AAMA THERMAL PERFORMANCE REPORT. Rendered to: US ALUMINUM INC., DIVISION OF CR LAURENCE CO., INC.

Transcription

1 Archi t ectural Testing THERMAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Rendered to: US ALUMINUM INC., DIVISION OF CR LAURENCE CO., INC. SERIES/MODEL: S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) TYPE: Swinging Door - Double Report No: Report Date: 02/21/ A Scotsville Road Suite 390 B Rochester, NY phone: fax:

2 Archi t ectural Testing THERMAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Rendered to: US ALUMINUM INC., DIVISION OF CR LAURENCE CO., INC. 200 Singleton Drive Waxahachie, Texas Report No: Report Date: 02/21/13 Simulation Date: 02/21/13 Project Summary:, Inc. was contracted by US Aluminum Inc., Division of CR Laurence Co., Inc. to provide U-Factor and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient thermal performance ratings on the S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) Swinging Door - Double. The thermal performance ratings were determined in accordance with, Standard Practice for Determining the Thermal Performance Characteristics of Fenestration Systems Installed in Commercial Reference Documents:, Standard Practice for Determining the Thermal Performance Characteristics of Fenestration Systems Installed in Commercial Buildings NFRC , Procedure for Determining Fenestration Product U-Factors NFRC , Procedure for Determining Fenestration Product Solar Heat Gain Coefficient and Visible Transmittance at Normal Incidence Simulation Specimen Description: Series/Model: S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) Type: Swinging Door - Double Frame Material: Aluminum Thermally Broken Framing System Material Finish: Painted Aluminum Specimen Size: 1920mm wide by 2090mm high (75-1/2" by 82-3/8") Configuration: Two vision lites separated by one intermediate vertical Drawing Reference: US Aluminum Drawings MU thru -04, dated 12/11/ A Scotsville Road Suite 390 B Rochester, NY phone: fax:

3 Page 2 of 10 US Aluminum Inc., Division of CR Laurence Co., Inc. S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) - Swinging Door - Double System U-Factor vs. Percentage of Vision Area COG U-Factor Vision Area / Total Area (%) Note: 1 inch Overall - Dual Glazed Glass (0.47- COG) with Aluminum Spacer, Dual Glazed Glass with Heat Mirror (0.18- COG) with Aluminum Spacer

4 Page 3 of 10 US Aluminum Inc., Division of CR Laurence Co., Inc. S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) - Swinging Door - Double System SHGC vs. Percentage of Vision Area COG SHGC Vision Area / Total Area (%) System VT vs. Percentage of Vision Area COG VT Vision Area / Total Area (%)

5 Page 4 of 10 US Aluminum Inc., Division of CR Laurence Co., Inc. S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) - Swinging Door - Double Size Specific U-Factor Matrix* Glazing Option Center of Glass U-Factor Overall U-Factor Note: 1 inch Overall - Dual Glazed Glass (0.47- COG) with Aluminum Spacer, Dual Glazed Glass with Heat Mirror (0.18- COG) with Aluminum Spacer

6 Page 5 of 10 US Aluminum Inc., Division of CR Laurence Co., Inc. S80 Bi-Fold Door (1" Dual Glazed) - Swinging Door - Double Size Specific SHGC Matrix* Size Specific VT Matrix* Center of Glass SHGC Overall SHGC Center of Glass VT Overall VT *Size Specific U-Factor, SHGC, and VT Matrices are based on the standard Swinging Door - Double specimen size of 1920mm wide by 2090mm high (75-1/2" by 82-3/8"). This represents 68.4% Vision Area / Total Area.

7 Head Head Head Head Head Head Head Head Head Vision Area Data 60% Vision Area 58.04" by Total Product U-Factor NFRC " Page 6 of " 82.28" " by 85% Vision Area " by

8 Vision Area Data Total Product U-Factor Page 7 of 10 60% NFRC 85% Vision Area Vision Area 58.04" 75.59" " by by by 63.18" 82.28" " Head Head Head Head Head Head Head Head Head

9 Vision Area Data Total Product U-Factor Page 8 of 10 60% NFRC 85% Vision Area Vision Area 58.04" 75.59" " by by by 63.18" 82.28" " Head Head

10 Page 9 of 10 will service this report for the entire test record retention period. Test records that are retained such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of test specimens, or other pertinent project documentation will be retained by, Inc. for the entire test record retention period. The test record retention end date for this report is February 21, Results obtained are simulated values and were secured by using the designated test methods. This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. It is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and relates only to the product simulated. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of, Inc. For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, INC.: SIMULATED BY: REVIEWED BY: Gurminder Virk Simulation Engineer Kevin S. Louder Project Engineer GV:GV Attachments (pages): This report is complete only when all attachments listed are included. Appendix A: Drawings and Bills of Material (6)