White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems

Similar documents
BRAKE SYSTEM DESIGN AND THEORY

Design and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Design of Braking System of BAJA Vehicle

DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND FABRICATION OF BRAKING SYSTEM WITH REAR INBOARD BRAKES IN BAJA ATV

BRAKE SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS KARAN BHARDIYA ASSISTANT MANAGER -R&D ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. DISC BRAKES

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

PERFORMANCE BRAKE SYSTEMS

STUDY OF ROLL CENTER SAURABH SINGH *, SAGAR SAHU ** ABSTRACT

Suspension systems and components

Application Information

ABS keeps the vehicle steerable, even during an emergency braking

MOTORCYCLE BRAKING DYNAMICS

View Numbers and Units

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

C. Brake pads Replaceable friction surfaces that are forced against the rotor by the caliper piston.

Physics 2. Chapter 10 problems. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

LEAD SCREWS 101 A BASIC GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A LEAD SCREW ASSEMBLY FOR ANY DESIGN

MECA0494 : Braking systems

ISO 8855 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Road vehicles Vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability Vocabulary

SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS

iracing.com Williams-Toyota FW31 Quick Car Setup Guide

1 Summary PROPORTIONAL RESPONSE TECHNICAL SUMMARY. Contents

III B.Tech I Semester Supplementary Examinations, May/June

UNDERGROUND MINING. Mine hoist disc brake systems Improved safety, availability and productivity

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FORMULA SAE CAR SUSPENSION MEMBERS. For the degree of Master of Science in

HECU Clock frequency 32 MHz 50 MHz Memory 128 KB 512 KB Switch Orifice Orifice. Operating temperature - 40 C to 150 C - 40 C to 150 C

Chapter 15. Inertia Forces in Reciprocating Parts

TECHNICAL NOTE. NADS Vehicle Dynamics Typical Modeling Data. Document ID: N Author(s): Chris Schwarz Date: August 2006

TE 73 TWO ROLLER MACHINE

MECA0492 : Vehicle dynamics

Theory of Machines. CH-1: Fundamentals and type of Mechanisms

Chapter 15. Inertia Forces in Reciprocating Parts

The development of a differential for the improvement of traction control

Designing Stable Three Wheeled Vehicles, With Application to Solar Powered Racing Cars November 8, 2006 Revision. A Working Paper by:

association adilca THE BRAKING FORCE

Simple Gears and Transmission

White paper: Originally published in ISA InTech Magazine Page 1

didactecsanderson Mechanical & Automotive mechanisms MAM Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Apparatus Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Apparatus

Shock Absorbers What is Ride Control Vehicle Dynamics Suspension System Shock Absorbers Struts Terminology

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Simple Gears and Transmission

An Introduction to Brake Systems

Lecture 19. Magnetic Bearings

Simulating Rotary Draw Bending and Tube Hydroforming

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

Ball Rail Systems RE / The Drive & Control Company

Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670

Components of Hydronic Systems

Hovercraft

Design, Modelling & Analysis of Double Wishbone Suspension System

MECA0063 : Braking systems

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

YDRAULIC ISC BRAKES VERVIEW

Torsen Differentials - How They Work and What STaSIS Does to Improve Them For the Audi Quattro

Introduction. 3. The sample calculations used throughout this paper are based on a roadway posted at 35 mph.

Section 15 Unit Selection Procedures

Figure 1: Forces Are Equal When Both Their Magnitudes and Directions Are the Same

PRESEASON CHASSIS SETUP TIPS

Application Note #1013 Measuring the Behavior of Brake Materials More Efficiently: Correlation Between Benchtop and Dynamometer Tests

Modern Auto Tech Study Guide Chapters 71 & 73 Pages Brake Systems 49 Points. Automotive Service

CH16: Clutches, Brakes, Couplings and Flywheels

distance travelled circumference of the circle period constant speed = average speed =

SOME FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE PERFORMANCE OF

Brake System Fundamentals Chapter 71 Name Date Period

Chapter 33 Fundamentals of Hydraulic and Air-Over-Hydraulic Braking Systems

6: Vehicle Performance

DEVELOPMENT OF A LAP-TIME SIMULATOR FOR A FSAE RACE CAR USING MULTI-BODY DYNAMIC SIMULATION APPROACH

Analysis and control of vehicle steering wheel angular vibrations

LECTURE-23: Basic concept of Hydro-Static Transmission (HST) Systems

Introduction. Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines. Involute profile. 7. Gears

MOTOR VEHICLE HANDLING AND STABILITY PREDICTION

Rotational Kinematics and Dynamics Review

BRAKING SYSTEM DESIGN FOR ALL TERRIAN VEHICLE (ATV)

