Metalized Reflective Mulch for New Citrus PlantingsFrom Planting to Harvest in Less Than. Three Years

Similar documents
Early Season Control of Citrus Leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella (Stainton) Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Trial Report: Bell Pepper Variety Evaluation Spring 2017

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Calibration of Chemical Applicators Used in Vegetables1

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Switchgrass plot following the 2011 harvest at Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, Streeter, ND.

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

Nov (16S-CORT-SOY-08) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 15 Purdue Weed Science. Xtend Soybean System Compared to Competitor.

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

(TURF2002) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 2 University of Georgia, CES Crabgrass Control in Bermudagrass with Preemergence Herbicides.

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Michael A. Deliberto, Michael E. Salassi and Brian M. Hilbun

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Sumagic (Uniconazole) for Growth Control of Ornamental Kale (Brassica oleracea Nagoya Mix )

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

I~I. Horticulture Series No. 631

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

Planting Date: Planting Method: Broadcast Rate: 10 lb/1000 sq ft

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

EVALUATION OF REDUCED RISK INSECTICIDES FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN ENGLISH WALNUTS 2005

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

(11 BAS SB D9F Get the Most) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center. General Trial Information. Trial Location.

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Drip In PC Pressure Compensating Dripline

2 CGA WG 10 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 3 CGA WG 12 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 4 CGA WG 7 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a

Michael A. Deliberto and Brian M. Hilbun

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

Concord Fruit Thinning: Using Vine Biology and Mechanized Management to Address Market Demands in New York

2014 Nebraska Dry Edible Bean Variety Trials, Jim Schild, Extension Educator Robert Hawley, Extension Technician Gary Stone, Extension Educator

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

Corn Yield Trials 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.

Aquaponics Business Planning PRESENTER: PAUL BARRETT

2010 Projected Commodity Costs And Returns Cotton, Soybeans, Corn, Grain Sorghum and Wheat Production in Louisiana Kenneth W.

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Smooth Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass with Pendulum Formulations

Triticale and Rye Forage

Citrus Herbicide Boom Sprayer Calibration 1

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Mini Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial Results 2018

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

MSU Weed Science Research Program. General Trial Information. Personnel. Pest Description

TREASURE VALLEY IRRIGATION CONFERENCE

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

Drip irrigation on cotton. Increased yield with less water. cotton

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

Southern Illinois University

Crop Description. Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 17/Jun/2003

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED ***

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

University of GA Coop Ext Service

Influence of AMS on Drift Reduction Antagonisms.

Company presentation Stefanie Lück. Agrartest GmbH Palmbachstr Aarbergen Germany

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Citrus: World Markets and Trade

Economic and Commodity Market Outlook

Wheat Marketing Situation

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Oct (16S-TPAC-CORN-16) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 13 Purdue Weed Science. One Pass vs. Two Pass Programs for Conventional Till Corn

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Olive drip irrigation. Optimise production and safeguard typicality. olive tree

9/14/2009 (C39 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia Twelve inch GR Palmer amaranth response to burndown herbicides.

Smooth Crabgrass Control in 'KY 31' Tall Fescue with Pendulum Formulations

2012 Dry Edible Bean Variety Trials, Scottsbluff and Mitchell Ag Labs Jim Schild, Extension Educator Robert Hawley, Extension Technician

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche Agrochimiche e delle Produzioni Animali Sezione Scienze Agronomiche

1/Jun/2005 (03-PPAC-CORN-BURC) Site Description Page 1 of 10 Purdue University Burcucumber control in corn

High Plains Root-Knot Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016

Dealer Product Catalog Rivulis. Irrigation. Israel

General Trial Information Study Director: Dustin Johnson Title: Research Associate Investigator: Dr. Bill Johnson Title: Professor

POP Diesel Report on Carbon Balance of Growing Jatropha and Castor in Savannah Grassland

Transcription:

Metalized Reflective Mulch for New Citrus PlantingsFrom Planting to Harvest in Less Than Three Years 2017 Florida Citrus Show January 26, 2017 by Robert C. Adair, Jr. Executive Director Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability, Inc.

