STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Transcription

1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF : PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY : PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-19 FROM A : DECISION OF THE CITY OF NEWARK ZONING : BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DENYING AN : BPU DOCKET NO. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL : SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND VARIANCES : NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A : 230/26/13kV SWITCHING STATION : : (McCARTER SWITCHING STATION) : PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY P-1 Direct Pre-Filed Testimony of Esam A. F. Khadr, With Supporting Exhibits EAK-1 to -4

2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF : PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY : PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-19 FROM A : DECISION OF THE CITY OF NEWARK ZONING : BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DENYING AN : BPU DOCKET NO. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL : SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND VARIANCES : NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A : 230/26/13kV SWITCHING STATION : : (McCARTER SWITCHING STATION) : : TO THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONERS OF THE NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: PRE-FILED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ESAM A. F. KHADR ON BEHALF OF PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY IN SUPPORT OF THE McCARTER SWITCHING STATION PROJECT I. PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND Q. Please state your name, business address, and occupation. A. My name is Esam A. F. Khadr. I am employed by Public Service Electric and Gas Company ( PSE&G ), 80 Park Plaza, Newark, New Jersey I currently hold the position of Managing Director Electric Delivery Planning. I have been employed by PSE&G for a total of 38 years, and have worked for the past 33 years in the transmission and resource planning area. Q. What are your responsibilities in that position? A. My responsibilities include planning and designing the electric transmission and

3 distribution systems to maintain the future reliability of the PSE&G system and related systems to which it is interconnected. My job responsibilities include performing transmission reliability studies to determine compliance with reliability criteria established by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ), as well as with PJM and PSE&G-specific reliability and operational performance criteria. As part of these responsibilities, I coordinate with both PJM and ReliabilityFirst Corporation ( RFC ), the regional arm of NERC covering the PJM region. Q. What is your educational background? A. I earned a Bachelor Degree in Electrical Engineering from the New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1975 and a Masters of Science in Electrical Engineering in 1980 from Manhattan College. Q. Please summarize your employment experience with PSE&G. A. I have been employed by PSE&G since 1976, and have held various engineering and technical management positions of increasing responsibility. Currently, I am Managing Director Electric Delivery Planning for PSE&G. I manage the electric transmission and distribution planning organization for PSE&G and participate in the PJM planning process. Q. Are you a member of any professional organizations? A. I have chaired the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ( IEEE ) Power Engineering Society in New York and have served as an industry advisor to several 21 Electric Power Research Institute ( EPRI ) power systems analysis programs. I co authored California Energy: The Ingredients for a Crisis, published in Corporate Real Estate Executive, Vo. 16, No. 3, April

4 Q. Have you previously testified before the BPU? A. Yes, I have testified in regulatory proceedings before the BPU on behalf of PSE&G. Most recently, I have testified before the BPU related to the need for the construction of the New Jersey portion of the 500kV Susquehanna-Roseland transmission line and for the need for the 230 kv North Central Reliability Project. I also testified before numerous land use boards in the State of New Jersey, including testifying before the City of Newark s Zoning Board of Adjustment ( ZBA ) in support of the proposed McCarter Switching Station Project (the Project ) pending before the BPU as the current petition. My testimony before the ZBA addressed the need for the construction of the Project in the City of Newark (the City ), which is the purpose of my testimony before the BPU today. 12 II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY Q. On whose behalf are you submitting your testimony? A. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of PSE&G in this proceeding. Q. What is the purpose of your testimony? A. My testimony supports several purposes. First, I will provide a high-level description of the Project. Next, I will describe the nature and objective of reliability planning as such planning pertains to the transmission system. I will then describe PSE&G s involvement in the Regional Transmission Expansion Planning ( RTEP ) process performed by PJM that identified the electrical need for this Project as well as the mandate from PJM that this Project be constructed. I will explain why the Project is needed, from a transmission planning - 3 -

5 perspective, to address PJM-identified reliability criteria violations primarily within the City. I will further explain why it is critical that this Project be built in a timely manner, as failure to address the reliability criteria violations could result in the potential for system brown-outs and black-outs within the City and surrounding areas. I will also explain why alternatives are insufficient to address the identified reliability problems. In addition to addressing the PJM-identified reliability criteria violations in a timely manner, the Project, once in service, will provide numerous additional benefits to PSE&G s system and PSE&G s customers located within the City. As discussed further below, construction of the Project will also provide vital back-up and redundancy to the Newark Switching Station and will protect against extended service outages that could result from facility failures at the Newark Switching Station. Finally, I will explain the sources of the line loading estimates that I supplied to PSE&G witness Kyle King to enable him to characterize electric and magnetic field levels across the Project Q. Are you sponsoring any exhibits? A. Yes, I am sponsoring Exhibits EAK-1 to -4 with my direct testimony: EAK-1: PJM TEAC Slides EAK-2: June 16, 2010 Construction Responsibility Letter EAK-3: Newark Load Pocket Map EAK-4: PJM Transmission Construction Status List dated February 19,

6 1 III. BACKGROUND Q. Have you participated in the planning and/or development of other transmission line, substation, or switching station projects during your professional career with PSE&G? A. Yes. I have been working in PSE&G s planning department since 1980, and have personally participated in transmission planning activities with respect to numerous transmission line, substation, and switching station projects that have been examined, studied and/or constructed throughout PJM. I also serve as PSE&G s representative on the PJM Planning Committee and the PJM Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee ( TEAC ), and I am the PSE&G representative on the ongoing Regional Planning Process Task Force Group ( RPPTF ). I am also one of PSE&G s representatives on the Reliability Committee of RFC. Q. Would you briefly describe, in a summary fashion, the electric distribution territory served by PSE&G? A. PSE&G currently serves nearly three quarters of New Jersey s population in a service territory stretching diagonally across the State of New Jersey, covering 2,600 square miles, including all of New Jersey s six largest cities, and running from Bergen County in the northeastern portion of the State down to an area below the city of Camden in the southwest. PSE&G has a customer base of approximately 2.1 million electric customers, and its load requirements are divided among residential, commercial and industrial customers. The PSE&G transmission grid is comprised of approximately 1,500 circuit miles