APPLICATION NOTE AN-ODP March 2009

A Brake Pad Wear Control Algorithm for Electronic Brake System

Can Physics Teaching be improved by Explanation of Tricks with

Introduction and Overview to Friction Brakes. Course 105 PREVIEW ONLY PARTICIPANT GUIDE

COMPACT CYLINDER CYLINDER FORCE AND WEIGHT TABLE BASE WEIGHT EFFECTIVE AREA

EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SHOCK AND VIBRATION CONTROL

Design Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles

Crash test facility simulates frontal, rear-end and side collision with acceleration pulses of up to 65 g and 85 km/h (53 mph)

4.4. Forces Applied to Automotive Technology. The Physics of Car Tires

Torque steer effects resulting from tyre aligning torque Effect of kinematics and elastokinematics

Vehicle Types and Dynamics Milos N. Mladenovic Assistant Professor Department of Built Environment

DRIVETRAIN 7.0 Introduction 7.1 Drivetrain configurations 7.2 Drivetrain elements 7.3 Clutch Operation

Design and Validation of Hydraulic brake system for Utility Vehicle

KINEMATICS OF REAR SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR A BAJA ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE.

The Mechanics of Tractor Implement Performance

White Paper. Phone: Fax: Advance Lifts, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Basics of Balancing 101

Collaborative vehicle steering and braking control system research Jiuchao Li, Yu Cui, Guohua Zang

The Application of Simulink for Vibration Simulation of Suspension Dual-mass System

White Paper: Brake Proportioning Valves. The True Story of a Misunderstood, Misused and Misnamed Brake System Component

Vehicle Dynamics and Drive Control for Adaptive Cruise Vehicles

Analysis of Big Data Streams to Obtain Braking Reliability Information July 2013, for 2017 Train Protection 1 / 25

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Surface- and Pressure-Dependent Characterization of SAE Baja Tire Rolling Resistance

2. Motion relationships and torques

Designing and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle

Transcription:

White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems The Conservation of Energy The braking system exists to convert the energy of a vehicle in motion into thermal energy, more commonly referred to as heat. From basic physics, the kinetic energy of a body in motion is defined as: where m v = the mass (commonly thought of as weight) of the vehicle in motion where v v = the velocity (commonly known as speed) of the vehicle in motion Ideally, this energy is completely absorbed by the braking system. While this is not entirely the case, for a stopping event at maximum deceleration most of the vehicle s kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy as defined by: where m b = the mass of the braking system components which absorb energy where C p = the specific heat of the braking system components which absorb energy (a constant based on material properties) where T b = the temperature rise experienced by the braking system components which absorb energy Note that for most single-stop events, the rotors serve as the primary energy absorbing components. It follows then that the temperature rise of the braking system is directly proportional to the mass of the vehicle in motion. More importantly perhaps, the temperature rise of the braking system is directly proportional to the square of the velocity of the vehicle in motion. In other words, doubling speed will theoretically quadruple brake temperatures: In practical application, tire rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, grade resistance, other mechanical losses will also play an energy-absorbing role, but value is still placed in establishing this fundamental relationship as a limiting condition. The Brake Pedal The brake pedal exists to multiply the force exerted by the driver s foot. From elementary statics, the force increase will be equal to the driver s applied force multiplied by the lever ratio of the brake pedal assembly: where F bp = the force output of the brake pedal assembly where F d = the force applied to the pedal pad by the driver where L 1 = the distance from the brake pedal arm pivot to the output rod clevis attachment where L 2 = the distance from the brake pedal arm pivot to the brake pedal pad Note that this relationship assumes 100% mechanical efficiency of all components in the brake pedal assembly. In practical application, the mechanical deflection of components friction present in physical interfaces prevents this condition. The Master Cylinder It is the functional responsibility of the master cylinder to translate the force from the brake pedal assembly into hydraulic fluid pressure. Assuming incompressible liquids infinitely rigid hydraulic vessels, the pressure generated by the master cylinder will be equal to:

where P mc = the hydraulic pressure generated by the master cylinder where A mc = the effective area of the master cylinder hydraulic piston Note that this relationship assumes 100% hydraulic efficiency of all components in the master cylinder assembly. In practical application, fluid properties, seal friction, compliance in the physical components prevents this condition. Brake Fluid, Brake Lines, Hoses It is the functional responsibility of the brake fluid, brake lines, hoses to transmit the hydraulic fluid pressure from the master cylinder to the calipers located at the wheel ends. Out of necessity, part of this subsystem must be constructed from flexible (compliant) materials, as the wheel ends are free to articulate relative to the vehicle s unsprung mass (most commonly known as the body structure). However, again assuming incompressible liquids infinitely rigid hydraulic vessels, the pressure transmitted to the calipers will be equal to: where P cal = the hydraulic pressure transmitted to the caliper Note that this relationship assumes 100% hydraulic efficiency of all brake fluid, brake lines, hoses. In practical application, fluid properties the compliance inherent in flexible brake hoses prevent this condition. The Caliper, Part I It is the first functional responsibility of the caliper to translate the hydraulic fluid pressure from the lines hoses into a linear mechanical force. Once again assuming incompressible liquids infinitely rigid hydraulic vessels, the one-sided linear mechanical force generated by the caliper will be equal to: where F cal = the one-sided linear mechanical force generated by the caliper where A cal = the effective area of the caliper hydraulic piston(s) found on one half of the caliper body Note that this relationship assumes 100% hydraulic efficiency of all components in the caliper assembly. In practical application, fluid properties, seal friction, compliance in the physical components prevents this condition. The Caliper, Part II It is the second functional responsibility of the caliper to react to the one-sided linear mechanical force in such a way that a clamping force is generated between the two halves of the caliper body. Regardless of caliper design (fixed body or floating body), the clamping force will be equal to, in theory, twice the linear mechanical force as follows: where F clamp = the clamp force generated by the caliper Note that this relationship assumes 100% mechanical efficiency of all components in the caliper assembly. In practical application, mechanical deflection, in the case of floating caliper bodies, the friction in the caliper slider assembly components prevents this condition. The Brake Pads It is the functional responsibility of the brake pads to generate a frictional force which opposes the rotation of the spinning rotor assembly. This frictional force is related to the caliper clamp force as follows:

where F friction = the frictional force generated by the brake pads opposing the rotation of the rotor where µ bp = the coefficient of friction between the brake pad the rotor Note that this relationship assumes 100% mechanical efficiency of all components at the brake pad interface. In practical application, mechanical deflection (compressibility) of the brake pad materials friction found between the brake pad the caliper body components prevents this condition. In addition, it should be noted that the coefficient of friction between the brake pad the rotor is not a single fixed value, but rather changes dynamically with time, temperature, pressure, wear, such. The Rotor While the rotor serves as the primary heat sink in the braking system, it is the functional responsibility of the rotor to generate a retarding torque as a function of the brake pad frictional force. This torque is related to the brake pad frictional force as follows: where T r = the torque generated by the rotor where R eff = the effective radius (effective moment arm) of the rotor (measured from the rotor center of rotation to the center of pressure of the caliper pistons) Because the rotor is mechanically coupled to the hub wheel assembly, because the tire is assumed to be rigidly attached to the wheel, the torque will be constant throughout the entire rotating assembly as follows: where T t = the torque found in the tire where T w = the torque found in the wheel Note that this relationship assumes 100% mechanical efficiency of all components at the wheel end. In practical application, mechanical deflection relative motion between the rotating components prevents this condition. The Tire Assuming that there is adequate traction (friction) between the tire the road to accommodate the driver s braking request, the tire will develop slip in order to react the torque found in the rotating assembly. The amount of slip generated will be a function of the tire s output characteristics (the mu-slip relationship), but the force reacted at the ground will be equal to: where F tire = the force reacted between the tire the ground (assuming friction exists to support the force) where R t = the effective rolling radius (moment arm) of the loaded tire Up to this point our analysis has consisted of a single wheel brake assembly; however, because modern vehicles have one wheel brake assembly at each corner of the car, there are actually four tire forces being reacted during a typical stopping event. Because of this condition, the total braking force generated is defined as the sum of the four contact patch forces as follows:

where F total = the total braking force reacted between the vehicle the ground (assuming adequate traction exists) Deceleration of a Vehicle in Motion Based on the work of Sir Isaac Newton, if a force is exerted on a body it will experience a commensurate acceleration. Convention dictates that accelerations which oppose the direction of travel are called decelerations. In the case of a vehicle experiencing a braking force, the deceleration of the vehicle will be equal to: where a v = the deceleration of the vehicle Kinematics Relationships of Vehicles Experiencing Deceleration Integrating the deceleration of a body in motion with respect to time allows for the determination of speed. Integrating yet again allows for the determination of position. Applying this relationship to a vehicle experiencing a linear deceleration, the theoretical stopping distance of a vehicle in motion can be calculated as follows: where SD v = the stopping distance of the vehicle Note that this equation assumes a step-input deceleration from a fixed speed followed by a linear constant rate of deceleration until the vehicle comes to rest. In practical application, deceleration cannot be achieved instantaneously, nor can deceleration be assumed to be constant for the duration of a stopping event. Determining Parameters Related to Vehicle Static Weight Distribution When either at rest or under conditions of zero acceleration, a vehicle will have a fixed distribution of mass (more commonly referred to as weight) which results in the four corners of the vehicle each suspending a fixed percentage of the total. In the side view, the sum of the left front right front weights will equal the front axle weight the sum of the left rear right rear weights will equal the rear axle weight. If these values are known, then one can quickly calculate the static weight distribution as follows: where V f = the front axle vertical force (weight) where V r = the rear axle vertical force (weight) where V t = the total vehicle vertical force (weight) If the static weight distribution is known, then calculating the longitudinal position of the vehicle s center of gravity (CG) is simply a function of geometry as follows:

where CG f,x = distance from the front axle to the CG where CG r,x = distance from the rear axle to the CG where WB = the vehicle wheelbase (distance from the front axle to the rear axle) From these relationships, it naturally follows that: Dynamic Impacts of Vehicles Experiencing Deceleration Whenever a vehicle experiences a deceleration, the effective normal force (again, more commonly referred to as weight) reacted at the four corners of the vehicle will change. While the total vehicle normal force remains constant, the front axle normal force during a deceleration event will increase while the rear axle normal force will decrease by the same amount. As the following equation demonstrates, the magnitude is a function of deceleration vehicle geometry: where WT = the absolute weight transferred from the rear axle to the front axle where g = the acceleration due to gravity (effectively expressing av in units of g s) where h CG = the vertical distance from the CG to ground In order to calculate the steady-state vehicle axle vertical forces during a given stopping event, the weight transferred must be added to the front axle static weight subtracted from the rear axle static weight as follows: where V f,d = the front axle dynamic vertical force for a given deceleration where V r,d = the rear axle dynamic vertical force for a given deceleration From these relationships, it naturally follows that for any given deceleration:

Effects of Weight Transfer on Tire Output As a vehicle experiences dynamic weight transfer, the ability of each axle to provide braking force is altered. Under static conditions, the maximum braking force that an axle is capable of producing is defined by the following relationships: where F tires,f = the combined front tire braking forces where F tires,r = the combined rear tire braking forces where µ peak,f = the maximum effective coefficient of friction between the front tires the road where µ peak,r = the maximum effective coefficient of friction between the rear tires the road However, as a result of weight transfer during a deceleration event the maximum braking force that an axle is capable of producing is modified as follows: As shown by the relationships above, weight transfer increases the ability of the front axle to provide braking force while simultaneously decreasing the ability of the rear axle to provide braking force. Note that in this analysis it is assumed that µ peak,f µ peak,r are independent of deceleration, when in practice they are sensitive to the loading changes brought about by the weight transfer phenomenon. Consequently, as weight is transferred the total vehicle deceleration capability is diminished by a small amount. Calculating Optimum Brake Balance In order to achieve optimum brake balance, or to achieve 100% base brake efficiency, the ratio of the front rear braking forces will be equal to the ratio of the front rear vertical forces (axle weights). Under static conditions, this leads to: However, as the brakes are applied the effects of weight transfer must be considered, as the ratio of front rear vertical forces will change as follows: From this relationship it becomes apparent that while the ratio of the front rear braking forces is a fixed parameter based on the mechanical sizing of the brake system components, the ratio of the front rear vertical forces is a variable based on deceleration vehicle geometry. This dictates that the relationship can only be optimized for only one vehicle deceleration level loading condition (typically at maximum deceleration with the highest percentage of static front weight).

Author s disclaimer: Mechanical systems operating in the physical world are neither 100% efficient nor are they capable of instantaneous changes in state. Consequently, the equations relationships presented herein are approximations of these braking system components as best as we underst their mechanizations physical attributes. Where appropriate, several examples of limiting conditions primary inefficiencies have been identified, but please do not assume these partial lists to be all-encompassing or definitive in their qualifications. by James Walker, Jr., exclusively for Centric Parts/StopTech About Centric Parts Centric Parts, which includes the StopTech Power Slot divisions, is a leading manufacturer supplier of aftermarket brake components systems for everyday cars, performance duty vehicles ultra performance vehicles. The Southern California company was founded in 2000 now employs over 500 workers at its multiple warehouse production facilities that total more than half a million square feet of floor space. The company s skilled seasoned engineers experts, an award-winning executive team drawn from across the industry, fuel Centric Parts mastery of the automotive aftermarket its dedication to research development. The patent-holding company also has one of the industry s best programs for tracking cataloging original equipment parts uses this expertise to devise deliver quality aftermarket OE parts for consumers, technicians auto makers. About StopTech StopTech, the ultra performance racing division of Centric Parts, is a leading innovator of world class brake components systems for production-based racing cars high performance vehicles on the street track. Founded in 1999, StopTech was the first to offer Balanced Brake Upgrades for production cars remains the worldwide leader with over 650 platform offerings to dramatically improve overall braking performance. StopTech s industry leading technologies materials, from rock solid calipers to ingeniously efficient heat hling rotors, result in shorter stopping distances, better brake modulation less brake fade. # # # #