 Table 5.1 Summary of Capital Costs Total Project Cost, Length (mi.) M BRT "High" via A-3, Woodmont, SS(E) Cost per Mile M, , , , , , , , , BRT "Low" UNC Station D (A-3), NC 54, Old Chapel Hill Rd., SS-E TSM N/A N/A Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-8

14 Capital Cost Estimates M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E CAPITAL COST SUMMARY OF ALL DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY LRT ALTERNATIVES Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Hibbard/ Mason Farms/ Meadowmont Meadowmont /SS East /SS East A1, C1, D3 A3, C1, D3 Dollars TOTAL Dollars TOTAL Hibbard/ Woodmont /SS East A1, C2, D3 Dollars TOTAL Mason Farms/ Woodmont /SS East A3, C2, D3 Dollars TOTAL Hibbard/ Meadowmont /SS West A1, C1, D1 Dollars TOTAL Mason Farms/ Meadowmont /SS West A3, C1, D1 Dollars TOTAL Table 5.2 Summary Cost of All Alternatives (Rev.13, June 1, 2010) (Rev.13, June 1, 2010) Today's Date Yr of Yr of Revenue Ops Hibbard/ Woodmont /SS West A1, C2, D1 Dollars TOTAL 2/1/11 Today's Date 2/1/ Triangle Transit Yr of GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, 32 feet wide (typ.) Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. <20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure, add 10% if extra high Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade double Lane, center of street running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway, double lane or two Freight Track Relocation. Single Track single lanes Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Automobile Structured parking Automobile Structured parking Automobile parking, parking lot Automobile parking, parking lot Joint development Joint development SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Light Maintenance Facility Light Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Maintenance Facility Expansion Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Yard and Yard Track Yard SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction SYSTEMS 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection Traffic signals and crossing protection Traction power supply: substations Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Communications Fare collection system and equipment Fare collection system and equipment Central Control Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Relocation of existing households and businesses Relocation of existing households and businesses VEHICLES (number) 70 VEHICLES (number) Light Rail Articulated Buses Spare parts Spare parts PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech Project Management for Design and Construction Project Management for Design and Construction Construction Administration & Management Construction Administration & Management Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection Start up Start up Subtotal (10-80) 1, , , , , , , , Subtotal (10-80) UNALLOCATED 5% of Subtotal UNALLOCATED 5% of Subtotal Project 5% of Const. & Right of Way Project 5% of Const. & Right of Way Subtotal (10-90) 1, , , , , , , , Subtotal (10-90) FINANCE CHARGES 100 FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, , , , , , , , Total Pro Mason Farms/ Woodmont /SS West A3, C2, D1 Dollars TOTAL M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E CAPITAL COST SUMMARY DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY BRT and TSM ALTERNATIVES Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE BRT "High" via A-3, Woodmont, SS(E) Dollars TOTAL BRT "Low" UNC Station D (A-3), NC 54, Old Chapel Dollars TOTAL TSM Dollars TOTAL Yr of Revenue Ops Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-9

15 Capital Cost Estimates Table Detail Summary Cost of Alternatives A1, C1, D3 and A3, C1, D3 M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E A-1, C-1, D-3, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square East Today's Date A-3, C-1, D-3, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square East une 1, 2010) une 1, 2010) 2/1/11 Today's Date 2/1/11 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Quantity Dollars Dollars Dollars YOE Dollars Dollars Dollars Dollars Unit Percentage Percentage Allocated Dollars Dollars Unit Allocated Total Quantity Allocated TOTAL Cost of of Cont. TOTAL Cost (X000,000) Construction Total (X000,000) Cost Project Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track Freight Track Relocation, Double track % 31.3% % 30.8% 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Automobile Structured parking , Automobile Structured parking , Automobile parking, parking lot , Automobile parking, parking lot , Joint development Joint development % 7.8% % 8.2% 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Light Maintenance Facility Light Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Yard and Yard Track Yard and Yard Track % 2.6% % 2.6% 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction % 12.1% % 12.1% 50 SYSTEMS 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals % Train control and signals % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Communications % Communications % Fare collection system and equipment % Fare collection system and equipment % Central Control % Central Control % % 8.7% % 8.7% Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 62.4% Comp. cont. Comp. cont. Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 62.4% w/o ROW w/o ROW 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.31% 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.31% Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Relocation of existing households and businesses Relocation of existing households and businesses % Comp. cont % Comp. cont. incl. ROW incl. ROW 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% Light Rail % Light Rail % Spare parts % Spare parts % % % 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Project Management for Design and Construction % Project Management for Design and Construction % Construction Administration & Management % Construction Administration & Management % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % Start up % Start up % % 17.8% % 17.8% Subtotal (10-80) 1, % Subtotal (10-80) 1, % 90 UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Subtotal (10-90) 1, Subtotal (10-90) 1, FINANCE CHARGES 100 FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Dollars Percentage of Construction Cost Dollars Percentage of Total Project Cost YOE Dollars Total Allocated Cont. Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-10

16 Capital Cost Estimates Table Detail Summary Cost of Alternatives A1, C2, D3 and A3, C2, D3 M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E A-1, C-2, D-3, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square East Today's Date A-3, C-2, D-3, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square East une 1, 2010) une 1, 2010) 2/1/11 Today's Date 2/1/11 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Quantity Dollars Dollars Dollars YOE Dollars Dollars Dollars Dollars Unit Percentage Percentage Allocated Dollars Dollars Unit Allocated Total Quantity Allocated TOTAL Cost of of Cont. TOTAL Cost (X000,000) Construction Total (X000,000) Cost Project Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track Freight Track Relocation, Double track % 31.4% % 30.9% 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Automobile Structured parking , Automobile Structured parking , Automobile parking, parking lot , Automobile parking, parking lot , Joint development Joint development % 7.1% % 7.5% 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Light Maintenance Facility Light Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Yard and Yard Track Yard and Yard Track % 2.6% % 2.6% 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction % 12.0% % 12.1% 50 SYSTEMS 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals % Train control and signals % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Communications % Communications % Fare collection system and equipment % Fare collection system and equipment % Central Control % Central Control % % 8.8% % 8.8% Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 61.9% Comp. cont. Comp. cont. Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 61.9% w/o ROW w/o ROW 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.29% Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Relocation of existing households and businesses Relocation of existing households and businesses % Comp. cont % Comp. cont. incl. ROW incl. ROW 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% Light Rail % Light Rail % Spare parts % Spare parts % % % 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) 80 PROFE Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Project Management for Design and Construction % Project Management for Design and Construction % Construction Administration & Management % Construction Administration & Management % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % Start up % Start up % % 17.6% % 17.6% Subtotal (10-80) 1, % Subtotal (10-80) 1, % 90 UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Subtotal (10-90) 1, Subtotal (10-90) 1, FINANCE CHARGES 100 FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Dollars Percentage of Construction Cost Dollars Percentage of Total Project Cost YOE Dollars Total Allocated Cont. Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-11

17 Capital Cost Estimates une 1, 2010) une 1, 2010) 2/1/11 Today's Date 2/1/11 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Quantity (X000,000) Dollars Allocated Dollars TOTAL Table Detail Summary Cost of Alternatives A1, C1, D1 and A3, C1, D1 M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E A-1, C-1, D-1, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square West Today's Date A-3, C-1, D-1, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square West Dollars Unit Cost Dollars Percentage of Const. Cost Dollars Percentage of Total Project Cost YOE Dollars Total Allocated Cont. 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track Freight Track Relocation, Double track % 31.0% % 30.5% 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Automobile Structured parking , Automobile Structured parking , Automobile parking, parking lot , Automobile parking, parking lot , Joint development Joint development % 8.0% % 8.3% 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 30 SUPPO Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Light Maintenance Facility Light Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Yard and Yard Track Yard and Yard Track % 2.6% % 2.6% 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction % 12.2% % 12.2% 50 SYSTEMS 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals % Train control and signals % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Communications % Communications % Fare collection system and equipment % Fare collection system and equipment % Central Control % Central Control % % 8.6% % 8.7% Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 62.3% Comp. cont. Comp. cont. Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 62.3% w/o ROW w/o ROW 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.34% 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.33% Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Relocation of existing households and businesses Relocation of existing households and businesses % Comp. cont % Comp. cont. incl. ROW incl. ROW 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% Light Rail % Light Rail % Spare parts % Spare parts % % % 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Project Management for Design and Construction % Project Management for Design and Construction % Construction Administration & Management % Construction Administration & Management % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % Start up % Start up % % 17.8% % 17.8% Subtotal (10-80) 1, % Subtotal (10-80) 1, % 90 UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Subtotal (10-90) 1, Subtotal (10-90) 1, FINANCE CHARGES 100 FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Quantity (X000,000) Dollars Allocated Dollars TOTAL Dollars Unit Cost Dollars Percentage of Construction Cost Dollars Percentage of Total Project Cost YOE Dollars Total Allocated Cont. Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-12

18 Capital Cost Estimates Table Detail Summary Cost of Alternatives A1, C2, D1 and A3, C2, D1 M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E A-1, C-2, D-1, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square West Today's Date A-3, C-2, D-1, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square West une 1, 2010) une 1, 2010) 2/1/11 Today's Date 2/1/11 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Light Rail Capital Cost Estimate Yr of 2011 Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Quantity Dollars Dollars Dollars YOE Dollars Dollars Dollars Dollars Unit Percentage Percentage Allocated Dollars Dollars Unit Allocated Total Quantity Allocated TOTAL Cost of of Cont. TOTAL Cost (X000,000) Construction Total (X000,000) Cost Project Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 45% Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running % Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track Freight Track Relocation, Double track % 31.1% % 30.6% 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Automobile Structured parking , Automobile Structured parking , Automobile parking, parking lot , Automobile parking, parking lot , Joint development Joint development % 7.2% % 7.6% 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Light Maintenance Facility Light Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Yard and Yard Track Yard and Yard Track % 2.7% % 2.7% 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction % 12.2% % 12.2% 50 SYSTEMS 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals % Train control and signals % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power supply: substations % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail % Communications % Communications % Fare collection system and equipment % Fare collection system and equipment % Central Control % Central Control % % 8.7% % 8.8% Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 61.9% Comp. cont. Comp. cont. Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 61.8% w/o ROW w/o ROW 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.33% 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.32% Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Relocation of existing households and businesses Relocation of existing households and businesses % Comp. cont % Comp. cont. incl. ROW incl. ROW 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.4% Light Rail % Light Rail % Spare parts % Spare parts % % % 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Project Management for Design and Construction % Project Management for Design and Construction % Construction Administration & Management % Construction Administration & Management % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % Start up % Start up % % 17.6% % 17.6% Subtotal (10-80) 1, % Subtotal (10-80) 1, % 90 UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Subtotal (10-90) 1, Subtotal (10-90) 1, FINANCE CHARGES 100 FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Total Project Cost (10-100) 1, Dollars Percentage of Construction Cost Dollars Percentage of Total Project Cost YOE Dollars Total Allocated Cont. Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-13

19 Capital Cost Estimates M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T. CAPITAL COST SUMMARY OF BUS RAPID TRANSIT "HIGH" ALTERNATIVE Today's Date Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Yr of Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Table Detail Summary Cost of Alternatives for BRT High and BRT Low M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T. CAPITAL COST SUMMARY OF BUS RAPID TRANSIT "Low" ALTERNATIVE une 1, 2010) une 1, 2010) 2/1/11 Today's Date 2/1/ Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Yr of 2011 Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Quantity Dollars Dollars Dollars YOE Dollars Dollars Dollars Dollars YOE Dollars Dollars Dollars Unit Percentage Percentage Allocated Dollars Dollars Unit Percentage Percentage Allocated Allocated Total Quantity Allocated Total TOTAL Cost of of Cont. TOTAL Cost of of Cont. (X000,000) Construction Total (X000,000) Construction Total Cost Project Cost Cost Project Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, 32 feet wide (typ.) Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, 32 feet wide (typ.) Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. <20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. <20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: Aerial structure % % Guideway: At-grade double Lane, center of street running % Guideway: At-grade double Lane, centere of street running % Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway, double lane or two Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway, double lane or two single lanes single lanes % 35.8% % 30.3% 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators per stall Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators per stall Automobile Structured parking , Automobile Structured parking , Automobile parking, parking lot , Automobile parking, parking lot , Joint development Joint development % 8.1% % 8.2% 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting Light Maintenance Facility Light Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Heavy Maintenance Facility Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Yard Yard % 2.9% % 3.3% 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction % 11.7% % 15.7% 50 SYSTEMS 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals 20% Train control and signals 20% Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traffic signals and crossing protection % Traction power supply: substations 20% Traction power supply: substations 20% Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail 20% Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail 20% Communications % Communications % Fare collection system and equipment % Fare collection system and equipment % Central Control % Central Control % % 2.4% % 3.0% Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 60.9% Comp. cont. Comp. cont. Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 60.5% w/o ROW w/o ROW 60 ROW, L Acres 30.42% 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 30.46% Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Relocation of existing households and businesses Relocation of existing households and businesses % Comp. cont % Comp. cont. incl. ROW incl. ROW 70 VEHICLES (number) 30.4% 70 VEHICLES (number) 30.4% Articulated Buses % Articulated Buses % Spare parts % Spare parts % % % 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Project Management for Design and Construction % Project Management for Design and Construction % Construction Administration & Management % Construction Administration & Management % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % Start up % Start up % % 17.3% % 17.2% Subtotal (10-80) % Subtotal (10-80) % 90 UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Project 5% of Construction 5.0% Subtotal (10-90) Subtotal (10-90) FINANCE CHARGES 100 FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-14

20 Capital Cost Estimates Table Column Summary and Quantity Detail for TSM Alternative M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T. CAPITAL COST SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS Quantity (X000,000) Dollars Allocated Dollars TOTAL Dollars Unit Cost Dollars Percentage of Construction Cost Today's Date Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County Yr of Alternatives Analysis, Application for PE Yr of Revenue Ops Dollars Percentage of Total Project Cost une 1, 2010) 2/1/ YOE Dollars Total Allocated Cont. M A I N W O R K S H E E T - B U I L D A L T E R N A T I V E Transportation System Management Improvements Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) Feet per mile Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, 2 16 foot lanes GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. <20 feet Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive, 2 16 foot lanes Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill RR, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet % Guideway: At-grade double Lane, center of street running 45% Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway, double lane or two 7.20 single lanes Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet % 10.2% STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Guideway: Aerial structure Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators Guideway: At-grade double Lane, center of street running Automobile Structured parking Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway, double lane or two Automobile parking, parking lot ,000 single lanes Joint development % 6.2% SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS Administration Building: Office, sales, storage, revenue counting 20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) Maintenance Facility Expansion At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Maintenance Facility Expansion Heavy Maintenance Facility inclusive of utilites, demo and clea Storage or Maintenance of Way Building Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Yard Pedestrian Overpasses to Station % 7.7% Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Cost 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Automobile Structured parking 20,000 Vehicles Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Spare Parts Site Utilities, Utility Relocation Joint development Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatment 1, Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks % 10.3% Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls SYSTEMS ` Train control and signals 20% Bridges LS Traffic signals and crossing Improvements % Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking Traction power supply: substations 20% Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail 20% Communications % Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% Fare collection system and equipment 20% Central Control % 50 SYSTEMS % 1.8% Train control and signals Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 36.3% Comp. cont Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing 0.70 w/o ROW 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS Acres 29.45% Purchase or lease of real estate, Station areas Traction power supply: substations Purchase or lease of real estate, line section Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Relocation of existing households and businesses Communications % Comp. cont Fare Collection incl. ROW 70 VEHICLES (number) 29.7% Central Control Articulated Buses % Spare parts % Construction Subtotal (10-50) % 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres 80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (applies to Cats ) Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Maintenance Site Preliminary Engineering, DEIS & FEIS, ROW Def., Survey & Geotech % 1.00 Line Sect. easements Final Design & ROW Engineering, Survey & Geotech % Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Project Management for Design and Construction % Construction Administration & Management % Other Professional Liability and other Non-Construction Insurance %, Const. & ROW 29.68% Legal; Permits; Review Fees by other agencies, cities, etc % 29.45% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % CM Surveys, Testing, Investigation, QA/QC Inspection % Unallocated 5.00% Start up % Project Reserve 6.47% % 10.3% Subtotal (10-80) % Total Project Cost (10-100) UNALLOCATED of Subtotal 5.0% 3.95 Project 5% of Construction 5.0% 1.53 Subtotal (10-90) FINANCE CHARGES Total Project Cost (10-100) Base Year Dollars Unit Cost Base Year From Station Facilities Improvements To Station From Station Vehicles and Maintenance To Station Quantity Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-15

21 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-3, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D3 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Tail Track UNC Alt. 1, to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center Friday Center to Meadowmont Dollars Unit Cost To Station 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF 4115 TF 1665 TF 5840 TF 7610 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC 54 add 20% for long span Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) Name At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option C Station Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Meadowmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Friday Center Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Circulation is going up Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20,000 No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Hibbard road crossings/gates Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres 1.00 Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.39% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-16

22 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-3, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D3 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Meadowmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square East Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.39% 29.31% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 3190 TF 6535 TF Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Sound Walls Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork 1.00 South Square East road crossings/gates 1.50 Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, access roads, Westgate, Shannon 2.00 Larchmont, MLK (major) Xing gates Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-17

23 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-3, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D3 - Station to Station (continued) South Square East to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Capital Cost Estimates Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform 2220 TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo LaSalle St Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Overexcavation Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing 2 gates, 2 traffic signals Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.39% 29.31% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) by CRT Overexcavation Duke Mitigation Bus Bays in street Frontage Road Reconstruction Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene Ninth St., Campus Pedestrian Bridge Linking Modes Gregson 3.00 Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT 0.25 Pettigre Roadwork LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-18

24 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-3, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D3 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Overexcavation Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.39% 29.31% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-19

25 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-3, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D3 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Tail Track to UNC Option D Station UNC Alt. 3 - Option D to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center Friday Center to Meadowmont Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF TF 1665 TF 5840 TF 7610 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC 54 add 20% for long span Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option D Sta Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Meadowmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Friday Center Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Ped Bridge up West St Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20, feet No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Mason Farms Road Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 0.90 reconstruction by UNC SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Mason Farm road crossings/gates Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres 1.00 Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-20

26 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-3, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D3 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% 29.31% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 3190 TF 6535 TF Leigh Village Overexcavation Gateway Patterson Place MLK South Square East Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Meadowmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square East 3 road crossings/gates Sound Walls Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, access roads, Westgate, Shannon 2.00 Larchmont, MLK (major) Xing gates Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-21

27 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-3, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D3 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% 29.31% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) South Square East to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center 2220 TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction LaSalle St. Overexcavation Duke Mitigation Bus Bays in street Frontage Road Reconstruction Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Pedestrian Bridge Linking M by CRT Overexcavation Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson 3.00 Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT 0.25 Pettigre Roadwork Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. eas Line Sect. eas Line Sect. eas Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-22

28 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-3, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D3 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% 29.31% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Overexcavation Admin Building 1.00 Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. eas Line Sect. eas NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-23

29 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-3, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D3 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost Tail Track UNC Alt. 1, to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center (at-grade) Friday Center to Woodmont 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF 4115 TF 1665 TF 2360 TF 4840 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure, add 10% if extra high plus NC 54 Xin Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) Name At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option C Mason Farms Hamilton St Friday Center 2.00 Woodmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform ` Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Circulation is going up Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20,000 No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Hibbard 0.50 Friday Center, Barbee Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, Sta. Parking, Sta. Parking, Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. eas Line Sect. eas Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-24

30 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-3, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D3 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure, add 10% if extra high Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 3190 TF 6535 TF Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK Overexcavation South Square East Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Roadwork, mitigation Crescent Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% 29. Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Woodmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square East Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, access roads, Westgate, Shannon 2.00 Larchmont, MLK (major) Xing gates Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-25

31 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-3, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D3 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates South Square East to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure, add 10% if extra high Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% 29. Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 2220 TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction LaSalle St. Overexcavation Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Pedestrian Bridge Linking M by CRT Overexcavation Duke Mitigation Bus Bays in street Frontage Road Reconstruction Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson 3.00 Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT 0.25 Pettigre Roadwork Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. eas Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-26 -

32 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-3, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D3 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure, add 10% if extra high Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.38% 29. Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Overexcavation Admin Building 1.00 Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-27

33 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-3, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D3 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Tail Track to UNC Option D Station UNC Alt. 3 - Option D to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center (at-grade) Friday Center to Woodmont Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF TF 1665 TF 2360 TF 4840 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option D Sta Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Friday Center 2.00 Woodmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform ` Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Ped Bridge up West St Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20, feet No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Mason Farms Road reconstruction by Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 0.90 UNC SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Mason Farm 0.50 Friday Center, Barbee Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.37% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.46% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-28

34 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-3, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D3 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Woodmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square East Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing TF TF TF 3190 TF 6535 TF Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK Overexcavation Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.37% 29.29% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.46% Total Project Cost (10-100) South Square East Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls Redo Farrington (North) Bridge 1.25 Bus bays Roadwork, mitigation Crescent Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, access roads, Westgate, Shannon 2.00 Larchmont, MLK (major) Xing gates Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-29

35 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-3, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D3 - Station to Station (continued) South Square East to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Capital Cost Estimates Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing 2220 TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo LaSalle St Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Overexcavation Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.37% 29.29% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.46% Total Project Cost (10-100) - Pedestrian Bridge Linking Modes by CRT Overexcavation Duke Mitigatio Bus Bays in street Frontage Road Reconstruction Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson 3.00 Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT 0.25 Pettigre Roadwork Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-30

36 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-3, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square East Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D3 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.37% 29.29% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.46% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St. Overexcavation Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building 1.00 Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-31

37 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-1, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D1 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost Tail Track UNC Alt. 1, to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center Friday Center to Meadowmont 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF 4115 TF 1665 TF 5840 TF 7610 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC 54 add 20% for long span Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) Name At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option C Station Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Meadowmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Friday Center Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Circulation is going up Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20,000 No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Hibbard road crossings/gates Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres 1.00 Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-32

38 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-1, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Meadowmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square West Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing TF TF TF 3190 TF 2800 TF Leigh Village Overexcavation Gateway Patterson Place MLK South Square West Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Duke Mitigation 0.75 Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Sound Walls Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork road crossings/gates 1.50 Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, 3.00 Westgate 0.50 Larchmont, MLK (major) Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-33

39 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-1, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates South Square West to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction LaSalle St. Overexcavation Frontage Road Reconstruction Double cost fo cost for compl Duke Ninth St Buchannon S Durham Multi Pedestrian Br by CRT Overexcavation Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson Bus bays Bus bays, by Pettigre Road Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. eas Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-34

40 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-1, D-1, Hibbard/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C1, D1 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St Alston Ave Maintenance Admin Buildin 1.00 Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Spare Parts Overexcavatio Chapel Hill, R 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect NCRR ROW Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-35

41 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-1, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D1 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Tail Track to UNC Option D Station UNC Alt. 3 - Option D to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center Friday Center to Meadowmont Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF TF 1665 TF 5840 TF 7610 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC 54 add 20% for long span Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option D Sta Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Meadowmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Friday Center Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Ped Bridge up West St Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20, feet No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Mason Farms Road Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 0.90 reconstruction by UNC SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Mason Farm road crossings/gates Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres 1.00 Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-36

42 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-1, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Meadowmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square West Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% 29.33% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 3190 TF 2800 TF Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK Overexcavation South Square West Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Duke Mitigation 0.75 Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Sound Walls Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork road crossings/gates 1.50 Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, 3.00 Westgate 0.50 Larchmont, MLK (major) Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-37

43 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-1, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Overexcavation Frontage Road Reconstruction Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% 29.33% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% South Square West to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Double cost for complete street reconstruction LaSalle St. Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Pedestrian Bridge Linking Modes by CRT Overexcavation Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT Pettigre Roadwork Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. eas Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-38

44 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-1, D-1, Mason Farms/Meadowmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C1, D1 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% 29.33% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St. Overexcavation Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building 1.00 Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-39

45 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-1, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D1 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Station Equations Tail Track UNC Alt. 1, to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center (at-grade) Friday Center to Woodmont Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF 4115 TF 1665 TF 2360 TF 4840 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) Name At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option C Station Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Friday Center 2.00 Woodmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform ` Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Circulation is going up Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20,000 No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Hibbard 0.50 Friday Center, Barbee Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.41% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-40

46 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-1, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.41% 29.33% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 3190 TF 2800 TF Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK South Square West Overexcavation Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Duke Mitigation 0.75 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Roadwork, mitigation Crescent Woodmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square West Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, 3.00 Westgate 0.50 Larchmont, MLK (major) Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-41

47 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-1, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates South Square West to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.41% 29.33% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction LaSalle St. Overexcavation Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Pedestrian Bridge Linking M by CRT Overexcavation Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson 3.00 Frontage Road Reconstruct 0.50 Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT Pettigre Roadwork Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-42

48 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-1, C-2, D-1, Hibbard/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A1, C2, D1 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.41% 29.33% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St. Overexcavation Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building Cost 1.00 Vehicles Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. eas Maint. Of Way NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-43