7 Q. Please briefly describe the electrical service for the City. A. PSE&G has four (4) 138kV transmission circuits that feed four (4) stations that support the City of Newark and the surrounding area. This has created a load pocket within the PSE&G system (the Newark Load Pocket ). See Exhibit EAK-3 for a map showing the location of this load pocket. As described below in more detail, PJM has identified that the loss of two (2) of the transmission sources to the Newark Load Pocket will cause overloaded circuits which violate NERC reliability criteria. Additionally, the Newark Switching Station, which was built in 1959 and provides approximately 300MVA (megavolt ampere) of the 500MVA that services the Newark Load Pocket, has minimal back up capacity in the event of a failure. Without the Project, failure of the Newark Switching Station or the sources supplying the Newark Switching Station may lead to brown-outs and black-outs throughout the City, including the Central Business District, as was experienced during Superstorm Sandy. 14 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Q. Please briefly describe the Project from an electrical perspective. A. The Project includes the installation of new 230kV/26kV/13kV switching stations in the Newark Load Pocket in order to tie into the existing Aldene-Essex 230kV circuit as 18 mandated by PJM. Equipment at the Station will include transformers, circuit breakers, a gas-insulated switchgear ( GIS ) building, ancillary structures to house equipment, access roads, drainage upgrades, exterior site screening and lightning masts and other electrical support structures on concrete foundations. These are state of the art facilities similar to other recently constructed switching stations in PSE&G s - 6 -

8 1 2 3 system. William L. Labos, Director of Asset Reliability for PSE&G has also submitted testimony that provides additional information on the Project from an electrical design perspective V. RELIABILITY PLANNING Q. What happens when a transmission line overloads or exceeds its loading capability? A. When a transmission line overloads (the loading on the line exceeds its applicable rating), the conductor and the line terminal equipment begin to overheat. Overheating the conductor or the terminal equipment may cause a failure of the circuit. Failure of the circuit could lead to brown-outs and black-outs depending on the availability of other transmission lines. This is even more significant for underground transmission circuits similar to those servicing the City. If an underground transmission circuit is damaged due to overloading, it will likely take weeks or months to repair which will stress the other existing lines for longer periods of time. In short, overloading transmission lines may cause permanent damage to transmission infrastructure, as well as power outages. Q. What action is required to prevent transmission line overloads? A. There are both short-term and long-term actions that need to be taken to prevent transmission line overloads. In the short-term, to prevent the consequences of a potential transmission line overload, operational actions and directives are implemented by PJM system operators and PSE&G before the line or related equipment fails or is permanently damaged. Such short-term operational actions may include turning specific generating plants off or on, opening or closing specific transmission lines, transferring - 7 -

9 load or discontinuing electric service to certain customers or groups of customers in specific areas. The last of these would be brown-outs for those customers affected. However, these are only emergency and temporary fixes. They may prevent a specific breakdown on that particular occasion but do not solve the underlying problem. That is the purpose of transmission planning to design the system and plan for contingencies to resolve the underlying reliability criteria violations and to prevent transmission line overloads from occurring in the first place. On a long-term basis, construction of additional transmission infrastructure is necessary. Q. How do you as a transmission planner determine if there is a need for a planning solution to remedy reliability problems such as line overloads? A. NERC has been designated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( FERC ) as the Electric Reliability Organization ( ERO ) for the United States. Mandatory reliability standards developed by NERC and approved by FERC, which carry with them significant penalties for non-compliance, are used by transmission planners to measure the need for additional transmission. The NERC Reliability Standards define the reliability requirements for planning and operating the North American bulk power system (facilities operated at 100 kv and above). Specifically, the NERC Reliability Standards require PJM to test events which fall into three (3) categories: A, B and C. NERC Category A criteria, for example, requires that, for all facilities in service, ratings and system voltage limits are respected and the system is stable. NERC Category B criteria impose similar requirements but with one (1) facility removed from service (referred to n minus 1 criteria). Finally, NERC Category C criteria impose such requirements in situations - 8 -

10 involving second contingencies (i.e., the loss of a second system element (referred to as n-1-1 ). NERC Reliability Standards, Category C were the criteria used by PJM to determine that the Project was needed to maintain reliability. Q. How are the NERC Reliability Standards used to determine when additional transmission is needed? A. The NERC Reliability Standards require PJM to identify the critical system conditions that the system must be evaluated against to ensure the system meets the performance criteria specified in these standards. Once these critical system conditions are established, PJM, in conjunction with the transmission owners, performs tests to ensure that the system meets the performance criteria in the NERC Reliability Standards. When these tests show an inability of the existing transmission system to meet a specific reliability standard or standards under these conditions, construction of additional transmission infrastructure becomes necessary. 15 VI. THE PJM PLANNING PROCESS Q. Could you please describe the process that resulted in the decision to construct the Project? A. PJM has in place a FERC-approved RTEP process. This process is memorialized in Schedule 6 of PJM s Operating Agreement, entitled Regional Transmission Expansion Planning Protocol. The purpose of the RTEP is to enable the transmission needs in the PJM Region to be met on a reliable, economic and environmentally acceptable basis. Under this process, PJM plans the integrated transmission grid it operates, and - 9 -

