To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

Similar documents
Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to Indiana growing conditions.

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger. Objective

2005 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of turf-type tall fescue under high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

To evaluate commercial and experimental varieties of Kentucky bluegrass under low maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT PERMISSION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT PERMISSION

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program Tests. University of California, Riverside. Priti Saxena and Jim Baird

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

1997 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007)

Kentucky bluegrass Varietal Trial National Turfgrass Evaluation Program - Final Report 2000 C.E. Miluch

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Table 1. Bowie ground cover from various herbicides applied at seeding, 0WAE, or 2 WAE Description bowie bowie bowie. % % Number of Subsamples 1 1 1

University of GA Coop Ext Service

CONTENTS ON-SITE TESTING OF GRASSES FOR OVERSEEDING OF BERMUDAGRASS FAIRWAYS INTRODUCTION...1

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Performance Testing of Tall Fescue Turfgrasses at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

(TURF1402) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service Poa annua Control in Overseeded 'Tifway' Bermudagrass.

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Planting Date: Planting Method: Broadcast Rate: 10 lb/1000 sq ft

1995 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Turfgrass Association of Australia (ACT Incorporated) Perennial Rye, Seeded Couch and Tall Fescue evaluation Trials

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

2016 Turfgrass Proceedings

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

MEDIA PACK 2019 MAGAZINE WINDOWS DOORS CONSERVATORIES GLASS FABRICATORS DISTRIBUTORS INSTALLERS. October 2018 Issue

Smooth Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass with Pendulum Formulations

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Roundup Ready Trial Page 12

Total Production by Month (Acre Feet)

20 Turfgrass Proceedings

EFFICACY/CROP TOLERANCE PERFORMANCE FORM Page 1 of 69 Tolerance Study AAFC15-068T-200 Indaziflam / Lowbush Blueberry

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

NEWS Release. U.S. Manufacturing Technology Orders. Year-to-date U.S. manufacturing technology orders up 4.1% over 2011

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman

KENTUCKY BLUEGRASSES FOR TURF. J.C. Pair, R.N. Carrow, L.D. Leuthold, and R.A. Keen' September 1981 AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri

Valley Real Estate Review

Variety testing of Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices

Sunflower Hybrids. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1024

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20 <Westbound and Southbound>

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

COTTON. Mississippi VARIETY TRIALS, Information Bulletin 372 August Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA W. H. Gay - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

Preston s Edmond Market Report

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Up and Down Months of the Stock Market

Inventory Levels - All Prices. Inventory Levels - By Price Range

Date Event or Holiday :Sun, 2:Mon North Orchard Delong Preschool North Orchard Delong Preschool

Commercial-in-Confidence Ashton Old Baths Financial Model - Detailed Cashflow

Thirty Years of Climatological Data: 1969 to 1998

Recommendations and summary of results 2010

2015 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section

CEO PROGRAM September 2018

Smooth Crabgrass Control in 'KY 31' Tall Fescue with Pendulum Formulations

Variety testing of Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata

Greenbush School Maintenance Calendar

2010 New York Hybrid Corn Grain Performance Trials

In the Texas High Plains

2011 Turfgrass Proceedings

Transcription:

2004 NTEP Perennial Ryegrass Test 2005 Results Glenn Hardebeck and Cale Bigelow Objective Rationale To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana. Perennial ryegrass is used for golf course tees and fairways and some highly maintained athletic fields because it can tolerate relatively short mowing heights and traffic. Use of perennial ryegrass has been problematic due to such problems as disease susceptibility. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of perennial ryegrass varieties to aid in cultivar selection. How It Was Done One hundred twenty varieties of perennial ryegrass were seeded on 10 Sep 2004 at the William H. Daniel Research and Diagnostic Center on a silt loam soil. Seeding rate was 6.0 lbs per 1000 ft 2 and seed was spread using a hand shaker jar. After seeding the experiment was lightly raked and a starter fertilizer (6-24-24) was applied at the rate of 1.0 lbs P 2 O 5 per 1000 ft 2. The area was covered with a germination blanket following seeding to prevent washing of seed and mixing of varieties. Plots are maintained under a typical fairway maintenance regime. The mowing height is 0.5 inch, mowed 3x per week. The annual fertilization is 3.0 lbs. N per 1000 ft 2 with 1 lb applied in mid- May, 1 lb in mid-september, and 1.0 lb. in early November. Irrigation is applied to prevent any sign of stress. Data collected in 2005 included genetic color, spring green-up, gray leaf spot and visual quality ratings from April to November. All data taken were visual observations of turf characteristics and performance. Visual color and green-up ratings were taken using a scale of 1 to 9 with 1 = light green or dormant and 9 = dark green turf. Gray leaf spot ratings were measured as a percent affected turf in increments of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 percent affected turf. Visual quality ratings were taken using a scale of 1 to 9 with 1 = no living turf, 5 = acceptable turf, and 9 = ideal turf. Results to Date There are no statistical differences in average visual quality among the top 53 cultivars (Table 1). When making cultivar selections, it is best to consult the NTEP web page at www.ntep.org for complete performance data from around the country on cultivars, placing special emphasis on how cultivars perform in IN, IL, KY, MI and/or OH (depending if you are located in northern, central, or southern IN) under the specific maintenance regime you intend for that grass. Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation.

Table 1. Visual quality, genetic color, green-up and gray leaf spot severity of 120 perennial ryegrass cultivars growing under high maintenance in 2005. Cultivar Visual quality a Genetic Spring Gray Leaf April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Avg Color b green-up c Spot d DP1 7.3 6.7 6.0 6.7 9.0 8.7 8.3 8.3 7.6 7.7 7.3 0.0 GL-2 6.7 7.7 6.3 7.0 8.7 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.5 7.7 7.0 8.3 RNS 7.3 7.7 7.0 7.0 8.3 7.3 7.7 7.7 7.5 7.3 5.3 8.3 IS-PR-235 6.7 7.0 6.3 6.7 9.0 8.7 7.7 7.7 7.5 8.0 7.0 0.0 Pick RB-1 7.3 6.3 6.0 6.0 9.0 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.3 6.3 0.0 IS-PR 270 6.3 7.3 6.3 7.3 8.3 8.0 7.7 8.0 7.4 7.7 7.0 0.0 JR-348 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.3 9.0 8.7 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.7 7.3 0.0 TR47 7.7 7.3 5.7 6.3 8.7 8.0 7.7 7.3 7.3 8.3 6.0 0.0 IS-PR 273 6.3 7.3 6.3 6.7 8.3 8.0 7.7 7.7 7.3 7.3 7.0 0.0 IS-PR-236 7.0 7.3 6.0 6.7 8.7 8.0 7.3 7.3 7.3 8.0 6.3 0.0 Exacta II (LTP-611-GLSR) 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.3 8.3 7.7 8.0 7.7 7.3 8.0 7.3 0.0 TRS 7.0 7.3 6.3 6.3 8.3 8.0 7.7 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.3 0.0 EXS54 7.7 7.0 6.3 6.3 8.3 8.0 7.3 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.7 8.3 IS-PR-312 6.0 7.0 6.0 6.3 8.7 8.3 8.0 7.7 7.3 7.7 6.7 0.0 Pick F4 7.0 7.0 6.3 6.7 8.7 7.7 7.7 7.0 7.3 7.0 7.0 0.0 LCK 6.7 7.0 5.7 6.3 8.7 8.3 7.7 7.0 7.2 7.0 6.7 0.0 PM 101 7.3 7.7 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.7 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.7 7.0 8.3 D04-UP 7.3 6.7 6.0 6.0 8.3 8.0 7.7 7.3 7.2 7.0 6.3 0.0 VB77 7.0 6.7 6.0 6.0 8.3 8.0 7.3 7.3 7.1 8.0 6.7 0.0 IS-PR 271 6.3 6.7 6.3 6.3 8.3 8.0 7.7 7.0 7.1 8.3 6.3 0.0 RG3P 7.3 6.7 6.3 6.3 8.3 7.7 7.3 6.7 7.1 7.0 6.3 8.3 DCM 7.0 6.3 6.3 6.3 8.3 7.7 7.3 7.3 7.1 7.3 6.0 0.0 $ilver Dollar 5.3 6.3 6.0 7.0 8.3 8.0 7.7 8.0 7.1 7.3 7.7 0.0 SRX 4UP3 6.7 6.0 6.3 6.7 8.3 7.7 7.7 7.3 7.1 7.3 7.7 0.0 IS-PR-274 6.3 7.3 6.0 6.0 8.3 8.0 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.7 6.7 0.0 IS-PR-233 7.0 7.3 5.0 5.7 8.7 8.0 7.3 7.3 7.0 8.3 6.0 0.0 Charismatic II 6.3 6.0 5.7 6.7 8.7 8.0 7.7 7.3 7.0 7.0 6.7 0.0 PRG HS-01-09 7.7 7.3 5.7 6.3 8.0 7.7 6.7 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.3 8.3 MS2 7.0 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.3 7.0 7.3 7.7 7.0 8.0 6.0 0.0 Buena Vista 7.0 7.0 5.7 6.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.7 0.0 AC2 7.0 7.3 6.3 6.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 6.7 7.0 7.7 6.3 0.0 IS-PR-268 7.0 6.3 6.0 6.0 8.3 7.7 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.3 6.3 0.0 D04-LP05 6.7 6.3 5.7 6.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.3 7.0 7.7 6.3 0.0