49 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-1, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D1 - Station to Station Capital Cost Estimates Station Equations Tail Track to UNC Option D Station UNC Alt. 3 - Option D to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center (at-grade) Friday Center to Woodmont Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi. TF TF 1665 TF 2360 TF 4840 TF Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option D Sta Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Friday Center 2.00 Woodmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform ` Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Ped Bridge up West St Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20, feet No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks 0.25 Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Mason Farms Road Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 0.90 reconstruction by UNC SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Mason Farm 0.50 Friday Center, Barbee Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-44

50 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-1, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Woodmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square West Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% 29.32% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 3190 TF 2800 TF Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK South Square West Overexcavation Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Duke Mitigation 0.75 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Roadwork, mitigation Crescent Sta. Parking, acres Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 1.00 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, 3.00 Westgate 0.50 Larchmont, MLK (major) Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-45

51 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-1, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D1 - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates South Square West to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% 29.32% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) TF TF TF 2600 TF 4490 TF Double cost for complete street reconstruction LaSalle St. Overexcavation Frontage Road Reconstruction Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Pedestrian Bridge Linking M by CRT Overexcavation Ninth St., Campus 3.00 Gregson Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT Pettigre Roadwork Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene 1.25 LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.25 Swift, Buchannon 1.00 Duke St gates, 2 traffic signals and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-46

52 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE A-3, C-2, D-1, Mason Farms/Woodmont/South Square West Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange Co. Light Rail, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative A3, C2, D1 Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Track and Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Track and Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Track and Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Track and Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway: At-grade in pavement, Single track, curb running 8.07 Guideway, At-grade in pavement, double track, center running Guideway: At-grade parallel to roadway Freight Track Relocation. Single Track Freight Track Relocation, Double track STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 29.40% 29.32% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.47% Total Project Cost (10-100) 8380 TF TF TF Yard Track Dillard St. Overexcavation Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building Cost 1.00 Vehicles Spare Parts Chapel Hill, Roxboro 4.00 Alston 3.00 Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Dillard, Mangum 1.00 Fayetteville Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Maint. Of Way NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-47

53 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "High" Alternative Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT High Alternative - Station to Station Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Capital Cost Estimates Tail Track to UNC Option D Station UNC Alt. 3 - Option D to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center (at-grade) Friday Center to Woodmont Dollars Unit Cost To Station 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC 54 Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option D Sta Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Friday Center Woodmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform ` Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Ped Bridge up West St Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20, feet No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Golf Course Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Mason Farms Road by Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 0.68 reconstruction UNC SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Mason Farm 0.25 Friday Center, Barbee Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.35% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-48

54 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "High" Alternative Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT High Alternative - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Woodmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to Patterson Place Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square East Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.35% 30.42% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Leigh Village Gateway Patterson Place MLK Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 1.50 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Roadwork, mitigation Crescent Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork 1.00 South Square East Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 0.50 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, access roads, Westgate, Shannon 1.00 Larchmont, MLK (major) Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-49

55 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "High" Alternative Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT High Alternative - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates South Square East to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Double cost for complete street reconstruction Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo LaSalle St Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.35% 30.42% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Overexcavation by CRT Overexcavation Duke Mitigation Bus Bays in street Frontage Road Reconstruction Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene Pedestrian Bridge Linking Modes Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT 0.25 Pettigre Roadwork LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.00 Ninth, Swift, Buchannon, Campus 1.00 Duke St., Gregson 0.50 and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A

56 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "High" Alternative Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT High Alternative Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Dillard St Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Overexcavation Spare Parts Ped Links 0.25 Bus bays Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.35% 30.42% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site NCRR ROW FEE Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-51

57 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "Low" Alternative Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT Low Alternative - Station to Station Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Capital Cost Estimates Tail Track to UNC Option D Station UNC Alt. 3 - Option D to Mason Farms Road Mason Farms Road to Hamilton Hamilton to Friday Center (at-grade) Friday Center to Woodmont Dollars Unit Cost To Station 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure (extra high plus NC Xing, add 10%) Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform UNC Option D Sta Mason Farms Road Hamilton St Friday Center Woodmont Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform ` Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Ped Bridge up West St Ped Conn. - Dean Dome Automobile Structured parking 20, feet No elevators or escalators Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS LF LF Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1,000 Overexcavation Overexcavation Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Wetland Mitigation Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 Sound Walls Sound Walls Sound Walls ` Bridges LS Pedestrian Bridge 3.50 Pedestrian Bridge Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Links to Parking 0.25 Links to Parking 0.25 Ped Links 0.25 Ped Links Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots 0.10 Bus bays Bus bays Mason Farms Road by Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 0.68 reconstruction UNC SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Mason Farm 0.25 Hamilton (2) 0.50 Friday Center, Barbee Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% (2 properties) Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.38% % Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-52

58 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "Low" Alternative Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT Low Alternative - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Woodmont to Leigh Village Leigh Village to Gateway Gateway to New Patterson Place New Patterson Place to MLK MLK to South Square East Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Leigh Village Gateway Farrington/University Place MLK South Square East Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.38% 30.46% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Overexcavation Overexcavation Wetlands Wetlands 3.00 Sound Walls Sound Walls Bus bays Roadwork, mitigation Crescent Redo Farrington (North) Bridge Bus bays Bus bays Bus bays Added Grade Crossing Roadwork Farrington (south),old Chapel Road 0.50 Durham, Garrett, Snow Crest Trail, access roads, Westgate, Shannon 1.50 Larchmont, MLK (major) D-CH Blvd Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements I-40 Bridge Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-53

59 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "Low" Alternative Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT Low Alternative - Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates South Square East to LaSalle LaSalle to Duke Medical Duke Medical to Ninth Street Ninth Street to Buchanan Buchanan to Durham Multi Modal Center Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Double cost for complete Double cost for complete street reconstruction redo LaSalle St Duke Medical Ninth St Buchannon St Durham Multi-Modal Center Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.38% 30.46% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Overexcavation by CRT Overexcavation Duke Mitigation Bus Bays in street Frontage Road Reconstruction Pickett, Cornwallis, Cameron, Morreene Bus bays Bus bays, by CRT 0.25 Pettigre Roadwork LaSalle and Research Dr Fulton, Trent, Emergency Cr., flowers, 1.00 Ninth, Swift, Buchannon, Campus 1.00 Duke St., Gregson 0.50 and 15th Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Sta. Parking, acres Line Sect. easements Pedestrian Bridge Linking Modes Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A

60 MAIN WORKSHEET - BUILD ALTERNATIVE Bus Rapid Transit "Low" Alternative Triangle Transit, Durham-Orange County, Alternatives Analysis Station Equations Table Detail Quantities and Cost of Alternative for BRT Low Alternative Station to Station (continued) Capital Cost Estimates Durham Multi Modal Center to Dillard Dillard to Alston Tail Track & Maintenance Building & Vehicles Dollars Unit Cost 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS (route miles) /mi Guideway,At-grade semi-exclusive double lane Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Med. Hght. 10 to 20 feet Guideway,At-grade, built up fill - Large Height 20 to 40 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Medium Height, <15 feet Guideway: Retained cut or fill, Large Height, 15 to 30 feet Guideway: Aerial structure Guideway, At-grade double Lane, center of Street running Guideway: At-grade, double Lane, parallel to roadway STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL (number) At-grade station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Aerial station, stop, shelter, mall, terminal, platform Pedestrian Overpasses to Station Vertical Circulation to/from cross streets. Structure & Elevators LS Automobile Structured parking 20, Automobile parking, parking lot 5, Joint development 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Demolition, Clearing, Earthwork from table Site Utilities, Utility Relocation from table Haz. mat'l, contam'd soil removal/mitigation, ground water treatments 1, Environmental mitigation, e.g. wetlands, historic/archeologic, parks Site structures including retaining walls, sound walls 400 ` Bridges LS Pedestrian / bike access and accommodation, landscaping LS Automobile, bus, van accessways including roads, parking lots Temporary Facilities and other indirect costs during construction 10% 50 SYSTEMS Train control and signals Traffic signals and crossing protection, include roadwork at Xing Dillard St. Overexcavation Alston Ave Maintenance Facility Admin Building Maint. Of Way Cost Vehicles Spare Parts Bus bays Traction power supply: substations Traction power distribution: catenary and third rail Communications Fare Collection Central Control Construction Subtotal (10-50) 60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS M/Acres Purchase or lease of real estate 0.75 Sta. Parking, acres Relocation of existing households and businesses 35% Other 60-90, Const. & ROW 30.38% 30.46% Project Administration, on Construction + Const % Unallocated 5.00% Project Reserve 6.52% Total Project Cost (10-100) Acres Acres Acres Sta. Parking, acres Yard Site Line Sect. easements Line Sect. easements NCRR ROW FEE Durham Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 A-55

61 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates

62 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates VOLUME 3 SECTION B LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATES DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Prepared for TRIANGLE TRANSIT Prepared by URS TEAM July 2011 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-i

63 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY COST CATEGORIES LIGHT RAIL OPERATING SCENARIOS LIGHT RAIL SERVICE PLANS O&M COST ITEMS AND UNITS OF SERVICE PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS AND UNIT COSTS O&M COST MODEL AND RESULTS... 4 APPENDIX A: OPERATING STATISTICS... 8 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2 1: O&M COST CATEGORIES AND ASSOCIATED COST ITEMS... 2 TABLE 2 2: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE PLAN FOR LRT SCENARIO TABLE 2 3: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE PLAN FOR LRT SCENARIO TABLE 2 4: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR LRT SCENARIO TABLE 2 5: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR LRT SCENARIO TABLE 2 6: LRT SCENARIO 1 ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 5 TABLE 2 7: LRT SCENARIO 2 ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 6 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-ii

64 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates 1. Introduction This report documents the operating and maintenance (O&M) cost methodology, assumptions, and estimates for the light rail transit (LRT) alternative for the Durham Orange Corridor as part of the Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis study. 2. Methodology The introduction of new light rail service will result in annual operating and maintenance costs. The costs of providing light rail service will occur in terms of the following functions: Vehicle operations; Vehicle maintenance and power consumption; Maintenance of way; Warranty & Parts; Maintenance of stations; General Administration Other costs; and Transit Security and Safety. To estimate the operations and maintenance costs associated with an introduction of light rail, a cost allocation operating and maintenance model was developed to calculate the costs associated with this new service. A cost allocation model assumes that the expenses incurred in providing transit service are driven by key service variables such as annual revenue train hours, total cars, annual revenue car miles, route miles, stations, and annual revenue car hours. For each expense line item, service variables are multiplied by unit costs and productivity ratios (for labor expenses) to calculate the costs for each expense line item Cost Categories The cost categories for the O&M cost model that were used to estimate the operating and maintenance costs for the light rail alternative includes: Vehicle Operations: Annual costs associated with vehicle operations such as rail operators and rail operation supervisors wages; Vehicle Maintenance and Power Consumption: Annual costs associated with vehicle maintenance such as mechanics and supervisors wages, vehicle maintenance materials (spare parts, lubricants, tools and uniforms/protective clothing for both vehicle and track maintenance staff, etc.) and costs associated with traction power (e.g., electricity or fuel); Maintenance of Way: Annual costs associated with right of way maintenance, such as technicians and supervisors wages, track maintainers, train control and communications equipment, and maintenance materials; Warranty & Parts: Annual costs associated with labor costs for warranty and parts staff; Maintenance of Stations: Annual costs associated with station maintenance, such as graffiti removal, station utilities (electricity and water), and repairs and materials for stations. General Administration: Costs associated with finance, purchasing, payroll, human relations, etc. Other Costs: Costs associated with casualty and insurance and revenue collection including the maintenance and servicing of ticket vending machines at stations. Transit Security and Safety: Annual Costs associated with the enforcement of safety and security on vehicles and at park and ride lots, transit facilities, and garages. The first step in developing the O&M cost model was to develop cost categories and to assign associated cost items as shown in Table 2 1. For the purposes of developing these cost estimates, the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) LNYX light rail system was identified as a peer system as it is most likely to be similar in cost structure and operations to a light rail system in the Triangle Region. The O&M cost categories, productivity ratios, and unit costs used to develop these estimates are based on data previously used to develop O&M cost estimates for the CATS Lynx Blue Line Extension Study in The following sections describe the components used to develop the O&M cost model and results. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-1

65 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 1: O&M Cost Categories and Associated Cost Items Cost category Cost item Vehicle Operations Rail Operators Rail Operations Supervisors (Controllers, Dispatching, and Field Supervisors) Vehicle Maintenance and Power Consumption Traction Power Rail Car Electro Mechanics Rail Car Servicers Rail Shop Machinists Rail Car Maintenance Supervisors Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services Maintenance-of-Way Maintenance Of Way (MOW) Technicians Rail MOW Supervisors Track Maintainers Track Laborers Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services Warranty & Parts Warranty & Parts Manager Warranty & Parts Specialist Stores Clerk Receiving Clerk Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services Light Rail Maintenance Facility General Administration General Administration Other Costs Casualty and Insurance Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe Revenue Collection General Administration Costs Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe General Administration Insurance Light Rail Operating Scenarios Two light rail operating scenarios were developed to provide an understanding of the differences in scale of O&M costs related to operating a light rail service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 1,500 passengers (LRT Scenario 1) and service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 800 passengers (LRT Scenario 2). For LRT Scenario 1, to achieve a peak hour passenger capacity of 1,500 passengers it was calculated that a fleet of 10 light rail vehicles (LRV) would be needed for peak service (not including spares). This is based on the following operating parameters: 10 minute peak headways Each LRV was assumed to have a total passenger capacity of 150 passengers. 10 LRVs per hour during the peak period * 150 passenger per LRV = 1,500 passengers Similarly, for LRT Scenario 2, to achieve a peak hour passenger capacity of 800 passengers, it was calculated that a fleet of 6 light rail vehicles (LRV) would be needed for peak service (not including spares). This is based on the following operating parameters: Service plans, operating statistics, and O&M cost estimates for LRT Scenarios 1 and 2 were prepared and are presented in the following sections Light Rail Service Plans A service plan defining the operation of the Durham Orange County Corridor light rail was created and used in the calculation of units of service which were inputted into the O&M cost model. Table 2 2 lists the operating assumptions for the light rail service under LRT Scenario 1 and Table 2 3 lists the assumptions for LRT Scenario 2. Table 2 2: Durham Orange County Service Plan for LRT Scenario 1 (1,500 passenger peak hour capacity) Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles Average Operating Speed (mph) 29.6 mph End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 35 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 5 minutes Round Trip Cycle time (minutes) 80 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 10 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 20 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 20 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM-9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Trains Required 8 peak trains Number of Off-Peak Trains Required 4 off peak trains Number of Peak Vehicles Required 12 cars Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare cars Total Fleet Size 15 cars Number of Cars per Train-Set for Peak Service 1 and 2 cars per trainset Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service 1 car per trainset Total Number of Stations 17 stations AM and PM Peak period train and car assignments: Trains 1, 2, 5 and 6 are one car trainsets (i.e., one vehicle per train) = 4 vehicles Trains 3, 4, 7 and 8 are two car trainsets (i.e., two vehicles per train) =8 vehicles 10 minute peak headways Each LRV was assumed to have a total passenger capacity of 150 passengers 6 LRVs per hour during the peak period * 150 passenger per LRV = 900 passengers (it is recognized that this is above the 800 passenger capacity threshold) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-2

66 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 3: Durham Orange County Service Plan for LRT Scenario 2 (800 passenger peak hour capacity) Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles Average Operating Speed (mph) 29.6 mph End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 35 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 5 minutes Round Trip Cycle time (minutes) 80 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 10 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 20 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 20 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 5:30AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (5:30AM-9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Trains Required 8 peak trains Number of Off-Peak Trains Required 4 off peak trains Number of Peak Vehicles Required 8 cars Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 2 spare cars Total Fleet Size 10 cars Number of Cars per Train-Set for Peak Service 1 car per trainset Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service 1 car per trainset Total Number of Stations 17 stations AM and PM Peak period train and car assignments: Trains 1 through 8 are one car trainsets (i.e., one vehicle per train) = 8 vehicles O&M Cost Items and Units of Service Next, for each of the O&M cost items, a unit of service (i.e., service variable) was calculated and assigned as shown in Table 2 3. sensitive to changes in the level of service (i.e., if service is added or more vehicles are operated, then costs associated with propulsion and materials/supplies/contracted service increase accordingly.) Total Cars represent the total number of the vehicles in the fleet. This operating statistic is used as an input in calculating vehicle maintenance labor costs (i.e., technicians and mechanics, etc.) because the numbers of staff need to maintain vehicles are directly related to the number of vehicles in the fleet. It is also used for calculating Warranty and Parts labor costs, Maintenance Facility costs, General Administration costs, and Revenue Collection costs because it is assumed that as the fleet grows in size then the costs associated with these items increase accordingly. Route Miles represent the total distance of the alignment between terminal stations. Similar to total cars, this operating statistic is used as an input in calculating track maintenance labor and materials and supplies costs because the numbers of staff need to maintain trackage are directly related to the length of the alignment. It is assumed for the light rail alternative that station maintenance would be performed by private companies under contract to Triangle Transit or the operator of the LRT service. This arrangement follows the structure used by CATS for its light rail system. For the purposes of the O&M model, station maintenance costs reflect the associated costs of materials, supplies and contracted services. Annual Revenue Car Hours represents the number of hours a vehicle travels during one year in revenue service. This operating statistic is used as an input in calculating insurance costs because it represents the time that vehicles are in operation and at risk for accidents. Units of service were calculated based on the operating assumptions proposed for light rail service. The following table lists the units of service used as input into the O&M cost model. Table 2 4: Units of Service for LRT Scenario 1 Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 32,242 Total Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 38,408 Total Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 840,807 Total Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 1,037,457 Total Number of Cars in Fleet (inc. spare vehicles) 15 Route Miles 17.1 Stations 17 Annual Revenue Train Hours represent the total number of hours during one year in which trains operate during revenue service (i.e., the time in which the vehicles are available for travel by the general public). The number of train hours is closely related to operations labor costs since it is a function of the amount of time the vehicle is in operation. This operating statistic is also used as an input in estimating transit security and safety costs as security needs to be provided while the trains are in operation. Annual Revenue Car Miles represents the mileage vehicles travel during one year in revenue service. Car miles are used in estimating propulsion costs and materials/supplies/contracted services costs because these costs are Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-3

67 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 5: Units of Service for LRT Scenario 2 Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 32,242 Total Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 35,158 Total Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 840,807 Total Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 840,807 Total Number of Cars in Fleet (inc. spare vehicles) 10 Route Miles 17.1 Stations Productivity Ratios and Unit Costs Productivity ratios describe how labor varies with service levels. A productivity ratio represents the number of a particular resource needed to provide one unit of service (e.g., the number of mechanics per revenue car mile). Unit costs represent labor wages and benefits as well costs of materials. Productivity ratios and unit costs for this study were developed based data previously used to calculate O&M cost estimates for the CATS Lynx Blue Line Extension Study in The unit costs were inflated by two percent to account for general rise in costs of services and goods between 2008 and 2011 dollars. The Consumer Price Index was used as the source for this inflation rate. Unit costs in the O&M cost model represent the various costs associated with a light rail system. These include: vehicle operations labor costs; vehicle maintenance (labor, supplies, and materials) and power consumption costs; maintenance of way (labor, supplies, and materials) costs; warranty and parts labor costs; station maintenance materials, supplies and services; light rail maintenance facility costs; casualty and insurance, general administration and revenue collection costs; and transit safety and security labor, administrative and insurance costs associated with the enforcement of safety and security on vehicles and at park and ride lots, and transit facilities O&M Cost Model and Results A spreadsheet based O&M cost model was developed to estimate annual costs by cost item. The O&M cost model calculates costs using the following equations: Annual O&M expense (for labor costs) = (unit of service) * (productivity ratio) * (unit cost) Annual O&M expense (for non labor costs) = (unit of service) * (unit cost) Based on the service plans defined for the Durham Orange County light rail, the annual O&M cost for LRT Scenario 1 is 15,249,628 in 2011 dollars. For LRT Scenario 2, the annual O&M cost is 14,070,779. The costs for LRT Scenario 1 are presented in Table 2 6 and in Table 2 7 for LRT Scenario 2. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-4

68 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 6: LRT Scenario 1 Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Durham-Orange County Corridor - Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost 1 FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Rail Operators 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours L Employees/Rev. Train Hr 70,546 /Employee 27 1,904,753 Rail Operations Supervisors 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours L Employees/Rev. Train Hr 81,402 /Employee 16 1,302,427 Subtotal 3,207,180 Vehicle Maintenance and Power Consumption Traction Power 1,037,457 Annual Revenue Car Miles U /Rev. Car Mile 950,075 Rail Car Electro Mechanics 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 77,276 /Employee 15 1,159,136 Rail Car Servicers - Veh. Maint. & Power Consumption 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 48,280 /Employee 5 241,398 Rail Shop Machinists 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 77,276 /Employee 2 154,551 Rail Car Maintenance Supervisors 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 95,674 /Employee 4 382,697 Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 2 1,037,457 Annual Revenue Car Miles M /Rev. Car Mile 472,350 Subtotal 3,360,208 Maintenance of Way (MOW) MOW Technicians Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 77,276 /Employee 20 1,545,514 Rail MOW Supervisors 17.1 Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 95,674 /Employee 9 861,069 Track Maintainers 17.1 Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 50,265 /Employee 4 201,060 Track Laborers 17.1 Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 31,673 /Employee 4 126,690 Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services Route Miles M - 30,000 /Rte Mile 513,000 Subtotal 3,247,333 Warranty & Parts Warranty & Parts Manager 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 85,097 /Employee 1 85,097 Warranty & Parts Specialist 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 81,865 /Employee 1 81,865 Stores Clerk 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 48,839 /Employee 2 97,677 Receiving Clerk 15 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 52,756 /Employee 1 52,756 Subtotal 317,395 Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 5,6 17 Stations M - 51,500 /Station 875,500 Light Rail Maintenance Facility 7 15 Total number of cars in fleet M - 21,693 /Car 325,399 Subtotal 1,200,899 General Administration General Administration 15 Total number of cars in fleet - 26,673 /Car 400,092 Subtotal 400,092 Other Casualty and Insurance 8 38,408 Annual Revenue Car Hours /Rev. Car Hr 1,299,377 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 9 17 Stations L - 12,167 /Station 206,841 Revenue Collection General Administration 17 Stations - 8,165 /Station 138,809 Subtotal 1,645,028 Transit Security and Safety 10 Salary and Fringe 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 366,381 General Administration 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours /Rev. Train Hr 1,488,173 Insurance 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours /Rev. Train Hr 16,939 Subtotal 1,871,493 Grand Total 15,249,628 L = Labor M = Material U=Utilities Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-5

69 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 7: LRT Scenario 2 Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost 1 FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Rail Operators 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours L Employees/Rev. Train Hr 70,546 /Employee 27 1,904,753 Rail Operations Supervisors 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours L Employees/Rev. Train Hr 81,402 /Employee 16 1,275,311 Subtotal 3,180,064 Vehicle Maintenance and Power Consumption Traction Power 840,807 Annual Revenue Car Miles U /Rev. Car Mile 769,988 Rail Car Electro Mechanics 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 77,276 /Employee ,757 Rail Car Servicers - Veh. Maint. & Power Consumption 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 48,280 /Employee 4 193,119 Rail Shop Machinists 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 77,276 /Employee 2 154,551 Rail Car Maintenance Supervisors 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 95,674 /Employee 3 287,023 Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 2 840,807 Annual Revenue Car Miles M /Rev. Car Mile 382,816 Subtotal 2,560,254 Maintenance of Way (MOW) MOW Technicians Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 77,276 /Employee 20 1,545,514 Rail MOW Supervisors 17.1 Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 95,674 /Employee 9 861,069 Track Maintainers 17.1 Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 50,265 /Employee 4 201,060 Track Laborers 17.1 Route Miles L Employees / Rte Mile 31,673 /Employee 4 126,690 Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services Route Miles M - 30,000 /Rte Mile 513,000 Subtotal 3,247,333 Warranty & Parts Warranty & Parts Manager 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 85,097 /Employee 1 85,097 Warranty & Parts Specialist 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 81,865 /Employee 1 81,865 Stores Clerk 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 48,839 /Employee 2 97,677 Receiving Clerk 10 Total number of cars in fleet L Employees/Total cars 52,756 /Employee 1 52,756 Subtotal 317,395 Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 5,6 17 Stations M - 51,500 /Station 875,500 Light Rail Maintenance Facility 7 10 Total number of cars in fleet M - 21,693 /Car 216,933 Subtotal 1,092,433 General Administration General Administration 10 Total number of cars in fleet - 26,673 /Car 266,728 Subtotal 266,728 Other Casualty and Insurance 8 35,158 Annual Revenue Car Hours /Rev. Car Hr 1,189,428 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 9 17 Stations L - 12,167 /Station 206,841 Revenue Collection General Administration 17 Stations - 8,165 /Station 138,809 Subtotal 1,535,078 Transit Security and Safety 10 Salary and Fringe 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 366,381 General Administration 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours /Rev. Train Hr 1,488,173 Insurance 32,242 Annual Revenue Train Hours /Rev. Train Hr 16,939 Subtotal 1,871,493 Grand Total 14,070,779 L = Labor M = Material U=Utilities Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-6