11 identifies potential future reliability criteria violations, utilizing a regional perspective in collaboration with each individual transmission owner. Q. Are there other parameters applicable to PJM s planning process? A. Yes. PJM s planning process is collaborative and provides an open and inclusive forum for participation by all classes of market participants and stakeholders. In fact, FERC requires that PJM s planning process be open, participatory and transparent. Q. How does the RTEP planning process work? A. The RTEP identifies transmission system upgrades and enhancements needed to maintain the reliability of the transmission system. This identification process keys off of a baseline power case that models expected future system conditions, including existing transmission, generation and demand-side resources, as well as transmission, generation and demand response that is reasonably certain to exist. The result is a single process that integrates many system factors and requires PJM to make initial forecasting assumptions regarding load forecasts, the development or retirement of generation, demand response resources and electricity transfer levels between portions of the grid. These assumptions are then updated annually to reflect, among other things, changes in planned generation or demand response and updated load forecasts. PJM then performs tests on its baseline power case to determine whether there are any potential future violations of NERC Reliability Standards that need to be addressed through the RTEP. Q. What happens once PJM identifies potential future reliability criteria violations on the system? A. Through its RTEP process, PJM, in collaboration with affected transmission owners

12 such as PSE&G, develops specific transmission solutions that are needed to remedy those violations and maintain the reliability of the transmission system. An RTEP project is then publicly presented and discussed at PJM s TEAC, at which time stakeholder input and comment regarding the project is obtained. Again, this is an open, public, and transparent process. Following this discussion, the project is then submitted to PJM s Board of Managers for review and approval. 7 If approved by the PJM Board of Managers, PJM then designates a transmission owner or transmission owners as having construction and ownership responsibility for the project. Q. Please explain the nature of PSE&G s role in this planning process, and in the selection of the Project in particular. A. Under the PJM planning process, PJM is typically responsible for identifying reliability criteria violations within the PJM region. However, for more localized issues, such as load pockets, the transmission owner can identify the issue for PJM s analysis and validation. Assuming that PJM and the transmission owner are in agreement on the nature of the reliability criteria violation or violations at issue, they then work collaboratively in identifying a solution that will remedy the violation(s). The transmission owner is also responsible for developing the construction specifics of a given reliability project, since the transmission owner has greater knowledge of issues such as rights-of-way and local system topology. For this particular Project, PSE&G identified reliability criteria violations that were projected to begin in Specifically, there are four 138kV underground cable circuits serving the Newark Load Pocket. When there is a loss of any two (2) circuits

13 (n-1-1), the remaining two (2) circuits are loaded above their normal rating. In this case, PJM uses the normal rating for a loss of underground cable circuit as the basis of the analysis rather than the emergency rating because of the extended time required to repair an underground transmission circuit. In the present case, PJM and PSE&G determined that the load would exceed the capacity of the remaining two 138kV underground transmission circuits that supply the Newark Load Pocket following the loss of two (2) of the underground transmission circuits. See Exhibit EAK-3 showing the location of Newark Load Pocket. Having identified these potential reliability problems, PJM and PSE&G, the affected transmission owner, worked together to determine the appropriate solution. This solution was then reviewed by the TEAC before the PJM Board reviewed and approved inclusion of the Project in the regional plan. Q. What is the duration of PJM s planning horizon in identifying reliability upgrades? A. PJM performs a 5-year baseline analysis (which includes the current year plus 5 years) to assess compliance with all applicable reliability standards and to identify needed transmission upgrades to meet near-term demand growth for customers electricity needs. This 5-year baseline analysis, however, is only the first step in a more comprehensive 15-year planning process. Under this long-term planning analysis, PJM evaluates the needs of the system for 6 years out to 15 years. The purpose of this planning horizon is to permit the timely consideration of many long lead-time transmission options, ensuring there is sufficient time to address future system reliability needs. This long-term planning analysis also ensures compliance with

14 Section of the PJM Consolidated Transmission Owners Agreement ( TOA ), a FERC-approved agreement between PJM and the PJM transmission owners, which provides that PJM should conduct its transmission planning based on a planning horizon of at least ten (10) years. Q. Once PJM included the Project as part of its RTEP process, and this Project was approved by the PJM Board of Managers, was a transmission owner, in this case PSE&G, then obligated to construct the Project? A. Yes, under Section 4.2 of the TOA, PSE&G was obligated to construct the Project. Q. Please explain the nature of PSE&G s construction obligation. A. Once a reliability-based RTEP project is approved by the PJM Board of Managers, PJM then designates a transmission owner, such as PSE&G, as the appropriate entity to construct, own and/or finance the project or a portion thereof. That entity can then either build the project itself or contract with another entity to fulfill its obligation to build. In the case of the Project, PSE&G received a notice dated June 16, 2010, notifying the company that PSE&G had been designated to build a new 230 kv substation by tapping the Aldene-Essex circuit, installing three 230/26 kv transformers, and serving some of the Newark Load Pocket from the new station. This letter is attached to my testimony as Exhibit EAK-2. Originally, PSE&G did not accept the designation of construction responsibility for the Project due to the feasibility of the original scope of the Project. The scope was later revised pursuant to the June 2011 TEAC slides (see Exhibit EAK-1) and PSE&G has since accepted responsibility

15 1 VII. NEED FOR THE PROJECT Q. Please provide an overview of the reliability issues in the City that the Project is intended to address. A. There are three (3) different reliability issues that the Project is intended to address. The first and most important reliability issue concerns the NERC Category C n-1-1 criteria violations that are anticipated to begin in As indicated above, there are currently four 138kV underground cable circuits serving the Newark Load Pocket. If two (2) of the circuits are out of service (n-1-1), the loading on the remaining two (2) circuits exceeds its normal rating. As explained previously, this increased loading impairs reliability because it degrades the transmission circuits which increases the probability for failure and may lead to brown-outs and black-outs. In this case, because of the extended time required to repair an underground cable circuit, PJM uses the normal rating rather than the emergency rating to determine whether the rating of the line is exceeded. In addition to the resolution of potential NERC Reliability Standard violations, PSE&G has also determined that there are also benefits to the PSE&G system and its customers within the City that will result from constructing the Project. The Project will provide a vital back-up to the Newark Switching Station. Currently, the Newark Switching Station, which was built in 1959 and provides approximately 300MVA of the 500MVA in the Newark Load Pocket, has no emergency back-up if the Station is lost in an emergency event. For example, as seen during Superstorm Sandy, when the transmission sources to the Newark Switching Station were down, PSE&G was unable

