Transit dependence and choice riders in the NHTS 2009: Improving our understanding of transit markets

Similar documents
American Driving Survey,

Public Transit in America:

Predicted response of Prague residents to regulation measures

A Joint Tour-Based Model of Vehicle Type Choice, Tour Length, Passenger Accompaniment, and Tour Type

Ministry of Infrastructure and Watermanagement

Developing a Toll Demand Model for DelDOT s Statewide Travel Demand Model

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

Analyzing Uber s Ride-sharing Economy

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Results from the North American E-bike Owner Survey

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Use of National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Data in Assessment of Impacts of PHEVs on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions and Electricity Demand

Factors Affecting Vehicle Use in Multiple-Vehicle Households

Tony Roma s (Closed) Fully Equipped Restaurant Building

The proposed Escondido Village Graduate Student Housing project would include the following features:

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

ACCESS MODE CHOICE MODEL FOR INTERCITY PASSENGER TRAVEL. Prof. CSRK Prasad Head, Transportation Division NIT Warangal

Parking Pricing As a TDM Strategy

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

CHART BOOK ON WAGES, OPERATING COSTS, AND COST OF LIVING

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

1 Have you used Sun Trolley (which also includes Riverwalk Trolley)? Yes (Go to Question #2) No (Go to Question #10)

An analysis of household vehicle ownership and utilization patterns in the United States using the 2001 National Household Travel Survey

Carsharing for Older Populations

FOR SALE. Texarkana, TX $1,100,000 MultiFamily S. Lake Drive PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS

Exploring Changing Travel Trends

Kauai Resident Travel Survey: Summary of Results

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

Building a Database for Estimation of an Advanced Activity-Based Travel Model from the NHTS

Drivers License Status Report for Milwaukee County

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Overview Data

Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

Travel Decisions Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

New York City Motorcycle Safety Study ALLEN MALLS: BEFORE, TEMPORARY MATERIALS, AFTER (CAPITAL): CHINATOWN (MANHATTAN)

Insights into experiences and risk perception of riders of fast e-bikes

DOT HS April 2013

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. October 2014

Do U.S. Households Favor High Fuel Economy Vehicles When Gasoline Prices Increase? A Discrete Choice Analysis

Traffic Safety Facts 2002

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

2011 Traffic Safety Culture Index

American Driving Survey: Methodology and Year One Results, May 2013 May Saving lives through research and education.

Transportation Issues Poll New York City Speed Safety Cameras in School Zones

Metra Milwaukee District West Line Transit-Friendly Development Plan

Demographics Booklet

201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

An Evaluation on the Compliance to Safety Helmet Usage among Motorcyclists in Batu Pahat, Johor

Measuring Rail Transit's Sustainability Goals: A Before-After, Experimental-Control Evaluation of Los Angeles' Expo Light Rail Line

Fare pricing elasticity, subsidies and the demand for vanpool services

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

An Investigation of the Distribution of Driving Speeds Using In-vehicle GPS Data. Jianhe Du Lisa Aultman-Hall University of Connecticut

Estimation of value of time for autonomous driving using revealed and stated preferences method

MULTIMODAL ACCESS TO TWIN. CITIES TRANSITWAYS Jacqueline Nowak. University of Minnesota FIRST UP CONSULTANTS. Source

Understanding Traffic Data: How To Avoid Making the Wrong Turn

I.11Tc1ER.S Eagleton nstitute PoIitcs New Bruriswck Ne s Jersey : C[Lic 4ar-ICbgCr/EAGLETON POLL

Small Urban & Rural Transit Center

Performance of Urban Transit in Jordan

Customer Preferences & Solar PV Adoption

DAILY TRAVEL AND CO 2 EMISSIONS FROM PASSENGER TRANSPORT: A COMPARISON OF GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES

Parking & TOD around BART Stations. Jessica ter Schure November 1, 2009 Rail~Volution 2009 Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract. Context 7/30/2010 1

Naturalistic Experiment to Simulate Travel Behavior Implications of Self-Driving Vehicles: The Chauffeur Experiment

car2go Toronto Proposal for on-street parking pilot project

Criticism of Romney s Campaign Grows; Six in 10 Rate His Efforts Negatively

CHANGE IN DRIVERS PARKING PREFERENCE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF STRENGTHENED PARKING REGULATIONS

North Florida Transportation Survey

Evaluating Marginal-Cost Vehicle Mileage Fee with Econometric Demand Models

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Statement before the Maryland House Committee on Environmental Matters. Passenger Restrictions for Young Drivers. Stephen L. Oesch

ITSMR Research Note. Motorcyclists and Impaired Driving ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION KEY FINDINGS. September 2013

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership & Use. Outline

Who s on First: Early Adopters of Self-Driving Vehicles

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

WORTHINGTON SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS REPORT JANUARY 25, 2019

NEXT. Powered by Qualtrics. 10/3/2018 Potholes & politics

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Impacts of Ridesourcing: Opportunities and Risks with MaaS

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

Transit and Job Growth: Lessons for SB 375. Jed Kolko Public Policy Institute of California

A Conceptual Model To Explain, Predict and Improve User Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles

IIHS activities on alcohol-impaired driving

4 th IRTAD CONFERENCE Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

Vers. 2.3 travel model, trip generation: Development of trip production model

AN EXAMINATION OF THE FACTORS THAT IMPACT UPON MULTIPLE VEHICLE OWNERSHIP: THE CASE OF DUBLIN, IRELAND

Rui Wang Assistant Professor, UCLA School of Public Affairs. IACP 2010, Shanghai June 20, 2010

