MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

Similar documents
MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study


Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC

Appendix B: Traffic Reports

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM

Wellington Street West

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.

Interstate 80 Corridor Study

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

C. iv) Analysis/Results

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Date: December 20, Project #:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

MEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee

One Harbor Point Residential

Lakeside Terrace Development

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

CitiGate Retail Development

Intersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

CastleGlenn Consultants Inc.

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS

Appendix A City of Sammamish Town Center Sub-Area Plan FEIS September 2007

RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic Impact Study

Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Minto Mahogany Stage 2

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA

Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825

Mobilia Centre Merivale Road and 530/540 West Hunt Club Road Transportation Overview and Parking Study

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

Proposed Pit Development

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF CANADA 1021 THOMAS SPRATT PLACE TRANSPORTATION BRIEF

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

APPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Transcription:

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: W:\7k\7359 City Center BRT Functional Planning\7359.500 Transport\7359.505 Technical Memos\PM peak hour analysis\7359-ks-memo-revised Network Signal Configuration\7359-ks-Sce 7.doc Afternoon peak hour traffic analysis for City Centre Mississauga BRT for Background Traffic (Existing Traffic + 30% Growth) The memorandum presents the results of Traffic Analysis for the revised network configuration at Rathburn Road and City Centre Drive. As discussed in previous memorandum on dated October 26, 2009; Scenario 5.1 presents the Background traffic with the signalized intersection at Rathburn Road and Hammerson Drive was reanalyzed with revised network configuration at Rathburn Road and City Centre/ Centre View Drive Intersection. The revised BRT design used for this Scenario is presented in Technical Appendix A. BRT Preliminary Design: In this Scenario 7.1 following road network changes were considered from the previous Scenario 5.1: Northbound left turn was closed for the general purpose traffic and only allowed for the buses. Hence, necessary traffic was redistribution based on existing traffic pattern. The revised traffic volume distribution was presented in Technical Appendix B; Mississauga Transit buses are assumed to enter to Rathburn Road and City Centre View Drive intersection from Highway 403 off-ramp. The BRT and Mississauga Transit buses assume to travel through on General Purpose Lane on Rathburn Road and then merge into BRT lane; The Westbound BRT bus station assume to shift to west of Rathburn Road and Station Gate intersection, which was previously designed at east of the intersection. Due to this change, the BRT buses were turning right to Station Gate Road were assumed to turn right on Duke of York Boulevard. Due to revised volume distribution, the southbound right turn traffic demand may increase significantly and therefore, it was assume to provide an extra storage lane of 35 to 40 m length for the southbound right turn traffic. This provision will increase the intersection capacity and reduce the delay to the all the movements. Transit Network: The a.m. peak hour BRT and local bus operation assumptions were utilised for the p.m. peak hour VISSIM analysis.

Memo To: Date: February 1, 2010 Page 2 Signal Timings: The revised traffic volumes were input into a Synchro model of the City Centre area and signal timings were optimized (presented in Technical Appendix C). For this Scenario, the following changes in the signal timing designed were considered: At Rathburn Road/ City Centre Drive, the eastbound and westbound left turn is assumed to travel in protected phase (instead of protected + permitted in Scenario 5.1) and the BRT buses are assume to travel in the same phase with eastbound through traffic. Similarly, at the Rathburn Road/ Hammerson Drive (Square-One North Entrance), the westbound left turn was assume to turn in protected phase and the BRT buses are assume to travel in the same phase with the eastbound through traffic. In this configuration the westbound BRT buses are not require to turn right at Rathburn Road/ Station Gate. Therefore, the dedicated phase for the BRT line is removed from this intersection and provided at the Rathburn Road/ Duke of York Boulevard intersection. The BRT buses is assumed to arrive at Rathburn Road/ Duke of York Boulevard intersection in a dedicated lane and travel to westbound through and westbound right. Results: The results were simulated using VISSIM. The intersection Levels of Service (LOS) and Delay for Scenario 7.1 is presented in Table 1. The LOS and Queue Lengths for the critical movements at each intersection are also included. The overall intersection delays, level of service and queue length results are provided in the Technical Appendix D. Table 1: Intersection Delay, LOS and Queue Length Overall Intersection Critical Movement Intersection Average Delay LOS Movement LOS Queue Length 95% Rathburn Road at Duke of York Blvd. 44.2 D WBT D 186 Rathburn Road at City Center Transit 35.1 D EBT/ NBL C/F 188/ 69 Terminal Rathburn Road at Square One North 26.0 C WBL E 67 Entrance Rathburn Road at City Centre Drive 69.7 E WBT F 128 City Centre Drive at Square One West 31.5 C EBL E 83 Entrance Centre View Drive at Station Gate Road 0.8 A NBL D 7 Centre View Drive at Duke of York Blvd. 17.4 B NBL C 74 Square One West and DOY Blvd 15.0 B WBL D 49