16 to provide service to a large section of the City, including the Central Business District, for more than 24 hours. Finally, the Project is intended to address aging infrastructure at Newark Switching Station and reduce the current load on the 26kV network supplied from the Newark Switching Station. As indicated, the Newark Switching Station was built in PSE&G has identified that, given the construction and anticipated load growth in the City, the current 26kV networks providing service from the Newark Switching Station cannot handle the expected load. By constructing the Project, PSE&G would be able to reduce the stress on the Newark Switching Station s 26kV network by using the 26kV networks associated with the Project to handle some of that load and thereby extend the useful life of that equipment. Q. Has PJM analyzed and confirmed the electrical need for the Project? A. Yes, as part of the PJM TEAC process PJM completed its own analysis and confirmed the need for the Project. Additionally, the City of Newark Zoning Board did not dispute the need for the Project. In the Resolution of Denial issued by the ZBA, the ZBA acknowledged that the Project is needed. See Exhibit DGR-2 for a copy of the resolution of denial of the ZBA. Q. Based on your reviews and assessments, have you formed an opinion regarding the need for the Project? A. Yes, I have. Based on my review of the relevant information and my knowledge of the PSE&G system, it is my opinion that this Project provides the best solution from a reliability and planning perspective to the reliability issues identified. As noted above, this Project is vital to the reliability of the electric service to the City s electric

17 customers. Q. In your opinion, could alternative approaches be used to address the City s needs? A. No, there are no other long-term alternatives to constructing the McCarter Switching Station in the City. Given the amount of load currently forecasted within the Newark Load Pocket and using the NERC n-1-1 criteria, only additional transmission sources into the Newark Load Pocket can resolve the violations. Additionally, only the Project will be able to provide the vital back-up and redundancy to the existing Newark Switching Station. Q. In your opinion as a transmission planner, is this Project needed to ensure the continued provision of safe, adequate and reliable electric utility service for the City? A. Yes it is. This station provides the critical foundation to relieve the Newark Load Pocket, establish emergency back-up to the Newark Switching Station, and provide relief to the Newark 26kV networks. It also increases the transmission and distribution 15 capacity to the Newark Load Pocket. Without construction of this Project, PSE&G will be challenged in serving the electric loads within the City during an n-1-1 situation which may lead to brown-outs or black-outs in the City under these circumstances. Q. The Project had an original in-service date of Is it your opinion that this Project needed to be placed into service in 2012? A. Yes, the Project was needed to be in-service in However, given the timeframe for locating a property and obtaining the necessary approvals, PSE&G completed temporary fixes to bridge the gap until the Project could be constructed

18 Q. How has PSE&G managed to maintain its system in Newark without this Project before now? A. Initially, PSE&G re-conductored two (2) of the four (4) underground 138kV circuits providing service to the Newark Load Pocket. This short-term solution provided PSE&G with enough capacity to reach 2014, which is the current PJM in-service date for the Project. Given the recent denial by the ZBA, PSE&G will have to make emergency load transfers to stations outside of the Newark Load Pocket to maintain reliability in a contingency situation. However, these emergency load transfers simply stress other stations which, depending on the load on those stations during any given time, may transfer the problem to them as well. These are only emergency stop-gaps and a long-term solution is needed. 1 Transmission Construction Status List. See Exhibit EAK-4 attached hereto for PJM s 13 VIII. EMF DATA Q. Did you provide the expected power flows and estimated peak load to PSE&G witness Kyle King? A. Yes, I did Q. What was the purpose of this information? A. PSE&G calculated estimated power flows on transmission circuits into the Project in Additionally, PSE&G provided Mr. King the estimated peak loads at the Project for PSE&G witness Kyle King used these power flow values and estimated peak 1 Although the PJM in-service date remains 2014, due to the denial at the ZBA, PSE&G anticipates that the Project s in-service date is 2016, at the earliest

19 1 2 loads to calculate magnetic field levels for the Project in the year 2018, the first full year of operation of 26kV and 13kV circuits at the Project Q. Briefly explain how this calculation was performed. A. The power flows were calculated by running power flow cases for the identified circuits in We optimized the phase angle regulators at the Essex Switching Station to obtain the worst case scenario. 95% of the time the expected power flows would be lower than the calculated power flows provided to Mr. King. The 2018 projected peak load used by Mr. King in his analysis was based on actual peak loads experienced in the past, adjusted for future load growth and a weather temperature humidity index for Q. Does this conclude your testimony? A. Yes, it does

