Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006
|
|
- Flora Nichols
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006 Further details regarding the target translation 18 th December 2013 John Norris Project manager (Ricardo-AEA) Stefan Hausberger Task 1 & 2 leader (TUG)
2 2 Contents 1. Project objective 2. Overview of target translation options 3. Option 1 advantages and disadvantages 4. Option 1 high level view on methodology 5. Option 2 advantages and disadvantages 6. Option 2 high level view on methodology 7. Conclusions and discussion
3 3 Project objective To develop a methodology for translating between the current NEDC-based fleet average CO 2 targets, and the associated utility function formulae, into targets of comparable stringency for CO 2 emissions measured using the WLTP Quantitative evaluation of the options from whole fleet and manufacturers and experts perspectives. For some options this will involve translating the current short and long term car and van targets and their formulae for into equivalent target levels and formulae for CO 2 emissions measured using the WLTP
4 4 Overview of the target translation options Option 1: Maintain NECD based targets Option 2: Introduce WLTP based targets Translating the fleet target Translating the specific emission target formulae Option 3: Mixed approach
5 Option 1: Maintain NEDC based targets - Advantages and disadvantages Advantages: For short/medium term, i.e. during the transition period, confirms the existing regulations on CO 2 targets. Legislation linked to the CO 2 targets at different levels remains valid. Examples: European reporting and monitoring requirements, national (e.g. UK vehicle tax bands) and local (e.g. CO 2 based charge exemptions) levels. Disadvantages: The WLTP will be introduced and the conversion from NEDC to WLTP will be required at some date in the future. Technical data monitored and reported will need to be expressed in comparable NEDC values. If NEDC targets remain after the introduction of WLTP then robust WLTP to NEDC translation methodology will be required. 5
6 6 Option 1: Maintain NEDC based targets - Possible methodology Outputs required: For data for which WLTP data is measured, i.e. new models for the first year from WLTP introduction date, outputs required are: equivalent NEDC CO 2 emissions, and vehicle reference mass (for manufacturers specific emissions targets) Methodology for providing outputs: Either the output data required will be included in the vehicle s Certificate of Conformity, and included in monitoring & reporting return to EEA; or meta-models will be used to translate WLTP CO 2 emissions to equivalent NEDC CO 2 emissions value.
7 Option 1: Maintain NEDC based targets - Possible methodology Calculations to be performed: For whole fleet average CO 2 value: The NEDC CO 2 emissions data (generated from the translated WLTP measurement) to be summed, weighted with the registration data, and averaged along with other NEDC CO 2 emissions data to give the whole fleet average For manufacturer specific emissions targets: The NEDC CO 2 emissions data (generated from the translated WLTP measurement) and the NEDC vehicle reference mass to be summed, weighted with the registration data as at present, to give the manufacturer average specific emissions. Key issues: Provision of acceptable accuracy with a reasonable administrative burden 7
8 8 Option 2: Introduce WLTP targets generally Advantages and disadvantages Advantages: At some time in the future all light duty vehicles will be type approved using the WLTP (drive cycle and test procedure). Translation of CO 2 emissions targets provides clarity regarding the future target. Disadvantages: All options involving the translation of NEDC CO 2 emissions targets into equivalent WLTP targets, based principally on the meta-models, will need to address the challenges of: Stakeholder acceptance of the translation methodology that the models provide acceptable accuracy, and Ensuring comparable stringency of targets.
9 9 Option 2: Introduce WLTP targets Sub-options Translating the NEDC fleet targets (Options 2(a)): Option 2(a)(i) - Direct translation of short term based on NEDC CO 2 emissions targets for one or more reference years; Option 2(a)(ii) - Translation of long term targets Option 2(a)(ii)(1) Using direct translation, as for Option 2(a)(i) Option 2(a)(ii)(2) Using direct translation, as for Option 2(a)(i), but including consideration of the evolution of the power trains (fuels) and technologies Translating the slope of the NEDC CO2 emission target curve, affecting manufacturer specific emissions targets (Option 2(b)): Option 2(b)(i,ii)(1) - Direct translation of the NEDC emission target formulae; Option 2(b)(ii)(2) - Adjustment of the NEDC emission target formulae so as to minimise change for manufacturers.
10 10 Option 2(a)(i) & Option 2(a)(ii)(1) - Direct translation of NEDC short and long term CO 2 emissions targets using and reference year s registrations profile Advantages: It is based on objective registrations data (Monitoring and reporting database for 2012) and meta-models for the CO 2 emissions translation Targets can be defined now, i.e. when the correlation exercise has been successfully completed, with no assumptions required regarding future technologies
11 11 Option 2(a)(i) & Option 2(a)(ii)(1) - Direct translation of NEDC targets Disadvantages and challenges: Takes no account of evolution of the power trains (fuels) and technologies that might be used to meet the NEDC based targets Needs to either a) be able to link each row of data in the CO 2 vehicle monitoring database with the appropriate meta-model to deduce WLTP CO 2 value from the declared NEDC CO 2 value, or b) aggregate rows of registrations data from within the CO 2 vehicle monitoring database to generate consolidated database, which is then translated. Will need to predict a WLTP CO 2 emissions value with little further data than that available in the CO 2 vehicle monitoring database. Will translate and transfer some NEDC optimisation across to the new WLTP targets
12 12 Option 2(a)(i) & Option 2(a)(ii)(1) - Direct translation of NEDC targets - Possible methodology Outputs required: Translated NEDC CO 2 emissions for vehicle models for which WLTP data is not measured (i.e. currently all vehicles sold). Methodology for providing outputs: Use either the meta-models or correlation functions, to translate NEDC CO 2 emissions value into equivalent WLTP value. Either: Line by line (of the monitoring and reporting database) translation, or By the aggregation of lines in the monitoring and reporting database and then translating these aggregates of data. Anticipated that the key function will be the ratio of the NEDC/WLTP CO 2 emissions, not differences, and that the ratio will be applied to the NEDC CO 2 value to generate the equivalent WLTP CO 2 value.