Research Team Members Dr. Phil A. Stansly, UF/IFAS SWFREC Dr. Alan L. Wright, UF/IFAS IRREC Dr. Mark A. Ritenour, UF/IFAS IRREC Dr. Brian J. Boman, UF/IFAS IRREC Dr. Scott Croxton, Nichino America, Inc. Mr. Jerry Britt, UF/IFAS IRREC Mr. Matthew Adair, Fla. Research Center Mr. Pat Hall, Fla. Research Center

What is MRM MRM is an acronym for Metalized Reflective Mulch. The brand of MRM used in this trial is called Shine N' Ripe XL and is made by Imaflex and was developed especially for use in citrus. It is a heavy duty 3 mil film coated with a protected, reflective layer of aluminum that reflects >80% of solar radiation including: Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR), UV light, and Infrared Radiation for > 3 years.

Project Goals-- To Determine the Benefits of Compost and MRM On Newly Planted Grapefruit Trees for: Repellency of Asian Citrus Psyllids Tree Growth rates Crop Yield Fruit Size Juice Quality Cost of Installation Production Costs, Revenue and Return

Layout, Treatments & Caretaking 7½ 50 wide Double Beds (Indian River Cty.) Planting Density 145 trees/acre (12 x 25 ) 3 Treatments (Bare Ground, Compost & Metalized Reflective Mulch (MRM) 5 replicates of 100 trees for each of the 3 treatments = 1,500 trees All treatments received identical horticultural caretaking i.e. sprays, fertilization, irrigation, etc. Insecticidal sprays and neonic soil drenches were made according to IFAS recommendations

Rep. # 1 Rep. # 2 Rep. # 3 Rep. # 3 Rep. # 3 Rep 4 Windbreak Rep. # 4 Rep. # 5 Layout 15 plots divided into 3 treatments Tree # 8 E 8 W Tree # 9 E 9 W Tree # 10 E 10 W Tree # 11 E 11 W Tree # 12 E 12 W Tree # 13 E 13 W Tree # 14 E 14 W Tree # 15 E 15 W Tree # 101 101 101 101 101 101 Corymbia 101 101 101 torelliana 100 1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 1 99 99 99 99 99 1 99 99 99 98 1 98 98 98 98 98 1 98 98 98 97 1 97 97 97 97 1 97 97 97 97 96 1 96 96 96 96 1 96 1 96 96 96 95 1 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 94 1 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 93 1 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 91 91 91 1 91 91 91 91 91 91 90 1 90 90 90 90 90 1 90 90 90 89 1 89 89 89 1 89 89 89 89 89 88 1 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 87 1 87 87 87 87 1 87 1 87 87 87 86 86 86 86 86 86 1 86 86 86 85 85 85 85 85 85 1 85 85 1 1 85 84 84 84 84 84 84 1 84 84 84 83 83 83 83 83 83 1 83 83 83 82 1 82 82 82 82 82 1 82 82 82 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 80 80 80 80 80 1 80 80 80 80 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 78 1 1 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 77 1 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 75 1 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 74 1 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 73 1 1 73 73 73 73 73 1 73 73 73 72 72 72 72 72 72 1 72 72 72 71 71 71 71 71 71 1 71 71 71 70 1 70 70 70 1 70 70 1 70 70 70 69 1 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 68 68 68 1 68 68 68 68 68 68 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 66 66 1 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 1 65 65 65 65 65 1 65 65 65 64 64 64 64 64 64 1 64 64 64 63 63 63 1 63 63 63 1 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 62 62 1 62 62 62 61 61 61 61 61 61 1 61 61 61 60 1 60 60 60 60 60 1 60 60 60 59 59 59 59 59 59 1 59 59 59 58 58 58 58 58 58 1 58 58 58 57 57 57 57 57 57 1 57 57 57 56 1 56 56 56 56 56 1 56 56 56 55 55 55 55 55 55 1 55 55 55 54 54 54 54 54 54 1 54 54 54 53 1 53 1 53 53 53 53 1 53 53 53 52 21 5 52 1 1 52 2 1 52 1 1 52 3 1 52 1 52 52 1 1 52 51 51 51 51 51 51 1 51 51 51 50 50 50 50 50 50 1 50 50 50 49 49 49 49 49 49 1 49 49 49 48 1 48 48 48 48 48 1 48 48 48 47 47 47 47 47 47 1 47 47 47 46 1 46 46 46 46 46 1 46 46 46 45 45 45 45 45 45 1 45 45 45 44 1 44 44 44 44 44 1 44 44 44 43 1 43 43 43 43 43 1 43 1 43 43 42 1 42 42 42 42 42 1 42 42 42 Bare Ground 5 Reps Compost (UPD) Metallized Reflective Mulch (MRM) Treatments: RCB Design 41 41 41 41 41 41 1 41 41 41 40 40 40 40 40 40 1 40 1 40 40 39 39 39 39 39 39 1 39 39 39 38 38 38 38 1 38 38 1 38 38 38 37 37 37 37 37 37 1 37 37 37 36 36 36 36 36 36 1 36 36 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 1 35 35 35 34 34 34 34 34 34 1 34 34 34 33 33 33 33 33 33 1 33 33 33 32 32 32 32 32 32 1 32 32 32 31 31 31 31 31 31 1 31 31 31 30 30 30 30 30 30 1 30 30 30 29 29 29 29 29 29 1 29 29 29 28 28 28 28 1 28 28 1 28 28 28 27 27 1 27 27 27 27 1 27 27 27 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 24 24 1 24 24 24 24 24 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 1 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 1 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 1 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 1 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 1 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 9 9 8 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 8 8 7 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 56 1 5 2 1 1 1 Tree # 8 E 8 W Tree # 9 E 9 W Tree # 10 E 10 W Tree # 11 E 11 W Tree # 12 E 12 W Tree # 13 E 13 W Tree # 14 E 14 W Tree # 15 E 15 W Tree # Rep. # 1 Rep. # 1 Rep. # 2 Rep. # 2 Rep. # 4 Rep 4 Rep. # 5 Rep. # 5

