Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

Similar documents
Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

Federal Way Link Extension

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

Sound Transit 2 Making Connections The Regional Transit System Plan for Central Puget Sound

A Better Transit Plan

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Needs and Community Characteristics

MOTION NO. M Identifying a Sound Transit 3 Candidate Project List for Development of a Sound Transit 3 System Plan and Directing Further Study

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

Transit Access to the National Harbor

Seattle & North King County. - I Bus Connections (CHOR~E. U_Oistnct7 \( The Regional Transit Authority ... 8RegiOna, Transit Authority ~...

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Capital Cost Estimation Methodology and Assumptions

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

Sound Transit 3. Appendix C: Benefits, Costs, Revenues, Capacity, Reliability, and Performance Characteristics

Summary. S.1 Lynnwood Link Extension

PROPOSAL OF HIGH CAPACITY URBANAUT PUGET SOUND REGIONAL MONORAIL MASTERPLAN WASHINGTON STATE, USA

3.0 Transportation Environment and Consequences

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

Business Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

29 April Sound Transit 3 Draft Plan. Dear Sound Transit Boardmember:

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Transit Maintenance Equipment. Maintenance Facilities FY

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Cost / Schedule Update

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-D May 13, 2010 Rail Fleet Plan

Level 2 Alternatives Screening Report

I-20 East Transit Initiative

TBARTA USF to Wesley Chapel Express Bus Service Operating Plan. Draft 3/25/2014

Durham-Orange County Corridor Alternatives Analysis JULY Prepared by: U R S Team

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

3.17 Energy Resources

5 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

City of Bellevue East Link Light Rail B7/C9T to NE 2nd Portal (B7 Revised) Alternative RP03 Interim Analysis Report

3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project

DART Priorities Overview

EAST LINK PROJECT. Environmental Scoping Information Report. Seattle to Bellevue to Redmond. September 2006

A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #10

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Design Endorsement for Sterling Boulevard Extension

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

3.0 Transportation Environment and Consequences

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2.1 Introduction. Chapter 2 Alternatives Considered

Progress Report Sounder Program

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

DART Capital Program Update

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

Transit Project Delivery Status Report. Significant Issues

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Link Light Rail Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

1.0 Purpose and Need for Federal Way Link Extension

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Scope of Services January 26, Project Development and Conceptual Engineering for City of Lake Forest Amtrak Station

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

engineering phase and during the procurement of design build contracts.

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Request for Proposal for Trolley Security Services

CHAPTER 5 CAPITAL ASSETS

Transit Access Study

SWLRT Business Advisory Committee. October 10, 2012

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

King of Prussia Rail Project Frequently Asked Questions - Archive Version: Summer 2016

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Energy Technical Memorandum

Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

SFMTA Energy Use by Vehicle Type: Transit Investments vs Life Cycle Costs

congestion management program

FY 2018 Recommended Wake Transit Work Plan

Transcription:

Project Number SYS-LRT Subareas All Primary Mode Impacted Link Facility Type Link Service Version Number 4.0 Date Last Modified 7/24/2008 Project Locator Map Short Project Description Construct new light rail maintenance and operations facility capacity to accommodate light rail vehicle fleet. Purchase vehicles for light rail operations. Operate and maintain expanded light rail service between Lynnwood Transit Center, Overlake Transit Center, and S 272nd Street. Project Purpose: Provide systemwide elements to support expansion of Link light rail service. Cost in Millions of 2007 $ Forest Street Facility Low High Agency Admin $1.0 $1.2 Environmental Clearance and PE $0.0 $0.0 Final Design, Specs, Permitting $0.4 $0.5 ROW Acquisition $0.0 $0.0 Construction $5.0 $5.8 Contingency $2.2 $2.5 Total $8.7 $10.0 End-of-the-Line Terminals Low High Agency Admin $1.1 $1.3 Environmental Clearance and PE $0.8 $0.9 Final Design, Specs, Permitting $1.9 $2.2 ROW Acquisition $0.0 $0.0 Construction $16.4 $18.8 Contingency $1.5 $1.7 Total $21.7 $24.9 South Base Low High Agency Admin $9.9 $11.3 Environmental Clearance and PE $4.9 $5.6 Final Design, Specs, Permitting $12.2 $14.1 ROW Acquisition $40.8 $46.9 162.81 Construction $106.3 $122.3 Contingency $9.8 $11.3 Total $184.0 $211.6

