Combined Catalyzed Soot Filter and SCR Catalyst System for Diesel Engine Emission Reduction

Similar documents
Future Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For a Better Environment. Diesel WG Report. September 25, 2000

Overview of HD Diesel Emission Control. Tim Johnson May 22, 2008

INTERNATIONAL Diesel Engine Emissions Requirements & Technology

Emission Control Technology for Stationary Diesel Engines

Hydrocarbon fouling of Cu- and Fe-zeolite SCR catalysts in conventional and advanced diesel combustion modes

Analytical Tool Development for Aftertreatment Sub-Systems Integration

Catalytic Coatings for Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration

Harmonised and Non-road Cycles from

Heavy-Duty Diesel Emission Control Technologies to Achieve Future Emission Reduction Goals

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

Diesel Emission Control Technologies: New and In-use Engines

Use of a Diesel Fuel Processor for Rapid and Efficient Regeneration of Single Leg NOx Adsorber Systems

Rita Aiello/5 December 2016/Johnson Matthey, Stationary Emissions Control

Report on tests at LTH May 2018

Advanced Catalyst Systems for HDD On-Road BS VI and Off-Road Trem IV

New Technology Diesel Engines: Eliminating NOx Emissions from Higher Biodiesel Blends in Un-modified Diesel Engines

Technologies for Heavy-duty Engines

APBF-DEC Heavy Duty NOx Adsorber/DPF Project: Heavy Duty Linehaul Platform Project Update

Light Duty Truck Aftertreatment - Experience and Challenges. Fabien Redon, Houshun Zhang, Charlie Freese and Nabil Hakim. Detroit Diesel Corporation

Further Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For Better Air Quality. 5 th JCAP Conference. Diesel WG Report.

Overview of Diesel Emission Control Retrofit Options

Catalytic Purifier for Diesel Engines

Recent Developments in Diesel Engine Emission Control Technology

Case study on Selective catalytic reduction(scr) performance improvement over legislative engine cycles using 1D simulation

Retrofit Emission Controls for On- and Off-Road Diesel Engines

Strategies for Integrated Emission Control. Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc 1

Euro VI Programme and Emissions Results on European Cycles

Emission Control Technologies for Locomotive Diesel Engines

Roll out of SCR on Filter..

Hydrogen generation from plasmatron reformers and use for diesel exhaust aftertreatment *

Recent Developments in Diesel Engine Emission Control Technology. Diesel Emission Control Technology Is Making Significant Progress

Investigation of the Feasibility of Achieving Euro VI Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions Limits by Advanced Emissions Controls

Additions, Revisions, or Updates

Integrated Engine and Aftertreatment System Technology for EPA 2010 Heavy-duty Emissions Regulations

Objectives. WP7: On-engine aftertreatment systems. WP Leader: Jukka Leinonen. Partners:

Presented by. Navistar Education 2015

"Update on Diesel Emission Control Technologies"

Diesel Retrofit Programs to Clean-up In-Use Vehicles - U.S. Experience

2013 Aftertreatment System with SCR Overview for Technicians Study Guide

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

Nature and origin of atmospheric pollutants. Outline. CO emissions in Europe CO emissions in Europe

Effect of Biodiesel Fuel on Emissions from Diesel Engine Complied with the Latest Emission Requirements in Japan Ref: JSAE Paper No.

Low Temperature Aftertreatment for Future Engines Challenges and Opportunities

Fuel Processor Enabled NOx Adsorber After-Treatment System for Diesel Engine Emissions Control

Internal Combustion Engines

Study of NOx selective catalytic reduction by ethanol over Ag/Al 2 O 3 catalyst on a HD diesel engine

Diesel Exhaust Emission Control Technologies for Asian Market 亚洲市场柴油机废气排放控制技术

SPN 4364/FMI 17 - GHG17 SPN /FMI 16 - GHG17 SPN /FMI 14 - GHG17 SPN 3216/FMI 16 - GHG17 SPN 3216/FMI 18 - GHG17 SPN 3217/FMI 2 - GHG17

