RAILROAD TANK CARS Safely Transpor ng Hazardous Materials

Similar documents
BEFORE THE PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

Crude Oil by Rail Ron Hynes FRA Office of Safety Director, Office of Technical Oversight

NTSB Railroad Hazardous Materials Safety Recommendations Status Presentation to the Transportation Research Board, February 4, 2016

Risk Assessment Checklist for Wheelchair Transportation in Vehicles

Transportation and Transfer

Bee Access Products. Aluminum Parapet Clamp. Specifications. Description. Manual M

Port Terminal Railroad Association. Committed to Safety and Service

Accident Data Recorder. Accident Data Recorder

IN YOUR COMMUNITY East Vancouver Port Lands Committee January 2015

U.S. Rail Crude Oil Traffic

CN in Your Community British Columbia Photo: Squamish, 1BC

Boyd Stephenson Director of Hazmat & Driver Licensing American Trucking Associations

Operating & Safety Manual

Why is a towboat called a towboat when it pushes the barges?

RAIL EQUIPMENT OUTLOOK: THE FTR PERSPECTIVE

ATD 3-Ton Jack Pack. Jack Size (L x W x H) Saddle Diameter Net Weight

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS BUREAU OF EXPLOSIVES

Tank Car Safety and Security NextGen Project to the Present

Government of Canada Hopper Car Fleet 2011 Annual Report

U.S. Rail Crude Oil Traffic

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Volume 13 Dec, Pleasant Valley Drive * Springboro, OH * * (937)

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Parts Catalog Genuine RAVO parts, right quality, right fit

GATX Corporation. Railcar Update. David Horwitz Vice President, Sales East Region. Todd Moore Corporate Account Manager.

Ethanol Growth and Rail Safety

February highlights (click links to advance to any sec on)

Petrochemical Industry

Government of Canada Hopper Car Fleet

High Temp. Mold Series HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS SPRINGS

THANK YOU! RETAIL CUSTOMER S RESPONSIBILITY

Moving Crude Oil by Rail

Mechanical Inspections and Wheel Impact Load Detector Standards for Trains Transporting Large Amounts of Class 3 Flammable Liquids

The World Has Changed Hazmat Shipping Requirements

One million miles is no barrier for our bogie systems.

T2 Mini Series MINI NITROGEN GAS SPRINGS IDEAL FOR: REPLACING COIL SPRINGS STOCK LIFTING & EJECTION

Street Sleeper III Air Cleaner Kit for 99 Up Twin Cam 9605

Integrated Risk Management Framework for Improving the Safety of Hazardous Materials Transportation by Rail

Street Sleeper III Air Cleaner Kit for '08 UP Touring and Trike 9606

Status of North American Flammable Liquid Fleet as March 31, May 25, 2018

Rail Risk: Severe Fires and the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

QUEBEC NORTH SHORE & LABRADOR RAILWAY COMPANY

BALANCE EVR SYSTEMS:

ExecuƟ ve Summary Report OrganizaƟ on 2017 New Mexico DayƟ me Occupant Seat Belt Survey 2017 New Mexico Nighƫ me Occupant Seat Belt Survey

HOOKS HOOKS. VANGUARD STEEL LTD.

ANNUAL REPORT OF NON-ACCIDENT RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTED BY RAIL 2013

Into (and Out of?) the Valley

1. Ethanol Shipments by Rail Have Had an Enviable Safety Record

A Review of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration s Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis

LED Emergency Drivers

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

The Municipal Perspective on CBR (and Other Flammable Hazmat)

Thomson Engineering Design Ltd. Drag Clamp. Operator s Instructions. Original Document in English Language. Issue 2 March 2015

Power Distribu on, Management and Control of Lithium Ba eries

Applica on Note 109. Switch for Smart Locks. Relevant Products: Introduc on. Smart Lock System Diagram. Features and Benefits

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT YEARS OF TRANSPORTATION REGULATION

Log Truck Accidents in the United States

Traffic Safety Facts

Outline. Purpose. TDG Regulatory Update

2016 MASTER CATALOGUE

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Preventing Road Accidents and Injuries for the Safety of Employees Case Study: ALSA FACTFILE. Company: ALSA

Script. Visual. Narrative. Module 6C Carrier Requirements (Rail)

Camden Composite Doors

Huntington Mechanical Labs, Inc.