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Transcription:

Transit dependence and choice riders in the NHTS 2009: Improving our understanding of transit markets Ugo Lachapelle, Ph.D., UBC Post Doc, Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers Using NHTS Data for Transportation Decision Making June 6 and 7, 2011, Washington, DC

Background Transit users from all socio-demographics (Polzin & Chu, 2005) Choice and dependent transit riders (Bullard et al., 2004; Krizek & El-Geneidy, 2007) Car no car Dependent by choice (Sanchez and Brenman, 2007) Importance: Marketing of public transit Multimodal transportation (Krygsman, 2004) Benefits of active lifestyle (TRB-IOM, 2005) Social Justice (Bullard et al., 2004; Lucas, 2004) ( APTA, 2003; Sanchez and Brenman, 2007)

Objectives Create a typology of transit markets Describe differences in: Socio-demographics Transportation issues Transit, walking an bicycling trips Transit service characteristics

Transit service characteristics Access Wait time Travel time Speed Are there differences in indicators of transit service quality across transit markets?

Methods: NHTS 2009 Cross-sectional, Individual level and trip file, age 16-92 Outcomes Used transit in past month, # of trips Walk, bicycle trip # in past week Transit service: Access, wait time, speed, travel time Independent Car availability-based typology of transit markets Socio-demographics, built environment, NY-NJ Logit, negative binomial, OLS. Estimated marginal means

Typology of car availability Choice riders Households Individuals Vehicles Fully motorized % of survey % used transit Total # of transit users 74.9% 12.9% 17,240 Licensed Partially motorized 13.6% 21.5 % 4,161 Motorized Unlicensed 8.1 % 19.7% 2,166 16 and older Carless Licensed Unlicensed 1% 69 % 1,814 2.4% 41.9 % 1,890 Transit dependent Total 100% 27,271

Socio-demographic characteristics Income 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Fully motorized C Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed C H, Y R, A Carless UNlicensed H, R, U «$5,000 - $14,999 $15,000 - $29,999 $30,000 - $44,999 $45,000 - $59,999 $60,000 - $79,999» $80,000 C = Children; Y = Younger; H = Hispanic; R = Renter; A = Lives alone; U = Unemployed

Most important issue Percent 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed Highway congestion Lack of walkways or sidewalks Access to / availability of public transit

Travel For monthly transit user (weighted) Used transit in past month Transit trips in past month Walk trips in past week Bicycle trips in past week Car Availability Fully motorized [Ref.] Partially motorized 0.5088*** 0.3861*** 0.1176*** 0.3548*** Unlicensed motorized 0.6190*** 0.2010*** -0.0039-0.1237** Carless licensed 2.5463*** 0.7360*** 0.2321*** 0.5104*** Carless UNlicensed 1.7642*** 0.0844*** -0.0384** 0.6224*** Age -0.0153*** -0.0017*** -0.0029*** -0.0176*** Women -0.0854*** -0.0476*** -0.1175*** -0.9232*** «$5,000 - $14,999 [Ref.] $15,000 - $29,999-0.2929*** 0.0941*** -0.0125 0.0839 $30,000 - $44,999-0.3024*** 0.1435*** 0.0733*** -0.0424 $45,000 - $59,999-0.2388*** -0.0252** -0.0083 0.0979* $60,000 - $79,999-0.0689* -0.0039 0.0321** 0.1122*» $80,000 0.3309*** -0.1234*** 0.0730*** 0.1748*** Worker -0.2469*** -0.2891*** -0.005-0.2559*** MSA Does not have rail -0.7324*** 0.2273*** 0.0601*** 0.1299*** Renter 0.2804*** -0.0299*** 0.0590*** -0.1151*** Tract Resid. Density 0.0001*** 0.0000*** 0.0000*** -0.0000*** NY NJ LI CMSA 0.3746*** 0.0117-0.1610** -0.4145* Tract empl. Density 0.0000*** -0.0000*** 0.0000*** 0.0000*** Constant -0.1839* 2.1986*** 1.7008*** 1.1030*** Observations 159238 25550 25353 25522-2ll Chi square value 18000.00 48000.00 6593.02 4082.69 p-value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Pseudo R square 0.128 0.085 0.027 0.071 * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 missing race4 ethnicity;

Transit use and transit trips Probability 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Number of transit trips 0 10 20 30 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Walk and bicycle trips Number of walk trips 0 2 4 6 8 Number of bicycle trips 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Access time Access to transit (min) 0 2 4 6 8 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Wait Time Wait time (min) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Travel time Trave time (min) 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Travel Distance Trip distance (miles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Speed Speed (mph) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless licensed Carless UNlicensed

Discussion Gradient across income in car availability Women more likely to be carless Carless licensed riders use transit and walk more than others Service quality lower for transit dependence New survey items on attitudes to identify dependent by choice groups of users Changes between 2001-2009?

Conclusion Large variations among transit users Socio-demographic Car availability Travel patterns Important transportation issue Service quality Transit dependence and multimodal travel But TOD often unaffordable Reducing car ownership Fully motorized Partially motorized Unlicensed motorized Carless Licensed Carless Unlicensed

The 13 is late again! Wait time