Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation.

Similar documents
To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger. Objective

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

2003 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT PERMISSION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT PERMISSION

Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to Indiana growing conditions.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

CONTENTS National Tall Fescue Test data LOCATIONS SUBMITTING DATA FOR

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2008 Turfgrass Proceedings

2009 Turfgrass Proceedings

Performance Testing of Tall Fescue Turfgrasses at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

1995 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2011 Turfgrass Proceedings

20 Turfgrass Proceedings

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2011 Turfgrass Proceedings

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2013 Turfgrass Proceedings

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Kentucky bluegrass Varietal Trial National Turfgrass Evaluation Program - Final Report 2000 C.E. Miluch

Turfgrass Association of Australia (ACT Incorporated) Perennial Rye, Seeded Couch and Tall Fescue evaluation Trials

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program Tests. University of California, Riverside. Priti Saxena and Jim Baird

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007)

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Table 1. Bowie ground cover from various herbicides applied at seeding, 0WAE, or 2 WAE Description bowie bowie bowie. % % Number of Subsamples 1 1 1

National Routing Number Administration p-ani Activity and Projected Exhaust Report

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Roundup Ready Trial Page 12

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

2007 Turfgrass Proceedings

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

The Economic Downturn Lessons on the Correlation between Economic Growth and Energy

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

August 2018 MLS Statistical Report

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

MEDIA PACK 2019 MAGAZINE WINDOWS DOORS CONSERVATORIES GLASS FABRICATORS DISTRIBUTORS INSTALLERS. October 2018 Issue

2015 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Triticale and Rye Forage

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

JOB LOSSES BY STATE, State Industry US total AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT Agriculture, forestry, fisheries -15, ,

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC Apple Rootstock Trials. November, Davis, CA. John A. Cline

Tennessee Gas Pipeline. Enfield Customer Meeting October 19, 2016

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Arkansas Soybean. Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION December 2015 Research Series 630

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Smooth Crabgrass Control in 'KY 31' Tall Fescue with Pendulum Formulations

increase of over four per cent compared to the average of $409,058 reported in January 2010.

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

2005 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands

US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20 <Westbound and Southbound>

Preston s Edmond Market Report

Trial report. Variety testing of. Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea. Second year harvest

Western Canadian Grass Seed Testing Program

Variety testing of Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea

Advanced Yield and Preliminary Spring Wheat Variety Performance Trials

Greenbush School Maintenance Calendar

Sunflower Hybrids. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1024

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

CEO PROGRAM September 2018

1997 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

Transcription:

2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2005 Results Glenn Hardebeck and Cale Bigelow Objective Rationale To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions in central Indiana. Turf-type tall fescue has many attributes such as very good drought tolerance, very good heat tolerance, moderate cold tolerance, and good wear tolerance that make it a good choice for many turf sites. Tall fescue will form a dense, attractive turf stand when properly maintained. By determining the performance of the 160 varieties, we will be able to offer sound information on which varieties of turf-type tall fescue to plant in Indiana. How It Was Done One hundred and sixty varieties of turf-type tall fescue were seeded on 5 Sep 2001 at the William H. Daniel Research and Diagnostic Center on a silt loam soil. Seeding rate was 5.2 lbs per 1000 ft 2 and seed was spread using a hand shaker jar. After seeding the experiment was lightly raked and a starter fertilizer (8-22-16) was applied at the rate of 1.5 lbs P 2 O 5 per 1000 ft 2. The area was covered with a germination blanket following seeding to prevent washing of seed and mixing of varieties. Plots are maintained under a high maintenance regime, typical of a home lawn. The mowing height is 2 inches, mowed twice per week. The annual fertilization is 3.5 lbs. N per 1000 ft 2 with 1 lb applied in mid-may, 1 lb in mid-september, and 1.5 lbs. in early November. Irrigation is applied to prevent any sign of stress. Data collected during 2005 included genetic color, green-up and visual quality ratings from April to Oct. All data taken were visual observations of turf characteristics and performance. Visual quality ratings were taken using a scale of 1 to 9 with 1 = no living turf, 5 = acceptable turf, and 9 = ideal turf. Results to Date There are no statistical differences in average visual quality among the top 53 cultivars (Table 1). When making cultivar selections, it is best to consult the NTEP web page at www.ntep.org for complete performance data from around the country on cultivars, placing special emphasis on how cultivars perform in IN, IL, KY, MI and/or OH (depending if you are located in northern, central, or southern IN) under the specific maintenance regime you intend for that grass. Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation.