13 13 Option 2(a)(i) & Option 2(a)(ii)(1) - Direct translation of NEDC targets - Possible methodology CO 2 emissions for passenger cars Average CO 2 emissions for WLTP for reference year CO 2 (WLTP) Reference year CO 2 emissions (g/km) Average CO 2 emissions for NEDC for reference year CO 2 (NEDC) Reference year WLTP translated 95 g/km NEDC target 95 g/km NEDC target Translated target(wltp) = 95 x CO 2 (WLTP) Reference year CO 2 (NEDC) Reference year And equivalent equation for 130 g/km 2015 target
14 14 Option 2(a)(ii)(2) - Direct translation of NEDC CO 2 & include effect of technology evolution Advantages: Combines being based on objective registrations data and includes future technology evolution Option is based on objective registrations data (Monitoring and reporting database for 2012) and meta-models for the CO 2 emissions translation
15 15 Option 2(a)(ii)(2) - Direct translation of NEDC CO 2 & include effect of technology evolution Disadvantages and challenges: Starting point would be the direct translation of NEDC to WLTP CO 2 emissions for reference year using the meta-models therefore the challenges discussed for Option 2(a)(ii)(1) relating the appropriate metamodel to each row of data in the CO 2 vehicle monitoring database remain. Will require a projection quantifying how the power trains (fuels) and technologies that manufacturers are planning to use to meet the NEDC based targets will evolve Will also require meta-models to estimate impact of new technologies on NEDC & WLTP CO 2 emissions, possibly on very little physical data. Will translate some NEDC optimisation to be transferred across to the translated WLTP targets
16 16 Option 2(a)(ii)(2) - Direct translation of NEDC CO 2 & include effect of technology evolution Possible methodology Outputs required: Translated NEDC CO 2 emissions for vehicle models for which WLTP data is not measured (i.e. currently all vehicles sold), Agreed list of future technologies to be included, and estimate of effect of new technologies on NEDC & WLTP CO 2 emissions A fleet averaged Technology Factor multiplier to quantify the effect of technology evolution.
17 Option 2(a)(ii)(2) - Direct translation of NEDC CO 2 & include effect of technology evolution Possible methodology Methodology for providing outputs: Assume only relevant for longer term targets (not short term targets); Use directly translated target from Option 2(a)(ii)(1) as starting point; Obtain view from manufacturers and experts regarding what additional technology penetration and evolution will occur by 2020 relative to the baseline year, to what extent and to which vehicle categories it will be applied; Using meta-models/correlation functions establish effect of emerging technologies on both NEDC and WLTP CO 2 emissions For those emerging technologies where there is a difference between the NEDC and WLTP CO 2 emissions: 17 Segment reference year database into vehicle categories, and gauge to what extent the emerging vehicle technologies are already being used; Using the proportion of all registrations of that vehicle category as proportion of all registrations, and the difference between the NEDC and WLTP CO 2 emissions calculate a technology factor (TechFac)
18 18 Option 2(a)(ii)(2) - Direct translation of NEDC CO 2 & include effect of technology evolution Possible methodology CO 2 emissions for reference year for passenger cars CO 2 emissions (g/km) WLTP translated 95 g/km NEDC target Average CO 2 emissions for WLTP for reference year CO 2 (WLTP) Reference year Average CO 2 emissions for WLTP for reference year after making allowance for technology evolution Average CO 2 emissions for NEDC for reference year CO 2 (NEDC) Reference year Average CO 2 emissions for NEDC for reference year after making allowance for technology evolution Technology adjusted WLTP translated 95 g/km NEDC target 95 g/km NEDC target Key equation: WLTP Target (Option 2(a)(ii)(1)) = TechFac x WLTP Target (Option 2(a)(i)(1)) In illustration technology adjusted WLTP target increases because effect of emerging technologies give larger CO 2 reduction for NEDC than for WLTP
19 19 Options 2(b) Translating the specific emission target formulae
20 20 Option 2(b)(i) - Direct translation of NEDC emission target formulae Advantages: Is simple, being directly based on the overall target factors Can be used for Option 2(a)(i) & Option 2(a)(ii)(1) simple directly translated targets Option 2(a)(ii)(2) Directly translated targets including some consideration of the evolution of technologies Disadvantages: Challenge of translating the NEDC mass to WLTP test mass Might not minimise change for manufacturers when taken together
21 21 Option 2(b)(i) - Direct translation of NEDC emissions target formulae Outputs required: Values of the two key parameters in the specific emissions target formulae (e.g. as given in Annex 1 of Regulation EC/443/2009) Specific emissions of CO 2 = a x (M M 0 ) i.e. translated value for the gradient (a) And for the vehicle reference mass, which in Regulation EC/443/2009 is the mass in running order (as defined in Directive 2007/47/EC)
22 22 Option 2(b)(i) - Direct translation of NEDC emissions target formulae Methodology for providing outputs: For gradient of emissions target formulae (a) For passenger cars the relationships between the NEDC emissions target formulae (Reg EC/443/2009 and EC COM/2012/393) are: Gradient (parameter a ) changes by factor of 95/130, i.e. ratio of fleet average targets, and Reference mass (parameter M 0 ) is currently unaltered. Methodology for this option is to apply the same changes to the gradient that mirror those calculated for the changes in fleet targets I.e. if overall long term target for passenger cars goes from 95 g/km to Y g/km the revised gradient would go from g/km/kg to x Y g/km/kg.