70 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Footnotes: 1 All unit costs per employee reflect FY2008 market rate salaries plus a fringe factor of 0.52 for Non Exempt positions and 0.44 for Exempt positions. All unit costs have been inflated by 3 percent to FY2011 dollars. 2 Materials and Supplies includes budget item costs for Wrecker Service Rental, Utilities, Shop Maintenance and Repair equipment, haz mat disposal, cleaning supplies, tools and uniforms/protective clothing for both vehicle and track maintenance staff. 3 MOW technicians include electronic technicians, train control technicians, traction power technicians as these positions appear in the CATS LRT org chart. 4 Materials and Supplies includes CATS Light Rail Department budget item costs for Emergency Repairs (standby contract for repair of OCS and track, time and material for actual repairs to OCS and track, track grinding (post revenue), track (realignment geometry check), materials (crossing gates, mast assemblies, lighting assemblies); ROW materials (ballast, ties, rails, asphalt, substation breakers, surplus track material), Traction Power, Train Control (ATP Equipment LRV and Wayside), Track, Systems, and additional parts. 5 Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services include costs associated with graffiti removal, Miscellaneous HVAC, utilities (water and electricity costs), contracted services (landscape management) costs, janitorial services at the Charlotte Transit Center, Miscellaneous. Repairs/Services (Shelters and Stops), and Miscellaneous supplies (Shelters and Stops), as shown in CATS Facilities Department line item budget. 6 Per direction of CATS Facilities Department, the annual cost per station is assumed to be 50,000/year. This cost is an average annualized cost and includes utilities (water and electric) landscaping and surface maintenance. This cost does not include salary and fringe. 7 Light Rail Maintenance Facility includes costs associated with pest control, fire and safety, Tarheel Sweeping, window cleaning, janitorial services, waste Services, textile services, Duke Power, Piedmont Natural Gas, water utilities, vehicle fuel, Miscellaneous Repairs/Services (Shelters and Stops), Miscellaneous supplies (Shelters and Stops), Building services Material and Supplies, and Landscape Management Contracts 8 Casualty and insurance includes costs for insurance premiums, insurance administration, and worker's compensation. 9 Revenue collection costs were derived from a separate cost center in the CATS FY08 Line Item Budget and represents costs associated with revenue collection on the transit system, including maintenance and servicing of ticket vending machines. Per direction of CATS, the total Revenue Collection unit costs have been multiplied by 55% to represent the share of revenue collection costs applicable only to rail operations. 10 Transit Security and Safety costs were derived from a separate cost center in the CATS FY08 Line Item Budget and represents costs associated with providing security on the transit system. Per direction of CATS, the total Transit Security and Safety unit costs have been multiplied by 40% to represent the share of security and safety costs applicable only to rail operations. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-7

71 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Appendix A: Operating Statistics Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 1 Operating Statistics Durham-Orange County Corridor - D-O Alternative Woodmont and South Square East & A-3 (Scenario 1-1,500 Passenger Capacity) Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles Average Operating Speed (mph) 29.6 mph End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 35 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 5 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 80 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off-peak (minutes) 80 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 10 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 20 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency (broken out by Saturday and Sunday, if necessary) 20 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated (i.e., is the service operated 365 days per year? If not, specify) 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6:00AM-9AM) 3hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5hours Number of Peak Trains Required 8 peak trains Number of Off-Peak Trains Required 4 off peak trains Number of Peak Vehicles Required 12 cars Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3spare cars Total Fleet Size 15 cars Train and car assignments. AM and PM Peak periods only. Trains 1, 2, 5 and 6 are 1 car trainsets (i.e., one vehicle per train) = 4 vehicles Train and car assignments. AM and PM Peak periods only. Trains 3, 4, 7 and 8 are 2 car trainsets (i.e., two vehicles per train) = 8 vehicles Number of Cars per Train-Set for Peak Service? 1 and 2 cars per trainset (peak period service) Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service? 1 car per trainset (off peak period service) Total Number of Stations 17 stations Total Weekday Revenue Train Hours (Daily) 96.0 Total Weekday Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 24,000 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Train Hours (Daily) 71.7 Total Weekend Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 8,242 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 32,242 Total Weekday Revenue Car Hours (Daily) Total Weekday Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 30,167 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Car Hours (Daily) 71.7 Total Weekend Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 8,242 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 38,408 Total Weekday Revenue Train Miles (Daily) 2,514 Total Weekday Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 628,425 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Train Miles (Daily) 1,847 Total Weekend Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 212,382 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 840,807 Total Weekday Revenue Car Miles (Daily) 3,300 Total Weekday Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 825,075 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Car Miles (Daily) 1,847 Total Weekend Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 212,382 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 1,037,457 Bold indicates direct input into O&M Model. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-8

72 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-9

73 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekends/Holidays Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-10

74 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Train and Car Miles Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Train and Car Miles Weekday Durham Orange County Corridor (Scenario 1 1,500 Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Train Car Cars per Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Miles Train set Peak AM (6:00 8:59 AM) and 2 Off Peak 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) Peak PM (3:30 6:59 PM) , and 2 Off Peak 2 (7 12 AM) Total Weekday Train/Car Miles 2, , Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Train/Car Miles 628, , Assumptions: Peak Headway = Every 10 minutes Off Peak Headway = Every 20 minutes Alignment length = 17.1 miles one way Weekend/Holiday Durham Orange County Corridor (Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Train Car Cars per Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Miles Train set Off Peak 1 (6 AM 12 AM) , , Total Weekend Train/Car Miles 1, , Annualization Factor Annual Weekend Train/Car Miles 212, , Assumptions: Off Peak Headway = Every 20 minutes Alignment length = 17.1 miles one way Annual Train/Car Miles (Total) 840, ,037, Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-11

75 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 2 Operating Statistics Durham-Orange County Corridor - D-O Alternative Woodmont and South Square East & A-3 (Scenario Passenger Capacity) Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles Average Operating Speed (mph) 29.6 mph End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 35 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 5 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 80 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off-peak (minutes) 80 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 10 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 20 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency (broken out by Saturday and Sunday, if necessary) 20 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated (i.e., is the service operated 365 days per year? If not, specify) 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6:00AM-9AM) 3hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5hours Number of Peak Trains Required 8 peak trains Number of Off-Peak Trains Required 4 off peak trains Number of Peak Vehicles Required 8cars Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 2spare cars Total Fleet Size 10 cars Train and car assignments. AM and PM Peak periods only. Trains 1-8 are 1 car trainsets Number of Cars per Train-Set for Peak Service? 1 car per trainset (peak period service) Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service? 1 car per trainset (off peak period service) Total Number of Stations 17 stations Total Weekday Revenue Train Hours (Daily) 96.0 Total Weekday Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 24,000 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Train Hours (Daily) 71.7 Total Weekend Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 8,242 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Train Hours (Annual) 32,242 Total Weekday Revenue Car Hours (Daily) Total Weekday Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 26,917 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Car Hours (Daily) 71.7 Total Weekend Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 8,242 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Car Hours (Annual) 35,158 Total Weekday Revenue Train Miles (Daily) 2,514 Total Weekday Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 628,425 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Train Miles (Daily) 1,847 Total Weekend Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 212,382 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Train Miles (Annual) 840,807 Total Weekday Revenue Car Miles (Daily) 2,514 Total Weekday Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 628,425 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Car Miles (Daily) 1,847 Total Weekend Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 212,382 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Car Miles (Annual) 840,807 Bold indicates direct input into O&M Model. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-12

76 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 2 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-13

77 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 2 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekends/Holidays Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-14

78 Light Rail Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario 2 Annual Revenue Train and Car Miles Durham Orange County Corridor LRT Scenario2 Annual Revenue Train and Car Miles Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-LRT-15

79 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates VOLUME 3 SECTION B BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATES DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Prepared for TRIANGLE TRANSIT Prepared by URS TEAM July 2011 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-i

80 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY COST CATEGORIES BRT OPERATING SCENARIOS BRT SERVICE PLANS O&M COST ITEMS AND UNITS OF SERVICE PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS AND UNIT COSTS O&M COST MODEL AND RESULTS... 5 APPENDIX A: OPERATING STATISTICS LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2 1: O&M COST CATEGORIES AND ASSOCIATED COST ITEMS... 2 TABLE 2 2: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE PLAN FOR BRT HIGH SCENARIO TABLE 2 3: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE PLAN FOR BRT HIGH SCENARIO TABLE 2 4: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE PLAN FOR BRT LOW SCENARIO TABLE 2 5: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE PLAN FOR BRT LOW SCENARIO TABLE 2 6: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR BRT HIGH SCENARIO 1 (1,500 PASSENGER PEAK HOUR CAPACITY)... 5 TABLE 2 7: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR BRT HIGH SCENARIO 2 (800 PASSENGER PEAK HOUR CAPACITY)... 5 TABLE 2 8: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR BRT LOW SCENARIO 3 (1,500 PASSENGER PEAK HOUR CAPACITY)... 5 TABLE 2 9: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR BRT LOW SCENARIO 4 (800 PASSENGER PEAK HOUR CAPACITY)... 5 TABLE 2 10: BRT HIGH SCENARIO 1 ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 6 TABLE 2 11: BRT HIGH SCENARIO 2 ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 7 TABLE 2 12: BRT LOW SCENARIO 3 ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 8 TABLE 2 13: BRT LOW SCENARIO 4 ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 9 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT--ii

81 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates 1. Introduction This report documents the operating and maintenance (O&M) cost methodology, assumptions, and estimates for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) alternative for the Durham Orange Corridor as part of the Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis study. 2. Methodology The introduction of new BRT service will result in annual operating and maintenance costs. The costs of providing BRT service will occur in terms of the following functions: Vehicle operations; Vehicle maintenance and fuel; Maintenance of way; Maintenance of stations; General Administration Other costs; and Transit Security and Safety. To estimate the operations and maintenance costs associated with an introduction of BRT, a cost allocation operating and maintenance model was developed to calculate the costs associated with this new service. A cost allocation model assumes that the expenses incurred in providing transit service are driven by key service variables such as annual revenue vehicle hours, total vehicles, annual revenue vehicle miles, route miles, and stations. For each expense line item, service variables are multiplied by unit costs and productivity ratios (for labor expenses) to calculate the costs for each expense line item. For the purposes of developing these cost estimates, Triangle Transit s Actual 2010 Bus Operations budget was used as a basis for cost items related to vehicle operations, vehicle maintenance, general administration, and casualty and insurance. It is assumed that a BRT system would have similar needs and cost structure as the existing bus system in the Triangle Region in terms of salaries for operators and mechanics, costs of materials, etc. However, for certain cost categories, where the BRT would be more analogous to light rail, such as in terms of stations, revenue collection, and transit security, it was assumed that O&M costs for the BRT alternative would be comparable to the LRT alternative; therefore the same unit costs for these categories were used in the BRT O&M cost model. The annual O&M unit cost for dedicated BRT running way is based on an assumption of 10,000 per lane mile per year (this is the national average O&M cost for arterial streets according to TCRP Report 118 Bus Rapid Transit Practitioners Guide). The following sections describe the components used to develop the O&M cost model and results Cost Categories The cost categories for the O&M cost model that were used to estimate the operating and maintenance costs for the BRT alternatives include: Vehicle Operations: Annual costs associated with vehicle operations such as operator wages, materials and supplies (i.e., uniforms, licenses, tags and fees), and "Other" expenses representing costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs; Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel: Annual costs associated with fuel as well as costs related to vehicle maintenance such as wages for mechanics, service attendants, parts & inventory coordinator and assistants, vehicle maintenance materials and supplies (i.e., spare parts, lubricants, tools, cleaning supplies, service and maintenance contracts, uniforms/protective clothing, maintenance staff, etc.), and "Other" expenses representing costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs; Maintenance of Way: Annual costs associated with the maintenance of the dedicated running way for BRT; Maintenance of Stations: Annual costs associated with station maintenance, such as graffiti removal, station utilities (electricity and water), repairs, and materials for stations. General Administration: Costs associated with vehicle supervision (i.e., salaries for Road Supervisors, Dispatchers, and Maintenance Supervisors) and administrative costs related to Human Resources, Finance, Administrative Services, EEO, and "Other" expenses representing costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs; Other Costs: Costs associated with casualty and insurance, and revenue collection including the maintenance and servicing of ticket vending machines at stations. Transit Security and Safety: Annual Costs associated with the enforcement of safety and security on vehicles and at park and ride lots, transit facilities, and garages. The first step in developing the O&M cost model was to develop cost categories and to assign associated cost items as shown in Table 2 1. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-1

82 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 1: O&M Cost Categories and Associated Cost Items Cost category Cost item Vehicle Operations Operators Materials and Supplies Other Costs Vehicle Maintenance and Power Consumption Fuel and Lubricants Mechanics Service Attendants Parts & Inventory Coordinator Parts & Inventory Assistant Materials and Supplies Other Costs Maintenance-of-Way Dedicated BRT Running Way Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe Materials and Supplies Other Costs Casualty and Insurance Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe6 Revenue Collection General Administration Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe General Administration Insurance BRT Operating Scenarios Four BRT operating scenarios were developed based on higher and lower capital cost configurations and based on higher and lower peak hour passenger capacities. These variations provide an understanding of the differences in scale of O&M costs related to operating a BRT service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 1,500 passengers and service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 800 passengers, as well as to provide the ability to compare the costs of operating BRT versus LRT in this corridor. The four BRT operating scenarios are: BRT High Scenario 1: BRT service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 1,500 passengers with high level of capital improvements. BRT High Scenario 2: BRT service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 800 passengers with a higher level of capital improvements. BRT Low Scenario 3: BRT service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 1,500 passengers with lower level of capital improvements. 15 BRT vehicles per hour during the peak period * 100 passenger per BRT vehicle = 1,500 passengers Similarly, for BRT High Scenario 2, to achieve a peak hour passenger capacity of 800 passengers it was calculated that a fleet of 8 BRT vehicles per hour would be needed. To provide service for the entire peak period, a total of 12 BRT vehicles would be needed (not including spares). This is based on the following operating parameters: 7.5 minute peak headways Each BRT vehicle was assumed to have a total passenger capacity of 100 passengers. 8 BRT vehicles per hour during the peak period * 100 passenger per BRT = 800 passengers Service plans, operating statistics, and O&M cost estimates for BRT Scenarios 1 and 2 were prepared and are presented in the following sections. For BRT Low Scenarios 3 and 4, the peak hour passenger capacities, headways, vehicle capacities, are the same as their counterparts in Scenarios 1 and 2. The differences in the BRT High and Low Scenarios are alignment length, number of stations, one way run time, and fleet requirements. The BRT Low Scenarios feature one additional station (18 stations vs. 17 stations) and a slightly longer alignment (17.7 miles vs miles). The one way run time for the BRT Low Scenarios are six minutes longer than the BRT High Scenario, and the cycle times and fleet size requirements are higher under the BRT Low Scenario BRT Service Plans A service plan defining the operation of the Durham Orange County Corridor BRT was created and used in the calculation of units of service which were inputted into the O&M cost model. Table 2 2 lists the operating assumptions for BRT High Scenario 1, Table 2 3 lists the assumptions for BRT High Scenario 2, Tables 2 4 and 2 5 present the operating assumptions for the BRT Low Scenarios. NOTE: For all BRT alternatives, the ridership modeling was based on 10 minute peak and 20 minute off peak service in order to have similar comparison or service between LRT and BRT. The peak / off peak headways in this report are reflective of providing an even flow of service for the 1,500 passengers per hour and 800 passengers per hour service. These capacities reflect a higher volume of passengers than the results in the ridership model. It was decided, for customer service reasons, that 10 minute headway for LRT was considered the minimum and this level of service equates to 800 passengers per hour. It was also requested that a service of alternating one and two car trains for LRT be investigated and this represents the 1,500 passengers per hour level of service. BRT High Scenario 4: BRT service with a peak hour passenger capacity of 800 passengers with a lower level of capital improvements. For BRT High Scenario 1, to achieve a peak hour passenger capacity of 1,500 passengers it was calculated that a fleet of 15 BRT vehicles per hour would be needed. To provide service for the entire peak period, a total of 22 BRT vehicles would be needed (not including spares). The 1,500 passenger capacity per peak hour is based on the following operating parameters: 4 minute peak headways Each BRT vehicle was assumed to have a total passenger capacity of 100 passengers. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-2

83 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 2: Durham Orange County Service Plan for BRT High Scenario 1 (1,500 passenger peak hour capacity) Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 38 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 7 and 5 minutes Round Trip Cycle time (minutes) 88 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 4 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM-9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 22 peak vehicles Number of Off-Peak Vehicles Required 5 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 5 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 27 Vehicles Total Number of Stations 17 stations Table 2 3: Durham Orange County Service Plan for BRT High Scenario 2 (800 passenger peak hour capacity) Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 38 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 7 minutes Round Trip Cycle time (minutes) 90 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 7.5 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM-9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 12 peak vehicles Number of Off-Peak Vehicles Required 8 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 15 vehicles Total Number of Stations 17 stations Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-3

84 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 4: Durham Orange County Service Plan for BRT Low Scenario 3 (1,500 passenger peak hour capacity) Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) 17.7 route miles End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 44 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 5 and 3 minutes Round Trip Cycle time (minutes) 96 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 4 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM-9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 24 peak vehicles Number of Off-Peak Vehicles Required 8 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 5 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 29 vehicles Total Number of Stations 18 stations Table 2 5: Durham Orange County Service Plan for BRT Low Scenario 4 (800 passenger peak hour capacity) Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) 17.7 route miles End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 44 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 8 and 9 minutes Round Trip Cycle time (minutes) 105 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 7.5 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM-9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 14 peak vehicles Number of Off-Peak Vehicles Required 8 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 17 vehicles Total Number of Stations 18 stations O&M Cost Items and Units of Service Next, for each of the O&M cost items, a unit of service (i.e., service variable) was calculated and assigned as shown in Tables 2 6 through 2 9. Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours represent the total number of hours during one year in which vehicles operate during revenue service (i.e., the time in which the vehicles are available for travel by the general public). The number of vehicle hours is closely related to operations labor costs since it is a function of the amount of time the vehicle is in operation. This operating statistic is also used as an input in estimating transit security and safety as security needs to be provided while the vehicles are in operation. In addition, it is used as an input in calculating insurance costs because it represents the time that vehicles are in operation and at risk for accidents. Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles represents the mileage vehicles travel during one year in revenue service. Vehicle miles are used in estimating fuel costs, vehicle maintenance materials and supplies, and indirect vehicle maintenance costs because they are sensitive to changes in the level of service (i.e., if service is added or more vehicles are operated, then costs associated with propulsion, materials and supplies, and indirect and indirect vehicle maintenance needs increase accordingly.) and inventory staff, etc.) because the numbers of staff needed to maintain vehicles are directly related to the number of vehicles in the fleet. It is also used for calculating Supervision costs and General Administration costs because it is assumed that as the fleet grows in size then the costs associated with these items increase accordingly. Route Miles represent the total distance of the alignment between terminal stations. Similar to total cars, this operating statistic is used as an input in calculating maintenance of way costs because this cost is directly related to the length of the alignment. Similar to the light rail alternative, for the BRT alternative, it is assumed that station maintenance would be performed by private companies under contract to Triangle Transit or the operator of the BRT service. This arrangement follows the structure used by CATS for its light rail system. For the purposes of the O&M model, station maintenance costs reflect the associated costs of materials, supplies and contracted services. Total vehicles represent the total number of the vehicles in the fleet, including spare vehicles. This operating statistic is used as an input in calculating vehicle maintenance labor costs (i.e., mechanics, service attendants, parts Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-4

85 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates The following tables list the units of service used as input into the O&M cost model. Table 2 6: Units of Service for BRT High Scenario 1 (1,500 passenger peak hour capacity) Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 72,682 Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,679,220 Total Number of Vehicles in Fleet (including spare 27 vehicles) Route Miles 17.1 Stations 17 Table 2 9: Units of Service for BRT Low Scenario 4 (800 passenger peak hour capacity) Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 60,786 Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,335,465 Total Number of Vehicles in Fleet (including spare 17 vehicles) Route Miles 17.7 Stations 18 Table 2 7: Units of Service for BRT High Scenario 2 (800 passenger peak hour capacity) Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 57,544 Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,290,195 Total Number of Vehicles in Fleet (including spare 15 vehicles) Route Miles 17.1 Stations 17 Table 2 8: Units of Service for BRT Low Scenario 3 (1,500 passenger peak hour capacity) Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 73,447 Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,738,140 Total Number of Vehicles in Fleet (including spare 29 vehicles) Route Miles 17.7 Stations Productivity Ratios and Unit Costs Productivity ratios describe how labor varies with service levels. A productivity ratio represents the number of a particular resource needed to provide one unit of service (e.g., the number of mechanics per revenue vehicle mile). Unit costs represent labor wages and benefits as well costs of materials. Productivity ratios and unit costs for the BRT were developed based on the Actual 2010 Budget, staffing levels, and salary data for Triangle Transit bus operations. The unit costs were inflated by one percent to account for general rise in costs of services and goods between 2010 and 2011 dollars. The Consumer Price Index was used as the source for this inflation rate. Unit costs in the O&M cost model represent the various costs associated with a BRT system. These include: vehicle operations labor, materials, supplies, and indirect or other costs; vehicle maintenance labor, materials, supplies, and other costs and fuel costs; maintenance of way costs; station maintenance materials, supplies and services; general administration and supervision costs; casualty/insurance and revenue collection costs; and transit safety and security labor, administrative and insurance costs associated with the enforcement of safety and security on vehicles and at park and ride lots, and transit facilities O&M Cost Model and Results A spreadsheet based O&M cost model was developed to estimate annual costs by cost item. The O&M cost model calculates costs using the following equations: Annual O&M expense (for labor costs) = (unit of service) * (productivity ratio) * (unit cost) Annual O&M expense (for non labor costs) = (unit of service) * (unit cost) Based on the service plans defined for the Durham Orange County BRT, the annual O&M costs for BRT High Scenario 1 is 13,153,006 in 2011 dollars. For BRT High Scenario 2, the annual O&M cost is 10,529,833. BRT Low Scenario 3 has an annual O&M cost of 13,375,544 and the annual O&M cost for BRT Low Scenario 4 is 10,923,691. The BRT Low Scenarios provide savings in capital costs, however, the additional station and longer alignment result in higher station related and vehicle maintenance related O&M costs. The costs for BRT Scenarios are presented in Tables 2 10 though Table Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-5

86 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 10: BRT High Scenario 1 Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Operators 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L Employees/Rev. Veh. Hr 47,168 /Employee ,584,738 Materials and Supplies 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours M /Revenue Vehicle Hour 79,163 Other Costs 2 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Revenue Vehicle Hour 643,277 Subtotal 4,307,179 Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel Fuel and Lubricants 1,679,220 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 993, Mechanics 27 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 62,853 /Employee 5 314,266 Service Attendants 27 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 42,414 /Employee 3 127,242 Parts & Inventory Coordinator 27 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 66,477 /Employee 1 66,477 Parts & Inventory Assistant 27 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 49,100 /Employee 1 49,100 Materials and Supplies 1,679,220 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 434,795 Other Costs 1,679,220 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles 0.25 /Rev. Veh. Mile 422,130 Subtotal 2,407,348 Maintenance of Way (MOW) Dedicated BRT Running Way 17.1 Route Miles 10,100 /Route Mile 3 172,710 Subtotal 172,710 Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 4 17 Stations M - 51,510 /Station 875,670 Subtotal 875,670 General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe 5 27 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 8,318 /Vehicle 224, Materials and Supplies 27 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 2,758 /Vehicle 74, Subtotal 299,069 Other Casualty and Insurance 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Veh. Mile 525,629 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 6 17 Stations L - 12,169 /Station 206, Revenue Collection General Administration 17 Stations - 8,167 /Station 138, Subtotal 871,347 Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 826,086 General Administration 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 3,355,406 Insurance 72,682 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 38,192 Subtotal 4,219,684 Grand Total 13,153,006 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-6

