Per Revised Concept Plan Residential Condo/Townhouse. Proposed Land Use per TIS

Similar documents
Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Traffic Feasibility Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation


IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

Project Advisory Committee

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

Re: 233 Armstrong Street Residential Condominium Traffic Brief

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

December 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

One Harbor Point Residential

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

Table 1: Existing Trip Generation A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Intensity Daily Total In Out Total In Out

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Mineola Village Green

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

4/2/18 MP NORTHPOINT MALL GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

GLEBE 672 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1

November 7, Mr. Francis J. Hanney District Traffic Services Manager PennDOT District Geerdes Boulevard King of Prussia, PA 19406

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

Traffic Impact Assessment

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Creditview Road Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Traffic Operations Analysis Final Report

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee

Access Management Standards

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Shoppes at Pine Meadow BPUD DeBary, Florida. Traffic Impact Analysis

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

144&176 John St. and 200 John St. & 588 Charlotte St. Hotel and Residential Subdivision Development

Volume 2 Appendix Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. June 18, 2018

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma.

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

Traffic Engineering Study

Design and Application of Mini- Roundabout in the U.S.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. for MILTON SQUARE

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Transcription:

January 2, 2018 Mr. Paul DeBotton Marple Associates, L.P. 1604 Walnut Street, 4 th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 RE: Langford Run Road Traffic Analysis Proposed Mid County Shopping Center Marple Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania Dear Mr. DeBotton: Century Engineering has conducted a traffic analysis for Langford Run Road which is located in the proposed Mid County Shopping Center in Marple Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania. The proposed land use and lane assignments used in the analysis was obtained from a site plan, prepared by Landcore Engineering Consultants (dated November 20, 2017). Century was tasked with developing proposed trip generation volumes to be generated by Lot 1 of the development and redistribute the site generated traffic to/from West Chester Pike and Lawrence Roads. The overall projected trip distribution used in the analysis was obtained from the Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Orth Rodgers & Associates, Inc. (last revised January 6, 2014). Trip Generation The proposed land use has changed since the TIS was submitted and approved. The TIS projected a mixed use development including residential condominiums, general office, a day care center, and 260,000 sf of retail. However, the revised concept plan indicates the site has changed considerably, with no residential units and substantially less retail than previously anticipated. A comparison of the land uses is shown below: Land Use Proposed Land Use per TIS Per Revised Concept Plan Residential Condo/Townhouse LU 230 147 du n/a Hotel LU 310 150 rooms n/a Health Fitness Ctr LU 492 16,000 sf 34,088 sf Day Care LU 565 4,000 sf n/a General Office LU 710 40,000 sf n/a Retail LU 820 260,000 sf 92,037 sf* Drive in Bank LU 912 4,000 sf n/a Supermarket LU 850 n/a 74,544 sf It should be noted that the revised concept plan references 80,000 sf of proposed retail/office space, two future pad sites totaling 9,700 sf, and an existing residence to be converted to commercial use. Since there is uncertainty regarding how much office space and what the future pad sites and commercial use will be, this analysis calculated the projected site generated traffic as all retail to be conservative. In general, the revised land use does not generate as much projected peak hour traffic volumes as the proposed land use per the TIS. 222 Valley Creek Boulevard, Suite 140 Exton, Pennsylvania 19341 610.407.9700 Hunt Valley, MD Oakland, MD Dover, DE Newark, DE New Cumberland, PA Fairfax, VA

