one parking space for each 145 m² of gross floor area; and (b) maximum of one parking space for each

Transcription

1 Parking and Loading Strategy April 26 th, Lon LaClaire & Eric Mital City of Vancouver Engineering Services 507 W Broadway Vancouver, BC, V5Z 0B4 Dear Lon and Eric Re: 400 W Georgia Office Development Parking & Loading Strategy Thank you very much for the extremely helpful meeting with us on February 20 th, As we explained at the meeting, 400 W Georgia is a proposed 24-storey mixed-use office and retail project with around 366,145 sq ft of GFA by Westbank Projects Corp in Downtown Vancouver. This unique project will be an architectural landmark at the eastern gateway into downtown, and provide much needed employment uses, complimenting the growing cultural and entertainment precinct surrounding the site. Key to ensuring sustainable design translates into sustainable building management is to create the right balance of parking to meet the needs of future tenants, while not oversupplying parking so as to try and align more with future mode share targets in Downtown Vancouver. Further, this applies to the loading facilities for the building to ensure an efficient use of space while not compromising functional capabilities of the City s lane and adjoining street network. The following paragraphs briefly outline the proposed parking, loading, and access strategy for the project moving forward, and summarize our understanding of the results of our conversation last week. Yours truly, Bunt & Associates Peter Joyce, P.Eng. Tyler Thomson, MUrb, MCIP, RPP, PTP Principal Transportation Planner PARKIG The City of Vancouver s Parking Bylaw (Bylaw 6059, Section 4) requires the provision of: (a) minimum of one parking space for each 145 m² of gross floor area; and (b) maximum of one parking space for each 115 m² of gross floor area for non-residential uses downtown. For the proposed tower this would equate to a parking supply in the range of 235 to 296 spaces. Additionally, the City allows for parking credits to apply against the parking supply requirement, which includes: 2:1 credit for disability parking spaces (based on a minimum required number of spaces); 1:5 credit for providing Class A bicycle parking spaces for office/retail uses (i.e. 1 parking space for each 5 Class A bicycle parking spaces) above the minimum requirement up to a maximum of 1 space for each 300m 2 ; and, 4:1 credit for providing car-share vehicles (typically assessed on a case by case basis) 1 At our meeting, you expressed support for the use of the car-share vehicle credit for our proposed project, given our shared intentions for the project. This is a very important element in our thinking, and we very much appreciate this confirmation. Two parking strategy options are currently being considered, one based on seeking to provide fewer parking spaces but which would be subject to substantial payment-in-lieu fees (Option 1), and the other which would seek to strike a balance between expected market parking needs and avoiding over-parking the site and which would be subject to a lesser payment-in-lieu levy (Option 2). Option 1: Payment-In-Lieu - High In this option, the project would be seeking to provide parking at a reduced rate so as to avoid providing additional levels of parking, as per the following components: 130 regular parking spaces (including up to 25% small car spaces) 14 disability parking spaces (accounting for 28 parking spaces) 5 car-share vehicles (accounting for 20 parking spaces) 113 Class A bicycle parking spaces (accounting for 8 parking spaces) Physical Total = 149 spaces Calculated Total = 187 spaces 1 ote that the Parking Bylaw allows this credit for residential uses downtown but will sometimes also allow this parking credit for commercial uses if deemed appropriate 400 W Georgia Parking & Loading Strategy April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables\ _ _400-W-Georgia_Parking+Loading_V03.docx 54