87 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 11: BRT High Scenario 2 Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Operators 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L Employees/Rev. Veh. Hr 47,168 /Employee ,830,057 Materials and Supplies 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours M /Revenue Vehicle Hour 62,675 Other Costs 2 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Revenue Vehicle Hour 509,298 Subtotal 3,402,030 Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel Fuel and Lubricants 1,290,195 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 763, Mechanics 15 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 62,853 /Employee 3 188,559 Service Attendants 15 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 42,414 /Employee 2 84,828 Parts & Inventory Coordinator 15 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 66,477 /Employee 1 66,477 Parts & Inventory Assistant 15 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 49,100 /Employee 1 49,100 Materials and Supplies 1,290,195 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 334,066 Other Costs 1,290,195 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles 0.25 /Rev. Veh. Mile 324,335 Subtotal 1,810,577 Maintenance of Way (MOW) Dedicated BRT Running Way 17.1 Route Miles 10,100 /Route Mile 3 172,710 Subtotal 172,710 Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 4 17 Stations M - 51,510 /Station 875,670 Subtotal 875,670 General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe 5 15 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 8,318 /Vehicle 124, Materials and Supplies 15 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 2,758 /Vehicle 41, Subtotal 166,149 Other Casualty and Insurance 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Veh. Mile 416,154 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 6 17 Stations L - 12,169 /Station 206, Revenue Collection General Administration 17 Stations - 8,167 /Station 138, Subtotal 761,871 Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 654,032 General Administration 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 2,656,556 Insurance 57,544 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 30,238 Subtotal 3,340,826 Grand Total 10,529,833 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-7

88 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 12: BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Operators 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L Employees/Rev. Veh. Hr 47,168 /Employee ,584,738 Materials and Supplies 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours M /Revenue Vehicle Hour 79,996 Other Costs 2 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Revenue Vehicle Hour 650,049 Subtotal 4,314,783 Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel Fuel and Lubricants 1,738,140 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 1,028, Mechanics 29 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 62,853 /Employee 5 314,266 Service Attendants 29 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 42,414 /Employee 3 127,242 Parts & Inventory Coordinator 29 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 66,477 /Employee 1 66,477 Parts & Inventory Assistant 29 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 49,100 /Employee 1 49,100 Materials and Supplies 1,738,140 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 450,051 Other Costs 1,738,140 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles 0.25 /Rev. Veh. Mile 436,941 Subtotal 2,472,270 Maintenance of Way (MOW) Dedicated BRT Running Way 17.7 Route Miles 10,100 /Route Mile 3 178,770 Subtotal 178,770 Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 4 18 Stations M - 51,510 /Station 927,180 Subtotal 927,180 General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe 5 29 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 8,318 /Vehicle 241, Materials and Supplies 29 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 2,758 /Vehicle 79, Subtotal 321,222 Other Casualty and Insurance 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Veh. Mile 531,163 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 6 18 Stations L - 12,169 /Station 219, Revenue Collection General Administration 18 Stations - 8,167 /Station 147, Subtotal 897,217 Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 834,782 General Administration 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 3,390,727 Insurance 73,447 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 38,594 Subtotal 4,264,102 Grand Total 13,375,544 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-8

89 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 13: BRT Low Scenario 4 Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Operators 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L Employees/Rev. Veh. Hr 47,168 /Employee ,830,057 Materials and Supplies 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours M /Revenue Vehicle Hour 66,207 Other Costs 2 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Revenue Vehicle Hour 537,995 Subtotal 3,434,258 Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel Fuel and Lubricants 1,335,465 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 789, Mechanics 17 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 62,853 /Employee 3 188,559 Service Attendants 17 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 42,414 /Employee 2 84,828 Parts & Inventory Coordinator 17 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 66,477 /Employee 1 66,477 Parts & Inventory Assistant 17 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 49,100 /Employee 1 49,100 Materials and Supplies 1,335,465 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 345,788 Other Costs 1,335,465 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles 0.25 /Rev. Veh. Mile 335,715 Subtotal 1,860,458 Maintenance of Way (MOW) Dedicated BRT Running Way 17.7 Route Miles 10,100 /Route Mile 3 178,770 Subtotal 178,770 Station Maintenance Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 4 18 Stations M - 51,510 /Station 927,180 Subtotal 927,180 General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe 5 17 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 8,318 /Vehicle 141, Materials and Supplies 17 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 2,758 /Vehicle 46, Subtotal 188,303 Other Casualty and Insurance 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Veh. Mile 439,602 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 6 18 Stations L - 12,169 /Station 219, Revenue Collection General Administration 18 Stations - 8,167 /Station 147, Subtotal 805,656 Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 690,884 General Administration 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 2,806,241 Insurance 60,786 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 31,941 Subtotal 3,529,066 Grand Total 10,923,691 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-9

90 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Footnotes: 1 All salaries per employee shown are average annual salaries for that position and pay grades, and include fringe benefits. 2 All "Other" costs represent costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs. 3 Dedicated BRT running way unit cost is based on 10,000 per lane mile per year (based on national average O&M costs for arterial streets according to TCRP Report 118 Bus Rapid Transit Practitioners Guide). 4 It is assumed that station maintenance costs for BRT alternative would be comparable to the LRT alternative; therefore the same unit costs were used. Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services includes costs associated with graffiti removal, Miscellaneous HVAC, utilities (water and electricity costs), contracted services (landscape management) costs, janitorial services, Miscellaneous Repairs/Services (Shelters and Stops), and Miscellaneous supplies (Shelters and Stops). 5 Includes salaries for Vehicle Supervision including: Road Supervisors, Dispatchers, and Maintenance Supervisors. 6 It assumed that revenue collection costs for BRT alternative would be comparable to the LRT alternative; therefore the same unit costs were used. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-10

91 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Appendix A: Operating Statistics Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles End to End One Way Run Time (minutes) 38 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 7 and 5 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 88 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off peak (minutes) 96 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 4 minutes Off Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM 9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM 3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM 7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM 12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 22 peak vehicles Number of Off Peak Vehicles Required 5 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 5 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 27 vehicles Number of Cars per Train Set for Peak Service? N/A Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service? N/A Total Number of Stations 17 stations Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 56,275 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 16,407 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 72,682 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 5,301 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,325,250 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 3,078 Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 353,970 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,679,220 Bold indicates direct input into O&M Model. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-11

92 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekdays AM Peak D-O Corridor - BRT Alternative Scenario 1 - Weekdays Weekdays one way run time from one way run time end to end 0:38 min from end to end 0:38 min AM Peak Period (6:00 AM 8:59 AM) 3 hours AM Peak period Depart UNC Depart Arrive UNC Layover at UNC Hospitals Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals (min) Veh # begin end total hrs in service 1 6:00 AM 6:38 AM 7 2 6:05 AM 6:43 AM 5 1 6:00 AM 9:34 AM 3:34 3 6:04 AM 6:42 AM 7 4 6:09 AM 6:47 AM 5 2 6:05 AM 8:54 AM 2:49 5 6:08 AM 6:46 AM 7 6 6:13 AM 6:51 AM 5 3 6:04 AM 8:55 AM 2:51 7 6:12 AM 6:50 AM 7 8 6:17 AM 6:55 AM 5 4 6:09 AM 8:58 AM 2:49 9 6:16 AM 6:54 AM :21 AM 6:59 AM 5 5 6:08 AM 8:59 AM 2: :20 AM 6:58 AM :25 AM 7:03 AM 5 6 6:13 AM 9:02 AM 2: :24 AM 7:02 AM :29 AM 7:07 AM 5 7 6:12 AM 9:03 AM 2: :28 AM 7:06 AM :33 AM 7:11 AM 5 8 6:17 AM 9:06 AM 2: :32 AM 7:10 AM :37 AM 7:15 AM 5 9 6:16 AM 9:07 AM 2: :36 AM 7:14 AM 7 1 6:45 AM 7:23 AM :21 AM 9:10 AM 2: :40 AM 7:18 AM 7 3 6:49 AM 7:27 AM :20 AM 9:11 AM 2: :44 AM 7:22 AM 7 5 6:53 AM 7:31 AM :25 AM 9:14 AM 2:49 2 6:48 AM 7:26 AM 7 7 6:57 AM 7:35 AM :24 AM 9:15 AM 2:51 4 6:52 AM 7:30 AM 7 9 7:01 AM 7:39 AM :29 AM 9:18 AM 2:49 6 6:56 AM 7:34 AM :05 AM 7:43 AM :28 AM 9:19 AM 2:51 8 7:00 AM 7:38 AM :09 AM 7:47 AM :33 AM 9:22 AM 2: :04 AM 7:42 AM :13 AM 7:51 AM :32 AM 9:23 AM 2: :08 AM 7:46 AM :17 AM 7:55 AM :37 AM 9:26 AM 2: :12 AM 7:50 AM :21 AM 7:59 AM :36 AM 9:27 AM 2: :16 AM 7:54 AM :25 AM 8:03 AM :40 AM 9:31 AM 2: :20 AM 7:58 AM :29 AM 8:07 AM :44 AM 9:35 AM 2: :24 AM 8:02 AM 7 2 7:33 AM 8:11 AM :24 AM 9:30 AM 2:06 1 7:28 AM 8:06 AM 7 4 7:37 AM 8:15 AM 5 62:22:00 veh hrs during AM Peak 3 7:32 AM 8:10 AM 7 6 7:41 AM 8:19 AM 5 5 7:36 AM 8:14 AM 7 8 7:45 AM 8:23 AM 5 7 7:40 AM 8:18 AM :49 AM 8:27 AM 5 9 7:44 AM 8:22 AM :53 AM 8:31 AM :48 AM 8:26 AM :57 AM 8:35 AM :52 AM 8:30 AM :01 AM 8:39 AM :56 AM 8:34 AM :05 AM 8:43 AM :00 AM 8:38 AM :09 AM 8:47 AM :04 AM 8:42 AM 7 1 8:13 AM 8:51 AM :08 AM 8:46 AM 7 3 8:17 AM 8:55 AM :12 AM 8:50 AM 7 5 8:21 AM 8:59 AM Goes out of service 2 8:16 AM 8:54 AM 7 7 8:25 AM 9:03 AM Goes out of service 4 8:20 AM 8:58 AM Goes out of service 9 8:29 AM 9:07 AM 5 6 8:24 AM 9:02 AM Goes out of service 11 8:33 AM 9:11 AM Goes out of service 8 8:28 AM 9:06 AM :37 AM 9:15 AM Goes out of service 10 8:32 AM 9:10 AM Goes out of service 15 8:41 AM 9:19 AM :36 AM 9:14 AM Goes out of service 17 8:45 AM 9:23 AM Goes out of service 14 8:40 AM 9:18 AM :49 AM 9:27 AM Goes out of service 16 8:44 AM 9:22 AM :53 AM 9:31 AM :48 AM 9:26 AM Goes out of service 21 8:57 AM 9:35 AM Goes out of service 22 8:52 AM 9:30 AM 7 2 9:01 AM 9:39 AM 9 1 8:56 AM 9:34 AM Goes out of service 8 9:13 AM 9:51 AM 9 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-12

93 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekdays (continued) Off Peak 1 3 9:00 AM 9:38 AM :25 AM 10:03 AM 9 9 9:12 AM 9:50 AM :37 AM 10:15 AM 9 Off Peak Period 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) 6.5 hours Off Peak period :24 AM 10:02 AM :49 AM 10:27 AM 9 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 20 9:36 AM 10:14 AM :01 AM 10:39 AM 9 2 9:01 AM 4:03 PM 7:02 2 9:48 AM 10:26 AM :13 AM 10:51 AM 9 3 9:00 AM 4:02 PM 7: :00 AM 10:38 AM :25 AM 11:03 AM 9 8 9:13 AM 3:26 PM 6: :12 AM 10:50 AM :37 AM 11:15 AM 9 9 9:12 AM 3:27 PM 6: :24 AM 11:02 AM :49 AM 11:27 AM :25 AM 3:38 PM 6: :36 AM 11:14 AM :01 AM 11:39 AM :24 AM 3:39 PM 6: :48 AM 11:26 AM :13 AM 11:51 AM :36 AM 3:51 PM 6: :00 AM 11:38 AM :25 AM 12:03 PM :37 AM 3:50 PM 6: :12 AM 11:50 AM :37 AM 12:15 PM 9 51:28:00 Veh hrs during Off Peak :24 AM 12:02 PM :49 AM 12:27 PM :36 AM 12:14 PM :01 PM 12:39 PM :48 AM 12:26 PM :13 PM 12:51 PM :00 PM 12:38 PM :25 PM 1:03 PM :12 PM 12:50 PM :37 PM 1:15 PM :24 PM 1:02 PM :49 PM 1:27 PM :36 PM 1:14 PM :01 PM 1:39 PM :48 PM 1:26 PM :13 PM 1:51 PM 9 2 1:00 PM 1:38 PM :25 PM 2:03 PM 9 8 1:12 PM 1:50 PM :37 PM 2:15 PM :24 PM 2:02 PM :49 PM 2:27 PM :36 PM 2:14 PM :01 PM 2:39 PM 9 3 1:48 PM 2:26 PM :13 PM 2:51 PM 9 9 2:00 PM 2:38 PM :25 PM 3:03 PM :12 PM 2:50 PM :37 PM 3:15 PM :24 PM 3:02 PM :49 PM 3:27 PM 9 2 2:36 PM 3:14 PM :01 PM 3:39 PM 5 8 2:48 PM 3:26 PM :13 PM 3:51 PM :00 PM 3:38 PM 7 2 3:25 PM 4:03 PM :12 PM 3:50 PM 7 8 3:37 PM 4:15 PM 5 3 3:24 PM 4:02 PM 7 1 3:41 PM 4:19 PM 5 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-13

94 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekdays (continued) PM Peak 9 3:36 PM 4:14 PM :45 PM 4:23 PM 5 4 3:40 PM 4:18 PM 7 5 3:49 PM 4:27 PM 5 PM Peak Period (3:30 PM 6:59 PM) 3.5 hours PM Peak period 15 3:44 PM 4:22 PM 7 7 3:53 PM 4:31 PM 5 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 6 3:48 PM 4:26 PM :57 PM 4:35 PM 5 1 3:41 PM 7:15 PM 3: :52 PM 4:30 PM :01 PM 4:39 PM 5 2 4:08 PM 6:59 PM 2: :56 PM 4:34 PM :05 PM 4:43 PM 5 3 4:09 PM 6:58 PM 2: :00 PM 4:38 PM 7 3 4:09 PM 4:47 PM 5 4 3:40 PM 7:14 PM 3: :04 PM 4:42 PM :13 PM 4:51 PM 5 5 3:49 PM 7:23 PM 3:34 2 4:08 PM 4:46 PM :17 PM 4:55 PM 5 6 3:48 PM 7:22 PM 3: :12 PM 4:50 PM 7 9 4:21 PM 4:59 PM 5 7 3:53 PM 7:27 PM 3: :16 PM 4:54 PM 7 4 4:25 PM 5:03 PM 5 8 3:37 PM 7:11 PM 3:34 8 4:20 PM 4:58 PM :29 PM 5:07 PM 5 9 3:36 PM 7:10 PM 3:34 1 4:24 PM 5:02 PM 7 6 4:33 PM 5:11 PM :52 PM 7:26 PM 3: :28 PM 5:06 PM :37 PM 5:15 PM :01 PM 7:35 PM 3:34 5 4:32 PM 5:10 PM :41 PM 5:19 PM :00 PM 7:34 PM 3:34 7 4:36 PM 5:14 PM :45 PM 5:23 PM :05 PM 6:54 PM 2: :40 PM 5:18 PM :49 PM 5:27 PM :45 PM 7:19 PM 3: :44 PM 5:22 PM 7 2 4:53 PM 5:31 PM :44 PM 7:18 PM 3: :48 PM 5:26 PM :57 PM 5:35 PM :04 PM 6:55 PM 2:51 3 4:52 PM 5:30 PM :01 PM 5:39 PM :13 PM 7:02 PM 2: :56 PM 5:34 PM 7 8 5:05 PM 5:43 PM :12 PM 7:03 PM 2: :00 PM 5:38 PM 7 1 5:09 PM 5:47 PM :17 PM 7:06 PM 2:49 9 5:04 PM 5:42 PM :13 PM 5:51 PM :56 PM 7:30 PM 3:34 4 5:08 PM 5:46 PM 7 5 5:17 PM 5:55 PM :16 PM 7:07 PM 2: :12 PM 5:50 PM 7 7 5:21 PM 5:59 PM :57 PM 7:31 PM 3:34 6 5:16 PM 5:54 PM :25 PM 6:03 PM 5 72:36:00 veh hrs during PM Peak 10 5:20 PM 5:58 PM :29 PM 6:07 PM :24 PM 6:02 PM :33 PM 6:11 PM :28 PM 6:06 PM 7 3 5:37 PM 6:15 PM :32 PM 6:10 PM :41 PM 6:19 PM 5 2 5:36 PM 6:14 PM :45 PM 6:23 PM :40 PM 6:18 PM 7 9 5:49 PM 6:27 PM :44 PM 6:22 PM 7 4 5:53 PM 6:31 PM 5 8 5:48 PM 6:26 PM :57 PM 6:35 PM 5 1 5:52 PM 6:30 PM 7 6 6:01 PM 6:39 PM :56 PM 6:34 PM :05 PM 6:43 PM 5 5 6:00 PM 6:38 PM :09 PM 6:47 PM 5 7 6:04 PM 6:42 PM :13 PM 6:51 PM :08 PM 6:46 PM :17 PM 6:55 PM :12 PM 6:50 PM 7 2 6:21 PM 6:59 PM Goes out of service 13 6:16 PM 6:54 PM :25 PM 7:03 PM Goes out of service 3 6:20 PM 6:58 PM Goes out of service 21 6:29 PM 7:07 PM :24 PM 7:02 PM Goes out of service 8 6:33 PM 7:11 PM Goes out of service 19 6:28 PM 7:06 PM 7 1 6:37 PM 7:15 PM Goes out of service 9 6:32 PM 7:10 PM Goes out of service 14 6:41 PM 7:19 PM 5 4 6:36 PM 7:14 PM Goes out of service 5 6:45 PM 7:23 PM Goes out of service 15 6:40 PM 7:18 PM 7 7 6:49 PM 7:27 PM Goes out of service 6 6:44 PM 7:22 PM Goes out of service 22 6:53 PM 7:31 PM :48 PM 7:26 PM Goes out of service 11 6:57 PM 7:35 PM Goes out of service 20 6:52 PM 7:30 PM :01 PM 7:39 PM :56 PM 7:34 PM Goes out of service 19 7:13 PM 7:51 PM 9 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-14

95 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekdays (continued) Off Peak :00 PM 7:38 PM :25 PM 8:03 PM 9 Off Peak Period 2 (7 PM 11:59 AM) 5 hours Off Peak period :12 PM 7:50 PM :37 PM 8:15 PM 9 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 14 7:24 PM 8:02 PM :49 PM 8:27 PM :01 PM 12:27 AM 5: :36 PM 8:14 PM :01 PM 8:39 PM :24 PM 12:03 AM 4: :48 PM 8:26 PM :13 PM 8:51 PM :25 PM 12:02 AM 4: :00 PM 8:38 PM :25 PM 9:03 PM :00 PM 12:26 AM 5: :12 PM 8:50 PM :37 PM 9:15 PM :13 PM 11:50 PM 4: :24 PM 9:02 PM :49 PM 9:27 PM :37 PM 12:14 AM 4: :36 PM 9:14 PM :01 PM 9:39 PM :12 PM 11:51 PM 4: :48 PM 9:26 PM :13 PM 9:51 PM :36 PM 12:15 AM 4: :00 PM 9:38 PM :25 PM 10:03 PM 9 38:40:00 veh hrs during Off Peak :12 PM 9:50 PM :37 PM 10:15 PM :24 PM 10:02 PM :49 PM 10:27 PM :06:00 daily veh hours 19 9:36 PM 10:14 PM :01 PM 10:39 PM 9 56,275 annual veh hours (weekdays) 15 9:48 PM 10:26 PM :13 PM 10:51 PM 9 * Assumes 250 weekdays per year 20 10:00 PM 10:38 PM :25 PM 11:03 PM 9 AM/PM Peak 16 10:12 PM 10:50 PM :37 PM 11:15 PM 9 one way run time :24 PM 11:02 PM :49 PM 11:27 PM 9 layover time at terminal (both ends) :36 PM 11:14 PM :01 PM 11:39 PM 9 round trip cycle time :48 PM 11:26 PM :13 PM 11:51 PM Goes out of service peak headway :00 PM 11:38 PM :25 PM 12:03 AM Goes out of service peak buses rqd :12 PM 11:50 PM Goes out of service 22 11:37 PM 12:15 AM Goes out of service 15 11:24 PM 12:02 AM Goes out of service 13 11:49 PM 12:27 AM Goes out of service Off Peak Pd 20 11:36 PM 12:14 AM Goes out of service one way run time :48 PM 12:26 AM Goes out of service layover time at terminal (both ends) 20 round trip cycle time 96 off peak headway 12 off peak veh rqd 8.0 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-15

96 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekends/Holidays D-O Corridor - BRT Alternative Scenario 1 - Weekends run time 0:38 min run time 0:38 min Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals (min) 1 6:00 AM 6:38 AM :01 AM 6:39 AM 9 Weekends (6 AM 11:59 PM) 3 6:12 AM 6:50 AM :13 AM 6:51 AM 9 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 5 6:24 AM 7:02 AM :25 AM 7:03 AM 9 1 6:00 AM 12:14 AM 18:14 7 6:36 AM 7:14 AM :37 AM 7:15 AM 9 2 6:01 AM 12:15 AM 18:14 2 6:48 AM 7:26 AM :49 AM 7:27 AM 9 3 6:12 AM 12:26 AM 18:14 4 7:00 AM 7:38 AM :01 AM 7:39 AM 9 4 6:13 AM 12:27 AM 18:14 6 7:12 AM 7:50 AM :13 AM 7:51 AM 9 5 6:24 AM 11:51 PM 17:27 8 7:24 AM 8:02 AM :25 AM 8:03 AM 9 6 6:25 AM 11:50 PM 17:25 1 7:36 AM 8:14 AM :37 AM 8:15 AM 9 7 6:36 AM 12:03 AM 17:27 3 7:48 AM 8:26 AM :49 AM 8:27 AM 9 8 6:37 AM 12:02 AM 17:25 5 8:00 AM 8:38 AM :01 AM 8:39 AM :40:00 7 8:12 AM 8:50 AM :13 AM 8:51 AM 9 16,407 annual veh hours (weekends/holidays) 2 8:24 AM 9:02 AM :25 AM 9:03 AM 9 * Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year (115 days) 4 8:36 AM 9:14 AM :37 AM 9:15 AM 9 Weekends/Holidays* 6 8:48 AM 9:26 AM :49 AM 9:27 AM 9 one way run time :00 AM 9:38 AM :01 AM 9:39 AM 9 layover time at terminal (both ends) :12 AM 9:50 AM :13 AM 9:51 AM 9 round trip cycle time :24 AM 10:02 AM :25 AM 10:03 AM 9 off peak headway :36 AM 10:14 AM :37 AM 10:15 AM 9 off peak veh rqd :48 AM 10:26 AM :49 AM 10:27 AM :00 AM 10:38 AM :01 AM 10:39 AM 9 Annual Veh Hours (total) 72, :12 AM 10:50 AM :13 AM 10:51 AM :24 AM 11:02 AM :25 AM 11:03 AM :36 AM 11:14 AM :37 AM 11:15 AM :48 AM 11:26 AM :49 AM 11:27 AM :00 AM 11:38 AM :01 AM 11:39 AM :12 AM 11:50 AM :13 AM 11:51 AM :24 AM 12:02 PM :25 AM 12:03 PM :36 AM 12:14 PM :37 AM 12:15 PM :48 AM 12:26 PM :49 AM 12:27 PM :00 PM 12:38 PM :01 PM 12:39 PM :12 PM 12:50 PM :13 PM 12:51 PM :24 PM 1:02 PM :25 PM 1:03 PM :36 PM 1:14 PM :37 PM 1:15 PM :48 PM 1:26 PM :49 PM 1:27 PM 9 7 1:00 PM 1:38 PM :01 PM 1:39 PM 9 2 1:12 PM 1:50 PM :13 PM 1:51 PM 9 4 1:24 PM 2:02 PM :25 PM 2:03 PM 9 6 1:36 PM 2:14 PM :37 PM 2:15 PM 9 8 1:48 PM 2:26 PM :49 PM 2:27 PM 9 1 2:00 PM 2:38 PM :01 PM 2:39 PM 9 3 2:12 PM 2:50 PM :13 PM 2:51 PM 9 5 2:24 PM 3:02 PM :25 PM 3:03 PM 9 7 2:36 PM 3:14 PM :37 PM 3:15 PM 9 2 2:48 PM 3:26 PM :49 PM 3:27 PM 9 4 3:00 PM 3:38 PM :01 PM 3:39 PM 9 6 3:12 PM 3:50 PM :13 PM 3:51 PM 9 8 3:24 PM 4:02 PM :25 PM 4:03 PM 9 1 3:36 PM 4:14 PM :37 PM 4:15 PM 9 3 3:48 PM 4:26 PM :49 PM 4:27 PM 9 5 4:00 PM 4:38 PM :01 PM 4:39 PM 9 7 4:12 PM 4:50 PM :13 PM 4:51 PM 9 2 4:24 PM 5:02 PM :25 PM 5:03 PM 9 4 4:36 PM 5:14 PM :37 PM 5:15 PM 9 6 4:48 PM 5:26 PM :49 PM 5:27 PM 9 8 5:00 PM 5:38 PM :01 PM 5:39 PM 9 1 5:12 PM 5:50 PM :13 PM 5:51 PM 9 3 5:24 PM 6:02 PM :25 PM 6:03 PM 9 5 5:36 PM 6:14 PM :37 PM 6:15 PM 9 7 5:48 PM 6:26 PM :49 PM 6:27 PM 9 2 6:00 PM 6:38 PM :01 PM 6:39 PM 9 4 6:12 PM 6:50 PM :13 PM 6:51 PM 9 6 6:24 PM 7:02 PM :25 PM 7:03 PM 9 8 6:36 PM 7:14 PM :37 PM 7:15 PM 9 1 6:48 PM 7:26 PM :49 PM 7:27 PM 9 3 7:00 PM 7:38 PM :01 PM 7:39 PM 9 5 7:12 PM 7:50 PM :13 PM 7:51 PM 9 7 7:24 PM 8:02 PM :25 PM 8:03 PM 9 2 7:36 PM 8:14 PM :37 PM 8:15 PM 9 4 7:48 PM 8:26 PM :49 PM 8:27 PM 9 6 8:00 PM 8:38 PM :01 PM 8:39 PM 9 8 8:12 PM 8:50 PM :13 PM 8:51 PM 9 1 8:24 PM 9:02 PM :25 PM 9:03 PM 9 3 8:36 PM 9:14 PM :37 PM 9:15 PM 9 5 8:48 PM 9:26 PM :49 PM 9:27 PM 9 7 9:00 PM 9:38 PM :01 PM 9:39 PM 9 2 9:12 PM 9:50 PM :13 PM 9:51 PM 9 4 9:24 PM 10:02 PM :25 PM 10:03 PM 9 6 9:36 PM 10:14 PM :37 PM 10:15 PM 9 8 9:48 PM 10:26 PM :49 PM 10:27 PM :00 PM 10:38 PM :01 PM 10:39 PM :12 PM 10:50 PM :13 PM 10:51 PM :24 PM 11:02 PM :25 PM 11:03 PM :36 PM 11:14 PM :37 PM 11:15 PM :48 PM 11:26 PM :49 PM 11:27 PM :00 PM 11:38 PM :01 PM 11:39 PM :12 PM 11:50 PM Goes out of service 5 11:13 PM 11:51 PM Goes out of service 8 11:24 PM 12:02 AM Goes out of service 7 11:25 PM 12:03 AM Goes out of service 1 11:36 PM 12:14 AM Goes out of service 2 11:37 PM 12:15 AM Goes out of service 3 11:48 PM 12:26 AM Goes out of service 4 11:49 PM 12:27 AM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-16