LPFG 6.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 8.3 7.7 8.0 7.3 6.9 7.7 6.0 0.0 SP4 7.3 6.7 5.7 5.3 7.7 7.7 7.3 7.7 6.9 8.0 6.0 0.0 Protégé GLR 6.0 6.3 5.7 6.0 8.3 8.0 7.3 7.3 6.9 7.7 7.3 0.0 D04-1667 5.7 6.3 6.0 6.0 8.3 8.0 7.3 7.0 6.8 7.0 6.7 0.0 CNV 7.3 6.3 6.0 5.7 8.0 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.8 7.7 6.0 0.0 JR-408 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.0 7.3 7.3 7.0 6.3 6.8 7.0 5.3 0.0 IS-PR-269 7.3 6.3 5.3 5.7 8.0 7.7 7.3 6.7 6.8 7.3 6.3 8.3 AAZ-B104 6.3 6.3 5.7 6.3 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.7 6.8 7.0 6.7 0.0 AJM 7.3 7.0 5.7 5.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 6.3 6.8 7.3 6.3 0.0 MMW 6.3 6.3 4.3 6.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 7.7 6.8 7.3 7.0 0.0 Fusion 6.7 6.3 6.0 5.7 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.3 6.8 7.0 6.3 8.3 PST-2MNG 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.0 8.0 7.3 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.3 6.3 0.0 RAD-PR8 6.7 7.0 6.0 6.3 6.7 6.7 7.3 7.3 6.8 8.0 6.0 0.0 ES45 7.0 6.7 5.7 5.3 8.0 7.7 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.7 6.3 0.0 PWDR 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 7.7 7.3 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.0 6.3 0.0 Gray Star (PST-2LGL) 7.3 6.3 5.7 6.7 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.7 7.0 5.0 0.0 Pinnacle II 6.3 6.7 6.0 6.7 7.0 6.7 7.3 7.0 6.7 7.0 6.3 0.0 SRX 4SP 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.7 7.3 7.0 7.3 6.7 7.3 7.0 0.0 Inspire 7.0 6.3 6.0 6.3 7.3 7.3 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.3 6.0 0.0 IS-PR-276 5.3 6.0 5.0 6.0 8.7 7.7 7.7 7.0 6.7 7.7 6.7 0.0 Mach I 7.3 6.0 5.7 5.7 8.0 7.3 6.7 6.3 6.6 7.0 6.0 8.3 JR-L63 7.0 6.7 5.7 5.7 7.3 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.0 0.0 PST-2AG4 7.3 6.7 5.3 5.3 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.6 7.3 7.0 8.3 D04-11T 7.0 6.7 5.7 5.7 8.0 7.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.7 6.3 8.3 Pizzazz 6.3 6.0 5.7 6.0 7.3 7.3 7.0 7.0 6.6 8.3 6.0 8.3 Halo (KN42) 7.0 7.0 5.0 5.7 7.3 7.3 6.7 6.3 6.5 7.3 5.7 8.3 SNR 6.7 6.3 5.3 5.0 8.0 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.5 7.3 5.7 8.3 PST-2AM 6.7 5.7 5.7 6.3 7.3 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.5 7.0 6.0 0.0 PST-2LAN 7.0 6.3 5.0 5.3 8.0 7.3 7.0 6.3 6.5 6.7 6.0 0.0 Pick 02-R 7.0 7.7 7.0 6.7 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.5 7.3 6.3 16.7 APR 1797 6.7 6.3 5.3 5.7 7.7 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.5 7.3 6.0 0.0 APR-1663 5.7 6.7 6.0 5.7 7.7 7.7 6.7 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 0.0 Panther GLS 5.7 6.3 5.3 5.7 8.0 7.7 6.7 6.7 6.5 7.0 6.3 0.0 DP 17-9505 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.5 7.7 6.7 8.3 PST-2GSM 7.0 5.3 4.3 4.7 8.0 8.0 7.3 7.0 6.5 6.7 5.7 0.0 Palmer IV 6.7 6.0 5.0 5.3 7.7 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.5 7.0 6.7 0.0 PM 103 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.7 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.5 7.7 6.3 8.3