20 Exhibit EAK-1

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Exhibit EAK-2

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37 Exhibit EAK-3

38

39 Exhibit EAK-4

40 ISA In Revised In Projected In Initial TEAC Latest TEAC Status Percent Study Baseline Report Applicable Status Display Service Upgrade ID Description Service Date Service Date Service Date Date Date Code Complete County State Region Transmission Owner Revised Desc Year Year Baseline Report Filename Cost Estimate Location Equipment Driver Task Last Updated Rating Voltage Image Date b0073 Reconductor 605 ft of the Kearny-Turnpike "D" 138 kv circuit 6/1/2008 6/1/2008 5/9/2005 UC 95 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 605 ft circuit rtep-baseline-rpt 0.2 Kearny-Turnpike "D" WN DCTL Contingency Reconductor 1/2/ / UC 6/1/ rtep-baselineassessment b0473 Move the 150 MVAR mobile capacitor from Aldene 230kV to Lawrence 230kV substation 6/1/2012 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 5/9/2007 UC 70 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Move the 150 MVAR from mobile capacitor from Aldene to Lawrence substation Aldene - Lawrence Capacitor PSEG Load Deliv Relocate 2/13/ MVAR 230 UC 6/1/ rtep-baselineassessment 2500 / 3000 b0489 Construct a Susquehanna - Roseland 500kV circuit (PSEG 500 kv equipment) 6/1/2012 6/1/2015 5/9/2007 UC 70 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG PSEG equipment Susquehanna - Roseland Circuit 15 Year Load Deliv. Construct 1/2/2014 MVA 500 UC 6/1/2012 b Replace Athenia 230kV breaker 31H 6/1/2012 6/1/2015 8/20/2008 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 31H rtep-baselineassessment 0.75 Athenia Breaker Short Circuit Replace 9/16/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2012 b Install two Roseland 500/230 kv transformers and upgrade 230 kv substation and switchyard 6/1/2012 6/1/2014 5/9/2007 UC 88 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG and upgrade substation rtep-baselineassessment 45 Roseland Transformer 15 Year Load Deliv. Construct 11/18/ / 1500 MVA 500/230 UC 6/1/ rtep-baselineassessment b Replace ECRR 138kV breaker '903' 6/1/2011 6/1/2015 9/16/2009 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 903' ECRR Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/19/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Bergen 138 kv breaker '30P' with 63 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '30P' with 63 ka 2.7 Bergen Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/26/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Bergen 138 kv breaker '80P' with 63 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '80P' with 63 ka 2.7 Bergen Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/26/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Bergen 138 kv breaker '70P' with 63 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '70P' with 63 ka 2.7 Bergen Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/26/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Bergen 138kV breaker '90P' with 63 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '90P' with 63 ka 2.7 Bergen Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/26/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Bergen 138 kv breaker '50P' with 63 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '50P' with 63 ka 2.7 Bergen Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/26/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2015 Build a new 230 kv substation (McArthur) by tapping the Aldeneâ Essex circuit, include another b1099 feed from West Orange, install three 230/26 kv transformers, and serve some of the Newark area load from the new station. 6/1/2012 6/1/2014 6/1/ /18/2009 8/4/2011 EP 25 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG (McCarter) by tapping the Aldene â Essex circuit, include another feed from West Orange, install three 230/26 kv transformers, and serve some of the Newark area load rtep-baselineassessment Aldene - Essex Substation N-1-1 Thermal Build 1/23/ /26 EP 6/1/2014 Convert the West Orange 138 kv substation, the Roseland â West Orange 138 kv circuit, and along with the Roseland â West Orange 138 kv circuit, and the Roseland â Sewaren 138 kv 2009-rtep-baselineassessment b1154 the Roseland â Sewaren 138 kv circuit from 138 kv to 230 kv 6/1/2014 6/1/ /16/2009 4/15/2011 UC 83 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG circuit from 138 kv to 230 kv West Orange Substation N-1-1 Voltage Convert 1/2/ UC 6/1/2014 b1155 Build a new 230 kv circuit from Branchburg to Bridgewater and reconfigure the Bridgewater 230 kv substation to breaker and a half configuration 6/1/2014 6/1/ /16/ /15/2011 UC 60 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG new circuit and reconfigure the Bridgewater 230 kv substation to breaker and a half configuration rtep-baselineassessment 80.4 Branchburg - Bridgewater Circuit N-1-1 Voltage Build and Reconfigure 1/2/ UC 6/1/2014 b1156 Convert the Burlington, Camden, and Cuthbert Blvd 138 kv substations and associated lines from 138 kv to 230 kv 6/1/2014 6/1/ /16/2009 4/15/2011 UC 70 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG from 138kV to 230kV including associated substations rtep-baselineassessment 399 Burlington - Camden - Cuthbert Blvd Substation N-1-1 Voltage Convert 1/2/ UC 6/1/2014 b Replace Camden 230 kv breaker '22H' with 80 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 UC 30 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '22H' with 80 ka 0 Camden Breaker Short Circuit Replace 9/3/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2014 b Replace Camden 230 kv breaker '32H' with 80 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 UC 30 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '32H' with 80 ka 0 Camden Substation Short Circuit Convert 11/26/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2014 b Replace Camden 230 kv breaker '21H' with 80 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 UC 30 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '21H' with 80 ka 0 Camden Breaker Short Circuit Replace 11/26/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2014 b Rebuild Camden 230 kv to 80 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 5/12/2011 UC 60 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG to 80 ka 399 Camden Substation Short Circuit Upgrade 1/2/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2014 b Rebuild Burlington 230 kv to 80 ka 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 6/9/2011 UC 70 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG to 80 ka 0 Burlington Substation Short Circuit Upgrade 1/2/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2014 b Reconductor the PSEG portion of the Burlington - Croydon circuit with 1590 ACSS 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 8/11/2010 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG the PSEG portion with 1590 ACSS 4.5 Burlington - Croydon Circuit Gen