97 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 1 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles Weekday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Peak AM (6:00 8:59 AM) , Off Peak 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) , Peak PM (3:30 6:59 PM) , Off Peak 2 (7 12 AM) Total Weekday Veh Miles 5, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 1,325, Assumptions: Peak Headway = Every 4 minutes Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.1 miles one way Weekend/Holiday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Off Peak 1 (6 AM 12 AM) , Total Weekday Veh Miles 3, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 353, Annual Veh. Miles (Total) 1,679, Assumptions: Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.1 miles one way Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-17

98 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 2 Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) 17.1 route miles End to End One Way Run Time (minutes) 38 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 7 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 90 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off peak (minutes) 96 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 7.5 minutes Off Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM 9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM 3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM 7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM 12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 12 peak vehicles Number of Off Peak Vehicles Required 8 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 15 vehicles Number of Cars per Train Set for Peak Service? N/A Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service? N/A Total Number of Stations 17 stations Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 41,133 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 16,411 Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 57,544 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 3,745 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 936,225 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 3,078 Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 353,970 Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,290,195 Bold indicates direct input into O&M Model. Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-18

99 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 2 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays D-O Corridor - BRT Alternative Scenario 2 - Weekdays Weekdays one way run time from end to end 0:38 min one way run time from end to end 0:38 min AM Peak Period (6:00 AM 8:59 AM) 3 hours AM Peak period Depart UNC Depart Arrive UNC Layover at UNC Hospitals Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals (min) Veh # begin end total hrs in service 1 6:00 AM 6:38 AM 7 2 6:00 AM 6:38 AM 7 1 6:00 AM 8:53 AM 2:53 3 6:07 AM 6:45 AM 7 4 6:07 AM 6:45 AM 7 2 6:00 AM 8:53 AM 2:53 5 6:15 AM 6:53 AM 7 6 6:15 AM 6:53 AM 7 3 6:07 AM 9:00 AM 2:53 7 6:22 AM 7:00 AM 7 8 6:22 AM 7:00 AM 7 4 6:07 AM 9:00 AM 2:53 9 6:30 AM 7:08 AM :30 AM 7:08 AM 7 5 6:15 AM 9:08 AM 2: :37 AM 7:15 AM :37 AM 7:15 AM 7 6 6:15 AM 9:08 AM 2:53 2 6:45 AM 7:23 AM 7 1 6:45 AM 7:23 AM 7 7 6:22 AM 9:15 AM 2:53 4 6:52 AM 7:30 AM 7 3 6:52 AM 7:30 AM 7 8 6:22 AM 9:15 AM 2:53 6 7:00 AM 7:38 AM 7 5 7:00 AM 7:38 AM 7 9 6:30 AM 9:23 AM 2:53 8 7:07 AM 7:45 AM 7 7 7:07 AM 7:45 AM :30 AM 9:23 AM 2: :15 AM 7:53 AM 7 9 7:15 AM 7:53 AM :37 AM 9:30 AM 2:53 AM Peak 12 7:22 AM 8:00 AM :22 AM 8:00 AM :37 AM 9:30 AM 2:53 1 7:30 AM 8:08 AM 7 2 7:30 AM 8:08 AM 7 34:36:00 veh hrs during AM Peak 3 7:37 AM 8:15 AM 7 4 7:37 AM 8:15 AM 7 5 7:45 AM 8:23 AM 7 6 7:45 AM 8:23 AM 7 7 7:52 AM 8:30 AM 7 8 7:52 AM 8:30 AM 7 9 8:00 AM 8:38 AM :00 AM 8:38 AM :07 AM 8:45 AM :07 AM 8:45 AM 7 2 8:15 AM 8:53 AM Goes out of service 1 8:15 AM 8:53 AM 7 4 8:22 AM 9:00 AM Goes out of service 3 8:22 AM 9:00 AM Goes out of service 6 8:30 AM 9:08 AM 4 5 8:30 AM 9:08 AM 4 8 8:37 AM 9:15 AM 9 7 8:37 AM 9:15 AM :45 AM 9:23 AM Goes out of service 9 8:45 AM 9:23 AM Goes out of service 12 8:52 AM 9:30 AM :52 AM 9:30 AM 6 1 9:00 AM 9:38 AM :00 AM 9:38 AM Off Peak Period 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) 6.5 hours Off Peak period 1 5 9:12 AM 9:50 AM :12 AM 9:50 AM 10 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 7 9:24 AM 10:02 AM :24 AM 10:02 AM :00 AM 3:14 PM 6: :36 AM 10:14 AM :36 AM 10:14 AM :00 AM 4:02 PM 7:02 4 9:48 AM 10:26 AM :48 AM 10:26 AM :12 AM 3:26 PM 6: :00 AM 10:38 AM :00 AM 10:38 AM :12 AM 3:26 PM 6: :12 AM 10:50 AM :12 AM 10:50 AM :24 AM 3:38 PM 6: :24 AM 11:02 AM :24 AM 11:02 AM :24 AM 3:38 PM 6: :36 AM 11:14 AM :36 AM 11:14 AM :36 AM 3:50 PM 6: :48 AM 11:26 AM :48 AM 11:26 AM :36 AM 3:50 PM 6: :00 AM 11:38 AM :00 AM 11:38 AM 10 50:40:00 Veh hrs during Off Peak :12 AM 11:50 AM :12 AM 11:50 AM :24 AM 12:02 PM :24 AM 12:02 PM :36 AM 12:14 PM :36 AM 12:14 PM :48 AM 12:26 PM :48 AM 12:26 PM :00 PM 12:38 PM :00 PM 12:38 PM 10 Off Peak :12 PM 12:50 PM :12 PM 12:50 PM :24 PM 1:02 PM :24 PM 1:02 PM :36 PM 1:14 PM :36 PM 1:14 PM :48 PM 1:26 PM :48 PM 1:26 PM :00 PM 1:38 PM :00 PM 1:38 PM :12 PM 1:50 PM :12 PM 1:50 PM :24 PM 2:02 PM :24 PM 2:02 PM :36 PM 2:14 PM :36 PM 2:14 PM :48 PM 2:26 PM :48 PM 2:26 PM :00 PM 2:38 PM :00 PM 2:38 PM :12 PM 2:50 PM :12 PM 2:50 PM :24 PM 3:02 PM :24 PM 3:02 PM :36 PM 3:14 PM :36 PM 3:14 PM :48 PM 3:26 PM 5 5 2:48 PM 3:26 PM 5 8 3:00 PM 3:38 PM 8 7 3:00 PM 3:38 PM :12 PM 3:50 PM :12 PM 3:50 PM 4 1 3:24 PM 4:02 PM 8 4 3:24 PM 4:02 PM 8 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-19

100 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 2 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays (Continued) PM Peak 2 Off Peak 2 5 3:31 PM 4:09 PM 7 6 3:31 PM 4:09 PM 7 PM Peak Period (3:30 PM 6:59 PM) 3.5 hours PM Peak period 3 3:39 PM 4:17 PM 7 2 3:39 PM 4:17 PM 7 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 7 3:46 PM 4:24 PM 7 8 3:46 PM 4:24 PM 7 1 4:09 PM 7:02 PM 2: :54 PM 4:32 PM :54 PM 4:32 PM 7 2 3:39 PM 7:17 PM 3:38 9 4:01 PM 4:39 PM :01 PM 4:39 PM 7 3 3:39 PM 7:17 PM 3:38 4 4:09 PM 4:47 PM 7 1 4:09 PM 4:47 PM 7 4 4:09 PM 7:02 PM 2:53 6 4:16 PM 4:54 PM 7 5 4:16 PM 4:54 PM 7 5 3:31 PM 7:09 PM 3:38 2 4:24 PM 5:02 PM 7 3 4:24 PM 5:02 PM 7 6 3:31 PM 7:09 PM 3:38 8 4:31 PM 5:09 PM 7 7 4:31 PM 5:09 PM 7 7 3:46 PM 7:24 PM 3: :39 PM 5:17 PM :39 PM 5:17 PM 7 8 3:46 PM 7:24 PM 3: :46 PM 5:24 PM 7 9 4:46 PM 5:24 PM 7 9 4:01 PM 6:54 PM 2:53 1 4:54 PM 5:32 PM 7 4 4:54 PM 5:32 PM :01 PM 6:54 PM 2:53 5 5:01 PM 5:39 PM 7 6 5:01 PM 5:39 PM :54 PM 7:32 PM 3:38 3 5:09 PM 5:47 PM 7 2 5:09 PM 5:47 PM :54 PM 7:32 PM 3:38 7 5:16 PM 5:54 PM 7 8 5:16 PM 5:54 PM 7 40:36:00 veh hrs during PM Peak 11 5:24 PM 6:02 PM :24 PM 6:02 PM 7 9 5:31 PM 6:09 PM :31 PM 6:09 PM 7 4 5:39 PM 6:17 PM 7 1 5:39 PM 6:17 PM 7 6 5:46 PM 6:24 PM 7 5 5:46 PM 6:24 PM 7 2 5:54 PM 6:32 PM 7 3 5:54 PM 6:32 PM 7 8 6:01 PM 6:39 PM 7 7 6:01 PM 6:39 PM :09 PM 6:47 PM :09 PM 6:47 PM :16 PM 6:54 PM 7 9 6:16 PM 6:54 PM 7 1 6:24 PM 7:02 PM Goes out of service 4 6:24 PM 7:02 PM 5 6:31 PM 7:09 PM 4 6 6:31 PM 7:09 PM 4 3 6:39 PM 7:17 PM 8 2 6:39 PM 7:17 PM 8 7 6:46 PM 7:24 PM Goes out of service 8 6:46 PM 7:24 PM Goes out of service 11 6:54 PM 7:32 PM :54 PM 7:32 PM 5 9 7:01 PM 7:39 PM :01 PM 7:39 PM 10 Off Peak Period 2 (7 PM 11:59 AM) 6 7:13 PM 7:51 PM :13 PM 7:51 PM 10 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 5 hours Off Peak period 2 2 7:25 PM 8:03 PM :25 PM 8:03 PM :25 PM 12:03 AM 4: :37 PM 8:15 PM :37 PM 8:15 PM :25 PM 12:03 AM 4: :49 PM 8:27 PM :49 PM 8:27 PM :13 PM 11:51 PM 4:38 5 8:01 PM 8:39 PM :01 PM 8:39 PM :13 PM 11:51 PM 4:38 3 8:13 PM 8:51 PM :13 PM 8:51 PM :01 PM 12:27 AM 5: :25 PM 9:03 PM :25 PM 9:03 PM :01 PM 12:27 AM 5:26 9 8:37 PM 9:15 PM :37 PM 9:15 PM :37 PM 12:15 AM 4:38 6 8:49 PM 9:27 PM :49 PM 9:27 PM :37 PM 12:15 AM 4:38 2 9:01 PM 9:39 PM :01 PM 9:39 PM 10 38:40:00 veh hrs during Off Peak :13 PM 9:51 PM :13 PM 9:51 PM :25 PM 10:03 PM :25 PM 10:03 PM :32:00 daily veh hours 5 9:37 PM 10:15 PM :37 PM 10:15 PM 10 41,133 annual veh hours (weekdays) 3 9:49 PM 10:27 PM :49 PM 10:27 PM :01 PM 10:39 PM :01 PM 10:39 PM 10 * Assumes 250 weekdays per year 9 10:13 PM 10:51 PM :13 PM 10:51 PM 10 AM/PM Peak 6 10:25 PM 11:03 PM :25 PM 11:03 PM 10 one way run time :37 PM 11:15 PM :37 PM 11:15 PM 10 layover time at terminal (both ends) :49 PM 11:27 PM :49 PM 11:27 PM 10 round trip cycle time :01 PM 11:39 PM :01 PM 11:39 PM 10 peak headway :13 PM 11:51 PM Goes out of service 6 11:13 PM 11:51 PM Goes out of service peak buses rqd :25 PM 12:03 AM Goes out of service 2 11:25 PM 12:03 AM Goes out of service 11 11:37 PM 12:15 AM Goes out of service 12 11:37 PM 12:15 AM Goes out of service Off Peak Pd 9 11:49 PM 12:27 AM Goes out of service 10 11:49 PM 12:27 AM Goes out of service one way run time 38 layover time at terminal (both ends) 20 round trip cycle time 96 off peak headway 12 off peak veh rqd 8.0 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-20

101 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 2 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekends/Holidays D-O Corridor - BRT Alternative Scenario 2 - Weekends one way run time from one way run time end to end 0:38 min from end to end 0:38 min Depart UNC Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Depart Vehicle # Alston Arrive UNC Hospitals Layover at UNC Hospitals (min) Weekends (6 AM 11:59 PM) 1 6:00 AM 6:38 AM :00 AM 6:38 AM 10 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 3 6:12 AM 6:50 AM :12 AM 6:50 AM :00 AM 12:14 AM 18:14 5 6:24 AM 7:02 AM :24 AM 7:02 AM :00 AM 12:14 AM 18:14 7 6:36 AM 7:14 AM :36 AM 7:14 AM :12 AM 12:26 AM 18:14 2 6:48 AM 7:26 AM :48 AM 7:26 AM :12 AM 12:26 AM 18:14 4 7:00 AM 7:38 AM :00 AM 7:38 AM :24 AM 11:50 PM 17:26 6 7:12 AM 7:50 AM :12 AM 7:50 AM :24 AM 11:50 PM 17:26 8 7:24 AM 8:02 AM :24 AM 8:02 AM :36 AM 12:02 AM 17:26 1 7:36 AM 8:14 AM :36 AM 8:14 AM :36 AM 12:02 AM 17:26 3 7:48 AM 8:26 AM :48 AM 8:26 AM :40:00 5 8:00 AM 8:38 AM :00 AM 8:38 AM 10 16,411 annual veh hours (weekends/holiday 7 8:12 AM 8:50 AM :12 AM 8:50 AM 10 * Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year (115 days) 2 8:24 AM 9:02 AM :24 AM 9:02 AM 10 Weekends/Holidays* 4 8:36 AM 9:14 AM :36 AM 9:14 AM 10 one way run time :48 AM 9:26 AM :48 AM 9:26 AM 10 layover time at terminal (both ends) :00 AM 9:38 AM :00 AM 9:38 AM 10 round trip cycle time :12 AM 9:50 AM :12 AM 9:50 AM 10 off peak headway :24 AM 10:02 AM :24 AM 10:02 AM 10 off peak veh rqd :36 AM 10:14 AM :36 AM 10:14 AM :48 AM 10:26 AM :48 AM 10:26 AM 10 Annual Veh Hours (total) 57, :00 AM 10:38 AM :00 AM 10:38 AM :12 AM 10:50 AM :12 AM 10:50 AM :24 AM 11:02 AM :24 AM 11:02 AM :36 AM 11:14 AM :36 AM 11:14 AM :48 AM 11:26 AM :48 AM 11:26 AM :00 AM 11:38 AM :00 AM 11:38 AM :12 AM 11:50 AM :12 AM 11:50 AM :24 AM 12:02 PM :24 AM 12:02 PM :36 AM 12:14 PM :36 AM 12:14 PM :48 AM 12:26 PM :48 AM 12:26 PM :00 PM 12:38 PM :00 PM 12:38 PM :12 PM 12:50 PM :12 PM 12:50 PM :24 PM 1:02 PM :24 PM 1:02 PM :36 PM 1:14 PM :36 PM 1:14 PM :48 PM 1:26 PM :48 PM 1:26 PM :00 PM 1:38 PM :00 PM 1:38 PM :12 PM 1:50 PM :12 PM 1:50 PM :24 PM 2:02 PM :24 PM 2:02 PM :36 PM 2:14 PM :36 PM 2:14 PM :48 PM 2:26 PM :48 PM 2:26 PM :00 PM 2:38 PM :00 PM 2:38 PM :12 PM 2:50 PM :12 PM 2:50 PM :24 PM 3:02 PM :24 PM 3:02 PM :36 PM 3:14 PM :36 PM 3:14 PM :48 PM 3:26 PM :48 PM 3:26 PM :00 PM 3:38 PM :00 PM 3:38 PM :12 PM 3:50 PM :12 PM 3:50 PM :24 PM 4:02 PM :24 PM 4:02 PM :36 PM 4:14 PM :36 PM 4:14 PM :48 PM 4:26 PM :48 PM 4:26 PM :00 PM 4:38 PM :00 PM 4:38 PM :12 PM 4:50 PM :12 PM 4:50 PM :24 PM 5:02 PM :24 PM 5:02 PM :36 PM 5:14 PM :36 PM 5:14 PM :48 PM 5:26 PM :48 PM 5:26 PM :00 PM 5:38 PM :00 PM 5:38 PM :12 PM 5:50 PM :12 PM 5:50 PM :24 PM 6:02 PM :24 PM 6:02 PM :36 PM 6:14 PM :36 PM 6:14 PM :48 PM 6:26 PM :48 PM 6:26 PM :00 PM 6:38 PM :00 PM 6:38 PM :12 PM 6:50 PM :12 PM 6:50 PM :24 PM 7:02 PM :24 PM 7:02 PM :36 PM 7:14 PM :36 PM 7:14 PM :48 PM 7:26 PM :48 PM 7:26 PM :00 PM 7:38 PM :00 PM 7:38 PM :12 PM 7:50 PM :12 PM 7:50 PM :24 PM 8:02 PM :24 PM 8:02 PM :36 PM 8:14 PM :36 PM 8:14 PM :48 PM 8:26 PM :48 PM 8:26 PM :00 PM 8:38 PM :00 PM 8:38 PM :12 PM 8:50 PM :12 PM 8:50 PM :24 PM 9:02 PM :24 PM 9:02 PM :36 PM 9:14 PM :36 PM 9:14 PM :48 PM 9:26 PM :48 PM 9:26 PM :00 PM 9:38 PM :00 PM 9:38 PM :12 PM 9:50 PM :12 PM 9:50 PM :24 PM 10:02 PM :24 PM 10:02 PM :36 PM 10:14 PM :36 PM 10:14 PM :48 PM 10:26 PM :48 PM 10:26 PM :00 PM 10:38 PM :00 PM 10:38 PM :12 PM 10:50 PM :12 PM 10:50 PM :24 PM 11:02 PM :24 PM 11:02 PM :36 PM 11:14 PM :36 PM 11:14 PM :48 PM 11:26 PM :48 PM 11:26 PM :00 PM 11:38 PM :00 PM 11:38 PM :12 PM 11:50 PM Goes out of service 5 11:12 PM 11:50 PM Goes out of service 8 11:24 PM 12:02 AM Goes out of service 7 11:24 PM 12:02 AM Goes out of service 1 11:36 PM 12:14 AM Goes out of service 2 11:36 PM 12:14 AM Goes out of service 3 11:48 PM 12:26 AM Goes out of service 4 11:48 PM 12:26 AM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-21

102 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT High Scenario 2 Annual Vehicle Miles Weekday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Peak AM (6:00 8:59 AM) Off Peak 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) , Peak PM (3:30 6:59 PM) Off Peak 2 (7 12 AM) Total Weekday Veh Miles 3, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 936, Assumptions: Peak Headway = Every 7.5 minutes Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.1 miles one way Weekend/Holiday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Off Peak 1 (6 AM 12 AM) , Total Weekday Veh Miles 3, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 353, Assumptions: Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.1 miles one way Annual Veh. Miles (Total) 1,290, Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-22

103 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) 17.7 route miles Average Operating Speed (mph) mph End to End One Way Run Time (minutes) 44 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 5 and 3 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 96 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off peak (minutes) 96 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 4 minutes Off Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM 9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM 3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM 7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM 12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 24 peak vehicles Number of Off Peak Vehicles Required 8off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 5 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 29 vehicles Number of Cars per Train Set for Peak Service? N/A Number of Cars per Train-Set for Off-Peak Service? N/A Total Number of Stations 18 stations Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Assumes 250 weekdays per Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 58,963 year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 14,484 per year Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 73,447 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 5,487 Assumes 250 weekdays per Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,371,750 year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 3,186 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 366,390 per year Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,738,140 Bold indicates direct input into O&M Model. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-23