TIME TASK FORCE. Guidelines for the Mitigation of Motor Vehicle Fluid Spills at Crash Scenes (Non-Cargo)

Maintenance Manual. Automated Fuel Maintenance System FUEL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL

Transportation and Transfer

Office of the Mayor City of Los Angeles MAYOR VILLARAIGOSA LAUNCHES LANDMARK CLEAN TRUCK PROGRAM TO CLEAN LOS ANGELES' AIR

Vertical Loads from North American Rolling Stock for Bridge Design and Rating

Cleaner Safer Trucking

Derailments and Derailment Prevention

TRIO APP & APS SERIES IMPACT CRUSHERS. High E ciency Crushing Solu ons

Livingston County Hazardous Material Flow Study August 2018

Hours of Service (HOS)

LDW-HK. Deadweight Tester / Pressure Balance Hydraulic & Compact Design

BLOCKS VANGUARD STEEL LTD. BLOCKS.

Stronger road safety. in South Australia. Presented by Tamra Fedojuk Senior Statistician Road Safety Policy

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Types Of Containers. Introduction. Multi Mode. Standard. The Standard International Box. Emergency Response Solutions

Coal Mine Safety Shortchanged by Years of Budget Cuts

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

THE PARTNERSHIP OF RAIL & COAL MOVING AHEAD 2014 RMCMI ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2014

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Rocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC

Flammability of Bakken Crude Oil: Dangerous. Rail Cargo Even When Empty. (by Dr. Gerard Macri, Expert Witness)

Enhancing School Bus Safety and Pupil Transportation Safety

Rules Respecting Key Trains and Key Routes

NYC s GREEN Fuel Supplier... March 2010

Table of Contents Air Brake Tests Basic Conductor/Certification Course Basic Conductor/Mechanical (Combination Package) Basic Hazardous Materials

Biofuel Market Factors

Vacuum Assisted Oil Mist Eliminators Reciprocating Engines and Turbines

Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

NORTH COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL OPERATIONS

Safety and Green Vehicle Performance Rating

Transcription:

RAILROAD TANK CARS Safely Transpor ng Hazardous Materials A Publica on of the Railroad Tank Car Safety Research & Test Project September 2013 Every year, tank cars carry nearly 2 million shipments including over 150 million tons of hazardous materials on the North American rail system. Despite the magnitude of this opera on, railroads have an outstanding track record in safely delivering hazardous materials many of which are chemicals that are essen al in our daily lives. In fact, more than 99.997 percent of hazardous materials arrive at their des na on without a release caused by an accident. This performance is a result of dedica on to con nual improvements in the design and use of tank cars through the collec ve efforts of tank car manufacturers, tank car owners, railroads, shippers, regulators and other partners. Railroads factor in safety and security when selec ng routes used for the transporta on of hazardous materials depending upon the risk. Figure 1 Railcars Releasing Hazardous Materials in Accidents, as a Percentage of Shipments 0.01800% Percent of Shipments Losing Lading 0.01600% 0.01400% 0.01200% 0.01000% 0.00800% 0.00600% 0.00400% 0.00200% 0.00000% 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