2 This strategy results in a shortfall of 48 parking spaces from the bylaw requirement which would result in a parking payment-in-lieu fee of $969,600. Beyond this, Westbank is proposing to utilize some surplus parking from the Telus Garden Office (TGO) project nearby which has provided additional parking beyond the minimum requirement. According to Westbank s records, the bylaw parking requirement for TGO was 380 parking spaces (including 320 for TGO, and 60 parking spaces for the William Farrell building), while the project actually provided 387 parking spaces leaving 7 surplus spaces compared to the bylaw requirement. Applying these 7 parking spaces to would reduce the parking supply shortfall to 41 spaces, which would result in a payment-in-lieu fee of $828,200. At our meeting, we were very pleased to hear your open-mindedness, and even enthusiasm, about a discussion with us regarding creative on-site or nearby ideas to direct these funds toward, and we discussed the possibility of a collaborative process between us to generate potential ideas. Further, given the site constraints at the ground level, Class A loading will have to be accommodated within the underground parkade; while the loading supply rationale will be described below, the project is looking to provide a total of 5 Class A spaces underground. This would amount to a total of 154 physical parking and Class A loading spaces provided below grade. Option 2: Payment-In-Lieu - Low Given the parking credit allowances, the project would be seeking to provide parking at a reduced rate as per the following components: 118 regular parking spaces 37 small car parking spaces 14 disability parking spaces (accounting for 28 parking spaces) 5 car-share vehicles (accounting for 20 parking spaces) 113 Class A bicycle parking spaces (accounting for 9 vehicle parking spaces) Physical Total = 174 spaces (excluding Class A loading) Calculated Total = 212 spaces As with Option 1, the project would be seeking to utilize the 7 surplus parking spaces in TGO provided above the bylaw requirement and apply these to 400 W Georgia s parking supply. This would amount to a total calculated parking supply of 219 spaces, which would be 16 spaces short of the bylaw requirement. The resulting parking payment-in-lieu fee would be $323,200 with this option. We were also keen to understand that the City was willing to allow the car-share credit for commercial uses as proposed in both parking supply options for this project. 400 W Georgia Parking & Loading Strategy April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables\ _ _400-W-Georgia_Parking+Loading_V03.docx LOADIG Based on the City of Vancouver s Parking Bylaw (Bylaw 6059, Section 5), the proposed development requires a total of 5 Class A loading spaces (all for office uses) and 6 Class B loading spaces (4 for office, and 2 for retail). Based on Bunt s past experience for similar downtown office and retail developments in Vancouver we believe the City s bylaw requirement to be greater than the actual observed demand, particularly for Class B loading needs. In particular, the observed peak loading demand rate for Class A and Class B loading vehicles for mixeduse office towers with ground floor supporting retail is approximately 2.7 vehicles/10,000 sq ft GFA/hour (65% Class A, and 35% Class B). At a target occupancy of 70% (i.e. loading spaces are occupied for 70% of the typical 10-hour work day, 7am 5pm), this would equate to a recommended supply of 5 Class A loading spaces, and 2 Class B loading spaces to achieve this level of efficiency. Therefore, the project is seeking to provide 5 Class A loading spaces below grade in the P1 level of the parkade, and 2 Class B loading spaces at the ground level accessed from the rear lane. It is also intended that these loading spaces would be shared between office and retail uses to allow for more efficient use. To help facilitate this, it is expected the City will require a robust Loading Management Plan (LMP) outlining the protocol for how the loading facilities would be utilized and managed as well as provide a level of indication of scheduling of use throughout a typical day/week. At our meeting, you expressed support in principle for this loading approach, on the understanding that we would provide the previously-mentioned loading management plan. ACCESS At our meeting, we also discussed access to the site, and it was agreed that parking access would be from the lane, while it is assumed at this time the lane connection to Georgia Street would remain open. This would likely remain the case until the time the adjacent site to the west is up for redevelopment at which time a potential lane connection to Richards Street could be investigated if it desirable to close the Georgia Street lane access. It was also discussed that a new one-way lane connection would connect from Homer Street to the rear lane and provide for drop-off/pick-up activity for the building on its south side. We understand since this meeting the City has voiced opposition to this connection and it has been removed from the plans. cc. Karen Hoese, City of Vancouver Michael aylor, City of Vancouver Gil Kelley, City of Vancouver Brent Toderian, Toderian Urban Works Dave Leung, Westbank Mitch Sakumoto, Merrick Architecture 400 W Georgia Parking & Loading Strategy April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables\ _ _400-W-Georgia_Parking+Loading_V03.docx 55