104 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays AM Peak D-O Corridor - BRT Low Alternative Scenario 3 - Weekdays Weekdays one way run time from end to end 0:44 min one way run time from end to end 0:44 min AM Peak Period (6:00 AM 8:59 AM) 3 hours AM Peak period Depart UNC Depart Arrive UNC Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals Layover at UNC Hospitals (min) Veh # begin end total hrs in service 1 6:00 AM 6:44 AM 5 2 6:05 AM 6:49 AM 3 1 6:00 AM 9:09 AM 3:09 3 6:04 AM 6:48 AM 5 4 6:09 AM 6:53 AM 3 2 6:05 AM 9:12 AM 3:07 5 6:08 AM 6:52 AM 5 6 6:13 AM 6:57 AM 3 3 6:04 AM 9:13 AM 3:09 7 6:12 AM 6:56 AM 5 8 6:17 AM 7:01 AM 3 4 6:09 AM 9:16 AM 3:07 9 6:16 AM 7:00 AM :21 AM 7:05 AM 3 5 6:08 AM 9:17 AM 3: :20 AM 7:04 AM :25 AM 7:09 AM 3 6 6:13 AM 9:20 AM 3: :24 AM 7:08 AM :29 AM 7:13 AM 3 7 6:12 AM 9:21 AM 3: :28 AM 7:12 AM :33 AM 7:17 AM 3 8 6:17 AM 9:24 AM 3: :32 AM 7:16 AM :37 AM 7:21 AM 3 9 6:16 AM 9:25 AM 3: :36 AM 7:20 AM :45 AM 7:29 AM :21 AM 9:28 AM 3: :40 AM 7:24 AM 5 1 6:49 AM 7:33 AM :20 AM 9:29 AM 3: :44 AM 7:28 AM 5 3 6:53 AM 7:37 AM :25 AM 9:32 AM 3: :48 AM 7:32 AM 5 5 6:57 AM 7:41 AM :24 AM 9:33 AM 3:09 2 6:52 AM 7:36 AM 5 7 7:01 AM 7:45 AM :29 AM 9:36 AM 3:07 4 6:56 AM 7:40 AM 5 9 7:05 AM 7:49 AM :28 AM 9:37 AM 3:09 6 7:00 AM 7:44 AM :09 AM 7:53 AM :33 AM 9:40 AM 3:07 8 7:04 AM 7:48 AM :13 AM 7:57 AM :32 AM 9:41 AM 3: :08 AM 7:52 AM :17 AM 8:01 AM :37 AM 8:57 AM 2: :12 AM 7:56 AM :21 AM 8:05 AM :36 AM 8:56 AM 2: :16 AM 8:00 AM :25 AM 8:09 AM :45 AM 9:05 AM 2: :20 AM 8:04 AM :29 AM 8:13 AM :40 AM 9:00 AM 2: :24 AM 8:08 AM :33 AM 8:17 AM :44 AM 9:04 AM 2: :28 AM 8:12 AM :37 AM 8:21 AM :48 AM 9:08 AM 2: :32 AM 8:16 AM 5 2 7:41 AM 8:25 AM :28 AM 9:01 AM 1:33 1 7:36 AM 8:20 AM 5 4 7:45 AM 8:29 AM 3 68:50:00 veh hrs during AM Peak 3 7:40 AM 8:24 AM 5 6 7:49 AM 8:33 AM 3 5 7:44 AM 8:28 AM 5 8 7:53 AM 8:37 AM 3 7 7:48 AM 8:32 AM :57 AM 8:41 AM 3 9 7:52 AM 8:36 AM :01 AM 8:45 AM :56 AM 8:40 AM :05 AM 8:49 AM :00 AM 8:44 AM :09 AM 8:53 AM :04 AM 8:48 AM :13 AM 8:57 AM :08 AM 8:52 AM :17 AM 9:01 AM Goes out of service 19 8:12 AM 8:56 AM :21 AM 9:05 AM Goes out of service 21 8:16 AM 9:00 AM Goes out of service 1 8:25 AM 9:09 AM :20 AM 9:04 AM Goes out of service 3 8:29 AM 9:13 AM Goes out of service 23 8:24 AM 9:08 AM 5 5 8:33 AM 9:17 AM Goes out of service 2 8:28 AM 9:12 AM Goes out of service 7 8:37 AM 9:21 AM 3 4 8:32 AM 9:16 AM 5 9 8:41 AM 9:25 AM Goes out of service 6 8:36 AM 9:20 AM Goes out of service 11 8:45 AM 9:29 AM Goes out of service 8 8:40 AM 9:24 AM Goes out of service 13 8:49 AM 9:33 AM :44 AM 9:28 AM Goes out of service 15 8:53 AM 9:37 AM Goes out of service 12 8:48 AM 9:32 AM :57 AM 9:41 AM Goes out of service 14 8:52 AM 9:36 AM Goes out of service 19 9:01 AM 9:45 AM :56 AM 9:40 AM Goes out of service 23 9:13 AM 9:57 AM 3 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-24

105 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays Off Peak :00 AM 9:44 AM 5 4 9:25 AM 10:09 AM 3 1 9:12 AM 9:56 AM :37 AM 10:21 AM 3 Off Peak Period 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) 6.5 hours Off Peak period 1 7 9:24 AM 10:08 AM :49 AM 10:33 AM 3 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 13 9:36 AM 10:20 AM :01 AM 10:45 AM 3 1 9:12 AM 3:33 PM 6: :48 AM 10:32 AM :13 AM 10:57 AM 3 4 9:25 AM 3:44 PM 6: :00 AM 10:44 AM :25 AM 11:09 AM 3 7 9:24 AM 3:45 PM 6: :12 AM 10:56 AM :37 AM 11:21 AM :37 AM 3:56 PM 6: :24 AM 11:08 AM :49 AM 11:33 AM :36 AM 3:57 PM 6: :36 AM 11:20 AM :01 AM 11:45 AM :00 AM 4:08 PM 7: :48 AM 11:32 AM :13 AM 11:57 AM :01 AM 4:09 PM 7: :00 AM 11:44 AM :25 AM 12:09 PM :13 AM 3:32 PM 6: :12 AM 11:56 AM :37 AM 12:21 PM 3 52:16:00 Veh hrs during Off Peak :24 AM 12:08 PM :49 AM 12:33 PM :36 AM 12:20 PM :01 PM 12:45 PM :48 AM 12:32 PM :13 PM 12:57 PM :00 PM 12:44 PM :25 PM 1:09 PM :12 PM 12:56 PM :37 PM 1:21 PM :24 PM 1:08 PM :49 PM 1:33 PM :36 PM 1:20 PM :01 PM 1:45 PM :48 PM 1:32 PM 5 1 1:13 PM 1:57 PM :00 PM 1:44 PM 5 7 1:25 PM 2:09 PM :12 PM 1:56 PM :37 PM 2:21 PM 3 4 1:24 PM 2:08 PM :49 PM 2:33 PM :36 PM 2:20 PM :01 PM 2:45 PM :48 PM 2:32 PM 5 4 2:13 PM 2:57 PM 3 1 2:00 PM 2:44 PM :25 PM 3:09 PM 3 7 2:12 PM 2:56 PM :37 PM 3:21 PM :24 PM 3:08 PM 5 1 2:49 PM 3:33 PM :36 PM 3:20 PM 5 7 3:01 PM 3:45 PM :48 PM 3:32 PM :13 PM 3:57 PM 3 4 3:00 PM 3:44 PM :25 PM 4:09 PM :12 PM 3:56 PM :37 PM 4:21 PM :24 PM 4:08 PM 5 2 3:41 PM 4:25 PM 3 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-25

106 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays PM Peak 1 3:36 PM 4:20 PM 5 6 3:45 PM 4:29 PM 3 3 3:40 PM 4:24 PM 5 4 3:49 PM 4:33 PM 3 PM Peak Period (3:30 PM 6:59 PM) 3.5 hours PM Peak period 5 3:44 PM 4:28 PM 5 8 3:53 PM 4:37 PM 3 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 7 3:48 PM 4:32 PM :57 PM 4:41 PM 3 1 3:36 PM 7:32 PM 3:56 9 3:52 PM 4:36 PM :01 PM 4:45 PM 3 2 3:41 PM 7:37 PM 3: :56 PM 4:40 PM :05 PM 4:49 PM 3 3 3:40 PM 7:36 PM 3: :00 PM 4:44 PM :09 PM 4:53 PM 3 4 3:49 PM 6:56 PM 3: :04 PM 4:48 PM :13 PM 4:57 PM 3 5 3:44 PM 7:40 PM 3: :08 PM 4:52 PM :17 PM 5:01 PM 3 6 3:45 PM 7:41 PM 3: :12 PM 4:56 PM :21 PM 5:05 PM 3 7 3:48 PM 6:57 PM 3: :16 PM 5:00 PM 5 1 4:25 PM 5:09 PM 3 8 3:53 PM 7:00 PM 3: :20 PM 5:04 PM 5 3 4:29 PM 5:13 PM 3 9 3:52 PM 7:01 PM 3: :24 PM 5:08 PM 5 5 4:33 PM 5:17 PM :56 PM 7:05 PM 3:09 2 4:28 PM 5:12 PM 5 7 4:37 PM 5:21 PM :57 PM 7:04 PM 3:07 6 4:32 PM 5:16 PM 5 9 4:41 PM 5:25 PM :01 PM 7:08 PM 3:07 4 4:36 PM 5:20 PM :45 PM 5:29 PM :00 PM 7:09 PM 3:09 8 4:40 PM 5:24 PM :49 PM 5:33 PM :05 PM 7:12 PM 3: :44 PM 5:28 PM :53 PM 5:37 PM :04 PM 7:13 PM 3: :48 PM 5:32 PM :57 PM 5:41 PM :09 PM 7:16 PM 3: :52 PM 5:36 PM :01 PM 5:45 PM :08 PM 7:17 PM 3: :56 PM 5:40 PM :05 PM 5:49 PM :13 PM 7:20 PM 3: :00 PM 5:44 PM :09 PM 5:53 PM :12 PM 7:21 PM 3: :04 PM 5:48 PM :13 PM 5:57 PM :17 PM 7:24 PM 3: :08 PM 5:52 PM 5 2 5:17 PM 6:01 PM :16 PM 7:25 PM 3:09 1 5:12 PM 5:56 PM 5 6 5:21 PM 6:05 PM :21 PM 7:28 PM 3:07 3 5:16 PM 6:00 PM 5 4 5:25 PM 6:09 PM :37 PM 7:33 PM 3:56 5 5:20 PM 6:04 PM 5 8 5:29 PM 6:13 PM :20 PM 7:29 PM 3:09 7 5:24 PM 6:08 PM :33 PM 6:17 PM 3 80:00:00 veh hrs during PM Peak 9 5:28 PM 6:12 PM :37 PM 6:21 PM :32 PM 6:16 PM :41 PM 6:25 PM :36 PM 6:20 PM :45 PM 6:29 PM :40 PM 6:24 PM :49 PM 6:33 PM :44 PM 6:28 PM :53 PM 6:37 PM :48 PM 6:32 PM :57 PM 6:41 PM :52 PM 6:36 PM 5 1 6:01 PM 6:45 PM :56 PM 6:40 PM 5 3 6:05 PM 6:49 PM :00 PM 6:44 PM 5 5 6:09 PM 6:53 PM 3 2 6:04 PM 6:48 PM 5 7 6:13 PM 6:57 PM 3 6 6:08 PM 6:52 PM 5 9 6:17 PM 7:01 PM Goes out of service 4 6:12 PM 6:56 PM :21 PM 7:05 PM Goes out of service 8 6:16 PM 7:00 PM Goes out of service 13 6:25 PM 7:09 PM :20 PM 7:04 PM Goes out of service 15 6:29 PM 7:13 PM Goes out of service 12 6:24 PM 7:08 PM :33 PM 7:17 PM Goes out of service 14 6:28 PM 7:12 PM Goes out of service 19 6:37 PM 7:21 PM :32 PM 7:16 PM Goes out of service 21 6:41 PM 7:25 PM Goes out of service 18 6:36 PM 7:20 PM :45 PM 7:29 PM Goes out of service 20 6:40 PM 7:24 PM Goes out of service 23 6:49 PM 7:33 PM :44 PM 7:28 PM Goes out of service 2 6:53 PM 7:37 PM Goes out of service 1 6:48 PM 7:32 PM 5 6 6:57 PM 7:41 PM Goes out of service 3 6:52 PM 7:36 PM Goes out of service 4 7:01 PM 7:45 PM 3 5 6:56 PM 7:40 PM Goes out of service 12 7:13 PM 7:57 PM 3 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-26

107 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays Off Peak 2 7 7:00 PM 7:44 PM :25 PM 8:09 PM 3 Off Peak Period 2 (7 PM 11:59 AM) 13 7:12 PM 7:56 PM 5 1 7:37 PM 8:21 PM 3 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 5 hours Off Peak period :24 PM 8:08 PM 5 7 7:49 PM 8:33 PM 3 4 7:01 PM 12:33 AM 5: :36 PM 8:20 PM :01 PM 8:45 PM 3 7 7:00 PM 12:32 AM 5:32 4 7:48 PM 8:32 PM :13 PM 8:57 PM :13 PM 11:56 PM 4: :00 PM 8:44 PM :25 PM 9:09 PM :12 PM 11:57 PM 4: :12 PM 8:56 PM 5 4 8:37 PM 9:21 PM :25 PM 12:08 AM 4:43 1 8:24 PM 9:08 PM :49 PM 9:33 PM :24 PM 12:09 AM 4:45 7 8:36 PM 9:20 PM :01 PM 9:45 PM :36 PM 12:21 AM 4: :48 PM 9:32 PM 5 1 9:13 PM 9:57 PM 3 34:45:00 veh hrs during Off Peak :00 PM 9:44 PM 5 7 9:25 PM 10:09 PM :12 PM 9:56 PM :37 PM 10:21 PM :51:00 daily veh hours 4 9:24 PM 10:08 PM :49 PM 10:33 PM 3 58,963 annual veh hours (weekdays) 12 9:36 PM 10:20 PM :01 PM 10:45 PM 3 * Assumes 250 weekdays per year 18 9:48 PM 10:32 PM :13 PM 10:57 PM 3 AM/PM Peak 1 10:00 PM 10:44 PM :25 PM 11:09 PM 3 one way run time :12 PM 10:56 PM :37 PM 11:21 PM 3 layover time at terminal (both ends) :24 PM 11:08 PM :49 PM 11:33 PM 3 round trip cycle time :36 PM 11:20 PM :01 PM 11:45 PM 3 peak headway :48 PM 11:32 PM :13 PM 11:57 PM Goes out of service peak buses rqd :00 PM 11:44 PM :25 PM 12:09 AM Goes out of service 12 11:12 PM 11:56 PM Goes out of service 23 11:37 PM 12:21 AM Goes out of service Off Peak Pd 18 11:24 PM 12:08 AM Goes out of service 4 11:49 PM 12:33 AM Goes out of service one way run time :36 PM 12:20 AM Goes out of service layover time at terminal (both ends) :48 PM 12:32 AM Goes out of service round trip cycle time 96 off peak headway 12 off peak veh rqd 8.0 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-27

108 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekends/Holidays D-O Corridor - BRT Low Alternative Scenario 3 - Weekends run time 0:44 min run time 0:44 min 96 Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals Layover at UNC Hospitals (min) 1 6:00 AM 6:44 AM 5 2 6:01 AM 6:45 AM 3 Weekends (6 AM 11:59 PM) begin end total hrs in service 3 6:12 AM 6:56 AM 5 4 6:13 AM 6:57 AM 3 Veh # 5 6:24 AM 7:08 AM 5 6 6:25 AM 7:09 AM 3 1 6:00 AM 12:20 AM 18:20 7 6:36 AM 7:20 AM 5 8 6:37 AM 7:21 AM 3 2 6:01 AM 12:21 AM 18:20 2 6:48 AM 7:32 AM 5 1 6:49 AM 7:33 AM 3 3 6:12 AM 12:32 AM 18:20 4 7:00 AM 7:44 AM 5 3 7:01 AM 7:45 AM 3 4 6:13 AM 12:33 AM 18:20 6 7:12 AM 7:56 AM 5 5 7:13 AM 7:57 AM 3 5 6:24 AM 11:57 PM 17:33 8 7:24 AM 8:08 AM 5 7 7:25 AM 8:09 AM 3 6 6:25 AM 11:56 PM 17:31 1 7:36 AM 8:20 AM 5 2 7:37 AM 8:21 AM 3 7 6:36 AM 12:09 AM 17:33 3 7:48 AM 8:32 AM 5 4 7:49 AM 8:33 AM 3 8 6:37 AM 12:08 AM 5 8:00 AM 8:44 AM 5 6 8:01 AM 8:45 AM :57:00 annual veh hours (weekends/holidays) 7 8:12 AM 8:56 AM 5 8 8:13 AM 8:57 AM 3 14, :24 AM 9:08 AM 5 1 8:25 AM 9:09 AM 3 4 8:36 AM 9:20 AM 5 3 8:37 AM 9:21 AM 3 * Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year (115 days) 6 8:48 AM 9:32 AM 5 5 8:49 AM 9:33 AM 3 Weekends/Holidays* 8 9:00 AM 9:44 AM 5 7 9:01 AM 9:45 AM 3 one way run time :12 AM 9:56 AM 5 2 9:13 AM 9:57 AM 3 layover time at terminal (both ends) 8 3 9:24 AM 10:08 AM 5 4 9:25 AM 10:09 AM 3 round trip cycle time :36 AM 10:20 AM 5 6 9:37 AM 10:21 AM 3 off peak headway :48 AM 10:32 AM 5 8 9:49 AM 10:33 AM 3 off peak veh rqd :00 AM 10:44 AM :01 AM 10:45 AM 3 Annual Veh Hours (total) 73, :12 AM 10:56 AM :13 AM 10:57 AM :24 AM 11:08 AM :25 AM 11:09 AM :36 AM 11:20 AM :37 AM 11:21 AM :48 AM 11:32 AM :49 AM 11:33 AM :00 AM 11:44 AM :01 AM 11:45 AM :12 AM 11:56 AM :13 AM 11:57 AM :24 AM 12:08 PM :25 AM 12:09 PM :36 AM 12:20 PM :37 AM 12:21 PM :48 AM 12:32 PM :49 AM 12:33 PM :00 PM 12:44 PM :01 PM 12:45 PM :12 PM 12:56 PM :13 PM 12:57 PM :24 PM 1:08 PM :25 PM 1:09 PM :36 PM 1:20 PM :37 PM 1:21 PM :48 PM 1:32 PM :49 PM 1:33 PM 3 7 1:00 PM 1:44 PM 5 8 1:01 PM 1:45 PM 3 2 1:12 PM 1:56 PM 5 1 1:13 PM 1:57 PM 3 4 1:24 PM 2:08 PM 5 3 1:25 PM 2:09 PM 3 6 1:36 PM 2:20 PM 5 5 1:37 PM 2:21 PM 3 8 1:48 PM 2:32 PM 5 7 1:49 PM 2:33 PM 3 1 2:00 PM 2:44 PM 5 2 2:01 PM 2:45 PM 3 3 2:12 PM 2:56 PM 5 4 2:13 PM 2:57 PM 3 5 2:24 PM 3:08 PM 5 6 2:25 PM 3:09 PM 3 7 2:36 PM 3:20 PM 5 8 2:37 PM 3:21 PM 3 2 2:48 PM 3:32 PM 5 1 2:49 PM 3:33 PM 3 4 3:00 PM 3:44 PM 5 3 3:01 PM 3:45 PM 3 6 3:12 PM 3:56 PM 5 5 3:13 PM 3:57 PM 3 8 3:24 PM 4:08 PM 5 7 3:25 PM 4:09 PM 3 1 3:36 PM 4:20 PM 5 2 3:37 PM 4:21 PM 3 3 3:48 PM 4:32 PM 5 4 3:49 PM 4:33 PM 3 5 4:00 PM 4:44 PM 5 6 4:01 PM 4:45 PM 3 7 4:12 PM 4:56 PM 5 8 4:13 PM 4:57 PM 3 2 4:24 PM 5:08 PM 5 1 4:25 PM 5:09 PM 3 4 4:36 PM 5:20 PM 5 3 4:37 PM 5:21 PM 3 6 4:48 PM 5:32 PM 5 5 4:49 PM 5:33 PM 3 8 5:00 PM 5:44 PM 5 7 5:01 PM 5:45 PM 3 1 5:12 PM 5:56 PM 5 2 5:13 PM 5:57 PM 3 3 5:24 PM 6:08 PM 5 4 5:25 PM 6:09 PM 3 5 5:36 PM 6:20 PM 5 6 5:37 PM 6:21 PM 3 7 5:48 PM 6:32 PM 5 8 5:49 PM 6:33 PM 3 2 6:00 PM 6:44 PM 5 1 6:01 PM 6:45 PM 3 4 6:12 PM 6:56 PM 5 3 6:13 PM 6:57 PM 3 6 6:24 PM 7:08 PM 5 5 6:25 PM 7:09 PM 3 8 6:36 PM 7:20 PM 5 7 6:37 PM 7:21 PM 3 1 6:48 PM 7:32 PM 5 2 6:49 PM 7:33 PM 3 3 7:00 PM 7:44 PM 5 4 7:01 PM 7:45 PM 3 5 7:12 PM 7:56 PM 5 6 7:13 PM 7:57 PM 3 7 7:24 PM 8:08 PM 5 8 7:25 PM 8:09 PM 3 2 7:36 PM 8:20 PM 5 1 7:37 PM 8:21 PM 3 4 7:48 PM 8:32 PM 5 3 7:49 PM 8:33 PM 3 6 8:00 PM 8:44 PM 5 5 8:01 PM 8:45 PM 3 8 8:12 PM 8:56 PM 5 7 8:13 PM 8:57 PM 3 1 8:24 PM 9:08 PM 5 2 8:25 PM 9:09 PM 3 3 8:36 PM 9:20 PM 5 4 8:37 PM 9:21 PM 3 5 8:48 PM 9:32 PM 5 6 8:49 PM 9:33 PM 3 7 9:00 PM 9:44 PM 5 8 9:01 PM 9:45 PM 3 2 9:12 PM 9:56 PM 5 1 9:13 PM 9:57 PM 3 4 9:24 PM 10:08 PM 5 3 9:25 PM 10:09 PM 3 6 9:36 PM 10:20 PM 5 5 9:37 PM 10:21 PM 3 8 9:48 PM 10:32 PM 5 7 9:49 PM 10:33 PM :00 PM 10:44 PM :01 PM 10:45 PM :12 PM 10:56 PM :13 PM 10:57 PM :24 PM 11:08 PM :25 PM 11:09 PM :36 PM 11:20 PM :37 PM 11:21 PM :48 PM 11:32 PM :49 PM 11:33 PM :00 PM 11:44 PM :01 PM 11:45 PM :12 PM 11:56 PM Goes out of service 5 11:13 PM 11:57 PM Goes out of service 8 11:24 PM 12:08 AM Goes out of service 7 11:25 PM 12:09 AM Goes out of service 1 11:36 PM 12:20 AM Goes out of service 2 11:37 PM 12:21 AM Goes out of service 3 11:48 PM 12:32 AM Goes out of service 4 11:49 PM 12:33 AM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-28

109 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 3 Annual Vehicle Miles Weekday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Low Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Peak AM (6:00 8:59 AM) , Off Peak 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) , Peak PM (3:30 6:59 PM) , Off Peak 2 (7 12 AM) Total Weekday Veh Miles 5, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 1,371, Assumptions: Peak Headway = Every 4 minutes Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.7 miles one way Weekend/Holiday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Low Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Off Peak 1 (6 AM 12 AM) , Total Weekday Veh Miles 3, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 366, Assumptions: Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.7 miles one way Annual Veh. Miles (Total) 1,738, Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-29

110 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4 Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) 17.7 route miles End to End One Way Run Time (minutes) 44 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) 8 and 9 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 105 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off peak (minutes) 96 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 7.5 minutes Off Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 12 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 12 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM 9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM 3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM 7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM 12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 14 peak vehicles Number of Off Peak Vehicles Required 8 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 17 vehicles Number of Cars per Train Set for Peak Service? N/A Number of Cars per Train Set for Off Peak Service? N/A Total Number of Stations 18 stations Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 44,288 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 16,499 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 60,786 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 3,876 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 969,075 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 3,186 Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 366,390 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 1,335,465 Bold indicates direct input into O&M Model. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-30

111 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays AM Peak D-O Corridor - BRT "Low" Alternative Scenario 4 - Weekdays Weekdays one way run time from one way run time end to end 0:44 min from end to end 0:44 min AM Peak Period (6:00 AM 8:59 AM) 3 hours AM Peak period Depart UNC Depart Arrive UNC Layover at UNC Hospitals Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals (min) 105 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 1 6:00 AM 6:44 AM 8 2 6:00 AM 6:44 AM 8 1 6:00 AM 9:21 AM 3:21 3 6:07 AM 6:51 AM 9 4 6:07 AM 6:51 AM 9 2 6:00 AM 9:21 AM 3:21 5 6:15 AM 6:59 AM 8 6 6:15 AM 6:59 AM 8 3 6:07 AM 9:29 AM 3:22 7 6:22 AM 7:06 AM 9 8 6:22 AM 7:06 AM 9 4 6:07 AM 9:29 AM 3:22 9 6:30 AM 7:14 AM :30 AM 7:14 AM 8 5 6:15 AM 9:36 AM 3: :37 AM 7:21 AM :37 AM 7:21 AM 9 6 6:15 AM 9:36 AM 3: :45 AM 7:29 AM :45 AM 7:29 AM 8 7 6:22 AM 8:51 AM 2:29 2 6:52 AM 7:36 AM 9 1 6:52 AM 7:36 AM 9 8 6:22 AM 8:51 AM 2:29 4 7:00 AM 7:44 AM 8 3 7:00 AM 7:44 AM 8 9 6:30 AM 8:59 AM 2:29 6 7:07 AM 7:51 AM 9 5 7:07 AM 7:51 AM :30 AM 8:59 AM 2:29 8 7:15 AM 7:59 AM 8 7 7:15 AM 7:59 AM :37 AM 9:06 AM 2: :22 AM 8:06 AM 9 9 7:22 AM 8:06 AM :37 AM 9:06 AM 2: :30 AM 8:14 AM :30 AM 8:14 AM :45 AM 9:14 AM 2: :37 AM 8:21 AM :37 AM 8:21 AM :45 AM 9:14 AM 2:29 1 7:45 AM 8:29 AM 8 2 7:45 AM 8:29 AM 8 40:00:00 veh hrs during AM Peak 3 7:52 AM 8:36 AM 9 4 7:52 AM 8:36 AM 9 5 8:00 AM 8:44 AM 8 6 8:00 AM 8:44 AM 8 7 8:07 AM 8:51 AM 9 8 8:07 AM 8:51 AM 9 9 8:15 AM 8:59 AM Goes out of service 10 8:15 AM 8:59 AM Goes out of service 11 8:22 AM 9:06 AM :22 AM 9:06 AM :30 AM 9:14 AM Goes out of service 14 8:30 AM 9:14 AM Goes out of service 2 8:37 AM 9:21 AM 3 1 8:37 AM 9:21 AM 3 4 8:45 AM 9:29 AM 7 3 8:45 AM 9:29 AM 7 6 8:52 AM 9:36 AM Goes out of service 5 8:52 AM 9:36 AM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-31