23 23 Option 2(b)(i) - Direct translation of NEDC emissions target formulae Methodology for providing outputs: For vehicle reference mass of emissions target formulae (M 0 ) Possible options are: Retain the NEDC Vehicle mass definition given in Directive 2007/47/EC and develop translation algorithm between the WLTP test mass (which will be a value between TM L and TM H for each vehicle sold in for a model depending on the range of equipment fitted) and Vehicle mass as defined in Directive 2007/47/EC, (For this option M 0 would not need to change), Translate the NEDC Vehicle mass into an equivalent WLTP value through analysing the correlation between the WLTP vehicle test mass and the value of the NEDC Vehicle mass that applies to the vehicle (For this option the revised M 0 would be translated from its current value by the amount indicated from the correlation WLTP vehicle test mass and the value of the NEDC Vehicle mass )
24 24 Option 2(b)(ii) Adjust the NEDC emission target formulae to minimise change Advantages: Is designed to minimise systematic change For example, if the technologies used by the manufacturers of heavier vehicles were less effective at CO 2 emissions reduction over WLTP than NEDC, relative to the technologies used by the manufacturers of heavier vehicles, then no change in gradient would lead to the manufacturers of heavier vehicles having to work disproportionately harder to meet the targets. An appropriate increase in the slope would minimise this, to some extent. Could also minimise systematic change caused by the change in definition of vehicle mass between NEDC and WLTP I.e. caused by change in scale of mass axis. However, adjustment of slope to improve manufacturer to manufacturer comparable stringency will not impact directly on overall emissions target.
25 25 Option 2(b)(ii) Adjust the NEDC emission target formulae to minimise change Disadvantages: Is more complex than a simple change of gradient Challenge of translating the NEDC mass to WLTP test mass
26 26 Option 2(b)(ii) - Adjust the NEDC emission target formulae to minimise change Outputs required: Values of the two key parameters in the specific emissions target formulae (e.g. as given in Annex 1 of Regulation EC/443/2009) Specific emissions of CO 2 = a x (M M 0 ) i.e. translated value for the gradient (a) And for the vehicle reference mass, which in Regulation EC/443/2009 is the mass in running order (as defined in Directive 2007/47/EC
27 27 Option 2(b)(ii) - Adjust the NEDC emission target formulae to minimise change Methodology for providing outputs: For gradient of emissions target formulae (a) The relative changes in manufacturers distances to the target are analysed, and it is seen whether adjusting the slope of the gradient can reduce the changes caused by the introduction of the WLTP. I.e. function to be minimised = S Changes in differences from the target lines Manufacturers An illustrative example might help explain this.
28 28 Option 2(b)(ii) - Adjust the NEDC emission target formulae to minimise change CO 2 emissions (g/km) M1 + x + x Scaled NEDC target formulae rescaled to average WLTP CO2 emissions and adjusted to minimise change M3 Scaled NEDC target formulae rescaled to average WLTP CO2 emissions M2 + x + x + x + x + x + x M4 + x M5 + Scaled NEDC target formulae as specified in Regulation 411/2009/EC x Vehicle mass (kg) 1,372
29 29 Option 2(b)(ii) - Adjust the NEDC emission target formulae to minimise change Manufacturer NEDC WLTP Av CO 2 Diff from target line Av CO 2 Diff from target line Change in Diff from target lines Revised change in Diff from target lines Manufacturer xxxx Manufacturer xxxx Manufacturer xxxx Manufacturer xxxx Manufacturer xxxx
30 30 Option 3: Mixed approach Advantages and disadvantages Advantages: As for Option 1 for the transition period For short/medium term, i.e. during the transition period, confirms the existing regulatory framework. Legislation linked to the CO 2 targets at European (e.g. reporting and monitoring requirements), national (e.g. UK vehicle tax bands) and local (e.g. CO 2 based charge exemptions) levels remain valid. As for Option 2 following the introduction of WLTP The WLTP will be introduced and the conversion from NEDC to WLTP will be required at some date in the future Range of sub-options available for simple direct translation of targets, including consideration of technology evolution, and reducing the effects of NEDC testing rather than technology optimisation
31 31 Option 3: Mixed approach Advantages and disadvantages Disadvantages: It would be wrong to indicate that the mixed approach has no disadvantages. However, some disadvantages noted, e.g. for Option 1 that the WLTP will be introduced at some point and sticking with NEDC base target translation will be required at some date in the future, are substantially reduced by this option. Many of the challenges noted for Option 2(a) will remain and need to be addressed.
