Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

Similar documents
Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Needs and Community Characteristics

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Transit Access Study

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Before the United States House of Representatives. Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Appendix C. Operating Assumptions (Service Plan) Tables and Figures. Travel time and Ridership Data - Tables

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

What is the Connector?

Economic Viability and Environmental Sustainability Dimensions of Passenger Rail Service Integration for Commuter and Casino Traffic on the Gulf Coast

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Executive Summary October 2013

Future of FrontRunner Final Report

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

Energy Technical Memorandum

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Battery Bus Feasibility. Jan 29, 2018

MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and MTA Metro-North Railroad (MNR) System-wide Service Standards

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Halifax Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

METRO Light Rail Update

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Transit Access to the National Harbor

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Report by Planning, Development & Real Estate Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

The capital cost estimates do not include allowances for: ROW acquisition. Third-party mitigation works. Hazardous materials handling.

Transcription:

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service HNTB Corporation April 2018

Table of Contents 4.1 Overview... 4-1 4.2 Key Assumptions... 4-1 4.2.1 Trips to Boston and New York... 4-1 4.2.2 Trips to Lewiston/Auburn... 4-1 4.2.3 Transit Infrastructure... 4-2 4.2.4 Estimate of Increased Interstate Bus Ridership... 4-2 4.3 Capital and Operating Costs... 4-2 4.4 Findings... 4-2 4.4.1 Key Benefits... 4-3 4.4.2 Key Impacts... 4-3 ` DRAFT

4.1 Overview The primary interstate bus providers in the study area are Concord Coach Lines and Greyhound. Both Concord and Greyhound provide service to Boston and New York (to the south) and to Lewiston/Auburn (to the north). The Lewiston/Auburn bus service is identified in this alternative as an Interstate Bus because the bus providers operate interstate routes. In this alternative, the Concord and Greyhound bus systems will be evaluated to determine the potential effects of practicable system improvements including increased service and additional transit infrastructure on: Overall interstate transit ridership; and Change in vehicular demand on the Maine Turnpike in the Portland Area. 4.2 Key Assumptions This alternative involves evaluating existing interstate bus service and working with key staff to determine practicable improvements to service. Descriptions of the key assumptions and methods follow. 4.2.1 Trips to Boston and New York Concord Coach Lines currently provides 16 runs between Portland and Boston/New York City beginning between 2:45 AM and 4:30 AM and ending at 10:30 PM daily. Parking is available in Portland at the Transportation Center for $5/day, and tickets range from $40 round trip from Portland to Boston up to $150 round trip from Portland to New York City. Trip lengths are comparable with driving by car, and amenities include wi-fi, power outlets and luggage storage. Greyhound currently provides up to two round trips daily between Portland and Boston. Fares are comparable with Concord Coach Line fares. These buses originate north of Portland with stops in Bangor, Augusta, and Lewiston. Since Concord Coach Lines provides the majority of the interstate trips in the region, future interstate bus expansion was focused on this provider. Future plans would increase this total to 20 runs 1 between Portland and Boston/New York City, one of which would occur during peak vehicular demand periods. 4.2.2 Trips to Lewiston/Auburn Concord Coach Line currently provides six runs between Lewiston/Auburn and Portland each day, running between 5 AM and 11 PM each day. Free parking is available at the Exit 75 Transportation Center. The Concord service between Portland and Lewiston/Auburn is a new service, and existing ridership numbers were not provided by Concord Coach Lines. Therefore, the number of additional passengers traveling from Lewiston/Auburn to Portland was estimated based on information in the MaineDOT 2011 Intercity Feasibility Study 2. 1 Dana Knapp, meeting, 14 February 2018, Portland Transportation Center 2 Maine Department of Transportation, Portland to Lewiston/Auburn & Montreal Intercity Passenger Rail Feasibility Study (MaineDOT, August 2011) DRAFT 4-1

Greyhound provides limited service between Portland and Lewiston/Auburn (1 to 2 trips per day). Fares are comparable with Concord Coach Lines. 4.2.3 Transit Infrastructure It was assumed that interstate bus service would grow unconstrained and not be limited by infrastructure deficits such as inadequate parking or transit connections. One key constraint that was assumed to be addressed as part of this alternative was additional parking at the Portland Transportation Center. Parking is generally at capacity at the Portland Transportation Center. Parking will need to be sizably extended in the future to accommodate additional transit demand identified in this alternative, either through surface lot or parking structure. 4.2.4 Estimate of Increased Interstate Bus Ridership Potential increases in inter bus ridership were estimated using two methods estimating passengers from Concord Coach Line plans for increasing service, and estimating passengers from information in the 2011 Interstate Feasibility Study for ridership from the Lewiston/Auburn area to Portland and points south. Concord Coach Lines currently anticipates future plans to add one new bus trip during the peak periods. If the additional vehicle was a 54-person passenger bus (consistent with the current Concord buses), that would yield a maximum of 54 additional passengers on an interstate bus during the peak hour. It is estimated based on population data that 36 of these users, or 66%, could be removed from the Turnpike. The 2011 Intercity Feasibility Study estimated that approximately 46,000 trips per year could use transit to commute from the Lewiston/ Auburn area to Portland and points south. To convert these trips to peak hour ridership, it was assumed that the route would operate only on week days and that the peak hour represents 25% of the daily trips, or 46 passenger trips. Using American Commuting Survey data from the US Census 3, this results in an estimated four peak hour vehicles that would be removed from the Maine Turnpike between Exits 44 and 53. This is due to the vast majority of trips being destined to/from Portland Transportation Center, resulting in minimal trip reductions on the Maine Turnpike. 4.3 Capital and Operating Costs The capital costs to add an additional Portland to Boston peak period bus trip for two peak periods was estimated to be approximately $0.6 million in 2017 dollars. No additional capital cost was identified for Portland to Lewiston/Auburn as Concord Coach Lines did not indicate any plans for expansion. With these additional Portland to Boston bus trips, the additional operating and maintenance costs for this alternative would be $0.75 million per year. 4.4 Findings The estimated number of vehicles that could be reduced from the peak hour traffic on the Maine Turnpike in the Portland area with new and expanded interstate bus service is 40. With this reduction, the volume 3 https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/commuting/commuting-flows.html DRAFT 4-2

to capacity ratio would still be greater than one in 2040 (1.36). Therefore, this alternative does not address identified capacity issues on the Maine Turnpike. This alternative was evaluated against several Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) which are summarized in the Alternatives Evaluation Matrix, dated April 12, 2018. The key findings from that matrix for this alternative are as follows: 4.4.1 Key Benefits The key benefits of Alternative 4 Interstate Bus are the following: 0.1% reduction in regional vehicle miles traveled (-0.1%); Increases Portland area transit ridership by an estimated 100 trips; Reduces NOx (-0.1%) and HC (-0.1%), improving air quality; No legal or policy obstacles to implementation; Can be implemented in a short timeframe; and Has a Benefit/Cost ratio of 5.8. 4.4.2 Key Impacts The key impacts and challenges of Alternative 4 Interstate Bus are the following: Has potential wetland impacts; and Has a volume to capacity ratio (v/c) that is still greater than one (1.36) on the Maine Turnpike. DRAFT 4-3