Table 1. Visual quality, genetic color and greenup of 160 turf-type tall fescue cultivars growing under high maintenance in 2005. Cultivar Visual quality a Genetic Spring Apr a May June July Aug Sep Oct Avg color b greenup c GO-OD2 6.7 6.3 6.7 7.0 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.1 8.3 7.0 PST-DDL 7.7 6.3 5.7 6.7 6.7 7.3 8.3 7.0 8.0 7.3 SR 8250 7.3 6.7 6.3 5.7 7.0 7.7 8.0 7.0 8.0 6.7 Watchdog 7.7 6.0 6.0 6.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.9 8.0 7.3 Riverside (ProSeeds 5301) 7.3 5.7 6.7 6.7 7.3 7.3 7.3 6.9 8.0 7.7 Millennium 7.3 5.7 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.0 8.0 6.9 8.0 7.3 Tar Heel 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 7.7 6.9 7.7 7.3 SR 8600 6.7 6.3 5.7 6.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.9 8.0 7.0 SRX 805 7.0 7.0 5.7 6.0 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.9 7.7 7.3 PST-5KI 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.7 6.8 8.0 7.0 JT-18 7.0 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.3 7.3 7.3 6.8 8.0 8.0 Signia 6.7 6.0 6.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 7.7 6.8 8.0 6.7 Inferno (JT-99) 7.0 6.7 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.7 6.8 8.0 6.7 01-RUTOR2 7.0 6.7 5.3 6.0 7.0 7.3 8.0 6.8 8.0 8.0 MRF 27 7.0 6.0 5.7 6.0 7.3 7.7 7.7 6.8 8.0 6.7 MRF 211 7.0 5.7 5.0 6.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 6.8 8.0 6.7 Falcon IV (F-4) 7.3 6.0 6.0 5.7 6.7 7.3 8.0 6.7 8.0 7.0 K01-8015 7.0 7.0 4.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 8.0 6.7 8.0 6.7 ATF-800 7.0 5.7 5.3 6.7 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.7 7.3 7.7 Avenger (L1Z) 7.0 6.3 6.3 5.0 7.0 7.7 7.7 6.7 8.0 6.7 Titanium (SBM) 7.3 6.0 6.0 5.7 7.3 7.0 7.7 6.7 8.0 7.7 Pick-00-AFA 7.0 6.3 5.7 5.7 7.0 7.3 8.0 6.7 8.0 6.3 PST-5T1 7.3 5.3 5.7 6.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.7 8.0 7.0 PST-53T 6.7 6.0 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.3 7.7 6.7 8.0 7.7 K01-WAF 7.3 6.3 5.3 5.7 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.7 8.0 7.0 NA-TDD 7.0 7.0 5.3 5.7 7.0 7.0 7.7 6.7 8.0 6.0 T991 7.0 6.3 5.7 5.7 7.0 7.3 7.7 6.7 7.7 6.7 CIS-TF-77 7.0 6.3 6.0 5.7 6.7 7.0 8.0 6.7 8.0 6.7 PST-5NAS 7.0 6.0 4.7 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 6.7 8.0 6.7 PST-5LO 7.3 5.7 6.3 6.0 6.7 7.0 7.7 6.7 8.0 7.0 Matador 7.0 5.7 5.3 6.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.7 8.0 7.3 JT-9 7.0 6.3 5.0 6.0 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.7 8.0 8.0 Barrington 6.7 6.7 5.7 6.7 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.6 7.7 7.0 Jaguar 3 7.0 5.3 5.3 5.7 7.3 7.3 8.3 6.6 8.0 7.0 MA 127 6.3 6.7 5.0 5.7 7.3 7.7 7.7 6.6 8.0 7.3 Picasso 7.0 6.0 6.3 6.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 6.6 8.0 6.7