Memo To: Date: February 1, 2010 Page 3 BRT Travel Times The BRT bus travel time results from Scenario 5 and Scenario 6 are summarized in Table 2, providing a summary of all BRT bus travel times going between points A and B (EB) and going between points B and A (WB). Point A is located on the Eastern edge of Station Gate Road on Rathburn Road. Point B is located on the Western edge of City Centre Drive on Rathburn Road. Figure 4 shows a VISSIM image indicating the placement of these points. Point A Point B Figure 1: BRT Travel Time Point Table 2: Summary of BRT Bus Travel Times between Points A and B (EB) and Points B and A (WB) WBL Buses EBGPL WBGPL (Mississauga Movements EB- BRT WB BRT (Travel (Travel transit buses buses time on EB time on entering to GPL) WB GPL) Station) Travel Time Segment 1 2 5 3 4 Hourly Volume (vph) 39 18 36 609 834 Travel Time (Sec) 74* 29 60 66 75 * - This travel time includes 51 seconds of travel time + 20 seconds of dwelling time for bus stopping at EB BRT stop.

Memo To: Date: February 1, 2010 Page 4 Conclusion: This analysis results shows that revised signal timing plans without dedicated phase for BRT line and protected left turn at Rathburn Road / City Centre View Drive and Rathburn Road / Hammerson Drive will provide almost same overall level of service to the intersection though it will reduce the travel time of BRT lines significantly. The buses entering from the Highway 403 off ramp will reduce the overall intersection capacity at the Rathburn Road / City Centre Drive intersection and it increase the conflict with westbound through and westbound right turning traffic. It is advisable to conduct the detailed safety review for this proposed bus route from Highway 403 off-ramp to Rathburn Road. The provision of extra right turn storage lane will ease the traffic congestion at Rathburn Road/ Duke of York Boulevard intersection.

APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY DESIGN PLAN FOR PROPOSED BRT FACILITY

APPENDIX B VOLUME DISTRIBUTION FOR SCENARIO 7.1

Scenario 7.1 - Background Traffic Scenario on BRT Network - Signalized T-Intersection at Hammerson Drive and Rathburn Road with revised network configuration (Dtd: 29 Jan, 2010 664 773 773 507 773 266 8 781 781 53 611 648 74 127 7 127 127 1 0 1369 127 127 877 722 15 1 880 722 14 0 429 1071 1093 235 434 211 143 0 14 857 1108 1104 0 1104 1104 905 0 33 94 25 1071 108 166 709 107 0 712 13 884 884 884 593 871 490 699 172 752 107 593 871 181 165 155 320 884 884 872 872 490 721 35 357 98 129 311 825 385 706 122 618 211 430 828 293 114 179 140 706 443 412 246 514 460 564 1446 1104 350 551 51 277 472 122 46 0 55 199 160 22 314 363 1209 412 705 2877 SQUARE ONE 146 381 120 3376

APPENDIX C SYNCHRO OUTPUT- FUTURE SIGNAL TIMINGS

Timings 3: Rathburn Road & Duke of York 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWL Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 82 424 39 83 673 213 363 162 334 186 20 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 9 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 4 9 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 23.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 23.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 11.0 55.0 55.0 11.0 55.0 20.0 35.0 17.0 32.0 32.0 12.0 Total Split (%) 8.5% 42.3% 42.3% 8.5% 42.3% 15.4% 26.9% 13.1% 24.6% 24.6% 9.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None Min None Min Min None Act Effct Green (s) 63.2 51.4 51.4 63.1 51.3 48.3 27.3 42.3 24.3 24.3 5.2 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.49 0.40 0.40 0.49 0.39 0.37 0.21 0.33 0.19 0.19 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.81 0.08 0.52 0.79 0.86 0.89 0.87 0.71 0.58 0.61 Control Delay 35.0 45.9 10.2 25.2 40.1 49.9 59.4 60.9 54.5 19.6 95.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.0 45.9 10.2 25.2 40.6 49.9 59.4 60.9 54.5 19.6 95.6 LOS C D B C D D E E D B F Approach Delay 41.7 39.2 56.4 46.5 95.6 Approach LOS D D E D F Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 114 (88%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 46.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Rathburn Road & Duke of York Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 1

Timings 4: Centre View Dr & Duke of York 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 41 470 212 393 498 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 58.5% 58.5% 58.5% 58.5% 41.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None None Min Act Effct Green (s) 32.6 32.6 32.6 32.6 18.4 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.59 0.44 0.31 0.79 Control Delay 9.0 3.4 18.5 14.7 36.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.0 3.4 18.5 14.7 36.5 LOS A A B B D Approach Delay 3.9 16.0 36.5 Approach LOS A B D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 65 Actuated Cycle Length: 65 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 4: Centre View Dr & Duke of York Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 2