DP 17-9502 6.3 7.3 6.3 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 6.7 25.0 GPR 7.0 6.3 4.7 5.3 7.7 7.3 6.7 6.3 6.4 7.3 6.0 0.0 VB99 7.3 6.7 5.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.4 7.3 6.0 0.0 Pick 01-2 6.7 6.0 5.7 5.7 7.7 7.0 6.7 6.0 6.4 7.0 6.3 0.0 Quicksilver 7.0 6.0 5.3 5.3 7.7 7.3 6.7 6.0 6.4 7.0 4.7 0.0 APR 1670 6.3 4.7 5.7 5.7 7.7 7.3 7.3 6.7 6.4 7.0 6.7 8.3 RTS 7.3 6.7 5.3 4.7 7.7 7.0 6.3 6.0 6.4 7.3 5.7 0.0 Secretariat II 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 8.0 7.7 7.3 6.7 6.4 7.3 6.3 0.0 Overdrive 6.7 6.0 5.0 5.7 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.4 7.0 6.0 0.0 BAR Lp 4420 7.0 6.7 5.7 5.7 6.3 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.4 7.3 5.7 8.3 E-99 6.3 5.7 5.0 6.0 7.3 7.3 7.0 6.3 6.4 6.7 6.7 0.0 Paragon GLR 7.0 6.7 5.3 5.0 7.3 7.0 6.0 6.3 6.3 7.0 6.3 0.0 JR-324 7.3 6.3 5.7 6.0 7.0 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.7 6.0 0.0 JR-255 7.3 5.7 5.3 5.0 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.3 7.0 6.3 0.0 Repell GLS 6.7 5.7 5.7 5.0 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.3 7.0 6.3 0.0 JR-119 6.7 5.3 5.7 5.7 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 0.0 DP 17-9499 5.3 5.7 5.7 6.3 7.7 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.3 7.7 6.7 16.7 PST-2BLK 6.3 5.7 5.3 4.7 7.7 7.3 6.7 6.0 6.2 6.3 5.0 0.0 AF 6.3 5.7 4.7 5.0 8.0 7.7 6.0 6.3 6.2 7.7 6.7 16.7 Citation Fore 5.7 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.7 6.2 7.0 7.0 8.3 Headstart 2 6.7 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.7 6.3 8.3 L44 6.7 6.3 5.0 5.0 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.2 7.7 6.0 0.0 BPR 6.7 5.7 5.0 5.0 7.7 6.7 6.7 6.0 6.2 7.0 5.7 8.3 PST-217 7.3 5.7 5.3 5.7 7.3 6.3 6.3 5.3 6.2 6.0 5.0 0.0 04-BRE 6.3 6.0 4.3 4.3 7.7 7.3 6.7 6.7 6.2 7.3 6.3 8.3 PS-2 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.2 7.0 5.7 8.3 Sunshine 2 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.0 25.0 ARR 1664 6.0 6.0 4.7 5.0 7.3 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.1 5.0 6.3 8.3 BAR Lp 4317 6.3 5.0 4.7 5.3 6.7 7.0 6.7 7.0 6.1 7.0 5.7 0.0 APR1660 6.3 5.3 5.3 4.7 7.3 6.7 6.3 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 0.0 PM 102 6.0 6.3 5.0 5.7 6.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.3 6.7 8.3 04-BEN 6.0 5.3 4.3 5.0 7.7 6.7 6.3 6.0 5.9 7.3 6.3 0.0 SRX 4692 5.3 5.0 4.7 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.3 5.9 7.0 6.3 0.0 JR-114 6.7 6.3 4.7 5.3 5.7 6.3 6.3 5.3 5.8 6.0 5.7 8.3 APR 1648 7.0 7.0 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.0 5.3 5.3 5.8 7.3 7.0 16.7 Brightstar SLT 6.0 5.7 5.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.7 5.8 7.0 6.0 16.7 Premier II 5.0 5.3 5.0 5.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.0 5.7 7.0 6.0 0.0