Total Low High Agency Admin $12.0 $13.8 Environmental Clearance and PE $5.7 $6.5 Final Design, Specs, Permitting $14.6 $16.8 ROW Acquisition $40.8 $46.9 Construction $127.8 $146.9 Contingency $13.5 $15.5 O&M Facilities $214.4 $246.5 Vehicles for LRT System Total Light Rail Systems Capital Costs $506.7 $721.0 $753.1 Annual Added O&M* $78.4 * Includes maintenance facility operations Design Basis Conceptual Environmental Documentation Required Environmental Impact Statement Required Environmental Assessment Required Environmental Checklist Required Relationships to Other Projects Relationship Dependent on Project Partners Agency King County jurisdictions Snohomish County jurisdictions WSDOT KC Metro Long Description Project Link LRT extensions and all associated projects that they are dependent on or impacted by Bellevue, Redmond, SeaTac, Des Moines, Kent, Federal Way, Seattle, Shoreline and/or King County Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood and/or Snohomish County This capital project scope, and the companion capital cost estimate, are intended to include the entire project development cycle (agency and project administration, environmental clearance, design, all aspects of property acquisition, permits, agreements, construction, testing, commissioning and contingencies) from project initiation through the start-up of the revenue operations. Description: This project includes three systemwide components to support Link LRT system expansion: Purchase light rail vehicles (LRV) for service expansion. Ongoing operations and maintenance of expanded light rail service. Operations & maintenance facility capacity to support the future light rail vehicle fleet. Vehicles: Purchase up to 106 new 90-foot low-floor light rail vehicles (includes spares) to support expanded service to Lynnwood Transit Center, Overlake Transit Center and S. 272nd Street (Redondo/Star Lake). Combined with the 74 vehicles being purchased under Sound Move, the light rail fleet will total up to 180 vehicles by 2030. Operations: This project includes annual operating funds to operate and maintain all light rail system extensions to be built under the ST2 program. The operating plan supporting the light rail system in service between Lynnwood Transit Center, Overlake Transit Center and S 272nd Street at the completion of ST2 is anticipated to be as follows: Line 1a Lynnwood Transit Center to S 272nd Street: 4-car trains running every 7 minutes peak Line 1b Northgate Transit Center to S 272nd Street: 4-car trains running every 10 minutes off-peak Line 2 Lynnwood Transit Center to Overlake Transit Center: 3-car trains running every 7 minutes peak, 10 minutes off-peak