Page 2 of 10 January 2, 2018 Mid County Traffic Review A comparison of the peak hour trip generation is shown below: Projected AM Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Volumes Per TIS Per Concept Plan Difference In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Total 355 254 609 273 176 449 (82) (78) (160) Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass By 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New 355 254 609 273 176 449 (82) (78) (160) Projected PM Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Volumes Per TIS Per Concept Plan Difference In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Total 822 889 1711 660 654 1314 (162) (235) (397) Internal 50 39 89 0 0 0 (50) (39) (89) Pass By 175 195 370 224 229 453 49 34 83 New 597 565 1253 436 425 861 (161) (140) (392) Projected Saturday Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Volumes Per TIS Per Concept Plan Difference In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Total 1020 936 1955 863 823 1686 (157) (113) (269) Internal 34 36 70 0 0 0 (34) (36) (70) Pass By 243 220 463 159 147 306 (84) (73) (157) New 743 681 1423 704 676 1380 (39) (5) (43) Utilizing the most conservative approach by estimating all retail land use, with the exception of the proposed supermarket and fitness center, the projected peak hour traffic volumes for Lot 1 are less than previously submitted with the previously approved Traffic Impact Study. Due to the Saturday peak hour generating the highest number of projected trips, this analysis will utilize the Saturday peak hour as the most critical peak. Trip Distribution The proposed site currently provides access to both West Chester Pike to the north and Lawrence Road to the south. To distribute the projected site generated traffic volumes to the existing roadway network, this analysis utilized previously approved trip distribution from the TIS. The majority of the traffic will be entering/exiting to the north via West Chester Pike, with the minority of traffic entering/exiting to the south via Lawrence Road (). Similarly for pass by trips, the previously approved trip distribution from the approved TIS was utilized for the revised land use analysis and comparison.

Page 3 of 10 January 2, 2018 Mid County Traffic Review The revised site plan provides two site access driveways; a right in/right out driveway to the north, and a full access driveway to the south. All 84% of the exiting site traffic heading towards West Chester Pike will need utilize the full access driveway to the south. The proposed site generated traffic volumes were then distributed to the proposed development and the internal site access driveways along Langford Run Road based on the type of land use. The proposed trip distribution and peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figures 1 through 5.

FIGURE 1 Proposed Trip Distribution (New ) Mid-County Traffic Memorandum MARPLE TOWNSHIP, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA GIANT (11%) 24% (5%) (5%) 60% 24% 84% RETAIL () 84% 84% 84% LA FITNESS () 60% 24% 60% 84%

FIGURE 2 Proposed Trip Distribution (PassBy ) Mid-County Traffic Memorandum MARPLE TOWNSHIP, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA GIANT (10%) (90%) 20% 20% (90%) 60% 20% RETAIL (10%) (90%) 20% 80% (90%) 80% LA FITNESS

FIGURE 3 Peak Hour Site Traffic Volumes (New ) Mid-County Traffic Memorandum MARPLE TOWNSHIP, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA AM PEAK 273 Enter (176) Exit 449 New 23 148 44 129 5 148 5 100 129 PM PEAK 436 Enter (425) Exit 861 New 58 357 70 227 10 357 10 139 227 SATURDAY PEAK 704 Enter (676) Exit 1380 New 89 568 113 347 19 568 19 244 347

FIGURE 4 Peak Hour Site Traffic Volumes (Passby ) Mid-County Traffic Memorandum MARPLE TOWNSHIP, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA AM PEAK 0 Enter 0 Exit 0 Passby PM PEAK 224 Enter 229 Exit 453 Passby 23 206 45 110 206 69 110 SATURDAY PEAK 159 Enter 147 Exit 306 Passby 15 132 32 127 132 0 127

FIGURE 5 Peak Hour Site Traffic Volumes (Total ) Mid-County Traffic Memorandum MARPLE TOWNSHIP, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA AM PEAK 273 Enter 176 Exit 449 Total 23 148 44 129 5 148 5 100 129 PM PEAK 660 Enter 654 Exit 1314 Total 81 563 115 337 10 563 10 208 337 SATURDAY PEAK 863 Enter 823 Exit 1686 Total 104 700 145 474 19 700 19 244 474