Palmer III 5.7 5.0 5.0 5.3 6.3 6.3 6.0 5.3 5.6 6.3 6.0 0.0 Panther 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.7 5.5 5.7 6.0 0.0 SRX 4682 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.3 6.7 6.7 6.0 6.0 5.5 7.3 5.0 8.3 Pentium 5.7 6.0 4.7 5.3 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.5 6.7 5.7 8.3 DP 17-9788 5.3 5.3 4.7 5.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.4 6.7 6.0 8.3 Barlennium 5.3 5.3 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.7 5.0 5.0 5.1 6.0 6.0 8.3 LPR 02203 6.0 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 5.7 5.0 4.8 5.3 5.7 16.7 BAR Lp 4920 6.0 6.0 5.3 5.0 3.3 4.3 4.0 4.3 4.8 6.3 6.7 50.0 Affinity 5.0 4.3 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.3 4.5 5.7 5.3 8.3 Premier 4.3 4.0 4.7 4.3 3.7 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 6.3 58.3 Da Vinci (TTTF) e 3.3 3.3 4.0 3.7 5.3 5.0 4.0 3.3 4.0 3.7 5.0 0.0 Pinnacle 3.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.7 2.7 3.3 3.3 4.3 5.3 41.7 Linn 2.7 2.3 3.0 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.3 1.7 2.4 3.0 4.7 58.3 LSD (0.05) 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 0.9 1.5 1.3 22.0 a Visual quality ratings were taken using a scale of 1 to 9 with 1 = no living turf, 5 = acceptable turf, and 9 = ideal turf. b Color was rated on a scale of 1 to 9 were 1 = light green and 9 = dark green. c Green-up was rated on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = dormant and 9 = green. d Gray Leaf Spot was rated visually 15 Sep. as percent affected turf in increments of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100. e Da Vinci Turf Type Tall Fescue