10.4 Acre Study Site

Ground preparation was typical except for burning due to excess and problematic plant debris (wiregrass)

Extra tillage required due to installation of the MRM

Roller was use to firm up soil prior to laying the MRM

MRM * Installation Kennco Bedding Machine Ruskin, Fla. *Shine N Ripe XL is a product of Imaflex Inc., CANADA

MRM Installation

Planting Details P. D. 3-17-14

Irrigation Each tree was equipped with two Bowsmith 2GPH Drippers Part no. SB20

Water Saturation for prolonged periods 1. Phytophthora 2. Soil drench application problems

Weed Issues Nutsedge Fire Ants can be a problem but was remedied with Extinguish Plus

110 days post planting 07/05/2014 212 days post planting 10/15/2014 452 days post planting 06/12/2015 604 days post planting 11/11/2015

Increase in Trunk Caliper from 5/8/14 to 10/7/14 (150 days) 45 Caliper Diameter in mm ± S.E. 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 30.2 % > Bare Ground 50.2 % > Bare Ground 5 0 Bare Ground Compost MRM Treatment

Growth Increase by Canopy Volume Canopy Volume (m2) 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 1.63 Oct. 2015 July. 2016 3.71 3.37 (19 months) (28 months) 6.37 4.99 8.78 0.00 Bare Ground Compost MRM Treatment

Differences in growth rates were dramatic 2 years 6.4 months old 9/30/2016

Weekly Number of Asian Citrus Psyllids Observed per Tree for Each of the Three Treatments From 7/27/15 to 1/16/17

Fruit Size & Yield were Determined with IRREC s Portable Optical Fruit Sizing Machine and the able handling and management of Jerry Britt. Data collected from each tree (80/treatment) included the total number of fruit and the weight and diameter of each individual fruit harvested. The diameter data were used to develop a fruit size distribution curve for each tree which then was used to calculate yield as boxes/tree. Fruit diameters were converted to State standard sizes for grapefruit. (Data: courtesy Dr. Brian Boman)

Representative tree crop for each treatment prior to harvesting 12/14/16 Bare Ground 0.62 Boxes/Tree Compost 0.83 Boxes/Tree MRM 1.18 Boxes/Tree

Yield in Boxes/Tree for the Treatment Three Treatments Boxes/Tree ±S.E. No. of observations per treatment = 80 single trees % Increase in Yield over Bare Ground Bare Ground 0.62 ±0.04 a Compost 0.83 ±0.09 b 34% MRM 1.18 ±0.13 c 90% Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different (P < 0.05) based on SAS GLM Procedure.

1.4 Yield in Boxes/Tree for 3 Treatments 1.2 Boxes/Tree ±S.E. 1 0.8 0.6 34% > Bare Ground 90% > Bare Ground 0.4 0.2 0 Bare Ground Compost MRM No. of observations per treatment = 80

No. of Fruit/Tree & Fruit Size Treatment Avg. No. of Fruit/tree >64 % Increase in No. of Fruit/Tree over Bare Ground Bare Ground 46.1 a Compost 62.8 b 36% MRM 78.1 c 69% Treatment Avg. Fruit Dia./Tree (mm) % Increase in Fruit Size over Bare Ground Bare Ground 102.5 a Compost 104.4 b 2% MRM 110.2 b 8%