Diesel Aftertreatment Systems

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

NACT 271 Stationary Reciprocating Engines

Texas Technology Showcase March 2003 Houston, TX

Additions, Revisions, or Updates

Additions, Revisions, or Updates

EPA Tier 4 and the Electric Power Industry

Fuel Effects Issues for In-Use Diesel Applications

Emissions and Fuel Consumption Trade-offs of a Turbocharged Diesel Engine Equipped with Electrically Heated Catalyst

Background. NOx and PM Standards have driven diesel engine design for two decades

NEW DIESEL EMISSIONS CONTROL STRATEGY for US TIER 2

Objectives. WP7: On-engine aftertreatment systems. WP Leader: Jukka Leinonen. Partners:

EPA TIER 4 AND THE ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY. Tim Cresswell Tier 4 Product Definition Manager Electric Power Division

Advanced Maritime Emissions Control System (AMECS )

SCR-Solutions for BS IV and BS V Regulations

Additions, Revisions, or Updates

SCR and HAPs Converters for Stationary Engines

A&WMA, CA SCAQMD, Diamond Bar, CA. Challenges for Meeting New Lower Air Emissions

Digital Michigan Tech. Michigan Technological University. Vaibhav Kadam Michigan Technological University,

Future Directions in Diesel SCR Systems

Emission controls for NOx compliance Challenges & Applications. Greener Shipping Summit November 2017

Miretti Emission Control Systems Marine Applications

LNT Catalysis at Ford Motor Company A Case History

Advanced Petroleum-Based Fuels - Diesel Emissions Control (APBF-DEC) Project

DIESEL OXIDATION CATALYST CONTROL OF PM, CO AND HC FROM REACTIVITY CONTROLLED COMPRESSION IGNITION COMBUSTION

Comparing the EPA Non-road Transient Cycle (NRTC) with CanmetMINING LHD test cycles.

Emission Control Technology for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

Verified Retrofit Technologies and Product Offerings. Northeast Diesel Collaborative February 26, 2015

Implementation and Challenges of RDE with BSVI Norms

The California Demonstration Program for Control of PM from Diesel Backup Generators (BUGs)

General Presentation

Technology Choices. New Bus Purchases Fleet Make-up Engine Models & Years Driver Education & Support Duty Cycles Fuel Use & Storage

Fuel-Borne Reductants for NOx Aftertreatment: Preliminary EtOH SCR Study

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis Novosibirsk, Russia

Module 6:Emission Control for CI Engines Lecture 31:Diesel Particulate Filters (contd.) The Lecture Contains: Passive/Catalytic Regeneration

Providing clean DPF technology for Iran. Soot-free Teheran

NO 2 Emissions from Exhaust Aftertreatment Technology

Multi-Pollutant Catalyst for Combustion Turbine Power Plants

Retrofit Program of a EURO 1 & EURO 2 Urban Bus Fleet in La Rochelle: Status after One Year Experience

AECC HEAVY DUTY NRMM TEST PROGRAMME: PARTICLE MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERISATION

Black Carbon Emissions From Diesel Engines - Technical And Policy Options For Reduction. Dr Richard O Sullivan 22 March 2012

COST EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION. A. Selective Catalytic Reduction System

A Close Analysis of Developments in Diesel Engine Emission Reduction Technologies

ENGINE TECHNOLOGY. Bobcat Engine_B _ _EN_reworked.indd 1

AECC Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) Test Programme: Particle Measurement and Characterisation

DOC design & sizing using GT-SUITE European GT Conference Gauthier QUENEY 09/10/2017

Product line : Marine

Installation Guide Diesel Particulate Filters with DiNLOG Monitoring System

Exhaust After-Treatment System. This information covers design and function of the Exhaust After-Treatment System (EATS) on the Volvo D16F engine.