3 April 26 th, Mitch Sakumoto Merrick Architecture Cambie Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2P4 VIA Dear Mitch: Re: 400 W Georgia Rezoning Transportation Review Draft Letter As requested, Bunt has prepared a Transportation Review in support of the Rezoning Application for Westbank s proposed mixed-use office tower development at 400 W Georgia in Downtown Vancouver, BC. The following letter includes a summary of key transportation elements of the design at this stage of the project such as vehicle circulation, parking and bicycle parking provisions, loading access and provisions, as well as the anticipated level of traffic to be generated by the development in the future. This scope has been confirmed with the City to satisfy the transportation component of the application. We trust that this report will provide the necessary support for the development through the rezoning process. Yours truly, Bunt & Associates Tyler Thomson, MUrb, MCIP, RPP, PTP Amy Do, EIT Transportation Planner Transportation Analyst cc. Peter Joyce, Bunt & Associates 1. ITRODUCTIO 400 W Georgia is a proposed 24-storey mixed-use office and retail project with around 366,000 sq ft of GFA by Westbank Projects Corp (Westbank) in Downtown Vancouver. This unique project will be an architectural landmark at the eastern gateway into downtown, and provide much needed employment uses, complimenting the growing cultural and entertainment precinct surrounding the site. Key to ensuring sustainable design translates into sustainable building management is to create the right balance of parking to meet the needs of future tenants, while not oversupplying parking so as to try and align more with future mode share targets in Downtown Vancouver. Further, this applies to the loading facilities for the building to ensure an efficient use of space while not compromising functional capabilities of the City s lane and adjoining street network. The City of Vancouver s Engineering Department is requesting an abbreviated traffic study for 400 W Georgia given that they have already extensively studied the area as part of the Viaducts study. This study is required to include information summarizing the parking, and loading provisions for the project, as well as describing the site access and circulation for general vehicles and loading vehicles. In addition to this the City has requested information regarding existing traffic conditions and the expected trip generation for the site with the development in place. The following sections briefly outline the proposed parking and loading rationale, as well as an understanding of the on-site circulation, access strategy and anticipated trip generation for the project moving forward. Firs the development plan statistics are presented in Section DEVELOPMET PLA The proposed development plan statistics are summarized in Table 2.1 and will be used to calculate the parking and loading requirements, along with the vehicle trip generation in the following sections. Table 2.1: Development Plan Content. LAD USE GROSS FLOOR AREA Sq ft Sq m Commercial Office 349,278 32,449 Commercial - Retail 5, Total 366,145 34,016 The site plan is shown for the ground level on Exhibit W Georgia Rezoning Transportation Review Draft Letter April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables 56

4 [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.06 Ground Floor from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit 2.1 Site Plan April 2017 Scale Custom on Letter Prepared by AD S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _GF_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 15:47, Plotted by Amy Do 57

5 3. PARKIG & LOADIG REVIEW The City of Vancouver s Parking Bylaw (Bylaw 6059, Section 4) requires the provision of: (a) minimum of one parking space for each 145 m² of gross floor area; and (b) maximum of one parking space for each 115 m² of gross floor area for non-residential uses downtown. For the proposed tower this would equate to a parking supply in the range of 235 to 296 spaces. Additionally, the City allows for parking credits to apply against the parking supply requirement, which includes: 2:1 credit for disability parking spaces (based on a minimum required number of spaces); 1:5 credit for providing Class A bicycle parking spaces for office/retail uses (i.e. 1 parking space for each 5 Class A bicycle parking spaces) above the minimum requirement up to a maximum of 1 space for each 300m 2 ; and, 4:1 credit for providing car-share vehicles (typically assessed on a case by case basis) 1 The parking strategy developed for this project is seeking to strike a balance between expected market parking needs and avoiding over-parking the site and which would be subject to a lesser payment-in-lieu levy. 3.1 Parking Strategy Given the parking credit allowances, the project would be seeking to provide parking at a reduced rate compared to the City s Parking Bylaw as per the following components: 118 regular parking spaces 37 small car parking spaces 14 disability parking spaces (accounting for 28 parking spaces) 5 car-share vehicles (accounting for 20 parking spaces) 113 Class A bicycle parking spaces (accounting for 9 vehicle parking spaces) Physical Total = 174 spaces Calculated Total = 212 spaces Beyond this, the project is seeking to utilize 7 surplus parking spaces from Westbank s adjacent TELUS Garden Office project which are provided above the bylaw requirement (i.e. required 380, supplied 387) and apply these to 400 W Georgia s parking supply. This would amount to a total 1 ote that the Parking Bylaw allows this credit for residential uses downtown but will sometimes also allow this parking credit for commercial uses if deemed appropriate 400 W Georgia Rezoning Transportation Review Draft Letter April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables calculated parking supply of 219 spaces, which would be 16 spaces short of the bylaw requirement. The resulting parking payment-in-lieu fee would be $323,200 with this option Further, given the site constraints at the ground level, Class A loading will have to be accommodated within the underground parkade; while the supply rationale will be described below, the project is looking to provide a total of 5 Class A spaces underground. This would amount to a total of 179 physical parking and Class A loading spaces provided below grade. 3.2 Loading Review Based on the City of Vancouver s Parking Bylaw (Bylaw 6059, Section 5), the proposed development requires a total of 5 Class A loading spaces (all for office uses) and 6 Class B loading spaces (4 for office, and 2 for retail). Based on Bunt s past experience for similar downtown office and retail developments in Vancouver we believe the City s bylaw requirement to be greater than the actual observed demand, particularly for Class B loading needs. In particular, the observed peak loading demand rate for Class A and Class B loading vehicles for mixed-use office towers with ground floor supporting retail is approximately 2.7 vehicles/10,000 sq ft GFA/hour (65% Class A, and 35% Class B). At a target occupancy of 70% (i.e. loading spaces are occupied for 70% of the typical 10-hour work day, 7am 5pm), this would equate to a recommended supply of 5 Class A loading spaces, and 2 Class B loading spaces to achieve this level of efficiency. Therefore, the project is seeking to provide 5 Class A loading spaces below grade in the P1 level of the parkade, and 2 Class B loading spaces at the ground level accessed from the rear lane. It is also intended that these loading spaces would be shared between office and retail uses to allow for more efficient use. To help facilitate this, it is expected the City will require a robust Loading Management Plan (LMP) outlining the protocol for how the loading facilities would be utilized and managed as well as provide a level of indication of scheduling of use throughout a typical day/week. 4. O-SITE CIRCULATIO REVIEW AutoTUR analysis was performed on P1 to P6 parking and ground floor (GF) loading plan layouts. The design vehicle used for the bulk of this analysis was the type P (TAC) and in some cases (i.e. small car spaces), a typical passenger vehicle (Ford Taurus) was tested to ensure site circulation and adequate turning movement space for vehicles circulating the parkade. An SU9 was used as the design vehicle for the Ground Floor Class B loading. Exhibits 4.1 to 4.7 show the circulation movements for P1 to P6 and GF layouts. Parking maneuver diagrams are included in Appendix A. 400 W Georgia Rezoning Transportation Review Draft Letter April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables 58