Timings 8: Rathburn Road & Centre View Dr 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 10 579 269 824 19 15 276 279 72 25 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 8 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 23.0 7.0 19.0 Total Split (s) 10.0 53.0 38.0 81.0 81.0 11.0 32.0 32.0 7.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 7.7% 40.8% 29.2% 62.3% 62.3% 8.5% 24.6% 24.6% 5.4% 21.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Max None Max Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 5.0 48.4 30.6 80.0 80.0 34.4 25.0 25.0 31.9 25.5 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.04 0.37 0.24 0.62 0.62 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.25 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.71 0.90 1.00 0.03 0.06 1.08 0.64 0.86 0.05 Control Delay 69.0 27.3 73.2 53.2 6.8 42.2 118.6 17.4 96.2 45.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.0 27.5 73.2 53.2 6.8 42.2 118.6 18.1 96.2 45.6 LOS E C E D A D F B F D Approach Delay 28.1 57.3 67.4 83.2 Approach LOS C E E F Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Signal Delay: 52.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 8: Rathburn Road & Centre View Dr Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 3

Timings 11: Rathburn Rd & Station Gate Rd 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBR SBL Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 680 866 35 42 11 Turn Type custom custom Perm Protected Phases 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Detector Phase 2 6 8 8 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 27.0 27.0 20.0 20.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 107.0 107.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 82.3% 82.3% 17.7% 17.7% 17.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 110.1 110.1 9.8 9.8 9.8 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.85 0.85 0.08 0.08 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.12 Control Delay 4.4 5.9 69.9 18.5 56.1 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.6 6.0 69.9 18.5 56.1 LOS A A E B E Approach Delay 4.6 6.0 Approach LOS A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 93 (72%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 7.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 11: Rathburn Rd & Station Gate Rd Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 4

Timings 12: Centre View Dr & Station Gate Rd 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBT WBT ø8 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 98 606 Turn Type Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 42.0 42.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 64.6% 64.6% 35% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Max C-Max Min Act Effct Green (s) 45.5 45.5 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.70 0.70 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.34 Control Delay 3.2 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.2 3.4 LOS A A Approach Delay 3.2 3.4 Approach LOS A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 65 Actuated Cycle Length: 65 Offset: 35 (54%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.34 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 12: Centre View Dr & Station Gate Rd Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 5

Timings 14: Rathburn Road & Hammerson Dr 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 548 127 715 153 123 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 8 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 2 1 6 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 11.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 83.0 20.0 103.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 63.8% 15.4% 79.2% 20.8% 20.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Min None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 78.5 15.9 97.4 18.6 18.6 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.60 0.12 0.75 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.82 0.72 0.84 0.46 Control Delay 23.1 78.5 6.3 81.5 11.0 Queue Delay 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.5 78.5 6.8 81.5 11.0 LOS C E A F B Approach Delay 23.5 17.6 50.0 Approach LOS C B D Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 104 (80%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: Rathburn Road & Hammerson Dr Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 6

Timings 17: Square-one Entrance & City Center Dr 2/1/2010 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 162 225 296 239 112 292 75 275 Turn Type Perm pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 48.0 48.0 30.0 78.0 11.0 41.0 11.0 41.0 Total Split (%) 36.9% 36.9% 23.1% 60.0% 8.5% 31.5% 8.5% 31.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min None C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 39.8 70.4 67.4 52.6 48.6 36.8 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.31 0.54 0.52 0.40 0.37 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.88 0.26 0.50 0.46 0.75 Control Delay 60.0 40.6 14.4 33.2 29.8 25.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.0 40.6 14.4 33.2 29.8 25.5 LOS E D B C C C Approach Delay 60.0 26.6 30.5 25.5 Approach LOS E C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 104 (80%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 35.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: Square-one Entrance & City Center Dr Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 7

Timings 21: Square-one Entrance & Duke of York 2/1/2010 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 119 127 543 94 139 317 Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Detector Phase 8 8 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 11.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 92.0 92.0 11.0 103.0 Total Split (%) 20.8% 20.8% 70.8% 70.8% 8.5% 79.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.4 17.4 102.6 102.6 102.6 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.79 0.79 0.79 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.48 0.52 0.10 0.39 Control Delay 68.7 11.1 6.9 0.9 7.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.7 11.1 6.9 0.9 7.8 LOS E B A A A Approach Delay 39.0 6.0 7.8 Approach LOS D A A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 24 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 21: Square-one Entrance & Duke of York Scenario 7.1 Synchro 7 - Report Page 8