32 32 Conclusions and discussion Three different translation options have been presented: Option 1: Maintain NECD based targets Option 2: Introduce WLTP based targets Translating the fleet target Translating the specific emission target formulae Option 3: Mixed approach At a high level, do you agree these three options cover the scope of the target translation options adequately? At a more detailed level do the sub-options and the possible methodologies cover the scope of the target translation options adequately?
33 Thank you John Norris Ricardo-AEA Ltd The Gemini Building Fermi Avenue Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR T: E: W: +44 (0)
Ricardo-AEA. Passenger car and van CO 2 regulations stakeholder meeting. Sujith Kollamthodi 23 rd May
Ricardo-AEA Data gathering and analysis to improve understanding of the impact of mileage on the cost-effectiveness of Light-Duty vehicles CO2 Regulation Passenger car and van CO 2 regulations stakeholder
More informationApproach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles
Approach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles Brussels, 17 May 2013 richard.smokers@tno.nl norbert.ligterink@tno.nl alessandro.marotta@jrc.ec.europa.eu Summary
More informationSupport for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles
Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles and #3 for - No, Maarten Verbeek, Jordy Spreen ICCT-workshop, Brussels, April 27, 2012 Objectives of projects Assist European Commission
More informationProportion of the vehicle fleet meeting certain emission standards
The rate of penetration of new technologies is highly correlated with the average life-time of vehicles and the average age of the fleet. Estimates based on the numbers of cars fitted with catalytic converter
More informationNOx reduction effect on CO 2. NOX Reductions are achievable without significant penalties in CO 2
NOx reduction effect on CO 2 NOX Reductions are achievable without significant penalties in CO 2 Source (ICCT): http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/euro-viversus-6_icct_briefing_06012017.pdf
More informationEuropean Urban Transport Roadmaps to 2030
European Urban Transport Roadmaps to 2030 A policy support tool for small and medium size cities Dr Guy Hitchcock Ricardo-AEA www.ricardo-aea.com Overview of the project Project launched by DG MOVE to:
More informationCost-Benefit Analysis of Options for Certification, Validation and Monitoring and Reporting of HDVs
CO 2 HDV Stakeholder Meeting Cost-Benefit Analysis of Options for Certification, Validation and Monitoring and Reporting of HDVs Leif-Erik Schulte Vicente Franco Brussels, January, 30 th 2015 1 Overview
More informationPresentation to the RDE LDV working group on RDE th March 2017
Presentation to the RDE LDV working group on RDE 4 by OECVA 10 th March 2017 The WAV Market Europe has an ageing population. We are living longer, but enduring a greater number of years in poor health
More informationDG CLIMA studies on CO2 emissions from vehicles
DG CLIMA studies on CO2 emissions from vehicles KICK-OFF MEETING of ERMES Group 22-23 June 2010 Bruxelles Fabio Dalan DG CLIMA, Unit C2 Current areas of activities Passenger cars - Regulation (EC) 443/2009
More informationNEDC/WLTP correlation process
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Correlation workshop, Ispra, 15 May 2017 1 Why the correlation procedure? With WLTP CO2 emission values increase on average but impact differs between different manufacturers:
More informationThe right utility parameter mass or footprint (or both)?
January 2013 Briefing The right utility parameter mass or footprint (or both)? Context In 2009, the EU set legally-binding targets for new cars to emit 130 grams of CO 2 per kilometer (g/km) by 2015 and
More informationUpdate on the development of the WLTP and its implementation into the EU legislation
GFEI Workshop on In-use Fuel Economy Update on the development of the WLTP and its implementation into the EU legislation London, 16 July 2014 Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer
More informationTransposition of GTR15 (WLTP) into EU Legislation and UN Regulations
Informal document No. GRPE-72-18 (72 nd GRPE, 11-15 January 2016, agenda item 3(b)) Transposition of GTR15 (WLTP) into EU Legislation and UN Regulations 72 nd GRPE January 2016 Submitted by the expert
More informationThe Automotive Industry
WLTP AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY GUIDE WLTP GUIDANCE FOR The Automotive Industry NEDC WLTP Executive Summary The purpose of this guide is to provide an overview of WLTP and its transition into UK policy and consumer
More informationQ&A ON EMISSIONS TESTING
Q&A ON EMISSIONS TESTING 1. How does ACEA react to the VW situation?... 1 2. How does the current lab test work?... 1 3. Why are there differences between the lab tests and real-world emissions?... 3 4.