Fruit Size Frequency Measurements on 12/14/16 Note low no. of small fruit

Fruit Quality on 10/17/16

Average fruit juice quality and fruit weight of 20 fruit from 3 treatments: Bare Ground, Compost and Metalized Reflective Mulch (MRM) Avg. Fruit Juice vol. per Juice wt. per Treatment Brix Acid (%) Weight (g) fruit (cc) fruit (g) Bare Ground 403.0 a 212.0 a 205.4 a 8.54 1.10 7.79 a 51.0% ab 3.69 a Compost 393.1 a 202.9 a 196.0 a 8.09 1.12 7.22 b 49.8% a 3.43 b MRM 420.1 b 224.8 b 218.3 b 8.09 1.09 7.43 ab 52.0% b 3.57 ab P Values* 0.0015 0.0002 0.0002 0.0837 0.4230 TSS/TA Ratio Juice content (w/w) Poundssolids* 0.0300 0.0244 0.0448 *Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different (P = 0.05) based on Duncan's multiple range test SAS. *Pounds solids calculated using the % juice content and assuming 85lb grapefruit per box. Data: Courtesy of Dr. Mark Ritenhour and Dr. Cuifeng Hu, IRCREC

Average fruit color of 10 fruit for each treatment Treatment a/b Hue Chroma Bare Groumd 0.11 83.86 46.82 a Compost 0.11 83.64 46.49 a MRM 0.15 81.56 46.01 a P Values* 0.101 0.0934 0.3956 Data: Courtesy of Dr. Mark Ritenhour and Dr. Cuifeng Hu, IRCREC

Bare Ground Costs Land Preparation for Bare Ground Grove Practice Equipment Cost/Acre Materials Cost/Acre Mow $ 13.17 Herbicide $ 16.50 $ 27.69 12' Disk $ 13.17 Tilage with Rotovator $ 41.60 Install poly tubing & emitters $ 125.71 $ 392.59 Tree planting @ $1.40 ea. $ 203.00 $ 413.15 $ 420.28 Total Cost per acre $ 833.43 MRM Installation Costs Land Preparation and MRM Istallation Grove Practice Equipment Cost/Acre Materials Cost/Acre Mow $ 13.17 1st Herbicide $ 16.50 $ 27.69 Burn $ 42.00 1st Disk 12' $ 13.17 2nd Herbicide $ 16.50 $ 27.69 2nd Disk 12' $ 13.17 Tilage with Rotovator $ 41.60 Roll flat with roller $ 12.00 MRM Installation* $ 60.00 Shine N' Ripe XL $ 457.62 Install poly tubing & emitters $ 125.71 $ 392.59 Tree planting @ $1.40 ea. $ 203.00 Additional planting cost @ $0.80 e $ 116.00 $ 672.82 $ 905.59 Total Cost per acre $ 1,578.41 Additional Cost for MRM $ 744.98 Compost Application Costs Land Preparation and Compost Application Grove Practice Equipment Cost/Acre Materials Cost/Acre Mow $ 13.17 Herbicide $ 16.50 $ 27.69 12' Disk $ 13.17 Tilage with Rotovator $ 41.60 Apply Compost (3.75 tons/acre) $ 37.50 $ 75.02 Install poly tubing & emitters $ 125.71 $ 392.59 Tree planting @ $1.40 ea. $ 203.00 $ 450.65 $ 495.30 Total Cost per acre $ 945.95 Additional Cost for Compost $ 112.52 Amortized Costs of MRM Cost per year with 3 yr. life span $ 248.33 Cost per year with 5 yr. life span $ 149.00 Based on 145 trees/acre 12 x 25 planting density

Cost of Production, Revenue and Return Treatment Price/Field Box Back to the Tree (56% Packout) Boxes/ Tree Boxes/Acre @ 145 trees/acre Revenue Per Acre Production Cost/Acre Net Return Per Acre Application or Installation Costs Net Return/Acre Minus Installation Costs Bare Ground $ 12.78 0.62 90 $ 1,149 $ 1,858 $ (709) N/A $ (709) Compost $ 12.78 0.83 120 $ 1,538 $ 1,858 $ (320) $ 112.52 * $ (433) MRM $ 12.78 1.18 171 $ 2,187 $ 1,858 $ 328 $ 248.33 $ 80 * Compost applied Annually MRM Installation Amortized 3 Years

Acknowledgements IMAFLEX INC. Richard Chandler Planting & Irrigation Arapaho Citrus Management