STATISTICS PROVE TANK CAR SAFETY Sta s cs show that railroads provide the safest, most efficient and most prac cal way to transport hazardous materials. In 2012, North American railroads safely delivered over 2.44 million carloads of hazardous chemicals and fuels. Only 46 railcars leaked in train accidents in 2012, a decrease of 80% since 1978 s peak of 232. The extent of the improvement is understated, considering that during the same me frame hazardous materials rail shipments increased by 130 percent. Figure 1 above shows the percentage of the railroads hazardous materials traffic these incidents represent about one release per 53,100 shipments in 2012. While any loss of lading (freight car cargo) is undesirable, it also should be understood that many of these incidents involve losses of small amounts. Non accident tank car releases also have decreased by 54 percent since 1996, when a program to prevent these incidents was ini ated across the North American rail system. This reduc on can be credited to a focused effort and improvements in securement, inspec on and maintenance prac ces. Addi onally, between 1990 and 2012, there were 21 hazardous material related deaths as a result of rail transporta on incidents. Note that, in the same period, trucks hauling hazardous materials were involved in incidents that claimed 316 lives (Figure 2 on the next page). Note: The counts of incidents and casual es presented in this brochure do not encompass 2013, and in par cular, do not account for the July crude oil accident in Lac Mégan c, Quebec. At the me of the brochure s publica on, industry and regulatory organiza ons are assessing the implica ons of what can be learned from this accident. Despite the serious nature of this incident, two facts remain true. The industry is tenacious and proac ve about improving the safety performance of tank cars, as exemplified by the adop on of a package of safety improvements for new cars carrying crude oil and other flammable liquids in 2010 and 2011, thus reducing the chance of punctures and fires in accidents. Also, the rate of hazardous materials releases con nues to decline, and DOT/TC 111 class tank cars survive a large majority of accidents with no release of lading, as do all tank cars. 2

Figure 2 350 300 US Fatalities Due to Hazardous Materials Releases, All Commodities, by Mode, 1990-2012 316 250 Deaths 200 150 100 50 0 Highway 21 Railroads Figure 3 shows the trend in hazmat incidents over me for highway versus rail. Figure 3 Hazardous Materials Releases, by Mode 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 Rail Highway Releases 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 3

HAZMATS: ESSENTIAL TO OUR DAILY LIVES Our society depends on chemicals in nearly every facet of daily life. Some 2,500 commodi es that the U.S. Department of Transporta on (DOT) defines as hazardous must be transported from one place to another, o en in large quanes. These include fuels, fer lizers, disinfectants and cleansers, along with chemicals for foods, glass, life saving medicines and the weapons and muni ons required by the military. For example, freight trains carry the chlorine used to purify more than half of the na on s water supplies and in the manufacturing of 85 percent of all pharmaceu cals. Tank cars also carry non hazardous economic staples such as corn syrup, food products and clay slurry used in manufacturing paper. THE RAILROAD TANK CAR SAFETY RESEARCH AND TEST PROJECT In 1970, the Railway Progress Ins tute, the predecessor to the Railway Supply Ins tute, teamed up with the Associa on of American Railroads (AAR) to create the Railroad Tank Car Safety Research and Test Project (Tank Car Safety Project). Since then, the founding partners have invested more than $20 million in the Tank Car Safety Project, while also inves ng significantly in safety improvements to the tank car fleet. These investments have yielded vast improvements in safety research, modifica ons to exis ng tank cars, construc on of new tank cars to meet improved specifica ons, and reduc ons in derailment rates. The Tank Car Safety Project created, maintains and con nually adds to a set of data describing damage to tank cars in train accidents. This informa on is available to industry researchers to support studies of poten al enhancements to tank car construc on, designs and materials. These data allow the performance of various features to be quan fied and improvement ini a ves to be priori zed. The Tank Car Safety Project also conducts tests and other studies to provide the industry with the informa on it needs to con nue improving upon an already excellent safety record in the transporta on of hazardous materials. Recommenda ons from the Tank Car Safety Project have provided the U.S. Department of Transporta on, Transport Canada and the AAR Tank Car Commi ee with the quan ta ve informa on needed to adopt effec ve new regula ons and standards. The most recent examples are in the development of new standards for tank cars carrying Toxic Inhala on Hazard (TIH) materials, ethanol products and crude oil. A TRACK RECORD OF SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS A poten al danger of transpor ng hazardous materials was highlighted in the 1960s and early 1970s, when a number of rail incidents resulted in chain reac on explosions of large pressurized tank cars carrying liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) that were exposed to fires at accident scenes. The Tank Car Safety Project teamed up with the AAR and the Federal Railroad Administra on (FRA) to analyze these accidents and make changes to ensure tank car safety. All LPG cars were ou i ed with the following safety devices, which include: 4