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 120/4 Official Journal of the European Union 1.5.2013 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 397/2013 of 30 April 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards
More informationHDV CO2 emission certification 1 st meeting of the Editing board
HDV CO2 emission certification 1 st meeting of the Editing board DG Growth Maciej Szymański 2.03.2015 Internal market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Meeting agenda Work of the Editing board: Objectives
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
10.1.2019 L 8 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2019/26 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to
More informationSupporting Analysis regarding Test Procedure Flexibilities and Technology Deployment for Review of the Light Duty Vehicle CO 2 Regulations
THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY AN EXTERNAL CONTRACTOR AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE COMMISSION S VIEW Supporting Analysis regarding Test Procedure Flexibilities and Technology Deployment for
More informationSupporting Analysis regarding Technology Deployment and Test Procedure Flexibilities for Review of the Light Duty Vehicle CO 2 Regulations
1 Supporting Analysis regarding Technology Deployment and Test Procedure Flexibilities for Review of the Light Duty Vehicle CO 2 Regulations, September 10 th, 2012. Service Request #6 under Framework Contract
More informationECOMP.3.A EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 ENT 229 MI 914 ENV 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 T 229 MI 914 V 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS
More informationTechnical Committee Motor Vehicles 15 September RDE 3 discussion
Technical Committee Motor Vehicles 15 September 2016 RDE 3 discussion 1 RDE-LDV working group meetings on RDE-3 in 2016 23 January (launch) 20 April 17, 18 May 1 June (cold start web) 2 June (hybrid web)
More informationThe state-of-play of the NEDC/WLTP Correlation project
Meeting of the Technical Working Group on Correlation (TWG) The state-of-play of the NEDC/WLTP Correlation project Brussels 27 November 2014 Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer
More informationTransition To WLTP Facilitating Changes in Low Carbon Car Policy and Car Buyer Information
Transition To WLTP Facilitating Changes in Low Carbon Car Policy and Car Buyer Information Gloria Esposito, Head of Projects FleetNet Conference, Wednesday 17 th May 2017 Low Carbon Low Vehicle Partnership
More informationCorrection of test cycle tolerances: assessing the impact on CO 2 results. J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo
Correction of test cycle tolerances: assessing the impact on CO 2 results J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2 nd Act November 10, 2016 Agenda Flexibilities of test cycle and laboratory procedures
More informationRevision of Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities for ship generated waste and cargo residues
Revision of Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities for ship generated waste and cargo residues Making the EU legal framework fit for purpose Seventh HELCOM Cooperation Platform on PRF in the
More informationTransposition of GTR15 (WLTP) into UN Regulations. Update from WLTP Transposition Task Force
Informal document GRPE-75-18 75 th GRPE, 6-9 June 2017 Agenda item 3(b) Transposition of GTR15 (WLTP) into UN Regulations Update from WLTP Transposition Task Force 1 Background Transpose GTR15 into UNR
More informationWLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle
WLTP DHC subgroup Date 30/10/09 Title Working paper number Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle WLTP-DHC-02-05 1.0. Introduction This paper sets out the methodology that will be used to generate
More informationContribution to the RDE working group
RDE testing of hybrid vehicles Contribution to the RDE working group 20 April 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC) IET - Institute for Energy and Transport Sustainable Transport Unit
More informationDepartment for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit Values of Time and Operating Costs
Department for Transport Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit 3.5.6 Values of Time and Operating Costs September 2006 1 Contents 1. Values of Time and Operating Costs 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Values
More informationWLTP. Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class
WLTP Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification Heinz Steven 06.04.2013 1 Introduction The
More informationComments on the Consultation Paper on Standards and Labelling of Fuel Consumption in Cars
Comments on the Consultation Paper on Standards and Labelling of Fuel Consumption in Cars --- Anumita Roychowdhury Centre for Science and Environment Public consultation Bureau of Energy Efficiency New
More informationAECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project. AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015
AECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015 Contents Background Test Programme Vehicle description & test regime. Baseline
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.12.2016 C(2016) 8383 final COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of 19.12.2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1628 of the European Parliament and of the Council
More informationA comparison of the impacts of Euro 6 diesel passenger cars and zero-emission vehicles on urban air quality compliance
A comparison of the impacts of Euro 6 diesel passenger cars and zero-emission vehicles on urban air quality compliance Introduction A Concawe study aims to determine how real-driving emissions from the
More informationWLTP. The Impact on Tax and Car Design
WLTP The Impact on Tax and Car Design Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicle Testing Procedure (WLTP) The impact on tax and car design The Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicle Testing Procedure (WLTP) is set
More informationCEMA position on draft braking regulation, 4 June 2008 ENTR/F1/ /rev16
CEMA PT16 N05Rev CEMA position on draft braking regulation, 4 June 2008 ENTR/F1/5030-99/rev16 CEMA is the European association representing the agricultural machinery industry. It represents the industry
More informationSubject: ACEA proposal for Euro 6 OBD and Euro 6 PN limit for gasoline direct injection engines.