Deliverability Reconductor 1/27/ EP 6/1/2014 b1228 Re-configure the Lawrence 230 kv substation to breaker and half 6/1/2014 6/1/2014 9/8/2010 UC 95 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG to breaker and half 20.5 Lawrence Substation Gen Deliverability Reconfigure 1/2/ UC 6/1/2014 b1255 Build a new 69 kv substation (Ridge Road) and build new 69 kv circuits from Montgomery â Ridge Road â Penns Neck/Dow Jones 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 8/24/2010 UC 50 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG new Ridge Road substation and new 69kV circuits from Montgomery and Penns Neck/Dow Jones Ridge Road Substation Baseline analysis Build 9/3/ UC 6/1/2015 b Convert the existing 'D1304' and 'G1307' 138 kv circuits between Roseland - Kearny- Hudson to 230 kv operation 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 9/8/2010 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG existing 'D1304' and 'G1307' 138kV circuits to 230kV operation 770 Roseland - Kearny - Hudson Substation Baseline analysis Upgrade 1/2/ EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '52H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '52H' with 80 ka 125 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/2/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '62H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '62H' with 80 ka 0 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '72H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '72H' with 80 ka 0 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '82H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '82H' with 80 ka 0 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Essex 230 kv breaker '20H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 15 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '20H' with 80 ka 0 Essex Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Essex 230 kv breaker '21H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 15 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '21H' with 80 ka 0 Essex Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Essex 230 kv breaker '10H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 15 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '10H' with 80 ka 0 Essex Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Essex 230 kv breaker '11H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 15 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '11H' with 80 ka 0 Essex Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Essex 230 kv breaker '11HL' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 15 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '11HL' with 80 ka 0 Essex Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Newport R 230 kv breaker '23H' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '23H' with 63 ka 0 Newport R Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Expand existing Bergen 230 kv substation and reconfigure the Athenia 230 kv substation to breaker and a half scheme 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 9/8/2010 UC 80 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Expand existing Bergen 230 kv substation and reconfigure the Athenia 230 kv substation to breaker and a half scheme 0 Bergen Substation Baseline analysis Expand 1/3/ UC 6/1/2015 b Rebuild Athenia 230 kv substation to 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Rebuild to 80 ka 0 Athenia Substation Short Circuit Upgrade 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Build second 230 kv underground cable from Bergen to Athenia 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 9/8/2010 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG second 230kV underground cableale 0 Bergen - Athenia Underground Cable Baseline analysis Build 1/3/ EP 6/1/2015 b Build second 230 kv underground cable from Hudson to South Waterfront 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 9/8/2010 UC 40 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG second 230kV underground cable let 0 Hudson - South Waterfront Underground Cable Baseline analysis Build 1/3/ UC 6/1/2015 b Replace Athenia 230 kv breaker '21H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '21H' with 80 ka 0 Athenia Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace Athenia 230 kv breaker '41H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '41H' with 80 ka 0 Athenia Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '12H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '12H' with 80 ka 0 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '22H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '22H' with 80 ka 0 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b Replace South Waterfront 230 kv breaker '32H' with 80 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 18 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '32H' with 80 ka 0 South Waterfront Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2015 b1398 Build two new parallel underground circuits from Gloucester to Camden (via Cuthbert Blvd) 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/ /28/2010 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG two new parallel underground circuits 435 Camden Substation Baseline analysis Upgrade 1/7/ UC 6/1/2014 b Install shunt reactor at Gloucester to offset cable charging 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 3/31/ /28/2010 UC 75 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG to offset cable charging 435 Gloucester Shunt Reactor Baseline analysis Install 1/3/ UC 6/1/2014 b Replace Gloucester 230 kv breaker '21H' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 UC 50 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '21H' with 63 ka 0.6 Gloucester Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2015 b Replace Gloucester 230 kv breaker '51H' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '51H' with 63 ka 0.6 Gloucester Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2015 b Replace Gloucester 230 kv breaker '56H' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '56H' with 63 ka 0.6 Gloucester Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2015 b Replace Gloucester 230 kv breaker '26H' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 UC 50 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '26H' with 63 ka 0.6 Gloucester Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2015 b Replace Gloucester 230 kv breaker '71H' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 UC 75 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '71H' with 63 ka 0.6 Gloucester Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 230 UC 6/1/2015 b Reconfigure the Cuthbert station to breaker and a half scheme 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/ /28/2010 UC 60 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG to breaker and a half scheme 0 Cuthbert Substation Baseline analysis Reconfigure 1/3/ UC 6/1/2014 b Build a second 230 