-focusing on effects of sulfur on latest aftertreatment devices-

Urea SCR and DPF System for Diesel Sport Utility Vehicle Meeting Tier II Bin 5

Transcription:

Combined Catalyzed Soot Filter and SCR Catalyst System for Diesel Engine Emission Reduction By R.M. Kakwani, K.Voss, J. Patchett & K.Grimston Engelhard Corporation 6th Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction (DEER) Workshop August 20-24, 2000 San Diego, California

DPX Catalytic Soot Filter Substantially reduces particulate emission for diesel vehicles Up to 90% effective against carbonaceous particulate matter Significantly reduces CO and HC Filter regenerates at normal diesel operation temperatures Removable design for easy cleaning and maintenance

Controlling NOx NOxCat ZNX catalysts A unique technology for higher temperature applications Ideal for simple cycle gas turbines, chemical processes and reciprocating engines Most effective at 675 F (357 C) to 1075 F (580 C) Highly active zeolite catalytic coatings Ceramic structures in composite honeycomb configurations

Schematic of Engine Bench Set-Up for Testing Combined Catalyzed Soot Filter & SCR Catalyst System Cleaned Exhaust (Very low TPM, NOx, HC & CO) S SCR Cleaned Exhaust with NOx + Urea - NH3 (Very low TPM, HC and CO) S S SCR 7.2 liter Diesel Engine 300 HP @ 2200 RPM Exhaust with TPM, NOx, HC & CO CSF S Urea Solution, Air-Assist Injector

NOx Conversion Performance of SCR Catalyst vs. CSF+SCR System as a Function of at 470 C SCR Inlet Temperature 100 1800 RPM/100% Load, 470C, SCR GHSV = 51.33K hr-1, Engine-Out NOx = 780 ppm 80 NOx Conversion (%) 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

NOx Conversion Performance of SCR Catalyst vs. CSF+SCR as a Function of at 345 C SCR Inlet Temperature 100 1800 RPM/60% Load, 345C, SCR GHSV = 46.94K hr-1, Engine-Out NOx = 400 ppm 80 NOx Conversion (%) 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

NOx Conversion Performance of SCR Catalyst vs. CSF+SCR as a Function of at 200 C SCR Inlet Temperature 100 1800 RPM/14% Load, 200C, SCR GHSV = 28.31K hr-1, Engine-Out NOx = 200 ppm NOx Conversion (%) 80 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Engine Test Results for CSF+SCR System NOx Conversion vs. NOx Conversion (%) 100 80 60 40 20 200C 345C 470C 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Maximum NH3 slip for SCR vs. CSF+SCR System as a Function of at 470 C SCR Inlet Temperature 1800 RPM/100% Load, 470C, SCR GHSV = 51.33K hr-1, Engine-Out NOx = 780 ppm 100 Max. NH3 Break-Thru (ppm) 80 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 NSF

Maximum NH3 slip for SCR vs. CSF+SCR System as a Function of at 200 C SCR Inlet Temperature 120 1800 RPM/14% Load, 200C, SCR GHSV = 28.31K hr-1, Engine-Out NOx = 200 ppm Max. NH3 Break-Thru (ppm) 100 80 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

NOx Conversion Performance of SCR Catalyst vs. CSF+SCR as a Function of Inlet Temperature for Middle Range of Values 100 Middle Range (0.42-0.57) 80 NOx Conversion (%) 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 SCR Inlet Temp. (C)

NOx Conversion Performance of SCR Catalyst vs. CSF+SCR as a Function of Inlet Temperature for High Range of Values 100 High Range (0.61-0.78) 80 NOx Conversion (%) 60 40 20 ZNX CSF+ZNX 0 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 SCR Inlet Temp.(C)

SCR Only, ESC Cycle (13-mode OICA) @ 300 HP Rating Avg. SCR Inlet Temp. = 357 C Avg. SCR Outlet Temp. = 368 C Avg. NOx Conversion = 67.3% Avg. = 0.985 NH3 Slip (max) = 241 ppm 110% 100% Emissions in g/kw-hr HC CO NOx Engine Out: 0.09 0.96 6.34 SCR Out: 0.04 0.83 2.07 1.1 1.0 90% 0.9 % NOx Conversion 80% 70% 60% NOx 0.8 0.7 0.6 50% 0.5 40% Rated 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 OICA Mode# 0.4