Subject: for Euro 6 OBD and Euro 6 PN limit for gasoline direct injection engines. Amendments to Regulations 715/007 (1) Regulation 566/011 (3) and 69/008 (), as amended by Note: ACEA s initial comments
More informationREAL WORLD DRIVING. Fuel Efficiency & Emissions Testing. Prepared for the Australian Automobile Association
REAL WORLD DRIVING Fuel Efficiency & Emissions Testing Prepared for the Australian Automobile Association - 2016 2016 ABMARC Disclaimer By accepting this report from ABMARC you acknowledge and agree to
More informationCOATING YOUR WAY TO LOWER EMISSIONS
COATING YOUR WAY TO LOWER EMISSIONS With vehicle production growing annually and manufacturers under pressure to reduce exhaust emissions, new and innovative methods will have to be found to increase engine
More informationACEA RDE Cold Start. 30 th August 2016
ACEA RDE Cold Start 30 th August 2016 CONTENT Introduction Cold start calculation method : approach 0 vs approach 2a Factor Cold Start (Fcs): proportional factor to integrate the severity of soaking temperature
More informationMonitoring the CO 2 emissions from new passenger cars in the EU: summary of data for 2010
Monitoring the CO 2 emissions from new passenger cars in the EU: summary of data for 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EEA has collected data submitted by Member States on vehicle registrations in the year 2010,
More informationMeasurement methods for skid resistance of road surfaces
Measurement methods for skid resistance of road surfaces Presented by Martin Greene (TRL) and Veronique Cerezo (IFSTTAR) 11 October 2016 Background and requirements for Common Scale 1 Background Measurement
More informationCalibration. DOE & Statistical Modeling
ETAS Webinar - ASCMO Calibration. DOE & Statistical Modeling Injection Consumption Ignition Torque AFR HC EGR P-rail NOx Inlet-cam Outlet-cam 1 1 Soot T-exhaust Roughness What is Design of Experiments?
More informationCOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2017) XXX draft COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of XXX on the use of fuel consumption and CO 2 emission values type-approved and measured in accordance with the World Harmonised
More informationAEBS and LDWS Exemptions Feasibility Study: 2011 Update. MVWG Meeting, Brussels, 6 th July 2011
AEBS and LDWS Exemptions Feasibility Study: 2011 Update MVWG Meeting, Brussels, 6 th July 2011 Contents Background Method and assumptions Effectiveness estimates Cost estimates Cost Benefit Analyses Results
More informationRevision of the EU Green Public Procurement Criteria for Transport
Revision of the EU Green Public Procurement Criteria for Transport Joint comments from T&E and EEB to the 3 rd draft of the JRC technical report and GPP criteria proposal 19 March 2018 Contact Yoann Le
More informationDeveloping a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS
Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS 1 Working Paper No. HDH-10-05 (10th HDH meeting, 05 June 2012) Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based
More informationVehicle Emissions Remote Sensing Preliminary results from Measurements on A472 Hafod Road
Vehicle Emissions Remote Sensing Preliminary results from Measurements on A472 Hafod Road Rebecca Rose WAQF, 12 th October 2017 2 Hafod-yr-ynys Roadside monitoring station Annual mean concentration of
More informationResearch funded by The Department for Transport
Light Goods Vehicle CO 2 Emissions Study: Final report. Summarising findings from all tasks Framework Ref: PPRO 04/045/004 (Lot 2) Contract undertaken by AEA Technology Gemini Building Didcot, Oxfordshire,
More informationOBLIGATION TO FIT ISOFIX ANCHORAGES. (Discussion paper)
111th Session of the MOTOR VEHICLE WORKING GROUP 5 July 2006 OBLIGATION TO FIT ISOFIX ANCHORAGES (Discussion paper) 1. INTRODUCTION CARS 21 has stated in its findings that failure to wear a seat belt or
More informationSession Four Applying functional safety to machine interlock guards
Session Four Applying functional safety to machine interlock guards Craig Imrie Technology Specialist: Safety, NHP Electrical Engineering Products Abstract With the recent Australian adoption of functional
More informationSUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 13.11.2008 SEC(2008) 2861 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMT Accompanying document to the Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL
More informationScientific expert workshop on CO2 emissions from light duty vehicle Lisbon 7-8 June Session 3: challenges of measuring real driving emissions
Scientific expert workshop on CO2 emissions from light duty vehicle Lisbon 7-8 June 2016 Session 3: challenges of measuring real driving emissions DIRECTION RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT Stéphane RIMAUX (Fuel
More information* * * Brussels, 20th October 2012
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Sustainable growth and EU 2020 Sustainable Mobility and Automotive industry TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES EXPERT GROUP - TAAEG Brussels, 30 November
More information12 th HDV CO 2 EDITING BOARD MEETING Slides TU Graz
12 th HDV CO 2 EDITING BOARD MEETING Slides TU Graz Stefan Hausberger, Martin Rexeis 18.05.2018, Brussels 1/ 17 Agenda item 3.a Technical support for the development of the CO2 HDV (buses and vans) certification
More informationEU initiative for CO2 emissions reduction in Europe
EU initiative for CO2 emissions reduction in Europe Presented to FTA Logistics Carbon Working Group 13 th September 2011 Jonathan Murray Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership LowCVP 2011 Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership
More informationGEAR 2030 Working Group 1 Project Team 2 'Zero emission vehicles' DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS
GEAR 2030 Working Group 1 Project Team 2 'Zero emission vehicles' DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction The EU Member States have committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% by 2050 with an intermediate
More informationACEA Position Paper Post-2021 CO2 Regime for Passenger Cars
ACEA Position Paper Post-2021 CO2 Regime for Passenger Cars September 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The EU automobile industry has delivered significant reductions in CO2 emissions from new passenger cars
More informationTechnical Papers supporting SAP 2009
Technical Papers supporting SAP 29 A meta-analysis of boiler test efficiencies to compare independent and manufacturers results Reference no. STP9/B5 Date last amended 25 March 29 Date originated 6 October
More informationWritten questions to UTAC CERAM - EMIS hearing of 11/10/2016
A 012979 09.12.2016 Committee of Inquiry into Emission Measurements in the Automotive Sector Written questions to UTAC CERAM - EMIS hearing of 11/10/2016 1. For the French government, UTAC retested cars
More informationCars and vans CO2 regulations: even ambitious EU standards deliver less than half transport emission reductions needed to meet 2030 climate targets
Cars and vans CO2 regulations: even ambitious EU standards deliver less than half transport emission reductions needed to meet 2030 climate targets October 2017 Summary Road transport is one of the few
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Consumer Goods and EU Satellite navigation programmes Automotive industry Brussels, 08 April 2010 ENTR.F1/KS D(2010) European feed back to
More informationMINUTES. OF THE 1st MEETING TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES EXPERT GROUP - TAAEG * * *
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Consumer Goods and EU Satellite navigation programmes Automotive industry TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES EXPERT GROUP - TAAEG Brussels, 6.5.2010
More informationEvaluation study on Speed Limitation Devices. Scenarios and methodology Stakeholder conference 10 June 2013
Evaluation study on Speed Limitation Devices Scenarios and methodology Stakeholder conference 10 June 2013 Scenarios for the ex-ante evaluations for HCVs and LCVs What would be options for amending the
More informationWorld Light duty Test Procedures: Fiction or Reality?