kv parallel overhead circuit from Mickleton â Gloucester 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/ /28/2010 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Build a second 230 kv parallel overhead circuit from Mickleton â Gloucester 0 Mickleton - Gloucester Circuit Baseline analysis Build 9/3/ UC 6/1/2014 b Reconductor the existing Mickleton â Gloucester 230 kv circuit (PSEG portion) 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/ /28/2010 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG existing circuit (PSEG portion) 4.79 Aldene Mickleton - Springfield - Gloucester Rd - Circuit Baseline analysis Reconductor 9/3/ UC 6/1/2014 b1399 Convert the 138 kv path from Aldene â Springfield Rd. - West Orange to 230 kv 6/1/ /31/ /28/2010 UC 26 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 138kV path to 230 kv 85 West Orange Circuit N-1-1 Thermal Convert 1/3/ UC 6/1/2014 b1410 Replace Salem 500kV breaker '11X' 6/1/2011 6/1/ /6/ /28/2010 EP 25 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG '11X' Salem Breaker Short Circuit Replace 9/13/ kA 500 EP 6/1/2012 b1413 Replace Salem 500kV breaker '21X' 6/1/2011 6/1/ /31/ /28/2010 EP 10 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG '21X' Salem Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/3/ kA 500 EP 6/1/2012 b1539 Replace Tosco 230 kv breaker 'CB1' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 'CB1' with 63 ka 0.6 Tosco Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/27/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2014 b1540 Replace Tosco 230 kv breaker 'CB2' with 63 ka 6/1/2015 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 'CB2' with 63 ka 0.6 Tosco Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/27/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2014 b1541 Open the Hudson 230 kv bus tie 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 5/12/2011 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Open the Hudson 230 kv bus tie 0 Hudson Bus Short Circuit Modify 9/3/ EP 6/1/2015 b1588 Reconductor the Eagle Point - Gloucester 230 kv circuit #1 and #2 with higher conductor rating 6/1/2016 6/1/2014 6/1/2015 7/7/2011 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG #1 and #2 with higher conductor rating Eagle Point - Gloucester Circuit Gen Deliverability Reconductor 1/3/ UC 6/1/2014 b1589 Re-configure the Kearny 230 kv substation and loop the P (Essex- NJT Meadows) 230 kv circuit 6/1/2016 6/1/2016 7/7/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG loop the P (Essex- NJT Meadows) 230 kv circuit 48 Kearny Substation Common Mode Reconfigure 1/3/ EP 6/1/2016 b1590 Upgrade the PSEG portion of the Camden - Richmond 230 kv circuit to six wire conductor and replace terminal equipments at Camden 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 7/7/2011 EP 25 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG (PSEG portion) to six wire conductor and replace terminal equipments at Camden 14.5 Camden - Richmond Circuit Common Mode Upgrade 1/3/ EP 6/1/2015 b1749 Advance n1237 (Replace Essex 230 kv breaker 'Breaker 4' with 80kA) 6/1/2012 6/1/ /27/2011 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Advance n1237 (Replace Essex 230 kv breaker 22H 'Breaker 4' with 80kA) 0.05 Essex Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/16/ kA 230 EP 6/1/2012 b1787 Build a second 230 kv circuit from Cox's Corner - Lumberton 6/1/2016 6/1/ /3/2011 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG second 230kV circuit 64 Cox's Corner - Lumberton Circuit N-1-1 Voltage Build 1/3/ EP 6/1/2016 b2037 Replace PVSC 138 kv breaker '452' 6/1/2013 6/1/2014 6/14/2012 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '452' 0.5 PVSC Breaker Short Circuit Replace 9/13/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2014 b2038 Replace PVSC 138 kv breaker '552' 6/1/2013 6/1/2014 6/14/2012 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG '552' 0.5 PVSC Breaker Short Circuit Replace 9/13/ kA 138 EP 6/1/2014 b2057 Tosco - G22_MTX5: Reconductor 0.3 miles of the circuit 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 4/27/2012 Pending 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 0.3 miles 0 Tosco - G22_MTX5 Circuit GenOn Deactivations Reconductor 2/21/ Pending 6/1/2015 b2139 Reconductor the Mickleton - Gloucester 230 kv parallel circuits with double bundle conductor 6/1/2017 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 9/13/2012 UC 35 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG with double bundle conductor Mickleton - Gloucester Circuits Gen Deliverability Reconductor 9/4/ UC 6/1/2015 b2146 Re-configure the Brunswick 230 kv and 69 kv substations 6/1/2017 6/1/ /12/2012 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG 47 Brunswick Substation Gen Deliverability Reconfigure 1/3/ /69 EP 6/1/2017 b2151 Construct Jackson Rd. 69 kv substation and loop the Cedar Grove - Hinchmans Ave into Jackson Rd. and construct Hawthorne 69 kv substion and build 69 kv circuit from Hinchmans Ave - Hawthorne - Fair Lawn 6/1/2016 6/1/ /12/2012 EP 5 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG and loop the Cedar Grove - Hinchmans Ave into Jackson Rd. and construct Hawthorne 69 kv substion and build 69 kv circuit from Hinchmans Ave - Hawthorne - Fair Lawn 105 Jackson Rd. Substation PSEG Criteria Construct 1/3/ EP 6/1/2016 Edison - Meadow Rd - b2218 Rebuild 4 miles of overhead line from Edison - Meadow Rd - Metuchen (Q-1317) 6/1/2015 6/1/2015 3/7/2013 EP 0 Unknown NJ PJM MA PSEG Rebuild 4 miles of overhead line from Edison - Meadow Rd - Metuchen (Q-1317) 46 Metuchen Line PSEG Deactivations Rebuild 12/10/ EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Saddlebrook 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Saddlebrook 230 kv 9.2 Saddlebrook Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Athenia 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Athenia 230 kv 8.4 Athenia Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Bergen 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Bergen 230 kv 8.3 Bergen Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Hudson 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Hudson 230 kv 7.9 Hudson Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/ MVAR b2243 Two 50 MVAR reactors at Stanley Tce 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Two 50 MVAR reactors at Stanley Tce 230 kv 15.7 Stanely Tce Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/2014 (each) 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at West Orange 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at West Orange 230 kv 8.7 West Orange Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Aldene 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Aldene 230 kv 6.9 Aldene Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Camden 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 150 MVAR reactor at Camden 230 kv 8.3 Camden Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015