APPENDIX D INTERSECTION ANALYSIS RESULTS VISSIM

Operational Anaylsis Level of Service, Vehicle Delay, Queue 2031 PM Peak Hour Analysis Scenario 7.1 - Background Traffic Scenario (Existing Traffic + 30% Growth) on BRT Network - Signalized Intersection at Hammerson Drive and Rathburn Road with Revised Bus Movement 2/1/2010 Rathburn Road at Duke of York Blvd. Control Type: Signalized Movements EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Bus WBT Bus-WBR OVERALL Travel Time Segment 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 Queue Counter 601 602 602 604 605 605 607 608 608 610 611 611 613 613 Hourly Volume (vph) 109 550 55 107 807 128 254 451 128 213 404 238 3 14 3444 Vehicle Delay (s) 35 47 55 54 35 32 44 48 49 78 54 15 101 94 44.24 Queue Length 95th (m) 27 107 107 98 186 186 73 121 121 101 90 90 26 26 Level of Service (LOS) C D D D D C D D D E D B F F D Rathburn Road at City Center Transit Terminal Control Type: Signalized Movements EBT EBBusT WBT WBBusL WBBusT WBBusR NBBusL NBusR SBBusL SBBusR OVERALL Travel Time Segment 702 703 705 704 711 706 707 708 709 710 Queue Counter 702 703 705 704 706 706 707 708 709 710 Hourly Volume (vph) 842 5 1018 73 18 0 31 65 30 0 2082 Vehicle Delay (s) 38 12 28 31 9 0 96 67 93 0 35.07 Queue Length 95th (m) 287 0 188 36 0 0 69 67 22 22 Level of Service (LOS) D B C C A F E F D Rathburn Road at Square One North Entrance Control Type: Signalized Movements EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR OVERALL Travel Time Segment 802 803 804 805 807 809 Queue Counter 802 802 804 805 807 807 Hourly Volume (vph) 747 169 136 870 199 163 2284 Vehicle Delay (s) 15 15 67 26 54 22 26.03 Queue Length 95th (m) 189 189 63 168 52 52 Level of Service (LOS) B B E C D C C Rathburn Road at City Centre Drive Control Type: Signalized Movements EBL EBT EBR WBL1 WBT1 WBR1 NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBBusT EBBusT OVERALL Travel Time Segment 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 917 Queue Counter 902 902 902 904 905 905 907 908 908 910 911 911 913 914 Hourly Volume (vph) 13 756 139 305 974 28 28 309 391 90 30 0 26 40 3129 Vehicle Delay (s) 69 23 20 113 101 74 71 71 52 172 41 0 30 15 69.69 Queue Length 95th (m) 98 98 98 128 405 405 24 123 123 75 7 7 21 18 Level of Service (LOS) E C C F F E E E D F D C B E City Centre Drive at Square One West Entrance Control Type: Signalized Movements EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR OVERALL Travel Time Segment 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 Queue Counter 1101 1101 1101 1104 1104 1106 1107 1108 1108 1110 1110 1110 Hourly Volume (vph) 189 289 116 364 321 136 144 390 177 88 357 32 2603 Vehicle Delay (s) 57 48 39 31 21 24 28 35 33 24 16 13 31.53 Queue Length 95th (m) 83 83 83 79 45 45 30 75 75 19 34 34 Level of Service (LOS) E D D C C C C D C C B B C 1/2

Centre View Drive at Station Gate Road Control Type: Signalized 2/1/2010 Movements EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR OVERALL Travel Time Segment 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 Queue Counter 1201 1201 1203 1203 1205 1206 Hourly Volume (vph) 126 35 3 772 3 0 939 Vehicle Delay (s) 1 2 4 1 53 0 0.81 Queue Length 95th (m) 0 0 0 0 7 0 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D A Centre View Drive at Duke of York Blvd. Control Type: Signalized Movements EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR OVERALL Travel Time Segment 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 Queue Counter 1301 1301 1303 1303 1305 1305 Hourly Volume (vph) 85 597 277 501 632 74 2166 Vehicle Delay (s) 11 16 18 14 22 19 17.41 Queue Length 95th (m) 67 67 38 38 74 74 Level of Service (LOS) B B B B C B B Square One Drive at Duke of York Blvd. Control Type: Signalized Movements SBT SBL WBL WBR NBR NBT OVERALL Travel Time Segment 1452 1453 1451 1450 1455 1454 Queue Counter 1452 1453 1450 1450 1455 1455 Hourly Volume (vph) 406 163 151 160 0 707 1587 Vehicle Delay (s) 7 20 51 11 8 12 15.02 Queue Length 95th (m) 24 29 49 49 49 49 Level of Service (LOS) A B D B A B B BRT Lane - Rathburn Movements EBBus WBBus WBBusL EBGPL WBGPL OVERALL Travel Time Segment 1 2 5 3 4 Hourly Volume (vph) 39 18 36 609 834 1536 Travel Time (Sec) 74 29 60 66 75 2/2