Chapter 6. CEE 320 Anne Goodchild. Spring 2008 CEE 320

Similar documents
JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments (I)

Lecture 4: Capacity and Level of Service (LoS) of Freeways Basic Segments. Prof. Responsável: Filipe Moura

FE Review-Transportation-II. D e p a r t m e n t o f C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g U n i v e r s i t y O f M e m p h i s

MULTILANE HIGHWAYS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 21 CONTENTS

Multilane Highways. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Introduction 1

Two Lane Highways Procedures from 2000 Highway Capacity Manual

P07033 US 50 EB Weaving Analysis between El Dorado Hills and Silva Valley Ramp Metering Analysis for US 50 EB On-Ramp at Latrobe Road

Interchange Operations Study

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Transport Modes and Technologies A Walking Tour on Capacity, LOS. Urban Transportation Planning MIT Course 1.252j/11.

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

2016 Congestion Report

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

APPENDICES C APPENDIX C: CALCULATION WORKSHEETS FOR FREEWAY SEGMENTS AND FREEWAY WEAVE ANALYSIS

Transportation Highway Engineering Conference February 24, 2015

CDOT SPF Development and 10 Years of Application. A Practical Approach...

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 FLASHING YELLOW ARROW SIGNALS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

DRAFT FINAL REPORT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANNING OFFICE. on Project. Estimation of Capacities on Florida Freeways

INFLUENCE OF VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT AND DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEM ON KEY TRAFFIC FLOW PARAMETERS ON A GERMAN AUTOBAHN

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Interchange Operations Study MOT (I-75 & Austin Boulevard) ODOT District 7 PID 99213

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 98 Frontage Road Off-Ramp. Cherokee County, SC

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Conventional Approach

Low-Cost Improvements to Express-Highway Bottleneck Locations

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

VDOT 2008 Road and Bridge Standards Section Transition Curves

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation

Motorways Route in Thailand. Sustainable Highway Design

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Horizontal Sight Distance Considerations Freeway and Interchange Reconstruction

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015


4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

FIELD APPLICATIONS OF CORSIM: I-40 FREEWAY DESIGN EVALUATION, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. Michelle Thomas

PENNSYLVANIA STATE FIRE ACADEMY PUMPER - DRIVER/OPERATOR (PDO) SKILL STATIONS. Pumper -Driver / Operator (PDO) Skill Stations

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

Traffic Operation and Safety Analyses of Minimum Speed Limits on Florida Rural Interstate Highways

Traffic Engineering Study

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

COMPARISON OF FREE FLOW SPEED ESTIMATION MODELS

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

Pembina Emerson Border Crossing Interim Measures Microsimulation

State PA* Base Fine. County PA*/10 DNA PA* Offense 10/10 7 5/ % (b,c) I Failure to Obey Traffic Control/Devices at

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum

Appendix E TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Project 2: Traffic and Queuing (updated 28 Feb 2006)

APPENDIX C ROADWAY BEFORE-AND-AFTER STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants

Automated Vehicles: Terminology and Taxonomy

Interchange Justification Report

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS

Reliability Guide for the HCM Concepts & Content

Technical Feasibility Report

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Transcription:

Chapter 6 Freeway Level of Service Anne Goodchild

Definitions Level of Service (LOS) Chief measure of quality of service Describes operational conditions within a traffic stream. Does not include safety Different measures for different facilities Six measures (A through F) Freeway LOS Based on traffic density

Levels of Service LOS A Free-flow operation LOS B Reasonably free flow Ability to maneuver is only slightly restricted Effects of minor incidents still easily absorbed From Highw way Capacity Manual, 200 00

Levels of Service LOS C Speeds at or near FFS Freedom to maneuver is noticeably restricted Queues may form behind any significant blockage. LOS D Speeds decline slightly with increasing flows Density increases more quickly Freedom to maneuver is more noticeably limited Minor incidents create queuing From Highw way Capacity Manual, 200 00

Levels of Service LOS E Operation near or at capacity No usable gaps in the traffic stream Operations extremely volatile Any disruption causes queuing LOS F Breakdown in flow Queues form behind breakdown points Demand > capacity From Highw way Capacity Manual, 200 00

Definitions Freeway: A divided highway with full control of access and two or more lanes for the exclusive use of traffic in each direction. Freeway Capacity: The maximum sustained 15-min flow rate, expressed in passenger cars per hour per lane, that can be accommodated by a uniform freeway segment under prevailing traffic and roadway conditions in one direction of flow.

Definitions Flow Characteristics Undersaturated Traffic flow that is unaffected by upstream or downstream conditions. Queue discharge Traffic flow that has just passed through a bottleneck. Oversaturated Traffic flow that is influenced by the effects of a downstream bottleneck. From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Definitions Free-Flow Flow Speed Free-Flow Speed (FFS) The mean speed of passenger cars that can be accommodated under low to moderate flow rates on a uniform freeway segment under prevailing roadway and traffic conditions. Factors affecting free-flowflow speed Lane width Lateral clearance Number of lanes Interchange density Geometric design

Definitions Passenger car equivalents Trucks and RVs behave differently Baseline is a freeway with all passenger cars Traffic is expressed in passenger cars per lane per hour (pc/ln/hr or pcplph) Driver population Non-commuters suck more at driving They may affect capacity Capacity Corresponds to LOS E and v/c = 1.0