112 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays Off Peak 1 8 9:00 AM 9:44 AM 4 7 9:00 AM 9:44 AM 4 96 Off Peak Period 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) 6.5 hours Off Peak period :12 AM 9:56 AM :12 AM 9:56 AM 4 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 1 9:24 AM 10:08 AM 4 2 9:24 AM 10:08 AM 4 1 9:24 AM 3:44 PM 6:20 3 9:36 AM 10:20 AM 4 4 9:36 AM 10:20 AM 4 2 9:24 AM 3:44 PM 6:20 7 9:48 AM 10:32 AM 4 8 9:48 AM 10:32 AM 4 3 9:36 AM 3:56 PM 6: :00 AM 10:44 AM :00 AM 10:44 AM 4 4 9:36 AM 3:56 PM 6: :12 AM 10:56 AM :12 AM 10:56 AM 4 7 9:00 AM 4:08 PM 7: :24 AM 11:08 AM :24 AM 11:08 AM 4 8 9:00 AM 4:08 PM 7: :36 AM 11:20 AM :36 AM 11:20 AM :12 AM 3:32 PM 6: :48 AM 11:32 AM :48 AM 11:32 AM :12 AM 3:32 PM 6: :00 AM 11:44 AM :00 AM 11:44 AM 4 52:16:00 Veh hrs during Off Peak :12 AM 11:56 AM :12 AM 11:56 AM :24 AM 12:08 PM :24 AM 12:08 PM :36 AM 12:20 PM :36 AM 12:20 PM :48 AM 12:32 PM :48 AM 12:32 PM :00 PM 12:44 PM :00 PM 12:44 PM :12 PM 12:56 PM :12 PM 12:56 PM :24 PM 1:08 PM :24 PM 1:08 PM :36 PM 1:20 PM :36 PM 1:20 PM :48 PM 1:32 PM :48 PM 1:32 PM 4 7 1:00 PM 1:44 PM 4 8 1:00 PM 1:44 PM :12 PM 1:56 PM :12 PM 1:56 PM 4 2 1:24 PM 2:08 PM 4 1 1:24 PM 2:08 PM 4 4 1:36 PM 2:20 PM 4 3 1:36 PM 2:20 PM 4 8 1:48 PM 2:32 PM 4 7 1:48 PM 2:32 PM :00 PM 2:44 PM :00 PM 2:44 PM 4 1 2:12 PM 2:56 PM 4 2 2:12 PM 2:56 PM 4 3 2:24 PM 3:08 PM 4 4 2:24 PM 3:08 PM 4 7 2:36 PM 3:20 PM 4 8 2:36 PM 3:20 PM :48 PM 3:32 PM :48 PM 3:32 PM 7 2 3:00 PM 3:44 PM :00 PM 3:44 PM :12 PM 3:56 PM 5 3 3:12 PM 3:56 PM 5 8 3:24 PM 4:08 PM 8 7 3:24 PM 4:08 PM 8 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-32

113 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays PM Peak 2 5 3:31 PM 4:15 PM 9 6 3:31 PM 4:15 PM 9 PM Peak Period (3:30 PM 6:59 PM) 3.5 hours PM Peak period 12 3:39 PM 4:23 PM :39 PM 4:23 PM 8 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 9 3:46 PM 4:30 PM :46 PM 4:30 PM 9 1 3:54 PM 7:15 PM 3:21 1 3:54 PM 4:38 PM 8 2 3:54 PM 4:38 PM 8 2 3:54 PM 7:15 PM 3:21 3 4:01 PM 4:45 PM 9 4 4:01 PM 4:45 PM 9 3 4:01 PM 7:23 PM 3: :09 PM 4:53 PM :09 PM 4:53 PM 8 4 4:01 PM 7:30 PM 3:29 7 4:16 PM 5:00 PM 9 8 4:16 PM 5:00 PM 9 5 3:31 PM 6:53 PM 3:22 6 4:24 PM 5:08 PM 8 5 4:24 PM 5:08 PM 8 6 3:31 PM 6:53 PM 3: :31 PM 5:15 PM :31 PM 5:15 PM 9 7 4:16 PM 7:38 PM 3: :39 PM 5:23 PM 8 9 4:39 PM 5:23 PM 8 8 4:16 PM 7:38 PM 3:22 2 4:46 PM 5:30 PM 9 1 4:46 PM 5:30 PM 9 9 3:46 PM 7:08 PM 3:22 4 4:54 PM 5:38 PM 8 3 4:54 PM 5:38 PM :46 PM 7:08 PM 3: :01 PM 5:45 PM :01 PM 5:45 PM :31 PM 7:00 PM 2:29 8 5:09 PM 5:53 PM 8 7 5:09 PM 5:53 PM :31 PM 7:00 PM 2:29 5 5:16 PM 6:00 PM 9 6 5:16 PM 6:00 PM :09 PM 7:30 PM 3: :24 PM 6:08 PM :24 PM 6:08 PM :09 PM 7:30 PM 3:21 9 5:31 PM 6:15 PM :31 PM 6:15 PM 9 45:25:00 veh hrs during PM Peak 1 5:39 PM 6:23 PM 8 2 5:39 PM 6:23 PM 8 3 5:46 PM 6:30 PM 9 4 5:46 PM 6:30 PM :54 PM 6:38 PM :54 PM 6:38 PM 8 7 6:01 PM 6:45 PM 9 8 6:01 PM 6:45 PM 9 6 6:09 PM 6:53 PM 8 5 6:09 PM 6:53 PM :16 PM 7:00 PM Goes out of service 12 6:16 PM 7:00 PM Goes out of service 10 6:24 PM 7:08 PM 5 9 6:24 PM 7:08 PM 5 2 6:31 PM 7:15 PM :31 PM 7:15 PM :39 PM 7:23 PM Goes out of service 3 6:39 PM 7:23 PM Goes out of service 14 6:46 PM 7:30 PM :46 PM 7:30 PM 7 8 6:54 PM 7:38 PM Goes out of service 7 6:54 PM 7:38 PM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-33

114 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekdays Off Peak 2 5 7:01 PM 7:45 PM 4 6 7:01 PM 7:45 PM 4 Off Peak Period 2 (7 PM 11:59 AM) 9 7:13 PM 7:57 PM :13 PM 7:57 PM 4 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 5 hours Off Peak period 2 1 7:25 PM 8:09 PM 4 2 7:25 PM 8:09 PM 4 1 7:25 PM 12:09 AM 4: :37 PM 8:21 PM :37 PM 8:21 PM 4 2 7:25 PM 12:09 AM 4:44 6 7:49 PM 8:33 PM 4 5 7:49 PM 8:33 PM 4 5 7:01 PM 12:33 AM 5: :01 PM 8:45 PM 4 9 8:01 PM 8:45 PM 4 6 7:01 PM 12:33 AM 5:32 2 8:13 PM 8:57 PM 4 1 8:13 PM 8:57 PM 4 9 7:13 PM 11:57 PM 4: :25 PM 9:09 PM :25 PM 9:09 PM :13 PM 11:57 PM 4:44 5 8:37 PM 9:21 PM 4 6 8:37 PM 9:21 PM :37 PM 12:21 AM 4:44 9 8:49 PM 9:33 PM :49 PM 9:33 PM :37 PM 12:21 AM 4:44 1 9:01 PM 9:45 PM 4 2 9:01 PM 9:45 PM 4 39:28:00 veh hrs during Off Peak :13 PM 9:57 PM :13 PM 9:57 PM 4 6 9:25 PM 10:09 PM 4 5 9:25 PM 10:09 PM :09:00 daily veh hours 10 9:37 PM 10:21 PM 4 9 9:37 PM 10:21 PM 4 44,288 annual veh hours (weekdays) 2 9:49 PM 10:33 PM 4 1 9:49 PM 10:33 PM :01 PM 10:45 PM :01 PM 10:45 PM 4 * Assumes 250 weekdays per year 5 10:13 PM 10:57 PM :13 PM 10:57 PM 4 AM/PM Peak 9 10:25 PM 11:09 PM :25 PM 11:09 PM 4 one way run time :37 PM 11:21 PM :37 PM 11:21 PM 4 layover time at terminal (both ends) :49 PM 11:33 PM :49 PM 11:33 PM 4 round trip cycle time :01 PM 11:45 PM :01 PM 11:45 PM 4 peak headway :13 PM 11:57 PM Goes out of service 9 11:13 PM 11:57 PM Goes out of service peak buses rqd :25 PM 12:09 AM Goes out of service 1 11:25 PM 12:09 AM Goes out of service 14 11:37 PM 12:21 AM Goes out of service 13 11:37 PM 12:21 AM Goes out of service Off Peak Pd 5 11:49 PM 12:33 AM Goes out of service 6 11:49 PM 12:33 AM Goes out of service one way run time 44 layover time at terminal (both ends) 8.5 round trip cycle time 96.5 off peak headway 12 off peak veh rqd 8.0 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-34

115 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4 Annual Revenue Train Hours Weekends/Holidays D-O Corridor - BRT "Low" Alternative Scenario 4 - Weekends one way run time from one way run time end to end 0:44 min from end to end 0:44 min Depart UNC Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Depart Vehicle # Alston Arrive UNC Hospitals Layover at UNC Hospitals (min) Weekends (6 AM 11:59 PM) 1 6:00 AM 6:44 AM 4 2 6:00 AM 6:44 AM 4 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 3 6:12 AM 6:56 AM 4 4 6:12 AM 6:56 AM 4 1 6:00 AM 12:20 AM 18:20 5 6:24 AM 7:08 AM 4 6 6:24 AM 7:08 AM 4 2 6:00 AM 12:20 AM 18:20 7 6:36 AM 7:20 AM 4 8 6:36 AM 7:20 AM 4 3 6:12 AM 12:32 AM 18:20 2 6:48 AM 7:32 AM 4 1 6:48 AM 7:32 AM 4 4 6:12 AM 12:32 AM 18:20 4 7:00 AM 7:44 AM 4 3 7:00 AM 7:44 AM 4 5 6:24 AM 11:56 PM 17:32 6 7:12 AM 7:56 AM 4 5 7:12 AM 7:56 AM 4 6 6:24 AM 11:56 PM 17:32 8 7:24 AM 8:08 AM 4 7 7:24 AM 8:08 AM 4 7 6:36 AM 12:08 AM 17:32 1 7:36 AM 8:20 AM 4 2 7:36 AM 8:20 AM 4 8 6:36 AM 12:08 AM 17:32 3 7:48 AM 8:32 AM 4 4 7:48 AM 8:32 AM :28:00 5 8:00 AM 8:44 AM 4 6 8:00 AM 8:44 AM 4 16,499 annual veh hours (weekends/holidays) 7 8:12 AM 8:56 AM 4 8 8:12 AM 8:56 AM 4 * Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year (115 days) 2 8:24 AM 9:08 AM 4 1 8:24 AM 9:08 AM 4 Weekends/Holidays* 4 8:36 AM 9:20 AM 4 3 8:36 AM 9:20 AM 4 one way run time :48 AM 9:32 AM 4 5 8:48 AM 9:32 AM 4 layover time at terminal (both ends) :00 AM 9:44 AM 4 7 9:00 AM 9:44 AM 4 round trip cycle time :12 AM 9:56 AM 4 2 9:12 AM 9:56 AM 4 off peak headway :24 AM 10:08 AM 4 4 9:24 AM 10:08 AM 4 off peak veh rqd :36 AM 10:20 AM 4 6 9:36 AM 10:20 AM 4 7 9:48 AM 10:32 AM 4 8 9:48 AM 10:32 AM 4 Annual Veh Hours (total) 60, :00 AM 10:44 AM :00 AM 10:44 AM :12 AM 10:56 AM :12 AM 10:56 AM :24 AM 11:08 AM :24 AM 11:08 AM :36 AM 11:20 AM :36 AM 11:20 AM :48 AM 11:32 AM :48 AM 11:32 AM :00 AM 11:44 AM :00 AM 11:44 AM :12 AM 11:56 AM :12 AM 11:56 AM :24 AM 12:08 PM :24 AM 12:08 PM :36 AM 12:20 PM :36 AM 12:20 PM :48 AM 12:32 PM :48 AM 12:32 PM :00 PM 12:44 PM :00 PM 12:44 PM :12 PM 12:56 PM :12 PM 12:56 PM :24 PM 1:08 PM :24 PM 1:08 PM :36 PM 1:20 PM :36 PM 1:20 PM :48 PM 1:32 PM :48 PM 1:32 PM 4 7 1:00 PM 1:44 PM 4 8 1:00 PM 1:44 PM 4 2 1:12 PM 1:56 PM 4 1 1:12 PM 1:56 PM 4 4 1:24 PM 2:08 PM 4 3 1:24 PM 2:08 PM 4 6 1:36 PM 2:20 PM 4 5 1:36 PM 2:20 PM 4 8 1:48 PM 2:32 PM 4 7 1:48 PM 2:32 PM 4 1 2:00 PM 2:44 PM 4 2 2:00 PM 2:44 PM 4 3 2:12 PM 2:56 PM 4 4 2:12 PM 2:56 PM 4 5 2:24 PM 3:08 PM 4 6 2:24 PM 3:08 PM 4 7 2:36 PM 3:20 PM 4 8 2:36 PM 3:20 PM 4 2 2:48 PM 3:32 PM 4 1 2:48 PM 3:32 PM 4 4 3:00 PM 3:44 PM 4 3 3:00 PM 3:44 PM 4 6 3:12 PM 3:56 PM 4 5 3:12 PM 3:56 PM 4 8 3:24 PM 4:08 PM 4 7 3:24 PM 4:08 PM 4 1 3:36 PM 4:20 PM 4 2 3:36 PM 4:20 PM 4 3 3:48 PM 4:32 PM 4 4 3:48 PM 4:32 PM 4 5 4:00 PM 4:44 PM 4 6 4:00 PM 4:44 PM 4 7 4:12 PM 4:56 PM 4 8 4:12 PM 4:56 PM 4 2 4:24 PM 5:08 PM 4 1 4:24 PM 5:08 PM 4 4 4:36 PM 5:20 PM 4 3 4:36 PM 5:20 PM 4 6 4:48 PM 5:32 PM 4 5 4:48 PM 5:32 PM 4 8 5:00 PM 5:44 PM 4 7 5:00 PM 5:44 PM 4 1 5:12 PM 5:56 PM 4 2 5:12 PM 5:56 PM 4 3 5:24 PM 6:08 PM 4 4 5:24 PM 6:08 PM 4 5 5:36 PM 6:20 PM 4 6 5:36 PM 6:20 PM 4 7 5:48 PM 6:32 PM 4 8 5:48 PM 6:32 PM 4 2 6:00 PM 6:44 PM 4 1 6:00 PM 6:44 PM 4 4 6:12 PM 6:56 PM 4 3 6:12 PM 6:56 PM 4 6 6:24 PM 7:08 PM 4 5 6:24 PM 7:08 PM 4 8 6:36 PM 7:20 PM 4 7 6:36 PM 7:20 PM 4 1 6:48 PM 7:32 PM 4 2 6:48 PM 7:32 PM 4 3 7:00 PM 7:44 PM 4 4 7:00 PM 7:44 PM 4 5 7:12 PM 7:56 PM 4 6 7:12 PM 7:56 PM 4 7 7:24 PM 8:08 PM 4 8 7:24 PM 8:08 PM 4 2 7:36 PM 8:20 PM 4 1 7:36 PM 8:20 PM 4 4 7:48 PM 8:32 PM 4 3 7:48 PM 8:32 PM 4 6 8:00 PM 8:44 PM 4 5 8:00 PM 8:44 PM 4 8 8:12 PM 8:56 PM 4 7 8:12 PM 8:56 PM 4 1 8:24 PM 9:08 PM 4 2 8:24 PM 9:08 PM 4 3 8:36 PM 9:20 PM 4 4 8:36 PM 9:20 PM 4 5 8:48 PM 9:32 PM 4 6 8:48 PM 9:32 PM 4 7 9:00 PM 9:44 PM 4 8 9:00 PM 9:44 PM 4 2 9:12 PM 9:56 PM 4 1 9:12 PM 9:56 PM 4 4 9:24 PM 10:08 PM 4 3 9:24 PM 10:08 PM 4 6 9:36 PM 10:20 PM 4 5 9:36 PM 10:20 PM 4 8 9:48 PM 10:32 PM 4 7 9:48 PM 10:32 PM :00 PM 10:44 PM :00 PM 10:44 PM :12 PM 10:56 PM :12 PM 10:56 PM :24 PM 11:08 PM :24 PM 11:08 PM :36 PM 11:20 PM :36 PM 11:20 PM :48 PM 11:32 PM :48 PM 11:32 PM :00 PM 11:44 PM :00 PM 11:44 PM :12 PM 11:56 PM Goes out of service 5 11:12 PM 11:56 PM Goes out of service 8 11:24 PM 12:08 AM Goes out of service 7 11:24 PM 12:08 AM Goes out of service 1 11:36 PM 12:20 AM Goes out of service 2 11:36 PM 12:20 AM Goes out of service 3 11:48 PM 12:32 AM Goes out of service 4 11:48 PM 12:32 AM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-35

116 Bus Rapid Transit Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor BRT Low Scenario 4Annual Vehicle Miles Weekday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Low Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Peak AM (6:00 8:59 AM) Off Peak 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) , Peak PM (3:30 6:59 PM) Off Peak 2 (7 12 AM) Total Weekday Veh Miles 3, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 969, Assumptions: Peak Headway = Every 7.5 minutes Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.7 miles one way Weekend/Holiday Durham Orange County Corridor (BRT Low Scenario Passenger Capacity) Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Off Peak 1 (6 AM 12 AM) , Total Weekday Veh Miles 3, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 366, Assumptions: Off Peak Headway = Every 12 minutes Alignment length = 17.7 miles one way Annual Veh. Miles (Total) 1,335, Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-BRT-36

117 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates VOLUME 3 SECTION B TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (TSM) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATES DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Prepared for TRIANGLE TRANSIT Prepared by URS TEAM July 2011 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-i

118 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction METHODOLOGY COST CATEGORIES TSM Service Plan O&M Cost Items and Units of Service Productivity Ratios and Unit Costs O&M Cost Model and Results... 3 APPENDIX A: OPERATING STATISTICS... 6 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2 1: O&M COST CATEGORIES AND ASSOCIATED COST ITEMS... 2 TABLE 2 2: DURHAM ORANGE COUNTY TSM ALTERNATIVE SERVICE PLAN... 2 TABLE 2 3: UNITS OF SERVICE FOR TSM ALTERNATIVE... 2 TABLE 2 4: TSM ALTERNATIVE ANNUAL O&M COST ESTIMATE (2011 DOLLARS)... 4 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-ii

119 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates 1. Introduction This report documents the operating and maintenance (O&M) cost methodology, assumptions, and estimates for the Transportation Systems Management (TSM) alternative for the Durham Orange Corridor of the Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis study. 2. Methodology The introduction of expanded bus service proposed under the TSM Alternative will result in annual operating and maintenance costs. The costs of providing expanded bus service under the TSM Alternative will occur in terms of the following functions: Vehicle operations; Vehicle maintenance and fuel; Maintenance of way; Maintenance of stations; General Administration Other costs; and Transit Security and Safety. To estimate the operations and maintenance costs associated with the TSM Alternative, a cost allocation operating and maintenance model was developed to calculate the costs associated with this new service. A cost allocation model assumes that the expenses incurred in providing transit service are driven by key service variables such as annual revenue vehicle hours, total vehicles, annual revenue vehicle miles, route miles, and stations. For each expense line item, service variables are multiplied by unit costs and productivity ratios (for labor expenses) to calculate the costs for each expense line item. For the purposes of developing these cost estimates, Triangle Transit s Actual 2010 Bus Operations budget was used as a basis for cost items related to vehicle operations, vehicle maintenance, general administration, and casualty and insurance. It is assumed that a TSM Alternative would have similar needs and cost structure as the existing bus system in the Triangle Region in terms of salaries for operators and mechanics, costs of materials, etc. However, for certain cost categories, where the TSM would be more analogous to BRT and light rail, such as in terms of park andride stations, revenue collection, and transit security, it was assumed that O&M costs for the TSM alternative would be comparable to the BRT and LRT alternatives; therefore the same unit costs for these categories were used in the TSM O&M cost model. The following sections describe the components used to develop the O&M cost model and results Cost Categories The cost categories for the O&M cost model that were used to estimate the operating and maintenance costs for the BRT alternatives include: Vehicle Operations: Annual costs associated with vehicle operations such as operator wages, materials and supplies (i.e., uniforms, licenses, tags and fees), and "Other" expenses representing costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs; Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel: Annual costs associated with fuel as well as costs related to vehicle maintenance such as wages for mechanics, service attendants, parts & inventory coordinator and assistants, vehicle maintenance materials and supplies (i.e., spare parts, lubricants, tools, cleaning supplies, service and maintenance contracts, uniforms/protective clothing maintenance staff, etc.), and "Other" expenses representing costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs; Maintenance of Park and Rides: Annual costs associated with Park and Ride maintenance, such as graffiti removal, park and ride utilities (electricity and water), repairs, and materials for park and rides. General Administration: Costs associated with vehicle supervision (i.e., salaries for Road Supervisors, Dispatchers, and Maintenance Supervisors) and administrative costs related to Human Resources, Finance, Administrative Services, EEO, and "Other" expenses representing costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs; Other Costs: Costs associated with casualty and insurance, and revenue collection including the maintenance and servicing of ticket vending machines at stations. Transit Security and Safety: Annual Costs associated with the enforcement of safety and security on vehicles and at park and ride lots, transit facilities, and garages. The first step in developing the O&M cost model was to develop cost categories and to assign associated cost items as shown in Table 2 1. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-1

120 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 1: O&M Cost Categories and Associated Cost Items Cost category Cost item Vehicle Operations Operators Materials and Supplies Other Costs Vehicle Maintenance and Power Consumption Fuel and Lubricants Mechanics Service Attendants Parts & Inventory Coordinator Parts & Inventory Assistant Materials and Supplies Other Costs Park and Ride Maintenance Park-and-Ride Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe Materials and Supplies Other Costs Casualty and Insurance Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe6 Revenue Collection General Administration Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe General Administration Insurance TSM Service Plan A service plan defining the operation of the Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative was created and used in the calculation of units of service which were inputted into the O&M cost model. Table 2 2 lists the operating assumptions for TSM Alternative O&M Cost Items and Units of Service Next, for each of the O&M cost items, a unit of service (i.e., service variable) was calculated and assigned as shown in Tables 2 3. Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours represent the total number of hours during one year in which vehicles operate during revenue service (i.e., the time in which the vehicles are available for travel by the general public). The number of vehicle hours is closely related to operations labor costs since it is a function of the amount of time the vehicle is in operation. This operating statistic is also used as an input in estimating transit security and safety as security needs to be provided while the vehicles are in operation. In addition, it is used as an input in calculating insurance costs because it represents the time that vehicles are in operation and at risk for accidents. Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles represents the mileage vehicles travel during one year in revenue service. Vehicle miles are used in estimating fuel costs, vehicle maintenance materials and supplies, and indirect vehicle maintenance costs because they are sensitive to changes in the level of service (i.e., if service is added or more vehicles are operated, then costs associated with propulsion, materials and supplies, and indirect and indirect vehicle maintenance needs increase accordingly.) Total vehicles represent the total number of the vehicles in the fleet, including spare vehicles. This operating statistic is used as an input in calculating vehicle maintenance labor costs (i.e., mechanics, service attendants, parts and inventory staff, etc.) because the numbers of staff need to maintain vehicles are directly related to the number of vehicles in the fleet. It is also used for calculating Supervision costs and General Administration costs because it is assumed that as the fleet grows in size then the costs associated with these items increase accordingly. Table 2 2: Durham Orange County TSM Alternative Service Plan Operating Assumptions Alignment Length (route miles) EB and WB route miles End-to-End One-Way Run Time (minutes) 57 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) during Peak 16 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (each end) during Off Peak 26 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 130 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off-peak (minutes) 140 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 10 minutes Off-Peak Headways (weekdays) - minutes 20 minutes Weekend Headways 20 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM-9AM) 18 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM-3:30PM) 3 hours PM Peak (3:30PM-7PM) 6.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM-12AM) 3.5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 13 peak vehicles Number of Off-Peak Vehicles Required 7 off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 16 vehicles Total Number of Park-and-Rides 8 Park-and-Rides Route Miles represent the total distance of the alignment between terminal stations. Similar to total cars, this operating statistic is used as an input in calculating maintenance of way costs because this cost is directly related to the length of the alignment. Similar to the BRT and light rail alternatives, for the TSM alternative, it is assumed that park and ride maintenance would be performed by private companies under contract to Triangle Transit or the operator of the TSM bus services. This arrangement follows the structure used by CATS for its light rail system. For the purposes of the O&M model, park and ride maintenance costs reflect the associated costs of materials, supplies and contracted services. The following table lists the units of service used as input into the O&M cost model. Table 2 3: Units of Service for TSM Alternative Unit of Service Quantity Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 54,181 Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 945,047 Total Number of Vehicles in Fleet (including spare 16 vehicles) Route Miles EB and WB Park-and-Rides 8 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-2