World Light duty Test Procedures: Fiction or Reality? Philippe Jean Head of Unit Sustainable Mobility and Automotive Industry DG Enterprise and Industry Brussels, 6 May 2015 World Light duty Test Procedures
More informationInteroperability TSIs applicable to Railway vehicles. Innotrans, September, 2010
Interoperability TSIs applicable to Railway vehicles Innotrans, 21-24 September, 2010 1. Purpose of the presentation 2. Geographical scope (Directives and TSIs) 3. Technical scope of TSIs 4. TSIs applicable
More informationRDE LEGISLATION AND REAL- WORLD EMISSIONS ERMES (TNO/TUG/LAT)
RDE LEGISLATION AND REAL- WORLD EMISSIONS ERMES (TNO/TUG/LAT) EUROPEAN RDE LEGISLATION on-road type-approval emission testing of new vehicles phase 1: 1 Sept. 2017 (new models)/1 Sept. 2019 (all models)
More informationFuel consumption measurement in LDVs
Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs TCMV Meeting Brussels, 5 October 2017 Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not reflect the official European Commission
More informationDEPLOYMENT STRATEGIES FOR CLEAN AND FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLES: EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION AND SENSITIZATION IN INFLUENCING PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR
DEPLOYMENT STRATEGIES FOR CLEAN AND FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLES: EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION AND SENSITIZATION IN INFLUENCING PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR Leen GOVAERTS, Erwin CORNELIS VITO, leen.govaerts@vito.be ABSTRACT
More informationAcademia, Industry and Government: together for automotive engineering development
Academia, Industry and Government: together for automotive engineering development code: EAEC- 15 009B-FEP Paper title: CO2 EMISSION DETERMINATION IN ACCORD WITH EUROPEAN REGULATION FOR OLD AND TODAY CARS
More informationModifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles
Submitted by the expert from Germany Informal document GRVA-01-30 1st GRVA, 25-28 September 2018 Agenda item 7 Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles Explanation of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/4
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX xxx [ ](2016) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX correcting Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No
More information* * * Brussels, 9 February 2015
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL MARKET, INDUSTRY, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SMES Sustainable growth and EU 2020 Sustainable Mobility and Automotive Industry TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES EXPERT
More informationReal Driving Emissions
Real Driving Emissions John May, AECC UnICEG meeting 8 April 2015 Association for Emissions Control by Catalyst (AECC) AISBL AECC members: European Emissions Control companies Exhaust emissions control
More informationEstimation of Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Ghana, Methodology and Results 12/04/2018
Estimation of Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Ghana, Methodology and Results OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF STUDY METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW OF VEHICLE INVENTORY IN GHANA DATA CLEANING RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS
More informationMethodology Validation Report for United Technologies Corporation
April 2011 Prepared by: First Environment, Inc. 91 Fulton Street Boonton, New Jersey 07005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Objective... 1 1.2 Scope and Criteria... 1 1.3 Assurance... 1 2 Methodology...
More informationTyre noise limits of EC/661/2009 and ECE R117: Evaluation based on sold tyres in the Netherlands
Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB-60-08 (60th GRB, 1-3 September 2014, agenda item 9) M+P MBBM group People with solutions MEMORANDUM www.mplusp.eu To Attn. Ministry
More informationModelling LEZ and Demand Management measures in the City of York using Detailed Traffic-Emission Tools
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT IAPSC Monday 11 th June 2012 Modelling LEZ and Demand Management measures in the City of York using Detailed Traffic-Emission Tools Dr James Tate
More informationDIRECTIVE 2006/40/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
L 161/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 14.6.2006 DIRECTIVE 2006/40/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 May 2006 relating to emissions from air-conditioning systems in motor
More informationAutomotive Particle Emissions: an update of regulatory Euro 6/VI and UNECE developments
Automotive Particle Emissions: an update of regulatory Euro 6/VI and UNECE developments Steininger Nikolaus European Commission The presentation should provide an update on ongoing and imminent regulatory
More informationInformation on historical data on new vehicle registrations, necessary for the ageing and scrappage calculations, enter the view on the right side.