LOS Calculation Does not consider Special lanes reserved for a particular type of vehicle (HOV, truck, climbing, etc.) Extended bridge and tunnel segments Segments near a toll plaza Facilities with FFS < 55 mi/h or > 75 mi/h Demand conditions greatly in excess of capacity Influence of downstream blockages or queuing Posted speed limit Extent of police enforcement Intelligent transportation system features Capacity-enhancing effects of ramp metering

BFFS Input BFFS Adjustment Lane width Number of lanes Interchange density Lateral clearance Input Geometric Data Measured FFS or BFFS Volume Measured FFS Input Volume Adjustment t PHF Number of lanes Driver population Heavy vehicles Freeway LOS Adjust for temporal variation Compute FFS Compute flow rate Define speed-flow curve Compute density using flow rate and speed Determine speed using speed-flow curve Determine LOS

LOS Criteria fo From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 r Basic Freeway Segments

Determining FFS Measure FFS in the field Low to moderate traffic conditions Use a baseline and adjust it (BFFS) FFS = BFFS f LW f LC f N f ID FFS = free-flow speed (mph) BFFS = base free-flow fl speed, 70 mph (urban), 75 mph (rural) f LW f LC = adjustment for lane width (mph) = adjustment for right-shoulder lateral clearance (mph) f N f ID = adjustment for number of lanes (mph) = adjustment for interchange density (mph)

Lane Width Adjustment (f LW ) Base condition (f LW = 0) Average width of 12 ft. or wider across all lanes From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Lateral Clearance Adjustment (f LC ) Base condition (f LC = 0) 6 ft. or greater on right side 2 ft. or greater on the median or left side From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Number of Lanes Adjustment (f N ) Base condition (f N = 0) 5 or more lanes in one direction Do not include HOV lanes f N = 0 for all rural freeway segments From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Interchange Density Adjustment (f IC ) Freeway LOS Base condition (f IC = 0) 0.5 interchanges per mile (2-mile spacing) Interchange defined as having at least one on-ramp Determined over 6-mile segment From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

BFFS Input Input Geometric Data Measured FFS or BFFS Volume Freeway LOS BFFS Adjustment Lane width Number of lanes Interchange density Lateral clearance Measured FFS Input Volume Adjustment t PHF Number of lanes Driver population Heavy vehicles Compute FFS Compute flow rate Define speed-flow curve Compute density using flow rate and speed Determine speed using speed-flow curve Determine LOS

Determining Flow Rate Adjust hourly volumes to get pc/ln/hr v p = PHF V N f HV f p v p V PHF N f HV = 15-minute passenger-car equivalent flow rate (pcphpl) = hourly volume (veh/hr), highest total one direction = peak hour factor = number of lanes in one direction = heavy-vehicle vehicle adjustment factor f P = driver population adjustment factor

Peak Hour Factor (PHF) Typical values 0.80 to 0.95 PHF V = V 15 4 V = hourly volume (veh/hr) for hour of analysis 15 = maxiumum 15-min. flow rate within hour of analysis 4 = Number of 15-min. periods per hour V 15

Heavy Vehicle Adjustment (f HV ) Base condition (f HV = 1.0) No heavy vehicles Heavy vehicle = trucks, buses, RVs Otherwise: Two-step process Determine passenger-car equivalents (E T ) Determine f HV

Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Extended segments method Determine the type of terrain and select E T No one grade of 3% or more is longer than 0.25 miles OR No one grade of less than 3% is longer than 0.5 miles From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Passenger-Car Equivalents (E T ) Specific grades method Any grade of 3% or more that is longer than 0.25 miles OR Any grade of less than 3% that is longer than 0.5 miles From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Equivalent tables for RVs From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Determine f HV f HV = 1 1 + P + ( E 1 ) + P ( E 1 ) + T T R R f HV = Heavy vehicle adjustment factor E T, E R = Passenger-car equivalents for trucks/buses and RVs P T, P R = Proportion of trucks/buses and RVs in traffic stream E t Greater than 1.5

Driver Population Adjustment (f P ) Base condition (f P = 1.0) Most drivers are familiar with the route Commuter drivers Typical values between 0.85 and 1.00 v p = PHF V N f HV f p

BFFS Input Input Geometric Data Measured FFS or BFFS Volume Freeway LOS BFFS Adjustment Lane width Number of lanes Interchange density Lateral clearance Measured FFS Input Volume Adjustment t PHF Number of lanes Driver population Heavy vehicles Compute FFS Compute flow rate Define speed-flow curve Compute density using flow rate and speed Determine speed using speed-flow curve Determine LOS

Define Speed-Flow Curve Select a Speed-Flow curve based on FFS From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Determine Average PC Speed (S) Freeway LOS Use v p and FFS curve to find average passenger car speed (S) From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Determine Average PC Speed (S) Freeway LOS For 70 < FFS 75 mph AND (3400 30FFS) < v p 2400 S = FFS FFS 160 3 v p + 30FFS 3400 30FFS 1000 2.6 For 55 < FFS 70 mph AND (3400 30FFS) < v p (1700 + 10FFS) 2.6 1 v p + 30FFS 3400 S = FFS ( 7FFS 340) 9 40FFS 1700 For 55 < FFS 75 mph AND v p < (3400 30FFS) S = FFS Use equation instead of curve

Determine Density Calculate density using: D = v p S D v p S = density (pc/mi/ln) = flow rate (pc/hr/ln) = average passenger-car speed (mph) Use equation instead of curve

Determine LOS LOS Cri teria for Basic Freeway Segments Use table instead of curve From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000

Determine LOS

LOS Criteria fo From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 r Basic Freeway Segments