121 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Productivity Ratios and Unit Costs Productivity ratios describe how labor varies with service levels. A productivity ratio represents the number of a particular resource needed to provide one unit of service (e.g., the number of mechanics per revenue vehicle mile). Unit costs represent labor wages and benefits as well costs of materials. Productivity ratios and unit costs for the TSM Alternative were developed based on the Actual 2010 Budget, staffing levels, and salary data for Triangle Transit bus operations. The unit costs were inflated by one percent to account for general rise in costs of services and goods between 2010 and 2011 dollars. The Consumer Price Index was used as the source for this inflation rate. Unit costs in the O&M cost model represent the various costs associated with the TSM Alternative. These include: vehicle operations labor, materials, supplies, and indirect or other costs; vehicle maintenance labor, materials, supplies, and other costs and fuel costs; maintenance of way costs; park and ride maintenance materials, supplies and services; general administration and supervision costs; casualty/insurance and revenue collection costs; and transit safety and security labor, administrative and insurance costs associated with the enforcement of safety and security on vehicles and at park and ride lots, and transit facilities O&M Cost Model and Results A spreadsheet based O&M cost model was developed to estimate annual costs by cost item. The O&M cost model calculates costs using the following equations: Annual O&M expense (for labor costs) = (unit of service) * (productivity ratio) * (unit cost) Annual O&M expense (for non labor costs) = (unit of service) * (unit cost) Based on the service plans defined for the Durham Orange County TSM, the annual O&M costs is 8,899,627 in 2011 dollars. The costs for the TSM Alternative are presented in Table 2 4. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-3

122 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Table 2 4: TSM Alternative Annual O&M Cost Estimate (2011 Dollars) Cost Item Unit Of Service Type Productivity Ratio Unit Cost FTE Annual Cost Vehicle Operations Operators 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L Employees/Rev. Veh. Hr 47,168 /Employee ,641,386 Materials and Supplies 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours M /Revenue Vehicle Hour 59,013 Other Costs 2 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Revenue Vehicle Hour 479,535 Subtotal 3,179,934 Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel Fuel and Lubricants 945,047 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 559, Mechanics 16 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 62,853 /Employee 3 188,559 Service Attendants 16 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 42,414 /Employee 2 84,828 Parts & Inventory Coordinator 16 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 66,477 /Employee 1 66,477 Parts & Inventory Assistant 16 Total number of vehicles in fleet L Employees/Total buses 49,100 /Employee 1 49,100 Materials and Supplies 945,047 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles M /Rev. Veh. Mile 244,698 Other Costs 945,047 Annual Revenue Vehicle Miles 0.25 /Rev. Veh. Mile 237,570 Subtotal 1,430,273 Park and Ride Maintenance Park and Ride Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services 3 8 Park and Rides M - 51,510 /Park and Ride 412,080 Subtotal 412,080 General Administration Vehicle Supervision - Salary and Fringe 4 16 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 8,318 /Vehicle 133, Materials and Supplies 16 Total number of vehicles in fleet - 2,758 /Vehicle 44, Subtotal 177,226 Other Casualty and Insurance 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Veh. Mile 391,834 Revenue Collection Salary and Fringe 5 8 Park and Rides L - 12,169 /Station 97, Revenue Collection General Administration 8 Park and Rides - 8,167 /Station 65, Subtotal 554,524 Transit Security and Safety Salary and Fringe 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours L /Rev. Train Hr 615,811 General Administration 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 2,501,308 Insurance 54,181 Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours /Rev. Train Hr 28,471 Subtotal 3,145,590 Grand Total 8,899,627 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-4

123 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Footnotes: 1- All salaries per employee shown are average annual salaries for that position and pay grades, and include fringe benefits. 2 All "Other" costs represent costs associated with meeting expenses, other office services and materials, travel and transportation, communications, printing and reproduction, non vehicle related repairs and maintenance, other services, leased equipment, services and maintenance contracts, janitorial and other services, rental of real property, and indirect costs. 3 It is assumed that park and ride costs for the TSM alternative would be comparable to the station maintenance costs of the BRT and LRT alternatives; therefore the same unit costs were used. Station Maintenance Materials, Supplies and Contracted Services includes costs associated with graffiti removal, Miscellaneous HVAC, utilities (water and electricity costs), contracted services (landscape management) costs, janitorial services, Miscellaneous Repairs/Services (Shelters and Stops), and Miscellaneous supplies (Shelters and Stops). 4 Includes salaries for Vehicle Supervision including Road Supervisors, Dispatchers, and Maintenance Supervisors. 5 It assumed that revenue collection costs for TSM alternative would be comparable to the BRT and LRT alternatives; therefore the same unit costs were used. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-5

124 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Appendix A: Operating Statistics Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative Operating Statistics Alignment Length (route miles) EB and WB route miles Average Operating Speed (mph) mph End to End One Way Run Time (minutes) 57 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (peak) 16 minutes Layover Time at Terminals (off peak) 26 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during peak (minutes) 130 minutes Round Trip Cycle time during off peak (minutes) 140 minutes Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 10 minutes Off Peak Headways (weekdays) minutes 20 minutes Weekend Headways or Frequency 20 minutes Number of Days Per Year Service is operated 365 days per year Span of Service Weekdays from 6AM to 12AM 18 hours AM Peak (6AM 9AM) 3 hours Off Peak 1 (9AM 3:30PM) 6.5 hours PM Peak (3:30PM 7PM) 3.5 hours Off Peak 2 (7PM 12AM) 5 hours Number of Peak Vehicles Required 13 peak vehicles Number of Off Peak Vehicles Required 7off peak vehicles Spare Ratio (20% of peak vehicle requirement) 3 spare vehicles Total Fleet Size 16 vehicles Number of Cars per Train Set for Peak Service? N/A Number of Cars per Train Set for Off Peak Service? N/A Total Number of Park and Rides 8 P&Rs Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 39,875 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Daily) Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 14,306 per year Total Revenue Vehicle Hours (Annual) 54,181 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 2,825 Total Weekday Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 706,335 Assumes 250 weekdays per year Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Daily) 2,076 Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays Total Weekend Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 238,712 per year Total Revenue Vehicle Miles (Annual) 945,047 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-6

125 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative Annual Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekdays one way run time from end to end 0:57 min one way run time from end to end 0:57 min AM Peak Period (6:00 AM 8:59 AM) 3 hours AM Peak period Depart UNC Depart Arrive UNC Layover at UNC Hospitals Vehicle # Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Alston Hospitals (min) Veh # begin end total hrs in service 1 6:00 AM 6:57 AM 8 2 6:05 AM 7:02 AM 8 1 6:00 AM 9:07 AM 3:07 3 6:10 AM 7:07 AM 8 4 6:15 AM 7:12 AM 8 2 6:05 AM 9:12 AM 3:07 5 6:20 AM 7:17 AM 8 6 6:25 AM 7:22 AM 8 3 6:10 AM 9:17 AM 3:07 7 6:30 AM 7:27 AM 8 8 6:35 AM 7:32 AM 8 4 6:15 AM 9:22 AM 3:07 9 6:40 AM 7:37 AM :45 AM 7:42 AM 8 5 6:20 AM 9:27 AM 3: :50 AM 7:47 AM :55 AM 7:52 AM 8 6 6:25 AM 9:32 AM 3: :00 AM 7:57 AM 8 1 7:05 AM 8:02 AM 8 7 6:30 AM 9:37 AM 3:07 2 7:10 AM 8:07 AM 8 3 7:15 AM 8:12 AM 8 8 6:35 AM 9:42 AM 3:07 AM Peak 4 7:20 AM 8:17 AM 8 5 7:25 AM 8:22 AM 8 9 6:40 AM 9:47 AM 3:07 6 7:30 AM 8:27 AM 8 7 7:35 AM 8:32 AM :45 AM 9:52 AM 3:07 8 7:40 AM 8:37 AM 8 9 7:45 AM 8:42 AM :50 AM 8:52 AM 2: :50 AM 8:47 AM :55 AM 8:52 AM :55 AM 8:57 AM 2: :00 AM 8:57 AM :05 AM 9:02 AM Goes out of service 13 7:00 AM 9:02 AM 2:02 1 8:10 AM 9:07 AM Goes out of service 2 8:15 AM 9:12 AM 8 37:16:00 veh hrs during AM Peak 3 8:20 AM 9:17 AM 8 4 8:25 AM 9:22 AM Goes out of service 5 8:30 AM 9:27 AM Goes out of service 6 8:35 AM 9:32 AM 8 7 8:40 AM 9:37 AM 8 8 8:45 AM 9:42 AM Goes out of service 9 8:50 AM 9:47 AM Goes out of service 10 8:55 AM 9:52 AM Goes out of service Off Peak Period 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) 6.5 hours Off Peak period :00 AM 9:57 AM :05 AM 10:02 AM 18 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 2 9:20 AM 10:17 AM 8 3 9:25 AM 10:22 AM :20 AM 4:02 PM 6:42 6 9:40 AM 10:37 AM 8 7 9:45 AM 10:42 AM :25 AM 4:17 PM 6: :00 AM 10:57 AM :05 AM 11:02 AM :40 AM 4:22 PM 6: :20 AM 11:17 AM :25 AM 11:22 AM :45 AM 3:22 PM 5: :40 AM 11:37 AM :45 AM 11:42 AM :00 AM 3:37 PM 5: :00 AM 11:57 AM :05 AM 12:02 PM :00 AM 3:42 PM 6: :20 AM 12:17 PM :25 AM 12:22 PM :05 AM 3:57 PM 6: :40 AM 12:37 PM :45 AM 12:42 PM 18 45:04:00 Veh hrs during Off Peak 1 Off Peak :00 PM 12:57 PM :05 PM 1:02 PM :20 PM 1:17 PM :25 PM 1:22 PM :40 PM 1:37 PM :45 PM 1:42 PM :00 PM 1:57 PM 8 6 1:05 PM 2:02 PM :20 PM 2:17 PM 8 8 1:25 PM 2:22 PM :40 PM 2:37 PM :45 PM 2:42 PM :00 PM 2:57 PM 8 3 2:05 PM 3:02 PM :20 PM 3:17 PM 8 7 2:25 PM 3:22 PM :40 PM 3:37 PM :45 PM 3:42 PM 18 PM Peak Period (3:30 PM 6:59 PM) 3.5 hours PM Peak period 12 3:00 PM 3:57 PM 8 2 3:05 PM 4:02 PM 18 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 3 3:20 PM 4:17 PM 8 6 3:25 PM 4:22 PM 8 1 3:30 PM 7:42 PM 4:12 1 3:30 PM 4:27 PM 8 4 3:35 PM 4:32 PM 8 2 4:20 PM 7:27 PM 3:07 7 3:40 PM 4:37 PM 8 8 3:45 PM 4:42 PM 8 3 4:25 PM 7:32 PM 3:07 5 3:50 PM 4:47 PM 8 9 3:55 PM 4:52 PM 8 4 3:35 PM 7:47 PM 4: :00 PM 4:57 PM :05 PM 5:02 PM 8 5 3:50 PM 6:57 PM 3: :10 PM 5:07 PM :15 PM 5:12 PM 8 6 4:30 PM 7:37 PM 3:07 2 4:20 PM 5:17 PM 8 3 4:25 PM 5:22 PM 8 7 3:40 PM 7:52 PM 4:12 6 4:30 PM 5:27 PM 8 1 4:35 PM 5:32 PM 8 8 3:45 PM 6:52 PM 3:07 4 4:40 PM 5:37 PM 8 7 4:45 PM 5:42 PM 8 9 3:55 PM 7:02 PM 3:07 8 4:50 PM 5:47 PM 8 5 4:55 PM 5:52 PM :10 PM 7:17 PM 3:07 9 5:00 PM 5:57 PM :05 PM 6:02 PM :00 PM 7:07 PM 3:07 PM Peak 12 5:10 PM 6:07 PM :15 PM 6:12 PM :05 PM 7:12 PM 3: :20 PM 6:17 PM 8 2 5:25 PM 6:22 PM :15 PM 7:22 PM 3:07 3 5:30 PM 6:27 PM 8 6 5:35 PM 6:32 PM 43:46:00 veh hrs during PM Peak 1 5:40 PM 6:37 PM 8 4 5:45 PM 6:42 PM 8 7 5:50 PM 6:47 PM 8 8 5:55 PM 6:52 PM Goes out of service 5 6:00 PM 6:57 PM Goes out of service 9 6:05 PM 7:02 PM :10 PM 7:07 PM :15 PM 7:12 PM :20 PM 7:17 PM Goes out of service 13 6:25 PM 7:22 PM Goes out of service 2 6:30 PM 7:27 PM 8 3 6:35 PM 7:32 PM 8 6 6:40 PM 7:37 PM Goes out of service 1 6:45 PM 7:42 PM Goes out of service 4 6:50 PM 7:47 PM 8 7 6:55 PM 7:52 PM 8 9 7:10 PM 8:07 PM :15 PM 8:12 PM :30 PM 8:27 PM 8 2 7:35 PM 8:32 PM :50 PM 8:47 PM 8 4 7:55 PM 8:52 PM 18 Off Peak Period 2 (7 PM 11:59 AM) 7 8:10 PM 9:07 PM 8 9 8:15 PM 9:12 PM 18 Veh # begin end total hrs in service 5 hours Off Peak period :30 PM 9:27 PM :35 PM 9:32 PM :35 PM 12:07 AM 4:32 2 8:50 PM 9:47 PM 8 3 8:55 PM 9:52 PM :50 PM 12:12 AM 4:22 4 9:10 PM 10:07 PM 8 7 9:15 PM 10:12 PM :55 PM 12:27 AM 4:32 Off Peak 2 9 9:30 PM 10:27 PM :35 PM 10:32 PM :10 PM 12:32 AM 4: :50 PM 10:47 PM 8 2 9:55 PM 10:52 PM :10 PM 12:47 AM 5: :10 PM 11:07 PM :15 PM 11:12 PM :15 PM 12:52 AM 5: :30 PM 11:27 PM :35 PM 11:32 PM :30 PM 11:52 PM 4: :50 PM 11:47 PM :55 PM 11:52 PM Goes out of service 33:24:00 veh hrs during Off Peak :10 PM 12:07 AM Goes out of service 3 11:15 PM 12:12 AM Goes out of service 4 11:30 PM 12:27 AM Goes out of service 7 11:35 PM 12:32 AM Goes out of service :30:00 daily veh hours 9 11:50 PM 12:47 AM Goes out of service 11 11:55 PM 12:52 AM Goes out of service 39,875 annual veh hours (weekdays * Assumes 250 weekdays per year Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-7

126 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates one way run time from endto end 0:57 min Vehicle # Depart UNC Hospitals Arrive Alston Layover at Alston (min) Vehicle # Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative Revenue Vehicle Hours Weekends/Holidays one way run time from endto end 0:57 min one way run time 57 Depart Alston Arrive UNC Hospitals Layover at UNC Hospitals (min) layover time at terminal (both ends) :00 AM 6:57 AM 8 2 6:05 AM 7:02 AM 18 round trip cycle time :20 AM 7:17 AM 8 4 6:25 AM 7:22 AM 18 peak headway :40 AM 7:37 AM 8 6 6:45 AM 7:42 AM 18 peak buses rqd :00 AM 7:57 AM 8 1 7:05 AM 8:02 AM :20 AM 8:17 AM 8 3 7:25 AM 8:22 AM 18 Off Peak Pd 4 7:40 AM 8:37 AM 8 5 7:45 AM 8:42 AM 18 one way run time :00 AM 8:57 AM 8 7 8:05 AM 9:02 AM 18 layover time at terminal (both ends) :20 AM 9:17 AM 8 2 8:25 AM 9:22 AM 18 round trip cycle time :40 AM 9:37 AM 8 4 8:45 AM 9:42 AM 18 off peak headway :00 AM 9:57 AM 8 6 9:05 AM 10:02 AM 18 off peak veh rqd :20 AM 10:17 AM 8 1 9:25 AM 10:22 AM :40 AM 10:37 AM 8 3 9:45 AM 10:42 AM :00 AM 10:57 AM :05 AM 11:02 AM 18 Weekends (6 AM 11:59 PM) begin end total hrs in service 6 10:20 AM 11:17 AM :25 AM 11:22 AM 18 Veh # 1 10:40 AM 11:37 AM :45 AM 11:42 AM :00 AM 12:22 AM 18: :00 AM 11:57 AM :05 AM 12:02 PM :05 AM 12:37 AM 18: :20 AM 12:17 PM :25 AM 12:22 PM :20 AM 12:42 AM 18: :40 AM 12:37 PM :45 AM 12:42 PM :25 AM 11:42 PM 17: :00 PM 12:57 PM :05 PM 1:02 PM :40 AM 11:57 PM 17: :20 PM 1:17 PM :25 PM 1:22 PM :45 AM 12:02 AM 17: :40 PM 1:37 PM :45 PM 1:42 PM :00 AM 12:17 AM 17:17 1 1:00 PM 1:57 PM 8 2 1:05 PM 2:02 PM :24:00 3 1:20 PM 2:17 PM 8 4 1:25 PM 2:22 PM 18 14,306 annual veh hours (weekends/holidays) 5 1:40 PM 2:37 PM 8 6 1:45 PM 2:42 PM :00 PM 2:57 PM 8 1 2:05 PM 3:02 PM 18 * Assumes 105 Saturday and Sundays and 10 major holidays per year (115 days) 2 2:20 PM 3:17 PM 8 3 2:25 PM 3:22 PM 18 Weekends/Holidays* 4 2:40 PM 3:37 PM 8 5 2:45 PM 3:42 PM 18 one way run time :00 PM 3:57 PM 8 7 3:05 PM 4:02 PM 18 layover time at terminal (both ends) :20 PM 4:17 PM 8 2 3:25 PM 4:22 PM 18 round trip cycle time :40 PM 4:37 PM 8 4 3:45 PM 4:42 PM 18 off peak headway :00 PM 4:57 PM 8 6 4:05 PM 5:02 PM 18 off peak veh rqd 7 7 4:20 PM 5:17 PM 8 1 4:25 PM 5:22 PM 18 Annual Veh Hours (total) 54, :40 PM 5:37 PM 8 3 4:45 PM 5:42 PM :00 PM 5:57 PM 8 5 5:05 PM 6:02 PM :20 PM 6:17 PM 8 7 5:25 PM 6:22 PM :40 PM 6:37 PM 8 2 5:45 PM 6:42 PM :00 PM 6:57 PM 8 4 6:05 PM 7:02 PM :20 PM 7:17 PM 8 6 6:25 PM 7:22 PM :40 PM 7:37 PM 8 1 6:45 PM 7:42 PM :00 PM 7:57 PM 8 3 7:05 PM 8:02 PM :20 PM 8:17 PM 8 5 7:25 PM 8:22 PM :40 PM 8:37 PM 8 7 7:45 PM 8:42 PM :00 PM 8:57 PM 8 2 8:05 PM 9:02 PM :20 PM 9:17 PM 8 4 8:25 PM 9:22 PM :40 PM 9:37 PM 8 6 8:45 PM 9:42 PM :00 PM 9:57 PM 8 1 9:05 PM 10:02 PM :20 PM 10:17 PM 8 3 9:25 PM 10:22 PM :40 PM 10:37 PM 8 5 9:45 PM 10:42 PM :00 PM 10:57 PM :05 PM 11:02 PM :20 PM 11:17 PM :25 PM 11:22 PM :40 PM 11:37 PM :45 PM 11:42 PM Goes out of service 5 11:00 PM 11:57 PM Goes out of service 6 11:05 PM 12:02 AM Goes out of service 7 11:20 PM 12:17 AM Goes out of service 1 11:25 PM 12:22 AM Goes out of service 2 11:40 PM 12:37 AM Goes out of service 3 11:45 PM 12:42 AM Goes out of service Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-8

127 TSM Alternative Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative Revenue Vehicle Miles Weekday Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Peak AM (6:00 8:59 AM) Off Peak 1 (9 AM 3:29 PM) Peak PM (3:30 6:59 PM) Off Peak 2 (7 12 AM) Total Weekday Veh Miles 2, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 706, Assumptions: Peak Headway = Every 10 minutes Off Peak Headway = Every 20 minutes Alignment length = miles EB WB Weekend/Holiday Durham Orange County Corridor TSM Alternative Service Hours One Way Round Trip Veh Period Per Svce Pd Trips per Hour Cycle Miles Miles Off Peak 1 (6 AM 12 AM) , Total Weekday Veh Miles 2, Annualization Factor Annual Weekday Veh Miles 238, Assumptions: Off Peak Headway = Every 20 minutes Alignment length = miles EB WB Annual Veh. Miles (Total) 945, Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 B-TSM-9

128 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis Travel Time and Distance Calculations

129 Travel Time and Distance Calculations VOLUME 3 SECTION C TRAVEL TIME and DISTANCE CALCULATIONS DURHAM-ORANGE COUNTY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Prepared for TRIANGLE TRANSIT Prepared by URS TEAM July 2011 Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-i

130 Travel Time and Distance Calculations LIST OF TABLES TABLE C 1 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS... 2 SUMMARY FOR ALL ALTERNATIVES TABLE C 2 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 3 OPTION A1, C1 AND D3 MEADOWMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (E) TABLE C 3 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 4 OPTION A3, C1 AND D3 MEADOWMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (E) TABLE C 4 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 5 OPTION A1, C2 AND D3 WOODMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (E) TABLE C 5 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 6 OPTION A3, C2 AND D3 WOODMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (E) TABLE C 6 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 7 OPTION A1, C1 AND D1 MEADOWMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (W) TABLE C 7 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 8 OPTION A3, C1 AND D1 MEADOWMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (W) TABLE C 8 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED)... 9 OPTION A1, C2 AND D1 WOODMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (W) TABLE C 9 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) OPTION A3, C2 AND D1 WOODMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (W) TABLE C 10 TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE CALCULATIONS (CONTINUED) OPTION A3, C2 AND D3 WOODMONT AND SOUTH SQUARE (E) Introduction This report documents the travel time and distance calculations for the Durham Orange Corridor of the Triangle Transit Alternatives Analysis study. The travel time calculation is based on acceleration and deceleration formulae. The speed is restricted in accordance with the speed restrictions as indicated on the plan and profile drawings. The results were also reviewed for total cruise distance between accelerating and decelerating to reflect how the system would actually be operated. Since the production of these tables, there have been updates to the plan and profile drawings and the speed limits for the horizontal and vertical curves have improved. This was not taken into account and can be considered to be travel time contingency. The station dwell time was set at 20 seconds which is common for light rail systems. For light rail, the acceleration and deceleration rate of 3 mphps was used as recommended in the FTA website and this is consistent with the operating characteristics of modern LRT vehicles. For bus rapid transit, an acceleration and deceleration rate of 2 mphps was used. Added time was inserted in the calculations for the areas of mixed traffic running to account for added delay. A detailed calculation was performed for the BRT High alternative. The BRT Low alternative was then calculated within Table C 1 taking into account the change in route length, running speed and added mixed traffic operations to arrive at the total travel time. Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-1

131 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 1 Travel Time and Distance Calculation Summary for all Alternatives Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-2

132 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 2 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-3

133 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 3 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-4

134 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 4 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-5

135 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 5 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-6

136 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 6 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-7

137 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 7 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-8

138 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 8 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-9

139 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 9 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-10

140 Travel Time and Distance Calculations Table C 10 Travel Time and Distance Calculations (continued) Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis July 2011 C-11