15. Vehicles by age Overview Target This view is completely focused on vehicles. Its primary aims are the evaluation new vehicle registrations on the basis of projections on the evolution of the vehicle
More informationState-of-play of the project and possible way ahead
Meeting of the Technical Working Group on Correlation (TWG) State-of-play of the project and possible way ahead Brussels, 23 October 2013 Biagio.Ciuffo@jrc.ec.europa.eu Alessandro.Marotta@jrc.ec.europa.eu
More informationVEPM 5.3. Vehicle Emission Prediction Model update: Technical report. Prepared for NZ Transport Agency. April 2017
VEPM 5.3 Vehicle Emission Prediction Model update: Prepared for NZ Transport Agency April 2017 Suite 1-6, D72 Building, 72 Dominion Rd Mt Eden, Auckland 1024 +64 9 629 1435 www.emissionimpossible.co.nz
More informationNotification of a Proposal to issue a Certification Memorandum. Rotor Drive System Gearbox TBO Development
EASA Proposed CM No.: Proposed CM-RTS-002 Issue 01 Revision 01 Notification of a Proposal to issue a Certification Memorandum Rotor Drive System Gearbox TBO Development EASA Proposed CM No.: Proposed CM
More informationRevision of Directive 96/53/EC
Revision of Directive 96/53/EC Public Hearing Committee on Transport and Tourism 17 September 2013 Ivan Hodac Secretary General, ACEA The Automobile Industry in Europe Key figures 15 major international
More informationFuel consumption measurement in LDVs
Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs WLTP 2 nd act Working Group Brussels, 20 September 2017 Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not reflect the official
More informationThe European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre. VECTO - Overview VECTO Workshop Ispra, November, 2018
The European Commission s science and knowledge service Joint Research Centre VECTO - Overview 2018 VECTO Workshop Ispra, November, 2018 Content Background Overview VECTO method Simulation tool Component
More informationThe Truth is on the Road Real Driving Emissions
The Truth is on the Road Real Driving Emissions Dr. Axel Friedrich Dr. Axel Friedrich Germany Dr. Axel Friedrich Berlin Berlin EU Air Quality Directive 28//EC Pollutant Concentration Averaging Legal nature
More informationWLTP for fleet. How the new test procedure affects the fleet business
WLTP for fleet How the new test procedure affects the fleet business Editorial Ladies and Gentlemen, The automotive industry is facing a major transformation process that will also affect the fleet business
More informationEco-Innovation working group meeting. JRC, Ispra, Italy
Eco-Innovation working group meeting 16 th & 17 th of May 2017 JRC, Ispra, Italy 1 Agenda 16 th of May (usual participants + experts) 12:00-13:30 welcome lunch and tour of the Visitors' Centre 13:30-18:00
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
8.3.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 65/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 195/2013 of 7 March 2013 amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament
More information(Text with EEA relevance)
L 180/10 17.7.2018 COMMISSION IMPLEMTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1002 of 16 July 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 to clarify and simplify the correlation procedure and to adapt it to changes
More informationFeatured Articles Utilization of AI in the Railway Sector Case Study of Energy Efficiency in Railway Operations
128 Hitachi Review Vol. 65 (2016), No. 6 Featured Articles Utilization of AI in the Railway Sector Case Study of Energy Efficiency in Railway Operations Ryo Furutani Fumiya Kudo Norihiko Moriwaki, Ph.D.
More informationAnalysis of WLTP Utility Factor Distributions
WLTP-06-08e Analysis of WLTP Utility Factor Distributions ACEA EV Group IG WLTP Meeting, Vienna Contact: Andreas.EA.Eder@bmw.de 26.3.2014 Basics and usage of the Utility Factor in WLTP according to GTR
More informationQuestions to the PSA GROUP
A 012036 11.11.2016 Committee of Inquiry into Emission Measurements in the Automotive Sector s to the PSA GROUP No 1 From a technical point of view, exemptions for the use of devices interfering with pollution
More informationTechnology and policy drivers of the fuel economy of new light-duty vehicles Comparative analysis across selected automotive markets
Technology and policy drivers of the fuel economy of new light-duty vehicles Comparative analysis across selected automotive markets Pierpaolo Cazzola, International Energy Agency Content GFEI and the
More informationInitial processing of Ricardo vehicle simulation modeling CO 2. data. 1. Introduction. Working paper
Working paper 2012-4 SERIES: CO 2 reduction technologies for the European car and van fleet, a 2020-2025 assessment Initial processing of Ricardo vehicle simulation modeling CO 2 Authors: Dan Meszler,
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2018) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2400 and Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards
More informationAssessing impacts of fuel economy measures FEPIT
ALEX KOERNER IEA Assessing impacts of fuel economy measures FEPIT Paris, June 11 2015 alexander.koerner@iea.org Contents Introduction Purpose of FEPIT Setting of the baseline FEPIT: included policy measures
More information