6 Exhibit 4.2 P2 Turning Analysis - Circulation S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P2_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 11:05, Plotted by Amy Do [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.05 Parking Level P1 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit 4.1 P1 Turning Analysis [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.04 Parking Level P2 from Merrick Architecture dated ] S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P1_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:24, Plotted by Amy Do 59

7 Exhibit 4.4 P4 Turning Analysis - Circulation S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P4_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:43, Plotted by Amy Do Exhibit 4.3 P3 Turning Analysis - Circulation [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.03 Parking Level P3 from Merrick Architecture dated ] [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.02 Parking Level P4 from Merrick Architecture dated ] S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P3_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:34, Plotted by Amy Do 60

8 Exhibit 4.6 P6 Turning Analysis - Circulation S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P6_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 11:53, Plotted by Amy Do [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.01 Parking Level P5 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit 4.5 P5 Turning Analysis - Circulation April 2017 Scale Custom on Letter Prepared by AD [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.00 Parking Level P6 from Merrick Architecture dated ] S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P5_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 11:31, Plotted by Amy Do 61

9 [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.06 Ground Floor from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit 4.7 Loading SU 9 Turning Analysis 5. EXISTIG TRAFFIC & FUTURE TRIP GEERATIO REVIEW 5.1 Existing Traffic Existing vehicle movements at the following nearby intersections are summarized in Exhibit 5.1. West Georgia Street / Homer Street West Georgia Street / orth-south Lane West Georgia Street / Richards Street Robson Street / Richards Street Robson Street / Homer Street ote these volumes are provided for context and will not be analyzed with this study given the City s understanding of existing conditions in the area. The projected site vehicle movements from the next section would be added onto this network relatively equally (i.e. around 20-25% each). 5.2 Site Trip Generation To understand the number of new vehicles trips that will be generated by the proposed redevelopment, Bunt applied trip generation rates obtained in 2016 from a nearby office tower at 401 West Georgia. Trip generation rates for this site were found by surveying the amount of vehicles entering and exiting the parkade during peak hours, and these were reviewed comparative to the buildings GFA, and existing parking supply. As the new office tower is in very close proximity and has similar land uses to this tower (ground floor retail with office space above), the trip rate for the existing building would be representative for projecting expected traffic for 400 W Georgia. Two different trip rates are applied: trips per parking stall and trips per 100 square feet. This provides a range of expected trips for the proposed development at. Table 5.1 summarizes the two trip rates for the proposed redevelopment and the resulting number of vehicle trips expected. Table 5.1: Future Vehicle Trip Generation TRIP RATE TYPE Trip rate based on occupied parking stalls Trip rate based on per 1,000 square feet 1 - VPH Vehicle Trips Per Hour LAD USE Office + Retail Office + Retail UITS 174 parking spaces 366,000 sq ft RATE (VPH 1 /UIT) 0.25 (0.02 in, 0.23 out) PM VEHICLE TRIPS (VPH 1 ) 44 (3 in, 41 out) 92 (8 in, 84 out) As the table shows, the redevelopment is expected to generate in the range of 44 and 92 new vehicle trips during the weekday PM peak hour depending on the. 400 W Georgia Rezoning Transportation Review Draft Letter April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _GF_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 11:16, Plotted by Amy Do 62