Shelf couplers to prevent car couplers from overriding one another and puncturing the ends, or heads, of tank car tanks in a derailment or sudden stop Head shields fashioned of half inch steel and applied to the heads of tank car tanks to protect against head punctures Thermal protec on, a fire resistant insula on that helps keep the tank s lading cool enough to delay or prevent tank failures in fires Today, tank cars carrying the most hazardous ladings are equipped with these safety devices. A rail industry study found that in the first six years a er retrofi ng LPG cars, there was a 94 percent reduc on in punctures to tank heads, a 93 percent improvement in preven ng fireinduced ruptures of tanks, and a 67 percent decrease in shell punctures. Other safety improvements and upgrades include: Substan ally stronger tank cars for carrying Toxic Inhala on Hazard (TIH) commodi es Substan ally stronger new tank cars for carrying various liquid commodi es, including ethanol and crude oil, incorpora ng thicker, stronger tank shells and head shields, and top fi ngs protec on to protect these fi ngs when the car rolls over in a derailment. Substan ally stronger tank cars for transpor ng chemicals with environmental hazards, with similar improvements for protec on in derailments Bo om fi ngs protec on, which helps keep the fi ngs on the bo oms of tank cars from leaking during an accident Steel with improved low temperature proper es for tougher tanks Appropriate speeds for trains of high concern and enhanced track maintenance on routes of high concern Track side equipment defect detectors installed at a higher than usual density on certain routes Best prac ces for loading and unloading tank cars Inspec ons of tank car stub sills the components that a ach the coupling and cushioning systems to the tank at regular intervals Surge suppression devices on all new tank cars with pressure relief devices 5

More robust rupture discs for pressure relief devices on tank cars More safety features for heavier tank cars, designed to carry more lading To address losses of hazardous lading that are not the result of accidents, the AAR spearheaded the launch of the North American Non accident Release Preven on Task Force in 1995. Nonaccident Releases (NARs) are usually less than 10 gallons and have caused no fatali es since the 1960s. Nevertheless, they are releases of hazardous materials and the industry works diligently to prevent them. Since the incep on of the North American program to heighten awareness of rules and best prac ces, NARs have declined by 54 percent. But while the industry is proud of its accomplishments, it does not consider the job done. Safety improvements, including evolving standards and designs and con nuing research, will be advanced vigorously as long as tank cars are carrying hazardous materials on North American rails. Figure 8 iden fies the main components of a tank car, to illustrate where features such as head shields and top fi ngs protec on are installed, for be er damage resistance. Figure 8 6

THE ASSOCIATION PARTNERS The Railway Supply Ins tute (RSI) and the RSI Commi ee on Tank Cars The Railway Supply Ins tute Commi ee on Tank Cars (CTC) works closely with its members, federal agencies in the U.S. and Canada, and the railroad industry promo ng safe design and opera on of railway tank cars in North America. The CTC includes the principal owners, builders and lessors of tank cars in North America. They regularly review tank car requirements through par cipa on on the AAR Tank Car Commi ee and other groups. The CTC is at the forefront of the latest research to improve tank car safety and represents tank car manufacturers in federal, legisla ve and regulatory ma ers regarding tank car safety, security and opera ons. The Associa on of American Railroads (AAR) Founded in 1934, the Associa on of American Railroads (AAR) represents the major freight railroads of the United States, Canada and Mexico, as well as Amtrak and several short line, regional and commuter railroads. AAR member companies operate more than 140,000 miles of track, including over 82 percent of track mileage in the United States, employ over 95 percent of the workers, and generate over 97 percent of the freight revenue in the U.S. The AAR works to make the rails safer, more efficient and more produc ve by advancing sound public policy, establishing standards for equipment and opera ons, and promo ng a seamless exchange of informa on among railroads, customers and suppliers. 7