Description (continued): End-of-the-Line Terminal Facilities It is presumed that some vehicles will be stored overnight at the ends of the lines to provide operational flexibility and minimize the need for additional O&M facilities. Light rail vehicles will be stored at the terminal stations or on tail tracks adjacent to the stations at Lynnwood Transit Center, Overlake Transit Center, and S. 272nd Street. Up to 22 vehicles will be stored at these facilities. The costs of stations and tail track facilities are included in the light rail extension segment cost estimates. This project includes funds for terminal facilities such as, but not limited to, operator report/break space, security fencing to restrict access to parked LRT vehicles, and operator parking at the stations. Operations & Maintenance Facilities The Forest Street LRT O&M facility will provide light rail vehicle maintenance and storage capacity for up to 108 vehicles. Forest Street base expansion to accommodate and service the first 80 LRVs is already programmed in Sound Move. ST2 project N6 to extend the Central Link system from the University of Washington to Northgate includes budget to complete the deferred maintenance-of-way (MOW) building. This ST2 project (SYS-LRT) will fund four additional storage tracks and associated electrical system expansion to build out Forest Street to its 108-vehicle design capacity. Link LRT system expansion beyond 108 vehicles requires new maintenance base capacity, which will be provided at a new O&M facility to be built along the south corridor between SeaTac and S 272nd Street. That facility will be sized to store, operate and maintain at least 50 vehicles and, when combined with the Forest Street O&M facility and end-ofthe-line terminal facilities, will provide sufficient capacity to operate and maintain the entire LRT fleet of 180 cars through at least 2030. A representative site was used to develop cost estimates for the new maintenance facility. The final site would be determined through project level design and environmental review. The basic cost estimate includes design allowance contingency, construction change order contingency, and unallocated contingency. Project Elements Included in New O&M Facility: Site centrally located within the South light rail corridor, large enough to accommodate the maximum foreseeable vehicle storage capacity necessary during ST2, and to provide room to expand storage and/or maintenance facilities during possible future phases of Sound Transit light rail expansion. Lead track to/from the LRT guideway Service and storage track and switches Vehicle barn Train washer Maintenance-of-way facilities Administration offices Operator reporting, dispatching and break areas LRV parking and storage area Employee/visitor parking Environmental mitigation 1 percent for art per ST policy Allowances for: -- Site circulation -- Site landscaping / setbacks -- Stormwater detention

Project Elements Included in New O&M Facility (cont.): Equipment: based on the following types of equipment (includes "heavy" equipment) that are provided at Sound Transit's Forest Street Link Base: -- Underfloor wheel profiling system -- Jib cranes -- Rail yard shuttle -- Turntables - 60,000 lbs. -- Turntables - 16,000 lbs. -- Monorail cranes system -- Compressed air equipment -- Vehicle lifts -- Truck lift with turntable -- Truck repair lift -- Bridge crane - 10 ton (for maintenance of equipment) -- Bridge crane - 2 ton (for maintenance of way) -- Dock lifts -- LRV washer system -- Sand distribution equipment -- Industrial waste system -- Parking control equipment -- Spray paint booth -- Portable rail car lifts Maintenance base program contingency to provide flexibility to respond to specific site constraints and unforeseen risks in locating, permitting and building these large industrial facilities. Utilities: Utility investigations have not yet been carried out. Relocation of standard utilities along the alignment has been assumed as part of the scope and has been estimated using an average per route foot allowance. Standard public utilities will be provided at each base. Right-of-Way and Property Acquisition: Property interests required for the prototypical alignment include fee acquisitions, partial takes, easements and interagency agreements. Right-of-way requirements include construction staging and contractor laydown areas. No specific provisions are made for contractor parking. Cost estimates include associated relocation, administration and legal costs, and contingency. Mitigation: The final project scope will include all mitigation(s) committed to by ST in pertinent, future project-level environmental documents. Exclusions: Maintenance base capacity necessary to serve the light rail system between UW and SeaTac Airport. Maintenance of Way building (included in project N6). Permits Required: Building, electrical, mechanical, utility, construction-related, and land use permits by local jurisdictions BNSF permits / easements for access to the East base Agreements Required: Transitway agreements with jurisdictions in east and south King County Potential operating agreement with King County Metro ST has developed scope definitions for ST2 project proposals for the purposes of developing cost estimates, phasing of investments, a financial plan, and the estimation of project benefits. This scope definition should not be construed as a commitment that all defined features will be included in the final developed project.

Evaluation Measures Measure Measurement/ Rating Notes Average Weekday Ridership Capital Cost $721.0 - $753.1 in Millions of 2007 $ Annual Added O&M Costs $78.4 in Millions of 2007 $ Travel Time & Reliability Connectivity & Integration Land Use & Development Customer Experience Risk Avoidance Low Key Issues and Benefits Issues: - There is limited availability of land parcels in south King County near the light rail corridors to accommodate new LRT maintenance facilities. Benefits: - Facilities and additional fleet are necessary to support the light rail service expansion under ST2 - Additional maintenance facilities increase light rail operations efficiency and flexibility