Page 9 of 10 January 2, 2018 Mid County Traffic Review LOS/Queue Analysis Based on the current Signing & Striping Plan provided by Landcore Engineering and the projected peak hour traffic volumes, we analyzed the projected peak hour levels of service and queuing for the internal site access driveways. The proposed site plan indicates there are two site access driveways; a right in/right out driveway to the north and a full access driveway to the south. Since the Saturday peak hour provides the highest peak hour traffic volumes, this analysis will focus on the Saturday peak hour. As currently proposed per the revised concept plan, the full access driveway is stop controlled with free flow traffic along Langford Run Road. Langford Run Road provides a separate northbound left turn lane entering the site, as well as a separate left and right turn lanes exiting the site. As currently proposed, there would be extensive queues for site traffic exiting the site turning left to head north towards West Chester Pike during the Saturday peak hour. With the installation of a Langford Run Road southbound right turn lane entering the site, the exiting queues will decrease but still be over 30 vehicles. The following table indicates the projected LOS and queuing at the full access driveway under several alternatives: Project Levels of Service Alternative Comparison Alternative Langford Roadway Movement Per Concept All Way WB RT Plan Stop* lane Signalized Roundabout* Langford Run NB L A A C B NB T B Langford Run SB T A A B SB R E B Site Access EB L F F F A B EB R B A B A A Overall F F E B B * All Way Stop and Roundabout alternatives includes a Langford Run SB right turn for vehicles entering the site Project Queuing Alternative Comparison (per vehicle) Alternative Roadway Movement Per Concept Langford All Way Plan SB RT lane Stop* Signalized Roundabout* Langford Run NB L 0.5 0.3 1.6 3.0 NB T 1.0 Langford Run SB T 0.1 0.0 0.3 SB R 10.3 3.0 Site Access EB L 51.2 30.3 13.6 11.7 6.0 EB R 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 * All Way Stop and Roundabout alternatives includes a Langford Run SB right turn for vehicles entering the site Based on the tables shown above, only the signalized and roundabout alternatives will provide sufficient levels of service. Under the signalized alternative, the exiting queue for the left turn lane would be approximately 300 (or 12 vehicles), with the queue under the roundabout alternative to be approximately half of that (150 or 6 vehicles). Under the all way stop alternative, the exiting left turn lane queue is approximately 50 (2 vehicles) more than that of the signalized alternative with a total queue length of approximately 350 (14 vehicles).

Page 10 of 10 January 2, 2018 Mid County Traffic Review Turn Lane Warrant and Storage Length per PennDOT PennDOT s Traffic Engineering Manual (Publication 46) provides guidance for turn lane warrants and recommended storage length. The turn lane guidelines provided taken into consideration the amount of volume at the intersection, the proposed speed limit, type of signal control, type of terrain, and intersection control to provide guidance on whether a separate turn lane is needed and the length the lane should be to satisfy the projected queues. Per PennDOT Publication 46, the separate turn lanes for all turning movements along Langford Run Road are warranted with the recommended storage lengths indicated below: Conclusion Turn Lane Warrant and Storage Length Recommended per PennDOT Publication 46 Roadway Movement Warrant Recommended Met Storage Length Langford Run @ Full Access NB L Y 100 SB R Y 325 Full Access @ Langford Run EB L Y 450 EB R Y 100 Langford Run @ SB R Y 175 This analysis reviewed the projected site generated peak hour traffic volumes based on the revised concept plan provided by Landcore Engineering Consultants, Inc. The projected volumes were then distributed to the surrounding roadway network utilizing the previously approved trip distribution from the Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Orth Rodgers & Associates (dated January 6, 2014). The analysis was completed to determine the peak hour LOS and queueing at the internal site driveways located along Langford Run Road. The analysis shows that based on the lane configuration as shown on the concept plan, the left turn exit at the full access site driveway would experience an approximate 1280 queue. Modifying the traffic control at the intersection to provide an all way stop would reduce the queue to 340. Signalizing the intersection or installing a roundabout would reduce the queues even further. According to PennDOT Publication 46, all turning movements to/from the internal site driveways should provide a separate turn lane, including the right in at the limited access driveway to the north. Truly yours, CENTURY ENGINEERING, INC. Richard T. Rezer Senior Transportation Planner rrezer@centuryeng.com