TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

Similar documents
2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Vanpool in Atlanta: Accommodating a 10% Mode Shift for Coca-Cola. Prepared for CEE 6625 by Calvin Clark Daejin Kim Yu Chen

Needs and Community Characteristics

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

7 Mass Transit. 7.1 Existing Conditions. 7.2 Transit

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Starting and Growing Rural Vanpool Programs: From Financing to Vehicle Procurement

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Transit Access Study

Treasure Island Toll Policy, Affordability and Transit Pass Programs. TIMMA Board Meeting December 11, 2018

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Executive Summary October 2013

Parking Management Strategies

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. October 2014

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Transit System Technical Report

Oakland County Board of Commissioners General Government Committee April 23, SMART Services in Oakland County

Regional Priority Ranking Recommendations for WSDOT Consolidated Grant Program

Middle Georgia Transportation Executive Committee. September 27, 2017

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

Making Mobility Better, Together

Community Outreach Meetings

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

Small Urban & Rural Transit Center

SOCIO-ECONOMIC and LAND USE DATA

Efficient Transportation Six Case Stories

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

MetroExpress Improvements

SouthWest Transit s Microtransit Service 2018 APTA State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Wednesday, August 15 th

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Milwaukee County Transit System

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Image from:

Parking Management Element

Reducing Cost and Emissions with Eco-Driving for Transit Vehicles Yanzhi Ann Xu Hanyan Ann Li Haobing Liu Michael O. Rodgers Randall Guensler

Paratransit Overview O & O Presentation January 11, 2018

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHARED USE MOBILITY SERVICES IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Incentives for Green Fleets

TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT SWEEP ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS: COLORADO CASE STUDIES

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

Project Summary Table

Qualcomm Stadium Redevelopment

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. January 7, 2015

Transcription:

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

THE TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (TDP) WILL IDENTIFY: TRANSIT NEEDS AND DESIRES OF THE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY AND AGENCY STAKEHOLDER S EXPECTATIONS FOR BARTOW COUNTY TRANSIT (BCT) TRANSIT SERVICE TYPES THAT ARE VIABLE OPTIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY REASONABLE FUNDING ALTERNATIVES

COLLABORATE WITH COMMUNITY TO UNDERSTAND TRANSIT NEEDS REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DATA IDENTIFY POTENTIAL TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS

Source: Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC)

IN THE CARTERSVILLE AREA, THERE IS ONE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE (TAZ) WITH A RESIDENTIAL DENSITY OF 4 6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 16

In the same area, there are eight TAZs with employment densities of 10 25 jobs/acre. THERE ARE EIGHT TAZS IN CARTERSVILLE WITH EMPLOYMENT DENSITIES OF 10 25 JOBS/ACRE. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 16

Source: US Census Bureau Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) Origin Destination Employment Statistics (LODES)

FORTY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BARTOW COUNTY ALSO LIVE IN THE COUNTY ABOUT SIXTY PERCENT OF WORKERS COMMUTE FROM NEARBY COUNTIES, THE LARGEST INFLUX COMING FROM COBB COUNTY MORE THAN 26 PERCENT OF WORKERS FROM BARTOW COUNTY THAT COMMUTE TO OTHER COUNTIES COMMUTE TO COBB COUNTY

POPULATION DENSITIES HIGHEST IN CENTRAL CARTERSVILLE TRANSIT TARGET MARKET ANALYSIS INDICATES PROPENSITY FOR TRANSIT IN CARTERSVILLE AND SE BARTOW COUNTY NEAR ACWORTH COMMUTE PATTERNS INDICATE MOST ACTIVITY WITHIN COUNTY AND WITH COBB COUNTY PUBLIC INPUT INDICATED: NEED TO LINK LOW INCOME RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO EMPLOYMENT, MEDICAL, EDUCATION AND SHOPPING ACTIVITY CENTERS NEED MOBILITY OPTIONS IN SE AREA OF COUNTY

Demand Responsive Like existing Bartow Transit Trip is reserved in advance Typically use small buses Local or Fixed Route Express Bus Service / Park and Ride Lots Like Cobb or MARTA Operates on a fixed route and schedule Operates on local streets, not interstate highways May use small or large buses Like GRTA Express Operates from one pickup location to one destination (such as from a park and ride lot to downtown Atlanta) Typically use large coach buses like a Greyhound bus

LOCAL FIXED ROUTE: THREE ROUTES OPERATING ON A 60 MINUTE FREQUENCY CAPITAL INVESTMENT OF FOUR BUSES WITH THREE FOR OPERATIONS AND ONE SPARE UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF THREE TRANSFER CENTERS COMPLEMENTARY DEMAND RESPONSE ADA PARATRANSIT SERVICE

COMMUTER SERVICE OPERATING ON A 30 MINUTE FREQUENCY CAPITAL INVESTMENT OF TWO BUSES FOR OPERATIONS AND USE ONE EXISTING VEHICLE AS SPARE UNIT REVERSE COMMUTE SERVICE TO/FROM ALLATOONA AREA TO CARTERSVILLE

Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Program Elements Adminstration - $40,000 - - $40,000 $20,000 $20,000 - - - $20,000 Total - $40,000 - - $40,000 $20,000 $20,000 - - - $20,000 Administration - $41,200 - - $41,200 $20,600 $20,600 - - - $20,600 Local Route Service 82,620 $426,962 $1.00 $82,620 $344,342 $275,402 $68,850 $45 $45 - $68,895 Commuter Service 29,880 $154,413 $2.00 $59,760 $94,653 $75,109 $18,777 $383 $383 - $19,161 Paratransit Service 1,652 $142,321 $2.00 $3,305 $139,016 $109,947 $27,487 $791 $791 - $28,278 Total 114,152 $764,896 - $145,685 $619,211 $481,058 $135,714 $1,219 $1,219 - $136,934 Administration - $42,436 - - $42,436 $21,218 $21,218 - - - $21,218 Local Route Service 86,751 $439,771 $1.00 $86,751 $353,020 $281,757 $70,439 $412 $412 - $70,851 Commuter Service 31,374 $159,046 $2.00 $62,748 $96,298 $76,843 $19,211 $122 $122 - $19,333 Paratransit Service 1,735 $146,590 $2.00 $3,470 $143,120 $114,242 $28,560 $159 $159 - $28,719 Total 119,860 $787,842 - $152,969 $634,873 $494,059 $139,428 $693 $693 - $140,121 Administration - $43,709 - - $43,709 $21,855 $21,855 - - - $21,855 Local Route Service 91,089 $452,964 $1.00 $91,089 $361,875 $288,112 $72,028 $867 $867 - $72,895 Commuter Service 32,943 $163,817 $2.00 $65,885 $97,932 $78,345 $19,586 $0 $0 - $19,586 Paratransit Service 1,822 $150,988 $2.00 $3,644 $147,344 $116,475 $29,119 $875 $875 - $29,994 Total 125,853 $811,478 - $160,617 $650,860 $504,787 $142,588 $1,743 $1,743 - $144,330 Administration - $45,020 - - $45,020 $0 $0 $22,510 $22,510 - $0 Local Route Service 95,643 $466,553 $1.00 $95,643 $370,910 $0 $0 $185,455 $185,455 - $185,455 Commuter Service 34,590 $168,731 $2.00 $69,180 $99,551 $0 $0 $49,776 $49,776 - $49,776 Paratransit Service 1,913 $155,518 $2.00 $3,826 $151,692 $0 $0 $75,846 $75,846 - $75,846 Total 132,146 $835,822 - $168,648 $667,173 $0 $0 $333,587 $311,077 - $311,077 Administration - $46,371 - - $46,371 $0 $0 $23,186 $23,186 - $23,186 Local Route Service 100,425 $480,550 $1.00 $100,425 $380,125 $0 $0 $190,062 $190,062 - $190,062 Commuter Service 36,319 $173,793 $2.00 $72,639 $101,154 $0 $0 $50,577 $50,577 - $50,577 Paratransit Service 2,009 $160,183 $2.00 $4,017 $156,166 $0 $0 $78,083 $78,083 - $78,083 Total 138,753 $860,897 - $177,081 $683,816 $0 $0 $341,908 $341,908 - $341,908 Administration Est. Annual Riderahip 1 - Operating Cost 2 $47,762 Average Fare (Est.) Fare Revenue - - Total Subsidy Federal Source (CMAQ) 3 $47,762 $0 $0 $23,881 $23,881 - $23,881 Local Route Service 105,446 $494,967 $1.00 $105,446 $389,521 $0 $0 $194,760 $194,760 - $194,760 Commuter Service 38,135 $179,007 $2.00 $76,271 $102,736 $0 $0 $51,368 $51,368 - $51,368 Paratransit Service 2,109 $164,989 $2.00 $4,218 $160,771 $0 $0 $80,385 $80,385 - $80,385 Total 145,691 $886,725 - $185,935 $700,790 $0 $0 $350,395 $350,395 - $350,395 CMAQ Local Share Federal Source (5307) 4 5307 Local Share State Share Total Local Share Notes: 1. Ridership estimate for Fixed Route assumes 9 passengers per hour and annual increase of 5% annually and Paratransit assumes ridership of 2% of Local Route service 2. Operating Cost assumes $46.51 per revenue hour and includes estimated 3% CPI annual increase 3. Federal contribution under CMAQ Program is 80% of operating costs for three years 4. Federal contribution under 5307 Program is 50% of operating costs with 50% local match

MARKETING INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) APPLICATIONS SERVICE MONITORING NATIONAL TRANSIT DATABASE (NTD) REPORTING PROTOCOL

CONSIDER TCC COMMITTEE INPUT PRESENT TO CBMPO POLICY COMMITTEE ON MAY 3, 2017 FINALIZE NEW SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

CARTERSVILLE BARTOW MPO TOM SILLS 770 607 6265 sillst@bartowga.org BARTOW COUNTY TRANSIT WELDON DUDLEY 770 387 5165 dudleyw@bartowga.org AECOM PROJECT MANAGER CHIP BURGER 404 946 9505 chip.burger@aecom.com PROJECT WEBSITE http://www.bartowga.org/departments/community_development/mpo/i ndex.php