Masterpiece 6.7 5.7 6.3 6.3 6.7 7.0 7.7 6.6 8.0 6.7 UT-RB3 7.0 6.0 5.7 6.0 7.3 7.0 7.3 6.6 8.0 7.3 Scorpion 6.7 6.0 5.7 6.0 7.0 7.3 7.7 6.6 8.3 7.0 CIS-TF-60 7.0 6.0 5.7 6.3 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.6 8.0 7.0 Finesse II 7.0 6.3 6.3 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.6 8.0 7.3 Dominion 7.0 6.0 6.0 5.7 6.7 7.3 7.3 6.6 8.0 6.3 2nd Millennium 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.7 6.6 8.0 7.0 Magellan (OD-4) 7.0 7.3 5.3 5.0 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.6 8.0 7.3 Cayenne 7.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.7 7.3 8.0 6.6 8.0 7.0 PST-5A1 7.0 6.0 6.0 5.7 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.6 8.0 7.0 Wolfpack 7.0 6.3 6.0 6.7 6.0 6.7 7.3 6.6 7.7 8.0 JT-6 7.0 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.7 7.7 6.6 8.0 7.0 SR 8550 (SRX 8BE4) 7.0 5.7 5.7 5.3 7.0 7.7 7.7 6.6 8.0 6.0 Rembrandt 6.7 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 6.6 8.0 7.3 Falcon II 6.3 6.0 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.6 7.7 7.3 K01-8007 6.7 5.3 5.3 6.7 6.7 7.3 8.0 6.6 8.0 6.7 Plantation 7.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 7.3 7.7 7.0 6.6 8.0 6.7 Blackwatch (Pick-OD3-01) 6.3 5.7 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.3 7.7 6.5 8.0 6.7 ATF 806 7.3 6.0 5.0 6.7 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.3 Pick ZMG 7.3 5.3 4.7 6.0 7.0 7.7 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.0 B-7001 6.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.5 8.0 7.7 Constitution (ATF-593) 7.0 6.3 5.3 5.3 6.7 7.3 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.3 BAR Fa 1005 7.0 5.3 5.7 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.3 Guardian-21 (Roberts DOL) 7.0 5.0 6.0 5.7 6.7 7.3 8.0 6.5 8.0 7.7 PST-5JM 6.7 5.7 5.7 5.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.5 8.0 6.0 Silverstar (PST-5ASR) 7.0 5.3 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.5 8.0 7.7 01-ORU1 6.3 6.3 5.0 6.3 6.7 7.3 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.0 GO-RD4 6.3 6.0 6.3 6.0 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.5 7.7 6.7 Rebel Exeda 6.7 6.0 5.7 6.3 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.5 8.0 6.3 Rebel Sentry 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.0 6.5 8.0 7.0 Finelawn Elite (DLSD) 7.0 5.0 5.7 5.7 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.5 8.0 6.7 BAR Fa 1003 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 7.3 8.0 6.5 8.0 6.7 Tar Heel II (PST-5TR1) 7.0 6.0 5.3 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.7 Quest 7.3 5.7 5.0 6.7 6.7 6.7 7.3 6.5 7.7 7.3 Tahoe (CAS-157) 6.7 6.3 5.7 6.0 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.5 8.0 6.3 Cochise III (018) 7.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 7.3 7.0 7.7 6.5 7.7 7.0 TF66 6.7 6.3 5.3 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.7 6.5 8.3 7.0 Raptor (CIS-TF-33) 6.0 5.7 5.3 6.0 7.3 7.3 7.7 6.5 8.0 7.0 Gremlin (P-58) 7.0 5.0 5.7 6.7 6.3 7.0 7.7 6.5 8.0 6.7