41 ISA In Revised In Projected In Initial TEAC Latest TEAC Status Percent Study Baseline Report Applicable Status Display Service Upgrade ID Description Service Date Service Date Service Date Date Date Code Complete County State Region Transmission Owner Revised Desc Year Year Baseline Report Filename Cost Estimate Location Equipment Driver Task Last Updated Rating Voltage Image Date b MVAR reactor at Gloucester 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 150 MVAR reactor at Gloucester 230 kv 7.8 Gloucester Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Clarksville 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Clarksville 230 kv 7.2 Clarksville Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Hinchmans 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Hinchmans 230 kv 10 Hinchmans Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Beaver Brook 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Beaver Brook 230 kv 7 Beaver Brook Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b MVAR reactor at Cox's Corner 230 kv 6/1/2015 5/9/2013 7/11/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG 50 MVAR reactor at Cox's Corner 230 kv 7 Cox's Corner Reactor Op Performance Install 2/13/ MVAR 230 EP 6/1/2015 b2276 Eliminate the Sewaren 138 kv bus by installing a new 230 kv bay at Sewaren 230 kv 6/1/2015 6/6/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Eliminate the Sewaren138 kv bus by installing a new 230 kv bay at Sewaren 230 kv 101 Sewaren Bay PSEG Criteria Install 1/6/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the two 138 kv circuits from Sewaren â Metuchen to 230 kv circuits including Lafayette and Woodbridge substation 6/1/2015 6/6/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the two 138 kv circuits from Sewaren â Metuchen to 230 kv circuits including Lafayette and Woodbridge substation 0 Sewaren - Metuchen Circuit PSEG Criteria Convert 12/5/ EP 6/1/2015 b Reconfigure the Metuchen 230 kv station to accommodate the two converted circuits 6/1/2015 6/6/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Reconfigure the Metuchen 230 kv station to accommodate the two converted circuits 0 Metuchen Substation PSEG Criteria Reconfigure 12/5/ EP 6/1/2015 b2295 Replace the Salem 500 kv breaker 10X with 63kA breaker 6/1/2014 8/6/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Replace the Salem 500 kv breaker 10X 3.2 Salem Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/31/ ka 500 EP 6/1/2014 b2421 Install all 69kV lines to interconnect Plainfield, Greenbrook, and Bridgewater stations and establish the 69kV network 6/1/ /4/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Install all 69kV lines to interconnect Plainfield, Greenbrook, and Bridgewater stations and establish the 69kV network Plainfield, Greenbrook, Bridgewater Line Baseline Voltage Install 11/7/ EP 6/1/2018 b Install two 18MVAR capacitors at Plainfield and S. Second St substation 6/1/ /4/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Install two 18MVAR capacitors at Plainfield and S. Second St substation 0 Plainfield and S. Second Street Capacitors Baseline Voltage Install 2/13/ MVAR (each) 69 EP 6/1/2018 b Install a second four (4) breaker 69kV ring bus at Bridgewater Switching Station 6/1/ /4/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Install a second four (4) breaker 69kV ring bus at Bridgewater Switching Station 0 Bridgewater Ring Bus Baseline Voltage Install 11/7/ EP 6/1/2018 b2436 PSEG Northern NJ 345 kv Project 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG PSEG Northern NJ 345 kv Project 0 Linden - Marion - Bergen Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bergen - Marion 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bergen - Marion 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 0 Bergen - Marion Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/6/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bergen - Homestead "F" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bergen - Homestead "F" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Bergen - Homestead Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bergen - North Bergen "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bergen - North Bergen "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Bergen - North Bergen Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the North Bergen - Homestead "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the North Bergen - Homestead "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades North Bergen - Homestead Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Homestead - Marion "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Homestead - Marion "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Homestead - Marion Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Homestead - Marion "F" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Homestead - Marion "F" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Homestead - Marion Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Marion - Bayonne 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Marion - Bayonne 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 0 Marion - Bayonne Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/6/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Marion - Bayonne "L" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Marion - Bayonne "L" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Marion - Bayonne Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 Convert the Marion - Bayonne "C" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation b upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Marion - Bayonne "C" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 53.4 Marion - Bayonne Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bayonne - PVSC 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bayonne - PVSC 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 0 Bayonne - PVSC Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/6/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bayone - PVSC "I" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bayone - PVSC "I" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Bayonne - PVSC Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Construct a new Bayone - PVSC 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Construct a new Bayone - PVSC 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades Bayonne - PVSC Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the PVSC - North Ave 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the PVSC - North Ave 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 0 PVSC - North Ave Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/6/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the PVSC - North Ave "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the PVSC - North Ave "E" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades PVSC - North Ave Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Construct a new PVSC - North Ave 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Construct a new PVSC - North Ave 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades PVSC - North Ave Circuit Short Circuit Construct 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Construct a new North Ave - Airport 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Construct a new North Ave - Airport 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades North Ave - Airport Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/30/ EP 6/1/2015 b Relocate the underground portion of North Ave - Linden "T" 138 kv circuit to Bayway, convert it to 345 kv, and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Relocate the underground portion of North Ave - Linden "T" 138 kv circuit to Bayway, convert it to 345 kv, and any associated substation upgrades North Ave - Bayway Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/30/ EP 6/1/2015 b Construct a new Airport - Bayway 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Construct a new Airport - Bayway 345 kv circuit and any associated substation upgrades Airport - Bayway Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/30/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bayway - Linden 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bayway - Linden 138 kv path to double circuit 345 kv 0 Bayway - Linden Double Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/6/ EP 6/1/2015 b Relocate the overhead portion of Linden - North Ave "T" 138 kv circuit to Bayway, convert it to 345 kv, and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Relocate the overhead portion of Linden - North Ave "T" 138 kv circuit to Bayway, convert it to 345 kv, and any associated substation upgrades Linden - North Ave Circuit Short Circuit Relocate 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bayway - Linden "X" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bayway - Linden "X" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Bayway - Linden Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Convert the Bayway - Linden "Z" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Convert the Bayway - Linden "Z" 138 kv circuit to 345 kv and any associated substation upgrades Bayway - Linden Circuit Short Circuit Convert 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 Relocate Farragut - Hudson "B" and "C" 345 kv circuits to Marion 345 kv and any associated Relocate Farragut - Hudson "B" and "C" 345 kv circuits to Marion 345 kv and any associated b substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG substation upgrades Farragut - Hudson Circuits Short Circuit Relocate 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b Relocate the Hudson 2 generation to inject into the 345 kv at Marion and any associated upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Relocate the Hudson 2 generation to inject into the 345 kv at Marion and any associated upgrades Hudson Substation Short Circuit Relocate 1/29/ EP 6/1/2015 b New Bergen 345/230 kv transformer and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Bergen 345/230 kv transformer and any associated substation upgrades Bergen Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /230 EP 6/1/2015 b New Bergen 345/138 kv transformer #1 and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Bergen 345/138 kv transformer #1 and any associated substation upgrades Bergen Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /138 EP 6/1/2015 b New Bergen 345/138 kv transformer #2 and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Bergen 345/138 kv transformer #2 and any associated substation upgrades Bergen Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /138 EP 6/1/2015 b New Bayway 345/138 kv transformer #1 and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Bayway 345/138 kv transformer #1 and any associated substation upgrades 6.79 Bayway Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /138 EP 6/1/2015 b New Bayway 345/138 kv transformer #2 and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Bayway 345/138 kv transformer #2 and any associated substation upgrades 6.79 Bayway Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /138 EP 6/1/2015 b New Linden 345/230 kv transformer and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Linden 345/230 kv transformer and any associated substation upgrades Linden Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /230 EP 6/1/2015 b New Linden 230/138 kv transformer and any associated substation upgrades 6/1/ /7/2013 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG New Linden 230/138 kv transformer and any associated substation upgrades Linden Transformer Short Circuit New 1/29/ /138 EP 6/1/2015 b2438 Install two reactors at Tosco 230 kv 6/1/2014 1/9/2014 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Install two reactors at Tosco 230 kv 2.5 Tosco Reactors Short Circuit Install 1/10/ EP 6/1/2014 b2439 Replace the Tosco 138kV breaker 'CB1/2(CBT)' with 63kA 6/1/2014 1/9/2014 EP 0 Unknown WN PJM MA PSEG Replace the Tosco 138kV breaker 'CB1/2(CBT)' with 63kA 0.35 Tosco Breaker Short Circuit Replace 1/31/ ka 138 EP 6/1/2014