10 In addition, a spot count was conducted on April 12 th, 2017 from 3:00 3:30 pm at the existing 400 West Georgia site (Budget Car Rental) to determine the existing site vehicle trips in order to work out the net new vehicle trips on the network. These numbers were subtracted from the trip generation results to determine the net new trips generated. Table 5.2 summarizes the net new trips in the PM Peak hour. TRIP RATE TYPE SOURCE TRIP RATE BASED O PARKIG STALLS TRIP RATE BASED O 100 SQUARE FEET GFA In Out Total In Out Total Existing site Spot count ew Trip generation (Table generated 5.1) trips et new trips 1* * adjusted to the nearest positive number. As the table shows, around net new vehicle trips (two-way) are expected due to the redevelopment when considering the removal of the existing site uses. If the conservative estimate of 76 vehicles were distributed amongst the 4 adjacent intersections noted in Section 5.1, this would represent around 19 vehicle trips (two-way) through each of these intersections. To put this into context, if 19 new vehicle trips were added to the intersection of W Georgia Street and Homer Street (around 2,350 vehicles) this would represent less than a 1% increase in traffic at the intersection and would not be noticeable on the intersection s operations. In summary, the development is expected to have a nominal impact on the adjacent street network. Once the City has released its future plans for Georgia Street in this area with the removal of the Georgia and Dunsmuir Viaducts then the operational assumptions for Georgia Street should be reviewed again. 400 W Georgia Rezoning Transportation Review Draft Letter April 26 th, S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables Site Exhibit 5.1 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 401 W Georgia Transportation Review April 2017 Scale: TS & Richards Street 395 1, Homer Street , West Georgia Street Robson Street Traffic Signal 000 Intersection PM Volumes otes: PM Peak Hour: 4:30-5:30pm Traffic data from VanMaps (2007 or 2011) in: 20 out: 26 S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\5.0 Deliverables\Graphics 63

11 Exhibit A.2 P2 Turning Analysis - Out S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P2_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:30, Plotted by Amy Do [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.04 Parking Level P2 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.1 P2 Turning Analysis - In [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.04 Parking Level P2 from Merrick Architecture dated ] S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P2_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:29, Plotted by Amy Do 64

12 [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.03 Parking Level P3 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.3 P3 Turning Analysis - In [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.03 Parking Level P3 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.4 P3 Turning Analysis - Out S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P3_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:46, Plotted by Amy Do S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P3_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:37, Plotted by Amy Do 65

13 [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.02 Parking Level P4 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.5 P4 Turning Analysis - In [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.02 Parking Level P4 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.6 P4 Turning Analysis - Out S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P4_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 10:57, Plotted by Amy Do S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P4_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 10:54, Plotted by Amy Do 66

14 [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.01 Parking Level P5 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.7 P5 Turning Analysis - In [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.01 Parking Level P5 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.8 P5 Turning Analysis - Out S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P5_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 11:32, Plotted by Amy Do S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P5_TA.dwg 2017/04/25 14:48, Plotted by Amy Do 67

15 [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.00 Parking Level P6 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.9 P6 Turning Analysis - In April 2017 Scale Custom on Letter Prepared by AD [Based on Drawing 1701-A2.00 Parking Level P6 from Merrick Architecture dated ] Exhibit A.10 P6 Turning Analysis - Out S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P6_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 14:17, Plotted by Amy Do S:\PROJECTS\TT\ W. Georgia\4.0 Analysis & Design\AutoTUR\ \ _ _P6_TA.dwg 2017/04/24 14:17, Plotted by Amy Do 68

16 69