PST-5KU 7.3 5.3 4.7 6.3 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.5 8.0 7.0 MRF 29 6.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.5 8.0 6.7 Tracer 5.7 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 6.7 7.7 6.4 8.0 6.3 PST-57E 7.0 5.7 5.0 6.3 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.4 8.0 8.0 PST-5FZD 7.3 6.0 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.7 7.3 6.4 8.0 6.3 Tomahawk RT 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.0 6.4 8.3 8.0 JT-13 6.7 5.7 5.3 6.3 6.7 6.7 7.7 6.4 8.0 7.7 GO-FL3 6.3 5.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.4 7.3 7.0 MRF 28 6.7 5.3 5.7 6.0 6.3 7.3 7.7 6.4 8.0 7.0 Barlexas 6.3 6.7 5.7 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.4 8.0 6.3 Tulsa II (ATF-706) 6.3 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.3 7.0 7.7 6.4 8.0 6.7 ATF 702 6.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.4 8.0 7.0 ATF 799 6.7 6.0 4.7 6.7 6.3 7.0 7.3 6.4 8.0 6.0 CIS-TF-67 6.7 5.7 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.4 8.0 7.3 Siverado II (PST-578) 7.0 6.0 5.7 5.3 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.4 8.0 7.0 Pure Gold 6.3 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.3 6.4 8.0 7.0 01-TFOR3 6.7 6.3 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.3 7.7 6.4 8.0 7.0 Legitimate 6.7 5.3 6.0 6.0 6.3 7.0 7.3 6.4 7.7 7.0 Tempast 6.7 5.7 5.3 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.7 6.4 8.0 6.7 Justice (RB2-01) 7.7 5.7 5.3 5.7 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.3 8.0 7.3 R-4 7.0 5.7 5.3 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.7 6.3 8.0 6.3 ATF 586 6.7 6.7 5.0 5.3 6.7 6.7 7.3 6.3 8.0 6.3 Kitty Hawk 2000 7.0 5.7 4.7 5.7 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.3 8.0 7.0 Rendition 6.7 7.0 5.0 6.0 6.3 6.3 7.0 6.3 8.0 6.0 Laramie 7.0 5.3 4.7 5.3 7.0 7.3 7.7 6.3 7.7 7.3 Dynasty 6.7 6.0 5.7 7.0 5.7 6.3 7.0 6.3 8.0 7.0 PST-5TUO 6.7 7.0 4.7 6.0 6.3 6.3 7.3 6.3 8.0 7.3 DP 50-9226 7.0 5.7 4.7 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.7 6.3 7.7 7.7 Prospect 6.3 5.3 6.0 5.7 6.7 6.7 7.3 6.3 8.0 6.3 CIS-TF-65 7.0 5.3 5.3 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.3 8.0 7.0 JTTFF-2000 6.7 6.0 5.3 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 6.3 8.0 6.3 PST-5S12 5.3 5.7 5.7 5.7 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.3 8.0 7.0 Endeavor 7.0 5.7 5.7 5.3 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.3 8.0 7.3 JT-15 6.3 5.7 5.3 6.3 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.3 8.0 7.7 EA 163 6.3 6.3 5.7 5.0 6.3 7.0 7.3 6.3 8.0 6.3 Padre (NJ4) 6.7 6.0 4.7 5.0 7.3 7.0 7.3 6.3 7.7 7.3 BE1 6.7 6.3 4.7 6.0 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.3 8.0 7.0 Davinci (LPT-7801) 6.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.7 6.2 8.0 7.3 Forte (BE-2) 6.3 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.3 7.3 6.2 8.0 6.7