CSF+SCR, ESC Cycle (13-mode OICA) @ 300 HP Rating Avg. CSF Inlet Temp. = 399 C Avg. SCR Inlet Temp. = 367 C Avg. SCR Outlet Temp. = 376 C Avg. NOx Conversion = 85.1% Avg. = 0.976 NH3 Slip = 0 ppm 110% 100% Emissions in g/kw-hr HC CO NOx Engine Out: 0.12 1.18 6.18 CSF Out: 0.03 0.07 6.17 SCR Out: 0.03 0.07 0.92 1.1 1.0 % NOx Conversion 90% 80% 70% 60% NOx 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 50% 0.5 40% Rated 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 OICA Mode# 0.4

SCR Only, ESC Cycle (13-mode OICA) @ 180 HP Rating Avg. SCR Inlet Temp. = 288 C Avg. SCR Outlet Temp. = 300 C Avg. NOx Conversion = 58.2% Avg. = 0.921 NH3 Slip (max) = 310 ppm 110% 100% Emissions in g/kw-hr HC CO NOx Engine Out: 0.17 1.13 6.02 SCR Out: 0.07 1.09 2.51 NOx 1.1 1.0 % NOx Conversion 90% 80% 70% 60% 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 50% 0.5 40% Rated 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 OICA Mode# 0.4

CSF+SCR, ESC Cycle (13-mode OICA) @ 180 HP Rating 110% Avg. CSF Inlet Temp. = 321 C Avg. SCR Inlet Temp. = 296 C Avg. SCR Outlet Temp. = 303 C Avg. NOx Conversion = 89.9% Avg. = 0.963 NH3 Slip = 0 ppm Emissions in g/kw-hr HC CO NOx Engine Out: 0.19 1.42 6.01 CSF Out: 0.05 0.11 5.98 SCR Out: 0.04 0.10 0.61 1.2 100% 1.1 90% 1.0 %NOxConversion 80% 70% 60% 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 50% NOx 0.5 40% Rated 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 OICA Mode# 0.4

Catalyzed Soot Filter + Urea SCR System ESC Cycles Summary Rating Configur ation Temperatures, deg C Avg. Avg. NOx Conv. Max NH3 Slip SCR Out Emissions, g/kw-hr HP CSF In SCR In SCR Out % ppm HC CO NOx 300 SCR 357 368 0.985 67.3% 241 0.04 0.83 2.07 300 CSF+SCR 399 367 376 0.976 85.1% 0 0.03 0.07 0.92 180 SCR 288 300 0.921 58.2% 310 0.07 1.09 2.51 180 CSF+SCR 321 296 303 0.963 89.9% 0 0.04 0.1 0.61

Combined Catalyzed Soot Filter and SCR Catalyst System for Diesel Engine Emission Reduction - Summary - Steady State Tests Showed: Slight advantage of CSF+SCR as compared to SCR alone at high inlet temperature (470 C). Both configurations achieved 80-90% NOx conversion for =0.8-0.9 For lower inlet temperatures (345 C & 200 C) the CSF+SCR configuration achieved substantially better NOx conversion as compared to SCR alone. CSF+SCR attained 70-90% NOx conversion for = 0.7-0.9. The activity for NOx conversion for SCR alone decreased with decreasing inlet temperature while CSF+SCR maintained activity. The CSF+SCR system achieved 70% NOx conversion at 200 C for 0.7-0.85 as compared to 10% for the SCR alone. This indicates that CSF+SCR is viable for light load and light-duty diesel applications.

Combined Catalyzed Soot Filter and SCR Catalyst System for Diesel Engine Emission Reduction - Summary (Continued) - ESC Cycle Testing Showed: For the 300 HP rating at an average exhaust temperature of 360 C, the SCR catalyst alone achieved 67% cycle NOx reduction at 0.98 with NH3 slip as compared to 85% NOx reduction for the CSF+SCR system with no NH3 slip. For the 180 HP rating at an average exhaust temperature of 290 C, the SCR catalyst alone achieved 58% cycle NOx reduction at 0.92 with NH3 slip as compared to 90% NOx reduction for the CSF+SCR system at 0.96 with no NH3 slip. Due to higher NOx conversion and better NH3 utilization with the CSF+SCR system, NH3 slip was substantially reduced.