ATF 707 6.7 5.7 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.2 7.7 6.3 Bravo 6.3 6.7 5.0 5.3 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.2 8.0 6.7 Lancer 6.3 6.0 4.3 5.3 6.7 7.3 7.7 6.2 8.0 7.0 K01-E03 5.3 6.0 4.3 6.3 7.0 7.0 7.7 6.2 8.0 7.3 DLF-J210 6.7 6.0 4.7 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.0 6.2 8.0 6.7 MA 158 7.3 5.7 4.3 5.3 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.2 8.0 6.3 Turbo (CAS-MC1) 6.0 6.3 4.7 6.0 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.2 8.0 7.3 CAS-ED 6.3 6.7 5.0 5.7 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.2 8.0 7.7 Grande II 6.3 6.3 5.0 5.3 6.7 6.7 7.3 6.2 7.7 6.7 MRF 26 6.7 5.7 5.3 5.7 6.7 6.7 7.0 6.2 8.0 7.0 MRF 210 6.3 5.3 5.3 5.7 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.2 7.7 7.3 ATF-803 7.0 5.7 4.7 5.3 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.2 8.0 6.7 Pick TF H-97 6.3 6.0 5.0 5.3 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.2 7.7 6.3 South Paw (MRF 24) 6.0 5.7 5.3 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.3 6.2 8.0 7.3 PST-5BZ 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.7 7.7 6.2 8.0 6.0 Elisa 6.7 6.0 6.0 4.3 6.3 7.0 7.0 6.2 7.3 5.7 Barlexas II 6.3 5.3 5.3 6.3 6.3 6.7 7.0 6.2 7.7 7.3 Five Point (MCN-RC) 6.3 6.3 5.3 5.3 6.0 6.7 7.3 6.2 8.0 6.7 Olympic Gold 5.7 5.0 5.3 5.7 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.2 7.7 7.3 Coyote 6.3 6.0 4.7 6.0 6.7 6.7 7.0 6.2 7.3 7.3 BAR Fa 1CR7 6.3 6.3 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.2 7.7 7.0 MRF 25 6.3 5.7 5.0 6.0 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.2 8.0 7.0 ATF 704 7.3 6.0 4.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.1 8.0 6.3 CIS-TF-64 6.3 5.0 5.3 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.7 6.1 8.0 7.0 Guardian-21 (Roberts SM4) 6.7 5.0 5.3 5.3 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.1 7.7 7.3 MA 138 6.7 6.3 4.7 5.7 6.0 6.3 7.0 6.1 8.0 6.3 UT-155 6.7 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.7 7.3 6.1 8.0 6.7 Bonsai 6.7 5.3 4.3 5.3 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 Mustang 3 7.0 5.3 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.3 7.0 6.0 7.7 8.0 Bingo 6.7 5.3 4.3 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.3 6.0 8.0 7.3 Southern Choice II 6.3 5.3 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.3 7.0 6.0 8.0 6.7 Stetson 5.7 6.0 4.3 5.0 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 Wyatt 6.0 5.3 4.3 6.0 6.0 6.7 7.3 6.0 7.7 7.7 DP 50-9082 6.3 5.0 4.3 6.3 6.0 6.3 7.3 6.0 7.3 6.3 Barrera 6.0 5.7 4.7 5.7 5.7 6.3 7.7 6.0 8.0 6.0 Titan Ltd. 6.0 5.7 5.0 5.0 6.3 6.3 7.0 5.9 8.0 6.0 Biltmore 7.3 5.7 4.3 5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 5.9 8.0 6.3 Focus 6.3 5.3 4.7 5.0 6.0 6.7 7.0 5.9 8.0 6.3 PST-5BAB 6.0 6.0 4.7 5.3 6.0 6.0 6.7 5.8 7.3 6.3

GO-SIU2 6.0 4.3 6.0 4.7 5.7 6.7 7.3 5.8 8.0 7.0 Covenant (ATF 802) 6.7 5.3 4.3 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.3 5.7 7.3 6.7 K01-E09 7.0 4.3 4.3 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.7 5.7 6.7 7.0 JT-12 5.7 5.0 4.7 5.3 5.7 6.3 6.7 5.6 8.0 7.3 Daytona (MRF 23) 5.3 4.7 4.3 4.3 5.7 6.3 7.0 5.4 7.7 6.3 Ky-31 E+ 5.3 5.0 4.7 5.0 5.7 5.7 6.3 5.4 6.7 6.0 Kalahari 4.7 4.3 4.7 5.0 5.3 6.0 6.7 5.2 7.0 6.3 LSD(0 1.3 1.4 1.9 1.5 2.1 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 1.4 a Visual quality ratings were taken using a scale of 1 to 9 with 1 = no living turf, 5 = acceptable turf, and 9 = ideal turf. b Color was rated on a scale of 1 to 9 were 1 = light green and 9 = dark green. c Spring greenup was rated on a scale of 1 to 9 were 1 = dormant and 9 = dark green.